How should greenhouse gas emissions be taken into account in the decision making of municipal solid waste management procurements? A case study of the South Karelia region, Finland.
The ongoing trend in the public sector is to make more sustainable procurements by taking into account the impacts throughout the entire life cycle of the procurement. Despite the trend, the only deciding factor can still be the total costs. This article answers the question of how greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions should be taken into account in municipal solid waste (MSW) management when selecting an incineration plant for source separated mixed MSW. The aim is to guide the decision making of MSW management towards more environmentally friendly procurements. The study was carried out by calculating the global warming potentials (GWPs) and costs of mixed MSW management by using the waste composition from a case area in Finland. Scenarios of landfilling and combustion in three actual waste incineration plants were used to recognise the main processes that affect the results. GWP results show that the combustion of mixed MSW is a better alternative than landfilling the waste. The GHG results from combustion are greatly affected by emissions from the combustion and substituted energy production. The significance of collection and transportation is higher from the costs' perspective than from the point of view of GHG emissions. The main costs, in addition to collection and transportation costs, result from the energy utilization or landfilling of mixed MSW. When tenders are invited for the incineration location of mixed MSW, the main focus should be: What are the annual electricity and heat recovery efficiencies and which are the substituted fuels in the area? In addition, in the case of a fluidized bed combustor it is crucial to know the combusted share of mixed MSW after preparing solid recovered fuel (SRF) and the treatment of rejects. The environmental criteria for the waste incineration plant procurements should be made in order to obtain clear instructions for the procurement units. The results can also be utilized more widely. The substituted fuels in the area and the effect of the plant location on the utilization of the produced energy can already be identified when planning an appropriate site for the waste incineration plant.
Lappeenranta University of Technology, Laboratory of Environmental Technology, P.O. Box 20, FI-53851 Lappeenranta, Finland. Electronic address: mari.hupponen@lut.fi.
M
M
Hupponen
Lappeenranta University of Technology, Laboratory of Environmental Technology, P.O. Box 20, FI-53851 Lappeenranta, Finland.
K
K
Grönman
Lappeenranta University of Technology, Laboratory of Environmental Technology, P.O. Box 20, FI-53851 Lappeenranta, Finland.
M
M
Horttanainen
D000393:Air Pollutants / Q000032:analysis*; D003657:Decision Making; D005387:Finland; D005740:Gases / Q000032:analysis*; D017752:Greenhouse Effect; D062611:Solid Waste / Q000191:economics*; D014186:Transportation; D018505:Waste Management / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods*
D000393:Air Pollutants; D005740:Gases; D062611:Solid Waste
Combustion; Landfilling; Life cycle assessment; Mixed municipal solid waste; Public procurement; Waste management