title: Assessment Following Distal Radius Fractures: A Comparison of 4 Scoring Systems, Visual Numerical Scales, and Objective Measurements.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To compare 4 recognized upper-limb scoring systems that are regularly used to assess wrist function after injury.
  
  
  METHODS
  We reviewed 116 patients 6 months after volar locking plate fixation for distal radius fractures. Two purely subjective and 2 composite scoring systems composed of both subjective and objective components were compared along with visual numerical scores for pain and function and objective measures of function. Each score was standardized into a scale from 0 to 100.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The distribution of the standardized total scores was statistically significantly different and indicated marked variability between scoring systems and therefore the information provided. Overall, the subjective scoring systems correlated well with each other and with both visual numerical scores for pain and function. However, the composite scores and objective measures of function correlated poorly with the subjective scores including the visual numerical scores.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Results from wrist scoring systems should be interpreted with caution. It is important to ensure that the component parts of each score are taken into consideration separately because total scores may be misleading.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Composite scores may be outdated and should be avoided.
authors.affiliation: Trauma and Orthopaedics Unit, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
authors.forename: Scott L
authors.initials: SL
authors.lastname: Barker
authors.affiliation: Trauma and Orthopaedics Unit, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, United Kingdom. Electronic address: haroon.rehman.06@aberdeen.ac.uk.
authors.forename: Haroon
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Rehman
authors.affiliation: Trauma and Orthopaedics Unit, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
authors.forename: Anna L
authors.initials: AL
authors.lastname: McCullough
authors.affiliation: Trauma and Orthopaedics Unit, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
authors.forename: Shona
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Fielding
authors.affiliation: Trauma and Orthopaedics Unit, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.
authors.forename: Alan J
authors.initials: AJ
authors.lastname: Johnstone
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001860:Bone Plates; D005260:Female; D005593:Fracture Fixation, Internal; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010147:Pain Measurement; D000071066:Patient Reported Outcome Measures; D011885:Radius Fractures / Q000601:surgery*; D020127:Recovery of Function; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D016896:Treatment Outcome
keywords: Wrist; fixation; fracture; outcome score; volar plate