title: Rheumatic heart disease screening by "point-of-care" echocardiography: an acceptable alternative in resource limited settings?
abstract: Rheumatic heart disease (RHD) is estimated to affect over 20 million people worldwide, the vast majority being in developing countries. Screening for RHD has been recommended by World Health Organization (WHO) since 2004. Conventionally, auscultation has been used for diagnosing RHD. Auscultation has its limitations and may not detect mild cases. With the evolution of portable echocardiographic systems, mass screening for subclinical RHD has become possible. Portable echo has the advantage of rapid access and hence screening in schools or communities is possible. Its cost is lower than that of standard echo equipment. A large number of studies have reported echocardiographic screening for RHD over the last decade or so. A 3-10 fold increase in prevalence of RHD has been detected by using portable echo when compared with conventional method of auscultation. More recently, a small, compact, easy to carry in a pocket, hand held system has been introduced which is much cheaper than the conventional portable system. A few previous reports have shown the feasibility of using hand held echo system for diagnosis of various cardiac diseases. A recently published article has shown that the hand held system can be used to screen for RHD. It is more sensitive than the conventional auscultation for RHD. Authors of this report have concluded that screening with the hand held device may be a more cost effective strategy for screening for RHD in resource limited settings, since it is much cheaper than the portable echocardiography equipment.
authors.affiliation: Department of Cardiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
authors.forename: Anita
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Saxena
keywords: Rheumatic heart disease (RHD); echocardiography; screening
references.citation: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Jun 15;37(8):2013-8
references.pmid: 11419879
references.citation: Ann Intern Med. 1964 Feb;60:SUPPL 5:68-86
references.pmid: 14118549
references.citation: World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 2004;923:1-122, back cover
references.pmid: 15382606
references.citation: Cardiol Young. 2011 Aug;21(4):436-43
references.pmid: 21450132
references.citation: Echocardiography. 2011 Oct;28(9):929-33
references.pmid: 21854437
references.citation: Pediatrics. 2015 Apr;135(4):e939-44
references.pmid: 25780068
references.citation: Bull World Health Organ. 1992;70(2):213-8
references.pmid: 1600581
references.citation: J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2003 Sep;16(9):901-5
references.pmid: 12931101
references.citation: Anadolu Kardiyol Derg. 2011 Nov;11(7):627-32
references.pmid: 21959878
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2007 Aug 2;357(5):439-41
references.pmid: 17671252
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2007 Aug 2;357(5):470-6
references.pmid: 17671255
references.citation: Am J Cardiol. 2010 Jun 15;105(12 ):1809-14
references.pmid: 20538135
references.citation: Heart. 2011 Dec;97(24):2018-22
references.pmid: 22076022
references.citation: Am Heart J. 2004 Mar;147(3):476-81
references.pmid: 14999197
references.citation: Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med. 2008 Jul;5(7):411-7
references.pmid: 18398402
references.citation: J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2014 Jan;27(1):42-9
references.pmid: 24183541
references.citation: J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011 Feb;24(2):117-24
references.pmid: 21074362