title: Rewarding Replications: A Sure and Simple Way to Improve Psychological Science.
abstract: Although replications are vital to scientific progress, psychologists rarely engage in systematic replication efforts. In this article, we consider psychologists' narrative approach to scientific publications as an underlying reason for this neglect and propose an incentive structure for replications within psychology. First, researchers need accessible outlets for publishing replications. To accomplish this, psychology journals could publish replication reports in files that are electronically linked to reports of the original research. Second, replications should get cited. This can be achieved by cociting replications along with original research reports. Third, replications should become a valued collaborative effort. This can be realized by incorporating replications in teaching programs and by stimulating adversarial collaborations. The proposed incentive structure for replications can be developed in a relatively simple and cost-effective manner. By promoting replications, this incentive structure may greatly enhance the dependability of psychology's knowledge base.
authors.affiliation: VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands SL.Koole@psy.vu.nl.
authors.forename: Sander L
authors.initials: SL
authors.lastname: Koole
authors.affiliation: University of Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
authors.forename: Daniël
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Lakens
keywords: philosophy of science; publication bias; replication; scientific fraud; selective reporting