title: General Surgery Resident Case Logs: Do They Accurately Reflect Resident Experience?
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Operative experience during residency lays the foundation for independent practice and additional specialty training following general surgery residency. The aim of this study was to examine operative experience of general surgery residents and detail the results of an intervention aimed at improving resident record keeping in the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) case log system to better reflect their experience.
  
  
  METHODS
  Residents were asked to characterize variances in recorded operative experience identified through an audit of operative logs. Based on the results of the audit, an intervention was designed to prompt timely record keeping by residents. The intervention included education and discussion of survey audit results, weekly presentation of graphs detailing operative experience, and possible missed cases in the ACGME logs and addition of a first assistant column in morbidity and mortality (M&M) logs.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The audit of case logs identified discrepancies in 24.2% of the 636 cases examined. Chief residents were significantly more accurate (95.9%) in recording operative experience in ACGME case logs, whereas 50.3% of junior resident case logs contained variances. Residents characterized discrepancies as "forgot to log" (9.6%), "staff did the case" (5.2%), "another resident did more of the case" (3.6%), "other" (3.6%), a "more advanced resident was present for the case" (1.6%), "not present for case" (0.6%), and "left for consult" (0.3%). Over the 4-week intervention period, residents logged between 72.7% and 94.0% of cases. A month following the intervention period, we observed a 13.3% increase in recorded cases compared with the intervention period. Review of first assistant case logging following inclusion of a "first assistant" column in M&M logs demonstrated a 70.5% increase in first assistant cases logged into the ACGME system compared with the same time period a year ago.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Based on our results, we found that weekly displays of cases improved resident record keeping in the ACGME case log system, especially by junior residents. We believe that the addition of first assistant column on M&M lists, periodic audits reviewed at conferences, and semiannual evaluations will help junior residents more accurately report their experience during training.
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgery, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
authors.forename: Rachel M
authors.initials: RM
authors.lastname: Nygaard
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgery, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
authors.forename: Samuel R
authors.initials: SR
authors.lastname: Daly
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgery, Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Electronic address: Joan.vancamp@hcmed.org.
authors.forename: Joan M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Van Camp
mesh_terms: D002983:Clinical Competence; D013502:General Surgery / Q000193:education*; D007396:Internship and Residency
keywords: ACGME; Practice-Based Learning and Improvement; Professionalism; Systems-Based Practice; case volume; general surgery residency; graduate medical education; operative experience