title: Re-visiting Re X: hysterectomy, removal of reproductive capacity and the severely intellectually disabled child in New Zealand.
abstract: The law governing parental consent to any surgery performed on an intellectu- ally disabled minor that results, directly or indirectly, in the loss of reproductive capacity was first considered in New Zealand in the High Court case of Re X in 1991. The decision was remarkable in several respects, not least because it reflected a genuine attempt to obtain a representation of interests beyond those of the particular child and parents involved. However, legal and socio-political developments in the intervening years, both locally and internationally, suggest that a review of the decision is timely. This article questions whether, in light of these events, Re X should be revisited and concludes by suggesting a possible legal response.
authors.forename: Jeanne
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Snelling
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007883:Legislation, Medical; D033242:Minors / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D009520:New Zealand; D033282:Parental Consent / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D019989:Persons with Intellectual Disabilities / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D013245:Sterilization, Reproductive / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*