title: Learning, Memory, and Executive Function in New MDMA Users: A 2-Year Follow-Up Study.
abstract: 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) is associated with changes in neurocognitive performance. Recent studies in laboratory animals have provided additional support for the neurodegeneration hypothesis. However, results from animal research need to be applied to humans with caution. Moreover, several of the studies that examine MDMA users suffer from methodological shortcomings. Therefore, a prospective cohort study was designed in order to overcome these previous methodological shortcomings and to assess the relationship between the continuing use of MDMA and cognitive performance in incipient MDMA users. It was hypothesized that, depending on the amount of MDMA taken, the continued use of MDMA over a 2-year period would lead to further decreases in cognitive performance, especially in visual paired association learning tasks. Ninety-six subjects were assessed, at the second follow-up assessment: 31 of these were non-users, 55 moderate-users, and 10 heavy-users. Separate repeated measures analyses of variance were conducted for each cognitive domain, including attention and information processing speed, episodic memory, and executive functioning. Furthermore, possible confounders including age, general intelligence, cannabis use, alcohol use, use of other concomitant substances, recent medical treatment, participation in sports, level of nutrition, sleep patterns, and subjective well-being were assessed. The Repeated measures analysis of variance (rANOVA) revealed that a marginally significant change in immediate and delayed recall test performances of visual paired associates learning had taken place within the follow-up period of 2 years. No further deterioration in continuing MDMA-users was observed in the second follow-up period. No significant differences with the other neuropsychological tests were noted. It seems that MDMA use can impair visual paired associates learning in new users. However, the groups differed in their use of concomitant use of illicit drugs. Therefore, performance differences between the groups cannot completely ascribed to the use of MDMA.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne Cologne, Germany.
authors.forename: Daniel
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Wagner
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne Cologne, Germany.
authors.forename: Simon
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Tkotz
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne Cologne, Germany.
authors.forename: Philip
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Koester
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne Cologne, Germany.
authors.forename: Benjamin
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Becker
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne Cologne, Germany.
authors.forename: Euphrosyne
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Gouzoulis-Mayfrank
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Cologne Cologne, Germany.
authors.forename: Joerg
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Daumann
keywords: MDMA; cognition; verbal memory