title: Invited Commentary: Clinical Utility of Prediction Models for Rare Outcomes--The Example of Pancreatic Cancer.
abstract: Translating relative risk estimates into absolute risks is important in evaluating the potential clinical and public health relevance of etiologic discoveries. Predicting high absolute risk is challenging, particularly for rare endpoints such as pancreatic cancer. Recent efforts to develop risk prediction models for pancreatic cancer have found moderate risk levels for very small parts of the population. A new approach in which clinical symptoms and medication use are evaluated in addition to information on risk factors is presented by Risch et al. in this issue of the Journal (Am J Epidemiol. 2015;182(1):26-34). The authors estimated absolute risks based on the relative risks obtained from their case-control study. Their absolute risk estimates were higher than those from previous approaches but remained restricted to a very small proportion of the general population. In the present commentary, we address issues of absolute risk stratification (particularly for rare diseases), specific analytic methods, and how actionable information will differ based on the disease and possible intervention. We suggest that moving from cancer-specific models to broader models used to predict risk for multiple outcomes can make risk prediction for rare diseases more effective. When considering translational goals, it is important to estimate absolute risk at the early stages of etiologic research. The results can be sobering but allow focusing on the most promising goals.
authors.forename: Nicolas
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Wentzensen
authors.forename: Ronald C
authors.initials: RC
authors.lastname: Eldridge
mesh_terms: D002277:Carcinoma / Q000175:diagnosis*; D006801:Humans; D015233:Models, Statistical; D010190:Pancreatic Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis*
keywords: absolute risk; clinical relevance; rare endpoints; risk prediction; risk stratification; translational epidemiology