title: The (de)politicisation of nuclear power: The Finnish discussion after Fukushima.
abstract: When the Fukushima accident occurred in March 2011, Finland was at the height of a nuclear renaissance, with the Government's decision-in-principle in 2010 to allow construction of two new nuclear reactors. This article examines the nuclear power debate in Finland after Fukushima. We deploy the concepts of (de)politicisation and hyperpoliticisation in the analysis of articles in the country's main newspaper. Our analysis indicates that Finnish nuclear exceptionalism manifested in the safety-related depoliticising and the nation's prosperity-related hyperpoliticisation arguments of the pro-nuclear camp. The anti-nuclear camp used politicisation strategies, such as economic arguments, to show the unprofitability of nuclear power. The Fukushima accident had a clear effect on Finnish nuclear policy: the government programme of 2011 excluded the nuclear new build. However, in 2014 the majority of Parliament again supported nuclear power. Hence, the period after Fukushima until 2014 could be described as continued but undermined loyalty to nuclear power.
authors.affiliation: University of Jyväskylä, Finland; Technical Research Centre of Finland (VTT), Finland.
authors.forename: Marja
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Ylönen
authors.affiliation: University of Jyväskylä, Finland.
authors.forename: Tapio
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Litmanen
authors.affiliation: University of Tampere, Finland.
authors.forename: Matti
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Kojo
authors.affiliation: University of Jyväskylä, Finland.
authors.forename: Pirita
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Lindell
mesh_terms: D005387:Finland; D062406:Fukushima Nuclear Accident; D055848:Nuclear Power Plants / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011057:Politics; D011639:Public Opinion
keywords: (de)politicisation; Finland; Fukushima; nuclear power debate