title: Semantic Factors Predict the Rate of Lexical Replacement of Content Words.
abstract: The rate of lexical replacement estimates the diachronic stability of word forms on the basis of how frequently a proto-language word is replaced or retained in its daughter languages. Lexical replacement rate has been shown to be highly related to word class and word frequency. In this paper, we argue that content words and function words behave differently with respect to lexical replacement rate, and we show that semantic factors predict the lexical replacement rate of content words. For the 167 content items in the Swadesh list, data was gathered on the features of lexical replacement rate, word class, frequency, age of acquisition, synonyms, arousal, imageability and average mutual information, either from published databases or gathered from corpora and lexica. A linear regression model shows that, in addition to frequency, synonyms, senses and imageability are significantly related to the lexical replacement rate of content words-in particular the number of synonyms that a word has. The model shows no differences in lexical replacement rate between word classes, and outperforms a model with word class and word frequency predictors only.
authors.affiliation: Department of Linguistics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
authors.forename: Susanne
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Vejdemo
authors.affiliation: Department of Linguistics, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
authors.forename: Thomas
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Hörberg
mesh_terms: D005060:Europe; D006801:Humans; D012660:Semantics; D014705:Verbal Behavior; D014825:Vocabulary
references.citation: Cognition. 2015 Oct;143:87-92
references.pmid: 26117487
references.citation: Brain. 1999 Dec;122 ( Pt 12):2337-44
references.pmid: 10581226
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 1995 Summer;7(3):376-95
references.pmid: 23961867
references.citation: Psychosom Med. 2004 May-Jun;66(3):411-21
references.pmid: 15184705
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Apr 12;366(1567):1101-7
references.pmid: 21357232
references.citation: Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars). 2011;71(4):455-78
references.pmid: 22237493
references.citation: Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2004 Aug;36(3):384-7
references.pmid: 15641427
references.citation: Brain. 2005 Mar;128(Pt 3):615-27
references.pmid: 15548554
references.citation: Brain Res. 2009 Jul 28;1282:38-49
references.pmid: 19465009
references.citation: Nature. 2007 Oct 11;449(7163):717-20
references.pmid: 17928860
references.citation: Annu Rev Psychol. 2011;62:621-47
references.pmid: 20809790
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2001;39(1):91-102
references.pmid: 11115658
references.citation: Behav Res Methods. 2014 Sep;46(3):904-11
references.pmid: 24142837
references.citation: Behav Res Methods. 2012 Dec;44(4):978-90
references.pmid: 22581493
references.citation: Cognition. 2014 Dec;133(3):530-4
references.pmid: 25215929
references.citation: Behav Res Methods. 2013 Dec;45(4):1191-207
references.pmid: 23404613