title: Receptive rationing: reflections and suggestions for priority setters in health care.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The purpose of this paper is to take forward consideration of context in health care priority setting and to offer some practical strategies for priority setters to increase receptiveness to their work.
  
  
  METHODS
  A number of tools and methods have been devised with the aim of making health care priority setting more robust and evidence based. However, in order to routinely take and implement priority setting decisions, decision makers require the support, or at least the acquiescence, of key external parties. In other words, the priority setting process requires a receptive context if it is to proceed unhindered.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The priority setting process requires a receptive context if it is to proceed unhindered.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This paper develops the concept of legitimacy in the "authorising environment" in priority setting and describes strategies which might help decision makers to create a receptive context, and to manage relationships with external stakeholders.
authors.affiliation: Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
authors.forename: Iestyn
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Williams
mesh_terms: D003659:Decision Making, Organizational; D015276:Health Care Rationing / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards*; D006292:Health Priorities / Q000458:organization & administration / Q000592:standards*; D006801:Humans; D033181:Information Dissemination / Q000379:methods; D007857:Leadership; D011057:Politics
keywords: Context; Decision making; Health care; Prioritization; Priority setting; Rationing