title: Medicaid Contradictions: Adding, Subtracting, and Redeterminations in Illinois.
abstract: States are required to conduct annual Medicaid redeterminations. How these redeterminations are undertaken is crucial to determining the nature of Medicaid coverage. There can be wide variations in the proportion of clients disenrolled, with potentially large numbers of people disenrolled each year. This case study of Illinois Medicaid shows how, as the Affordable Care Act added people, redeterminations were taking people off the rolls-about 25 percent of all Medicaid clients were disenrolled in one year. Many of these people were no longer eligible, but it appears that a larger number were in fact eligible but simply failed to comply with administrative requirements in a timely way. Balancing between the two imperatives of program integrity and continuity of care is a difficult act for Medicaid programs. The Illinois experience also illustrates impacts on information technology and outsourcing of eligibility functions, not to mention budget considerations.
authors.affiliation: Health Policy Consultant.
authors.forename: Michael
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Koetting
mesh_terms: D004608:Eligibility Determination / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006801:Humans; D007087:Illinois; D019458:Insurance Coverage / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D008484:Medicaid / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000458:organization & administration*; D019982:Organizational Case Studies; D058991:Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; D014481:United States
keywords: Medicaid; churn; eligibility; privatization; redetermination