title: An Analysis and Comparison of Medication Therapy Management Cost-Avoidance vs. Fee-for-Service Financial Models.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To describe, compare, and contrast cost-avoidance and fee-for-service medication therapy management (MTM) financial models of practice to allow clinicians to better choose the type of MTM practice that best fits their particular practice environment.
  
  
  METHODS
  Literature regarding pharmacist practices providing MTM services and capstone projects of proposed and currently operating MTM pharmacist practices presented in the University of Florida Master of Science MTM program.
  Understanding the two major payment methods of sustaining a financially viable MTM pharmacist practice is critical to practice success. Survey was broad with regard to clinical models to compare differences because funding to support these services can be difficult to obtain.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Despite differences in approach, various methods exist to financially sustain a pharmacist with an MTM practice. Each method or model has advantages and disadvantages in differing practice environments.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  With enough cost avoidance or revenue generation, financially dissimilar MTM financial models can be sustainable.
authors.affiliation: Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
authors.forename: Michael J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Schuh
mesh_terms: D018588:Fee-for-Service Plans / Q000191:economics; D006801:Humans; D054539:Medication Therapy Management / Q000191:economics / Q000458:organization & administration*; D018803:Models, Economic; D010593:Pharmaceutical Services / Q000191:economics / Q000458:organization & administration*; D010595:Pharmacists / Q000191:economics* / Q000458:organization & administration