Why significant variables aren't automatically good predictors.
Thus far, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have been disappointing in the inability of investigators to use the results of identified, statistically significant variants in complex diseases to make predictions useful for personalized medicine. Why are significant variables not leading to good prediction of outcomes? We point out that this problem is prevalent in simple as well as complex data, in the sciences as well as the social sciences. We offer a brief explanation and some statistical insights on why higher significance cannot automatically imply stronger predictivity and illustrate through simulations and a real breast cancer example. We also demonstrate that highly predictive variables do not necessarily appear as highly significant, thus evading the researcher using significance-based methods. We point out that what makes variables good for prediction versus significance depends on different properties of the underlying distributions. If prediction is the goal, we must lay aside significance as the only selection standard. We suggest that progress in prediction requires efforts toward a new research agenda of searching for a novel criterion to retrieve highly predictive variables rather than highly significant variables. We offer an alternative approach that was not designed for significance, the partition retention method, which was very effective predicting on a long-studied breast cancer data set, by reducing the classification error rate from 30% to 8%.
Department of Political Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093;
Adeline
A
Lo
Department of Statistics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138; slo@stat.columbia.edu chernoff@stat.harvard.edu.
Herman
H
Chernoff
Department of Statistics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027.
Tian
T
Zheng
Department of Statistics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027 slo@stat.columbia.edu chernoff@stat.harvard.edu.
Shaw-Hwa
SH
Lo
D055106:Genome-Wide Association Study; D006801:Humans; D057285:Precision Medicine; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests
high-dimensional data; prediction; statistical significance; variable selection classification