title: Higher photosynthetic capacity and different functional trait scaling relationships in erect bryophytes compared with prostrate species.
abstract: Ecophysiological studies of bryophytes have generally been conducted at the shoot or canopy scale. However, their growth forms are diverse, and knowledge of whether bryophytes with different shoot structures have different functional trait levels and scaling relationships is limited. We collected 27 bryophyte species and categorised them into two groups based on their growth forms: erect and prostrate species. Twenty-one morphological, nutrient and photosynthetic traits were quantified. Trait levels and bivariate trait scaling relationships across species were compared between the two groups. The two groups had similar mean values for shoot mass per area (SMA), light saturation point and mass-based nitrogen (N(mass)) and phosphorus concentrations. Erect bryophytes possessed higher values for mass-based chlorophyll concentration (Chl(mass)), light-saturated assimilation rate (A(mass)) and photosynthetic nitrogen/phosphorus use efficiency. N(mass), Chl(mass) and A(mass) were positively related, and these traits were negatively associated with SMA. Furthermore, the slope of the regression of N(mass) versus Chl(mass) was steeper for erect bryophytes than that for prostrate bryophytes, whereas this pattern was reversed for the relationship between Chl(mass) and A(mass). In conclusion, erect bryophytes possess higher photosynthetic capacities than prostrate species. Furthermore, erect bryophytes invest more nitrogen in chloroplast pigments to improve their light-harvesting ability, while the structure of prostrate species permits more efficient light capture. This study confirms the effect of growth form on the functional trait levels and scaling relationships of bryophytes. It also suggests that bryophytes could be good models for investigating the carbon economy and nutrient allocation of plants at the shoot rather than the leaf scale.
authors.affiliation: Key Laboratory of Mountain Ecological Restoration and Bioresource Utilization, Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 416, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
authors.forename: Zhe
authors.initials: Z
authors.lastname: Wang
authors.affiliation: Key Laboratory of Mountain Ecological Restoration and Bioresource Utilization, Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 416, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, People's Republic of China.
authors.forename: Xin
authors.initials: X
authors.lastname: Liu
authors.affiliation: Key Laboratory of Mountain Ecological Restoration and Bioresource Utilization, Chengdu Institute of Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 416, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, People's Republic of China. baowk@cib.ac.cn.
authors.forename: Weikai
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Bao
mesh_terms: D044002:Bryophyta / Q000033:anatomy & histology* / Q000502:physiology*; D002244:Carbon / Q000032:analysis; D002734:Chlorophyll / Q000032:analysis; D008027:Light; D009584:Nitrogen / Q000032:analysis; D010641:Phenotype; D010758:Phosphorus / Q000032:analysis; D010788:Photosynthesis / Q000502:physiology*; D018515:Plant Leaves / Q000502:physiology
chemical_list: D002734:Chlorophyll; D010758:Phosphorus; D002244:Carbon; D009584:Nitrogen
keywords: Growth form; Life form; Light interception; Nutrient distribution; Photosynthetic performance