Two methods for engaging with the community in setting priorities for child health research: who engages?
OBJECTIVE
The aims of this study were to assess participatory methods for obtaining community views on child health research.


BACKGROUND
Community participation in research is recognised as an important part of the research process; however, there has been inconsistency in its implementation and application in Australia. The Western Australian Telethon Kids Institute Participation Program employs a range of methods for fostering active involvement of community members in its research. These include public discussion forums, called Community Conversations. While participation levels are good, the attendees represent only a sub-section of the Western Australian population. Therefore, we conducted a telephone survey of randomly selected households to evaluate its effectiveness in eliciting views from a broader cross-section of the community about our research agenda and community participation in research, and whether the participants would be representative of the general population. We also conducted two Conversations, comparing the survey as a recruitment tool and normal methods using the Participation Program.


RESULTS
While the telephone survey was a good method for eliciting community views about research, there were marked differences in the profile of study participants compared to the general population (e.g. 78% vs 50% females). With a 26% response rate, the telephone survey was also more expensive than a Community Conversation. The cold calling approach proved an unsuccessful recruitment method, with only two out of a possible 816 telephone respondents attending a Conversation.


CONCLUSIONS
While the results showed that both of the methods produced useful input for our research program, we could not conclude that either method gained input that was representative of the entire community. The Conversations were relatively low-cost and provided more in-depth information about one subject, whereas the telephone survey provided information across a greater range of subjects, and allowed more quantitative analysis.
Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Wavne
W
Rikkers
Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Katrina
K
Boterhoven de Haan
Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
David
D
Lawrence
School of Population Health, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Perth, Australia.
Anne
A
McKenzie
Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Kirsten
K
Hancock
School of Population Health, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Perth, Australia.
Hayley
H
Haines
Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Daniel
D
Christensen
Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Stephen R
SR
Zubrick
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D000067576:Child Health; D003256:Community Participation; D055812:Community-Based Participatory Research; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014904:Western Australia; D055815:Young Adult