title: Patient Vertical Centering and Correlation with Radiation Output in Adult Abdominopelvic CT.
abstract: The purpose of this study was to determine if there is a significant effect, independent of patient size, of patient vertical centering on the current-modulated CT scanner radiation output in adult abdominopelvic CT. A phantom was used to evaluate calculation of vertical positioning and effective diameter at five different table heights. In addition, 656 consecutive contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic scans using the same protocol and automatic tube current modulation settings on a Philips Brilliance 64 MDCT scanner were retrospectively evaluated. The vertical position of the patient center of mass and the average effective diameter of the scanned patient were computed using the reconstructed images. The average volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) for each scan was recorded. The mean patient center of mass y coordinate ranged from -3.7 to 6.7 cm (mean ± SD, 2.8 ± 1.2 cm), indicating that patients were on average positioned slightly below the scanner isocenter. There was a slight tendency for smaller patients to be mis-centered lower than larger patients. Average CTDIvol closely fit a quadratic regression curve with respect to mean effective diameter. However, the value of the regression coefficient relating CTDIvol to the patient's vertical position was nearly zero, indicating only a very slight increase in CTDIvol with patient mis-centering for the scanner used in this study. The techniques used here may be useful both for automated evaluation of proper patient positioning in CT and for estimating the radiation dose effects of patient mis-centering for any CT scanner.
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiology, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA, USA. phillip.cheng@med.usc.edu.|USC Norris Cancer Center and Hospital, 1441 Eastlake Avenue, Suite 2315B, Los Angeles, CA, 90033-0377, USA. phillip.cheng@med.usc.edu.
authors.forename: Phillip M
authors.identifier: 0000-0002-8559-7031
authors.initials: PM
authors.lastname: Cheng
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D049628:Body Size; D003287:Contrast Media; D004307:Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; D008297:Male; D056888:Patient Positioning / Q000379:methods*; D010388:Pelvis / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D019047:Phantoms, Imaging; D011829:Radiation Dosage; D011860:Radiography, Abdominal; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed
chemical_list: D003287:Contrast Media
keywords: Body imaging; Computed tomography; Image analysis; Quality control; Radiation dose
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Jul;203(1):123-30
references.pmid: 24951205
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 May;204(5):959-66
references.pmid: 25730157
references.citation: Phys Med. 2012 Jul;28(3):191-9
references.pmid: 21741870
references.citation: Radiology. 2011 May;259(2):311-6
references.pmid: 21502387
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Apr;192(4):862-5
references.pmid: 19304687
references.citation: Med Phys. 2007 Jul;34(7):3093-101
references.pmid: 17822016
references.citation: J Digit Imaging. 2013 Jun;26(3):406-11
references.pmid: 22955797
references.citation: Pediatr Radiol. 2013 Jun;43(6):673-84
references.pmid: 23341090
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Aug;203(2):377-86
references.pmid: 25055274
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007 Feb;188(2):547-52
references.pmid: 17242267