How communication changes when we cannot mime the world: Experimental evidence for the effect of iconicity on combinatoriality.
Communication systems are exposed to two different pressures: a pressure for transmission efficiency, such that messages are simple to produce and perceive, and a pressure for referential efficiency, such that messages are easy to understand with their intended meaning. A solution to the first pressure is combinatoriality--the recombination of a few basic meaningless forms to express an infinite number of meanings. A solution to the second is iconicity--the use of forms that resemble what they refer to. These two solutions appear to be incompatible with each other, as iconic forms are ill-suited for use as meaningless combinatorial units. Furthermore, in the early stages of a communication system, when basic referential forms are in the process of being established, the pressure for referential efficiency is likely to be particularly strong, which may lead it to trump the pressure for transmission efficiency. This means that, where iconicity is available as a strategy, it is likely to impede the emergence of combinatoriality. Although this hypothesis seems consistent with some observations of natural language, it was unclear until recently how it could be soundly tested. This has changed thanks to the development of a line of research, known as Experimental Semiotics, in which participants construct novel communication systems in the laboratory using an unfamiliar medium. We conducted an Experimental Semiotic study in which we manipulated the opportunity for iconicity by varying the kind of referents to be communicated, while keeping the communication medium constant. We then measured the combinatoriality and transmission efficiency of the communication systems. We found that, where iconicity was available, it provided scaffolding for the construction of communication systems and was overwhelmingly adopted. Where it was not available, however, the resulting communication systems were more combinatorial and their forms more efficient to produce. This study enriches our understanding of the fundamental design principles of human communication and contributes tools to enrich it further.
Department of Psychology, Yeshiva University, New York, NY, USA; Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Gareth
G
Roberts
Department of Psychology, Yeshiva University, New York, NY, USA.
Jirka
J
Lewandowski
Department of Psychology, Yeshiva University, New York, NY, USA; Haskins Laboratories, New Haven, CT, USA. Electronic address: bruno.galantucci@yu.edu.
Bruno
B
Galantucci
D000328:Adult; D003142:Communication; D006801:Humans; D007802:Language; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual / Q000502:physiology*; D011578:Psycholinguistics; D011597:Psychomotor Performance / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
Bootstrapping communication; Experimental Semiotics; Language evolution; Sign language; Signs