Internal versus external fixation of the anterior component in unstable fractures of the pelvic ring: pooled results from a systematic review.
OBJECTIVE
Improving reduction of the pelvic ring improves long-term functional outcomes for patients. It has been demonstrated that posterior internal fixation is necessary to adequately control fractures to the posterior ring and there is evidence that supplementing this with fixation of the anterior ring improves stability. It is accepted that internal fixation provides greater stability than external fixation of the anterior ring but long-term differences in radiographic and functional outcomes have not yet been quantified.


METHODS
A search of electronic databases, reference lists and review articles from 1989 to 2015 yielded 18 studies (n = 884) that met our inclusion criteria. We included studies that discussed pelvic ring injuries in adults, reported functional or radiological outcomes or complications by anterior ring intervention and exceeded 14 patients. We excluded biomechanical and cadaver studies.


RESULTS
Internal fixation of the anterior pelvic ring had better functional and radiographic outcomes. Residual displacement of >10 mm was less common with internal fixation (ER 0.12, 95 % CI 0.06-0.24) than external fixation (ER 0.31, 95 % CI 0.11-0.62). Unsatisfactory outcomes also occurred at a lower rate (ER 0.09, 95 % CI 0.03-0.22) compared to external fixation (ER 0.32, 95 % CI 0.18-0.50). Losses of reduction (ER 0.02, 95 % CI 0.01-0.04 versus ER 0.07, 95 % CI 0.02-0.21), malunions (ER 0.03, 95 % CI 0.01-0.08 versus ER 0.07, 95 % CI 0.02-0.21) and delayed/non-unions (ER 0.02, 95 % CI 0.01-0.05 versus ER 0.04, 95 % CI 0.02-0.07).


CONCLUSIONS
Internal fixation of the anterior pelvic ring as supplementary fixation for unstable injuries to the pelvic ring appears to result in better radiographic and functional outcomes as well as fewer complications. However, data that separated outcomes and complications in relation to interventions of the anterior pelvic ring were limited. More studies looking specifically at outcomes in relation to the type of anterior ring intervention are needed.
Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
B
B
Wardle
Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia. eslickg@med.usyd.edu.au.|Department of Surgery, The Whiteley-Martin Research Centre, Nepean Hospital, Penrith, NSW, 2750, Australia. eslickg@med.usyd.edu.au.
G D
GD
Eslick
Department of Orthopaedics, Nepean Hospital, Penrith, NSW, 2750, Australia.
P
P
Sunner
D005592:Fracture Fixation / Q000379:methods*; D050723:Fractures, Bone / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery*; D006801:Humans; D010384:Pelvic Bones / Q000293:injuries*; D016059:Range of Motion, Articular; D016896:Treatment Outcome
External fixation; Fracture; Internal fixation; Pelvic Bones; Pelvic ring