title: Quantifiers are incrementally interpreted in context, more than less.
abstract: Language interpretation is often assumed to be incremental. However, our studies of quantifier expressions in isolated sentences found N400 event-related brain potential (ERP) evidence for partial but not full immediate quantifier interpretation (Urbach & Kutas, 2010). Here we tested similar quantifier expressions in pragmatically supporting discourse contexts (Alex was an unusual toddler. Most/Few kids prefer sweets/vegetables…) while participants made plausibility judgments (Experiment 1) or read for comprehension (Experiment 2). Control Experiments 3A (plausibility) and 3B (comprehension) removed the discourse contexts. Quantifiers always modulated typical and/or atypical word N400 amplitudes. However, only the real-time N400 effects only in Experiment 2 mirrored offline quantifier and typicality crossover interaction effects for plausibility ratings and cloze probabilities. We conclude that quantifier expressionscanbe interpreted fully and immediately, though pragmatic and task variables appear to impact the speed and/or depth of quantifier interpretation.
authors.affiliation: Department of Cognitive Science, University of California, San Diego.
authors.forename: Thomas P
authors.initials: TP
authors.lastname: Urbach
authors.affiliation: Department of Cognitive Science, University of California, San Diego.
authors.forename: Katherine A
authors.initials: KA
authors.lastname: DeLong
authors.affiliation: Department of Cognitive Science, University of California, San Diego ; Department of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego.
authors.forename: Marta
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Kutas