Cytotype distribution patterns, ecological differentiation, and genetic structure in a diploid-tetraploid contact zone of Cardamine amara.
•


OBJECTIVE
Contact zones between diploids and their autopolyploid descendants represent a unique evolutionary venue for studying polyploid establishment, cytotype coexistence, and interactions. Here, we examine cytotype coexistence in a diploid-tetraploid contact zone of a perennial herb, Cardamine amara, located north of the Alps by assessing cytotype spatial patterns, ecological divergence, and genetic variation and structure.•


METHODS
Flow cytometry was applied to screen DNA ploidy levels in 302 populations (3296 individuals) and the genetic variation of a selection of 25 populations was examined using microsatellite and AFLP markers. Environmental (landscape and climatic) data were analyzed to assess ecological differentiation between the cytotypes.•


RESULTS
A parapatric distribution of the cytotypes with a relatively wide (over 100 km in some regions) secondary contact zone was identified. Mixed-ploidy populations, documented for the first time in this species, as well as triploid individuals were found along the diploid-tetraploid borderline. Different climatic requirements of the two main cytotypes were revealed, mirrored in their altitudinal separation. The tetraploids were genetically differentiated from both the diploids and the modeled, in silico autotetraploid genotypes, in accordance with the assumed polyploid origin and spread linked to past glaciations, and largely independent evolution in allopatry.•


CONCLUSIONS
The observed spatial and genetic patterns likely reflect the evolutionary and colonization history of the two cytotypes and have been maintained by multiple factors such as ecological divergence, limited gene flow between the cytotypes, and the restricted dispersal capacity.
Institute of Botany, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, SK-845 23 Bratislava, Slovak Republic.
Judita
J
Zozomová-Lihová
Koperníkova 6, CZ-301 00 Plzeň, Czech Republic.
Iva
I
Malánová-Krásná
Department of Botany, Faculty of Sciences, Charles University, Benátská 2, CZ-128 01 Praha, Czech Republic Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, CZ-252 43 Průhonice, Czech Republic.
Petr
P
Vít
Department of Botany, Faculty of Sciences, Charles University, Benátská 2, CZ-128 01 Praha, Czech Republic Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, CZ-252 43 Průhonice, Czech Republic.
Tomáš
T
Urfus
Institute of Botany, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, SK-845 23 Bratislava, Slovak Republic.
Dušan
D
Senko
Faculty of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Technical University in Zvolen, T. G. Masaryka 24, SK-960 53 Zvolen, Slovak Republic Eawag Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Department of Aquatic Ecology, Centre of Ecology, Evolution and Biogeochemistry, Seestrasse 79, CH-6047 Kastanienbaum, Switzerland.
Marek
M
Svitok
Institute of Botany, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, SK-845 23 Bratislava, Slovak Republic.
Matúš
M
Kempa
Institute of Botany, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dúbravská cesta 9, SK-845 23 Bratislava, Slovak Republic Department of Botany, Faculty of Sciences, Charles University, Benátská 2, CZ-128 01 Praha, Czech Republic.
Karol
K
Marhold
D054458:Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism Analysis; D031217:Cardamine / Q000235:genetics / Q000502:physiology*; D032461:Chromosomes, Plant / Q000235:genetics*; D004171:Diploidy; D017753:Ecosystem; D005060:Europe; D014644:Genetic Variation; D006824:Hybridization, Genetic; D018895:Microsatellite Repeats; D063148:Plant Dispersal; D057891:Tetraploidy
AFLPs; Alps; Brassicaceae; autopolyploidy; contact zone; cytotype coexistence; environmental predictors; microsatellites; polyploidy