title: Consistent Comparisons of Attainment and Shortfall Inequality: A Critical Examination.
abstract: An inequality measure is 'consistent' if it ranks distributions the same irrespective of whether health quantities are represented in terms of attainments or shortfalls. This consistency property severely restricts the set of admissible inequality measures. We show that, within a more general setting of separate measures for attainments and shortfalls, the consistency property is a combination of two conditions. The first is a compelling rationality condition that says that the attainment measure should rank attainment distributions as the shortfall measure ranks shortfall distributions. The second is an overly demanding condition that says that the attainment measure and the shortfall measure should be identical. By dropping the latter condition, the restrictions on the admissible inequality measures disappear. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
authors.affiliation: Department of Economics, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. k.bosmans@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
authors.forename: Kristof
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Bosmans
mesh_terms: D054624:Health Status Disparities; D006305:Health Status Indicators; D006801:Humans; D012959:Socioeconomic Factors
keywords: attainment inequality; consistency; health inequality; shortfall inequality