Why is John More Likely to Become Department Chair Than Jennifer?
This article reviews some of our research on how gender stereotypes and their accompanying assumptions and expectations can influence the careers of male and female physicians and scientists in a myriad of subtle ways. Although stereotype-based cognitive biases may be invisible and unintentional, they nevertheless shape the experiences of women in academic medicine in ways that frequently constrain their opportunities. We present research on the following: 1) subtle differences in the evaluation of male and female medical students as revealed through text analysis of written evaluations at a critical career juncture, 2) how cultural assumptions about the way men and women should and should not behave influence medical residents' experiences as leaders, and 3) how approaching gender bias among faculty in academic medicine, science, and engineering as a remedial habit can be successful in changing individual behaviors and in improving department climate.
Madison, WI.
Molly
M
Carnes
Madison, WI.
Christie M
CM
Bartels
Madison, WI.
Anna
A
Kaatz
Madison, WI.
Christine
C
Kolehmainen
D002321:Career Choice; D002322:Career Mobility; D005180:Faculty, Medical; D005260:Female; D005783:Gender Identity; D006801:Humans; D007396:Internship and Residency; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D007587:Job Description; D007857:Leadership; D008297:Male; D010822:Physicians, Women / Q000523:psychology*; D012737:Sex Factors; D063507:Sexism; D013038:Specialization; D013337:Students, Medical / Q000523:psychology; D014933:Women's Rights; D014931:Women, Working / Q000523:psychology*