title: Restoration versus reconstruction: cellular mechanisms of skin, nerve and muscle regeneration compared.
abstract: In tissues characterized by a high turnover or following acute injury, regeneration replaces damaged cells and is involved in adaptation to external cues, leading to homeostasis of many tissues during adult life. An understanding of the mechanics underlying tissue regeneration is highly relevant to regenerative medicine-based interventions. In order to investigate the existence a leitmotif of tissue regeneration, we compared the cellular aspects of regeneration of skin, nerve and skeletal muscle, three organs characterized by different types of anatomical and functional organization. Epidermis is a stratified squamous epithelium that migrates from the edge of the wound on the underlying dermis to rebuild lost tissue. Peripheral neurons are elongated cells whose neurites are organized in bundles, within an endoneurium of connective tissue; they either die upon injury or undergo remodeling and axon regrowth. Skeletal muscle is characterized by elongated syncytial cells, i.e. muscle fibers, that can temporarily survive in broken pieces; satellite cells residing along the fibers form new fibers, which ultimately fuse with the old ones as well as with each other to restore the previous organization. Satellite cell asymmetrical division grants a reservoir of undifferentiated cells, while other stem cell populations of muscle and non-muscle origin participate in muscle renewal. Following damage, all the tissues analyzed here go through three phases: inflammation, regeneration and maturation. Another common feature is the occurrence of cellular de-differentiation and/or differentiation events, including gene transcription, which are typical of embryonic development. Nonetheless, various strategies are used by different tissues to replace their lost parts. The epidermis regenerates ex novo, whereas neurons restore their missing parts; muscle fibers use a mixed strategy, based on the regrowth of missing parts through reconstruction by means of newborn fibers. The choice of either strategy is influenced by the anatomical, physical and chemical features of the cells as well as by the extracellular matrix typical of a given tissue, which points to the existence of differential, evolutionary-based mechanisms for specific tissue regeneration. The shared, ordered sequence of steps that characterize the regeneration processes examined suggests it may be possible to model this extremely important phenomenon to reproduce multicellular organisms.
authors.affiliation: UPMC Univ Paris 06, UR4 Ageing, Stress, Inflammation, 75005 Paris, France ; Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic & Orthopaedic Sciences, Section of Histology & Medical Embryology, 00161 Rome, Italy ; Interuniversity Institute of Myology, Kragujevac, Italy.
authors.forename: Dario
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Coletti
authors.affiliation: ENEA-Frascati, UTAPRAD-DIM, Diagnostics and Metrology Laboratory, 00044 Rome, Italy.
authors.forename: Laura
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Teodori
authors.affiliation: UPMC Univ Paris 06, UR4 Ageing, Stress, Inflammation, 75005 Paris, France.
authors.forename: Zhenlin
authors.initials: Z
authors.lastname: Lin
authors.affiliation: Hôpital Tenon, Histology and Tumor Biology, UPMC Univ Paris 06, 75020 Paris, France.
authors.forename: Jean Francois
authors.initials: JF
authors.lastname: Beranudin
authors.affiliation: Department of Anatomical, Histological, Forensic & Orthopaedic Sciences, Section of Histology & Medical Embryology, 00161 Rome, Italy ; Interuniversity Institute of Myology, Kragujevac, Italy.
authors.forename: Sergio
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Adamo
keywords: Damage; Differentiation; Epithelial tissue; Extra cellular matrix; Necrosis; Nervous tissue; Regeneration; Skeletal muscle tissue; Skin scar; Stem cells