Developing Brain Injury Interventions on Both Ends of the Treatment Continuum Depends Upon Early Research Partnerships and Feasibility Studies.
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this research article is to describe two very different lines of brain injury treatment research, both of which illuminate the benefits of implementation science.


METHODS
The article first describes the development and pilot of a computerized cognitive intervention and highlights how adherence to implementation science principles improved the design of the intervention. Second, the article describes the application of implementation science to the development of assistive technology for cognition.


RESULTS
The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR; Damschroder et al., 2009) and the menu of implementation research strategies by Powell et al. (2012) provide a roadmap for cognitive rehabilitation researchers to attend to factors in the implementation climate that can improve the development, usability, and adoptability of new treatment methods.


CONCLUSIONS
Attention to implementation science research principles has increased the feasibility and efficacy of both impairment-based cognitive rehabilitation programs and assistive technology for cognition.
McKay Moore
MM
Sohlberg
Priya
P
Kucheria
Stephen
S
Fickas
Shari L
SL
Wade
D035843:Biomedical Research / Q000379:methods*; D001930:Brain Injuries / Q000523:psychology / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D015928:Cognitive Behavioral Therapy / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D003201:Computers; D005240:Feasibility Studies; D006284:Health Plan Implementation / Q000379:methods; D006801:Humans; D009042:Motivation; D010342:Patient Acceptance of Health Care; D010865:Pilot Projects; D012107:Research Design; D013813:Therapy, Computer-Assisted / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*