title: Bony Versus Soft Tissue Reconstruction for Anterior Shoulder Instability: An Expected Value Decision Analysis.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  One complication of anteroinferior glenohumeral shoulder dislocation is a critical bone defect that requires surgical repair to prevent recurrent instability. However, controversy exists regarding the surgical management because both open and arthroscopic surgeries have respective advantages and disadvantages. Moreover, it is difficult to determine the patient's preferred treatment, as factors that influence treatment choice include recurrence rates, morbidity of the procedures, and patient preferences.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  Patients who have a higher probability of recurrent instability after arthroscopic surgery will select open surgery whereas patients with a lower probability of recurrent instability after arthroscopic surgery will favor arthroscopy.
  
  
  METHODS
  Economic and decision analysis; Level of evidence, 2.
  
  
  METHODS
  A decision tree was constructed to model each hypothetical outcome after open or arthroscopic surgery for glenohumeral instability in patients with bone defects. A literature review was performed to determine the probability of occurrence for each node while utility values for each outcome were obtained via patient-administered surveys given to 50 patients without prior history of shoulder injury or dislocation. Fold-back analysis was then performed to show the optimal treatment strategy. Finally, sensitivity analysis established the thresholds at which open treatment becomes the optimal treatment.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The ultimate expected value-the objective evaluation of all potential outcomes after choosing either open or arthroscopic surgery-was found to be greater for arthroscopic surgery than for open surgery (87.17 vs 81.64), indicating it to be the preferred treatment. Results of sensitivity analysis indicated that open surgery becomes the preferred treatment when probability of recurrence after arthroscopic treatment is ≥23.8%, although varying the utility, defined as an aggregate patient preference for a particular outcome, has no effect on the model. When the rate of no complication after open surgery is 97.6%, open surgery becomes the patient's preferred treatment.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Arthroscopic surgery is an acceptable treatment if recurrent instability occurs consistently at ≤23.8%. This has important implications given the technical difficulty of successfully performing arthroscopic fixation to resolve recurrent anteroinferior glenohumeral dislocations associated with critical osseous defects. However, due to a lack of clinical outcomes studies, more research is needed to better predict the optimal operative treatment.
authors.affiliation: Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
authors.forename: Richard James
authors.initials: RJ
authors.lastname: McLaughlin
authors.affiliation: Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
authors.forename: Anthony
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Miniaci
authors.affiliation: Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
authors.forename: Morgan H
authors.initials: MH
authors.lastname: Jones
keywords: Latarjet; arthroscopic; decision analysis; glenoid; shoulder dislocation; shoulder instability