title: A comparison of stress in cracked fibrous tissue specimens with varied crack location, loading, and orientation using finite element analysis.
abstract: Cracks in fibrous soft tissue, such as intervertebral disc annulus fibrosus and knee meniscus, cause pain and compromise joint mechanics. A crack concentrates stress at its tip, making further failure and crack extension (fracture) more likely. Ex vivo mechanical testing is an important tool for studying the loading conditions required for crack extension, but prior work has shown that it is difficult to reproduce crack extension. Most prior work used edge crack specimens in uniaxial tension, with the crack 90° to the edge of the specimen. This configuration does not necessarily represent the loading conditions that cause in vivo crack extension. To find a potentially better choice for experiments aiming to reproduce crack extension, we used finite element analysis to compare, in factorial combination, (1) center crack vs. edge crack location, (2) biaxial vs. uniaxial loading, and (3) crack-fiber angles ranging from 0° to 90°. The simulated material was annulus fibrosus fibrocartilage with a single fiber family. We hypothesized that one of the simulated test cases would produce a stronger stress concentration than the commonly used uniaxially loaded 90° crack-fiber angle edge crack case. Stress concentrations were compared between cases in terms of fiber-parallel stress (representing risk of fiber rupture), fiber-perpendicular stress (representing risk of matrix rupture), and fiber shear stress (representing risk of fiber sliding). Fiber-perpendicular stress and fiber shear stress concentrations were greatest in edge crack specimens (of any crack-fiber angle) and center crack specimens with a 90° crack-fiber angle. However, unless the crack is parallel to the fiber direction, these stress components alone are insufficient to cause crack opening and extension. Fiber-parallel stress concentrations were greatest in center crack specimens with a 45° crack-fiber angle, either biaxially or uniaxially loaded. We therefore recommend that the 45° center crack case be tried in future experiments intended to study crack extension by fiber rupture.
authors.affiliation: University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
authors.forename: John M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Peloquin
authors.affiliation: University of Delaware, 150 Academy St, 161 Colburn Lab, Newark, DE 19716, USA. Electronic address: delliott@udel.edu.
authors.forename: Dawn M
authors.initials: DM
authors.lastname: Elliott
mesh_terms: D020342:Finite Element Analysis; D016013:Likelihood Functions; D008422:Materials Testing; D018570:Risk Assessment; D033081:Shear Strength; D013314:Stress, Mechanical; D016474:Weight-Bearing
keywords: Crack propagation; Fibrocartilage; Finite element analysis; Tensile testing