title: How to spot a statistical problem: advice for a non-statistical reviewer.
abstract: Statistical analyses presented in general medical journals are becoming increasingly sophisticated. BMC Medicine relies on subject reviewers to indicate when a statistical review is required. We consider this policy and provide guidance on when to recommend a manuscript for statistical evaluation. Indicators for statistical review include insufficient detail in methods or results, some common statistical issues and interpretation not based on the presented evidence. Reviewers are required to ensure that the manuscript is methodologically sound and clearly written. Within that context, they are expected to provide constructive feedback and opinion on the statistical design, analysis, presentation and interpretation. If reviewers lack the appropriate background to positively confirm the appropriateness of any of the manuscript's statistical aspects, they are encouraged to recommend it for expert statistical review.
authors.affiliation: Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK. d.c.greenwood@leeds.ac.uk.
authors.forename: Darren C
authors.initials: DC
authors.lastname: Greenwood
authors.affiliation: Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK. j.freeman@leeds.ac.uk.
authors.forename: Jennifer V
authors.initials: JV
authors.lastname: Freeman
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D017712:Peer Review, Research / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards*