title: Is there a "magic" hemoglobin number? Clinical decision support promoting restrictive blood transfusion practices.
abstract: Blood transfusion has been identified as one of the most frequently performed therapeutic procedures, with a significant percentage of transfusions identified to be inappropriate. Recent key clinical trials in adults have provided Level 1 evidence to support restrictive red blood cell (RBC) transfusion practices. However, some advocates have attempted to identify a "correct" Hb threshold for RBC transfusion; whereas others assert that management of anemia, including transfusion decisions, must take into account clinical patient variables, rather than simply one diagnostic laboratory test. The heterogeneity of guidelines for blood transfusion by a number of medical societies reflects this controversy. Clinical decision support (CDS) uses a Hb threshold number in a smart Best Practices Alert (BPA) upon physician order, to trigger a concurrent utilization self-review for whether blood transfusion therapy is appropriate. This review summarizes Level 1 evidence in seven key clinical trials in adults that support restrictive transfusion practices, along strategies made possible by CDS that have demonstrated value in improving blood utilization by promoting restrictive transfusion practices.
authors.affiliation: Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, California.|Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
authors.forename: Lawrence Tim
authors.initials: LT
authors.lastname: Goodnough
authors.affiliation: Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
authors.forename: Neil
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Shah
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001803:Blood Transfusion; D006454:Hemoglobins / Q000032:analysis*; D006801:Humans; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic
chemical_list: D006454:Hemoglobins