title: So if we like the idea of peer workers, why aren't we seeing more?
abstract: The employment of peer support workers is widely encouraged in recovery-oriented mental health systems and services, providing a tangible example of how to translate recovery values and principles into actions. In Scotland, despite a long-term policy commitment to recovery approaches, the creation of peer worker roles has been slow and patchy. This paper describes findings from a study on the levers and barriers to the development of peer worker roles in two Scottish health board areas. Findings suggest that new evidence on effective implementation and cost effectiveness should be prioritised to support potentially complex role development in times of reduced resources. We argue that additional evidence on effectiveness is unlikely, by itself, to lead to country-wide employment of peer workers. We therefore suggest that a policy commitment to peer working would be reinforced by not only a strengthened evidence base but also strengthened accountability mechanisms. In the absence of such accountability, decision-makers and planners might reasonably continue to ask "why bother"?
authors.affiliation: Jacki Gordon, Jacki Gordon + Associates, Glasgow G44 3TE, Scotland, United Kingdom.
authors.forename: Jacki
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Gordon
authors.affiliation: Jacki Gordon, Jacki Gordon + Associates, Glasgow G44 3TE, Scotland, United Kingdom.
authors.forename: Simon
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Bradstreet
keywords: Mental health policy; Peer support; Recovery; Role adoption; Workforce development