title: Reply to Jaakkola (2014): "Do animals understand invisible displacement? A critical review".
abstract: Jaakkola (2014) critiques studies that investigate nonhuman capacities to track objects undergoing invisible displacements. She states that the results of most of these studies are tainted by cuing, that conceptual understanding is lacking, and that, as a consequence, great apes are the only nonhumans to have full Stage 6 object permanence. Any critique, however, must clearly take into account all published information on the techniques being used, including more recent data that counter its negative claims. Furthermore, disagreements as to the interpretation of the underlying mechanisms, although common, need not always cast doubt on the actual findings reported. Here I present material with respect to Grey parrots (Psittacus erithacus) to counter Jaakkola's critique. First, I take issue with Jaakkola's claims of cuing, based both on data from newer studies and citations from the original material. Second, I discuss her suggestions that associative learning rather than inferential mechanisms underlie demonstrated performance, pointing out some difficulties in drawing clear lines between the 2 interpretations. In sum, I argue that Grey parrots, at least, do indeed succeed on tasks involving invisible displacement, and demonstrate full object permanence.
authors.affiliation: Harvard University.
authors.forename: Irene M
authors.initials: IM
authors.lastname: Pepperberg
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001717:Birds / Q000502:physiology*; D032882:Comprehension / Q000502:physiology*; D015186:Hominidae / Q000502:physiology*; D008322:Mammals / Q000502:physiology*; D013028:Space Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D013850:Thinking / Q000502:physiology*