The cost of feeding bred dairy heifers on native warm-season grasses and harvested feedstuffs.
Heifer rearing is one of the largest production expenses for dairy cattle operations, which is one reason milking operations outsource heifer rearing to custom developers. The cost of harvested feedstuffs is a major expense in heifer rearing. A possible way to lower feed costs is to graze dairy heifers, but little research exists on this topic in the mid-south United States. The objectives of this research were to determine the cost of feeding bred dairy heifers grazing native warm-season grasses (NWSG), with and without legumes, and compare the cost of grazing with the cost of rearing heifers using 3 traditional rations. The 3 rations were corn silage with soybean meal, corn silage with dry distillers grain, and a wet distillers grain-based ration. Bred Holstein heifers between 15- and 20-mo-old continuously grazed switchgrass (SG), SG with red clover (SG+RC), a big bluestem and Indiangrass mixture (BBIG), and BBIG with red clover (BBIG+RC) in Tennessee during the summer months. Total grazing days were calculated for each NWSG to determine the average cost/animal per grazing day. The average daily gain (ADG) was calculated for each NWSG to develop 3 harvested feed rations that would result in the same ADG over the same number of grazing day as each NWSG treatment. The average cost/animal per grazing day was lowest for SG ($0.48/animal/grazing d) and highest for BBIG+RC ($1.10/animal/grazing d). For both BBIG and SG, legumes increased the average cost/animal per grazing day because grazing days did not increase enough to account for the additional cost of the legumes. No difference was observed in ADG for heifers grazing BBIG (0.85 kg/d) and BBIG+RC (0.94 kg/d), and no difference was observed in ADG for heifers grazing SG (0.71 kg/d) and SG+RC (0.70 kg/d). However, the ADG for heifers grazing SG and SG+RC was lower than the ADG for heifers grazing either BBIG or BBIG+RC. The average cost/animal per grazing day was lower for all NWSG treatments than the average cost/animal per day for all comparable feed rations at a low, average, and high yardage fee. Results of this study suggest that SG was the most cost-effective NWSG alternative to harvested feeds for bred dairy heifer rearing.
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville 37996.
J K
JK
Lowe
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville 37996. Electronic address: Cboyer3@utk.edu.
C N
CN
Boyer
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville 37996.
A P
AP
Griffith
Department of Animal Science, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville 37996.
J C
JC
Waller
Department of Plant Sciences, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville 37996.
G E
GE
Bates
Department of Forestry, Wildlife and Fisheries, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville 37996.
P D
PD
Keyser
Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville 37996.
J A
JA
Larson
Department of Forestry, Wildlife and Fisheries, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville 37996.
E
E
Holcomb
D000818:Animals; D001947:Breeding; D002417:Cattle / Q000502:physiology*; D003365:Costs and Cost Analysis; D003612:Dairying / Q000191:economics*; D007887:Fabaceae; D005260:Female; D008897:Panicum; D012820:Silage / Q000191:economics*; D013714:Tennessee; D029921:Trifolium; D003313:Zea mays
Tennessee; bred dairy heifer; economics; grazing; native warm-season grass