Stimulus conflict triggers behavioral avoidance.
According to a recent extension of the conflict-monitoring theory, conflict between two competing response tendencies is registered as an aversive event and triggers a motivation to avoid the source of conflict. In the present study, we tested this assumption. Over five experiments, we examined whether conflict is associated with an avoidance motivation and whether stimulus conflict or response conflict triggers an avoidance tendency. Participants first performed a color Stroop task. In a subsequent motivation test, participants responded to Stroop stimuli with approach- and avoidance-related lever movements. These results showed that Stroop-conflict stimuli increased the frequency of avoidance responses in a free-choice motivation test, and also increased the speed of avoidance relative to approach responses in a forced-choice test. High and low proportions of response conflict in the Stroop task had no effect on avoidance in the motivation test. Avoidance of conflict was, however, obtained even with new conflict stimuli that had not been presented before in a Stroop task, and when the Stroop task was replaced with an unrelated filler task. Taken together, these results suggest that stimulus conflict is sufficient to trigger avoidance.
Department of Psychology, University of Würzburg, Röntgenring 10, 97070, Würzburg, Germany. dignath.david@gmail.com.
David
D
Dignath
Department of Psychology, University of Würzburg, Röntgenring 10, 97070, Würzburg, Germany.
Andreas B
AB
Eder
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001362:Avoidance Learning; D002755:Choice Behavior; D003220:Conflict, Psychological; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007206:Individuality; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D008960:Models, Psychological; D009042:Motivation; D011930:Reaction Time; D057190:Stroop Test; D055815:Young Adult
Anterior cingulate cortex; Approach–avoidance motivation; Cognitive control; Stimulus conflict versus response conflict