title: Commissioning neuropsychiatry services: barriers and lessons.
abstract: Aims and method Previous studies have shown variations in commissioning of neuropsychiatry services and this makes access to neuropsychiatric services a post-code lottery. In this survey, we approached all mental health and neuropsychiatric service commissioners within London to map current funding and commissioning arrangements, and explored perceived barriers to neuropsychiatric service commissioning. Results 83% of commissioners within London responded. There was significant variability between neuropsychiatric services commissioned through the mental health stream. Contracting arrangements were variable. Lack of earmarked fund for neuropsychiatry and disjointed funding stream for such services were identified by commissioners as a barrier, as was the critical mass of neuropsychiatric cases. Clinical implications Neuropsychiatric service development continues to be hindered by lack of clear commissioning process. Strategic drive is needed to promote more equitable neuropsychiatric services. National or regional commissioning covering a large population will provide a better model for neuropsychiatric services to be commissioned.
authors.affiliation: Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry.
authors.forename: Rahul
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Bhattacharya
authors.affiliation: University of Birmingham.
authors.forename: Hugh
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Rickards
authors.affiliation: St George's Hospital, London.
authors.forename: Niruj
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Agrawal