title: Comparison of ventilatory efficacy and airway dynamics between ProSeal laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube in adult patients during general anesthesia.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Studies have demonstrated minimal hemodynamic variation and postoperative complications with ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) compared to endotracheal tube (ETT). Hence, a study was conducted to compare the ventilatory parameters and airway dynamics required to maintain normocarbia and stable hemodynamics with PLMA and ETT.
  
  
  METHODS
  A prospective, randomized, single blinded study was conducted on 60 patients aged 20-40 years of American society of anesthesiologists class I and II, divided into Group PLMA and Group ETT. Standard anesthesia protocol was instituted. Group PLMA received PLMA sizes as per manufacturer's recommendations and group ETT received appropriate sized cuffed ETT. Patients were initially ventilated at 14 bpm, I:E ratio 1:2, tidal volume (Vt) 6 ml/kg and later adjusted to maintain end tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO2) between 35 and 40 mmHg. Peak airway pressure (Ppeak), compliance (Compl.), Vt, airway resistance (Raw), hemodynamic parameters, oxygen saturation (SpO2) and EtCO2 were recorded throughout surgery. Postoperative complications if any, were noted.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Demographic parameters, Raw, EtCO2, SpO2 were comparable between groups. Ppeak was lower and Vt needed to maintain EtCO2 of 35-40 mmHg was lesser in Group PLMA. Compl was low for 5 min after insertion of PLMA. Heart rate was significantly reduced at 1 min post insertion; blood pressures were significantly lower upto 2 min after insertion and post removal in group PLMA. Incidence of cough was significantly lower in group PLMA.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  ProSeal laryngeal mask airway maintains adequate ventilation at lower Vts and minimal peak pressures, has lesser hemodynamic variations and lower incidence of postoperative cough compared to ETT.
authors.affiliation: Department of Anaesthesiology, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
authors.forename: Sudheesh
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Kannan
authors.affiliation: Department of Anaesthesiology, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
authors.forename: S S
authors.initials: SS
authors.lastname: Harsoor
authors.affiliation: Department of Anaesthesiology, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Sowmiya
authors.affiliation: Department of Anaesthesiology, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
authors.forename: S S
authors.initials: SS
authors.lastname: Nethra
authors.affiliation: Department of Anaesthesiology, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: DevikaRani
authors.affiliation: Department of Anaesthesiology, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Sathesha
keywords: Airway dynamics; ProSeal laryngeal mask airway; endotracheal tube; peak airway pressure; positive pressure ventilation; ventilatory parameters