title: Investigation of Source Grating Stepping for Differential Phase-contrast Cone Beam CT (DPC-CBCT) System.
abstract: Differential phase contrast (DPC) imaging, which utilizes phase shift information of X-ray, has the potential of dramatically increasing the contrast in biological sample imaging compared to attenuation-based method that relies on X-ray absorption information, since the X-ray phase is much more sensitive than the attenuation during transmission. In a DPC imaging system, the phase stepping method is widely used to obtain DPC images: at each angle the phase grating is shifted incrementally to produce a set of images and then the so obtained images are used to retrieve DPC image. However, DPC imaging requires a high mechanical precision to perform phase stepping, which is generally one order higher than the period of phase grating. Given that phase grating period is generally 2-4 um, the requirement of mechanical accuracy and stability are very demanding (<0.5um) and difficult to meet in a system with rotating gantry. In this paper, we present a method that is able to greatly relax the requirement of mechanical accuracy and stability by stepping the source grating rather than the analyzer grating. This method is able to increase the system's mechanical tolerance without compromising image quality and make it feasible to install the system on a rotating gantry to perform differential phase-contrast cone beam CT (DPC-CBCT). It is also able to increase the grating shifting precision and as a result improve the reconstructed image quality. Mechanical tolerance investigation and image quality investigation at different phase stepping schemes and different dose levels will be carried out on both the original modality and the new modality, the results will be evaluated and compared. We will deliberately create random mechanical errors in phase stepping and evaluate the resulting DPC images and DPC-CBCT reconstructions. The contrast, noise level and sharpness will be evaluated to assess the influence of mechanical errors. By stepping the source grating, the system is expected to tolerate an error of 6-7 times bigger than that with analyzer grating stepping.
authors.affiliation: Department of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642.
authors.forename: Weixing
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Cai
authors.affiliation: Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, 14627.
authors.forename: Yang
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Yu
authors.affiliation: Department of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642; Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, 14627.
authors.forename: Ruola
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Ning
authors.affiliation: Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, 14627.
authors.forename: Jiangkun
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Liu
authors.affiliation: Koning Corporation, 150 Lucius Gordon Drive, West Henrietta, New York 14586.
authors.forename: David
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Conover
keywords: Cone Beam CT; Differential Phase Contrast; Phase Contrast; Phase Stepping