title: Songs for the Ego: Theorizing Musical Self-Enhancement.
abstract: This paper outlines a theoretical account of musical self-enhancement. I claim that listening to music serves as a resource for actively manipulating affective states so that a positive self-view is maintained and a sense of optimism is provided. Self-enhancement-the process by which individuals modify their self-worth and gain self-esteem-typically takes place in social interactions. I argue that experiencing music may serve as a unique "esthetic surrogate" for interaction, which equally enables self-enhancement. This ability relies on three main characteristics of the musical experience, namely, its capacity to (a) evoke empathetic feelings, (b) elicit social cohesion and affiliation, and (c) elicit feelings of reward. I outline how these characteristics relate to theories of music cognition and empirical findings in psychology and neuroscience research. I also explain the specifics of musical self-enhancement and how it differs from music's other regulatory functions such as mood- and emotion regulation. My aim in introducing the notion of musical self-enhancement is to broaden our understanding of how music functions as an environmental resource entailing access to unique affective states and how musical experiences are co-constituted by both the agent and the sonic environment. This specific use of music for self-enhancement can be regarded as a form of affective niche construction, providing the external conditions in which people can experience themselves more positively and maintain high self-esteem.
authors.affiliation: Department of Music, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics Frankfurt, Germany.
authors.forename: Paul
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Elvers
keywords: music; music and affectivity; music and emotion; music and social cognition; self-enhancement; self-esteem
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2001 Jul;108(3):593-623
references.pmid: 11488379
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Sep 25;98(20):11818-23
references.pmid: 11573015
references.citation: J Soc Psychol. 2001 Oct;141(5):565-81
references.pmid: 11758036
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2002 Jan;109(1):3-25
references.pmid: 11863040
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Jan;84(1):165-76
references.pmid: 12518977
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Jun;84(6):1236-56
references.pmid: 12793587
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 2004 May;130(3):435-68
references.pmid: 15122930
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2006 Mar;17(3):236-42
references.pmid: 16507064
references.citation: Nature. 2007 Nov 1;450(7166):102-5
references.pmid: 17960136
references.citation: Conscious Cogn. 2008 Jun;17(2):514-22
references.pmid: 18411058
references.citation: J Exp Child Psychol. 2009 Mar;102(3):299-314
references.pmid: 18789454
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009 Mar;1156:97-117
references.pmid: 19338505
references.citation: Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2009 Nov;35(11):1500-11
references.pmid: 19648562
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2011 Feb;14(2):257-62
references.pmid: 21217764
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 1998 Dec 1;2(12):493-501
references.pmid: 21227300
references.citation: Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2011 Sep;37(9):1159-71
references.pmid: 21543650
references.citation: Br J Psychiatry. 2011 Aug;199(2):92-3
references.pmid: 21804144
references.citation: Cogn Behav Ther. 2012;41(2):163-73
references.pmid: 22439697
references.citation: Int J Psychol. 2012;47(5):355-69
references.pmid: 22506759
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2013 Apr;17(4):179-93
references.pmid: 23541122
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013 Nov;105(5):777-98
references.pmid: 23895270
references.citation: Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013 Nov;39(11):1484-96
references.pmid: 23928397
references.citation: Front Psychol. 2013 Aug 13;4:511
references.pmid: 23964257
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Oct 29;110(44):17784-9
references.pmid: 24127588
references.citation: Front Neurosci. 2013 Dec 30;7:258
references.pmid: 24415994
references.citation: Front Psychol. 2014 Jan 06;4:1003
references.pmid: 24432008
references.citation: Front Psychol. 2014 Sep 30;5:1096
references.pmid: 25324805
references.citation: Perspect Psychol Sci. 2008 Mar;3(2):102-16
references.pmid: 26158877
references.citation: J Comp Neurol. 2016 Jun 1;524(8):1676-86
references.pmid: 26172307
references.citation: Lancet. 2015 Oct 24;386(10004):1659-71
references.pmid: 26277246
references.citation: Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Aug 26;9:466
references.pmid: 26379529
references.citation: Phys Life Rev. 2015 Dec;15:61-88
references.pmid: 26419700
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1989 Oct;57(4):672-80
references.pmid: 2795437
references.citation: Cogn Emot. 2003 Mar;17(2):263-295
references.pmid: 29715723
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 1988 Mar;103(2):193-210
references.pmid: 3283814
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987 Jan;52(1):72-80
references.pmid: 3820080
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1993 Mar;64(3):421-30
references.pmid: 8468670