title: The challenges of choosing and explaining a phenomenon in epidemiological research on the "Hispanic Paradox".
abstract: According to public health data, the US Hispanic population is far healthier than would be expected for a population with low socioeconomic status. Ever since Kyriakos Markides and Jeannine Coreil highlighted this in a seminal 1986 article, public health researchers have sought to explain the so-called "Hispanic paradox." Several candidate explanations have been offered over the years, but the debate goes on. This article offers a philosophical analysis that clarifies how two sets of obstacles make it particularly difficult to explain the Hispanic paradox. First, different research projects define the Hispanic paradox phenomenon in substantially different ways. Moreover, using Bas van Fraassen's pragmatic theory of explanation and Sean Valles's extension of it with the concept of "phenomenon choice," it also becomes clear that there are also multiple ways of explaining each individual definition of the phenomenon. A second set of philosophical and methodological challenges arises during any attempt to study "Hispanic" phenomena, with one key challenge being that the "Hispanic" panethnic concept was intentionally made vague as it was developed and popularized during the 1960s-1970s. After comparing this case with similar cases in the philosophical literature, the article concludes with observations on what makes this problem unique, particularly its ethical features.
authors.affiliation: Lyman Briggs College and Department of Philosophy, Michigan State University, Holmes Hall, 919 E. Shaw Lane, Room E35, East Lansing, MI, 48825, USA. valles@msu.edu.
authors.forename: Sean A
authors.initials: SA
authors.lastname: Valles
mesh_terms: D006304:Health Status; D006630:Hispanic or Latino; D006801:Humans; D009014:Morals; D011634:Public Health
keywords: Explanation; Health disparities; Hispanic paradox; Philosophy of epidemiology; Philosophy of medicine; Public health ethics