title: Peer Review Evaluation Process of Marie Curie Actions under EU's Seventh Framework Programme for Research.
abstract: We analysed the peer review of grant proposals under Marie Curie Actions, a major EU research funding instrument, which involves two steps: an independent assessment (Individual Evaluation Report, IER) performed remotely by 3 raters, and a consensus opinion reached during a meeting by the same raters (Consensus Report, CR). For 24,897 proposals evaluated from 2007 to 2013, the association between average IER and CR scores was very high across different panels, grant calls and years. Median average deviation (AD) index, used as a measure of inter-rater agreement, was 5.4 points on a 0-100 scale (interquartile range 3.4-8.3), overall, demonstrating a good general agreement among raters. For proposals where one rater disagreed with the other two raters (n=1424; 5.7%), or where all 3 raters disagreed (n=2075; 8.3%), the average IER and CR scores were still highly associated. Disagreement was more frequent for proposals from Economics/Social Sciences and Humanities panels. Greater disagreement was observed for proposals with lower average IER scores. CR scores for proposals with initial disagreement were also significantly lower. Proposals with a large absolute difference between the average IER and CR scores (≥10 points; n=368, 1.5%) generally had lower CR scores. An inter-correlation matrix of individual raters' scores of evaluation criteria of proposals indicated that these scores were, in general, a reflection of raters' overall scores. Our analysis demonstrated a good internal consistency and general high agreement among raters. Consensus meetings appear to be relevant for particular panels and subsets of proposals with large differences among raters' scores.
authors.affiliation: Research Executive Agency, European Commission, Brussels, Belgium.
authors.forename: David G
authors.initials: DG
authors.lastname: Pina
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Split, Split, Croatia.
authors.forename: Darko
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Hren
authors.affiliation: Department of Research in Biomedicine and Health, School of Medicine, University of Split, Split, Croatia.
authors.forename: Ana
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Marušić
mesh_terms: D005381:Financing, Organized / Q000592:standards; D006801:Humans; D017712:Peer Review, Research / Q000592:standards*; D012108:Research Personnel / Q000592:standards*