Incorporating measurement error in n = 1 psychological autoregressive modeling.
Measurement error is omnipresent in psychological data. However, the vast majority of applications of autoregressive time series analyses in psychology do not take measurement error into account. Disregarding measurement error when it is present in the data results in a bias of the autoregressive parameters. We discuss two models that take measurement error into account: An autoregressive model with a white noise term (AR+WN), and an autoregressive moving average (ARMA) model. In a simulation study we compare the parameter recovery performance of these models, and compare this performance for both a Bayesian and frequentist approach. We find that overall, the AR+WN model performs better. Furthermore, we find that for realistic (i.e., small) sample sizes, psychological research would benefit from a Bayesian approach in fitting these models. Finally, we illustrate the effect of disregarding measurement error in an AR(1) model by means of an empirical application on mood data in women. We find that, depending on the person, approximately 30-50% of the total variance was due to measurement error, and that disregarding this measurement error results in a substantial underestimation of the autoregressive parameters.
Department of Methodology and Statistics, Utrecht University Utrecht, Netherlands.
Noémi K
NK
Schuurman
Academic Centre of Psychiatry, Groningen University Groningen, Netherlands.
Jan H
JH
Houtveen
Department of Methodology and Statistics, Utrecht University Utrecht, Netherlands.
Ellen L
EL
Hamaker
Bayesian modeling; autoregressive modeling; idiographic; measurement error; n = 1; time series analysis