title: [Ethical Evaluation of Non-Therapeutic Male Circumcision].
abstract: Elective circumcision for nonmedical reasons is a surgical approach which is historically long standing and accepted as the most performed procedure. The necessity of the procedure is usually for religious and traditional reasons alongside some medical ground related benefits to enable its social acceptability. The discussion of the subject from the aspect of ethics becomes necessary as there is no consensus about the benefits or harmfulness of nonmedical circumcision. Fundamental ethical discussions about circumcision, which contradicts legal acceptance criteria of any medical application, are related to the basic concepts of the existence of an individual such as sovereignty, the loss of bodily integrity, and privacy. The recent legal processes and the fact that the European Council and the American Academy of Pediatrics have put the issue on their agenda have increased the necessity of these ethical evaluations. The responsibility of consideration and evaluation of ethical permission of every circumcision procedure, besides discussing the necessity of circumcision for improvement and protection of health rests on the shoulders of the physicians because the dignity and intellectual identity of the profession require so.
authors.forename: M Cumhur
authors.initials: MC
authors.lastname: İzgi
mesh_terms: D002944:Circumcision, Male / Q000941:ethics*; D017558:Elective Surgical Procedures / Q000941:ethics; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D012068:Religion and Medicine; D014421:Turkey