title: Do alumina matrix composite bearings decrease hip noises and bearing fractures at a minimum of 5 years after THA?
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Ceramic-on-ceramic bearing couples are theoretically attractive in total hip arthroplasty (THA) because of low wear, but concerns regarding ceramic fracture and squeaking have arisen. Improved material properties of newer alumina matrix composite (AMC) materials, known as Delta ceramics, may reduce these risks. In addition, the use of thinner liners and larger femoral heads may be helpful clinically to lower the rate of dislocation. However, limited short-term clinical results are available and intermediate-term effects are unclear.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  (1) What is the frequency of bearing-related complications (dissociation, fracture, and noise) with ceramic-on-ceramic AMC bearings in cementless THA? (2) What other complications arose in patients treated with these bearings? (3) What are the Harris hip scores (HHS) and survivorship free from reoperation and revision at a minimum of 5 years after cementless THA performed with AMC bearings?
  
  
  METHODS
  Over a 9-month period in 2009, one surgeon performed 125 THAs, of which 100 (80% of the total) were performed with cementless, AMC bearings. During the period in question, the exclusion criteria for this implant were primary THAs with severe acetabular or femoral bone defect and revision THAs. Of these, 94 hips (95%) in 91 patients were available for analysis at a minimum of 5 years (range, 5-6 years), because five patients (six hips) had died. Mean age at the time of arthroplasty was 55 ± 14 years. Prostheses with an identical design and Biolox(®) Delta ceramics were used in all patients. Noise was classified into squeaking, clicking, grinding, and popping. Ceramic fracture, dislocation, and any other complications associated with the use of AMC ceramics were also investigated. Clinical evaluation included the modified HHS preoperatively and at each followup. Survivorship free from reoperation and revision was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Of 91 patients, four developed bearing-related complications, including one with liner dissociation despite initial square seating and three with clicking. No patients had ceramic fractures. A single event of perioperative dislocation occurred in one patient and postoperative periprosthetic fracture occurred in two hips. Mean HHS improved from 56 to 93 points at the final followup (p < 0.001). Survivorship at 5 years free from reoperation and revision was 96.8% and 97.9%, respectively.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Improved material properties combined with the possible use of larger diameter heads make AMC ceramics a promising alternative bearing option with seemingly comparable clinical outcomes reported by others with conventional ceramic bearings. Despite these encouraging results, however, meticulous technical precautions such as square seating and proper impaction in particular should be taken during liner insertion, because we did observe one liner dissociation and several patients with hip noises.
  
  
  METHODS
  Level IV, therapeutic study.
authors.affiliation: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kyungpook National University Hospital, 130, Dongdeok-ro, Jung-Gu, Daegu, 700-721, Korea.
authors.forename: Seung-Hoon
authors.initials: SH
authors.lastname: Baek
authors.affiliation: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kyungpook National University Hospital, 130, Dongdeok-ro, Jung-Gu, Daegu, 700-721, Korea.
authors.forename: Won Keun
authors.initials: WK
authors.lastname: Kim
authors.affiliation: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kyungpook National University Hospital, 130, Dongdeok-ro, Jung-Gu, Daegu, 700-721, Korea.
authors.forename: Jun Young
authors.initials: JY
authors.lastname: Kim
authors.affiliation: Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kyungpook National University Hospital, 130, Dongdeok-ro, Jung-Gu, Daegu, 700-721, Korea. syukim@knu.ac.kr.
authors.forename: Shin-Yoon
authors.initials: SY
authors.lastname: Kim
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000537:Aluminum Oxide; D019644:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / Q000009:adverse effects* / Q000295:instrumentation*; D018572:Disease-Free Survival; D005260:Female; D006617:Hip Dislocation / Q000209:etiology; D006621:Hip Joint / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery*; D006622:Hip Prosthesis; D006801:Humans; D053208:Kaplan-Meier Estimate; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009622:Noise / Q000517:prevention & control*; D057068:Periprosthetic Fractures / Q000209:etiology; D011474:Prosthesis Design; D011475:Prosthesis Failure; D011859:Radiography; D012086:Reoperation; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012307:Risk Factors; D013314:Stress, Mechanical; D013997:Time Factors; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D055815:Young Adult
chemical_list: D000537:Aluminum Oxide