title: Reassessment of MTBE cancer potency considering modes of action for MTBE and its metabolites.
abstract: A 1999 California state agency cancer potency (CP) evaluation of methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) assumed linear risk extrapolations from tumor data were plausible because of limited evidence that MTBE or its metabolites could damage DNA, and based such extrapolations on data from rat gavage and rat and mouse inhalation studies indicating elevated tumor rates in male rat kidney, male rat Leydig interstitial cells, and female rat leukemia/lymphomas. More recent data bearing on MTBE cancer potency include a rodent cancer bioassay of MTBE in drinking water; several new studies of MTBE genotoxicity; several similar evaluations of MTBE metabolites, formaldehyde, and tert-butyl alcohol or TBA; and updated evaluations of carcinogenic mode(s) of action (MOAs) of MTBE and MTBE metabolite's. The lymphoma/leukemia data used in the California assessment were recently declared unreliable by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Updated characterizations of MTBE CP, and its uncertainty, are currently needed to address a variety of decision goals concerning historical and current MTBE contamination. To this end, an extensive review of data sets bearing on MTBE and metabolite genotoxicity, cytotoxicity, and tumorigenicity was applied to reassess MTBE CP and related uncertainty in view of MOA considerations. Adopting the traditional approach that cytotoxicity-driven cancer MOAs are inoperative at very low, non-cytotoxic dose levels, it was determined that MTBE most likely does not increase cancer risk unless chronic exposures induce target-tissue toxicity, including in sensitive individuals. However, the corresponding expected (or plausible upper bound) CP for MTBE conditional on a hypothetical linear (e.g., genotoxic) MOA was estimated to be ∼2 × 10(-5) (or 0.003) per mg MTBE per kg body weight per day for adults exposed chronically over a lifetime. Based on this conservative estimate of CP, if MTBE is carcinogenic to humans, it is among the weakest 10% of chemical carcinogens evaluated by EPA.
authors.affiliation: a Exponent Health Sciences , Oakland , CA , USA.
authors.forename: Kenneth T
authors.initials: KT
authors.lastname: Bogen
authors.affiliation: b Exponent Health Sciences , Washington , DC , USA.
authors.forename: Jacqueline M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Heilman
mesh_terms: D000393:Air Pollutants / Q000633:toxicity; D000818:Animals; D001711:Biotransformation; D002274:Carcinogens, Environmental / Q000633:toxicity*; D005557:Formaldehyde / Q000633:toxicity; D006801:Humans; D008738:Methyl Ethers / Q000633:toxicity*; D009153:Mutagens / Q000633:toxicity; D018570:Risk Assessment; D066007:Toxicokinetics; D014481:United States; D014484:United States Environmental Protection Agency; D014873:Water Pollutants / Q000633:toxicity; D020002:tert-Butyl Alcohol / Q000633:toxicity
chemical_list: D000393:Air Pollutants; D002274:Carcinogens, Environmental; D008738:Methyl Ethers; D009153:Mutagens; D014873:Water Pollutants; D005557:Formaldehyde; C043243:methyl tert-butyl ether; D020002:tert-Butyl Alcohol
keywords: DNA damage; PBPK models; cancer potency; cytotoxicity; epidemiology; formaldehyde; metabolism; methyl tert-butyl ether; mode of action; pharmacokinetics; risk assessment; tert-butyl alcohol; tumors