Are video-based preference assessments without access to selected stimuli effective?
This study extended the findings of Snyder, Higbee, and Dayton (2012) by presenting items via video during a paired-stimulus preference assessment but without providing access contingent on selection. Subsequently, items identified as highly, moderately, and less preferred were assessed in a concurrent reinforcer assessment, which suggested that these items did indeed function as reinforcers.
KENNEDY KRIEGER INSTITUTE AND UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND, BALTIMORE COUNTY.
Daniel R
DR
Clark
TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY.
Jeanne M
JM
Donaldson
UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI.
SungWoo
S
Kahng
D000067877:Autism Spectrum Disorder / Q000150:complications; D001521:Behavior Therapy / Q000379:methods*; D002648:Child; D002653:Child Behavior Disorders / Q000209:etiology / Q000523:psychology* / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D057240:Patient Preference / Q000523:psychology*; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D012054:Reinforcement, Psychology; D014741:Video Recording
intellectual disabilities; stimulus preference assessment; technology; video