title: Why It Matters: The Implications of Autonomous Processes for Dual Process Theories-Commentary on Evans & Stanovich (2013).
abstract: Evans and Stanovich (2013, this issue) propose that Type 1 processes should be defined in terms of autonomy, such that they are initiated and run to completion in the presence of relevant triggering conditions. In this commentary, I argue that their autonomous execution has implications for the nature of the representation that is formed and for the shape and outcome of subsequent Type 2 processes. In addition, I argue that Type 2 processes may also be triggered automatically, but that, unlike Type 1 processes, their completion requires working memory resources, and that the outcome of those processes is more flexible than that of Type 1 processes.
authors.affiliation: University of Saskatchewan valerie.thompson@usask.ca.
authors.forename: Valerie A
authors.initials: VA
authors.lastname: Thompson
keywords: autonomous processes; dual-process theories; reasoning; working memory