title: Comments on Lone et al.: One-year prospective comparison of vaginal pessaries and surgery for pelvic organ prolapse using the validated ICIQ-VS and ICIQ-UI (SF) questionnaires.
authors.affiliation: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Medical Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands, M.K.vandeWaarsenburg@umcutrecht.nl.
authors.forename: Kim
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: van de Waarsenburg
authors.forename: Astrid
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Vollebregt
authors.forename: Fred
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Milani
authors.forename: Katrien
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Oude Rengerink
authors.forename: Huub
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: van der Vaart
mesh_terms: D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care; D056887:Pelvic Organ Prolapse / Q000601:surgery*; D010570:Pessaries / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*