title: How can we study reasoning in the brain?
abstract: The brain did not develop a dedicated device for reasoning. This fact bears dramatic consequences. While for perceptuo-motor functions neural activity is shaped by the input's statistical properties, and processing is carried out at high speed in hardwired spatially segregated modules, in reasoning, neural activity is driven by internal dynamics and processing times, stages, and functional brain geometry are largely unconstrained a priori. Here, it is shown that the complex properties of spontaneous activity, which can be ignored in a short-lived event-related world, become prominent at the long time scales of certain forms of reasoning. It is argued that the neural correlates of reasoning should in fact be defined in terms of non-trivial generic properties of spontaneous brain activity, and that this implies resorting to concepts, analytical tools, and ways of designing experiments that are as yet non-standard in cognitive neuroscience. The implications in terms of models of brain activity, shape of the neural correlates, methods of data analysis, observability of the phenomenon, and experimental designs are discussed.
authors.affiliation: GISC and Laboratory of Biological Networks, Center for Biomedical Technology, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid Madrid, Spain.
authors.forename: David
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Papo
keywords: characteristic scales; cognitive neuroscience; non-ergodicity; non-stationarity; observation time; reasoning; resting brain activity; scaling