title: Impact of scanning parameters and breathing patterns on image quality and accuracy of tumor motion reconstruction in 4D CBCT: a phantom study.
abstract: Four-dimensional, cone-beam CT (4D CBCT) substantially reduces respiration-induced motion blurring artifacts in three-dimension (3D) CBCT. However, the image quality of 4D CBCT is significantly degraded which may affect its accuracy in localizing a mobile tumor for high-precision, image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT). The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of scanning parameters hereinafter collectively referred to as scanning sequence) and breathing patterns on the image quality and the accuracy of computed tumor trajectory for a commercial 4D CBCT system, in preparation for its clinical implementation. We simulated a series of periodic and aperiodic sinusoidal breathing patterns with a respiratory motion phantom. The aperiodic pattern was created by varying the period or amplitude of individual sinusoidal breathing cycles. 4D CBCT scans of the phantom were acquired with a manufacturer-supplied scanning sequence (4D-S-slow) and two in-house modified scanning sequences (4D-M-slow and 4D-M-fast). While 4D-S-slow used small field of view (FOV), partial rotation (200°), and no imaging filter, 4D-M-slow and 4D-M-fast used medium FOV, full rotation, and the F1 filter. The scanning speed was doubled in 4D-M-fast (100°/min gantry rotation). The image quality of the 4D CBCT scans was evaluated using contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and motion blurring ratio (MBR). The trajectory of the moving target was reconstructed by registering each phase of the 4D CBCT with a reference CT. The root-mean-squared-error (RMSE) analysis was used to quantify its accuracy. Significant decrease in CNR and SNR from 3D CBCT to 4D CBCT was observed. The 4D-S-slow and 4D-M-fast scans had comparable image quality, while the 4D-M-slow scans had better performance due to doubled projections. Both CNR and SNR decreased slightly as the breathing period increased, while no dependence on the amplitude was observed. The difference of both CNR and SNR between periodic and aperiodic breathing patterns was insignificant (p > 0.48). At end-exhale phases, the motion blurring was negligible for both periodic and aperiodic breathing patterns; at mid-inhale phase, the motion blurring increased as the period, the amplitude or the amount of cycle-to-cycle variation on amplitude increased. Overall, the accuracy of localizing the moving target in 4D CBCT was within 2 mm under all studied cases. No difference in the RMSEs was noticed among the three scanning sequences. The 4D-M-fast scans, free of volume truncation artifacts, exhibited comparable image quality and accuracy in tumor motion reconstruction as the 4D-S-slow scans with reduced imaging dose (0.60 cGy vs. 0.99 cGy) due to the use of faster gantry rotation and the F1 filter, suggesting its suitability for clinical use.
authors.affiliation: University of Florida and University of Florida, College of Medicine. soyounglee@ufl.edu.
authors.forename: Soyoung
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Lee
authors.forename: Guanghua
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Yan
authors.forename: Bo
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Lu
authors.forename: Darren
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Kahler
authors.forename: Jonathan G
authors.initials: JG
authors.lastname: Li
authors.forename: Samat S
authors.initials: SS
authors.lastname: Sanjiv
mesh_terms: D056973:Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography / Q000379:methods* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006801:Humans; D009068:Movement; D009369:Neoplasms / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000532:radiotherapy; D019047:Phantoms, Imaging; D011857:Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods*; D011880:Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D061089:Radiotherapy, Image-Guided; D012119:Respiration; D059629:Signal-To-Noise Ratio