title: Circulating VEGF as a biomarker for diagnosis of ovarian cancer: a systematic review and a meta-analysis.
abstract: VEGF is a frequently studied angiogenic factor in ovarian cancer (OC), and is considered to have an important role in the progression of OC. However, its diagnostic value has not been widely accepted because the conclusions are inconsistent and even conflicting. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic value of VEGF in OC. A systematic literature search was conducted using the PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, and WANFANG databases for relevant published articles (the last search update was November 18, 2014). The diagnosis sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, and the summary receiver operating characteristic curves were pooled by Meta DiSc 1.4 software. A total of ten studies with 1,131 subjects were finally included in this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, and summary receiver operating characteristic curves were 0.67 (0.63-0.73), 0.78 (0.75-0.81), 3.08 (6.36-12.22), 0.39 (0.29-0.51), 9.10 (5.43-45.25), and 0.8175, respectively. Furthermore, to explore the sources of heterogeneity, we conducted subgroup analyses based on ethnicity and sample size. The diagnostic accuracy of VEGF was higher in an Asian population than in a Caucasian population. A similar finding was found in subgroups with the smaller sample size (<100 subjects). In conclusion, the present meta-analysis suggests that VEGF has moderate diagnostic accuracy for OC. Considering our limitations and the heterogeneity among our selected studies, larger, well-designed prospective and multicenter validation studies are needed to evaluate the diagnostic value of serum VEGF for OC.
authors.affiliation: Biochip Center and State Key Lab of Cell Biology, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, People's Republic of China.
authors.forename: Bin
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Liang
authors.affiliation: Biochip Center and State Key Lab of Cell Biology, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, People's Republic of China.
authors.forename: Qun
authors.initials: Q
authors.lastname: He
authors.affiliation: Biochip Center and State Key Lab of Cell Biology, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, People's Republic of China.
authors.forename: Liansheng
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Zhong
authors.affiliation: Biochip Center and State Key Lab of Cell Biology, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, People's Republic of China.
authors.forename: Shaocheng
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Wang
authors.affiliation: Biochip Center and State Key Lab of Cell Biology, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, People's Republic of China.
authors.forename: Zhongcheng
authors.initials: Z
authors.lastname: Pan
authors.affiliation: Biochip Center and State Key Lab of Cell Biology, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, People's Republic of China.
authors.forename: Tianjiao
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Wang
authors.affiliation: Biochip Center and State Key Lab of Cell Biology, China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, People's Republic of China.
authors.forename: Yujie
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Zhao
keywords: blood; diagnosis; gynecological tumor; review