Reliability of measuring pelvic floor elevation with a diagnostic ultrasonic imaging device.
[Purpose] The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability of measuring the amount of pelvic floor elevation during pelvic and abdominal muscle contraction with a diagnostic ultrasonic imaging device. [Subjects] The study group comprised 11 healthy women without urinary incontinence or previous birth experience. [Methods] We measured the displacement elevation of the bladder base during contraction of the abdominal and pelvic floor muscles was measured using a diagnostic ultrasonic imaging device. The exercise was a four-part operation undertaken with the subjects in the lateral position. The reliability analysis included use of the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to assess the reliability. [Results] ICC (1.1) values for the pelvic floor elevation measurement with a diagnostic ultrasonic imaging device were 0.98 [contraction of the transversus abdominis (TrA) muscle], 0.99 [contraction of pelvic floor muscles (PFMs)], 0.98 (co-contraction of the TrA and PFMs), and 0.98 (resistance of the TrA and PFMs). This study proved the reliability of the method because the coefficient of reliability was 0.97 or more for all of the measurements, even for those during exercise. [Conclusion] The diagnostic ultrasonic imaging device measures pelvic floor elevation with high reliability.
Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Science, Takasaki University of Health and Welfare, Japan ; Department of Physical Therapy, Health and Welfare Science Course, Graduate School of International University of Health and Welfare, Japan.
Hitomi
H
Ubukata
Department of Physical Therapy, Health and Welfare Science Course, Graduate School of International University of Health and Welfare, Japan.
Hitoshi
H
Maruyama
Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Care Sciences, Himeji Dokkyo University, Japan.
Ming
M
Huo
Bladder base; Pelvic floor muscles (PFMs); Stress urinary incontinence