title: Balancing Conservation with National Development: A Socio-Economic Case Study of the Alternatives to the Serengeti Road.
abstract: Developing countries often have rich natural resources but poor infrastructure to capitalize on them, which leads to significant challenges in terms of balancing poverty alleviation with conservation. The underlying premise in development strategies is to increase the socio-economic welfare of the people while simultaneously ensuring environmental sustainability, however these objectives are often in direct conflict. National progress is dependent on developing infrastructure such as effective transportation networks, however roads can be ecologically catastrophic in terms of disrupting habitat connectivity and facilitating illegal activity. How can national development and conservation be balanced? The proposed Serengeti road epitomizes the conflict between poverty alleviation on one hand, and the conservation of a critical ecosystem on the other. We use the Serengeti as an exemplar case-study in which the relative economic and social benefits of a road can be assessed against the ecological impacts. Specifically, we compare three possible transportation routes and ask which route maximizes the socio-economic returns for the people while minimizing the ecological costs. The findings suggest that one route in particular that circumnavigates the Serengeti links the greatest number of small and medium sized entrepreneurial businesses to the largest labour force in the region. Furthermore, this route connects the most children to schools, provisions the greatest access to hospitals, and opens the most fertile crop and livestock production areas, and does not compromise the ecology and tourism revenue of the Serengeti. This route would improve Tanzania's food security and self-reliance and would facilitate future infrastructure development which would not be possible if the road were to pass through the Serengeti. This case study provides a compelling example of how a detailed spatial analysis can balance the national objectives of poverty alleviation while maintaining ecological integrity.
authors.affiliation: Boyd Orr Centre for Population and Ecosystem Health; Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, United Kingdom.
authors.forename: J Grant C
authors.initials: JG
authors.lastname: Hopcraft
authors.affiliation: Frankfurt Zoological Society, Box 14935, Arusha, Tanzania.
authors.forename: Gerald
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Bigurube
authors.affiliation: Parliamentary Committee on Land, Natural Resources and Environment, Tanzania, P.O. Box 1065, Kahama, Tanzania.
authors.forename: James Daudi
authors.initials: JD
authors.lastname: Lembeli
authors.affiliation: Boyd Orr Centre for Population and Ecosystem Health; Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, United Kingdom; Frankfurt Zoological Society, Box 14935, Arusha, Tanzania.
authors.forename: Markus
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Borner
mesh_terms: D003247:Conservation of Natural Resources / Q000379:methods*; D057217:Economic Development; D017753:Ecosystem; D006801:Humans; D012922:Social Change; D013636:Tanzania; D014186:Transportation