The neurophysiology of language processing shapes the evolution of grammar: evidence from case marking.
Do principles of language processing in the brain affect the way grammar evolves over time or is language change just a matter of socio-historical contingency? While the balance of evidence has been ambiguous and controversial, we identify here a neurophysiological constraint on the processing of language that has a systematic effect on the evolution of how noun phrases are marked by case (i.e. by such contrasts as between the English base form she and the object form her). In neurophysiological experiments across diverse languages we found that during processing, participants initially interpret the first base-form noun phrase they hear (e.g. she…) as an agent (which would fit a continuation like … greeted him), even when the sentence later requires the interpretation of a patient role (as in … was greeted). We show that this processing principle is also operative in Hindi, a language where initial base-form noun phrases most commonly denote patients because many agents receive a special case marker ("ergative") and are often left out in discourse. This finding suggests that the principle is species-wide and independent of the structural affordances of specific languages. As such, the principle favors the development and maintenance of case-marking systems that equate base-form cases with agents rather than with patients. We confirm this evolutionary bias by statistical analyses of phylogenetic signals in over 600 languages worldwide, controlling for confounding effects from language contact. Our findings suggest that at least one core property of grammar systematically adapts in its evolution to the neurophysiological conditions of the brain, independently of socio-historical factors. This opens up new avenues for understanding how specific properties of grammar have developed in tight interaction with the biological evolution of our species.
Department of Comparative Linguistics, University of Zürich, 8032 Zürich, Switzerland.
Balthasar
B
Bickel
Department of General Linguistics, University of Kiel, 24098 Kiel, Germany.
Alena
A
Witzlack-Makarevich
Department of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Ropar, Rupnagar 140001, India.
Kamal K
KK
Choudhary
Department of English and Linguistics, University of Mainz, 55099 Mainz, Germany; School of Psychology, Social Work and Social Policy, University of South Australia, Adelaide, 5001 South Australia, Australia.
Matthias
M
Schlesewsky
School of Psychology, Social Work and Social Policy, University of South Australia, Adelaide, 5001 South Australia, Australia; Department of Germanic Linguistics, University of Marburg, 35032 Marburg, Germany.
Ina
I
Bornkessel-Schlesewsky
D000328:Adult; D005075:Biological Evolution; D001921:Brain / Q000502:physiology; D032882:Comprehension / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009482:Neurophysiology; D010700:Phonetics; D011578:Psycholinguistics; D012660:Semantics; D014825:Vocabulary