title: Comparison of SNP and CAPS markers application in genetic research in wheat and barley.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Barley and bread wheat show large differences in frequencies of Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) as determined from genome-wide studies. These frequencies have been estimated as 2.4-3 times higher in the entire barley genome than within each diploid genomes of wheat (A, B or D). However, barley SNPs within individual genes occur significantly more frequently than quoted. Differences between wheat and barley are based on the origin and evolutionary history of the species. Bread wheat contains rarer SNPs due to the double genetic 'bottle-neck' created by natural hybridisation and spontaneous polyploidisation. Furthermore, wheat has the lowest level of useful SNP-derived markers while barley is estimated to have the highest level of polymorphism.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Different strategies are required for the development of suitable molecular markers in these cereal species. For example, SNP markers based on high-throughput technology (Infinium or KASP) are very effective and useful in both barley and bread wheat. In contrast, Cleaved Amplified Polymorphic Sequences (CAPS) are more widely and successfully employed in small-scale experiments with highly polymorphic genetic regions containing multiple SNPs in barley, but not in wheat. However, preliminary 'in silico' search databases for assessing the potential value of SNPs have yet to be developed.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This mini-review summarises results supporting the development of different strategies for the application of effective SNP and CAPS markers in wheat and barley.
authors.affiliation: School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia. yuri.shavrukov@adelaide.edu.au.|Department of Biological Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia. yuri.shavrukov@adelaide.edu.au.
authors.forename: Yuri
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Shavrukov
mesh_terms: D019143:Evolution, Molecular; D005819:Genetic Markers; D036281:Genetic Research; D001467:Hordeum / Q000235:genetics*; D011110:Polymorphism, Genetic; D020641:Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; D014908:Triticum / Q000235:genetics*
chemical_list: D005819:Genetic Markers
references.citation: Genome. 2003 Jun;46(3):431-7
references.pmid: 12834059
references.citation: DNA Res. 2012 Dec;19(6):449-61
references.pmid: 23103470
references.citation: Nat Rev Genet. 2002 Jun;3(6):429-41
references.pmid: 12042770
references.citation: Plant Biotechnol J. 2009 May;7(4):318-25
references.pmid: 19386040
references.citation: Theor Appl Genet. 2004 Aug;109(3):543-51
references.pmid: 15146316
references.citation: Theor Appl Genet. 2012 Feb;124(3):555-64
references.pmid: 22038487
references.citation: Genetics. 2005 Sep;171(1):323-32
references.pmid: 15996988
references.citation: Hereditas. 2001;135(2-3):145-51
references.pmid: 12152327
references.citation: Methods Mol Biol. 2014;1145:75-86
references.pmid: 24816661
references.citation: Theor Appl Genet. 2011 Feb;122(3):523-31
references.pmid: 21076812
references.citation: BMC Genomics. 2009 Dec 04;10:582
references.pmid: 19961604
references.citation: BMC Plant Biol. 2012 Jan 26;12:14
references.pmid: 22280551
references.citation: Theor Appl Genet. 2009 Nov;119(8):1507-22
references.pmid: 19789848
references.citation: Mol Genet Genomics. 2005 Dec;274(5):515-27
references.pmid: 16244872
references.citation: BMC Genet. 2015 Jul 29;16:92
references.pmid: 26219378
references.citation: Theor Appl Genet. 2015 Feb;128(2):283-90
references.pmid: 25412992
references.citation: Genetics. 2004 Oct;168(2):1087-96
references.pmid: 15514080
references.citation: Plant Biotechnol J. 2015 Jun;13(5):648-63
references.pmid: 25424506
references.citation: Plant Biotechnol J. 2010 Jan;8(1):2-9
references.pmid: 19906089
references.citation: Biotechnol Adv. 2012 Sep-Oct;30(5):1071-88
references.pmid: 21989506
references.citation: Plant Mol Biol. 2002 Mar-Apr;48(5-6):529-37
references.pmid: 11999833
references.citation: Plant Genome. 2015 Mar;8(1):eplantgenome2014.05.0020
references.pmid: 33228279
references.citation: Nature. 2012 Nov 29;491(7426):711-6
references.pmid: 23075845
references.citation: Science. 2014 Jul 18;345(6194):1250092
references.pmid: 25035499
references.citation: BMC Plant Biol. 2014 Sep 28;14:258
references.pmid: 25928569
references.citation: Theor Appl Genet. 2015 Jan;128(1):131-43
references.pmid: 25367379
references.citation: Science. 2014 Jul 18;345(6194):285-7
references.pmid: 25035484
references.citation: Theor Appl Genet. 2011 Aug;123(4):555-69
references.pmid: 21611761
references.citation: Theor Appl Genet. 2007 Aug;115(4):451-61
references.pmid: 17571251
references.citation: Plant Biotechnol J. 2012 Aug;10(6):743-9
references.pmid: 22748104
references.citation: Genetika. 2012 May;48(5):628-33
references.pmid: 22830258
references.citation: Plant Biotechnol J. 2014 Aug;12(6):787-96
references.pmid: 24646323
references.citation: Genome. 2006 Sep;49(9):1131-9
references.pmid: 17110993
references.citation: Plant Biotechnol J. 2015 Jan;13(1):97-104
references.pmid: 25147022
references.citation: Theor Appl Genet. 2007 Apr;114(6):1039-50
references.pmid: 17287975
references.citation: Theor Appl Genet. 2013 Dec;126(12):3091-102
references.pmid: 24068343
references.citation: Int J Plant Genomics. 2012;2012:831460
references.pmid: 23227038
references.citation: Plant Biotechnol J. 2009 May;7(4):326-33
references.pmid: 19386041
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2014 Jul;1320:16-34
references.pmid: 24903334
references.citation: BMC Plant Biol. 2015 May 22;15:125
references.pmid: 25998066
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Jun 11;99(12):8133-8
references.pmid: 12060759