title: Do active design buildings change health behaviour and workplace perceptions?
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Occupying new, active design office buildings designed for health promotion and connectivity provides an opportunity to evaluate indoor environment effects on healthy behaviour, sedentariness and workplace perceptions.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To determine if moving to a health-promoting building changed workplace physical activity, sedentary behaviour, workplace perceptions and productivity.
  
  
  METHODS
  Participants from four locations at the University of Sydney, Australia, relocated into a new active design building. After consent, participants completed an online questionnaire 2 months before moving and 2 months after. Questions related to health behaviours (physical activity and sitting time), musculoskeletal issues, perceptions of the office environment, productivity and engagement.
  
  
  RESULTS
  There were 34 participants (60% aged 25-45, 78% female, 84% employed full-time); 21 participants provided complete data. Results showed that after the move participants spent less work time sitting (83-70%; P < 0.01) and more time standing (9-21%; P < 0.01), while walking time remained unchanged. Participants reported less low back pain (P < 0.01). Sixty per cent of participants in the new workplace were in an open-plan office, compared to 16% before moving. Participants perceived the new work environment as more stimulating, better lit and ventilated, but noisier and providing less storage. No difference was reported in daily physical activity, number of stairs climbed or productivity.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Moving to an active design building appeared to have physical health-promoting effects on workers, but workers' perceptions about the new work environment varied. These results will inform future studies in other new buildings.
authors.affiliation: Prevention Research Collaboration, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia, Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia, lina.engelen@sydney.edu.au.
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Engelen
authors.affiliation: Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
authors.forename: H M
authors.initials: HM
authors.lastname: Dhillon
authors.affiliation: Prevention Research Collaboration, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
authors.forename: J Y
authors.initials: JY
authors.lastname: Chau
authors.affiliation: Prevention Research Collaboration, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Hespe
authors.affiliation: Prevention Research Collaboration, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
authors.forename: A E
authors.initials: AE
authors.lastname: Bauman
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001108:Architecture / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards*; D001315:Australia; D015444:Exercise / Q000523:psychology; D005260:Female; D015438:Health Behavior; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010465:Perception; D057185:Sedentary Behavior; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D017132:Workplace / Q000592:standards*
keywords: Active design; indoor environment; sedentary behaviour; survey; workplace health.