title: Skin testing versus in vitro testing in the evaluation of aeroallergy: The great debate.
abstract: When one examines reviews regarding diagnostic allergy testing, it generally is noted that the advantage of skin testing is that it uses testing to an end organ, is less expensive, is more sensitive, and provides immediate results, which are easily visualized by the patient. In the case of in vitro testing, it is thought to be more helpful for patients with dermographia or widespread dermatitis, is not affected by H1 or H2 antagonists, and is thought to be safer than skin testing. This may not be entirely correct because studies actually demonstrated phlebotomy to be associated with more morbidity than skin-prick testing. Other concerns regarding both tests include allergen quality, the need from proficiency testing, and the fact that these tests should be used for corroborating a diagnosis as opposed to a screening test for allergy.
authors.affiliation: Pulmonary and Allergy Associates, Summit, New Jersey and Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark, New Jersey, USA.
authors.forename: John
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Oppenheimer
mesh_terms: D000485:Allergens / Q000276:immunology*; D006801:Humans; D006967:Hypersensitivity / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000276:immunology; D012882:Skin Tests / Q000379:methods
chemical_list: D000485:Allergens