title: Coronectomy; Good or Bad?
abstract: The removal of mandibular third molars can be complicated by injury to the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN). Coronectomy retains the tooth root; this method has been found to be preferable to extraction in the context of mandibular third molars. A failed coronectomy may cause mobilization of these roots, thereby requiring a subsequent extraction. Having undergone a previous coronectomy, extraction is then safer as the roots usually migrate away from the IAN. Computed tomography is more accurate than radiography when imaging mandibular third molars pre-operatively owing to its three-dimensional nature. Longer studies need to be conducted to evaluate the long term benefits of coronectomy. CPD/CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The removal of mandibular third molars can be complicated by the presence of the close lying inferior alveolar nerve. Coronectomy can be useful in this setting and therefore it is important to be aware of the pros and cons of this technique.
authors.forename: Humera
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Sarwar
authors.forename: Sameer
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Mahmood-Rao
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D008340:Mandibular Nerve / Q000473:pathology; D008964:Molar, Third / Q000294:innervation / Q000601:surgery*; D019228:Tooth Crown / Q000601:surgery*; D014081:Tooth Extraction / Q000009:adverse effects; D014085:Tooth Migration / Q000209:etiology; D014092:Tooth Root / Q000294:innervation / Q000473:pathology; D061221:Trigeminal Nerve Injuries / Q000517:prevention & control