title: Gesture and word analysis: the same or different processes?
abstract: The present study aimed at determining whether elaboration of communicative signals (symbolic gestures and words) is always accompanied by integration with each other and, if present, this integration can be considered in support of the existence of a same control mechanism. Experiment 1 aimed at determining whether and how gesture is integrated with word. Participants were administered with a semantic priming paradigm with a lexical decision task and pronounced a target word, which was preceded by a meaningful or meaningless prime gesture. When meaningful, the gesture could be either congruent or incongruent with word meaning. Duration of prime presentation (100, 250, 400 ms) randomly varied. Voice spectra, lip kinematics, and time to response were recorded and analyzed. Formant 1 of voice spectra, and mean velocity in lip kinematics increased when the prime was meaningful and congruent with the word, as compared to meaningless gesture. In other words, parameters of voice and movement were magnified by congruence, but this occurred only when prime duration was 250 ms. Time to response to meaningful gesture was shorter in the condition of congruence compared to incongruence. Experiment 2 aimed at determining whether the mechanism of integration of a prime word with a target word is similar to that of a prime gesture with a target word. Formant 1 of the target word increased when word prime was meaningful and congruent, as compared to meaningless congruent prime. Increase was, however, present for whatever prime word duration. Experiment 3 aimed at determining whether symbolic prime gesture comprehension makes use of motor simulation. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation was delivered to left primary motor cortex 100, 250, 500 ms after prime gesture presentation. Motor Evoked Potential of First Dorsal Interosseus increased when stimulation occurred 100 ms post-stimulus. Thus, gesture was understood within 100 ms and integrated with the target word within 250 ms. Experiment 4 excluded any hand motor simulation in order to comprehend prime word. Thus, the same type of integration with a word was present for both prime gesture and word. It was probably successive to understanding of the signal, which used motor simulation for gesture and direct access to semantics for words.
authors.affiliation: Department of Neuroscience, University of Parma, Italy.
authors.forename: Doriana
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: De Marco
authors.affiliation: Department of Neuroscience, University of Parma, Italy.
authors.forename: Elisa
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: De Stefani
authors.affiliation: Department of Neuroscience, University of Parma, Italy. Electronic address: maurizio.gentilucci@unipr.it.
authors.forename: Maurizio
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Gentilucci
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D019054:Evoked Potentials, Motor / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D005868:Gestures; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009044:Motor Cortex / Q000502:physiology*; D011597:Psychomotor Performance / Q000502:physiology; D060865:Repetition Priming / Q000502:physiology; D012660:Semantics; D013068:Speech Production Measurement / Q000379:methods*; D013997:Time Factors; D050781:Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation / Q000379:methods*; D014705:Verbal Behavior / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
keywords: Lexical task; Lip kinematics; Multisensory integration; Prime; Stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA); Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Voice spectra