The Shared Decision Making Frontier: a Feasibility and Usability Study for Managing Non-Critical Chronic Illness by Combining Behavioural & Decision Theory with Online Technology.
The objective of this study is to determine if shared decisions for managing non-critical chronic illness, made through an online biomedical technology intervention, us feasible and usable. The technology intervention incorporates behavioural and decision theories to increase patient engagement, and ultimately long term adherence to health behaviour change. We devised the iheart web intervention as a "proof of concept" in five phases. The implementation incorporates the Vaadin web application framework, Drools, EclipseLink and a MySQL database. Two-thirds of the study participants favoured the technology intervention, based on Likert-scale questions from a post-study questionnaire. Qualitative analysis of think aloud feedback, video screen captures and open-ended questions from the post-study questionnaire uncovered six main areas or themes for improvement. We conclude that online shared decisions for managing a non-critical chronic illness are feasible and usable through the iheart web intervention.
Department of Computer Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Amina
A
Russell
Department of Computer Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
William
W
Van Woensel
Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Samina Raza
SR
Abidi
D002170:Canada; D002908:Chronic Disease / Q000628:therapy*; D000066491:Clinical Decision-Making / Q000379:methods*; D003657:Decision Making; D020000:Decision Support Systems, Clinical; D003661:Decision Support Techniques; D005240:Feasibility Studies; D061108:Social Media; D014600:Utilization Review