title: [Pay-for-performance in health care services: a review of the best evidence available].
abstract: Pay-for-performance (P4P) has been widely used around the world seeking to improve health outcomes, and in Brazil it is the basis of the National Program for Improving Access and Quality (PMAQ). The literature published between 1998 and January 2013 that evaluated the effectiveness of P4P to produce results or patterns of access and quality in health was scrutinized. A total of 138 studies, with the inclusion of a further 41 studies (14 systematic reviews, 07 clinical trials and 20 observational studies) were retrieved and analyzed Among the more rigorous studies, favorable conclusions for P4P were less frequent, whereas observational studies were more favorable to positive effects of P4P on the quality of, and access to, health services. Methodological limitations of observational studies may have contributed to these results, but the range of results is more linked to the conceptual and contextual aspects of the use of the P4P schemes reviewed, the heterogeneity of P4P models and results. P4P can be helpful in promoting the achievement of objectives in health care systems, especially in the short term and for specific actions requiring less effort of health care providers, but should be used with caution and with a rigorous planning model, also considering undesirable or adverse effects.
authors.affiliation: Centro de Ciências Humanas e Letras, Universidade Federal do Piauí, Teresina, PI, Brasil, jorgeomaia@hotmail.com.
authors.forename: Jorge Otávio Maia
authors.initials: JO
authors.lastname: Barreto
mesh_terms: D001938:Brazil; D006296:Health Services / Q000191:economics*; D006801:Humans; D012052:Reimbursement, Incentive