title: Evolutionary biology and the question of teleology.
abstract: Teleology-what Aristotle called "final cause"-is trying to understand things in terms of the future, as when we ask about the plates on the back of the dinosaur, stegosaurus, and suggest that they might sometime be used to control the internal temperature of the brute. Recently the philosopher Thomas Nagel has argued for a wholesale embrace of teleological thinking in the sciences, particularly the life sciences. I argue that Nagel's thinking is shoddy and ill-informed, but that in some sense biologists do (with reason) seem drawn to teleological understanding, and so the correct response is not outright rejection of the very idea but a more informed and sympathetic approach to those aspects of nature that seem to call for final cause thinking.
authors.affiliation: Program in the History and Philosophy of Science, Florida State University, FL, 32306, USA. Electronic address: mruse@fsu.edu.
authors.forename: Michael
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Ruse
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D005075:Biological Evolution; D049672:History, 19th Century; D049673:History, 20th Century; D049674:History, 21st Century; D049690:History, Ancient; D006801:Humans; D010684:Philosophy / Q000266:history; D012641:Selection, Genetic
keywords: Arms race; Charles Darwin; Final cause; Natural selection; Teleology; Thomas Nagel