title: On the evolution of developmental mechanisms: Divergent polarities in leaf growth as a case study.
abstract: Most model plants used to study leaf growth share a common developmental mechanism, namely basipetal growth polarity, wherein the distal end differentiates first with progressively more proliferative cells toward the base. Therefore, this base-to-tip growth pattern has served as a paradigm to explain leaf growth and also formed the basis for several computational models. However, our recent report in The Plant Cell on the investigation of leaf growth in 75 eudicot species covering a wide range of eudicot families showed that leaves grow with divergent polarities in the proximo-distal axis or without any obvious polarity. This divergence in growth polarity is linked to the expression divergence of a conserved microRNA-transcription factor module. This study raises several questions on the evolutionary origin of leaf growth pattern, such as 'when and why in evolution did the divergent growth polarities arise?' and 'what were the molecular changes that led to this divergence?'. Here, we discuss a few of these questions in some detail.
authors.affiliation: a Department of Microbiology and Cell Biology , Indian Institute of Science , Bangalore , India.
authors.forename: Mainak Das
authors.initials: MD
authors.lastname: Gupta
authors.affiliation: a Department of Microbiology and Cell Biology , Indian Institute of Science , Bangalore , India.
authors.forename: Utpal
authors.initials: U
authors.lastname: Nath
mesh_terms: D005075:Biological Evolution; D063245:Plant Development; D018515:Plant Leaves / Q000254:growth & development*; D013045:Species Specificity
keywords: Compound leaf; Leaf development; evolution of growth pattern; growth allometry; micro RNA; polarity
references.citation: Dev Cell. 2012 Jan 17;22(1):64-78
references.pmid: 22227310
references.citation: Arabidopsis Book. 2013 Jun 07;11:e0163
references.pmid: 23864837
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2012 May;159(1):27-39
references.pmid: 22402928
references.citation: Science. 2012 Mar 2;335(6072):1092-6
references.pmid: 22383846
references.citation: J Exp Bot. 2011 Jan;62(2):761-73
references.pmid: 21036927
references.citation: Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2014 Feb;17:146-52
references.pmid: 24507506
references.citation: Dev Biol. 1999 Nov 15;215(2):407-19
references.pmid: 10545247
references.citation: Nat Genet. 2006 Aug;38(8):942-7
references.pmid: 16823378
references.citation: Dev Biol. 1992 Sep;153(1):44-58
references.pmid: 1516751
references.citation: Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2014 Feb;17:103-9
references.pmid: 24507501
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2015 Oct;27(10 ):2785-99
references.pmid: 26410303
references.citation: New Phytol. 2005 Sep;167(3):693-710
references.pmid: 16101907
references.citation: Planta. 2014 Jul;240(1):125-35
references.pmid: 24718490
references.citation: Nature. 2009 Feb 26;457(7233):1150-3
references.pmid: 19182776
references.citation: Development. 2010 Jan;137(1):103-12
references.pmid: 20023165
references.citation: Planta. 1985 Aug;165(2):158-69
references.pmid: 24241040
references.citation: Dev Cell. 2012 Jan 17;22(1):9-11
references.pmid: 22264727
references.citation: Science. 2002 Jun 7;296(5574):1858-60
references.pmid: 12052958
references.citation: Science. 2003 Feb 28;299(5611):1404-7
references.pmid: 12610308