title: Weekend opening in primary care: analysis of the General Practice Patient Survey.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Seven-day opening in primary care is a key policy for the UK government. However, it is unclear if weekend opening will meet patients' needs or lead to additional demand.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To identify patient groups most likely to use weekend opening in primary care.
  
  
  METHODS
  The General Practice Patient Survey 2014, which sampled from all general practices in England, was used.
  
  
  METHODS
  Logistic regression was used to measure the associations between perceived benefit from seeing or speaking to someone at the weekend and age, sex, deprivation, health conditions, functioning, work status, rurality, and quality of life.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Out of 881 183 participants who responded to the questionnaire, 712 776 (80.9%) did not report any problems with opening times. Of the 168 407 responders (19.1%) who reported inconvenient opening times, 73.9% stated that Saturday opening, and 35.8% Sunday opening, would make it easier for them to see or speak to someone. Only 2.2% of responders reported that Sunday, but not Saturday, opening would make it easier for them. Younger people, those who work full time, and those who could not get time off work were more likely to report that weekend opening would help. People with Alzheimer's disease, learning difficulties, or problems with walking, washing, or dressing were less likely to report that weekend opening would help.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Most people do not think they need weekend opening, but it may benefit certain patient groups, such as younger people in full-time work. Sunday opening, in addition to Saturday, is unlikely to improve access.
authors.affiliation: Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich.
authors.forename: John A
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Ford
authors.affiliation: Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich.
authors.forename: Andy P
authors.initials: AP
authors.lastname: Jones
authors.affiliation: Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford.
authors.forename: Geoff
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Wong
authors.affiliation: Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich.
authors.forename: Nick
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Steel
mesh_terms: D039602:After-Hours Care / Q000191:economics / Q000458:organization & administration; D000554:Ambulatory Care Facilities / Q000191:economics / Q000458:organization & administration*; D001071:Appointments and Schedules; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D058006:General Practice / Q000191:economics / Q000458:organization & administration; D006291:Health Policy; D006297:Health Services Accessibility / Q000592:standards*; D006301:Health Services Needs and Demand; D006306:Health Surveys; D006801:Humans; D016015:Logistic Models; D010342:Patient Acceptance of Health Care / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D057240:Patient Preference; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D011216:Practice Management, Medical / Q000458:organization & administration; D011320:Primary Health Care / Q000191:economics / Q000458:organization & administration; D006113:United Kingdom / Q000453:epidemiology
keywords: appointments and schedules; delivery of health care; general practice; health priorities; health services accessibility; health services needs and demand; primary health care