title: Olfaction variation in mouse husbandry and its implications for refinement and standardization: UK survey of animal scents.
abstract: Olfaction plays a crucial role in mouse communication, providing information about genetic identity, physiological status of conspecifics and alerting mice to potential predators. Scents of animal origin can trigger physiological and behavioural responses that could affect experimental responses and impact positively or negatively on mouse welfare. Additionally, differing olfactory profiles could help explain variation in results between laboratories. A survey was sent to animal research units in the UK to investigate potential transfer of scents of animal origin during routine husbandry procedures, and responses were obtained from animal care workers and researchers using mice in 51 institutions. The results reveal great diversity between animal units regarding the relevant husbandry routines covered. Most [71%] reported housing non-breeding male and female mice in the same room, with 76% reporting that hands were not washed and gloves not changed between handling male and female mice. The most commonly reported species housed in the same facility as mice was the rat (91%), and 41% of respondents were aware that scents from rats could affect mice. Changing of gloves between handling mice and other species was reported by 79% of respondents. Depending on the aspect considered, between 18 and 33% of respondents believed human and non-human animal odours would strongly affect mouse physiology, behaviour or standardization, while approximately 32-54% believed these effects would be weak. This indicates uncertainty regarding the significance of these factors. Understanding and controlling these practices could reduce unwanted variability in experimental results and maximize welfare.
authors.affiliation: Animal Welfare Science and Ethics Group, The Royal Veterinary College, London, UK Named Veterinary Surgeons Department, The Royal Veterinary College, London, UK nlopez@rvc.ac.uk.
authors.forename: Noelia
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: López-Salesansky
authors.affiliation: Department of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, The Royal Veterinary College, London, UK.
authors.forename: Nur H
authors.initials: NH
authors.lastname: Mazlan
authors.affiliation: Named Veterinary Surgeons Department, The Royal Veterinary College, London, UK.
authors.forename: Lucy E
authors.initials: LE
authors.lastname: Whitfield
authors.affiliation: Department of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, The Royal Veterinary College, London, UK.
authors.forename: Dominic J
authors.initials: DJ
authors.lastname: Wells
authors.affiliation: Animal Welfare Science and Ethics Group, The Royal Veterinary College, London, UK.
authors.forename: Charlotte C
authors.initials: CC
authors.lastname: Burn
mesh_terms: D000822:Animal Husbandry / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards; D000818:Animals; D005260:Female; D008297:Male; D051379:Mice / Q000502:physiology*; D009812:Odorants / Q000032:analysis*; D012903:Smell; D006113:United Kingdom
keywords: husbandry; mice; olfaction; refinement; survey