title: Is the anesthesiologist necessary in the endoscopy suite? A review of patients, payers and safety.
abstract: The use of propofol for sedation during endoscopy has been increasing, particularly given its association with superior patient satisfaction. Propofol sedation may also allow for higher quality endoscopy exams, increased efficiency of endoscopy suites and most particularly, permit better patient compliance with colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening. However, propofol is typically provided by anesthesia specialists via monitored anesthesia care, and is associated with significant economic burden. Given the increasing use of monitored anesthesia care, which adds significant costs to endoscopy, payers are likely to react with changes in payer policies. One alternative to monitored anesthesia care is non-anesthesiologist administered propofol, which due to safety concerns and a lack of reimbursement has not been widely adopted in the US.
authors.affiliation: Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Connecticut, 263 Farmington Avenue, Farmington, CT 06030, USA.
authors.forename: John
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Birk
authors.forename: Roopjeet Kaur
authors.initials: RK
authors.lastname: Bath
mesh_terms: D000776:Anesthesiology / Q000191:economics* / Q000379:methods; D018686:Anesthetics, Intravenous / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000191:economics*; D003113:Colonoscopy / Q000191:economics*; D054810:Deep Sedation / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000191:economics; D006801:Humans; D007348:Insurance, Health; D061214:Patient Safety; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D015742:Propofol / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000191:economics*
chemical_list: D018686:Anesthetics, Intravenous; D015742:Propofol
keywords: colonoscopy; monitored anesthesia care; patient satisfaction; propofol; sedation