Freight on a Low-Carbon Diet: Accessibility, Freightsheds, and Commodities.
The freight infrastructure network (e.g., roads, railways, waterways, etc.) is the backbone of nearly all trade partnerships in the United States and abroad. The manner in which the individual portions of its constituent parts are interrelated or arranged plays an important role for determining the environmental footprint of goods moved within the network. Herein, we compare the spatial distribution of potential consumer-producer exchanges (i.e., accessibility) under varying greenhouse gas (GHG) budgets or preferences for minimal transportation-related GHG emissions. We conduct case studies using two freight modes (truck and intermodal rail) for two representative commodities: meat/seafood and paper articles. Results across all counties in the United States indicate that the geographic area in which trade is possible, given a GHG budget, varies by transportation mode, location, and commodity. Our results suggest that intermodal terminal availability is an important determinant of low-GHG accessibility. Since only a fraction of road-to-rail terminals accommodate meat/seafood (4.9%) and paper (0.7%), the United States could increase its expected GHG savings associated with truck-to-rail mode-switching policies by 70% (+20 kg CO2,e/ton for meat/seafood) and 310% (+30 kg CO2,e/ton for paper) by upgrading current terminals to allow the exchange of all types of goods.
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California , Berkeley, California 94720, United States.
Michael N
MN
Taptich
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California , Berkeley, California 94720, United States.
Arpad
A
Horvath
D002244:Carbon / Q000032:analysis*; D032821:Commodification; D005740:Gases / Q000032:analysis; D005843:Geography; D017752:Greenhouse Effect; D006801:Humans; D018986:Motor Vehicles; D014186:Transportation; D035501:Uncertainty; D014481:United States
D005740:Gases; D002244:Carbon