title: The Computational Fluid Dynamics Rupture Challenge 2013--Phase II: Variability of Hemodynamic Simulations in Two Intracranial Aneurysms.
abstract: With the increased availability of computational resources, the past decade has seen a rise in the use of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) for medical applications. There has been an increase in the application of CFD to attempt to predict the rupture of intracranial aneurysms, however, while many hemodynamic parameters can be obtained from these computations, to date, no consistent methodology for the prediction of the rupture has been identified. One particular challenge to CFD is that many factors contribute to its accuracy; the mesh resolution and spatial/temporal discretization can alone contribute to a variation in accuracy. This failure to identify the importance of these factors and identify a methodology for the prediction of ruptures has limited the acceptance of CFD among physicians for rupture prediction. The International CFD Rupture Challenge 2013 seeks to comment on the sensitivity of these various CFD assumptions to predict the rupture by undertaking a comparison of the rupture and blood-flow predictions from a wide range of independent participants utilizing a range of CFD approaches. Twenty-six groups from 15 countries took part in the challenge. Participants were provided with surface models of two intracranial aneurysms and asked to carry out the corresponding hemodynamics simulations, free to choose their own mesh, solver, and temporal discretization. They were requested to submit velocity and pressure predictions along the centerline and on specified planes. The first phase of the challenge, described in a separate paper, was aimed at predicting which of the two aneurysms had previously ruptured and where the rupture site was located. The second phase, described in this paper, aims to assess the variability of the solutions and the sensitivity to the modeling assumptions. Participants were free to choose boundary conditions in the first phase, whereas they were prescribed in the second phase but all other CFD modeling parameters were not prescribed. In order to compare the computational results of one representative group with experimental results, steady-flow measurements using particle image velocimetry (PIV) were carried out in a silicone model of one of the provided aneurysms. Approximately 80% of the participating groups generated similar results. Both velocity and pressure computations were in good agreement with each other for cycle-averaged and peak-systolic predictions. Most apparent "outliers" (results that stand out of the collective) were observed to have underestimated velocity levels compared to the majority of solutions, but nevertheless identified comparable flow structures. In only two cases, the results deviate by over 35% from the mean solution of all the participants. Results of steady CFD simulations of the representative group and PIV experiments were in good agreement. The study demonstrated that while a range of numerical schemes, mesh resolution, and solvers was used, similar flow predictions were observed in the majority of cases. To further validate the computational results, it is suggested that time-dependent measurements should be conducted in the future. However, it is recognized that this study does not include the biological aspects of the aneurysm, which needs to be considered to be able to more precisely identify the specific rupture risk of an intracranial aneurysm.
authors.forename: Philipp
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Berg
authors.forename: Christoph
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Roloff
authors.forename: Oliver
authors.initials: O
authors.lastname: Beuing
authors.forename: Samuel
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Voss
authors.forename: Shin-Ichiro
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Sugiyama
authors.forename: Nicolas
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Aristokleous
authors.forename: Andreas S
authors.initials: AS
authors.lastname: Anayiotos
authors.forename: Neil
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Ashton
authors.forename: Alistair
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Revell
authors.forename: Neil W
authors.initials: NW
authors.lastname: Bressloff
authors.forename: Alistair G
authors.initials: AG
authors.lastname: Brown
authors.forename: Bong Jae
authors.initials: BJ
authors.lastname: Chung
authors.forename: Juan R
authors.initials: JR
authors.lastname: Cebral
authors.forename: Gabriele
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Copelli
authors.forename: Wenyu
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Fu
authors.forename: Aike
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Qiao
authors.forename: Arjan J
authors.initials: AJ
authors.lastname: Geers
authors.forename: Simona
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Hodis
authors.forename: Dan
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Dragomir-Daescu
authors.forename: Emily
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Nordahl
authors.forename: Yildirim
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Bora Suzen
authors.forename: Muhammad
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Owais Khan
authors.forename: Kristian
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Valen-Sendstad
authors.forename: Kenichi
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Kono
authors.forename: Prahlad G
authors.initials: PG
authors.lastname: Menon
authors.forename: Priti G
authors.initials: PG
authors.lastname: Albal
authors.forename: Otto
authors.initials: O
authors.lastname: Mierka
authors.forename: Raphael
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Münster
authors.forename: Hernán G
authors.initials: HG
authors.lastname: Morales
authors.forename: Odile
authors.initials: O
authors.lastname: Bonnefous
authors.forename: Jan
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Osman
authors.forename: Leonid
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Goubergrits
authors.forename: Jordi
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Pallares
authors.forename: Salvatore
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Cito
authors.forename: Alberto
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Passalacqua
authors.forename: Senol
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Piskin
authors.forename: Kerem
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Pekkan
authors.forename: Susana
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Ramalho
authors.forename: Nelson
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Marques
authors.forename: Stéphane
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Sanchi
authors.forename: Kristopher R
authors.initials: KR
authors.lastname: Schumacher
authors.forename: Jess
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Sturgeon
authors.forename: Helena
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Švihlová
authors.forename: Jaroslav
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Hron
authors.forename: Gabriel
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Usera
authors.forename: Mariana
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Mendina
authors.forename: Jianping
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Xiang
authors.forename: Hui
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Meng
authors.forename: David A
authors.initials: DA
authors.lastname: Steinman
authors.forename: Gábor
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Janiga
mesh_terms: D017542:Aneurysm, Ruptured / Q000503:physiopathology*; D001783:Blood Flow Velocity; D001794:Blood Pressure; D002560:Cerebrovascular Circulation; D003198:Computer Simulation; D006801:Humans; D002532:Intracranial Aneurysm / Q000503:physiopathology*; D008955:Models, Cardiovascular; D033081:Shear Strength