title: Comparison of foam-based and spring-loaded dry EEG electrodes with wet electrodes in resting and moving conditions.
abstract: The introduction of dry electrodes for EEG measurements has opened up possibilities of recording EEG outside of standard clinical environments by reducing required preparation and maintenance. However, the signal quality of dry electrodes in comparison with wet electrodes has not yet been evaluated under activities of daily life (ADL) or high motion tasks. In this study, we compared the performances of foam-based and spring-loaded dry electrodes with wet electrodes under three different task conditions: resting state, walking, and cycling. Our analysis showed that signals obtained by the 2 types of dry electrodes and obtained by wet electrodes displayed high correlation for all conditions, while being prone to similar environmental and electrode-based artifacts. Overall, our results suggest that dry electrodes have a similar signal quality in comparison to wet electrodes during motion and may be more practical for use in mobile and real-time motion applications due to their convenience. In addition, we conclude that as with wet electrodes, post-processing can mitigate motion artifacts in ambulatory EEG acquisition.
authors.forename: Arnold
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Yeung
authors.forename: Harinath
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Garudadri
authors.forename: Carolyn
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Van Toen
authors.forename: Patrick
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Mercier
authors.forename: Ozgur
authors.initials: O
authors.lastname: Balkan
authors.forename: Scott
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Makeig
authors.forename: Naznin
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Virji-Babul
mesh_terms: D016477:Artifacts; D004566:Electrodes; D004569:Electroencephalography / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods; D004867:Equipment Design; D006801:Humans; D018670:Monitoring, Ambulatory / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods; D009068:Movement; D012146:Rest