title: Discussion: A Systematic Review of Surgical Randomized Controlled Trials: Part I. Risk of Bias and Outcomes: Common Pitfalls Plastic Surgeons Can Overcome.
authors.affiliation: London and Oxford, United Kingdom; and Boston, Mass. From the Department of Plastic Surgery, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust; Balliol College, University of Oxford; Brigham and Women's Hospital; and Harvard Medical School.
authors.forename: Riaz A
authors.initials: RA
authors.lastname: Agha
authors.forename: Dennis P
authors.initials: DP
authors.lastname: Orgill
mesh_terms: D015982:Bias; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D013518:Surgery, Plastic
references.citation: Voineskos SH, Coroneos CJ, Ziolkowski NI, et al. A systematic review of surgical randomized controlled trials part 1. Risk of bias and outcomes: Common pitfalls plastic surgeons can overcome. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137:696–706
references.citation: Agha RA, Camm CF, Edison E, Orgill DP. The methodological quality of randomized controlled trials in plastic surgery needs improvement: A systematic review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013;66:447–452
references.citation: Agha RA, Camm CF, Doganay E, Edison E, Siddiqui MR, Orgill DP. Randomised controlled trials in plastic surgery: A systematic review of reporting quality. Eur J Plast Surg. 2013;37:55–62