The analytic setting today: using the couch or the chair?
This paper re-visits Murray Jackson's 1961 paper in the Journal of Analytical Psychology, 'Chair, couch and countertransference', with the aim of exploring the role of the couch for Jungian analysts in clinical practice today. Within the Society of Analytical Psychology (SAP) and some other London-based societies, there has been an evolution of practice from face-to-face sessions with the patient in the chair, as was Jung's preference, to a mode of practice where patients use the couch with the analyst sitting to the side rather than behind, as has been the tradition in psychoanalysis. Fordham was the founding member of the SAP and it was because of his liaison with psychoanalysis and psychoanalysts that this cultural shift came about. Using clinical examples, the author explores the couch/chair question in terms of her own practice and the internal setting as a structure in her mind. With reference to Bleger's (2013) paper 'Psychoanalysis of the psychoanalytic setting', the author discusses how the analytic setting, including use of the couch or the chair, can act as a silent container for the most primitive aspects of the patient's psyche which will only emerge in analysis when the setting changes or is breached.
London, UK.
Jan
J
Wiener
D006801:Humans; D011369:Professional-Patient Relations; D011575:Psychoanalytic Therapy / Q000379:methods*
Contre-transfert; Couch; Gegenübertragung; Jungian practice; Sessel; chair; contratransferencia; controtranfert; countertransference; divan; diván; fauteuil; hidden power of the analytic setting; jungianische Praxis; lettino; poder escondido del dispositivo analítico; poltrona; potere nascosto del setting analitico; pouvoir caché du cadre analytique; pratica Junghiana; pratique jungienne; práctica Junguiana; silla; verborgene Macht des analytischen Settings; контрперенос; кресло; кушетка; скрытая сила аналитического сеттинга; юнгианская практика