title: Reply to Bachmann and Aru.
abstract: A reply to the Bachmann and Aru (2015) critique of our paper (Mack, Erol, & Clarke, 2015) in which we rebut their criticisms and argue once again that our results support our view that iconic memory requires attention.
authors.affiliation: New School for Social Research, United States. Electronic address: mackarie@newschool.edu.
authors.forename: Arien
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Mack
authors.affiliation: New School for Social Research, United States.
authors.forename: Jason
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Clarke
authors.affiliation: New School for Social Research, United States.
authors.forename: Muge
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Erol
mesh_terms: D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology*; D001364:Awareness / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D008568:Memory / Q000502:physiology*; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual / Q000502:physiology*; D011597:Psychomotor Performance / Q000502:physiology*
keywords: Attention; Awareness; Iconic memory