title: What next for environmental health?
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The aim of the wider research was to explore Health and Wellbeing Boards (HWBs) during their early development stages, with a focus on health inequalities and the role of environmental health (EH). This article presents empirical findings relating to challenges facing the EH profession in the new English public health (PH) system and offers new practical suggestions as to how they might be overcome in relation to educating and training the new generation of EH practitioners (EHPs).
  
  
  METHODS
  Four case study HWBs in the Midlands and North of England were followed for 18 months from early 2012. In addition, EHPs and managers from each English region were interviewed. In total, 50 semi-structured interviews were carried out, around 55 h of HWB meetings were observed, and documents associated with HWBs such as strategies and minutes of meetings were collected. Data were analysed thematically, both inductively and deductively, using Atlas.ti.
  
  
  RESULTS
  EH is largely invisible in the new PH system due to a variety of internal and external factors, including existing skill sets and practices. There is a new imperative to move away from reliance on statutory functions for funding and to engage with wider PH issues and colleagues, requiring new skills of evaluation and a change in perception from being 'doers' to include a greater role as 'thinkers'. This is being recognised by EHPs and managers, who are seeking ways to adapt to these new expectations.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Recent changes to the English PH system have led to a period of reflection and the beginnings of adaptation in EH to overcome new challenges. Linked to this is a need for graduate training to prepare new practitioners to think critically, to thrive and become high-level managers of the future, while being technically competent. We suggest a new, enhanced role for Chartered Institute of Environmental Health (CIEH)-accredited universities in securing the future of the profession by supporting new graduates. Specifically, a mentoring scheme could be introduced for the practical training element for new practitioners. This would help to embed criticality and evaluation in practice, provide consistency in training, and overcome the disconnect between academia and practice.
authors.affiliation: Health Policy Politics and Organisation Group, Centre for Primary Care, Institute of Population Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UKSchool of Geography Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK s.k.dhesi@bham.ac.uk.
authors.forename: Surindar
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Dhesi
authors.affiliation: School of Geography Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK.
authors.forename: Zena
authors.initials: Z
authors.lastname: Lynch
mesh_terms: D004739:England; D004782:Environmental Health / Q000193:education / Q000639:trends*; D006801:Humans; D011634:Public Health; D014495:Universities
keywords: Health and Wellbeing Boards; education and training; environmental health; public health