title: Classification and Management of Pancreatic Pseudocysts.
abstract: This article aims to elucidate the classification of and optimal treatment for pancreatic pseudocysts. Various approaches, including endoscopic drainage, percutaneous drainage, and open surgery, have been employed for the management of pancreatic pseudocysts. However, no scientific classification of pancreatic pseudocysts has been devised, which could assist in the selection of optimal therapy. We evaluated the treatment modalities used in 893 patients diagnosed with pancreatic pseudocysts according to the revision of the Atlanta classification in our department between 2001 and 2010. All the pancreatic pseudocysts have course of disease >4 weeks and have mature cysts wall detected by computed tomography or transabdominal ultrasonography. Endoscopic drainage, percutaneous drainage, or open surgery was selected on the basis of the pseudocyst characteristics. Clinical data and patient outcomes were reviewed. Among the 893 patients, 13 (1.5%) had percutaneous drainage. Eighty-three (9%) had type I pancreatic pseudocysts and were treated with observation. Ten patients (1%) had type II pseudocysts and underwent the Whipple procedure or resection of the pancreatic body and tail. Forty-six patients (5.2%) had type III pseudocysts: 44 (4.9%) underwent surgical internal drainage and 2 (0.2%) underwent endoscopic drainage. Five hundred six patients (56.7%) had type IV pseudocysts: 297 (33.3%) underwent surgical internal drainage and 209 (23.4%) underwent endoscopic drainage. Finally, 235 patients (26.3%) had type V pseudocysts: 36 (4%) underwent distal pancreatectomy or splenectomy and 199 (22.3%) underwent endoscopic drainage. A new classification system was devised, based on the size, anatomical location, and clinical manifestations of the pancreatic pseudocyst along with the relationship between the pseudocyst and the pancreatic duct. Different therapeutic strategies could be considered based on this classification. When clinically feasible, endoscopic drainage should be considered the optimal management strategy for pancreatic pseudocysts.
authors.affiliation: From the Department of Liver Surgery (GP, K-LX, WL, HW); Department of Pancreatic Surgery (MHW, W-FT); Department of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine (W-MH, X-BL), West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
authors.forename: Gang
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Pan
authors.forename: Mei Hua
authors.initials: MH
authors.lastname: Wan
authors.forename: Kun-Lin
authors.initials: KL
authors.lastname: Xie
authors.forename: Wei
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Li
authors.forename: Wei-Ming
authors.initials: WM
authors.lastname: Hu
authors.forename: Xu-Bao
authors.initials: XB
authors.lastname: Liu
authors.forename: Wen-Fu
authors.initials: WF
authors.lastname: Tang
authors.forename: Hong
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Wu
mesh_terms: D013505:Digestive System Surgical Procedures / Q000379:methods; D004322:Drainage / Q000379:methods; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010192:Pancreatic Pseudocyst / Q000145:classification* / Q000628:therapy*; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000453:epidemiology; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed