title: External Versus Endoscopic Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy.
abstract: DCR is the treatment of choice for NLDO. External DCR has remained the standard approach since the 1890s. With advances in technique and technology, and more otolaryngologists and ophthalmologists performing endoscopic DCR, more studies have been conducted, some with equivalent success rates between the 2 approaches. Endoscopic endonasal DCR offers the advantages of avoiding a skin incision with similar success rates with experienced surgeons. However, the technique necessitates more surgical equipment, and has a steep learning curve. Both approaches have low complication rates and serious complications are very rare. The decision for the type of approach to use depends on the surgeon’s experience, the patient’s preference or concerns, and the resources available within a particular health system.
authors: Seanna R
authors: SR
authors: Grob
authors: Ashley
authors: A
authors: Campbell
authors: Daniel R
authors: DR
authors: Lefebvre
authors: Michael K
authors: MK
authors: Yoon
mesh_terms: D003608:Dacryocystorhinostomy / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods*; D004724:Endoscopy / Q000379:methods; D006801:Humans; D007767:Lacrimal Duct Obstruction / Q000209:etiology; D009301:Nasolacrimal Duct / Q000601:surgery; D057605:Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods*; D010027:Osteotomy / Q000379:methods; D011183:Postoperative Complications