title: The Boussinesq Debate: Reversibility, Instability, and Free Will.
abstract: In 1877, a young mathematician named Joseph Boussinesq presented a mémoire to the Académie des sciences which demonstrated that some differential equations may have more than one solution. Boussinesq linked this fact to indeterminism and to a possible solution to the free will versus determinism debate. Boussinesq's main interest was to reconcile his philosophical and religious views with science by showing that matter and motion do not suffice to explain all there is in the world. His argument received mixed criticism that addressed both his philosophical views and the scientific content of his work, pointing to the physical "realisticness" of multiple solutions. While Boussinesq proved to be able to face the philosophical criticism, the scientific objections became a serious problem, thus slowly moving the focus of the debate from the philosophical plane to the scientific one. This change of perspective implied a wide discussion on topics such as instability, the sensitivity to initial conditions, and the conservation of energy. The Boussinesq debate is an example of a philosophically motivated debate that transforms into a scientific one, an example of the influence of philosophy on the development of science.
authors.affiliation: University of LausanneE-mail:thomas.mueller.2@unil.ch.
authors.forename: Thomas
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Michael Mueller
mesh_terms: D049672:History, 19th Century; D008433:Mathematics / Q000266:history*; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D012586:Science / Q000266:history*