From evidence to clinical practice in blood and marrow transplantation.
Clinical practice in the field of blood and marrow transplantation (BMT) has evolved over time, as a result of thousands of basic and clinical research studies. While it appears that scientific discovery and adaptive clinical research may be well integrated in case of BMT, there is lack of sufficient literature to definitively understand the process of translation of evidence to practice and if it may be selective . In this review, examples from BMT and other areas of medicine are used to highlight the state of and potential barriers to evidence uptake. Strategies to help improve knowledge transfer are discussed and the role of existing framework provided by the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Registry (CIBMTR) to monitor uptake and BMT Clinical Trials Network (BMT CTN) to enhance translation of evidence into practice is highlighted.
College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 5777 E Mayo Blvd, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA. Electronic address: khera.nandita@mayo.edu.
Nandita
N
Khera
D016026:Bone Marrow Transplantation / Q000379:methods*; D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine / Q000193:education*; D018380:Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D033181:Information Dissemination; D018579:Patient Selection; D036102:Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation / Q000379:methods*; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; D057170:Translational Research, Biomedical / Q000193:education*
Blood and marrow transplantation; Clinical trials; Dissemination and implementation research; Evidence uptake; Practice patterns