title: The effect of activation level on muscle function during locomotion: are optimal lengths and velocities always used?
abstract: Skeletal muscle exhibits broad functional diversity, despite its inherent length and velocity constraints. The observed variation in morphology and physiology is assumed to have evolved to allow muscle to operate at its optimal length and velocity during locomotion. Here, we used the variation in optimum lengths and velocities that occurs with muscle activation level to experimentally test this assumption. Muscle ergometry and sonomicrometry were used to characterize force-length and power-velocity relationships, and in vivo operating lengths and velocities, at a range of activation levels. Operating lengths and velocities were mapped onto activation level specific force-length and power-velocity relationships to determine whether they tracked changing optima. Operating velocities decreased in line with decreased optimal velocities, suggesting that optimal velocities are always used. However, operating lengths did not change with changing optima. At high activation levels, fibres used an optimal range of lengths. However, at lower activation levels, fibres appeared to operate on the ascending limb of sub-maximally activated force-length relationships. This suggests that optimal lengths are only used when demand is greatest. This study provides the first mapping of operating lengths to activation level-specific optima, and as such, provides insight into our assumptions about the factors that determine muscle performance during locomotion.
authors.affiliation: Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA natalie.c.holt@gmail.com.
authors.forename: N C
authors.initials: NC
authors.lastname: Holt
authors.affiliation: Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Azizi
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D002024:Bufo marinus / Q000502:physiology; D008124:Locomotion; D008954:Models, Biological; D018482:Muscle, Skeletal / Q000502:physiology*
keywords: force–length; force–velocity; locomotion; recruitment
references.citation: J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2013 Jun;97(3):515-21
references.pmid: 22463130
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2013 Jun 1;216(Pt 11):2150-60
references.pmid: 23470656
references.citation: Physiol Rev. 2011 Oct;91(4):1447-531
references.pmid: 22013216
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2001 May;204(Pt 9):1529-36
references.pmid: 11296141
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2014 Dec 15;217(Pt 24):4372-8
references.pmid: 25520385
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 1998 Dec;201(Pt 23):3185-95
references.pmid: 9808832
references.citation: J Physiol. 1966 May;184(1):170-92
references.pmid: 5921536
references.citation: Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1995;72(1-2):144-9
references.pmid: 8789585
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 1986 Nov;126:63-77
references.pmid: 3806003
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2003 Sep;206(Pt 17):2941-58
references.pmid: 12878663
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 May 27;366(1570):1554-64
references.pmid: 21502126
references.citation: Am J Physiol. 1991 Feb;260(2 Pt 1):C289-96
references.pmid: 1996612
references.citation: J Biomech. 1992 Nov;25(11):1329-35
references.pmid: 1400534
references.citation: Muscle Nerve. 2002 Dec;26(6):740-68
references.pmid: 12451599
references.citation: Science. 1994 Jan 21;263(5145):370-2
references.pmid: 8278808
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2014 May 22;281(1783):20132914
references.pmid: 24718759
references.citation: Biol Lett. 2013 Feb 23;9(1):20121045
references.pmid: 23256184
references.citation: Med Biol Eng Comput. 2005 Mar;43(2):173-80
references.pmid: 15865124
references.citation: J Biomech. 2010 Aug 26;43(12):2394-9
references.pmid: 20452597
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2007 Jul;210(Pt 13):2333-45
references.pmid: 17575038
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2010 Aug 15;213(Pt 16):2770-80
references.pmid: 20675547
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2012 Oct 15;215(Pt 20):3539-51
references.pmid: 22771749
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2010 May 22;277(1687):1523-30
references.pmid: 20106852
references.citation: J Physiol. 1929 Mar 20;67(2):i3-151
references.pmid: 16994025
references.citation: Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1986;54(6):566-73
references.pmid: 3948851
references.citation: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2001 Jan;280(1):R156-65
references.pmid: 11124147
references.citation: Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2009 Mar;152(3):407-17
references.pmid: 19101645
references.citation: Acta Physiol Scand. 2001 Aug;172(4):279-85
references.pmid: 11531649
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2011 Feb 1;214(Pt 3):353-61
references.pmid: 21228194
references.citation: J Physiol. 1969 Oct;204(2):443-60
references.pmid: 5824646
references.citation: J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 1999 Oct;20(7):627-43
references.pmid: 10672511
references.citation: Am J Physiol. 1996 Aug;271(2 Pt 1):C571-8
references.pmid: 8769997
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1965 May;28(3):599-620
references.pmid: 5835487
references.citation: Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol. 1998 May;120(1):51-72
references.pmid: 9787778
references.citation: Nature. 1988 Oct 27;335(6193):824-7
references.pmid: 3185712
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2014 May 22;281(1783):20140002
references.pmid: 24695429
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Feb 5;105(5):1745-50
references.pmid: 18230734
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2000 Apr;83(4):2002-11
references.pmid: 10758110
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2011 Oct 15;214(Pt 20):3386-95
references.pmid: 21957102
references.citation: J Appl Physiol (1985). 2014 Dec 1;117(11):1308-16
references.pmid: 25257864
references.citation: Biol Lett. 2014 Sep;10(9). pii: 20140651. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0651
references.pmid: 25252838
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2001 Nov;204(Pt 21):3587-600
references.pmid: 11719526