Commentary on: "Randomized phase III trial of temsirolimus and bevacizumab versus interferon alfa and bevacizumab in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: INTORACT trial." Rini BI, Bellmunt J, Clancy J, Wang K, Niethammer AG, Hariharan S, Escudier B. Brian I. Rini, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH; Joaquim Bellmunt, University Hospital del Mar-IMIM, Barcelona, Spain; Jill Clancy, Kongming Wang, Andreas G. Niethammer, Subramanian Hariharan, Pfizer, New York, NY; and Bernard Escudier, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.: J Clin Oncol. 2014 Mar 10;32(8):752-9; doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.50.5305. [Epub 2013 Dec 2].
OBJECTIVE
To prospectively determine the efficacy of combination therapy with temsirolimus plus bevacizumab versus interferon alfa (IFN) plus bevacizumab in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).


METHODS
In a randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase III study, patients with previously untreated predominantly clear cell mRCC were randomly assigned, stratified by prior nephrectomy and Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center prognostic group, to receive the combination of either temsirolimus (25mg intravenously, weekly) or IFN (9MIU subcutaneously thrice weekly) with bevacizumab (10mg/kg intravenously, every 2weeks). The primary end point was independently assessed progression-free survival (PFS).


RESULTS
Median PFS in patients treated with temsirolimus/bevacizumab (n = 400) versus IFN/bevacizumab (n = 391) was 9.1 and 9.3 months, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.1; 95% CI: 0.9 to 1.3; P = .8). There were no significant differences in overall survival (25.8 ν 25.5 months; HR = 1.0; P = .6) or objective response rate (27.0% ν 27.4%) with temsirolimus/bevacizumab versus IFN/bevacizumab, respectively. Patients receiving temsirolimus/bevacizumab reported significantly higher overall mean scores in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index (FKSI)-15 and FKSI Disease-Related Symptoms subscale compared with IFN/bevacizumab (indicating improvement); however, no differences in global health outcome measures were observed. Treatment-emergent all-causality grade≥3 adverse events more common (P<.001) with temsirolimus/bevacizumab were mucosal inflammation, stomatitis, hypophosphatemia, hyperglycemia, and hypercholesterolemia, whereas neutropenia was more common with IFN/bevacizumab. Incidence of pneumonitis with temsirolimus/bevacizumab was 4.8%, mostly grade 1 or 2.


CONCLUSIONS
Temsirolimus/bevacizumab combination therapy was not superior to IFN/bevacizumab for first-line treatment in clear-cell mRCC.
Donald
D
Trump
D000971:Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D002292:Carcinoma, Renal Cell / Q000188:drug therapy*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007680:Kidney Neoplasms / Q000188:drug therapy*; D008297:Male