title: Morality and politics: Comparing alternate theories.
abstract: Debates about the American "culture wars" have led scholars to develop several theories relating morality to political attitudes and behaviors. However, researchers have not adequately compared these theories, nor have they examined the overall contribution of morality to explaining political variation. This study uses nationally representative data to compare the utility of 19 moral constructs from four research traditions - associated with the work of Hunter, Lakoff, Haidt, and Schwartz - for predicting political orientation (liberalism/conservatism). Results indicate that morality explains a third of the variation in political orientation - more than basic demographic and religious predictors - but that no one theory provides a fully adequate explanation of this phenomenon. Instead, political orientation is best predicted by selected moral constructs that are unique to each of the four traditions, and by two moral constructs that crosscut them. Future work should investigate how these moral constructs can be synthesized to create a more comprehensive theory of morality and politics.
authors.affiliation: University of Toronto, Canada.
authors.forename: Andrew
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Miles
authors.affiliation: Duke University, United States.
authors.forename: Stephen
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Vaisey
mesh_terms: D001290:Attitude; D003469:Culture; D034462:Dissent and Disputes; D006801:Humans; D009014:Morals; D011057:Politics; D012945:Social Values; D014481:United States
keywords: Conservatism; Hunter; Lakoff; Liberalism; Moral absolutism; Moral foundations theory; Morality; Political orientation; Politics; Values