title: Perception of Teaching and Assessing Technical Proficiency in American College of Veterinary Surgeons Small Animal Surgery Residency Programs.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To determine how American College of Veterinary Surgeons (ACVS) small animal surgery residency programs are teaching and assessing technical skills, and ascertain the perceived value of those methods.
  
  
  METHODS
  Internet-based survey.
  
  
  METHODS
  Residents and Diplomate supervisors of ACVS small animal residency programs.
  
  
  METHODS
  Residents and supervisors were surveyed on their experience of surgery instruction, use of different resources for teaching, type and frequency of feedback, and perceived effectiveness of their programs in imparting technical proficiency.
  
  
  RESULTS
  A total of 130 residents (62%) and 119 supervisors (44%) participated. Both residents and supervisors estimated the resident was the primary surgeon for a mean of 64% of cases, although this proportion varied widely between participants. The majority of residents and supervisors considered that direct intraoperative guidance was the most effective way for residents to develop technical skills. Verbal interactions between supervisor and resident occurred frequently and were highly valued. Regular wet laboratories and access to simulation models were uncommon. Despite over 90% of all participants reporting that a sufficient level of technical aptitude would be attained, only 58% of residents were satisfied with their technical skills training.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Residents relied on direct interaction with supervisors to develop technical skills. The traditional mode of instruction for veterinary residents is the apprenticeship model, which is partly driven by ACVS requirements of supervisory support. Exposure to other teaching and assessment methods was variable. The current structure of residency programs is successful in imparting technical competency as perceived by supervisors and residents. However, consideration of a more formal method of residency training with structured assessment of technical skills as in human medicine should not be dismissed.
authors.affiliation: College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
authors.forename: Stanley E
authors.initials: SE
authors.lastname: Kim
authors.affiliation: College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
authors.forename: J Brad
authors.initials: JB
authors.lastname: Case
authors.affiliation: College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
authors.forename: Daniel D
authors.initials: DD
authors.lastname: Lewis
authors.affiliation: College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
authors.forename: Gary W
authors.initials: GW
authors.lastname: Ellison
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D002983:Clinical Competence / Q000592:standards*; D004520:Education, Veterinary / Q000592:standards* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006801:Humans; D020407:Internet; D007396:Internship and Residency / Q000379:methods*; D066231:Surgeons / Q000592:standards*; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014481:United States; D018634:Veterinarians / Q000592:standards*