title: From Sensory Signals to Modality-Independent Conceptual Representations: A Probabilistic Language of Thought Approach.
abstract: People learn modality-independent, conceptual representations from modality-specific sensory signals. Here, we hypothesize that any system that accomplishes this feat will include three components: a representational language for characterizing modality-independent representations, a set of sensory-specific forward models for mapping from modality-independent representations to sensory signals, and an inference algorithm for inverting forward models-that is, an algorithm for using sensory signals to infer modality-independent representations. To evaluate this hypothesis, we instantiate it in the form of a computational model that learns object shape representations from visual and/or haptic signals. The model uses a probabilistic grammar to characterize modality-independent representations of object shape, uses a computer graphics toolkit and a human hand simulator to map from object representations to visual and haptic features, respectively, and uses a Bayesian inference algorithm to infer modality-independent object representations from visual and/or haptic signals. Simulation results show that the model infers identical object representations when an object is viewed, grasped, or both. That is, the model's percepts are modality invariant. We also report the results of an experiment in which different subjects rated the similarity of pairs of objects in different sensory conditions, and show that the model provides a very accurate account of subjects' ratings. Conceptually, this research significantly contributes to our understanding of modality invariance, an important type of perceptual constancy, by demonstrating how modality-independent representations can be acquired and used. Methodologically, it provides an important contribution to cognitive modeling, particularly an emerging probabilistic language-of-thought approach, by showing how symbolic and statistical approaches can be combined in order to understand aspects of human perception.
authors.affiliation: Department of Brain & Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, United States of America.
authors.forename: Goker
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Erdogan
authors.affiliation: Department of Brain & Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.|Laboratory of Neural Systems, The Rockefeller University, New York, New York, United States of America.
authors.forename: Ilker
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Yildirim
authors.affiliation: Department of Brain & Cognitive Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, United States of America.
authors.forename: Robert A
authors.initials: RA
authors.lastname: Jacobs
mesh_terms: D000465:Algorithms; D019295:Computational Biology; D003198:Computer Simulation; D006801:Humans; D008959:Models, Neurological; D010465:Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D014110:Touch