title: Five-year experience of cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Cementless unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) was introduced to address some of the problems that can occur following cemented UKR. The aim of this study was to report the 5-year experience of the first 512 medial cementless Oxford UKR implanted by two surgeons for the recommended indications.
  
  
  METHODS
  The first consecutive 512 cementless Phase 3 Oxford UKRs implanted by two surgeons for the recommended indications between June 2004 and October 2013 were prospectively identified and followed up independently. All the procedures were carried out through a minimally invasive approach without eversion or dislocation of the patella. Patients were assessed clinically pre-operatively and at 1, 2, 5, 7 and 10 years after surgery with functional outcome scores and radiographs.
  
  
  RESULTS
  There were eight reoperations of which six were revisions giving a 5-year survival of 98 % (95 % CI 94-100 %). At a mean follow-up of 3.4 years (1.0-10.2), the mean OKS was 43 (SD 7), AKSS (objective) was 81 (SD 13), and AKSS (functional) was 86 (SD 17). The first 120 cases had a minimum follow-up of 5 years (mean 5.9; range 5-10.2). In these patients, the mean OKS was 41 (SD 8), AKSS (objective) was 81 (SD 14), and AKSS (functional) was 82 (SD 18). There were no femoral radiolucencies and no complete tibial radiolucencies. 11 % of tibial components had partial radiolucent lines; the remaining 89 % had no radiolucencies.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The clinical results are as good as or better than those previously reported for cemented fixation. The radiographic results are better with secure bony attachment to the implants in every case.
  
  
  METHODS
  IV.
authors.affiliation: Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Windmill Road, Oxford, UK.|Nuffield Department for Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences (NDORMS), University of Oxford, Windmill Road, Oxford, UK.
authors.forename: H G
authors.initials: HG
authors.lastname: Pandit
authors.affiliation: Nuffield Department for Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences (NDORMS), University of Oxford, Windmill Road, Oxford, UK.
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Campi
authors.affiliation: Nuffield Department for Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences (NDORMS), University of Oxford, Windmill Road, Oxford, UK. thomas.hamilton@ndorms.ox.ac.uk.
authors.forename: T W
authors.initials: TW
authors.lastname: Hamilton
authors.affiliation: Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Windmill Road, Oxford, UK.
authors.forename: O D
authors.initials: OD
authors.lastname: Dada
authors.affiliation: Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Windmill Road, Oxford, UK.
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Pollalis
authors.affiliation: Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Windmill Road, Oxford, UK.
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Jenkins
authors.affiliation: Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Windmill Road, Oxford, UK.
authors.forename: C A F
authors.initials: CAF
authors.lastname: Dodd
authors.affiliation: Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Windmill Road, Oxford, UK.|Nuffield Department for Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences (NDORMS), University of Oxford, Windmill Road, Oxford, UK.
authors.forename: D W
authors.initials: DW
authors.lastname: Murray
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D019645:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee / Q000379:methods*; D001843:Bone Cements; D015331:Cohort Studies; D005260:Female; D005269:Femur / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D006801:Humans; D007720:Knee Prosthesis; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D020370:Osteoarthritis, Knee / Q000601:surgery*; D010329:Patella; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011474:Prosthesis Design; D011859:Radiography; D012086:Reoperation; D013977:Tibia / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D016896:Treatment Outcome
chemical_list: D001843:Bone Cements
keywords: Cementless fixation; Functional outcome; Implant survival; Unicompartmental knee replacement