Geographic range did not confer resilience to extinction in terrestrial vertebrates at the end-Triassic crisis.
Rates of extinction vary greatly through geological time, with losses particularly concentrated in mass extinctions. Species duration at other times varies greatly, but the reasons for this are unclear. Geographical range correlates with lineage duration amongst marine invertebrates, but it is less clear how far this generality extends to other groups in other habitats. It is also unclear whether a wide geographical distribution makes groups more likely to survive mass extinctions. Here we test for extinction selectivity amongst terrestrial vertebrates across the end-Triassic event. We demonstrate that terrestrial vertebrate clades with larger geographical ranges were more resilient to extinction than those with smaller ranges throughout the Triassic and Jurassic. However, this relationship weakened with increasing proximity to the end-Triassic mass extinction, breaking down altogether across the event itself. We demonstrate that these findings are not a function of sampling biases; a perennial issue in studies of this kind.
1] Milner Centre for Evolution, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY, UK [2] School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK.
Alexander M
AM
Dunhill
Milner Centre for Evolution, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY, UK.
Matthew A
MA
Wills
D063147:Animal Distribution; D000818:Animals; D053476:Extinction, Biological; D005580:Fossils; D019015:Geologic Sediments; D049690:History, Ancient; D014714:Vertebrates / Q000145:classification* / Q000502:physiology*