Seclusion as a necessary vs. an appropriate intervention: a vignette study among mental health nurses.
In a vignette study, mental health nurses were asked to score vignettes on necessity and appropriateness using a Likert scale. Sixty-nine clinical nurses from four mental health institutes scored 64 vignettes on necessity (there is no alternative) and appropriateness (seclusion supports patients' treatment) of seclusion simultaneously. Data analysis focused on the differences between both scores, and included general linear model analysis, t-test statistics and Kendall's tau. The t-test resulted in a significantly higher score on necessity than on appropriateness. Differences between both scores could be explained for 32% by a combination of nurse characteristics and vignette variables. Necessity and appropriateness were found to be strongly associated with each other, showing that underpinning patterns were largely the same. This research enhances the understanding of underlying factors that influence the decision of nurses to use seclusion. This is essential for the development of interventions aimed at the reduction of seclusion use in mental health practice.
ProCES (Pro Persona Centre for Education and Science), Pro Persona Mental Health Care, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
P S
PS
Mann-Poll
A
A
Smit
B
B
Koekkoek
G
G
Hutschemaekers
D000328:Adult; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009741:Nursing Staff, Hospital / Q000592:standards*; D010356:Patient Isolation / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards; D011567:Psychiatric Department, Hospital / Q000592:standards*; D011568:Psychiatric Nursing / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards; D055815:Young Adult
clinical decision; mental health care; seclusion; vignette study