title: Adding Qualitative and Mixed Methods Research to Health Intervention Studies: Interacting With Differences.
abstract: The purpose of this article is to explain how to improve intervention designs, such as randomized controlled trials (RCTs), in health science research using a process philosophy and theory known as dialectical pluralism (DP). DP views reality as plural and uses dialectical, dialogical, and hermeneutical approaches to knowledge construction. Using DP and its "both/and" logic, and its attempt to produce new creative syntheses, researchers on heterogeneous teams can better dialogue with qualitative and mixed methods approaches, concepts, paradigms, methodologies, and methods to improve their intervention research studies. The concept of reflexivity is utilized but is expanded when it is a component of DP. Examples of strategies for identifying, inviting, and creating divergence and integrative strategies for producing strong mixed methods intervention studies are provided and illustrated using real-life examples.
authors.affiliation: University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama, USA bjohnson@southalabama.edu.
authors.forename: R Burke
authors.initials: RB
authors.lastname: Johnson
authors.affiliation: University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
authors.forename: Judith
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Schoonenboom
mesh_terms: D003625:Data Collection / Q000379:methods; D003657:Decision Making; D004282:Documentation; D006801:Humans; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D036301:Qualitative Research; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / Q000379:methods; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012107:Research Design
keywords: North America; North Americans; United States of America; epistemology; methodology; qualitative; research design