title: Evaluating suspected work-related neurologic disorders (clinical diagnosis).
abstract: The clinical diagnosis of work-related neurologic disorders is essentially one of exclusion because symptoms and signs are often nonspecific. The clinical reasoning requires a three-step approach: (1) establish the characteristics of the presenting disease; (2) ascertain that observed clinical features are consistent with those caused by the suspected agent(s); and (3) assess occupational exposures. A detailed history is of paramount importance in evaluating patients with suspected work-related neurologic disorders as it is in other clinical contexts, especially because in some circumstances it may represent the only criterion to establish causality. Thus, besides characterization of neurologic symptoms, including their location, quality, timecourse, and possible other associated symptoms, the work environment of the patient should be understood in full detail. In this respect, when a neurotoxin is suspected, then the history collection can be guided by the knowledge of the likely syndromes it produces. Similarly, physical examination should be directed to the target of toxicity/entrapment based on information from the work history. Although specific sites and elements of the nervous system may be affected depending on the offending agent, most neurotoxic disorders are characterized by generalized rather than focal neurologic abnormalities. Laboratory toxicologic tests have limited application for the etiologic diagnosis of neurotoxic disorders, except in cases of acute poisoning and in patients exposed to neurotoxic chemicals with prolonged half-life. In most cases examination takes place after the end of exposure, when the offending chemical is no longer detectable in body fluids. Electrophysiologic studies, in particular evoked potentials, electromyography, and conduction velocities, are important to confirm the organic basis of symptoms, particularly to detect subclinical or early neurologic involvement and to reduce the number of disorders to be considered in the differential diagnoses. In general, imaging studies with computed tomography and magnetic resonance are of limited utility in the evaluation of suspected neurotoxic disorders, except for helping to exclude other causes of the patient's clinical state. Improved conditions and safer practices in the workplace have led to a gradual shift in application of neuropsychologic evaluation from the assessment of severe neurotoxic damage to the evaluation of mild subclinical disturbances, and these tests are nowadays extensively used in screening workers exposed to neurotoxicants. Tools used in the screening of large groups of workers exposed to neurotoxicants may differ from those used in the clinic. Whereas some are obviously impractical, such as physical examination, others, such as, for instance, toxicologic tests, are used for biologic monitoring of exposure to ascertain compliance with occupational exposure limits.
authors.affiliation: Department of Cardiology, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy. Electronic address: marcello.lotti@unipd.it.
authors.forename: Marcello
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Lotti
authors.affiliation: Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
authors.forename: Michael J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Aminoff
mesh_terms: D004594:Electrophysiology; D006801:Humans; D009422:Nervous System Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000209:etiology*; D059906:Neuroimaging; D009784:Occupational Diseases / Q000150:complications*; D016273:Occupational Exposure / Q000009:adverse effects*; D010808:Physical Examination
keywords: diagnosis; electrophysiology; history; imaging; laboratory tests; neurobehavioral tests; physical examination