title: The funding landscape for HIV in Asia and the Pacific.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Despite recent and robust economic growth across the Asia-Pacific region, the majority of low- and middle-income countries in the region remain dependent on some donor support for HIV programmes. We describe the availability of bilateral and multilateral official development assistance (ODA) for HIV programmes in the region.
  
  
  METHODS
  The donor countries considered in this analysis are Australia, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, the United Kingdom and the United States. To estimate bilateral and multilateral ODA financing for HIV programmes in the Asia-Pacific region between 2004 and 2013, we obtained funding data from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Creditor Reporting System database. Where possible, we checked these amounts against the funding data available from government aid agencies. Estimates of multilateral ODA financing for HIV/AIDS were based on the country allocations announcement by the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (the Global Fund) for the period 2014 to 2016.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Countries in the Asia-Pacific region receive the largest share of aid for HIV from the Global Fund. Bilateral funding for HIV in the region has been relatively stable over the last decade and is projected to remain below 10% of the worldwide response to the epidemic. Bilateral donors continue to prioritize ODA for HIV to other regions, particularly sub-Saharan Africa; Australia is an exception in prioritizing the Asia-Pacific region, but the United States is the bilateral donor providing the greatest amount of assistance in the region. Funding from the Global Fund has increased consistently since 2005, reaching a total of US$1.2 billion for the Asia-Pacific region from 2014 to 2016.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Even with Global Fund allocations, countries in the Asia-Pacific region will not have enough resources to meet their epidemiological targets. Prevention funding is particularly vulnerable and requires greater domestic leadership and coordination. Bilateral donors are still crucially important in the response to HIV throughout the Asia-Pacific region.
authors.affiliation: The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.|Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.|The Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia.
authors.forename: Robyn M
authors.initials: RM
authors.lastname: Stuart
authors.forename: Eric
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Lief
authors.affiliation: The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
authors.forename: Braedon
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Donald
authors.affiliation: Global HIV/AIDS Program, The World Bank, Washington, DC, USA.
authors.forename: David
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Wilson
authors.affiliation: The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.|The Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia; dwilson@unsw.edu.au.
authors.forename: David P
authors.initials: DP
authors.lastname: Wilson
mesh_terms: D001208:Asia; D014943:Global Health / Q000191:economics*; D015658:HIV Infections / Q000517:prevention & control*; D006801:Humans
keywords: Asia; HIV; Pacific; bilateral; funding; multilateral