title: To Use or Not to Use: The Prenatal Genetic Technology/Worry Conundrum.
abstract: We conducted an exploratory, qualitative study investigating the factors influencing the use of genetic counseling and prenatal genetic testing for two groups: pregnant women 35 years of age and over (AMA) at the time of delivery and pregnant women with an abnormal maternal serum triple screen (MSAFP3). The convenience sample consisted of 25 semistructured interviews of women/couples and 50 observations of genetic counseling sessions. Worry turned out to be the most important variable influencing decision making about prenatal genetic testing and was greater in the MSAFP3 group than in the AMA group. The women in the AMA group appeared to assign the risk of having a child with Down syndrome to their age category rather than to themselves individually, whereas, the risk perception for women with an abnormal MSAFP3 appeared to have shifted from a general population risk for pregnant women to an individual, personal risk. There was a general lack of understanding and also more misinformation about the MSAFP3 screen compared to amniocentesis. Women in both groups were torn between fear of an invasive test and worry about the health of their fetus for the rest of their pregnancy if they did not undergo amniocentesis.
authors.affiliation: Department of Sociology and Anthropology, The College of New Jersey, Ewing, NJ, kenen@tcnj.edu.
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Kenen
authors.forename: A C
authors.initials: AC
authors.lastname: Smith
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Watkins
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Zuber-Pittore