title: Clinician-scientist MB/PhD training in the UK: a nationwide survey of medical school policy.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  This study surveyed all UK medical schools regarding their Bachelor of Medicine (MB), Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) (MB/PhD) training policy in order to map the current training landscape and to provide evidence for further research and policy development.
  
  
  METHODS
  Deans of all UK medical schools registered with the Medical Schools Council were invited to participate in this survey electronically.
  The number of medical schools that operate institutional MB/PhD programmes or permit self-directed student PhD intercalation.
  Medical school recruitment procedures and attitudes to policy guidance.
  
  
  RESULTS
  27 of 33 (81%) registered UK medical schools responded. Four (14%) offer an institutional MB/PhD programme. However, of those without institutional programmes, 17 (73%) permit study interruption and PhD intercalation: two do not (one of whom had discontinued their programme in 2013), three were unsure and one failed to answer the question. Regarding student eligibility, respondents cited high academic achievement in medical studies and a bachelor's or master's degree. Of the Medical schools without institutional MB/PhD programmes, 5 (21%) have intentions to establish a programme, 8 (34%) do not and 3 were unsure, seven did not answer. 19 medical schools (70%) considered national guidelines are needed for future MB/PhD programme development.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  We report the first national survey of MB/PhD training in the UK. Four medical schools have operational institutional MB/PhD programmes, with a further five intending to establish one. Most medical schools permit study interruption and PhD intercalation. The total number MB/PhD students yet to graduate from medical school could exceed 150, with 30 graduating per year. A majority of medical school respondents to this survey believe national guidelines are required for MB/PhD programme development and implementation. Further research should focus on the MB/PhD student experience. Discussion regarding local and national MB/PhD policies between medical schools and academic stakeholders are needed.
authors.affiliation: Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK Faculty of Medicine, St George's University of London, London, UK.
authors.forename: Ashton
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Barnett-Vanes
authors.affiliation: Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
authors.forename: Guiyi
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Ho
authors.affiliation: Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
authors.forename: Timothy M
authors.initials: TM
authors.lastname: Cox
mesh_terms: D004503:Education, Medical, Graduate / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D004504:Education, Medical, Undergraduate / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D008503:Medical Staff / Q000193:education*; D012577:Schools, Medical / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D006113:United Kingdom
keywords: AUDIT; BASIC SCIENCES; EDUCATION & TRAINING (see Medical Education & Training); MEDICAL EDUCATION & TRAINING