[Use of intravenous iron supplementation in chronic kidney disease: Interests, limits, and recommendations for a better practice].
Iron deficiency is an important clinical concern in chronic kidney disease (CKD), giving rise to iron-deficiency anaemia, and various impaired cellular functions. Oral supplementation, in particular with ferrous salts, is associated with a high rate of gastro-intestinal side effects and is poorly absorbed, a problem that is avoided with intravenous (IV) irons. Recently, with the approval of the European Medicines Agency's Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use, the French Agence nationale de sécurité du médicament et des produits de santé (ANSM) took adequate measures to minimize the risk of allergic reactions, by correction on the summary of intravenous iron products characteristics. All IV iron products should be prescribed, administered and injected, inside public or private hospitals exclusively, and a clinical follow-up after the infusion for at least 30 minutes is mandatory. The most stable intravenous iron complexes (low molecular weight iron dextran, ferric carboxymaltose, and iron isomaltoside 1000 [under agreement]) can be given in higher single doses and more rapidly than less recent preparations such as iron sucrose (originator or similars). Test doses are advisable for conventional low molecular weight iron dextrans, but are no more mandatory. Iron supplementation is recommended for all CKD patients with iron-deficiency anaemia and those who receive erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, whether or not they require dialysis. Intravenous iron is the preferred route of administration in haemodialysis patients, with randomized trials showing a significantly greater increase in haemoglobin levels for intravenous versus oral iron and a low rate of treatment-related adverse events during these trials. According ANSM, physicians should apply the product's label recommendations especially the posology. In the non-dialysis CKD population, the erythropoietic response is also significantly higher using intravenous versus oral iron, and tolerability is at least as good. Moreover in some non-dialysis patients, intravenous iron supplementation might avoid or at least delay the need for erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. Following the new ANSM's recommendations, we now have the ability to achieve iron stores replenishment correctly and conveniently in dialysis dependent and non-dialysis dependent CKD patients without compromising safety using the various pharmaceutical forms of iron products especially intravenous compounds.
Service de néphrologie, groupe hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, 83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France. Electronic address: jacques.rottembourg@wanadoo.fr.
Jacques
J
Rottembourg
Service de néphrologie et de dialyse, hôpital privé Claude-Galien, Ramsay générale de santé, 91480 Quincy, France.
Guy
G
Rostoker
D018798:Anemia, Iron-Deficiency / Q000188:drug therapy* / Q000209:etiology; D019587:Dietary Supplements; D017408:Guidelines as Topic; D006801:Humans; D007275:Injections, Intravenous; D058085:Iron Compounds / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000009:adverse effects; D006435:Renal Dialysis; D051436:Renal Insufficiency, Chronic / Q000150:complications / Q000188:drug therapy*
D058085:Iron Compounds
Allergic reactions; Chronic kidney disease; Complexes ferriques de fer; Fer intraveineux; Fer oral; Hemosiderosis; Hémosidérose; Intravenous iron; Iron complexes; Maladie rénale chronique; Oral iron; Oxydative stress; Réactions allergiques; Stress oxydatif