title: Genetic Parameters of Pre-adjusted Body Weight Growth and Ultrasound Measures of Body Tissue Development in Three Seedstock Pig Breed Populations in Korea.
abstract: The objective of this study was to compare the effects of body weight growth adjustment methods on genetic parameters of body growth and tissue among three pig breeds. Data collected on 101,820 Landrace, 281,411 Yorkshire, and 78,068 Duroc pigs, born in Korean swine breeder farms since 2000, were analyzed. Records included body weights on test day and amplitude (A)-mode ultrasound carcass measures of backfat thickness (BF), eye muscle area (EMA), and retail cut percentage (RCP). Days to 90 kg body weight (DAYS90), through an adjustment of the age based on the body weight at the test day, were obtained. Ultrasound measures were also pre-adjusted (ABF, EMA, AEMA, ARCP) based on their test day measures. The (co)variance components were obtained with 3 multi-trait animal models using the REMLF90 software package. Model I included DAYS90 and ultrasound traits, whereas model II and III accounted DAYS90 and pre-adjusted ultrasound traits. Fixed factors were sex (sex) and contemporary groups (herd-year-month of birth) for all traits among the models. Additionally, model I and II considered a linear covariate of final weight on the ultrasound measure traits. Heritability (h(2)) estimates for DAYS90, BF, EMA, and RCP ranged from 0.36 to 0.42, 0.34 to 0.43, 0.20 to 0.22, and 0.39 to 0.45, respectively, among the models. The h(2) estimates of DAYS90 from model II and III were also somewhat similar. The h(2) for ABF, AEMA, and ARCP were 0.35 to 0.44, 0.20 to 0.25, and 0.41 to 0.46, respectively. Our heritability estimates varied mostly among the breeds. The genetic correlations (rG) were moderately negative between DAYS90 and BF (-0.29 to -0.38), and between DAYS90 and EMA (-0.16 to -0.26). BF had strong rG with RCP (-0.87 to -0.93). Moderately positive rG existed between DAYS90 and RCP (0.20 to 0.28) and between EMA and RCP (0.35 to 0.44) among the breeds. For DAYS90, model II and III, its correlations with ABF, AEMA, and ARCP were mostly low or negligible except the rG between DAYS90 and AEMA from model III (0.27 to 0.30). The rG between AEMA and ABF and between AEMA and ARCP were moderate but with negative and positive signs, respectively; also reflected influence of pre-adjustments. However, the rG between BF and RCP remained non-influential to trait pre-adjustments or covariable fits. Therefore, we conclude that ultrasound measures taken at a body weight of about 90 kg as the test final should be adjusted for body weight growth. Our adjustment formulas, particularly those for BF and EMA, should be revised further to accommodate the added variation due to different performance testing endpoints with regard to differential growth in body composition.
authors.affiliation: Korea Animal Improvement Association, Seoul 137-811, Korea .
authors.forename: Yun Ho
authors.initials: YH
authors.lastname: Choy
authors.affiliation: Korea Animal Improvement Association, Seoul 137-811, Korea .
authors.forename: Alam
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Mahboob
authors.affiliation: Korea Animal Improvement Association, Seoul 137-811, Korea .
authors.forename: Chung Il
authors.initials: CI
authors.lastname: Cho
authors.affiliation: Korea Animal Improvement Association, Seoul 137-811, Korea .
authors.forename: Jae Gwan
authors.initials: JG
authors.lastname: Choi
authors.affiliation: Korea Animal Improvement Association, Seoul 137-811, Korea .
authors.forename: Im Soo
authors.initials: IS
authors.lastname: Choi
authors.affiliation: Korea Animal Improvement Association, Seoul 137-811, Korea .
authors.forename: Tae Jeong
authors.initials: TJ
authors.lastname: Choi
authors.affiliation: Korea Animal Improvement Association, Seoul 137-811, Korea .
authors.forename: Kwang Hyun
authors.initials: KH
authors.lastname: Cho
authors.affiliation: Korea Animal Improvement Association, Seoul 137-811, Korea .
authors.forename: Byoung Ho
authors.initials: BH
authors.lastname: Park
keywords: Genetic Correlation; Growth Trait; Heritability; Pig; Ultrasound Measures