title: Identifying Centres of Plant Biodiversity in South Australia.
abstract: We aimed to identify regional centres of plant biodiversity in South Australia, a sub-continental land area of 983,482 km2, by mapping a suite of metrics. Broad-brush conservation issues associated with the centres were mapped, specifically climate sensitivity, exposure to habitat fragmentation, introduced species and altered fire regimes. We compiled 727,417 plant species records from plot-based field surveys and herbarium records and mapped the following: species richness (all species; South Australian endemics; conservation-dependent species; introduced species); georeferenced weighted endemism, phylogenetic diversity, georeferenced phylogenetic endemism; and measures of beta diversity at local and state-wide scales. Associated conservation issues mapped were: climate sensitivity measured via ordination and non-linear modelling; habitat fragmentation represented by the proportion of remnant vegetation within a moving window; fire prone landscapes assessed using fire history records; invasive species assessed through diversity metrics, species distribution and literature. Compared to plots, herbarium data had higher spatial and taxonomic coverage but records were more biased towards major transport corridors. Beta diversity was influenced by sampling intensity and scale of comparison. We identified six centres of high plant biodiversity for South Australia: Western Kangaroo Island; Southern Mount Lofty Ranges; Anangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara lands; Southern Flinders Ranges; Southern Eyre Peninsula; Lower South East. Species composition in the arid-mediterranean ecotone was the most climate sensitive. Fragmentation mapping highlighted the dichotomy between extensive land-use and high remnancy in the north and intensive land-use and low remnancy in the south. Invasive species were most species rich in agricultural areas close to population centres. Fire mapping revealed large variation in frequency across the state. Biodiversity scores were not always congruent between metrics or datasets, notably for categorical endemism to South Australia versus georeferenced weighted endemism, justifying diverse approaches and cautious interpretation. The study could be extended to high resolution assessments of biodiversity centres and cost:benefit analysis for interventions.
authors.affiliation: Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network, Adelaide-node, School of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia.
authors.forename: Greg R
authors.initials: GR
authors.lastname: Guerin
authors.affiliation: Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network, Adelaide-node, School of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia.|Science, Monitoring and Knowledge, Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
authors.forename: Ed
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Biffin
authors.affiliation: Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network, Adelaide-node, School of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia.
authors.forename: Zdravko
authors.initials: Z
authors.lastname: Baruch
authors.affiliation: Terrestrial Ecosystem Research Network, Adelaide-node, School of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia.|Science, Monitoring and Knowledge, Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
authors.forename: Andrew J
authors.initials: AJ
authors.lastname: Lowe
mesh_terms: D044822:Biodiversity; D002980:Climate; D003247:Conservation of Natural Resources; D058865:Introduced Species; D010802:Phylogeny; D010944:Plants / Q000145:classification* / Q000378:metabolism; D013021:South Australia