title: Addiction, Autonomy, and Informed Consent: On and Off the Garden Path.
abstract: Several ethicists have argued that research trials and treatment programs that involve the provision of drugs to addicts are prima facie unethical, because addicts can't refuse the offer of drugs and therefore can't give informed consent to participation. In response, several people have pointed out that addiction does not cause a compulsion to use drugs. However, since we know that addiction impairs autonomy, this response is inadequate. In this paper, I advance a stronger defense of the capacity of addicts to participate in the programs envisaged. I argue that it is only in certain circumstances that addicts find themselves choosing in ways that conflict with their genuine preferences. Research and treatment programs have none of the features that characterize choices in these autonomy-undermining circumstances, and there is therefore no reason to think that addicts lack the capacity to give informed consent to these programs.
authors.affiliation: Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia neil.levy@mq.edu.au.
authors.forename: Neil
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Levy
mesh_terms: D002755:Choice Behavior; D026689:Ethical Analysis; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent / Q000941:ethics*; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D019966:Substance-Related Disorders / Q000523:psychology*
keywords: addiction; capacity; informed consent; research ethics