title: Epistocracy for online deliberative bioethics.
abstract: The suggestion that deliberative democratic approaches would suit the management of bioethical policymaking in democratic pluralistic societies has triggered what has been called the "deliberative turn" in health policy and bioethics. Most of the empirical work in this area has focused on the allocation of healthcare resources and priority setting at the local or national level. The variety of the more or less articulated theoretical efforts behind such initiatives is remarkable and has been accompanied, to date, by an overall lack of method specificity. We propose a set of methodological requirements for online deliberative procedures for bioethics. We provide a theoretical motivation for these requirements. In particular, we discuss and adapt an "epistocratic" proposal and argue that, regardless of its merits as a general political theory, a more refined version of its normative claims can generate a useful framework for the design of bioethical forums that combine maximal inclusiveness with informed and reasonable deliberation.
authors.forename: Giuseppe
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Schiavone
authors.forename: Matteo
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Mameli
authors.forename: Giovanni
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Boniolo
mesh_terms: D026683:Advisory Committees / Q000941:ethics*; D026688:Bioethical Issues; D001675:Bioethics; D003256:Community Participation; D003657:Decision Making / Q000941:ethics*; D003709:Democracy; D006801:Humans; D020407:Internet; D011050:Policy Making; D006113:United Kingdom
keywords: bioethics; deliberative democracy; epistocracy; participation