title: Genetic Counselors' Judgments of Patient Concerns: Concordance and Consequences.
abstract: The aims of this prospective study were to determine (a) the concordance between patient concerns and genetic counselors' judgments of these concerns, (b) the predictors of patient and counselor judgments, and (c) the relationship between concordance and patient outcomes. Patients' and counselors' views were sought before and after 131 routine genetic consultations. Before consultations, there was concordance about level of patient concern to within one point in 63% (82/131) of consultations and about type of patient concern in 60-84% of consultations. Lack of concordance in judging level and type of concern was associated with lower satisfaction with information and higher anxiety after the consultation. The biggest predictor of counselor judgment of concern was professional background: doctors judged patients to be more concerned than did nurses. Concordance of concern was predicted by counselors' experience in genetics: less experienced counselors overestimated patient concern. Future research needs to determine whether improving judgment of concern improves patient outcome.
authors.affiliation: Psychology and Genetics Research Group, United Medical and Dental Schools of Guy's and St. Thomas's, Fifth Floor, Thomas Guy House, Guy's Campus, London, SE1 9RT, U.K.
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Michie
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Weinman
authors.forename: T M
authors.initials: TM
authors.lastname: Marteau