title: Surface hydrophobicity of slippery zones in the pitchers of two Nepenthes species and a hybrid.
abstract: To investigate the hydrophobicity of slippery zones, static contact angle measurement and microstructure observation of slippery surfaces from two Nepenthes species and a hybrid were conducted. Marginally different static contact angles were observed, as the smallest (133.83°) and greatest (143.63°) values were recorded for the N. alata and N. miranda respectively, and the median value (140.40°) was presented for the N. khasiana. The slippery zones under investigation exhibited rather similar surface morphologies, but different structural dimensions. These findings probably suggest that the geometrical dimensions of surface architecture exert primary effects on differences in the hydrophobicity of the slippery zone. Based on the Wenzel and Cassie-Baxter equations, models were proposed to analyze the manner in which geometrical dimensions affect the hydrophobicity of the slippery surfaces. The results of our analysis demonstrated that the different structural dimensions of lunate cells and wax platelets make the slippery zones present different real area of the rough surface and thereby generate somewhat distinguishable hydrophobicity. The results support a supplementary interpretation of surface hydrophobicity in plant leaves, and provide a theoretical foundation for developing bioinspired materials with hydrophobic properties and self-cleaning abilities.
authors.affiliation: School of Mechanical Engineering, Hebei University of Science and Technology, Shijiazhuang 050018, China.
authors.forename: Lixin
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Wang
authors.affiliation: College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China.
authors.forename: Qiang
authors.initials: Q
authors.lastname: Zhou
mesh_terms: D057927:Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Interactions; D018625:Microscopy, Atomic Force; D013499:Surface Properties; D064028:Tracheophyta / Q000737:chemistry* / Q000648:ultrastructure
references.citation: Arthropod Struct Dev. 2004 Jan;33(1):103-11
references.pmid: 18089026
references.citation: Nature. 2011 Sep 21;477(7365):443-7
references.pmid: 21938066
references.citation: Planta. 2007 May;225(6):1517-34
references.pmid: 17109149
references.citation: Nat Mater. 2003 Jul;2(7):457-60
references.pmid: 12819775
references.citation: Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2014 Oct;43:310-6
references.pmid: 25175218
references.citation: Beilstein J Nanotechnol. 2011;2:228-36
references.pmid: 21977435
references.citation: J Exp Bot. 2009;60(1):19-42
references.pmid: 19213724
references.citation: Sci Rep. 2013 Oct 29;3:3078
references.pmid: 24165663
references.citation: Beilstein J Nanotechnol. 2011;2:302-10
references.pmid: 21977443
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2005 Dec;208(Pt 24):4651-62
references.pmid: 16326946
references.citation: Nat Mater. 2003 May;2(5):301-6
references.pmid: 12728235
references.citation: Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2006 Nov;8(6):740-7
references.pmid: 17203429
references.citation: Planta. 2003 Nov;218(1):87-97
references.pmid: 12883887
references.citation: Bioinspir Biomim. 2013 Sep;8(3):036005
references.pmid: 23838014
references.citation: Langmuir. 2004 Sep 14;20(19):8209-13
references.pmid: 15350093
references.citation: Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2006 Nov;8(6):841-8
references.pmid: 17203436
references.citation: Science. 2007 Dec 7;318(5856):1618-22
references.pmid: 18063796
references.citation: Plant Signal Behav. 2010 Jun;5(6):644-8
references.pmid: 21135573
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2010 Apr;213(Pt 7):1115-25
references.pmid: 20228348
references.citation: New Phytol. 2002 Dec;156(3):479-489
references.pmid: 33873580
references.citation: Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2009 Apr 28;367(1893):1487-509
references.pmid: 19324720