title: In Defense of Theory.
abstract: Formal theories of mental representation have receded from the importance they had in the early days of cognitive science. I argue that such theories are crucial in any mental domain, not just for their own sake, but to guide experimental inquiry, as well as to integrate the domain into the mind as a whole. To illustrate the criteria of adequacy for theories of mental representation, I compare two theoretical approaches to language: classical generative grammar (Chomsky, 1965, 1981, 1995) and the parallel architecture (Jackendoff, 1997, 2002). The grounds for comparison include (a) the internal coherence of the theory across phonology, syntax, and semantics; (b) the relation of language to other mental faculties; (c) the relationship between grammar and lexicon; (d) relevance to theories of language processing; and (e) the possibility of languages with little or no syntax.
authors.affiliation: Center for Cognitive Studies, Tufts University.
authors.forename: Ray
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Jackendoff
mesh_terms: D001921:Brain; D006801:Humans; D007092:Imagination; D007802:Language; D007858:Learning; D008037:Linguistics; D011582:Psychological Theory
keywords: Language processing; Lexicon; Mental representation; Rules of grammar; Syntax