title: Attitudes of the general public towards the disclosure of individual research results and incidental findings from biobank genomic research in Australia.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Over the past decade, managing the disclosure of findings of genomic research has been the subject of extensive scientific, ethical and legal commentary and is a major challenge for biobanks.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To examine views of the general Australian public about the disclosure of individual research results (IRR) and incidental findings (IF) from biobank genomic research.
  
  
  METHODS
  A national computer assisted telephone interview was conducted amongst a representative sample of (n = 800) adult residents across each Australian State and Territory.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The majority of the Australian general public would be interested in receiving IRR and IF if they allowed their blood/tissue to be used in research; 94.4% (n = 800) reported that they would like to receive 'specific information obtained from your sample that may be important to your health or treatment', and 83.4% their 'potential genetic risk of an inherited disease'. Although fewer desired to receive 'any IF that were not directly related to your (potential) diagnosed condition' (70.0%), most would still like to receive IF. A latent class analysis on the desire to receive (or not) all types of results revealed differences in preferences in the information they wished to receive.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The majority of Australians desire to receive most information arising from research involving their tissue, including IRR and IF. Differences in the extent and type of information they desire to receive are noted. Biobanks must establish strategies to identify information needs of donors, assess research data and communicate with donors and donor families. Processes need to take account of differences in donor preferences and in the clinical or research context(s).
authors.affiliation: School of Public Health, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
authors.forename: J
authors.identifier: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9565-6883
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Fleming
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Swinburne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Critchley
authors.affiliation: Centre for Law and Genetics, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Otlowski
authors.affiliation: Faculty of Law, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Stewart
authors.affiliation: School of Public Health, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
authors.forename: I
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Kerridge
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001315:Australia / Q000453:epidemiology; D018070:Biological Specimen Banks / Q000941:ethics*; D035843:Biomedical Research / Q000941:ethics; D030881:Disclosure / Q000941:ethics*; D033002:Duty to Recontact / Q000941:ethics; D023281:Genomics / Q000941:ethics / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D017408:Guidelines as Topic; D006801:Humans; D033162:Incidental Findings; D008490:Medical Informatics / Q000379:methods*; D011639:Public Opinion; D035842:Research Subjects / Q000523:psychology; D014019:Tissue Donors
keywords: biological specimen biobanks; disclosure; incidental findings; research ethics; research results