title: A Strategy to Identify Critical Appraisal Criteria for Primary Mixed-Method Studies.
abstract: The practice of mixed-methods research has increased considerably over the last 10 years. While these studies have been criticized for violating quantitative and qualitative paradigmatic assumptions, the methodological quality of mixed-method studies has not been addressed. The purpose of this paper is to identify criteria to critically appraise the quality of mixed-method studies in the health literature. Criteria for critically appraising quantitative and qualitative studies were generated from a review of the literature. These criteria were organized according to a cross-paradigm framework. We recommend that these criteria be applied to a sample of mixed-method studies which are judged to be exemplary. With the consultation of critical appraisal experts and experienced qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method researchers, further efforts are required to revise and prioritize the criteria according to importance.
authors.affiliation: McMaster University, Canada.
authors.forename: Joanna E M
authors.initials: JE
authors.lastname: Sale
authors.affiliation: McMaster University, Canada.
authors.forename: Kevin
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Brazil
keywords: critical appraisal; mixed methods; multiple methods; qualitative methods; quantitative methods