title: Differential requirements of singleplex and multiplex recombineering of large DNA constructs.
abstract: Recombineering is an in vivo genetic engineering technique involving homologous recombination mediated by phage recombination proteins. The use of recombineering methodology is not limited by size and sequence constraints and therefore has enabled the streamlined construction of bacterial strains and multi-component plasmids. Recombineering applications commonly utilize singleplex strategies and the parameters are extensively tested. However, singleplex recombineering is not suitable for the modification of several loci in genome recoding and strain engineering exercises, which requires a multiplex recombineering design. Defining the main parameters affecting multiplex efficiency especially the insertion of multiple large genes is necessary to enable efficient large-scale modification of the genome. Here, we have tested different recombineering operational parameters of the lambda phage Red recombination system and compared singleplex and multiplex recombineering of large gene sized DNA cassettes. We have found that optimal multiplex recombination required long homology lengths in excess of 120 bp. However, efficient multiplexing was possible with only 60 bp of homology. Multiplex recombination was more limited by lower amounts of DNA than singleplex recombineering and was greatly enhanced by use of phosphorothioate protection of DNA. Exploring the mechanism of multiplexing revealed that efficient recombination required co-selection of an antibiotic marker and the presence of all three Red proteins. Building on these results, we substantially increased multiplex efficiency using an ExoVII deletion strain. Our findings elucidate key differences between singleplex and multiplex recombineering and provide important clues for further improving multiplex recombination efficiency.
authors.affiliation: Department of Biochemistry, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 9HN, United Kingdom.
authors.forename: Thimma R
authors.initials: TR
authors.lastname: Reddy
authors.affiliation: Department of Biochemistry, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 9HN, United Kingdom.
authors.forename: Emma J
authors.initials: EJ
authors.lastname: Kelsall
authors.affiliation: Center for Fisheries, Environment and Aquaculture Sciences, Lowestoft, NR33 0HT, United Kingdom.
authors.forename: Léna M S
authors.initials: LM
authors.lastname: Fevat
authors.affiliation: ES Cell Facility, Center for Core Biotechnology Services, Leicester, LE1 9HN, United Kingdom.
authors.forename: Sarah E
authors.initials: SE
authors.lastname: Munson
authors.affiliation: Department of Biochemistry, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 9HN, United Kingdom.
authors.forename: Shaun M
authors.initials: SM
authors.lastname: Cowley
mesh_terms: D010582:Bacteriophage lambda / Q000235:genetics*; D003001:Cloning, Molecular; D004247:DNA / Q000235:genetics*; D004926:Escherichia coli; D005818:Genetic Engineering / Q000379:methods*; D059765:Homologous Recombination / Q000235:genetics*; D010957:Plasmids
chemical_list: D004247:DNA