title: Spinal motor-evoked potentials vs. 50-Hz artifact: Reply.
authors.affiliation: Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India srivastava.dharmendra@yahoo.com.
authors.forename: Dharmendra Kumar
authors.initials: DK
authors.lastname: Srivastava
authors.affiliation: Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India.
authors.forename: Deepak
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Singh
authors.affiliation: Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India.
authors.forename: Bhuwan Chandra
authors.initials: BC
authors.lastname: Tiwari
authors.affiliation: Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India.
authors.forename: Namarata
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Awasthi
authors.affiliation: Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India.
authors.forename: Nuzhat
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Hussain
mesh_terms: D005071:Evoked Potentials; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D064795:Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring / Q000379:methods*; D008479:Mediastinal Neoplasms / Q000601:surgery*; D019635:Neurosurgical Procedures; D013126:Spinal Nerve Roots / Q000503:physiopathology*; D013908:Thoracotomy