title: Methodological problems with population cancer studies: The forgotten confounding factors.
abstract: Among clinical physicians it is the population study that is considered to be the "gold standard" of medical evidence concerning acceptable treatments. As new information comes to light concerning the many variables and confounding factors that can affect such studies, many older studies lose much of their original impact. While newer population studies take into consideration a far greater number of confounding factors many are still omitted and a number of these omitted factors can have profound effects on interpretation and validity of the study. In this editorial, I will discuss some of the omitted confounding factors and demonstrate how they can alter the interpretation of these papers and their clinical application.
authors.affiliation: Theoretical Neurosciences Research, LLC Ridgeland, MS 39157, USA.
authors.forename: Russell L
authors.initials: RL
authors.lastname: Blaylock
keywords: Cancer; confounding factors; nutriceuticals; population studies