title: Bypass Surgery for the Treatment of Dolichoectatic Basilar Trunk Aneurysms: A Work in Progress.
abstract: The treatment of dolichoectatic basilar trunk aneurysms has been ineffectual or morbid due to nonsaccular morphology, deep location, and involvement of brainstem perforators. Treatment with bypass surgery has been advocated to eliminate malignant hemodynamics and to stabilize aneurysm growth.
  
  
  
  To validate that flow alteration with bypass and parent artery occlusion favorably impacts aneurysm progression.
  
  
  
  Surgical management evolved in 3 phases, each with different hemodynamic alterations.
  
  
  
  During a 17-year period, 37 patients with dolichoectatic basilar trunk aneurysms were retrospectively identified, of whom 21 patients were observed, 12 treated immediately, and 4 selected for treatment after clinical progression. In phase 1, flow reversal was overly thrombogenic, despite heparin (N = 5, final mortality, 100%). In phase 2, flow reduction with intracranial-to-intracranial bypass was safer than flow reversal, but did not prevent progressive aneurysm enlargement (N = 3, final mortality 67%). In phase 3, distal clip occlusion of the basilar trunk aneurysm preserved anterograde flow in the aneurysm without rupture, but reduced flow threatened perforator patency, despite treatment with clopidogrel (N = 8, final mortality 62%).
  
  
  
  Shifting treatment strategy for dolichoectatic basilar trunk aneurysms improved surgical (80% to 50%) and final mortalities (100% to 62%), with stabilization of aneurysms in the phase 3 survivors. Good outcomes are determined by perforator preservation and mitigating aneurysm thrombosis. Occlusion techniques with increased distal run-off seem to benefit perforators. The treatment of dolichoectatic basilar trunk aneurysms can advance through concentrated management in dedicated centers, concerted efforts to study morphology and hemodynamics with computational methods, and widespread collection of registry data.
  
  
  
  4D PC-MRI, time-resolved phase-contrast MRIAICA, anterior inferior cerebellar arteryCE-MRA, high-resolution contrast-enhanced MR angiographyEC-IC, extracranial-to-intracranial bypassMCA, middle cerebral arteryMR, magnetic resonancemRS, modified Rankin ScalePCA, posterior cerebral arteryPICA, posterior inferior cerebellar arterySCA, superior cerebellar arterySTA, superficial temporal arteryVA, vertebral artery.
authors.affiliation: Departments of *Neurological Surgery, ‡Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, and §Interventional Neuroradiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
authors.forename: Michael T
authors.initials: MT
authors.lastname: Lawton
authors.forename: Adib A
authors.initials: AA
authors.lastname: Abla
authors.forename: W Caleb
authors.initials: WC
authors.lastname: Rutledge
authors.forename: Arnau
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Benet
authors.forename: Zsolt
authors.initials: Z
authors.lastname: Zador
authors.forename: Vitaliy L
authors.initials: VL
authors.lastname: Rayz
authors.forename: David
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Saloner
authors.forename: Van V
authors.initials: VV
authors.lastname: Halbach
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D002532:Intracranial Aneurysm / Q000601:surgery*; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008297:Male; D008866:Microsurgery / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods; D008875:Middle Aged; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D013525:Surgical Instruments; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014656:Vascular Surgical Procedures / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods*; D014711:Vertebral Artery / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*