title: Applied ethics: Have we lost a crucial opportunity?
abstract: Comments on the article, "Guidelines for competency development and measurement in rehabilitation psychology postdoctoral training," by Stiers et al. (see record 2014-55195-001). A review of the recent publication of Stiers et al., a well-organized distillation of the functional competencies required of practitioners of Rehabilitation Psychology that evolved from the Baltimore Consensus Conference (Stiers et al., 2012), revealed a potentially important omission in the section labeled Structured Observations of Competencies in Assessment and Intervention (Table 4, p. 117). Throughout the subsections regarding Knowledge, Skills/Abilities, and Attitudes/ Values, indirect reference to the American Psychological Association (APA) Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct (APA, 2010) is evident without formal citation of the Code. The concepts operationalized in the APA ethical principles suffuse the content of this section of the competencies, but without direct reference to those principles. The remainder of the tables (5-7, pp. 188 -120) include explicit inclusion of knowledge of ethics in the contexts of demonstrating competencies in consultation, research and evaluation, teaching and supervision, and management and administration.
authors.affiliation: College of Public Health & Health Professions, University of Florida.
authors.forename: Thomas R
authors.initials: TR
authors.lastname: Kerkhoff
authors.affiliation: College of Public Health & Health Professions, University of Florida.
authors.forename: Stephanie L
authors.initials: SL
authors.lastname: Hanson
mesh_terms: D002908:Chronic Disease / Q000523:psychology* / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D002983:Clinical Competence; D004500:Education, Graduate; D017408:Guidelines as Topic; D006801:Humans; D011584:Psychology / Q000193:education*