title: [Five years of peer reviewing in the Quality Medicine Initiative].
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Peer review focuses on critical self-reflection, especially of physicians in direct contact and dialogue with other disciplines and professional groups. The main purpose of the peer review is the principle of self-determination, the intention to learn from each other more effectively, and a commitment to quality improvement. During the past five years the Quality in Medicine Initiative (IQM) has successfully promotes peer reviewing in German-speaking areas. The aim of this study is to investigate all records of IQM peer reviews and to outline the results in the course of development. The major focuses include medical aspects for improvement, information concerning organizational processes and the satisfaction of the visited hospitals.
  
  
  METHODS
  A systematic descriptive analysis of all records as well as feedback sheets was conducted between 2010 and 2014.
  
  
  RESULTS
  294 of 304 planned peer reviews were considered, involving among different hospital owners and different clinical conditions. The identified potential for improvement of the peer team was higher than that of the physicians of the hospitals visited. The assessment of the medical review criteria illustrates the following different trends: a positive development occurred concerning the appropriate and timely diagnostic and treatment; a clear potential for improvement could be established concerning a complete and conclusive documentation. Regarding the clinical conditions, anomalies were identified which are important for all IQM hospitals. As regards sustainability, first results from so-called re-reviews were available and provided important information pointing in the direction of structure and process improvement. The satisfaction of the visited physicians increased continuously within these five years.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  In the light of all data records and satisfaction sheets, the IQM peer review has become well-established over the last five years. Possible reasons are a well-defined framework, clear structures and different kinds of support. The success of the cooperation of the German Medical Association and IQM is illustrated by the development of the curriculum peer review. Re-reviews provide impulses for sustainability. At any rate, there is a need for scientific evaluation of the peer review method in order to generate evidence for this important tool of quality improvement.
authors.affiliation: Zentralbereich Qualitäts- und Medizinisches Risikomanagement, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der Technischen Universität Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland. Electronic address: maria.eberlein-gonska@uniklinikum-dresden.de.
authors.forename: Maria
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Eberlein-Gonska
authors.affiliation: Initiative Qualitätsmedizin, Geschäftsstelle.
authors.forename: Anita
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Budic
authors.affiliation: Initiative Qualitätsmedizin, Geschäftsstelle.
authors.forename: Claudia
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Winklmair
authors.affiliation: Zentralbereich Qualitäts- und Medizinisches Risikomanagement, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der Technischen Universität Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland; Zentrum für Evidenzbasierte Gesundheitsversorgung, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der Technischen Universität Dresden, Dresden, Deutschland.
authors.forename: Thomas
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Petzold
mesh_terms: D003299:Cooperative Behavior; D005544:Forecasting; D005858:Germany; D006753:Hospital Records; D006801:Humans; D033183:Interdisciplinary Communication; D009313:National Health Programs / Q000458:organization & administration* / Q000639:trends*; D010380:Peer Review / Q000379:methods* / Q000639:trends*; D058996:Quality Improvement / Q000458:organization & administration / Q000639:trends; D011787:Quality of Health Care / Q000458:organization & administration* / Q000639:trends*
keywords: Curriculum Peer Review; Initiative Qualitätsmedizin; Peer Review; Peer review; Qualitätsverbesserung; Routinedaten; Transparenz; curriculum peer review; initiative quality medicine; quality improvement; routine data; transparency