title: Animal models to study acute and chronic intestinal inflammation in mammals.
abstract: Acute and chronic inflammatory diseases of the intestine impart a significant and negative impact on the health and well-being of human and non-human mammalian animals. Understanding the underlying mechanisms of inflammatory disease is mandatory to develop effective treatment and prevention strategies. As inflammatory disease etiologies are multifactorial, the use of appropriate animal models and associated metrics of disease are essential. In this regard, animal models used alone or in combination to study acute and chronic inflammatory disease of the mammalian intestine paired with commonly used inflammation-inducing agents are reviewed. This includes both chemical and biological incitants of inflammation, and both non-mammalian (i.e. nematodes, insects, and fish) and mammalian (i.e. rodents, rabbits, pigs, ruminants, dogs, and non-human primates) models of intestinal inflammation including germ-free, gnotobiotic, as well as surgical, and genetically modified animals. Importantly, chemical and biological incitants induce inflammation via a multitude of mechanisms, and intestinal inflammation and injury can vary greatly according to the incitant and animal model used, allowing studies to ascertain both long-term and short-term effects of inflammation. Thus, researchers and clinicians should be aware of the relative strengths and limitations of the various animal models used to study acute and chronic inflammatory diseases of the mammalian intestine, and the scope and relevance of outcomes achievable based on this knowledge. The ability to induce inflammation to mimic common human diseases is an important factor of a successful animal model, however other mechanisms of disease such as the amount of infective agent to induce disease, invasion mechanisms, and the effect various physiologic changes can have on inducing damage are also important features. In many cases, the use of multiple animal models in combination with both chemical and biological incitants is necessary to answer the specific question being addressed regarding intestinal disease. Some incitants can induce acute responses in certain animal models while others can be used to induce chronic responses; this review aims to illustrate the strengths and weaknesses in each animal model and to guide the choice of an appropriate acute or chronic incitant to facilitate intestinal disease.
authors.affiliation: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Research Centre, Lethbridge, AB Canada ; Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB Canada.
authors.forename: Janelle A
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Jiminez
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB Canada.
authors.forename: Trina C
authors.initials: TC
authors.lastname: Uwiera
authors.affiliation: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Research Centre, Lethbridge, AB Canada.
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Douglas Inglis
authors.affiliation: Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB Canada.
authors.forename: Richard R E
authors.initials: RR
authors.lastname: Uwiera
keywords: Acute; Animal models; Biological; Chemical; Chronic; Incitants; Inflammation; Intestine