title: Are child-directed interactions the cradle of social learning?
abstract: Theorists have proposed that child-directed, ostensive interactions provide a critical point of entry for supporting children's learning from others, either because they render the intentions of a teacher easier to understand (e.g., Barresi & Moore, 1996; Moore, 2010; Tomasello, 1999) or because they mark information as culturally important and generalizable (e.g., Csibra & Gergely, 2009). This article evaluates these proposals in light of data from U.S. and European children, as well as from communities where directed interactions with young children are rare. The evidence reviewed from both bodies of work leave reason to doubt the claim that directed interactions provide automatic and innate informational value for learners. Instead, the value of child-directed teaching contexts likely stems from 2 factors: how these interactions focus children's attention in the moment, and how children learn to reason pragmatically regarding the value child-directed contexts have.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Chicago.
authors.forename: Laura
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Shneidman
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Chicago.
authors.forename: Amanda L
authors.initials: AL
authors.lastname: Woodward
mesh_terms: D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology; D002675:Child, Preschool; D003071:Cognition / Q000502:physiology*; D003142:Communication; D003469:Culture; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D018730:Infant Behavior / Q000523:psychology*; D033182:Intention; D008297:Male; D000067404:Social Communication Disorder / Q000523:psychology; D000067570:Social Learning / Q000502:physiology*