title: Diclofenac-Induced Photo-Onycholysis.
abstract: Onycholysis is the detachment of the nail plate from the nail bed. If drug-induced, it can be an isolated phenomenon, but it may also accompany or follow a cutaneous phototoxicity reaction due to drug intake and exposure to ultraviolet irradiation. Photo-onycholysis is a rare photosensitivity reaction due to exposure to either a natural or artificial source of light. Many drugs are responsible for this phototoxic reaction, especially tetracyclines, psoralens, chloramphenicol, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, fluoroquinolones, and, rarely, doxycycline. Any patient given enough of a therapeutic dose of an inducing drug and sufficient light irradiation can develop phototoxic reactions. While there is no need to avoid these drugs completely, precautions should be taken. Here we have reported the case of a patient who developed onycholysis of his fingernails with sparing of the toenails following administration of diclofenac therapy for lower back pain. The onycholysis was associated with a phototoxic reaction. The swellings resolved totally within two days, and the patient started to notice the separation of all fingernail plates from their nail beds. The patient was treated symptomatically. On follow-up, onycholysis had regressed slowly, and the condition recovered totally within three months without any sequelae.
authors.affiliation: Department of Dermatology, Sultan Qaboos Hospital, Salalah, Oman.
authors.forename: Lutfi
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Al-Kathiri
authors.affiliation: Department of Dermatology, Al Nahdha Hospital, Muscat, Oman.
authors.forename: Abla
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Al-Asmaili
keywords: Diclofenac; Nails; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Photo-onycholysis; Phototoxicity; Psoralen; Tetracycline; Ultraviolet Rays
references.citation: Acta Dermatovenerol Alp Pannonica Adriat. 2004 Dec;13(4):135-6
references.pmid: 15818449
references.citation: J Am Acad Dermatol. 1989 Dec;21(6):1304-5
references.pmid: 2573622
references.citation: Acta Derm Venereol. 1986;66(6):510-4
references.pmid: 2433871
references.citation: Ann Dermatol Venereol. 1990;117(5):367-9
references.pmid: 2400183
references.citation: Cutis. 1979 May;23(5):657-8
references.pmid: 456035
references.citation: J Invest Dermatol. 1993 Sep;101(3):329-33
references.pmid: 8370969
references.citation: Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2002 Aug;18(4):202-7
references.pmid: 12390677
references.citation: Arch Dermatol. 1971 May;103(5):520-1
references.pmid: 5580296
references.citation: Ann Dermatol Venereol. 1982;109(2):165-6
references.pmid: 7092064
references.citation: Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1994 Nov;56(5):587-91
references.pmid: 7955823
references.citation: Acta Derm Venereol. 1983;63(6):555-7
references.pmid: 6198853
references.citation: J Drugs Dermatol. 2003 Dec;2(6):662-3
references.pmid: 14711147
references.citation: J Am Acad Dermatol. 1987 Dec;17(6):1012-6
references.pmid: 2963036
references.citation: Cutis. 1981;27(1):53-4
references.pmid: 7471807
references.citation: Br J Dermatol. 1985 Nov;113(5):605-10
references.pmid: 4063194
references.citation: Drug Saf. 1999 Sep;21(3):187-201
references.pmid: 10487397