title: Examining the Predictive Validity of NIH Peer Review Scores.
abstract: The predictive validity of peer review at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) has not yet been demonstrated empirically. It might be assumed that the most efficient and expedient test of the predictive validity of NIH peer review would be an examination of the correlation between percentile scores from peer review and bibliometric indices of the publications produced from funded projects. The present study used a large dataset to examine the rationale for such a study, to determine if it would satisfy the requirements for a test of predictive validity. The results show significant restriction of range in the applications selected for funding. Furthermore, those few applications that are funded with slightly worse peer review scores are not selected at random or representative of other applications in the same range. The funding institutes also negotiate with applicants to address issues identified during peer review. Therefore, the peer review scores assigned to the submitted applications, especially for those few funded applications with slightly worse peer review scores, do not reflect the changed and improved projects that are eventually funded. In addition, citation metrics by themselves are not valid or appropriate measures of scientific impact. The use of bibliometric indices on their own to measure scientific impact would likely increase the inefficiencies and problems with replicability already largely attributed to the current over-emphasis on bibliometric indices. Therefore, retrospective analyses of the correlation between percentile scores from peer review and bibliometric indices of the publications resulting from funded grant applications are not valid tests of the predictive validity of peer review at the NIH.
authors.affiliation: Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Dr., Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
authors.forename: Mark D
authors.initials: MD
authors.lastname: Lindner
authors.affiliation: Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Dr., Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
authors.forename: Richard K
authors.initials: RK
authors.lastname: Nakamura
mesh_terms: D016208:Databases, Factual; D006801:Humans; D009316:National Institutes of Health (U.S.); D017712:Peer Review, Research; D014481:United States