title: Humans Integrate Monetary and Liquid Incentives to Motivate Cognitive Task Performance.
abstract: It is unequivocal that a wide variety of incentives can motivate behavior. However, few studies have explicitly examined whether and how different incentives are integrated in terms of their motivational influence. The current study examines the combined effects of monetary and liquid incentives on cognitive processing, and whether appetitive and aversive incentives have distinct influences. We introduce a novel task paradigm, in which participants perform cued task-switching for monetary rewards that vary parametrically across trials, with liquid incentives serving as post-trial performance feedback. Critically, the symbolic meaning of the liquid was held constant (indicating successful reward attainment), while liquid valence was blocked. In the first experiment, monetary rewards combined additively with appetitive liquid feedback to improve subject task performance. Aversive liquid feedback counteracted monetary reward effects in low monetary reward trials, particularly in a subset of participants who tended to avoid responding under these conditions. Self-report motivation ratings predicted behavioral performance above and beyond experimental effects. A follow-up experiment replicated the predictive power of motivation ratings even when only appetitive liquids were used, suggesting that ratings reflect idiosyncratic subjective values of, rather than categorical differences between, the liquid incentives. Together, the findings indicate an integrative relationship between primary and secondary incentives and potentially dissociable influences in modulating motivational value, while informing hypotheses regarding candidate neural mechanisms.
authors.affiliation: Cognitive Control and Psychopathology Lab, Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis St. Louis, MO, USA.
authors.forename: Debbie M
authors.initials: DM
authors.lastname: Yee
authors.affiliation: Cognitive Control and Psychopathology Lab, Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis St. Louis, MO, USA.
authors.forename: Marie K
authors.initials: MK
authors.lastname: Krug
authors.affiliation: Cognitive Control and Psychopathology Lab, Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis St. Louis, MO, USA.
authors.forename: Ariel Z
authors.initials: AZ
authors.lastname: Allen
authors.affiliation: Cognitive Control and Psychopathology Lab, Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis St. Louis, MO, USA.
authors.forename: Todd S
authors.initials: TS
authors.lastname: Braver
keywords: cognitive control; decision-making; motivation; primary and secondary incentives; reward; reward integration; subjective value
references.citation: Front Psychol. 2011 Jul 14;2:163
references.pmid: 21808629
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2013 Oct 23;33(43):16961-70
references.pmid: 24155301
references.citation: Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012 Sep;37(10):2244-52
references.pmid: 22643930
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Jul;9(7):545-56
references.pmid: 18545266
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2009 Jun;101(6):3284-93
references.pmid: 19339460
references.citation: J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81
references.pmid: 18929686
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2001 Aug 15;21(16):RC159
references.pmid: 11459880
references.citation: Neuron. 2002 Feb 28;33(5):815-26
references.pmid: 11879657
references.citation: Front Behav Neurosci. 2010 Nov 04;4:170
references.pmid: 21120145
references.citation: PLoS One. 2013 Sep 13;8(9):e74106
references.pmid: 24058520
references.citation: Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013 May;37(4):681-96
references.pmid: 23415703
references.citation: Front Psychol. 2015 Jan 22;6:2
references.pmid: 25657634
references.citation: Neuroscientist. 2004 Jun;10 (3):260-8
references.pmid: 15155064
references.citation: Neuron. 2013 Jul 24;79(2):217-40
references.pmid: 23889930
references.citation: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2012 Dec;22(6):1027-38
references.pmid: 22766486
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Dec;8(12):539-46
references.pmid: 15556023
references.citation: Science. 2009 May 1;324(5927):646-8
references.pmid: 19407204
references.citation: Physiol Behav. 2007 Jan 30;90(1):36-42
references.pmid: 17052736
references.citation: Neuropsychopharmacology. 2010 Aug;35(9):1943-51
references.pmid: 20463658
references.citation: Neuropsychopharmacology. 2013 Jul;38(8):1495-503
references.pmid: 23419875
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2011 May 25;31(21):7867-75
references.pmid: 21613500
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2009 Sep 30;29(39):12315-20
references.pmid: 19793990
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2011 Jun 22;31(25):9307-14
references.pmid: 21697380
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Nov;31(6):1477-91
references.pmid: 16393058
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2000 Jul;12(1):20-7
references.pmid: 10875899
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005 Sep;6(9):691-702
references.pmid: 16136173
references.citation: J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3):null
references.pmid: 24403724
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2008 Jan 9;28(2):360-8
references.pmid: 18184778
references.citation: Front Hum Neurosci. 2009 Mar 30;3:4
references.pmid: 19434242
references.citation: Psychol Res. 2016 Sep;80(5):860-76
references.pmid: 26215433
references.citation: PLoS One. 2010 Feb 16;5(2):e9251
references.pmid: 20169080
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2011 Apr;21(4):769-76
references.pmid: 20732900
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011 Dec;1239:130-7
references.pmid: 22145882
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Aug;10(8):375-81
references.pmid: 16843041
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2009 Nov 18;29(46):14617-26
references.pmid: 19923294
references.citation: Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2007 Apr;191(3):507-20
references.pmid: 17031711
references.citation: Physiol Behav. 2009 Jul 14;97(5):537-50
references.pmid: 19336238
references.citation: Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Apr;73(3):938-52
references.pmid: 21264699
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Dec;17(6):821-6
references.pmid: 21169575
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Mar;7(3):134-140
references.pmid: 12639695
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2010 Aug 11;30(32):10799-808
references.pmid: 20702709
references.citation: PLoS Comput Biol. 2008 Feb;4(2):e4
references.pmid: 18248087
references.citation: Exp Psychol. 2012;59(4):216-26
references.pmid: 22580405
references.citation: Emotion. 2010 Jun;10(3):324-34
references.pmid: 20515222
references.citation: Physiol Behav. 2009 Jul 14;97(5):551-60
references.pmid: 19328819
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2009 Jul 1;29(26):8388-95
references.pmid: 19571129
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2005 Dec;15(12):1855-65
references.pmid: 15746002
references.citation: Neuron. 2002 Oct 10;36(2):265-84
references.pmid: 12383781
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007 Dec;1121:254-72
references.pmid: 17872386
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2009 Apr 8;29(14):4531-41
references.pmid: 19357278