Critical notes on stigma and medicalization according to the psycological and athropological view.
This article aims to reflect on ethical aspects involved in the social sciences and humanities researches conducted in the educational context. In this debate, which goes beyond the limits of Resolution 466/2012 and the Plataforma Brasil bureaucracies, we refer to Psychology and Anthropology critical readings in order to emphasize the ethical risks in the medicalized view of education and human development, which has contributed to the production of stigmas that reinforces school exclusion. As central elements of this questioning, we highlight: the debate about the illusion that research in humanities and social sciences do not imply ethical risks and the false dichotomy of biomedical sciences x social and human sciences within the research in psychology and anthropology in education. Attesting to the importance of such problems we referred to researches of national and international authors in the field of school /educational psychology and neuroscience. Through these considerations, the article concludes for the importance of ethical rigor in humanities and social sciences researches, focusing not only in the construction of the project and the methodological procedures of data collection, but also in the research results interpretations and in the publication of reports and scientific articles.
Faculdade de Educação, Universidade Federal da Bahia, Salvador, BA, BR, lyosviegas@gmail.com.
Lygia de Sousa
Lde S
Viégas
Fórum sobre Medicalização da Educação e da Sociedade, BR.
Rui Massato
RM
Harayama
Instituto de Psicologia, Universidade de São Paulo, BR.
Marilene Proença Rebello
MP
de Souza
D000883:Anthropology; D001938:Brazil; D006809:Humanities; D006801:Humans; D062528:Medicalization; D012942:Social Sciences