title: Heterogeneity in Primary Productivity Influences Competitive Interactions between Red Deer and Alpine Chamois.
abstract: Habitat heterogeneity can promote coexistence between herbivores of different body size limited to different extents by resource quantity and quality. Red deer (Cervus elaphus) are known as superior competitors to smaller species with similar diets. We compared competitive interactions and habitat use between red deer and Alpine chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra) in two adjacent valleys in a strictly protected area in the Central Alps. Red deer density was higher in the valley with higher primary productivity. Only here was horn growth in kid and yearling chamois (as a measure for body condition) negatively correlated with red deer population size, suggesting interspecific competition, and chamois selected meadows with steeper slopes and lower productivity than available on average. Conversely, red deer selected meadows of high productivity, particularly in the poorer area. As these were located mainly at lower elevations, this led to strong altitudinal segregation between the two species here. Local differences in interspecific competition thus coincided with differences in habitat preference and-segregation between areas. This suggests that spatial habitat and resource heterogeneity at the scale of adjacent valleys can provide competition refuges for competitively inferior mountain ungulates which differ from their superior competitor in their metabolic requirements.
authors.affiliation: Swiss National Park, Chastè Planta-Wildenberg, 7530 Zernez, Switzerland.
authors.forename: Pia
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Anderwald
authors.affiliation: Swiss National Park, Chastè Planta-Wildenberg, 7530 Zernez, Switzerland.
authors.forename: Rudolf M
authors.initials: RM
authors.lastname: Haller
authors.affiliation: Swiss National Park, Chastè Planta-Wildenberg, 7530 Zernez, Switzerland.
authors.forename: Flurin
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Filli
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D000835:Animals, Wild; D001522:Behavior, Animal / Q000502:physiology*; D003670:Deer / Q000502:physiology*; D017753:Ecosystem; D060434:Herbivory / Q000502:physiology*; D048608:Rupicapra / Q000502:physiology*
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2005 Sep;20(9):503-10
references.pmid: 16701427
references.citation: J Anim Ecol. 2006 Sep;75(5):1110-8
references.pmid: 16922846
references.citation: Ecology. 2006 Oct;87(10):2626-35
references.pmid: 17089670
references.citation: Ecology. 2007 Feb;88(2):381-90
references.pmid: 17479756
references.citation: Ecology. 2008 May;89(5):1457-68
references.pmid: 18543637
references.citation: Am J Phys Anthropol. 2009 Nov;140(3):562-71
references.pmid: 19544575
references.citation: Oecologia. 2010 May;163(1):91-7
references.pmid: 20033821
references.citation: J Anim Ecol. 2011 Mar;80(2):438-47
references.pmid: 21073455
references.citation: Oecologia. 1989 May;79(3):383-9
references.pmid: 23921404
references.citation: Oecologia. 2001 Apr;127(2):230-238
references.pmid: 24577654
references.citation: Mov Ecol. 2015 Mar 14;3:6
references.pmid: 26807258
references.citation: Oecologia. 1989 Mar;78(4):443-457
references.pmid: 28312172
references.citation: Oecologia. 1990 Feb;82(2):264-274
references.pmid: 28312674