title: Influence of slice overlap on positron emission tomography image quality.
abstract: PET scans use overlapping acquisition beds to correct for reduced sensitivity at bed edges. The optimum overlap size for the General Electric (GE) Discovery 690 has not been established. This study assesses how image quality is affected by slice overlap. Efficacy of 23% overlaps (recommended by GE) and 49% overlaps (maximum possible overlap) were specifically assessed. European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) guidelines for calculating minimum injected activities based on overlap size were also reviewed. A uniform flood phantom was used to assess noise (coefficient of variation, (COV)) and voxel accuracy (activity concentrations, Bq ml(-1)). A NEMA (National Electrical Manufacturers Association) body phantom with hot/cold spheres in a background activity was used to assess contrast recovery coefficients (CRCs) and signal to noise ratios (SNR). Different overlap sizes and sphere-to-background ratios were assessed. COVs for 49% and 23% overlaps were 9% and 13% respectively. This increased noise was difficult to visualise on the 23% overlap images. Mean voxel activity concentrations were not affected by overlap size. No clinically significant differences in CRCs were observed. However, visibility and SNR of small, low contrast spheres (⩽13 mm diameter, 2:1 sphere to background ratio) may be affected by overlap size in low count studies if they are located in the overlap area. There was minimal detectable influence on image quality in terms of noise, mean activity concentrations or mean CRCs when comparing 23% overlap with 49% overlap. Detectability of small, low contrast lesions may be affected in low count studies-however, this is a worst-case scenario. The marginal benefits of increasing overlap from 23% to 49% are likely to be offset by increased patient scan times. A 23% overlap is therefore appropriate for clinical use. An amendment to EANM guidelines for calculating injected activities is also proposed which better reflects the effect overlap size has on image noise.
authors.affiliation: West of Scotland PET Centre, Tom Wheldon Building, Gartnavel General Hospital, 1053 Great Western Road, Glasgow, G12 0YN, UK.
authors.forename: Clare
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: McKeown
authors.forename: Gerry
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Gillen
authors.forename: Mary Frances
authors.initials: MF
authors.lastname: Dempsey
authors.forename: Caroline
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Findlay
mesh_terms: D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards*; D049268:Positron-Emission Tomography / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards*; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic; D059629:Signal-To-Noise Ratio