title: Consensus on Surgical Management of Hallux Valgus from China.
abstract: Hallux valgus deformity is one of the most common diseases in foot and ankle surgery. Satisfactory outcomes tend to be achieved only through operative correction. However, selection of the optimal surgical strategy is always a controversial topic, and the rate of dissatisfied patients postoperativelyis still very high. It is well known that there are various pathological changes in hallux valgus deformity, so it is impossible to use one specific procedure to solve all the problems. It requires a careful preoperative physical examination and radiographic assessment to choose the best operation for each kind of deformity according to each pathalogical change, combined with good postoperative dressing, immobilization and proper rehabilitation and follow up, to improve surgical outcomes and reduce postoperative rate of complication and dissatisfaction. In order to achieve these goals, a Consensus on the Operative Correction of Hallux Valgus has been developed by the Foot and Ankle Working Committee, Orthopaedic Branch, Chinese Association of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Foot and ankle surgeons following this consensus must be fully aware of their patients' desires, carefully evaluate different pathological processes and clinical symptoms and be skilled in various procedures. Then these procedures can be easily selected, converted and combined based on preoperative plans and intraoperative conditions.
mesh_terms: D001174:Arthrodesis / Q000379:methods; D002681:China; D006215:Hallux Valgus / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000601:surgery*; D006801:Humans; D008683:Metatarsophalangeal Joint / Q000601:surgery; D010027:Osteotomy / Q000379:methods; D010808:Physical Examination / Q000379:methods; D011182:Postoperative Care / Q000379:methods; D011300:Preoperative Care / Q000379:methods
keywords: Consensus; Corrective operation; Hallux valgus
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000 Mar;82(3):322-41
references.pmid: 10724225
references.citation: JAMA. 2001 May 16;285(19):2474-80
references.pmid: 11368700
references.citation: Foot Ankle Int. 2001 Dec;22(12):970-6
references.pmid: 11783923
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1958 Oct;40-A(5):1058-62
references.pmid: 13587573
references.citation: Foot Ankle Int. 2005 Oct;26(10):783-92
references.pmid: 16221449
references.citation: Foot Ankle Int. 2007 May;28(5):537-41
references.pmid: 17559759
references.citation: Foot Ankle Int. 2007 May;28(5):642-4
references.pmid: 17559779
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Sep;89(9):1887-98
references.pmid: 17768183
references.citation: Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2008 May-Jun;37(3):127-37
references.pmid: 18436112
references.citation: Foot Ankle Int. 2008 May;29(5):468-72
references.pmid: 18510897
references.citation: Foot Ankle Surg. 2008;14(3):138-41
references.pmid: 19083631
references.citation: Foot Ankle Int. 2008 Dec;29(12):1209-15
references.pmid: 19138485
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Mar 1;91 Suppl 2 Pt 1:156-68
references.pmid: 19255208
references.citation: J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012 Jul-Aug;51(4):437-44
references.pmid: 22487651
references.citation: Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012 Oct;98(6):677-83
references.pmid: 22939107
references.citation: J Foot Ankle Surg. 2013 May-Jun;52(3):298-302
references.pmid: 23498970
references.citation: Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013 Jun;99(4):425-31
references.pmid: 23648316
references.citation: Int Orthop. 2013 Sep;37(9):1669-75
references.pmid: 23820756
references.citation: Foot Ankle Surg. 2013 Sep;19(3):155-61
references.pmid: 23830162
references.citation: Int Orthop. 2013 Sep;37(9):1771-80
references.pmid: 23884327
references.citation: Bone Joint J. 2013 Sep;95-B(9):1222-6
references.pmid: 23997136
references.citation: Med Clin North Am. 2014 Mar;98(2):227-32
references.pmid: 24559871
references.citation: J Surg Res. 2014 Jun 15;189(2):262-7
references.pmid: 24726058
references.citation: Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 1996 Jul;13(3):347-54
references.pmid: 8829031