Effects of konjac flour inclusion in gestation diets on the nutrient digestibility, lactation feed intake and reproductive performance of sows.
This study was conducted to investigate the effects of konjac flour (KF) inclusion in gestation diets of sows on nutrients digestibility, lactation feed intake, reproductive performance of sows and preweaning performance of piglets. Two isoenergetic and isonitrogenous gestation diets were formulated: a control diet and a 2.1% KF-supplemented diet (KF diet). Both diets had the same NDF and insoluble fiber (ISF) levels, but the KF diet had higher soluble fiber (SF) level. The day after breeding, 96 multiparous sows were assigned to the two dietary treatments. Restrict-fed during gestation, in contrast, all sows were offered the same lactation diet ad libitum. Response criteria included sow BW, backfat depth, lactation feed intake, weaning-to-estrus interval, litter size and piglet's weight at parturition and day 21 of lactation. On day 60 of gestation, 20 sows were used to measure nutrient digestibility. Results showed that the digestibility of dry matter, gross energy, crude fiber and ADF were not affected by the dietary treatments. The inclusion of KF in gestation diets increased NDF digestibility (P<0.05) and tended to increase the digestibility of CP (P=0.05) compared with the control diet group. In addition, dietary treatment during gestation did not affect litter size, BW and backfat gain during gestation, lactation weight, backfat loss or weaning-to-estrus interval of sows. However, sows fed the KF diet consumed more (P<0.05) lactation diet per day than sows in the control group. Accordingly, sows fed the KF diet showed greater average piglet weights on day 21 of lactation (P=0.09), and the litter weight of sows fed the KF diet on day 21 of lactation increased by 3.95 kg compared with sows fed the control diet (not significant). In conclusion, the inclusion of KF in gestation diets increased lactation feed intake of sows and tended to improve litter performance.
1Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science,College of Animal Science and Technology,Huazhong Agricultural University,Wuhan 430070,P. R. China.
H Q
HQ
Sun
1Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science,College of Animal Science and Technology,Huazhong Agricultural University,Wuhan 430070,P. R. China.
Y F
YF
Zhou
1Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science,College of Animal Science and Technology,Huazhong Agricultural University,Wuhan 430070,P. R. China.
C Q
CQ
Tan
1Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science,College of Animal Science and Technology,Huazhong Agricultural University,Wuhan 430070,P. R. China.
L F
LF
Zheng
1Department of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science,College of Animal Science and Technology,Huazhong Agricultural University,Wuhan 430070,P. R. China.
J
J
Peng
2Key Laboratory of Swine Breeding and Genetics of the Agricultural Ministry,College of Animal Science and Technology,Huazhong Agricultural University,Wuhan 430070,P.R. China.
S W
SW
Jiang
D031056:Amorphophallus / Q000737:chemistry*; D000821:Animal Feed / Q000032:analysis*; D000824:Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena; D000818:Animals; D001835:Body Weight / Q000187:drug effects; D004032:Diet / Q000662:veterinary*; D004043:Dietary Fiber / Q000494:pharmacology; D019587:Dietary Supplements; D004971:Estrus; D005260:Female; D007774:Lactation / Q000502:physiology*; D008098:Litter Size; D039382:Maternal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena; D010298:Parity; D011247:Pregnancy; D012098:Reproduction / Q000187:drug effects; D013552:Swine / Q000502:physiology*; D014886:Weaning