title: Face-induced expectancies influence neural mechanisms of performance monitoring.
abstract: In many daily situations, the consequences of our actions are predicted by cues that are often social in nature. For instance, seeing the face of an evaluator (e.g., a supervisor at work) may activate certain evaluative expectancies, depending on the history of prior encounters with that particular person. We investigated how such face-induced expectancies influence neurocognitive functions of performance monitoring. We recorded an electroencephalogram while participants completed a time-estimation task, during which they received performance feedback from a strict and a lenient evaluator. During each trial, participants first saw the evaluator's face before performing the task and, finally, receiving feedback. Therefore, faces could be used as predictive cues for the upcoming evaluation. We analyzed electrocortical signatures of performance monitoring at the stages of cue processing, task performance, and feedback reception. Our results indicate that, at the cue stage, seeing the strict evaluator's face results in an anticipatory preparation of fronto-medial monitoring mechanisms, as reflected by a sustained negative-going amplitude shift (i.e., the contingent negative variation). At the performance stage, face-induced expectancies of a strict evaluation rule led to increases of early performance monitoring signals (i.e., frontal-midline theta power). At the final stage of feedback reception, violations of outcome expectancies differentially affected the feedback-related negativity and frontal-midline theta power, pointing to a functional dissociation between these signatures. Altogether, our results indicate that evaluative expectancies induced by face-cues lead to adjustments of internal performance monitoring mechanisms at various stages of task processing.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Julius-Maximilians-University, Marcusstr. 9-11, 97070, Würzburg, Germany. roman.osinsky@uni-wuerzburg.de.
authors.forename: Roman
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Osinsky
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Julius-Maximilians-University, Marcusstr. 9-11, 97070, Würzburg, Germany.
authors.forename: Jennifer
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Seeger
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Julius-Maximilians-University, Marcusstr. 9-11, 97070, Würzburg, Germany.
authors.forename: Patrick
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Mussel
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Julius-Maximilians-University, Marcusstr. 9-11, 97070, Würzburg, Germany.
authors.forename: Johannes
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Hewig
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001921:Brain / Q000502:physiology*; D003463:Cues; D004569:Electroencephalography / Q000379:methods; D005071:Evoked Potentials / Q000502:physiology*; D005145:Face / Q000502:physiology*; D030141:Feedback, Psychological; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010775:Photic Stimulation / Q000379:methods; D011597:Psychomotor Performance / Q000502:physiology*; D011930:Reaction Time; D055815:Young Adult
keywords: Contingent negative variation; Error-related negativity; Feedback-related negativity; Frontal-midline theta; Posterior medial frontal cortex