title: Reforming automatism and insanity: Neuroscience and claims of lack of capacity for control.
abstract: This paper examines some of the issues raised by the current criminal law defence of automatism and the related defence of insane automatism, and considers what neuroscience may contribute to the reform discussion. It also considers some of the claims made in relation to the impact of neuroimaging in the courtroom. It examines an American medical case report in which an individual's criminal behaviour is linked to a brain tumour, and considers how the reformed law as presented in the Law Commission for England and Wales' Discussion Paper might treat such claims. It concludes by examining what assistance the law may gain from a deeper understanding of how a sense of agency emerges from brain states, and the implications of this scientific knowledge for the reform of the law.
authors.affiliation: School of Law, The Open University, UK lisa.claydon@open.ac.uk.
authors.forename: Lisa
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Claydon
mesh_terms: D001332:Automatism / Q000523:psychology*; D001927:Brain Diseases; D003416:Criminal Law / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D006801:Humans; D007298:Insanity Defense; D016743:Mental Competency / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D009488:Neurosciences; D006113:United Kingdom
keywords: criminal Law; defence of automatism; neuroscience and sense of agency