title: Dopant profiling based on scanning electron and helium ion microscopy.
abstract: In this paper, we evaluate and compare doping contrast generated inside the scanning electron microscope (SEM) and scanning helium ion microscope (SHIM). Specialised energy-filtering techniques are often required to produce strong doping contrast to map donor distributions using the secondary electron (SE) signal in the SEM. However, strong doping contrast can be obtained from n-type regions in the SHIM, even without energy-filtering. This SHIM technique is more sensitive than the SEM to donor density changes above its sensitivity threshold, i.e. of the order of 10(16) or 10(17)donorscm(-3) respectively on specimens with or without a p-n junction; its sensitivity limit is well above 2×10(17)acceptorscm(-3) on specimens with or without a p-n junction. Good correlation is found between the widths and slopes of experimentally measured doping contrast profiles of thin p-layers and the calculated widths and slopes of the potential energy distributions across these layers, at a depth of 1 to 3nm and 5 to 10nm below the surface in the SHIM and the SEM respectively. This is consistent with the mean escape depth of SEs in silicon being about 1.8nm and 7nm in the SHIM and SEM respectively, and we conclude that short escape depth, low energy SE signals are most suitable for donor profiling.
authors.affiliation: Centre for Advanced Photonics and Electronics, Electrical Engineering Division, Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, 9 JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0FA, UK. Electronic address: kwac2@cam.ac.uk.
authors.forename: Augustus K W
authors.initials: AKW
authors.lastname: Chee
authors.affiliation: University of Southampton, Electronics and Computer Science, Highfield, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK.
authors.forename: Stuart A
authors.initials: SA
authors.lastname: Boden
keywords: Doping contrast; Electric potentials; Escape depth; P–n junction; Secondary electron energy filtering; Sensitivity limit; Surface band-bending