title: Rod- and cone-isolated flicker electroretinograms and their response summation characteristics.
abstract: This study defined the amplitude and phase characteristics of rod- and cone-isolated flicker electroretinograms (ERGs) and determined how these responses summate to generate the nonreceptor-specific ERG. Full-field ERGs were obtained from six normally sighted subjects (age 26 to 44 years) using a four-primary LED-based photostimulator and standard recording techniques. The four primaries were either modulated sinusoidally in phase to achieve simultaneous rod and cone activation (ERGR+C; nonreceptor-specific) or in different phases to achieve rod-isolated (ERGR) and cone-isolated (ERGC) responses by means of triple silent substitution. ERGs were measured at two mean luminance levels (2.4 and 24 cd/m2), two contrasts (20 and 40%), and four temporal frequencies (2-15 Hz). Fundamental amplitude and phase for each condition were derived by Fourier analysis. Response amplitude and phase depended on the stimulus conditions (frequency, mean luminance, and contrast), however, for all conditions: 1) response phase decreased monotonically as stimulus frequency increased; 2) response amplitude tended to decrease monotonically as stimulus frequency increased, with the exception of the 24 cd/m2, 40% contrast ERGR+C that was sharply V-shaped; 3) ERGR phase was delayed (32 to 210 deg) relative to the ERGC phase; 4) ERGR amplitude was typically equal to or lower than the ERGC amplitude, with the exception of the 2.4 cd/m2, 40% contrast condition; and 5) the pattern of ERGR+C responses could be accounted for by a vector summation model of the rod and cone pathway signals. The results show that the ERGR+C amplitude and phase can be predicted from ERGR and ERGC amplitude and phase. For conditions that elicit ERGR and ERGC responses that have approximately equal amplitude and opposite phase, there is strong destructive interference between the rod and cone responses that attenuates the ERGR+C. Conditions that elicit equal amplitude and opposite phase rod and cone responses may be particularly useful for evaluating rod-cone interactions.
authors.affiliation: Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences,University of Illinois at Chicago,Chicago,Illinois 60612.
authors.forename: J Jason
authors.initials: JJ
authors.lastname: McAnany
authors.affiliation: Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences,University of Illinois at Chicago,Chicago,Illinois 60612.
authors.forename: Jason C
authors.initials: JC
authors.lastname: Park
authors.affiliation: Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences,University of Illinois at Chicago,Chicago,Illinois 60612.
authors.forename: Dingcai
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Cao
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D015350:Contrast Sensitivity / Q000502:physiology*; D004596:Electroretinography; D005260:Female; D005425:Flicker Fusion / Q000502:physiology; D005583:Fourier Analysis; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D017949:Retinal Cone Photoreceptor Cells / Q000502:physiology*; D017948:Retinal Rod Photoreceptor Cells / Q000502:physiology*; D014785:Vision, Ocular / Q000502:physiology*
keywords: Cone; Electroretinogram (ERG); Flicker; Rod