The auditory dynamic attending theory revisited: A closer look at the pitch comparison task.
The dynamic attending theory as originally proposed by Jones, 1976. Psychol. Rev. 83(5), 323-355 posits that tone sequences presented at a regular rhythm entrain attentional oscillations and thereby facilitate the processing of sounds presented in phase with this rhythm. The increased interest in neural correlates of dynamic attending requires robust behavioral indicators of the phenomenon. Here we aimed to replicate and complement the most prominent experimental implementation of dynamic attending (Jones et al., 2002. Psychol. Sci. 13(4), 313-319). The paradigm uses a pitch comparison task in which two tones, the initial and the last of a longer series, have to be compared. In-between the two, distractor tones with variable pitch are presented, at a regular pace. A comparison tone presented in phase with the entrained rhythm is hypothesized to lead to better behavioral performance. Aiming for a conceptual replication, four different variations of the original paradigm were created which were followed by an exact replication attempt. Across all five experiments, only 40 of the 140 tested participants showed the hypothesized pattern of an inverted U-shaped profile in task accuracy, and the group average effects did not replicate the pattern reported by Jones et al., 2002. Psychol. Sci. 13(4), 313-319 in any of the five experiments. However, clear evidence for a relationship between musicality and overall behavioral performance was found. This study casts doubt on the suitability of the pitch comparison task for demonstrating auditory dynamic attending. We discuss alternative tasks that have been shown to support dynamic attending theory, thus lending themselves more readily to studying its neural correlates. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled SI: Prediction and Attention.
Neuropsychology Lab, Department of Psychology, European Medical School, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany. Electronic address: katharina.bauer@uni-oldenburg.de.
Anna-Katharina R
AK
Bauer
Neuropsychology Lab, Department of Psychology, European Medical School, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany; Research Center Neurosensory Science, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Manuela
M
Jaeger
Neuropsychology Lab, Department of Psychology, European Medical School, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Jeremy D
JD
Thorne
Research Center Neurosensory Science, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany; Cluster of Excellence Hearing4all, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany; Auditory Psychophysiology Lab, Department of Psychology, European Medical School, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Alexandra
A
Bendixen
Neuropsychology Lab, Department of Psychology, European Medical School, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany; Research Center Neurosensory Science, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany; Cluster of Excellence Hearing4all, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.
Stefan
S
Debener
D000161:Acoustic Stimulation; D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008960:Models, Psychological; D010897:Pitch Discrimination; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012107:Research Design; D055815:Young Adult
Entrainment; Musicality; Replication; Temporal expectation