title: A contrast between DEMATEL-ANP and ANP methods for six sigma project selection: a case study in healthcare industry.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The project selection process is a crucial step for healthcare organizations at the moment of implementing six sigma programs in both administrative and caring processes. However, six-sigma project selection is often defined as a decision making process with interaction and feedback between criteria; so that it is necessary to explore different methods to help healthcare companies to determine the Six-sigma projects that provide the maximum benefits. This paper describes the application of both ANP (Analytic Network process) and DEMATEL (Decision Making trial and evaluation laboratory)-ANP in a public medical centre to establish the most suitable six sigma project and finally, these methods were compared to evaluate their performance in the decision making process.
  
  
  METHODS
  ANP and DEMATEL-ANP were used to evaluate 6 six sigma project alternatives under an evaluation model composed by 3 strategies, 4 criteria and 15 sub-criteria. Judgement matrixes were completed by the six sigma team whose participants worked in different departments of the medical centre.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The improving of care opportunity in obstetric outpatients was elected as the most suitable six sigma project with a score of 0,117 as contribution to the organization goals. DEMATEL-ANP performed better at decision making process since it reduced the error probability due to interactions and feedback.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  ANP and DEMATEL-ANP effectively supported six sigma project selection processes, helping to create a complete framework that guarantees the prioritization of projects that provide maximum benefits to healthcare organizations. As DEMATEL- ANP performed better, it should be used by practitioners involved in decisions related to the implementation of six sigma programs in healthcare sector accompanied by the adequate identification of the evaluation criteria that support the decision making model. Thus, this comparative study contributes to choosing more effective approaches in this field. Suggestions of further work are also proposed so that these methods can be applied more adequate in six sigma project selection processes in healthcare.
authors.forename: Miguel A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Ortíz
authors.forename: Heriberto A
authors.initials: HA
authors.lastname: Felizzola
authors.forename: Santiago
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Nieto Isaza
mesh_terms: D003659:Decision Making, Organizational; D003661:Decision Support Techniques; D006296:Health Services; D006302:Health Services Research / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D008962:Models, Theoretical