title: Pelvic circumferential compression devices (PCCDs): a best evidence equipment review.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Traumatic disruption of the pelvis can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. ATLS(®) guidance advocates temporary stabilisation or 'closure' of the disrupted pelvis with a compression device or sheet. We undertook a best evidence equipment review to assess the ease and efficacy of the application of two leading commercially available devices, the T-POD(®) and the SAM Pelvic Sling™ II.
  
  
  METHODS
  Fifty health care professionals and medical students participated in pelvic circumferential compression device (PCCD) education and assessment. Participants received a 10-min lecture on the epidemiology and aetiology of pelvic fractures and the principles of circumferential compression, followed by a practical demonstration. Three volunteers acted as trauma victims. Assessment included the time taken to secure the devices and whether this was achieved correctly. All participants completed a post-assessment survey.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Both devices were applied correctly 100% of the time. The average time taken to secure the SAM Pelvic Sling™ II was 18 s and for the T-POD(®), it was 31 s (p ≤ 0.0001). Forty-four participants (88%) agreed or strongly agreed that the SAM Pelvic Sling™ II was easy to use compared to 84% (n = 42) for the T-POD(®). Thirty-nine participants (78%) reported that they preferred and, given the choice in the future, would select the T-POD(®) over the SAM Pelvic Sling™ II (n = 11, 22%).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The results of this study indicate that both PCCDs are easy and acceptable to use and, once learned, can be applied easily and rapidly. Participants applied both devices correctly 100% of the time, with successful application taking, on average, less than 60 s.
authors.affiliation: Emergency Department, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Infirmary Square, Leicester, LE1 5WW, UK. davidjbryson@hotmail.com.|CT2 Trauma and Orthopaedics, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK. davidjbryson@hotmail.com.|Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK. davidjbryson@hotmail.com.
authors.forename: D J
authors.initials: DJ
authors.lastname: Bryson
authors.affiliation: Emergency Department, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Infirmary Square, Leicester, LE1 5WW, UK.|Emergency Department, Lincoln County Hospital, Lincoln, Lincolnshire, UK.
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Davidson
authors.affiliation: Emergency Department, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Infirmary Square, Leicester, LE1 5WW, UK.|Emergency Department, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Mackenzie
keywords: ATLS; Circumferential compression; Fracture; Pelvic binders; Pelvic trauma
references.citation: Injury. 2009 Oct;40(10):1031-5
references.pmid: 19616209
references.citation: J Trauma. 2007 Jun;62(6 Suppl):S32
references.pmid: 17556957
references.citation: J Orthop Trauma. 2005 Oct;19(9):661-5
references.pmid: 16247313
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84-A Suppl 2:43-7
references.pmid: 12479338
references.citation: Injury. 2008 Aug;39(8):903-6
references.pmid: 18586248
references.citation: J Am Coll Surg. 2007 May;204(5):935-9; discussion 940-2
references.pmid: 17481514
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010 Nov;92(11):1481-8
references.pmid: 21037339
references.citation: J Trauma. 2005 Sep;59(3):659-64
references.pmid: 16361909
references.citation: Injury. 2009 Oct;40(10):1023-30
references.pmid: 19371871