title: Chloe's Law: A Powerful Legislative Movement Challenging a Core Ethical Norm of Genetic Testing.
abstract: Since the early 1970s, the ethical norm governing counselors involved in testing and screening for genetic conditions related to reproduction has been strict neutrality. Counseling about reproductive genetics was to be patient centered but nondirective. Many advocates for people with Down syndrome believe that high abortion rates following a diagnosis of this condition show an unfounded bias against those with Down syndrome. These advocates have succeeded in enacting federal and state legislation that requires women who receive a prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome to receive positive information about the condition, thereby ending the nominal goal of value-neutral counseling and setting the stage for further normative shifts in clinical reproductive genetics as counseling expands because of cell-free testing.
authors.affiliation: Director, Division of Medical Ethics, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York, United States of America.
authors.forename: Arthur L
authors.initials: AL
authors.lastname: Caplan
mesh_terms: D000025:Abortion, Eugenic / Q000941:ethics*; D004314:Down Syndrome / Q000175:diagnosis*; D005260:Female; D005817:Genetic Counseling / Q000941:ethics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D005820:Genetic Testing / Q000941:ethics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D006801:Humans; D010414:Pennsylvania; D011247:Pregnancy; D011296:Prenatal Diagnosis / Q000941:ethics*