title: Swiss physicians' attitudes to assisted suicide: A qualitative and quantitative empirical study.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  In Switzerland, assisted suicide is legal as long as it does not involve self-serving motives. Physician-assisted suicide is regulated by specific guidelines issued by the Swiss Academy of Medical Sciences (SAMS). This article summarises the results of an empirical study of physicians' attitudes to assisted suicide in Switzerland, which was commissioned by the SAMS. The study (in German) is available online at: www.samw.ch.
  
  
  METHODS
  Twelve qualitative interviews and a written survey were conducted, involving a disproportional, stratified random sample of Swiss physicians (4,837 contacted, 1,318 respondents, response rate 27%).
  
  
  RESULTS
  Due to the response rate and the wide variation of respondents from one professional speciality to another, the findings and interpretations presented should be regarded as applying only to the group of physicians who are interested in or are particularly affected by the issue of assisted suicide. They cannot be generalised to the whole body of physicians in Switzerland. Of the respondents, 77% considered physician-assisted suicide to be justifiable in principle, while 22% were fundamentally opposed to it. Although 43% could imagine situations where they would personally be prepared to perform assisted suicide, it is clear from the study that this potential readiness does not mean that all respondents would automatically be prepared to perform it in practice as soon as the legal criteria are met. The vast majority of respondents emphasised that there should be no obligation to perform physician-assisted suicide. Opinions differed as to whether physician-assisted suicide should remain restricted to cases where the person concerned is approaching the end of life. While a large majority of respondents considered physician-assisted suicide also to be justifiable in principle in non-end-of-life situations, 74% supported the maintenance of the end-of-life criterion in the SAMS Guidelines as a necessary condition for physician-assisted suicide. Over 50% of the respondents had never been confronted with a request for assisted suicide by a patient.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The vast majority of physicians surveyed considered assisted suicide to be justifiable in principle; however, their support was strongly dependent on the specific situation. The study indicates that even physicians expressing a potential readiness to perform assisted suicide themselves would not do so automatically if all the criteria for assisted suicide were met. Assisted suicide thus appears to be an exceptional situation, which physicians would only become involved in on a voluntary basis. The authors recommend that the current SAMS Guidelines regulating physician-assisted suicide in Switzerland should be reviewed with regard to the end-of-life criterion as a necessary condition for physician-assisted suicide.
authors.affiliation: Breuer & Strub / Medizin Ethik, Politik, Zurich, Switzerland.
authors.forename: Susanne
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Brauer
authors.affiliation: Büro Vatter, Policy Research & Consulting, Berne, Switzerland.
authors.forename: Christian
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Bolliger
authors.affiliation: Breuer & Strub / Medizin Ethik, Politik, Zurich, Switzerland.
authors.forename: Jean-Daniel
authors.initials: JD
authors.lastname: Strub
mesh_terms: D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D008297:Male; D010820:Physicians / Q000523:psychology*; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic; D036301:Qualitative Research; D017236:Suicide, Assisted / Q000941:ethics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D013557:Switzerland; D013727:Terminal Care