title: Spine metastases: are minimally invasive surgical techniques living up to the hype?
abstract: Surgery is still considered the mainstay treatment of spine metastases. However, conventional surgery is associated with a high complication rate that may delay the initiation of adjuvant therapies and make some patients not eligible. Minimally invasive surgical techniques have been developed to overcome these drawbacks while providing the same benefits than standard open surgery. In recent years, there has been a flourishing enthusiasm demonstrating the advantages of these various techniques. Although, it is clear that these techniques have greatly improved the treatment of spine metastases, each has its own limitations. In this report, we list the main minimally invasive surgical techniques emphasizing their advantages and drawbacks.
authors.affiliation: Department of Neurosurgery, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France.
authors.forename: Fahed
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Zairi
authors.affiliation: Department of Rheumatology, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France.
authors.forename: Marie-Helene
authors.initials: MH
authors.lastname: Vieillard
authors.affiliation: Department of Neurosurgery, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France.
authors.forename: Richard
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Assaker
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D019060:Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D019635:Neurosurgical Procedures / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D011859:Radiography; D013125:Spinal Neoplasms / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000556:secondary* / Q000601:surgery*
keywords: cryoplasty; kyphoplasty; minimally invasive; percutaneous stabilization; radiofrequency ablation; spine metastases; stereotactic radiosurgery