title: Motion influences gaze direction discrimination and disambiguates contradictory luminance cues.
abstract: In two experiments, we investigated the role of apparent motion in discriminating left/right gaze deviation judgments. We demonstrated that discrimination accuracy and response confidence was significantly higher when the eyes were moved to the left or right, compared to when the eyes were presented in their final shifted position (static images). To dissociate the role of motion signals from luminance signals, gaze stimuli were also presented in reverse contrast. Replicating past studies polarity reversal had a profound and detrimental effect on gaze discrimination in static images, although, intriguingly, while response confidence remained low, participant performance improved as gaze angle increased. In striking contrast to these data, polarity reversal had no negative effect on performance when the eyes were moved. We discuss these findings in the context of a multiple-cue account of gaze perception.
authors.affiliation: Department of Cognitive Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 1, 1081 BT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. n.c.c.anderson@vu.nl.
authors.forename: Nicola C
authors.initials: NC
authors.lastname: Anderson
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
authors.forename: Evan F
authors.initials: EF
authors.lastname: Risko
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
authors.forename: Alan
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Kingstone
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D003463:Cues; D005260:Female; D005403:Fixation, Ocular; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D008297:Male; D009038:Motion; D009039:Motion Perception; D014796:Visual Perception; D055815:Young Adult
keywords: Gaze discrimination; Gaze perception; Social cognition; Visual perception