title: Cryptic or pseudocryptic: can morphological methods inform copepod taxonomy? An analysis of publications and a case study of the Eurytemora affinis species complex.
abstract: Interest in cryptic species has increased significantly with current progress in genetic methods. The large number of cryptic species suggests that the resolution of traditional morphological techniques may be insufficient for taxonomical research. However, some species now considered to be cryptic may, in fact, be designated pseudocryptic after close morphological examination. Thus the "cryptic or pseudocryptic" dilemma speaks to the resolution of morphological analysis and its utility for identifying species. We address this dilemma first by systematically reviewing data published from 1980 to 2013 on cryptic species of Copepoda and then by performing an in-depth morphological study of the former Eurytemora affinis complex of cryptic species. Analyzing the published data showed that, in 5 of 24 revisions eligible for systematic review, cryptic species assignment was based solely on the genetic variation of forms without detailed morphological analysis to confirm the assignment. Therefore, some newly described cryptic species might be designated pseudocryptic under more detailed morphological analysis as happened with Eurytemora affinis complex. Recent genetic analyses of the complex found high levels of heterogeneity without morphological differences; it is argued to be cryptic. However, next detailed morphological analyses allowed to describe a number of valid species. Our study, using deep statistical analyses usually not applied for new species describing, of this species complex confirmed considerable differences between former cryptic species. In particular, fluctuating asymmetry (FA), the random variation of left and right structures, was significantly different between forms and provided independent information about their status. Our work showed that multivariate statistical approaches, such as principal component analysis, can be powerful techniques for the morphological discrimination of cryptic taxons. Despite increasing cryptic species designations, morphological techniques have great potential in determining copepod taxonomy.
authors.affiliation: Saint-Petersburg State University Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
authors.forename: Dmitry
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Lajus
authors.affiliation: Zoological Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
authors.forename: Natalia
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Sukhikh
authors.affiliation: Zoological Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
authors.forename: Victor
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Alekseev
keywords: Cryptic species; Eurytemora affinis; Eurytemora carolleeae. Eurytemora caspica; fluctuating asymmetry; morphological variation; principal component analysis; pseudocryptic species