title: Interspecific interactions between wild felids vary across scales and levels of urbanization.
abstract: Ongoing global landscape change resulting from urbanization is increasingly linked to changes in species distributions and community interactions. However, relatively little is known about how urbanization influences competitive interactions among mammalian carnivores, particularly related to wild felids. We evaluated interspecific interactions between medium- and large-sized carnivores across a gradient of urbanization and multiple scales. Specifically, we investigated spatial and temporal interactions of bobcats and pumas by evaluating circadian activity patterns, broad-scale seasonal interactions, and fine-scale daily interactions in wildland-urban interface (WUI), exurban residential development, and wildland habitats. Across levels of urbanization, interspecific interactions were evaluated using two-species and single-species occupancy models with data from motion-activated cameras. As predicted, urbanization increased the opportunity for interspecific interactions between wild felids. Although pumas did not exclude bobcats from areas at broad spatial or temporal scales, bobcats responded behaviorally to the presence of pumas at finer scales, but patterns varied across levels of urbanization. In wildland habitat, bobcats avoided using areas for short temporal periods after a puma visited an area. In contrast, bobcats did not appear to avoid areas that pumas recently visited in landscapes influenced by urbanization (exurban development and WUI habitat). In addition, overlap in circadian activity patterns between bobcats and pumas increased in exurban development compared to wildland habitat. Across study areas, bobcats used sites less frequently as the number of puma photographs increased at a site. Overall, bobcats appear to shape their behavior at fine spatial and temporal scales to reduce encounters with pumas, but residential development can potentially alter these strategies and increase interaction opportunities. We explore three hypotheses to explain our results of how urbanization affected interspecific interactions that consider activity patterns, landscape configuration, and animal scent marking. Altered competitive interactions between animals in urbanized landscapes could potentially increase aggressive encounters and the frequency of disease transmission.
authors.affiliation: Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology Graduate Degree Program in Ecology Colorado State University Fort Collins Colorado 80523.
authors.forename: Jesse S
authors.initials: JS
authors.lastname: Lewis
authors.affiliation: Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology Graduate Degree Program in Ecology Colorado State University Fort Collins Colorado 80523.
authors.forename: Larissa L
authors.initials: LL
authors.lastname: Bailey
authors.affiliation: Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Pathology Colorado State University Fort Collins Colorado 80523.
authors.forename: Sue
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: VandeWoude
authors.affiliation: Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology Graduate Degree Program in Ecology Colorado State University Fort Collins Colorado 80523.
authors.forename: Kevin R
authors.initials: KR
authors.lastname: Crooks
keywords: Bobcat; Lynx rufus; Puma concolor; competition; detection probability; mountain lion; occupancy; residential development; species interactions; urban gradient
references.citation: Behav Processes. 2001 Aug 15;55(2):75-79
references.pmid: 11470499
references.citation: Science. 1960 Apr 29;131(3409):1292-7
references.pmid: 14399717
references.citation: Science. 2003 Nov 14;302(5648):1172-5
references.pmid: 14615528
references.citation: Am Nat. 2006 Apr;167(4):524-36
references.pmid: 16670995
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2006 Jun;15(7):1733-41
references.pmid: 16689893
references.citation: J Virol. 2007 Oct;81(20):10961-9
references.pmid: 17670835
references.citation: Science. 1974 Jul 5;185(4145):27-39
references.pmid: 17779277
references.citation: J Anim Ecol. 2007 Nov;76(6):1075-85
references.pmid: 17922704
references.citation: Ecol Appl. 2008 Jul;18(5):1119-39
references.pmid: 18686576
references.citation: Cornell Vet. 1991 Oct;81(4):357-64
references.pmid: 1954740
references.citation: Ecol Appl. 2010 Oct;20(7):2036-46
references.pmid: 21049888
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011;6(8):e23777
references.pmid: 21876770
references.citation: PLoS One. 2013 Apr 17;8(4):e60590
references.pmid: 23613732
references.citation: Ecol Appl. 2013 Apr;23(3):654-69
references.pmid: 23734492
references.citation: Ecol Appl. 2015 Oct;25(7):1880-95
references.pmid: 26591454
references.citation: Oecologia. 2001 Jan;126(1):134-141
references.pmid: 28547432
references.citation: Am Nat. 1999 May;153(5):492-508
references.pmid: 29578790
references.citation: Science. 1971 Feb 5;171(3970):443-9
references.pmid: 4992621