title: Outcome measures in neuromuscular disease: is the world still flat?
abstract: Valid, responsive, and meaningful outcome measures for the measurement of the impairment, activity limitations, and quality of life in patients with neuromuscular disease are crucial to identify the natural history of disease and benefits of therapy in clinical practice and trials. Although understanding of many aspects of neuromuscular diseases has advanced dramatically, the development of outcome measures has received less attention. The scales developed from Rasch theory by the PeriNomS Group represent the biggest significant shift in thought in neuromuscular outcome measures for decades. There remain problems with many of them, and further developments are required. However, incorporating them into our outcome sets for daily use and in clinical trials will lead to the more efficient capture of meaningful change and will result in better assessment of individuals and groups of patients in both clinical trials and neurological practice.
authors.affiliation: Centre for Neuromuscular Disease, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK.
authors.forename: Michael P
authors.initials: MP
authors.lastname: Lunn
authors.affiliation: Neuromuscular Reference Centre UCL St-Luc, University Hospitals St-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
authors.forename: Peter Y K
authors.initials: PY
authors.lastname: Van den Bergh
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D009468:Neuromuscular Diseases / Q000628:therapy*; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care
keywords: Rasch; anchoring; cognitive bias; knowledge; outcome measures