title: Meaning is Not a Reflex: Context Dependence of Spatial Congruity Effects.
abstract: In two experiments, Brookshire, Ivry, and Casasanto (2010) showed that words with positive and negative emotional valence can activate spatial representations with a high degree of automaticity, but also that this activation is highly context dependent. Lebois, Wilson-Mendenhall, and Barsalou (2015) reported that they "aimed to replicate" our study but found only null results in the "Brookshire et al. replication" conditions. Here we express concerns about three aspects of this paper. First, the study was not an attempt to replicate ours; it was a different study that adapted our method. Second, Lebois et al. did not accurately represent our theoretical position. Third, Lebois et al.'s main conclusion, that spatial congruity effects depend on the task context, was not supported by their data. Despite these concerns, we agree with Lebois et al.'s overall message that spatial aspects of words' meanings are activated differently in different contexts. This was a main conclusion of our study as well.
authors.affiliation: Psychology Department, University of Chicago.
authors.forename: Daniel
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Casasanto
authors.affiliation: Psychology Department, University of Chicago.
authors.forename: Geoffrey
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Brookshire
authors.affiliation: Psychology Department, University of California at Berkeley.
authors.forename: Richard
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Ivry
mesh_terms: D004644:Emotions; D006801:Humans; D012018:Reflex; D012660:Semantics
keywords: Conceptual metaphor; Context; Replication; Space; Valence