What is being measured, and by whom? Facilitation of communication on technical measures amongst competent authorities in the implementation of the European Union Broiler Directive (2007/43/EC).
The European Union (EU) Broiler Directive (2007/43/EC) is unique amongst current EU Directives, which address animal welfare, in that it uses outcome data collected at abattoirs and on farm to monitor on-farm broiler welfare and vary the maximum permitted stocking density on farm. In this study, we describe how, by bringing together personnel from the competent authorities in 22 member states (MSs) who have responsibility for implementing the Directive, and engaging in exchange of information and technical methods regarding the Broiler Directive, it has been possible to identify differences in approach with regard to 'what data is being collected, and by whom' across EU MSs. Online questionnaires and workshop exercises enabled us to identify priority areas for knowledge transfer and training. For example, foot pad dermatitis, hock burn, dead on arrival and total rejections (birds rejected as unfit for human consumption by the meat inspection staff at slaughter) were identified by the MSs as measures of medium-to-low priority in terms of knowledge transfer because there are assessment methods for these conditions that are already well accepted by competent authorities. On the other hand, breast lesions, cellulitis, emaciation, joint lesions, respiratory problems, scratches, wing fractures and a number of environmental measures were identified as having high priority in terms of knowledge transfer. The study identified that there is significant variability in the stage of implementation between MSs, and responses from the participating MSs indicated that sharing of guidance and technical information between MSs may be of value in the future set-up process for those MSs engaged in implementation of the Directive.
1Animal Behaviour and Welfare Group,Clinical Veterinary Science,University of Bristol,Langford,North Somerset,BS40 5DU,UK.
A
A
Butterworth
2Centre for Animal Welfare and Adaptation,Wageningen UR Livestock Research,PO Box 65,8200 AB Lelystad,The Netherlands.
I C
IC
de Jong
3Fachgebiet Nutztierethologie und Tierhaltung,Universität Kassel,Nordbahnhofstrasse 1a,34109 Kassel,Germany.
C
C
Keppler
3Fachgebiet Nutztierethologie und Tierhaltung,Universität Kassel,Nordbahnhofstrasse 1a,34109 Kassel,Germany.
U
U
Knierim
4Farm Animal Welfare & Behaviour Group,Institute for Agricultural and Fisheries Research (ILVO),Burgemeester Van Gansberghelaan 96,Box 1,9820 Merelbeke,Belgium.
L
L
Stadig
1Animal Behaviour and Welfare Group,Clinical Veterinary Science,University of Bristol,Langford,North Somerset,BS40 5DU,UK.
S
S
Lambton
D000003:Abattoirs / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000592:standards*; D000822:Animal Husbandry / Q000193:education / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards*; D000827:Animal Welfare / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000592:standards; D000818:Animals; D002645:Chickens / Q000293:injuries; D005062:European Union / Q000458:organization & administration; D005513:Food Inspection / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000592:standards; D006801:Humans; D011201:Poultry Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis; D011202:Poultry Products / Q000592:standards
assessment; broiler chicken; directive; legislation; outcomes