title: What can the past of pay-for-performance tell us about the future of Value-Based Purchasing in Medicare?
abstract: The Medicare program has implemented pay-for-performance (P4P), or Value-Based Purchasing, for inpatient care and for Medicare Advantage plans, and plans to implement a program for physicians in 2015. In this paper, we review evidence on the effectiveness of P4P and identify design criteria deemed to be best practice in P4P. We then assess the extent to which Medicare's existing and planned Value-Based Purchasing programs align with these best practices. Of the seven identified best practices in P4P program design, the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing program is strongly aligned with two of the best practices, moderately aligned with three, weakly aligned with one, and has unclear alignment with one best practice. The Physician Value-Based Purchasing Modifier is strongly aligned with two of the best practices, moderately aligned with one, weakly aligned with three, and has unclear alignment with one of the best practices. The Medicare Advantage Quality Bonus Program is strongly aligned with four of the best practices, moderately aligned with two, and weakly aligned with one of the best practices. We identify enduring gaps in P4P literature as it relates to Medicare's plans for Value-Based Purchasing and discuss important issues in the future of these implementations in Medicare.
authors.affiliation: Department of Public Health, Weill Cornell Medical College, 402 East 67th Street, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: amr2015@med.cornell.edu.
authors.forename: Andrew M
authors.initials: AM
authors.lastname: Ryan
authors.affiliation: RAND Corporation and Pardee RAND Graduate School, Santa Monica, CA, USA.
authors.forename: Cheryl L
authors.initials: CL
authors.lastname: Damberg
keywords: Medicare; Pay-for-performance; Payment; Value-based-purchasing