Which strengths-based practice? Reconciling strengths-based practice and mandated authority in child protection work.
The recent application of strengths-based practice in child protection settings has been accompanied by evidence of inconsistent implementation and concerns that the approach is incompatible with statutory work. Few studies have moved beyond asking whether child protection workers are implementing strengths-based practice to explore why the approach is enacted as it is. This article describes a mixed methods study using an online survey and interviews to elicit from 225 statutory child protection workers in a large Canadian agency how they applied strengths-based ideas and why they did what they did. The authors found that although strengths-based practice was popular, 70 percent of participants believed that it was not always applicable to child protection work. Participants described five distinct versions of the approach, only one of which was fully congruent with their mandated role. The study suggests that the common conflation of strengths-based and solution-focused approaches ignores important differences in the conceptualization of practitioner authority and leaves practitioners attempting to implement versions ofstrengths-based practice that do not fit statutory child protection work. Only when practitioners choose solution-focused models that support their use of mandated authority is consistent implementation a reasonable expectation.
Carolyn
C
Oliver
Grant
G
Charles
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D002170:Canada; D002648:Child; D002669:Child Welfare / Q000523:psychology*; D003625:Data Collection; D005260:Female; D006284:Health Plan Implementation / Q000458:organization & administration; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010347:Patient Care Planning / Q000458:organization & administration*; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D011209:Power, Psychological; D011340:Problem Solving; D024382:Professional Role / Q000523:psychology