title: Quality improvement training for core medical and general practice trainees: a pilot study of project participation, completion and journal publication.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Small-scale quality improvement projects are expected to make a significant contribution towards improving the quality of healthcare. Enabling doctors-in-training to design and lead quality improvement projects is important preparation for independent practice. Participation is mandatory in speciality training curricula. However, provision of training and ongoing support in quality improvement methods and practice is variable. We aimed to design and deliver a quality improvement training package to core medical and general practice specialty trainees and evaluate impact in terms of project participation, completion and publication in a healthcare journal.
  
  
  METHODS
  A quality improvement training package was developed and delivered to core medical trainees and general practice specialty trainees in the west of Scotland encompassing a 1-day workshop and mentoring during completion of a quality improvement project over 3 months. A mixed methods evaluation was undertaken and data collected via questionnaire surveys, knowledge assessment, and formative assessment of project proposals, completed quality improvement projects and publication success.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Twenty-three participants attended the training day with 20 submitting a project proposal (87%). Ten completed quality improvement projects (43%), eight were judged as satisfactory (35%), and four were submitted and accepted for journal publication (17%). Knowledge and confidence in aspects of quality improvement improved during the pilot, while early feedback on project proposals was valued (85.7%).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This small study reports modest success in training core medical trainees and general practice specialty trainees in quality improvement. Many gained knowledge of, confidence in and experience of quality improvement, while journal publication was shown to be possible. The development of educational resources to aid quality improvement project completion and mentoring support is necessary if expectations for quality improvement are to be realised.
authors.affiliation: Medical Directorate, NHS Education for Scotland, Glasgow, UK Duncan.mcnab@nes.scot.nhs.uk.
authors.forename: Duncan
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: McNab
authors.affiliation: Medical Directorate, NHS Education for Scotland, Glasgow, UK.
authors.forename: John
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: McKay
authors.affiliation: Medical Directorate, NHS Education for Scotland, Glasgow, UK Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, UK.
authors.forename: Paul
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Bowie
mesh_terms: D035081:Editorial Policies; D004503:Education, Medical, Graduate / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards; D058006:General Practice / Q000193:education*; D006801:Humans; D008611:Mentors; D010506:Periodicals as Topic; D010865:Pilot Projects; D016730:Program Development; D015397:Program Evaluation; D011643:Publishing / Q000592:standards*; D011785:Quality Assurance, Health Care; D058996:Quality Improvement; D012108:Research Personnel; D012606:Scotland
keywords: Quality improvement; assessment; feedback; medical training; publication