title: Effects of Bacillus subtilis natto and Different Components in Culture on Rumen Fermentation and Rumen Functional Bacteria In Vitro.
abstract: This study was to investigate the effects of live or autoclaved Bacillus subtilis natto, their fermented products and media on rumen fermentation and rumen functional bacteria in vitro. Rumen fluid from three multiparous lactating Holstein cows was combined and transferred into serum bottles after diluted. Fifteen serum bottles were divided into five treatments, which were designed as following: CTR (the fermentation of 0.5 g TMR and ruminal fluids from dairy cows), LBS (CTR plus a minimum of 10(11) cfu live Bacillus subtilis natto), ABS (CTR plus a minimum of 10(11) cfu autoclaved Bacillus subtilis natto), BSC (CTR plus 1 ml Bacillus subtilis natto fermentation products without bacteria), and BSM (CTR plus 1 ml liquid fermentation medium). When separated from the culture, live Bacillus subtilis natto individually increased the concentrations of ammonia-N (P < 0.01), MCP production (P < 0.01), and tended to elevate total VFA (P = 0.07), but decreased the ratio of acetate and propionate (P < 0.01). Autoclaved Bacillus subtilis natto has the similar function with the live bacteria except for the ratio of acetate and propionate. Except B. fibrisolvens, live or autoclaved Bacillus subtilis natto did not influence or decreased the 16S rRNA gene quantification of the detected bacteria. BSC and BSM altered the relative expression of certain functional bacteria in the rumen. These results indicated that it was Bacillus subtilis natto thalli that played the important role in promoting rumen fermentation when applied as a probiotic in dairy ration.
authors.affiliation: State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, No. 2 Yuanmingyuanxilu, Haidian District, Beijing, 100193, People's Republic of China.
authors.forename: Peng
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Sun
authors.affiliation: State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, No. 2 Yuanmingyuanxilu, Haidian District, Beijing, 100193, People's Republic of China.
authors.forename: Jinan
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Li
authors.affiliation: State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, No. 2 Yuanmingyuanxilu, Haidian District, Beijing, 100193, People's Republic of China. budengpan@126.com.|CAAS-ICRAF Joint Lab on Agroforestry and Sustainable Animal Husbandry, World Agroforestry Centre, East and Central Asia, Beijing, 100193, People's Republic of China. budengpan@126.com.|Synergetic Innovation Center of Food Safety and Nutrition, Harbin, 150030, People's Republic of China. budengpan@126.com.
authors.forename: Dengpan
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Bu
authors.affiliation: State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, No. 2 Yuanmingyuanxilu, Haidian District, Beijing, 100193, People's Republic of China.
authors.forename: Xuemei
authors.initials: X
authors.lastname: Nan
authors.affiliation: State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, No. 2 Yuanmingyuanxilu, Haidian District, Beijing, 100193, People's Republic of China.
authors.forename: Hong
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Du
mesh_terms: D000641:Ammonia / Q000378:metabolism; D000821:Animal Feed / Q000032:analysis*; D000818:Animals; D001412:Bacillus subtilis / Q000502:physiology*; D001419:Bacteria / Q000145:classification / Q000302:isolation & purification / Q000378:metabolism*; D002417:Cattle; D003470:Culture Media / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism; D005285:Fermentation; D019936:Probiotics / Q000008:administration & dosage; D012417:Rumen / Q000378:metabolism / Q000382:microbiology*
chemical_list: D003470:Culture Media; D000641:Ammonia
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002 May;68(5):2344-52
references.pmid: 11976107
references.citation: Mol Cell Probes. 1997 Aug;11(4):259-65
references.pmid: 9281411
references.citation: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007 May;75(1):165-74
references.pmid: 17235560
references.citation: J Dairy Sci. 2010 Dec;93(12):5851-5
references.pmid: 21094758
references.citation: J Biosci Bioeng. 2013 Jun;115(6):654-7
references.pmid: 23318248
references.citation: Methods. 2001 Dec;25(4):402-8
references.pmid: 11846609
references.citation: Vet Rec. 2005 Apr 2;156(14):447-8
references.pmid: 15828726
references.citation: Animal. 2013 Feb;7(2):216-22
references.pmid: 23031615
references.citation: Cell Mol Life Sci. 2002 Mar;59(3):410-6
references.pmid: 11964119
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2011 Dec;325(2):162-9
references.pmid: 22029887
references.citation: J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2012 Jun;96(3):506-12
references.pmid: 21635575
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2001 Nov 13;204(2):361-6
references.pmid: 11731149
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001 Jun;67(6):2766-74
references.pmid: 11375193
references.citation: J Dairy Sci. 1980 Jan;63(1):64-75
references.pmid: 7372898
references.citation: Poult Sci. 2009 Feb;88(2):309-15
references.pmid: 19151345
references.citation: Int J Food Microbiol. 2000 Nov 1;61(2-3):193-7
references.pmid: 11078170
references.citation: J Dairy Sci. 1991 Jun;74(6):1968-73
references.pmid: 1910057
references.citation: Eur J Immunol. 2007 Jun;37(6):1538-47
references.pmid: 17474150
references.citation: J Anim Sci. 2002 Jul;80(7):1977-85
references.pmid: 12162668
references.citation: Vet Res Commun. 2009 Dec;33(8):991-1001
references.pmid: 19763863
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2006 Dec;58(3):572-82
references.pmid: 17117998
references.citation: Animal. 2009 Nov;3(11):1562-9
references.pmid: 22444989
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2005 Sep;29(4):813-35
references.pmid: 16102604
references.citation: Br J Nutr. 1999 Feb;81(2):107-12
references.pmid: 10450327