Misidentifications of specific forms of cross-frequency coupling: three warnings.
Cross-frequency coupling (CFC) between neural oscillations has received increased attention over the last decade, as it is believed to underlie a number of cognitive operations in different brain systems. Coupling can take different forms as it associates the phase, frequency, and/or amplitude of coupled oscillations. These specific forms of coupling are a signature for the underlying network physiology and probably relate to distinct cognitive functions. Here I discuss three caveats in data analysis that can lead to mistake one specific form of CFC for another: (1) bicoherence assesses the level of phase-amplitude and not of phase-phase coupling (PPC) as commonly accepted; (2) a test for phase-amplitude coupling (PAC) can indeed signal phase-frequency coupling (PFC) when the higher frequency signal is extracted using a too narrow band; (3) an oscillation whose frequency fluctuates may induce spurious amplitude anticorrelations between neighboring frequency bands. I indicate practical rules to avoid such misidentifications and correctly identify the specific nature of cross-frequency coupled signals.
Department of Information and Communication Technologies, Center for Brain and Cognition, Universitat Pompeu Fabra Barcelona, Spain ; Auditory Language Group, Centre Médical Universitaire Geneva, Switzerland.
Alexandre
A
Hyafil
EEG methods; bicoherence; cross-frequency coupling; neural oscillations; phase-amplitude coupling