Variable Intensive Early Walking Poststroke (VIEWS): A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Converging evidence suggests that the amount of stepping practice is an important training parameter that influences locomotor recovery poststroke. More recent data suggest that stepping intensity and variability are also important, although such strategies are often discouraged early poststroke.



The present study examined the efficacy of high-intensity, variable stepping training on walking and nonwalking outcomes in individuals 1 to 6 months poststroke as compared with conventional interventions. Methods Individuals with unilateral stroke (mean duration = 101 days) were randomized to receive ≤40, 1-hour experimental or control training sessions over 10 weeks. Experimental interventions consisted only of stepping practice at high cardiovascular intensity (70%-80% heart rate reserve) in variable contexts (tasks or environments). Control interventions were determined by clinical physical therapists and supplemented using standardized conventional strategies. Blinded assessments were obtained at baseline, midtraining, and posttraining with a 2-month follow-up. Results A total of 32 individuals (15 experimental) received different training paradigms that varied in the amount, intensity, and types of tasks performed. Primary outcomes of walking speed (experimental, 0.27 ± 0.22 m/s vs control, 0.09 ± 0.09 m/s) and distances (119 ± 113 m vs 30 ± 32 m) were different between groups, with stepping amount and intensity related to these differences. Gains in temporal gait symmetry and self-reported participation scores were greater following experimental training, without differences in balance or sit-to-stand performance. Conclusion Variable intensive stepping training resulted in greater improvements in walking ability than conventional interventions early poststroke. Future studies should evaluate the relative contributions of these training parameters.
University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA tgh@uic.edu.
T George
TG
Hornby
Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Carey L
CL
Holleran
Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Patrick W
PW
Hennessy
Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Abigail L
AL
Leddy
Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Mark
M
Connolly
Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Jaclyn
J
Camardo
Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Jane
J
Woodward
Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Gordhan
G
Mahtani
Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Linda
L
Lovell
Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Elliot J
EJ
Roth
D000368:Aged; D015331:Cohort Studies; D005081:Exercise Therapy / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D006339:Heart Rate / Q000502:physiology; D006801:Humans; D033182:Intention; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D018709:Statistics, Nonparametric; D020521:Stroke / Q000503:physiopathology*; D000071939:Stroke Rehabilitation / Q000379:methods*; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D016138:Walking / Q000502:physiology*
exercise; locomotion; rehabilitation