title: Consensus at the Heart of Division: Commentary on Norton and Ariely (2011).
abstract: We argue that seemingly deep-seated partisan divisions may be built on a foundation of surprising consensus, not only in terms of the wealth distributions that people prefer (Norton & Ariely, 2011, this issue), but also in the gut-level moral reactions and beliefs about money and happiness that may underlie those preferences.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
authors.forename: Elizabeth W
authors.initials: EW
authors.lastname: Dunn
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychological Studies, Hong Kong Institute of Education, Tai Po, Hong Kong.
authors.forename: Emma E
authors.initials: EE
authors.lastname: Buchtel
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada laknin@psych.ubc.ca.
authors.forename: Lara B
authors.initials: LB
authors.lastname: Aknin
keywords: consensus; happiness; income; moral reactions; predictions