Tiger, Bengal and Domestic Cat Embryos Produced by Homospecific and Interspecific Zona-Free Nuclear Transfer.
The aim of this study was to evaluate three different cloning strategies in the domestic cat (Felis silvestris) and to use the most efficient to generate wild felid embryos by interspecific cloning (iSCNT) using Bengal (a hybrid formed by the cross of Felis silvestris and Prionailurus bengalensis) and tiger (Panthera tigris) donor cells. In experiment 1, zona-free (ZP-free) cloning resulted in higher fusion and expanded blastocyst rates with respect to zona included cloning techniques that involved fusion or injection of the donor cell. In experiment 2, ZP-free iSCNT and embryo aggregation (2X) were assessed. Division velocity and blastocyst rates were increased by embryo aggregation in the three species. Despite fewer tiger embryos than Bengal and cat embryos reached the blastocyst stage, Tiger 2X group increased the percentage of blastocysts with respect to Tiger 1X group (3.2% vs 12.1%, respectively). Moreover, blastocyst cell number was almost duplicated in aggregated embryos with respect to non-aggregated ones within Bengal and tiger groups (278.3 ± 61.9 vs 516.8 ± 103.6 for Bengal 1X and Bengal 2X groups, respectively; 41 vs 220 ± 60 for Tiger 1X and Tiger 2X groups, respectively). OCT4 analysis also revealed that tiger blastocysts had higher proportion of OCT4-positive cells with respect to Bengal blastocysts and cat intracytoplasmic sperm injection blastocysts. In conclusion, ZP-free cloning has improved the quality of cat embryos with respect to the other cloning techniques evaluated and was successfully applied in iSCNT complemented with embryo aggregation.
Laboratory of Animal Biotechnology, Agriculture Faculty, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
L N
LN
Moro
Laboratory of Animal Biotechnology, Agriculture Faculty, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
J
J
Jarazo
Laboratory of Animal Biotechnology, Agriculture Faculty, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
C
C
Buemo
Laboratory of Animal Biotechnology, Agriculture Faculty, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
M I
MI
Hiriart
Laboratory of Reproductive Biotechnology, Zoological Garden of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
A
A
Sestelo
Laboratory of Animal Biotechnology, Agriculture Faculty, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
D F
DF
Salamone
D000818:Animals; D001755:Blastocyst / Q000166:cytology / Q000502:physiology; D002415:Cats / Q000196:embryology*; D002452:Cell Count / Q000662:veterinary; D019976:Cloning, Organism / Q000379:methods / Q000662:veterinary*; D046149:Embryo Culture Techniques / Q000662:veterinary; D047108:Embryonic Development; D053652:Nuclear Transfer Techniques / Q000662:veterinary*; D050814:Octamer Transcription Factor-3 / Q000032:analysis; D013045:Species Specificity; D020554:Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic / Q000662:veterinary; D046010:Tigers / Q000196:embryology*; D015044:Zona Pellucida / Q000502:physiology
D050814:Octamer Transcription Factor-3