Narrative review of models and success factors for scaling up public health interventions.
BACKGROUND
To maximise the impact of public health research, research interventions found to be effective in improving health need to be scaled up and delivered on a population-wide basis. Theoretical frameworks and approaches are useful for describing and understanding how effective interventions are scaled up from small trials into broader policy and practice and can be used as a tool to facilitate effective scale-up. The purpose of this literature review was to synthesise evidence on scaling up public health interventions into population-wide policy and practice, with a focus on the defining and describing frameworks, processes and methods of scaling up public health initiatives.


METHODS
The review involved keyword searches of electronic databases including MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EBM Reviews and Google Scholar between August and December 2013. Keywords included 'scaling up' and 'scalability', while the search terms 'intervention research', 'translational research', 'research dissemination', 'health promotion' and 'public health' were used to focus the search on public health approaches. Studies included in the review were published in English from January 1990 to December 2013 and described processes, theories or frameworks associated with scaling up public health and health promotion interventions.


RESULTS
There is a growing body of literature describing frameworks for scaling health interventions, with the review identifying eight frameworks, the majority of which have an explicit focus on scaling up health action in low and middle income country contexts. Key success factors for scaling up included the importance of establishing monitoring and evaluation systems, costing and economic modelling of intervention approaches, active engagement of a range of implementers and the target community, tailoring the scaled-up approach to the local context, the use of participatory approaches, the systematic use of evidence, infrastructure to support implementation, strong leadership and champions, political will, well defined scale-up strategy and strong advocacy.


CONCLUSIONS
Effective scaling up requires the systematic use of evidence, and it is essential that data from implementation monitoring is linked to decision making throughout the scaling up process. Conceptual frameworks can assist both policy makers and researchers to determine the type of research that is most useful at different stages of scaling up processes.
School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. andrew.milat@doh.health.nsw.gov.au.|Centre for Epidemiology and Evidence, New South Wales Ministry of Health, 73 Miller St North Sydney, North Sydney, NSW, 2060, Australia. andrew.milat@doh.health.nsw.gov.au.
Andrew J
AJ
Milat
School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. adrian.bauman@sydney.edu.au.
Adrian
A
Bauman
Sax Institute, Sydney, Australia. Sally.Redman@saxinstitute.org.au.
Sally
S
Redman
D057191:Capacity Building / Q000379:methods* / Q000458:organization & administration; D006801:Humans; D017146:Models, Organizational; D016730:Program Development; D015397:Program Evaluation; D011635:Public Health Administration / Q000379:methods*