title: Comparison of mouse minimum audible angle determined in prepulse inhibition and operant conditioning procedures.
abstract: Both reward based operant conditioning (OC) and reflex-based prepulse inhibition (PPI) procedures are used in sound localisation studies in mice. Since the results of both procedures are compared in the literature, it is important to assess whether they provide similar results if the same stimulus paradigm is applied. Here, we compare the sensitivity of C57BL/6 mice in OC and PPI procedures for detecting a switch in speaker location using broadband and narrowband noise stimuli and determined their minimum audible angle (MAA). In the OC procedure, we calculated d' values from the hit and false alarm rates. In the PPI procedure, we calculated the area under ROC curves from the startle response amplitudes and derived da values to obtain a sensitivity measure that corresponds to d'. For both procedures, the mean sensitivity to the speaker switch increased with an increase in angular separation. For broadband noise stimuli, a d' of up to 3.3 (OC) and a da of up to 1.1 (PPI) were observed at large speaker separations. Narrowband noise stimuli resulted in lower sensitivities in both procedures, resulting in a maximum d' of 2.0 (OC) and a maximum da of 0.3 (PPI). Using a sensitivity of 1.0 as the threshold criterion, broadband noise MAAs in the range from 32° to 46° were observed in the OC procedure whereas a broadband noise MAAs of 108° or higher were observed in the PPI procedure. In the OC procedure, narrowband noise MAAs in the range from 37° to 62° were observed. In the PPI procedure, no narrowband noise MAA could be determined since none of the subjects reached the threshold. Thus, OC procedures result in a better performance of the subjects in the sound localization task than PPI procedures, challenging the view that both procedures can be used interchangeably.
authors.affiliation: Cluster of Excellence Hearing4all, Animal Physiology and Behaviour Group, Department for Neuroscience, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Oldenburg, D-26111 Oldenburg, Germany. Electronic address: derik.behrens@uni-oldenburg.de.
authors.forename: Derik
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Behrens
authors.affiliation: Cluster of Excellence Hearing4all, Animal Physiology and Behaviour Group, Department for Neuroscience, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Oldenburg, D-26111 Oldenburg, Germany. Electronic address: georg.klump@uni-oldenburg.de.
authors.forename: Georg M
authors.initials: GM
authors.lastname: Klump
mesh_terms: D000161:Acoustic Stimulation / Q000295:instrumentation; D000162:Acoustics / Q000295:instrumentation; D000669:Amplifiers, Electronic; D000818:Animals; D001309:Auditory Threshold; D001522:Behavior, Animal; D003216:Conditioning, Operant; D005260:Female; D008297:Male; D008810:Mice, Inbred C57BL; D065808:Prepulse Inhibition; D011571:Psychoacoustics; D012372:ROC Curve; D013216:Reflex, Startle; D017603:Signal Detection, Psychological; D013017:Sound Localization; D013647:Task Performance and Analysis; D014159:Transducers
keywords: MAA; Psychophysics; Receiver operating characteristics; Sensitivity; Signal detection theory; Sound localization