title: Testing a dynamic-field account of interactions between spatial attention and spatial working memory.
abstract: Studies examining the relationship between spatial attention and spatial working memory (SWM) have shown that discrimination responses are faster for targets appearing at locations that are being maintained in SWM, and that location memory is impaired when attention is withdrawn during the delay. These observations support the proposal that sustained attention is required for successful retention in SWM: If attention is withdrawn, memory representations are likely to fail, increasing errors. In the present study, this proposal was reexamined in light of a neural-process model of SWM. On the basis of the model's functioning, we propose an alternative explanation for the observed decline in SWM performance when a secondary task is performed during retention: SWM representations drift systematically toward the location of targets appearing during the delay. To test this explanation, participants completed a color discrimination task during the delay interval of a spatial-recall task. In the critical shifting-attention condition, the color stimulus could appear either toward or away from the midline reference axis, relative to the memorized location. We hypothesized that if shifting attention during the delay leads to the failure of SWM representations, there should be an increase in the variance of recall errors, but no change in directional errors, regardless of the direction of the shift. Conversely, if shifting attention induces drift of SWM representations-as predicted by the model-systematic changes in the patterns of spatial-recall errors should occur that would depend on the direction of the shift. The results were consistent with the latter possibility-recall errors were biased toward the locations of discrimination targets appearing during the delay.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology and Center for Visual and Cognitive Neuroscience, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, USA. jeffrey.s.johnson@ndsu.edu.|Department of Psychology, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND, 58102, USA. jeffrey.s.johnson@ndsu.edu.
authors.forename: Jeffrey S
authors.initials: JS
authors.lastname: Johnson
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology and Delta Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
authors.forename: John P
authors.initials: JP
authors.lastname: Spencer
mesh_terms: D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008570:Memory, Short-Term / Q000502:physiology*; D011939:Mental Recall / Q000502:physiology*; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology; D013028:Space Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D065852:Spatial Memory / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
keywords: Attention; Attention: Theoretical and computational models; Spatial memory
references.citation: Trends Neurosci. 2001 Aug;24(8):455-63
references.pmid: 11476885
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1997 Oct;23(5):1380-92
references.pmid: 9336958
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Feb 3;95(3):781-7
references.pmid: 9448241
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2007 Jul;114(3):599-631
references.pmid: 17638498
references.citation: Cognition. 2010 Apr;115(1):147-53
references.pmid: 20116784
references.citation: J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2014 Jan;9(1):144-7
references.pmid: 24982748
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2010 Aug;17(4):581-8
references.pmid: 20702881
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1998 Aug 29;353(1373):1257-70
references.pmid: 9770220
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1996 Jan;103(1):165-92
references.pmid: 8650297
references.citation: Biol Cybern. 1995 Jun;73(1):49-60
references.pmid: 7654850
references.citation: Biol Cybern. 1977 Aug 3;27(2):77-87
references.pmid: 911931
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Apr;32(2):473-90
references.pmid: 16634683
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 1992 Jan;20(1):12-20
references.pmid: 1549061
references.citation: Annu Rev Neurosci. 1995;18:193-222
references.pmid: 7605061
references.citation: Child Dev. 2003 Sep-Oct;74(5):1393-417
references.pmid: 14552405
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2005 Apr;15(4):431-47
references.pmid: 15749987
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 1996 Mar;125(1):96-108
references.pmid: 8851739
references.citation: Vision Res. 2001 Feb;41(3):329-41
references.pmid: 11164448
references.citation: Trends Neurosci. 2006 Jun;29(6):317-22
references.pmid: 16697058
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1992 Jan;99(1):122-49
references.pmid: 1546114
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1991 Jul;98(3):352-76
references.pmid: 1891523
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2012 Aug 15;32(33):11228-40
references.pmid: 22895707
references.citation: Vision Res. 2004 Mar;44(6):621-42
references.pmid: 14693189
references.citation: Q J Exp Psychol. 1980 Feb;32(1):3-25
references.pmid: 7367577
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001 Mar;2(3):194-203
references.pmid: 11256080
references.citation: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1997 Apr;7(2):255-61
references.pmid: 9142748
references.citation: New Ideas Psychol. 2008 Aug;26(2):227-251
references.pmid: 19173013
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1989 Jul;96(3):433-58
references.pmid: 2756067
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2011 Dec;22(12):1600-8
references.pmid: 22095974
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998 Jun;24(3):780-90
references.pmid: 9627416
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2003 May;13(5):527-40
references.pmid: 12679299
references.citation: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004 Jul;20(2):194-205
references.pmid: 15183391
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 1997 Jun;33(1):64-87
references.pmid: 9212722
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2003 Dec;13(12):1334-43
references.pmid: 14615298
references.citation: J Vis. 2014;14(11). pii: 9. doi: 10.1167/14.11.9
references.pmid: 25228628
references.citation: Eur J Neurosci. 2000 Jan;12(1):172-93
references.pmid: 10651872
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Feb;26(2):211-22
references.pmid: 24047380
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1989 Aug;15(3):448-56
references.pmid: 2527954
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 1980 Jan;12(1):97-136
references.pmid: 7351125
references.citation: Nature. 2003 Jan 30;421(6922):535-9
references.pmid: 12556893
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Apr 21;106(16):6802-7
references.pmid: 19339493
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 1989 Dec;118(4):387-98
references.pmid: 2531198
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2007 Aug;33(4):871-94
references.pmid: 17683234
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 1994 Jun;1(2):202-38
references.pmid: 24203471
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2012 Sep 19;32(38):12990-8
references.pmid: 22993416
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2000 Sep;10(9):910-23
references.pmid: 10982751
references.citation: Trends Neurosci. 1992 Jan;15(1):20-5
references.pmid: 1374953
references.citation: Vision Res. 2011 Jan;51(1):26-33
references.pmid: 20887745
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2002 Mar;131(1):16-37
references.pmid: 11900101
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2004 Jul;14(7):803-22
references.pmid: 15054055
references.citation: Neuron. 2007 Jul 19;55(2):301-12
references.pmid: 17640530
references.citation: J Comput Neurosci. 1998 Dec;5(4):383-405
references.pmid: 9877021
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2000 Sep;12(5):840-7
references.pmid: 11054925
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Dec;14(6):1066-71
references.pmid: 18229476
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Dec;35(6):1698-725
references.pmid: 19968430
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Feb;14(1):154-8
references.pmid: 17546746