title: Breaking bad: The mutagenic effect of DNA repair.
abstract: Species survival depends on the faithful replication of genetic information, which is continually monitored and maintained by DNA repair pathways that correct replication errors and the thousands of lesions that arise daily from the inherent chemical lability of DNA and the effects of genotoxic agents. Nonetheless, neutrally evolving DNA (not under purifying selection) accumulates base substitutions with time (the neutral mutation rate). Thus, repair processes are not 100% efficient. The neutral mutation rate varies both between and within chromosomes. For example it is 10-50 fold higher at CpGs than at non-CpG positions. Interestingly, the neutral mutation rate at non-CpG sites is positively correlated with CpG content. Although the basis of this correlation was not immediately apparent, some bioinformatic results were consistent with the induction of non-CpG mutations by DNA repair at flanking CpG sites. Recent studies with a model system showed that in vivo repair of preformed lesions (mismatches, abasic sites, single stranded nicks) can in fact induce mutations in flanking DNA. Mismatch repair (MMR) is an essential component for repair-induced mutations, which can occur as distant as 5 kb from the introduced lesions. Most, but not all, mutations involved the C of TpCpN (G of NpGpA) which is the target sequence of the C-preferring single-stranded DNA specific APOBEC deaminases. APOBEC-mediated mutations are not limited to our model system: Recent studies by others showed that some tumors harbor mutations with the same signature, as can intermediates in RNA-guided endonuclease-mediated genome editing. APOBEC deaminases participate in normal physiological functions such as generating mutations that inactivate viruses or endogenous retrotransposons, or that enhance immunoglobulin diversity in B cells. The recruitment of normally physiological error-prone processes during DNA repair would have important implications for disease, aging and evolution. This perspective briefly reviews both the bioinformatic and biochemical literature relevant to repair-induced mutagenesis and discusses future directions required to understand the mechanistic basis of this process.
authors.affiliation: School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Building 8, 319 Yueyang Road, Shanghai 200031, China.
authors.forename: Jia
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Chen
authors.affiliation: Section on Genomic Structure and Function, Laboratory of Cell and Molecular Biology, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Building 8, Room 203, 8 Center Drive, MSC 0830, Bethesda, MD 20892-0830, USA. Electronic address: avf@helix.nih.gov.
authors.forename: Anthony V
authors.initials: AV
authors.lastname: Furano
mesh_terms: D000071479:APOBEC-1 Deaminase; D020137:Base Pair Mismatch; D001483:Base Sequence; D018899:CpG Islands; D003564:Cytidine Deaminase / Q000235:genetics* / Q000378:metabolism; D053843:DNA Mismatch Repair; D004277:DNA, Single-Stranded / Q000737:chemistry* / Q000378:metabolism; D015870:Gene Expression; D015894:Genome, Human; D006801:Humans; D008969:Molecular Sequence Data; D016296:Mutagenesis; D009154:Mutation
chemical_list: D004277:DNA, Single-Stranded; D000071479:APOBEC-1 Deaminase; C000605089:APOBEC1 protein, human; D003564:Cytidine Deaminase
keywords: APOBEC deaminase; Base excision repair; CRISPR/Cas; Cancer; DNA repair; Mismatch repair; Mutagenesis