title: Ethical Perspective: Five Unacceptable Trade-offs on the Path to Universal Health Coverage.
abstract: This article discusses what ethicists have called "unacceptable trade-offs" in health policy choices related to universal health coverage (UHC). Since the fiscal space is constrained, trade-offs need to be made. But some trade-offs are unacceptable on the path to universal coverage. Unacceptable choices include, among other examples from low-income countries, to expand coverage for services with lower priority such as coronary bypass surgery before securing universal coverage for high-priority services such as skilled birth attendance and services for easily preventable or treatable fatal childhood diseases. Services of the latter kind include oral rehydration therapy for children with diarrhea and antibiotics for children with pneumonia. The article explains why such trade-offs are unfair and unacceptable even if political considerations may push in the opposite direction.
authors.affiliation: Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
authors.forename: Ole Frithjof
authors.initials: OF
authors.lastname: Norheim
mesh_terms: D002648:Child; D003906:Developing Countries; D015276:Health Care Rationing; D000069576:Health Equity; D006291:Health Policy; D006292:Health Priorities; D006801:Humans; D007182:Income; D009014:Morals; D019472:Universal Health Insurance / Q000941:ethics*
keywords: Equity; Ethics; Health Policy; Rationing; Universal Healthcare