title: Testing hypotheses in macroevolution.
abstract: Experimental manipulation of microevolution (changes in frequency of heritable traits in populations) has shed much light on evolutionary processes. But many evolutionary processes occur on scales that are not amenable to experimental manipulation. Indeed, one of the reasons that macroevolution (changes in biodiversity over time, space and lineages) has sometimes been a controversial topic is that processes underlying the generation of biological diversity generally operate at scales that are not open to direct observation or manipulation. Macroevolutionary hypotheses can be tested by using them to generate predictions then asking whether observations from the biological world match those predictions. Each study that identifies significant correlations between evolutionary events, processes or outcomes can generate new predictions that can be further tested with different datasets, allowing a cumulative process that may narrow down on plausible explanations, or lead to rejection of other explanations as inconsistent or unsupported. A similar approach can be taken even for unique events, for example by comparing patterns in different regions, lineages, or time periods. I will illustrate the promise and pitfalls of these approaches using a range of examples, and discuss the problems of inferring causality from significant evolutionary associations.
authors.affiliation: Centre for Macroevolution and Macroecology, Research School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia. Electronic address: Lindell.Bromham@anu.edu.au.
authors.forename: Lindell
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Bromham
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D005075:Biological Evolution; D001686:Biological Phenomena; D025061:Dinosaurs; D053476:Extinction, Biological; D005580:Fossils; D018521:Plant Physiological Phenomena; D010944:Plants
keywords: Cambrian explosion; Comparative method; Dinosaur extinction; Parasitic plants; Rockfish; Salt tolerance