title: Stentoplasty effectiveness and safety for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a systematic review.
abstract: To assess the effectiveness and safety of stentoplasty in people with osteoporotic vertebral body fractures. A systematic search of databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane library, between others, was conducted to June 9, 2014. Clinical trials and observational studies that included alive adults with osteoporotic vertebral body fractures and the comparators were the intervention himself, vertebroplasty or balloon kyphoplasty were selected. Quality of evidence was graded according to the GRADE approach. Two review authors independently selected studies, assessed risk of bias and extracted data. Forty-two citations were identified during the search. After removing duplicates, five studies were included: two clinical trials and three observational studies. Stentoplasty, showed higher rate of adverse events related to material (P=0.043) and cuff pressure (P=0.014) in comparison to kyphoplasty. There was no difference between two procedures in terms of reduction of kyphosis, time of exposure to radiation or postoperative loss of cement. Stentoplasty in comparison to vertebroplasty, showed an improvement of restoration of vertebral height (P=0.042), kyphosis correction and volume of bone cement. No differences were found between two procedures in terms of loss of vertebral body volume. Based on observational studies, stentoplasty improved vertebral height, pain and functional disability at 6 and 12months follow-up, and corrected the angle vertebral fractures in patients with osteoporotic vertebral body. Stentoplasty was presented as a safe procedure in short-medium term, with a low complication rate, a reduced loss of cement and new vertebral body fractures lower rates. Stentoplasty improves vertebral height, reduces the pain and functional disability and correct the vertebral angle in patients with osteoporotic vertebral body fracture with minimum adverse events. Stentoplasty is comparable to kyphoplasty in terms of correction of kyphosis, time of exposure to radiation and cement postoperative loss, and comparable to vertebroplasty in terms of restoration of vertebral height correction and bone cement volume.
  
  
  METHODS
  Level II systematic review.
authors.affiliation: Andalusian Agency for Health Technology Assessment, Avda. de la Innovación s/n. Edificio ARENA 1. Planta baja, ES-41020 Sevilla, Spain. Electronic address: esther.martin.lopez.sspa@juntadeandalucia.es.
authors.forename: J E
authors.initials: JE
authors.lastname: Martín-López
authors.affiliation: Health Management Sevilla South, avenue Bellavista, Seville, Spain.
authors.forename: M J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Pavón-Gómez
authors.affiliation: Andalusian Agency for Health Technology Assessment, Avda. de la Innovación s/n. Edificio ARENA 1. Planta baja, ES-41020 Sevilla, Spain.
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Romero-Tabares
authors.affiliation: Andalusian Agency for Health Technology Assessment, Avda. de la Innovación s/n. Edificio ARENA 1. Planta baja, ES-41020 Sevilla, Spain.
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Molina-López
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D058498:Kyphoplasty; D058866:Osteoporotic Fractures / Q000601:surgery*; D010146:Pain / Q000601:surgery; D016103:Spinal Fractures / Q000601:surgery*; D015607:Stents
keywords: Kyphoplasty; Osteoporosis; Prostheses and implants; Stentoplasty; Vertebral fracture; Vertebroplasty