title: The Association between Insurance Status and Acceptance of Chlamydia Screening By Teenagers Who Present for Preventive Care Visits.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether providers offer chlamydia screening to teenagers and/or whether screening is accepted at different rates depending on insurance type.
  
  
  METHODS
  Retrospective chart review.
  
  
  METHODS
  Academic center serving urban and suburban patients between April 2009 and October 2011.
  
  
  METHODS
  Nine hundred eighty-three health maintenance visits for asymptomatic, insured female adolescents aged 15-19 years.
  
  
  METHODS
  None.
  
  
  METHODS
  Dichotomous dependent variables of interest indicated whether chlamydia screening was: (1) offered; and (2) accepted. The key independent variable insurance type was coded as 'public' if Medicaid or Medicaid Managed Care and 'private' if a commercial plan. χ(2) and logistic regression analyses were used to assess the significance of differences in screening rates according to insurance type.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Of asymptomatic health-maintenance visits 933 (95%) had a documented sexual history and 339 (34%) had a documented history of sexual activity. After excluding those who had a documented chlamydia screen in the 12 months before the visit (n = 79; 23%), 260 visits met eligibility for chlamydia screening. Only 169 (65%) of eligible visits had chlamydia screening offered and there was no difference in offer of screening according to insurance type. Significantly more visits covered by public insurance had chlamydia screening accepted (98%) than those covered by private insurance (82%). Controlling for demographic factors, the odds of accepted chlamydia screening was 8 times higher in visits covered by public insurance than those with private insurance.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Although publically and privately insured teens were equally likely to be offered chlamydia screening, publically insured teens were significantly more likely to accept screening. Future research should investigate reasons for this difference in screening acceptance. These findings have implications for interventions to improve chlamydia screening because more adolescents are covered by parental insurance under the Affordable Care Act.
authors.affiliation: Department of Pediatrics, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia.
authors.forename: Krupa B
authors.initials: KB
authors.lastname: Playforth
authors.affiliation: Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia.
authors.forename: Alexandria
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Coughlan
authors.affiliation: Department of Pediatrics, Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. Electronic address: kupadhy2@jhmi.edu.
authors.forename: Krishna K
authors.initials: KK
authors.lastname: Upadhya
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D002690:Chlamydia Infections / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000517:prevention & control / Q000523:psychology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D019458:Insurance Coverage; D007348:Insurance, Health; D008484:Medicaid / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D010342:Patient Acceptance of Health Care / Q000523:psychology*; D011314:Preventive Health Services / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012725:Sexual Behavior / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D014481:United States; D055815:Young Adult
keywords: Adolescent health; Preventive screening; Sexually transmitted infections