title: Are summary statistics enough? Evidence for the importance of shape in guiding visual search.
abstract: Peripheral vision outside the focus of attention may rely on summary statistics. We used a gaze-contingent paradigm to directly test this assumption by asking whether search performance differed between targets and statistically-matched visualizations of the same targets. Four-object search displays included one statistically-matched object that was replaced by an unaltered version of the object during the first eye movement. Targets were designated by previews, which were never altered. Two types of statistically-matched objects were tested: One that maintained global shape and one that did not. Differences in guidance were found between targets and statistically-matched objects when shape was not preserved, suggesting that they were not informationally equivalent. Responses were also slower after target fixation when shape was not preserved, suggesting an extrafoveal processing of the target that again used shape information. We conclude that summary statistics must include some global shape information to approximate the peripheral information used during search.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, USA.
authors.forename: Robert G
authors.initials: RG
authors.lastname: Alexander
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, USA ; Institute for Mind and Brain, University of South Carolina, USA.
authors.forename: Joseph
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Schmidt
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, USA ; Department of Computer Science, Stony Brook University, USA.
authors.forename: Gregory J
authors.initials: GJ
authors.lastname: Zelinsky
keywords: Extrafoveal processing; Eye movements; Gaze contingent; Shape; Summary statistics; Visual search guidance