title: Caesarean Delivery Rate Review: An Evidence-Based Analysis.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  In 2007, caesarean deliveries comprised 28% of all hospital deliveries in Ontario. Provincial caesarean delivery rates increased with maternal age and varied by Local Health Integration Network. However, the accepted rate of caesarean delivery in a low-risk maternal population remains unclear.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To review the literature to assess factors that affect the likelihood of experiencing a caesarean delivery, and to examine Ontario caesarean delivery rates to determine whether there is rate variation across the province.
  
  
  METHODS
  Data sources included publications from OVID MEDLINE, OVID MEDLINE In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, OVID Embase, EBSCO Cumulative Index to Nursing & Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and EBM Reviews, as well as data from the Canadian Institute for Health Information Discharge Abstracts Database and the Better Outcomes and Registry Network.
  
  
  METHODS
  A mixed-methods approach was used, which included a systematic review of the literature to delineate factors associated with the likelihood of caesarean delivery and an analysis of administrative and clinical data on hospital deliveries in Ontario to determine provincial caesarean delivery rates, variation in rates, and reasons for variation.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Fourteen systematic reviews assessed 14 factors affecting the likelihood of caesarean delivery; 7 factors were associated with an increased likelihood of caesarean delivery, and 2 factors were associated with a decreased likelihood. Five factors had no influence. One factor provided moderate-quality evidence supporting elective induction policies in low-risk women. The overall Ontario caesarean delivery rate in a very-low-risk population was 17%, but varied significantly across Ontario hospitals.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The literature review included a 5-year period and used only systematic reviews. The determination of Robson class for women is based on care received in hospital only, and the low-risk population may have included data from women with obstetrical conditions that warranted a caesarean delivery.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  There is moderate-quality evidence that-compared with expectant management-an induction policy is associated with a decrease in caesarean delivery rates in low-risk women. There is significant caesarean delivery rate variation among Ontario hospitals.
authors.forename: N
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Degani
authors.forename: N
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Sikich
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D002585:Cesarean Section / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D007744:Obstetric Labor Complications / Q000453:epidemiology*; D009774:Obstetrics / Q000458:organization & administration; D009775:Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital / Q000458:organization & administration; D009864:Ontario / Q000453:epidemiology; D011247:Pregnancy; D011256:Pregnancy Outcome / Q000453:epidemiology*; D018566:Pregnancy, High-Risk; D019564:Unnecessary Procedures / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D055815:Young Adult