title: Explaining Spatial Variation in the Recording Effort of Citizen Science Data across Multiple Taxa.
abstract: The collation of citizen science data in open-access biodiversity databases makes temporally and spatially extensive species' observation data available to a wide range of users. Such data are an invaluable resource but contain inherent limitations, such as sampling bias in favour of recorder distribution, lack of survey effort assessment, and lack of coverage of the distribution of all organisms. Any technical assessment, monitoring program or scientific research applying citizen science data should therefore include an evaluation of the uncertainty of its results. We use 'ignorance' scores, i.e. spatially explicit indices of sampling bias across a study region, to further understand spatial patterns of observation behaviour for 13 reference taxonomic groups. The data is based on voluntary observations made in Sweden between 2000 and 2014. We compared the effect of six geographical variables (elevation, steepness, population density, log population density, road density and footpath density) on the ignorance scores of each group. We found substantial variation among taxonomic groups in the relative importance of different geographic variables for explaining ignorance scores. In general, road access and logged population density were consistently important variables explaining bias in sampling effort, indicating that access at a landscape-scale facilitates voluntary reporting by citizen scientists. Also, small increases in population density can produce a substantial reduction in ignorance score. However the between-taxa variation in the importance of geographic variables for explaining ignorance scores demonstrated that different taxa suffer from different spatial biases. We suggest that conservationists and researchers should use ignorance scores to acknowledge uncertainty in their analyses and conclusions, because they may simultaneously include many correlated variables that are difficult to disentangle.
authors.affiliation: Species Information Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), P.O. 7007, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden.
authors.forename: Louise
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Mair
authors.affiliation: Species Information Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), P.O. 7007, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden.|Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), P.O. 7004, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden.
authors.forename: Alejandro
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Ruete
mesh_terms: D063147:Animal Distribution; D000818:Animals; D003247:Conservation of Natural Resources; D003625:Data Collection; D003627:Data Interpretation, Statistical; D006801:Humans; D019359:Knowledge; D015588:Observer Variation; D013548:Sweden
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Aug 14;104(33):13384-9
references.pmid: 17686977
references.citation: Conserv Biol. 2009 Apr;23(2):307-16
references.pmid: 19183201
references.citation: Ecol Appl. 2009 Jan;19(1):181-97
references.pmid: 19323182
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Sep;24(9):467-71
references.pmid: 19586682
references.citation: PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e55158
references.pmid: 23457462
references.citation: PLoS One. 2013 Nov 18;8(11):e79168
references.pmid: 24260167
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2014 Mar;29(3):148-57
references.pmid: 24565371
references.citation: PeerJ. 2015 Jan 15;3:e704
references.pmid: 25653898
references.citation: Biodivers Data J. 2015 Jul 28;(3):e5361
references.pmid: 26312050
references.citation: Methods Ecol Evol. 2015 Apr;6(4):424-438
references.pmid: 27840673