title: How to choose the right statistical software?-a method increasing the post-purchase satisfaction.
abstract: Nowadays, we live in the "data era" where the use of statistical or data analysis software is inevitable, in any research field. This means that the choice of the right software tool or platform is a strategic issue for a research department. Nevertheless, in many cases decision makers do not pay the right attention to a comprehensive and appropriate evaluation of what the market offers. Indeed, the choice still depends on few factors like, for instance, researcher's personal inclination, e.g., which software have been used at the university or is already known. This is not wrong in principle, but in some cases it's not enough at all and might lead to a "dead end" situation, typically after months or years of investments already done on the wrong software. This article, far from being a full and complete guide to statistical software evaluation, aims to illustrate some key points of the decision process and introduce an extended range of factors which can help to undertake the right choice, at least in potential. There is not enough literature about that topic, most of the time underestimated, both in the traditional literature and even in the so called "gray literature", even if some documents or short pages can be found online. Anyhow, it seems there is not a common and known standpoint about the process of software evaluation from the final user perspective. We suggests a multi-factor analysis leading to an evaluation matrix tool, to be intended as a flexible and customizable tool, aimed to provide a clearer picture of the software alternatives available, not in abstract but related to the researcher's own context and needs. This method is a result of about twenty years of experience of the author in the field of evaluating and using technical-computing software and partially arises from a research made about such topics as part of a project funded by European Commission under the Lifelong Learning Programme 2011.
authors.affiliation: ADALTA snc, Italy.
authors.forename: Roberto
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Cavaliere
keywords: Software evaluation; benchmarking; software buying decision process