Assessment of Protective Gloves for Use with Airfed Suits.
Gloves are often needed for hand protection at work, but they can impair manual dexterity, especially if they are multilayered or ill-fitting. This article describes two studies of gloves to be worn with airfed suits (AFS) for nuclear decommissioning or containment level 4 (CL4) microbiological work. Both sets of workers wear multiple layers of gloves for protection and to accommodate decontamination procedures. Nuclear workers are also often required to wear cut-resistant gloves as an extra layer of protection. A total of 15 subjects volunteered to take part in manual dexterity testing of the different gloving systems. The subjects' hands were measured to ensure that the appropriate sized gloves were used. The gloves were tested with the subjects wearing the complete clothing ensembles appropriate to the work, using a combination of standard dexterity tests: the nine-hole peg test; a pin test adapted from the European Standard for protective gloves, the Purdue Pegboard test, and the Minnesota turning test. Specialized tests such as a hand tool test were used to test nuclear gloves, and laboratory-type manipulation tasks were used to test CL4 gloves. Subjective assessments of temperature sensation and skin wettedness were made before and after the dexterity tests of the nuclear gloves only. During all assessments, we made observations and questioned the subjects about ergonomic issues related to the clothing ensembles. Overall, the results show that the greater the thickness of the gloves and the number of layers the more the levels of manual dexterity performance are degraded. The nuclear cut-resistant gloves with the worst level of dexterity were stiff and inflexible and the subjects experienced problems picking up small items and bending their hands. The work also highlighted other factors that affect manual dexterity performance, including proper sizing, interactions with the other garments worn at the time, and the work equipment in use. In conclusion, when evaluating gloves for use in the workplace it is important to use tests that reflect the working environment and always to consider the balance between protection and usability.
Engineering and Personal Safety Unit, Health and Safety Laboratory, Harpur Hill, Buxton Derbyshire SK17 9JN, UK.
Claire E
CE
Millard
Engineering and Personal Safety Unit, Health and Safety Laboratory, Harpur Hill, Buxton Derbyshire SK17 9JN, UK. nick.vaughan@hsl.gsi.gov.uk.
Nicholas P
NP
Vaughan
D003264:Containment of Biohazards; D003666:Decontamination / Q000295:instrumentation; D005260:Female; D017575:Gloves, Protective / Q000592:standards*; D006225:Hand; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009048:Motor Skills; D055848:Nuclear Power Plants; D016273:Occupational Exposure / Q000032:analysis / Q000517:prevention & control; D017132:Workplace
containment; cut-resistant gloves; decommissioning; decontamination; dexterity; interaction; protective gloves; workplace