title: Neuroscientific Prediction and the Intrusion of Intuitive Metaphysics.
abstract: How might advanced neuroscience-in which perfect neuro-predictions are possible-interact with ordinary judgments of free will? We propose that peoples' intuitive ideas about indeterminist free will are both imported into and intrude into their representation of neuroscientific scenarios and present six experiments demonstrating intrusion and importing effects in the context of scenarios depicting perfect neuro-prediction. In light of our findings, we suggest that the intuitive commitment to indeterminist free will may be resilient in the face of scientific evidence against such free will.
authors.affiliation: Department of Philosophy, Rutgers University.
authors.forename: David
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Rose
authors.affiliation: Department of Philosophy, University of Waterloo.
authors.forename: Wesley
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Buckwalter
authors.affiliation: Department of Philosophy, University of Arizona.
authors.forename: Shaun
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Nichols
mesh_terms: D003469:Culture; D006801:Humans; D019545:Intuition; D007600:Judgment; D008678:Metaphysics; D009488:Neurosciences; D026684:Personal Autonomy
keywords: Compatibilism; Cultural transmission; Free will; Importing; Intrusion effect; Neuroscience