The role of peer respect in linking abusive supervision to follower outcomes: Dual moderation of group potency.
We develop a model in which abusive supervision undermines individuals' perceptions of the level of respect they are accorded by their group peers, which in turn reduces their performance and disconnects them psychologically from the organization. High group potency strengthens each of these connections. We studied the theorized relationships across 3 periods during a 10-week residential organizational entry program. Group potency, representing shared group perceptions, moderated relationships at the individual level. These included the negative relationship between abusive supervision (Time 1) and perceived peer respect (Time 2) and the relationship between perceived peer respect and organizational commitment, organizational identification, and turnover intention (Time 3). We found stronger relationships between abusive supervision and perceived peer respect--and between peer respect and the attitudinal outcomes and turnover intention--among groups with higher potency. Perceived peer respect was also positively related to followers' task performance. We discuss implications of the conceptual framework and findings for future research and theory development concerning how groups and individuals respond to abusive supervision and to treatment by their peers.
Department of Management, Michigan State University.
John M
JM
Schaubroeck
Richard Ivey School of Business, Western University.
Ann C
AC
Peng
School of Business, Wake Forest University.
Sean T
ST
Hannah
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D058445:Bullying; D006126:Group Processes; D006801:Humans; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D008297:Male; D008889:Military Personnel / Q000523:psychology*; D010379:Peer Group; D010559:Personnel Management; D012933:Social Identification; D055815:Young Adult