On Relationships Between Fixation Identification Algorithms and Fractal Box Counting Methods.
Fixation identification algorithms facilitate data comprehension and provide analytical convenience in eye-tracking analysis. However, current fixation algorithms for eye-tracking analysis are heavily dependent on parameter choices, leading to instabilities in results and incompleteness in reporting. This work examines the nature of human scanning patterns during complex scene viewing. We show that standard implementations of the commonly used distance-dispersion algorithm for fixation identification are functionally equivalent to greedy spatiotemporal tiling. We show that modeling the number of fixations as a function of tiling size leads to a measure of fractal dimensionality through box counting. We apply this technique to examine scale-free gaze behaviors in toddlers and adults looking at images of faces and blocks, as well as large number of adults looking at movies or static images. The distributional aspects of the number of fixations may suggest a fractal structure to gaze patterns in free scanning and imply that the incompleteness of standard algorithms may be due to the scale-free behaviors of the underlying scanning distributions. We discuss the nature of this hypothesis, its limitations, and offer directions for future work.
Child Study Center, Yale University.
Quan
Q
Wang
Child Study Center, Yale University.
Elizabeth
E
Kim
Child Study Center, Yale University.
Katarzyna
K
Chawarska
Department of Computer Science, Yale University.
Brian
B
Scassellati
Department of Computer Science, Yale University.
Steven
S
Zucker
Child Study Center, Yale University.
Frederick
F
Shic
Characterization and analysis; Pupil dynamics; Scan path comparison; Scanning strategies