Islet Xeno/transplantation and the risk of contagion: local responses from Canada and Australia to an emerging global technoscience.
This paper situates the public debate over the use of living animal organs and tissue for human therapies within the history of experimental islet transplantation. Specifically, the paper compares and contrasts the Canadian and Australian responses on xenotransplantation to consider what lessons can be learnt about the regulation of a complex and controversial biotechnology. Sobbrio and Jorqui described public engagement on xenotransplantation in these countries as 'important forms of experimental democracy.' While Canada experimented with a novel nation-wide public consultation, Australia sought public input within the context of a national inquiry. In both instances, the outcome was a temporary moratorium on all forms of clinical xenotransplantation comparable to the policies adopted in some European countries. In addition, the Australian xenotransplantation ban coincided with a temporary global ban on experimental islet allotransplantation in 2007. Through historical and comparative research, this paper investigates how public controversies over organ and tissue transplantation can inform our understanding of the mediation of interspeciality and the regulation of a highly contested technoscience. It offers an alternative perspective on the xenotransplantation controversy by exploring the ways in which coinciding moratoriums on islet allograft and xenograft challenge, complicate and confound our assumptions regarding the relationships between human and animal, between routine surgery and clinical experimentation, between biomedical science and social science, and between disease risks and material contagion.
University of Technology, Broadway, PO Box 123, Sydney, 2007 , NSW, Australia. myra.cheng@yahoo.com.au.
Myra
M
Cheng
D000818:Animals; D001315:Australia; D001709:Biotechnology / Q000941:ethics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000639:trends; D002170:Canada; D002986:Clinical Trials as Topic / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D003256:Community Participation; D000075202:Contraindications; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D005060:Europe; D006291:Health Policy; D006801:Humans; D016381:Islets of Langerhans Transplantation / Q000379:methods*; D011639:Public Opinion; D014019:Tissue Donors; D009927:Tissue and Organ Procurement / Q000639:trends; D014183:Transplantation, Heterologous / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000639:trends*; D014184:Transplantation, Homologous / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000639:trends
Moratorium; Public consultation; Research governance; Scientific controversies; Xenotransplantation