The effect of thermodynamic properties of solvent mixtures explains the difference between methanol and ethanol in C.antarctica lipase B catalyzed alcoholysis.
Kinetic modelling, molecular modelling, and experimental determination of the initial reaction velocity of lipase-catalyzed alcoholysis were combined to study the effect of the alcohol substrate to catalytic activity. The model system consisted of methanol or ethanol at varying concentrations, vinyl acetate as ester substrate 15.2% (v/v), toluene as organic solvent, water at a controlled thermodynamic activity of 0.09, and C. antarctica lipase B as enzyme. For both alcohol substrates, the initial reaction velocity increased sharply at low concentrations and reached a maximum at 0.7% (v/v) for methanol and 2% (v/v) for ethanol. For higher concentrations, the reaction rate decreased to a level of 74% and 60% of the peak value, respectively, due to substrate inhibition. The concentration dependency was described by a kinetic model, including a ping-pong bi-bi mechanism and competitive inhibition by the alcohol, and confirmed previous observations that methanol is more efficiently inhibiting the enzyme than ethanol. However, if the initial reaction velocity was expressed in terms of thermodynamic activity of the two alcohol substrates, the maximum of initial reaction velocity was similar for methanol (a MeOH(max)=0.19) and ethanol (a EtOH(max)=0.21). This was confirmed by molecular modelling which resulted in similar KM (0.22 and 0.19) and Ki values (0.44 and 0.49) for methanol and ethanol, respectively, if expressed in thermodynamic activities. Thus, the experimentally observed difference between methanol and ethanol is not due to differences in interaction with the enzyme but is a consequence of the thermodynamics of the substrate-solvent mixture. For low concentrations in toluene, the activity coefficient of methanol is 40% higher than the activity coefficient of ethanol (γ MeOH=8.5, γ EtOH=6.1).
Dept Biotechnology and Biosciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza della Scienza 2, 20126 Milan, Italy.
Francesco
F
Sasso
Institute of Technical Biochemistry, University of Stuttgart, Allmandring 31, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany.
Tobias
T
Kulschewski
Institute of Chemistry of Molecular Recognition, National Research Council, Via Mario Bianco 9, 20131 Milan, Italy.
Francesco
F
Secundo
Dept Biotechnology and Biosciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, Piazza della Scienza 2, 20126 Milan, Italy.
Marina
M
Lotti
Institute of Technical Biochemistry, University of Stuttgart, Allmandring 31, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany. Electronic address: Juergen.Pleiss@itb.uni-stuttgart.de.
Jürgen
J
Pleiss
D000431:Ethanol / Q000032:analysis / Q000737:chemistry* / Q000378:metabolism*; D005656:Fungal Proteins / Q000737:chemistry* / Q000378:metabolism*; D008049:Lipase / Q000737:chemistry* / Q000378:metabolism*; D000432:Methanol / Q000032:analysis / Q000737:chemistry* / Q000378:metabolism*; D062105:Molecular Docking Simulation; D012997:Solvents; D013816:Thermodynamics; D014050:Toluene / Q000032:analysis / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism; D014753:Vinyl Compounds / Q000032:analysis / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism
D005656:Fungal Proteins; D012997:Solvents; D014753:Vinyl Compounds; D014050:Toluene; D000431:Ethanol; D008049:Lipase; C431349:lipase B, Candida antarctica; C011566:vinyl acetate; D000432:Methanol
Model; Thermodynamic activity; Toluene; Vinyl acetate