title: [Percutaneous coronary intervention vs coronary artery bypass grafting for patients with stable angina pectoris].
abstract: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) must be considered among stable angina pectoris patients who remained symptomatic despite optimal medical treatment and to improve prognosis of patients with large myocardial lschemia when occurring at low workload. PCI is preferred for single coronary artery stenosis, while CABG is recommended for severe multivessel disease patients, particularly when diabetes is present. There is no simple decisional algorithm, and, for patients with multivessel disease, each situation must be debated within a multidisciplinary decision-making team (Heart Team), taking into consideration risks and benefits of PCI vs CABG, patients' comorbidities and local experience.
authors.forename: Victor
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Legrand
mesh_terms: D060050:Angina, Stable / Q000601:surgery*; D017130:Angioplasty / Q000379:methods / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D001026:Coronary Artery Bypass / Q000379:methods / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006801:Humans; D062645:Percutaneous Coronary Intervention / Q000379:methods / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*