title: Is the practice of public or private sector doctors more evidence-based? A qualitative study from Vellore, India.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The literature on the use of evidence-based practice is sparse, both in the public and private sectors in middle-and low-income countries, and the present literature shows that physician understanding and use of evidence-based practice is poor. The study aimed to explore the perception of medical practitioners in the private for-profit, private not-for-profit and government sectors in Vellore, India, on evidence-based practice, in order to explain the factors affecting the use of evidence-based practice among the practitioners and to inform local policy and management decisions for improvement in quality of care.
  
  
  METHODS
  Qualitative methodology was employed in the study. Sixteen in-depth and two key informant interviews were carried out with medical practitioners selected by purposive sampling in the private for-profit, private not-for-profit and government sectors. The interviews explored participants' knowledge of evidence-based practice, factors affecting its use and possible ways of improving the use of evidence-based practice among physicians in all the health sectors. Data from the in-depth and key informant interviews were analyzed with the NVIVO (version 8) software package using the framework approach.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Although most practitioners interviewed have heard of evidence-based practice, knowledge about evidence-based practice seems inadequate. However, doctors in the private not-for-profit sector seem to be more familiar with the concept of evidence-based practice. Also, practitioners in the private not-for profit sector appear to use medical evidence more in their practices compared to government practitioners or doctors in the private for-profit sector. Perceived factors affecting physician use of evidence-based practice include lack of personal time for literature appraisal as a result of high case load, weak regulatory system, pressure from patients, caregivers and pharmaceutical companies, as well as financial considerations. Opinions of the respondents are that use of evidence-based practice is mostly found among practitioners in the private not-for-profit health sector.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Better training in evidence-based practice, improved regulatory system and greater collaboration between the public, private for-profit and private not-for-profit sectors with regards to training in evidence-based practice - literature search and critical appraisal skills - were suggested as needed to improve the present situation.
authors.affiliation: 1Department of Health Policy and Management, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria 2International Health Group, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, U.K. 3Department of Psychiatry, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
authors.forename: Oluwaseun O
authors.initials: OO
authors.lastname: Akinyemi
authors.forename: Tim
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Martineau
authors.forename: Prathap
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Tharyan
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D055317:Evidence-Based Practice / Q000191:economics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000458:organization & administration*; D005260:Female; D033161:Government Regulation; D006801:Humans; D007194:India; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians' / Q000191:economics / Q000458:organization & administration*; D017149:Private Sector / Q000191:economics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000458:organization & administration*; D017150:Public Sector / Q000191:economics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000458:organization & administration*; D036301:Qualitative Research; D016526:Workload