title: A second look at the colors of the dinosaurs.
abstract: In earlier work, I predicted that we would probably not be able to determine the colors of the dinosaurs. I lost this epistemic bet against science in dramatic fashion when scientists discovered that it is possible to draw inferences about dinosaur coloration based on the microstructure of fossil feathers (Vinther et al., 2008). This paper is an exercise in philosophical error analysis. I examine this episode with two questions in mind. First, does this case lend any support to epistemic optimism about historical science? Second, under what conditions is it rational to make predictions about what questions scientists will or will not be able answer? In reply to the first question, I argue that the recent work on the colors of the dinosaurs matters less to the debate about the epistemology of historical science than it might seem. In reply to the second question, I argue that it is difficult to specify a policy that would rule out the failed bet without also being too conservative.
authors.affiliation: Department of Philosophy and Goodwin-Niering Center for the Environment, Connecticut College, 270 Mohegan Avenue, New London, CT 06320, USA. Electronic address: derek.turner@conncoll.edu.
authors.forename: Derek D
authors.initials: DD
authors.lastname: Turner
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D003116:Color; D025061:Dinosaurs; D005241:Feathers / Q000033:anatomy & histology; D005580:Fossils; D049690:History, Ancient; D019359:Knowledge; D010163:Paleontology; D012106:Research / Q000639:trends
keywords: Fossils; Historical science; Paleontology; Underdetermination