title: The Social Value of Knowledge and International Clinical Research.
abstract: In light of the growth in the conduct of international clinical research in developing populations, this paper seeks to explore what is owed to developing world communities who host international clinical research. Although existing paradigms for assigning and assessing benefits to host communities offer valuable insight, I criticize their failure to distinguish between those benefits which can justify the conduct of research in a developing world setting and those which cannot. I argue that the justification for human subjects research is fundamentally grounded in the social value of knowledge, and that this value is context-dependent in a manner which should inform our ethical evaluation of the conduct of research in specific settings. I propose a new framework for the assessment of research benefits assigned to developing world host communities, a natural implication of which is to limit the types of research projects which may permissibly be conducted in developing world settings.
authors.forename: Danielle M
authors.initials: DM
authors.lastname: Wenner
mesh_terms: D035843:Biomedical Research / Q000941:ethics*; D002986:Clinical Trials as Topic / Q000941:ethics* / Q000379:methods; D055812:Community-Based Participatory Research / Q000941:ethics*; D003906:Developing Countries; D004345:Drug Industry / Q000191:economics / Q000941:ethics / Q000706:statistics & numerical data* / Q000639:trends; D032984:Ethics, Research; D014943:Global Health; D006297:Health Services Accessibility / Q000941:ethics* / Q000592:standards; D064368:Healthy Volunteers; D006801:Humans; D007391:International Cooperation; D019359:Knowledge; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D035842:Research Subjects; D012935:Social Justice; D012945:Social Values
keywords: clinical trials; developing world bioethics; international justice; knowledge; research ethics