title: Subliminal presentation of emotionally negative vs positive primes increases the perceived beauty of target stimuli.
abstract: Emotions have a profound influence on aesthetic experiences. Studies using affective priming procedures demonstrate, for example, that inducing a conscious negative emotional state biases the perception of abstract stimuli towards the sublime (Eskine et al. Emotion 12:1071-1074, 2012. doi: 10.1037/a0027200). Moreover, subliminal happy facial expressions have a positive impact on the aesthetic evaluation of abstract art (Flexas et al. PLoS ONE 8:e80154, 2013). Little is known about how emotion influences aesthetic perception of non-abstract, representational stimuli, especially those that are particularly relevant for social behaviour, like human bodies. Here, we explore whether the subliminal presentation of emotionally charged visual primes modulates the explicit subjective aesthetic judgment of body images. Using a forward/backward masking procedure, we presented subliminally positive and negative, arousal-matched, emotional or neutral primes and measured their effect on the explicit evaluation of perceived beauty (high vs low) and emotion (positive vs negative) evoked by abstract and body images. We found that negative primes increased subjective aesthetic evaluations of target bodies or abstract images in comparison with positive primes. No influence of primes on the emotional dimension of the targets was found, thus ruling out an unspecific arousal effect and strengthening the link between emotional valence and aesthetic appreciation. More specifically, that subliminal negative primes increase beauty ratings compared to subliminal positive primes indicates a clear link between negative emotions and positive aesthetic evaluations and vice versa, suggesting a possible link between negative emotion and the experience of sublime in art. The study expands previous research by showing the effect of subliminal negative emotions on the subjective aesthetic evaluation not only of abstract but also of body images.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy. vanessa.era@uniroma1.it.|IRCCS, Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome, Italy. vanessa.era@uniroma1.it.
authors.forename: Vanessa
authors.identifier: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5288-1378
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Era
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy. matteo.candidi@uniroma1.it.|IRCCS, Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome, Italy. matteo.candidi@uniroma1.it.
authors.forename: Matteo
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Candidi
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.|IRCCS, Fondazione Santa Lucia, Rome, Italy.
authors.forename: Salvatore Maria
authors.initials: SM
authors.lastname: Aglioti
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001504:Beauty; D004644:Emotions / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment / Q000502:physiology*; D008297:Male; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D013360:Subliminal Stimulation; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology; D055815:Young Adult
keywords: Aesthetics; Affective misattribution; Body perception; Emotions