title: Lack of renewal effect in extinction of naturally acquired conditioned eyeblink responses, but possible dependency on physical context.
abstract: Context dependency of extinction is well known and has extensively been studied in fear conditioning, but has rarely been assessed in eyeblink conditioning. One way to demonstrate context dependency of extinction is the renewal effect. ABA paradigms are most commonly used to show the renewal effect of extinguished learned fear: if acquisition takes place in context A, and extinction takes place in context B (extinction phase), learned responses will recover in subsequent extinction trials presented in context A (renewal phase). The renewal effect of the visual threat eyeblink response (VTER), a conditioned eyeblink response, which is naturally acquired in early infancy, was examined in a total of 48 young and healthy participants with two experiments using an ABA paradigm. Twenty paired trials were performed in context A (baseline trials), followed by 50 extinction trials in context B (extinction phase) and 50 extinction trials in context A (renewal phase). In 24 participants, contexts A and B were two different rooms, and in the other 24 participants, two different background colors (orange and blue) and noises were used. To rule out spontaneous recovery, an AAA design was used for comparison. There were significant effects of extinction in both experiments. No significant renewal effects were observed. In experiment 2, however, extinction was significantly less using orange background during extinction compared to the blue background. The present findings suggest that extinction of conditioned eyeblinks depends on the physical context. Findings add to the animal literature that context can play a role in the acquisition of classically conditioned eyeblink responses. Future studies, however, need to be performed to confirm the present findings. Lack of renewal effect may be explained by the highly overlearned character of the VTER.
authors.affiliation: Department of Neurology, University Clinic Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45138, Essen, Germany. jens.claassen@uk-essen.de.
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Claassen
authors.affiliation: Department of Neurology, University Clinic Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45138, Essen, Germany.
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Mazilescu
authors.affiliation: Department of Neurology, University Clinic Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45138, Essen, Germany.
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Thieme
authors.affiliation: Department of Biomedical Sciences, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, USA.
authors.forename: V
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Bracha
authors.affiliation: Department of Neurology, University Clinic Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45138, Essen, Germany.
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Timmann
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001307:Auditory Perception / Q000502:physiology; D001767:Blinking / Q000502:physiology*; D003118:Color Perception / Q000502:physiology; D003213:Conditioning, Psychological / Q000502:physiology*; D005108:Extinction, Psychological / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D055815:Young Adult
keywords: Context; Extinction; Eyeblink conditioning; Renewal