title: Recovery and Disinfection of Two Human Norovirus Surrogates, Feline Calicivirus and Murine Norovirus, from Hard Nonporous and Soft Porous Surfaces.
abstract: Human norovirus is a leading cause of foodborne disease and can be transmitted through many routes, including environmental exposure to fomites. In this study, both the recovery and inactivation of two human norovirus surrogates, feline calicivirus (FCV) and murine norovirus (MNV), on hard nonporous surfaces (glass) and soft porous surfaces (polyester and cotton) were evaluated by both plaque assay and reverse transcription quantitative PCR method. Two disinfectants, sodium hypochlorite (8.25%) and accelerated hydrogen peroxide (AHP, at 4.25%) were evaluated for disinfection efficacy. Five coupons per surface type were used to evaluate the recovery of FCV and MNV by sonication and stomaching and the disinfection of each surface type by using 5 ml of disinfectant for a contact time of 5 min. FCV at an initial titer of ca. 7 log PFU/ml was recovered from glass, cotton, and polyester at 6.2, 5.4, and 3.8 log PFU/ml, respectively, compared with 5.5, 5.2, and 4.1 log PFU/ml, respectively, for MNV with an initial titer of ca. 6 log PFU/ml. The use of sodium hypochlorite (5,000 ppm) was able to inactivate both FCV and MNV (3.1 to 5.5 log PFU/ml) below the limit of detection on all three surface types. AHP (2,656 ppm) inactivated FCV (3.1 to 5.5 log PFU/ml) below the limit of detection for all three surface types but achieved minimal inactivation of MNV (0.17 to 1.37 log PFU/ml). Reduction of viral RNA by sodium hypochlorite corresponded to 2.72 to 4.06 log reduction for FCV and 2.07 to 3.04 log reduction for MNV on all three surface types. Reduction of viral RNA by AHP corresponded to 1.89 to 3.4 log reduction for FCV and 0.54 to 0.85 log reduction for MNV. Our results clearly indicate that both virus and surface types significantly influence recovery efficiency and disinfection efficacy. Based on the performance of our proposed testing method, an improvement in virus recovery will be needed to effectively validate virus disinfection of soft porous surfaces.
authors.affiliation: Department of Biological Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29634, USA.
authors.forename: Thomas
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Yeargin
authors.affiliation: Department of Food, Nutrition, and Packaging Science, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29634, USA.
authors.forename: Angela
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Fraser
authors.affiliation: Department of Biological Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29634, USA.
authors.forename: Guohui
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Huang
authors.affiliation: Department of Food, Nutrition, and Packaging Science, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29634, USA. xiuping@clemson.edu.
authors.forename: Xiuping
authors.initials: X
authors.lastname: Jiang
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D017927:Calicivirus, Feline / Q000187:drug effects* / Q000302:isolation & purification; D002415:Cats; D002478:Cells, Cultured; D004202:Disinfectants / Q000494:pharmacology; D004203:Disinfection / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D051379:Mice; D029322:Norovirus / Q000187:drug effects* / Q000302:isolation & purification; D000067996:RAW 264.7 Cells; D012973:Sodium Hypochlorite / Q000494:pharmacology
chemical_list: D004202:Disinfectants; D012973:Sodium Hypochlorite