title: Faculty Performance on the Genomic Nursing Concept Inventory.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To use the newly developed Genomic Nursing Concept Inventory (GNCI) to evaluate faculty understanding of foundational genomic concepts, explore relative areas of strength and weakness, and compare the results with those of a student sample.
  
  
  METHODS
  An anonymous online survey instrument consisting of demographic or background items and the 31 multiple-choice questions that make up the GNCI was completed by 495 nursing faculty from across the United States in the fall of 2014.
  
  
  METHODS
  Total GNCI score and scores on four subcategories (genome basics, mutations, inheritance, genomic health) were calculated. Relationships between demographic or background variables and total GNCI score were explored.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The mean score on the GNCI was 14.93 (SD = 5.31), or 48% correct; topical category scores were highest on the inheritance and genomic health items (59% and 58% correct, respectively), moderate on the mutations items (54% correct), and lowest on the genome basics items (33% correct). These results are strikingly similar to those of a recent study of nursing students. Factors associated with a higher total score on the GNCI included higher self-rated proficiency with genetic/genomic content, having a doctoral degree, having taken a genetics course for academic credit or continuing education, and having taught either a stand-alone genetic/genomic course or lecture content as part of nursing or related course. Self-rated proficiency with genetic/genomic content was fair or poor (70%), with only 7% rating their proficiency as very good or excellent.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Faculty knowledge of foundational genomic concepts is similar to that of the students they teach and weakest in the areas related to basic science information.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Genomics is increasingly relevant in all areas of clinical nursing practice, and the faculty charged with educating the next generation of nurses must understand foundational concepts. Faculty need to be proactive in seeking out relevant educational programs that include basic genetic/genomic concepts.
authors.affiliation: Alpha Chi, Associate Professor, Boston College, William F. Connell School of Nursing, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA.
authors.forename: Catherine Y
authors.initials: CY
authors.lastname: Read
authors.affiliation: Delta Chi, Assistant Professor, Washington State University, College of Nursing, Spokane, WA, USA.
authors.forename: Linda D
authors.initials: LD
authors.lastname: Ward
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D002983:Clinical Competence; D004521:Educational Measurement / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D005181:Faculty, Nursing / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D005260:Female; D023281:Genomics / Q000193:education*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D015402:Nursing Education Research; D015403:Nursing Evaluation Research; D013338:Students, Nursing; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014481:United States
keywords: Concept inventory; education; faculty; genetic literacy; genomics; nursing