title: Genomic Prediction Accounting for Residual Heteroskedasticity.
abstract: Whole-genome prediction (WGP) models that use single-nucleotide polymorphism marker information to predict genetic merit of animals and plants typically assume homogeneous residual variance. However, variability is often heterogeneous across agricultural production systems and may subsequently bias WGP-based inferences. This study extends classical WGP models based on normality, heavy-tailed specifications and variable selection to explicitly account for environmentally-driven residual heteroskedasticity under a hierarchical Bayesian mixed-models framework. WGP models assuming homogeneous or heterogeneous residual variances were fitted to training data generated under simulation scenarios reflecting a gradient of increasing heteroskedasticity. Model fit was based on pseudo-Bayes factors and also on prediction accuracy of genomic breeding values computed on a validation data subset one generation removed from the simulated training dataset. Homogeneous vs. heterogeneous residual variance WGP models were also fitted to two quantitative traits, namely 45-min postmortem carcass temperature and loin muscle pH, recorded in a swine resource population dataset prescreened for high and mild residual heteroskedasticity, respectively. Fit of competing WGP models was compared using pseudo-Bayes factors. Predictive ability, defined as the correlation between predicted and observed phenotypes in validation sets of a five-fold cross-validation was also computed. Heteroskedastic error WGP models showed improved model fit and enhanced prediction accuracy compared to homoskedastic error WGP models although the magnitude of the improvement was small (less than two percentage points net gain in prediction accuracy). Nevertheless, accounting for residual heteroskedasticity did improve accuracy of selection, especially on individuals of extreme genetic merit.
authors.affiliation: Department of Statistics, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506.
authors.forename: Zhining
authors.initials: Z
authors.lastname: Ou
authors.affiliation: Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824.
authors.forename: Robert J
authors.initials: RJ
authors.lastname: Tempelman
authors.affiliation: Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824 Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824.
authors.forename: Juan P
authors.initials: JP
authors.lastname: Steibel
authors.affiliation: Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824.
authors.forename: Catherine W
authors.initials: CW
authors.lastname: Ernst
authors.affiliation: Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824.
authors.forename: Ronald O
authors.initials: RO
authors.lastname: Bates
authors.affiliation: Department of Statistics, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506 nbello@ksu.edu.
authors.forename: Nora M
authors.identifier: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3902-1533
authors.initials: NM
authors.lastname: Bello
mesh_terms: D000465:Algorithms; D000818:Animals; D003198:Computer Simulation; D056726:Genetic Association Studies / Q000379:methods; D016678:Genome; D023281:Genomics / Q000379:methods; D008957:Models, Genetic; D010641:Phenotype; D019655:Quantitative Trait, Heritable; D013552:Swine
keywords: genPred; genomic breeding values; heteroskedastic errors; hierarchical Bayesian model; shared data resource; whole-genome prediction