title: Functional Roles of Neural Preparatory Processes in a Cued Stroop Task Revealed by Linking Electrophysiology with Behavioral Performance.
abstract: It is well established that cuing facilitates behavioral performance and that different aspects of instructional cues evoke specific neural preparatory processes in cued task-switching paradigms. To deduce the functional role of these neural preparatory processes the majority of studies vary aspects of the experimental paradigm and describe how these variations alter markers of neural preparatory processes. Although these studies provide important insights, they also have notable limitations, particularly in terms of understanding the causal or functional relationship of neural markers to cognitive and behavioral processes. In this study, we sought to address these limitations and uncover the functional roles of neural processes by examining how variability in the amplitude of neural preparatory processes predicts behavioral performance to subsequent stimuli. To achieve this objective 16 young adults were recruited to perform a cued Stroop task while their brain activity was measured using high-density electroencephalography. Four temporally overlapping but functionally and topographically distinct cue-triggered event related potentials (ERPs) were identified: 1) A left-frontotemporal negativity (250-700 ms) that was positively associated with word-reading performance; 2) a midline-frontal negativity (450-800 ms) that was positively associated with color-naming and incongruent performance; 3) a left-frontal negativity (450-800 ms) that was positively associated with switch trial performance; and 4) a centroparietal positivity (450-800 ms) that was positively associated with performance for almost all trial types. These results suggest that at least four dissociable cognitive processes are evoked by instructional cues in the present task, including: 1) domain-specific task facilitation; 2) switch-specific task-set reconfiguration; 3) preparation for response conflict; and 4) proactive attentional control. Examining the relationship between ERPs and behavioral performance provides a functional link between neural markers and the cognitive processes they index.
authors.affiliation: J Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.
authors.forename: Chao
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Wang
authors.affiliation: J Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.
authors.forename: Mingzhou
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Ding
authors.affiliation: Department of Neurology, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, Colorado, United States of America.
authors.forename: Benzi M
authors.initials: BM
authors.lastname: Kluger
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001519:Behavior; D001921:Brain / Q000502:physiology; D004569:Electroencephalography; D005071:Evoked Potentials; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D013647:Task Performance and Analysis; D055815:Young Adult