title: Commentary: Cognitive reflection vs. calculation in decision making.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo Waterloo, ON, Canada.
authors.forename: Gordon
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Pennycook
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Royal Holloway, University of LondonLondon, UK; ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders, Macquarie UniversitySydney, NSW, Australia.
authors.forename: Robert M
authors.initials: RM
authors.lastname: Ross
keywords: Cognitive Reflection Test; biases; dual-process theory; individual differences; numeracy
references.citation: Perspect Psychol Sci. 2013 May;8(3):223-41
references.pmid: 26172965
references.citation: Science. 2012 Apr 27;336(6080):493-6
references.pmid: 22539725
references.citation: Cognition. 2015 Sep;142:312-21
references.pmid: 26072277
references.citation: Behav Res Methods. 2016 Mar;48(1):341-8
references.pmid: 25740762
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012 Aug;141(3):423-8
references.pmid: 21928924
references.citation: Cognition. 2012 Jun;123(3):335-46
references.pmid: 22481051
references.citation: Front Psychol. 2015 May 07;6:532
references.pmid: 25999877
references.citation: Ann Intern Med. 1997 Dec 1;127(11):966-72
references.pmid: 9412301
references.citation: Behav Brain Sci. 2000 Oct;23(5):645-65; discussion 665-726
references.pmid: 11301544