An international systematic mapping review of fieldwork education in occupational therapy.
BACKGROUND
Owing to its importance in preparing occupational therapists, fieldwork education has generated numerous studies. These have not been collected and reviewed, leaving researchers without a map for growing a science of fieldwork education.


OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to systematically categorize the topics, research designs, methods, levels of impact, and themes that have and have not been addressed in fieldwork education scholarship.


METHODS
Guided by a systematic mapping review design, 124 articles, identified through database searches and inclusion coding, were studied. Data were collected using a data extraction instrument and analyzed using Microsoft Access queries.


RESULTS
Papers primarily addressed curriculum (n = 51) and students (n = 32). Conceptual/descriptive inquiry methods (n = 57) were predominant. Qualitative (n = 48) and quantitative methods (n = 49) were used equally. Research outcomes mainly targeted perceived participation in fieldwork. Recurring themes included student perceptions, external influences, and transition to practice.


CONCLUSIONS
Three recommendations were identified: strengthen procedures for studying singular fieldwork experiences, broaden rationales for studying fieldwork, and translate educational concepts for occupational therapy.
Michael E
ME
Roberts
Barbara R
BR
Hooper
Wendy H
WH
Wood
Robin M
RM
King
D003479:Curriculum; D004517:Education, Professional / Q000458:organization & administration*; D006801:Humans; D017145:Models, Educational; D009788:Occupational Therapy / Q000193:education*; D011231:Preceptorship / Q000458:organization & administration*; D012107:Research Design