title: Factors Associated With Rates of False-Positive and False-Negative Results From Digital Mammography Screening: An Analysis of Registry Data.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Women screened with digital mammography may receive false-positive and false-negative results and subsequent imaging and biopsies. How these outcomes vary by age, time since the last screening, and individual risk factors is unclear.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To determine factors associated with false-positive and false-negative digital mammography results, additional imaging, and biopsies among a general population of women screened for breast cancer.
  
  
  METHODS
  Analysis of registry data.
  
  
  METHODS
  Participating facilities at 5 U.S. Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium breast imaging registries with linkages to pathology databases and tumor registries.
  
  
  METHODS
  405,191 women aged 40 to 89 years screened with digital mammography between 2003 and 2011. A total of 2963 were diagnosed with invasive cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ within 12 months of screening.
  
  
  METHODS
  Rates of false-positive and false-negative results and recommendations for additional imaging and biopsies from a single screening round; comparisons by age, time since the last screening, and risk factors.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Rates of false-positive results (121.2 per 1000 women [95% CI, 105.6 to 138.7]) and recommendations for additional imaging (124.9 per 1000 women [CI, 109.3 to 142.3]) were highest among women aged 40 to 49 years and decreased with increasing age. Rates of false-negative results (1.0 to 1.5 per 1000 women) and recommendations for biopsy (15.6 to 17.5 per 1000 women) did not differ greatly by age. Results did not differ by time since the last screening. False-positive rates were higher for women with risk factors, particularly family history of breast cancer; previous benign breast biopsy result; high breast density; and, for younger women, low body mass index.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Confounding by variation in patient-level characteristics and outcomes across registries and regions may have been present. Some factors, such as numbers of first- and second-degree relatives with breast cancer and diagnoses associated with previous benign biopsy results, were not examined.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  False-positive mammography results and additional imaging are common, particularly for younger women and those with risk factors, whereas biopsies occur less often. Rates of false-negative results are low.
  
  
  BACKGROUND
  Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and National Cancer Institute.
authors.forename: Heidi D
authors.initials: HD
authors.lastname: Nelson
authors.forename: Ellen S
authors.initials: ES
authors.lastname: O'Meara
authors.forename: Karla
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Kerlikowske
authors.forename: Steven
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Balch
authors.forename: Diana
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Miglioretti
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000367:Age Factors; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001706:Biopsy; D015992:Body Mass Index; D001940:Breast / Q000033:anatomy & histology; D000071060:Breast Density; D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000453:epidemiology; D055088:Early Detection of Cancer / Q000009:adverse effects* / Q000379:methods; D005188:False Negative Reactions; D005189:False Positive Reactions; D005260:Female; D020022:Genetic Predisposition to Disease; D006801:Humans; D042361:Mammary Glands, Human / Q000002:abnormalities; D008327:Mammography / Q000009:adverse effects* / Q000379:methods; D008403:Mass Screening / Q000009:adverse effects* / Q000379:methods; D008875:Middle Aged; D012042:Registries; D012307:Risk Factors; D013997:Time Factors; D014481:United States / Q000453:epidemiology