title: Three challenges to the complementarity of the logic and the pragmatics of science.
abstract: The bipartite metatheory thesis attributes to Rudolf Carnap, Philipp Frank and Otto Neurath a conception of the nature of post-metaphysical philosophy of science that sees the purely formal-logical analyses of the logic of science as complemented by empirical inquiries into the psychology, sociology and history of science. Three challenges to this thesis are considered in this paper: that Carnap did not share this conception of the nature of philosophy of science even on a programmatic level, that Carnap's detailed analysis of the language of science is incompatible with one developed by Neurath for the pursuit of empirical studies of science, and, finally, that Neurath himself was confused about the programme of which the bipartite metatheory thesis makes him a representative. I argue that all three challenges can be met and refuted.
authors.affiliation: University of Manchester, United Kingdom. Electronic address: thomas.e.uebel@manchester.ac.uk.
authors.forename: Thomas
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Uebel
mesh_terms: D019348:Empiricism / Q000266:history*; D049673:History, 20th Century; D008128:Logic; D012586:Science / Q000266:history*
keywords: Logical empiricism; Meta-philosophy; Otto Neurath; Philipp Frank; Rudolf Carnap