Comparisons of Contraceptive Use between Rural and Urban Teens.
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of the study was to determine if barriers in rural areas might decrease an adolescent's likelihood of obtaining effective contraception. Previous studies have reported mixed results in comparisons of rural and urban contraception use.


METHODS
Electronic survey.


METHODS
Midwestern Public University.


METHODS
Undergraduate and graduate women.


METHODS
Questionnaire.


METHODS
Participants retrospectively recalled their contraceptive use and barriers to contraceptive use between the 9th and 12th grades.


RESULTS
A Barriers to Contraception Use Scale was created using exploratory factor analysis and yielded 31 questions with 1 underlying factor: barriers. Participants were identified as rural or urban using the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) definition and the participant's self-identification. Overall, rural participants endorsed more barriers to accessing contraceptives than urban participants using the OMB definition (χ(2) (2; n = 388) = 2.04; P < .05), and self-identification (χ(2) (2; n = 398) = 2.37; P < .05). However, no differences were found in contraception use according to the OMB definition, t (380) = -1.90; P = .06, or self-identification, t (380) = -2.11; P > .05. The Barriers to Contraception Use Scale total score predicted whether an individual would have a prescription for contraceptives 70.5% of the time compared to the base rate of 54.1%.


CONCLUSIONS
Although no rural-urban differences in actual contraception use were found, rural participants reported more barriers to accessing contraception, and those who endorsed more barriers were less likely to obtain contraceptives while in high school. Pregnancy prevention programs should thus take these barriers into account when developing future interventions.
Department of Psychology, University of South Dakota, 414 E Clark St, Vermillion, South Dakota. Electronic address: Savannah.peters@coyotes.usd.edu.
Savannah
S
Geske
Department of Psychology, University of South Dakota, 414 E Clark St, Vermillion, South Dakota.
Randal
R
Quevillon
Department of Psychology, University of South Dakota, 414 E Clark St, Vermillion, South Dakota.
Cindy
C
Struckman-Johnson
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of South Dakota Sanford School of Medicine, Sioux Falls, South Dakota.
Keith
K
Hansen
D000293:Adolescent; D003267:Contraception / Q000379:methods / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D003268:Contraception Behavior / Q000523:psychology / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D005163:Factor Analysis, Statistical; D005260:Female; D006297:Health Services Accessibility / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006801:Humans; D011247:Pregnancy; D012424:Rural Population / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D013334:Students / Q000523:psychology / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014505:Urban Population / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D055815:Young Adult
Adolescents; BCUS; Barriers; Contraceptives; Rural