title: Conditional sentences create a blind spot in theory of mind during narrative comprehension.
abstract: We identify a blind spot in the early Theory of Mind processing of conditional sentences that describe a protagonist's potential action, and its predictable consequences. We propose that such sentences create expectations through two independent channels. A decision theoretic channel creates an expectation that the action will be taken (viz., not taken) if it has desirable (viz., undesirable) consequences, but a structural channel acts in parallel to create an expectation that the action will be taken, irrespective of desirability. Accordingly, reading should be disrupted when a protagonist avoids an action with desirable consequences, but reading should not be disrupted when a protagonist takes an action with undesirable consequences. This prediction was supported by the eye movements of participants reading systematically varied vignettes. Reading was always disrupted when the protagonist avoided an action with desirable consequences, but disruptions were either delayed (Experiment 1) or recovered from faster (Experiment 2) when the protagonist took an action with undesirable consequences.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Northumbria University, United Kingdom. Electronic address: matthew.haigh@northumbria.ac.uk.
authors.forename: Matthew
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Haigh
authors.affiliation: Toulouse School of Economics, Toulouse, France.
authors.forename: Jean-François
authors.initials: JF
authors.lastname: Bonnefon
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D032882:Comprehension / Q000502:physiology*; D005133:Eye Movements / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007802:Language; D008297:Male; D033262:Narration; D011932:Reading; D056345:Theory of Mind / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
keywords: Conditionals; Desire; Discourse comprehension; Eye tracking; Theory of Mind