title: Perforated Duodenal Ulcer: Has Anything Changed?
abstract: BACKGROUND
  To assess the current management and outcome of perforated duodenal peptic ulcer managed with open repair, a focused analysis was conducted, excluding gastric, traumatic and iatrogenic perforations.
  
  
  METHODS
  A retrospective study of a 6-year period identified 61 patients. Mean age was 59 (range 19-87) years and 33 (54%) were male. Medical history included nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in 46%, smoking in 30%, atherosclerosis in 26% and excessive alcohol use in 23%.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Generalized abdominal tenderness was recorded in 64% of the cases. The mean (SD) C-reactive protein value was 100 (141) g/l and white blood cell count was 12.8 (7.9) E9/l. Plain abdominal X-ray was positive for air in 87% (41/47) and CT scan in 86% (18/21). Four patients (7%) were operated without radiological imaging. There were 31 patients (51%) with a delay of 24 h or more from the start of symptoms to surgery. The mean (SD) delay from admission to surgery was 9 (3) (range 3-12) h. The treatment consisted of open suture repair in 92%, peritoneal lavage in 92%, external drainage in 80% and nasogastric decompression in 92%. The overall hospital mortality and morbidity rates were 11 and 21%, respectively. The duodenal suture leak rate was 7% and intra-abdominal abscess rate was 2%.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The majority of patients with perforated duodenal ulcer can be diagnosed with conventional clinical and radiological methods, and treated according to established surgical principles. The mortality and duodenal morbidity rates have remained unchanged for the last decade. Shortening preoperative delay could improve the prognosis.
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgery, Meilahti Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, HUS, Finland.
authors.forename: Selja
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Koskensalo
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgery, Meilahti Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, HUS, Finland. ari.leppaniemi@hus.fi.|Department of Surgery, Meilahti Hospital, University of Helsinki, Haartmaninkatu 4, 340, 00029, Helsinki, HUS, Finland. ari.leppaniemi@hus.fi.
authors.forename: Ari
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Leppäniemi
keywords: Emergency surgery; Peptic ulcer; Perforation; Peritonitis
references.citation: Scand J Surg. 2004;93(3):204-8
references.pmid: 15544075
references.citation: Surg Endosc. 2005 Dec;19(12):1565-71
references.pmid: 16211440
references.citation: Br J Surg. 2004 Aug;91(8):1046-54
references.pmid: 15286969
references.citation: World J Surg. 2000 Mar;24(3):277-83
references.pmid: 10658061
references.citation: World J Surg. 2003 Jul;27(7):782-7
references.pmid: 14509505
references.citation: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Oct 19;(4):CD004778
references.pmid: 16235381
references.citation: Ann Surg. 2002 Mar;235(3):313-9
references.pmid: 11882751
references.citation: World J Surg. 2008 Nov;32(11):2371-4
references.pmid: 18758854
references.citation: Scand J Gastroenterol. 2009;44(1):15-22
references.pmid: 18752147
references.citation: World J Surg. 2009 Jan;33(1):80-5
references.pmid: 18958520
references.citation: Crit Care Med. 2007 Feb;35(2):468-76
references.pmid: 17205025
references.citation: Br J Surg. 2005 Oct;92(10):1195-207
references.pmid: 16175515
references.citation: World J Surg. 2005 Oct;29(10):1299-310
references.pmid: 16132404
references.citation: Scand J Surg. 2007;96(3):184-96
references.pmid: 17966743
references.citation: World J Surg. 2009 Jul;33(7):1368-73
references.pmid: 19430829
references.citation: Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2007 Sep;392(5):581-5
references.pmid: 17687581
references.citation: Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2008 Jan;393(1):81-6
references.pmid: 17372753
references.citation: Ann Surg. 1996 Aug;224(2):131-8
references.pmid: 8757375
references.citation: World J Surg. 2008 Jul;32(7):1456-61
references.pmid: 18246388
references.citation: Ann Surg. 1994 Aug;220(2):168-75
references.pmid: 8053739
references.citation: JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2007 Jan-Mar;46(165):31-5
references.pmid: 17721560
references.citation: Arch Surg. 1996 Jun;131(6):641-5
references.pmid: 8645072