title: Bayesian Versus Orthodox Statistics: Which Side Are You On?
abstract: Researchers are often confused about what can be inferred from significance tests. One problem occurs when people apply Bayesian intuitions to significance testing-two approaches that must be firmly separated. This article presents some common situations in which the approaches come to different conclusions; you can see where your intuitions initially lie. The situations include multiple testing, deciding when to stop running participants, and when a theory was thought of relative to finding out results. The interpretation of nonsignificant results has also been persistently problematic in a way that Bayesian inference can clarify. The Bayesian and orthodox approaches are placed in the context of different notions of rationality, and I accuse myself and others as having been irrational in the way we have been using statistics on a key notion of rationality. The reader is shown how to apply Bayesian inference in practice, using free online software, to allow more coherent inferences from data.
authors.affiliation: School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom dienes@sussex.ac.uk.
authors.forename: Zoltan
authors.initials: Z
authors.lastname: Dienes
keywords: Bayes; evidence; likelihood principle; significance testing; statistical inference