The case for stronger regulation of private practitioners to control tuberculosis in low- and middle-income countries.
Tuberculosis case management practices of private practitioners in low- and middle-income countries are commonly not in compliance with treatment guidelines, thus increasing the risk of drug resistance. National Tuberculosis control programs have long been encouraged to collaborate with private providers to improve compliance, but there is no example yet of a sustained, large scale collaborations with private practitioners in these settings. Regulations have long been realized as a potential response to poor quality care, however there has been a lack of interest from the international actors to invest in stronger regulation of private providers in these countries due to limited evidence and many implementation challenges. Regulatory strategies have now evolved beyond the costly conventional form of command and control. These new strategies need to be tested for addressing the challenge of poor quality care among private providers. Multilateral and bilateral funding agencies committed to tuberculosis control need to invest in facilitating strengthening government's capacity to effectively regulate private providers.
Center for Health Policy and Management, Faculty of Medicine, Gadjah Mada University, Sekip Utara, Yogyakarta, 55281, Indonesia. yodi_mahendradhata@yahoo.co.uk.|Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Public Health, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. yodi_mahendradhata@yahoo.co.uk.
Yodi
Y
Mahendradhata
D019090:Case Management; D003906:Developing Countries; D019983:Guideline Adherence; D006801:Humans; D007182:Income; D011331:Private Practice; D014376:Tuberculosis / Q000517:prevention & control*