title: Unintentional perspective-taking calculates whether something is seen, but not how it is seen.
abstract: A long established distinction exists in developmental psychology between young children's ability to judge whether objects are seen by another, known as "level-1" perspective-taking, and judging how the other sees those objects, known as "level-2" perspective-taking (Flavell, Everett, Croft, & Flavell, 1981a; Flavell, Flavell, Green, & Wilcox, 1981b). Samson, Apperly, Braithwaite, Andrews, and Bodley Scott (2010) provided evidence that there are two routes available to adults for level-1 perspective-taking: one which is triggered relatively automatically and the other requiring cognitive control. We tested whether both these routes were available for adults' level-2 perspective-taking. Explicit judgements of both level-1 and level-2 perspectives were subject to egocentric interference, suggesting a need for cognitive control. Evidence of unintentional perspective-taking was limited to level-1 judgements.
authors.affiliation: University catholique de Louvain, Belgium; University of Birmingham, UK. Electronic address: adrsurtees@gmail.com.
authors.forename: Andrew
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Surtees
authors.affiliation: University catholique de Louvain, Belgium.
authors.forename: Dana
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Samson
authors.affiliation: University of Birmingham, UK.
authors.forename: Ian
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Apperly
mesh_terms: D003071:Cognition / Q000502:physiology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment / Q000502:physiology*; D008297:Male; D056345:Theory of Mind / Q000502:physiology*; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
keywords: Perspective-taking; Theory of mind; Visual perspective-taking