Shared decision-making in the context of unruptured intracranial aneurysms management.
Shared decision-making practice has been encouraged in several clinical settings. In this model, clinical decisions are defined by doctors and patients based on the principle of patient autonomy. Shared decisions have been argued as an ethical clinical practice during complex and uncertain clinical situations. The best management of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA) remains controversial. Despite the fact that shared decisions has probably been practiced, as far as we are aware it has not yet been evaluated, nor has it been standardized for patients presenting UIA. We aim to discuss possible roles, pros and cons of shared decision-making on the management of UIA.
Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, BR.
Luís Henrique de
LH
Castro-Afonso
Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, BR.
Daniel Giansante
DG
Abud
D001294:Attitude to Health; D003657:Decision Making / Q000941:ethics*; D006801:Humans; D002532:Intracranial Aneurysm / Q000628:therapy*; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations