title: Assessing the Moral Coherence and Moral Robustness of Social Systems: Proof of Concept for a Graphical Models Approach.
abstract: This paper presents a proof of concept for a graphical models approach to assessing the moral coherence and moral robustness of systems of social interactions. "Moral coherence" refers to the degree to which the rights and duties of agents within a system are effectively respected when agents in the system comply with the rights and duties that are recognized as in force for the relevant context of interaction. "Moral robustness" refers to the degree to which a system of social interaction is configured to ensure that the interests of agents are effectively respected even in the face of noncompliance. Using the case of conscientious objection of pharmacists to filling prescriptions for emergency contraception as an example, we illustrate how a graphical models approach can help stakeholders identify structural weaknesses in systems of social interaction and evaluate the relative merits of alternate organizational structures. By illustrating the merits of a graphical models approach we hope to spur further developments in this area.
authors.affiliation: Department of Engineering and Public Policy, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
authors.forename: Frauke
authors.identifier: 0000-0002-4477-1558
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Hoss
authors.affiliation: Department of Philosophy, Carnegie Mellon University, 5000 Forbes Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA. ajlondon@andrew.cmu.edu.
authors.forename: Alex John
authors.initials: AJ
authors.lastname: London
mesh_terms: D006806:Human Rights; D006801:Humans; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D009014:Morals; D012931:Social Environment; D012941:Social Responsibility
keywords: Compliance; Ethics; Moral coherence; Moral robustness; Organizational structure; Visualization