title: When Is Rapid On-Site Evaluation Cost-Effective for Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy?
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) can improve adequacy rates of fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) but increases operational costs. The performance of ROSE relative to fixed sampling depends on many factors. It is not clear when ROSE is less costly than sampling with a fixed number of needle passes. The objective of this study was to determine the conditions under which ROSE is less costly than fixed sampling.
  
  
  METHODS
  Cost comparison of sampling with and without ROSE using mathematical modeling. Models were based on a societal perspective and used a mechanistic, micro-costing approach. Sampling policies (ROSE, fixed) were compared using the difference in total expected costs per case. Scenarios were based on procedure complexity (palpation-guided or image-guided), adequacy rates (low, high) and sampling protocols (stopping criteria for ROSE and fixed sampling). One-way, probabilistic, and scenario-based sensitivity analysis was performed to determine which variables had the greatest influence on the cost difference.
  
  
  RESULTS
  ROSE is favored relative to fixed sampling under the following conditions: (1) the cytologist is accurate, (2) the total variable cost ($/hr) is low, (3) fixed costs ($/procedure) are high, (4) the setup time is long, (5) the time between needle passes for ROSE is low, (6) when the per-pass adequacy rate is low, and (7) ROSE stops after observing one adequate sample. The model is most sensitive to variation in the fixed cost, the per-pass adequacy rate, and the time per needle pass with ROSE.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Mathematical modeling can be used to predict the difference in cost between sampling with and without ROSE.
authors: Department of Pathology, University of Utah School of Medicine and ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America.
authors: Robert L
authors: RL
authors: Schmidt
authors: ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America.
authors: Brandon S
authors: BS
authors: Walker
authors: Department of Pathology, University of Utah School of Medicine and ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America.
authors: Michael B
authors: MB
authors: Cohen
mesh_terms: D000465:Algorithms; D044963:Biopsy, Fine-Needle / Q000191:economics* / Q000379:methods; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D006801:Humans; D008962:Models, Theoretical