30-Day Survival Probabilities as a Quality Indicator for Norwegian Hospitals: Data Management and Analysis.
BACKGROUND
The Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services (NOKC) reports 30-day survival as a quality indicator for Norwegian hospitals. The indicators have been published annually since 2011 on the website of the Norwegian Directorate of Health (www.helsenorge.no), as part of the Norwegian Quality Indicator System authorized by the Ministry of Health. Openness regarding calculation of quality indicators is important, as it provides the opportunity to critically review and discuss the method. The purpose of this article is to describe the data collection, data pre-processing, and data analyses, as carried out by NOKC, for the calculation of 30-day risk-adjusted survival probability as a quality indicator.


RESULTS
Three diagnosis-specific 30-day survival indicators (first time acute myocardial infarction (AMI), stroke and hip fracture) are estimated based on all-cause deaths, occurring in-hospital or out-of-hospital, within 30 days counting from the first day of hospitalization. Furthermore, a hospital-wide (i.e. overall) 30-day survival indicator is calculated. Patient administrative data from all Norwegian hospitals and information from the Norwegian Population Register are retrieved annually, and linked to datasets for previous years. The outcome (alive/death within 30 days) is attributed to every hospital by the fraction of time spent in each hospital. A logistic regression followed by a hierarchical Bayesian analysis is used for the estimation of risk-adjusted survival probabilities. A multiple testing procedure with a false discovery rate of 5% is used to identify hospitals, hospital trusts and regional health authorities with significantly higher/lower survival than the reference. In addition, estimated risk-adjusted survival probabilities are published per hospital, hospital trust and regional health authority. The variation in risk-adjusted survival probabilities across hospitals for AMI shows a decreasing trend over time: estimated survival probabilities for AMI in 2011 varied from 80.6% (in the hospital with lowest estimated survival) to 91.7% (in the hospital with highest estimated survival), whereas it ranged from 83.8% to 91.2% in 2013.


CONCLUSIONS
Since 2011, several hospitals and hospital trusts have initiated quality improvement projects, and some of the hospitals have improved the survival over these years. Public reporting of survival/mortality indicators are increasingly being used as quality measures of health care systems. Openness regarding the methods used to calculate the indicators are important, as it provides the opportunity of critically reviewing and discussing the methods in the literature. In this way, the methods employed for establishing the indicators may be improved.
Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, Oslo, Norway; Department of Medical Genetics, University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; NORMENT, KG Jebsen Centre for Psychosis Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Sahar
S
Hassani
Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, Oslo, Norway.
Anja Schou
AS
Lindman
Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, Oslo, Norway.
Doris Tove
DT
Kristoffersen
Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, Oslo, Norway.
Oliver
O
Tomic
Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, Oslo, Norway.
Jon
J
Helgeland
D015897:Comorbidity; D003953:Diagnosis-Related Groups; D017050:Episode of Care; D017052:Hospital Mortality; D006753:Hospital Records; D006761:Hospitals / Q000592:standards / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006801:Humans; D007902:Length of Stay; D009664:Norway / Q000453:epidemiology; D010343:Patient Admission / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D010351:Patient Discharge / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D010360:Patient Transfer; D011336:Probability; D058996:Quality Improvement; D019984:Quality Indicators, Health Care; D016019:Survival Analysis