DNA Extraction Method Affects the Detection of a Fungal Pathogen in Formalin-Fixed Specimens Using qPCR.
Museum collections provide indispensable repositories for obtaining information about the historical presence of disease in wildlife populations. The pathogenic amphibian chytrid fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd) has played a significant role in global amphibian declines, and examining preserved specimens for Bd can improve our understanding of its emergence and spread. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) enables Bd detection with minimal disturbance to amphibian skin and is significantly more sensitive to detecting Bd than histology; therefore, developing effective qPCR methodologies for detecting Bd DNA in formalin-fixed specimens can provide an efficient and effective approach to examining historical Bd emergence and prevalence. Techniques for detecting Bd in museum specimens have not been evaluated for their effectiveness in control specimens that mimic the conditions of animals most likely to be encountered in museums, including those with low pathogen loads. We used American bullfrogs (Lithobates catesbeianus) of known infection status to evaluate the success of qPCR to detect Bd in formalin-fixed specimens after three years of ethanol storage. Our objectives were to compare the most commonly used DNA extraction method for Bd (PrepMan, PM) to Macherey-Nagel DNA FFPE (MN), test optimizations for Bd detection with PM, and provide recommendations for maximizing Bd detection. We found that successful detection is relatively high (80-90%) when Bd loads before formalin fixation are high, regardless of the extraction method used; however, at lower infection levels, detection probabilities were significantly reduced. The MN DNA extraction method increased Bd detection by as much as 50% at moderate infection levels. Our results indicate that, for animals characterized by lower pathogen loads (i.e., those most commonly encountered in museum collections), current methods may underestimate the proportion of Bd-infected amphibians. Those extracting DNA from archived museum specimens should ensure that the techniques they are using are known to provide high-quality throughput DNA for later analysis.
Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.
Andrea J
AJ
Adams
Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.
John P
JP
LaBonte
Wildlands Conservation Science, Lompoc, California, United States of America.
Morgan L
ML
Ball
School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Kathryn L
KL
Richards-Hrdlicka
Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.
Mary H
MH
Toothman
Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, California, United States of America.
Cheryl J
CJ
Briggs
D000663:Amphibians / Q000382:microbiology; D000818:Animals; D000835:Animals, Wild / Q000382:microbiology; D008411:Chytridiomycota / Q000235:genetics*; D004271:DNA, Fungal / Q000737:chemistry* / Q000235:genetics*; D005557:Formaldehyde; D009144:Museums; D011892:Rana catesbeiana / Q000382:microbiology; D060888:Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction / Q000379:methods; D013048:Specimen Handling / Q000379:methods
D004271:DNA, Fungal; D005557:Formaldehyde