title: (No) time for control: Frontal theta dynamics reveal the cost of temporally guided conflict anticipation.
abstract: During situations of response conflict, cognitive control is characterized by prefrontal theta-band (3- to 8-Hz) activity. It has been shown that cognitive control can be triggered proactively by contextual cues that predict conflict. Here, we investigated whether a pretrial preparation interval could serve as such a cue. This would show that the temporal contingencies embedded in the task can be used to anticipate upcoming conflict. To this end, we recorded electroencephalography (EEG) from 30 human subjects while they performed a version of a Simon task in which the duration of a fixation cross between trials predicted whether the next trial would contain response conflict. Both their behavior and EEG activity showed a consistent but unexpected pattern of results: The conflict effect (increased reaction times and decreased accuracy on conflict as compared to nonconflict trials) was stronger when conflict was cued, and this was associated with stronger conflict-related midfrontal theta activity and functional connectivity. Interestingly, intervals that predicted conflict did show a pretarget increase in midfrontal theta power. These findings suggest that temporally guided expectations of conflict do heighten conflict anticipation, but also lead to less efficiently applied reactive control. We further explored this post-hoc interpretation by means of three behavioral follow-up experiments, in which we used nontemporal cues, semantically informative cues, and neutral cues. Together, this body of results suggests that the counterintuitive cost of conflict cueing may not be uniquely related to the temporal domain, but may instead be related to the implicitness and validity of the cue.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, 1018 XA, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. joramvandriel@gmail.com.|Amsterdam Brain and Cognition, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. joramvandriel@gmail.com.|Department of Cognitive Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. joramvandriel@gmail.com.
authors.forename: Joram
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: van Driel
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, 1018 XA, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.|Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
authors.forename: Jennifer C
authors.initials: JC
authors.lastname: Swart
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology and Neuroscience and Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
authors.forename: Tobias
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Egner
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, 1018 XA, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.|Amsterdam Brain and Cognition, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
authors.forename: K Richard
authors.initials: KR
authors.lastname: Ridderinkhof
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, 1018 XA, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
authors.forename: Michael X
authors.initials: MX
authors.lastname: Cohen
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000513:Alpha Rhythm / Q000502:physiology; D059031:Anticipation, Psychological / Q000502:physiology*; D003220:Conflict, Psychological; D003463:Cues; D004569:Electroencephalography; D005260:Female; D005625:Frontal Lobe / Q000502:physiology*; D007839:Functional Laterality; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009483:Neuropsychological Tests; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D013826:Theta Rhythm / Q000502:physiology*; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology; D055815:Young Adult
keywords: Cognitive control; Functional connectivity; Oscillatory dynamics; Timing