title: [Mandibular advancement: bilateral sagittal split versus -distraction osteogenesis].
abstract: In the 1990s intra-oral distraction osteogenesis (DO) became available as an alternative for bilateral sagittal splitosteotomy (BSSO) for advancement of the mandible. It was thought that DO would lead to more stability in the results and fewer neurosensory disturbances of the inferior alveolar nerve. However, there was no scientific evidence for this assumption. This article describes a number of recently published, prospective studies that demonstrate that BSSO is not inferior to DO with respect to stability and neurosensory disturbances of the inferior alveolar nerve. They also demonstrate that BSSO leads to less pain in patients and to lower total costs. It can be concluded that BSSO should be considered the standard therapy for mandibular advancement up to 10 mm in non-syndromal patients.
authors.forename: V
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Akkerman
authors.forename: J P
authors.initials: JP
authors.lastname: Ho
authors.forename: E M
authors.initials: EM
authors.lastname: Baas
authors.forename: J de
authors.initials: Jd
authors.lastname: de Lange
mesh_terms: D020209:Cranial Nerve Injuries / Q000453:epidemiology; D006801:Humans; D019186:Mandibular Advancement / Q000379:methods*; D009426:Netherlands; D019857:Osteogenesis, Distraction; D059229:Osteotomy, Sagittal Split Ramus; D016896:Treatment Outcome