title: Caloric restriction for treatment of geriatric obesity: Do the benefits outweigh the risks?
abstract: Most evidence for the health benefits of prescribing caloric restriction (CR) for weight loss is derived from randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) in young/middle-aged adults; there are very few RCTs in older adults in which the isolated effects of CR can be deciphered. The purpose of this review is to summarize the RCT evidence of the benefits (and potential risks) of CR for the treatment of obesity in older adults. We identified only 19 published papers from 10 RCTs ranging from 3 to 18 months that met the criteria of independent effects of a CR component and were conducted in adults with a mean age ≥65 yrs. Overall, the results show a beneficial treatment effect for improving some metabolic, functional and body composition outcomes with few documented risks. However, all outcomes were assessed immediately after treatment cessation. Thus, until additional scientifically rigorous evidence with long-term follow-up is available, the risk-to-benefit ratio of CR for the treatment of obesity in older adults remains unclear.
authors.affiliation: Section on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
authors.forename: Eve
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Normandin
authors.affiliation: Section on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
authors.forename: Denise K
authors.initials: DK
authors.lastname: Houston
authors.affiliation: Section on Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
authors.forename: Barbara J
authors.initials: BJ
authors.lastname: Nicklas
keywords: Body Composition; Caloric restriction; Obesity; Older adults; Overweight; Physical Function; Randomized Clinical trial; Weight loss