Publication of statistically significant research findings in prosthodontics & implant dentistry in the context of other dental specialties.
OBJECTIVE
To assess the hypothesis that there is excessive reporting of statistically significant studies published in prosthodontic and implantology journals, which could indicate selective publication.


METHODS
The last 30 issues of 9 journals in prosthodontics and implant dentistry were hand-searched for articles with statistical analyses. The percentages of significant and non-significant results were tabulated by parameter of interest. Univariable/multivariable logistic regression analyses were applied to identify possible predictors of reporting statistically significance findings. The results of this study were compared with similar studies in dentistry with random-effects meta-analyses.


RESULTS
From the 2323 included studies 71% of them reported statistically significant results, with the significant results ranging from 47% to 86%. Multivariable modeling identified that geographical area and involvement of statistician were predictors of statistically significant results. Compared to interventional studies, the odds that in vitro and observational studies would report statistically significant results was increased by 1.20 times (OR: 2.20, 95% CI: 1.66-2.92) and 0.35 times (OR: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.05-1.73), respectively. The probability of statistically significant results from randomized controlled trials was significantly lower compared to various study designs (difference: 30%, 95% CI: 11-49%). Likewise the probability of statistically significant results in prosthodontics and implant dentistry was lower compared to other dental specialties, but this result did not reach statistical significant (P>0.05).


CONCLUSIONS
The majority of studies identified in the fields of prosthodontics and implant dentistry presented statistically significant results. The same trend existed in publications of other specialties in dentistry.
Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, University of Bonn, Bonn 53111, Germany; Department of Oral Technology, School of Dentistry, University of Bonn, Bonn 53111, Germany.
Spyridon N
SN
Papageorgiou
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, School of Dental Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Bern, Bern 3010, Switzerland.
Dimitrios
D
Kloukos
Prosthodontic Unit, Department of Restorative Dentistry, UCL Eastman Dental Institute, London WC1X8LD, UK.
Haralampos
H
Petridis
Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, School of Dental Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Bern, Bern 3010, Switzerland; Private Practice, Corfu 49100, Greece. Electronic address: npandis@yahoo.com.
Nikolaos
N
Pandis
D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D003757:Dental Implantation / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D018865:Dental Research; D006801:Humans; D055811:Journal Impact Factor; D011476:Prosthodontics; D011642:Publications / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011643:Publishing / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D013039:Specialties, Dental
Dental implant; Dentistry; Prosthodontics; Publication bias; Reporting bias; Statistical significance