title: [Risk Assessment of Single-Donor (Apheresis) Platelet Concentrates and Pooled Whole-Blood-Derived Platelet Concentrates].
abstract: According to the risk estimates of the Robert-Koch-Institute (RKI) and the Paul Ehrlich-Institute (PEI) an equivalence cannot be assumed to exist between the two different platelet preparations. Differences between single-donor (apheresis) platelet concentrates (ATK) and pooled whole-blood-derived platelet concentrates (PTK) result from donor populations, donation intervals, and preparation techniques. There are no prospective randomized studies with regard to the clinical efficacy, which would unambiguously demonstrate equivalence of the therapeutic efficacy of PTK (buffy coat method) in comparison to ATK. The German Association of Blood Transfusion Services (StKB) points out that, due to the non-equivalence of PTK and ATK, it is incumbent on the transfusion physician to select the platelet concentrate, make the appropriate disclosures, and assume treatment responsibility. Proper compensation for ATK and PTK must be ensured by the health insurance companies, whereby a special indication for the selection of either PTK or ATK is not given. Exceptions are patients with known HLA antibodies in which only selected platelet concentrates may be administered. Otherwise, no indication exists in the selection of the different platelet concentrates (Article is in German).
authors: Walter
authors: W
authors: Hitzler
authors: Gabriele
authors: G
authors: Hutschenreuter
authors: Herbert
authors: H
authors: Wartensleben
mesh_terms: D001781:Blood Component Removal / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods*; D001792:Blood Platelets; D006801:Humans; D061214:Patient Safety; D017713:Platelet Transfusion / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods*; D018570:Risk Assessment; D012307:Risk Factors; D016896:Treatment Outcome