title: Pertrochanteric fractures: tips and tricks in nail osteosynthesis.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Intramedullary fixation of intertrochanteric fractures has become the standard method of fixation especially in unstable fracture types. Even though there have been developments on implant design and technology, the surgical technique of reduction and implant positioning remains the mandatory factor in treating these fractures successfully. The advantages of nailing in the mainly elderly patients sustaining intertrochanteric femur fractures are a short lever arm and a lateral support in the trochanter supplied by the nail. The disadvantages are that it is often harder to achieve a closed reduction of a displaced fracture and to maintain the reduction with the intramedullary implant.
  To obtain and maintain anatomic reduction and a secure fracture fixation, the surgical approach and fixation technique is of great importance. It starts with correct patient positioning, fracture reduction (accounting for varus dislocation and dislocation of flexed fragments), choosing the correct nail entry point and perfect lag screw positioning within the head-neck fragment and distal locking. To maintain the reduction achieved intraoperatively, the decision has to be made to use a cerclage wiring or to tolerate fracture gaps in the metaphyseal area. Intraoperative controlled compression of the neck or the subtrochanteric area is of great importance to reduce delayed unions or nonunions. Intramedullary fixation of unstable per-, inter- or subtrochanteric fractures shows biomechanical advantages compared to extramedullry fixation techniques. Even though there have been several amendments and developments of implants, a better implant does not compensate for an inadequate surgical approach or deficient surgical techniques which are paramount for successful treatment. When fixing fractures with intramedullary nailing systems, the surgeon should always try to achieve anatomic reduction and a perfect implant positioning to allow immediate full weight bearing without an increased risk of cut-out, non-union and implant failure.
authors.affiliation: Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany. aruecker@uke.de.
authors.forename: A H
authors.initials: AH
authors.lastname: Ruecker
authors.affiliation: Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistrasse 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.
authors.forename: J M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Rueger
keywords: Femur; Fixation; Fracture; Intertrochanteric
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996 Feb;(323):146-54
references.pmid: 8625572
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998 May;(350):56-61
references.pmid: 9602800
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1967 Sep-Oct;54:115-23
references.pmid: 5589594
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993 Sep;75(5):789-93
references.pmid: 8376441
references.citation: Acta Orthop Scand. 1994 Apr;65(2):127-30
references.pmid: 8197841
references.citation: Injury. 2002 Jan;33(1):23-8
references.pmid: 11879828
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 Mar;84-A(3):372-81
references.pmid: 11886906
references.citation: J Orthop Trauma. 2000 Jun-Jul;14 (5):324-8
references.pmid: 10926238
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976 Sep;58(6):866-72
references.pmid: 956232
references.citation: J Orthop Trauma. 1996;10 Suppl 1:v-ix, 1-154
references.pmid: 8814583
references.citation: J Trauma. 1999 Nov;47(5):942-5
references.pmid: 10568727
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Apr;90(4):700-7
references.pmid: 18381305
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995 Jul;77(7):1058-64
references.pmid: 7608228
references.citation: Acta Orthop Belg. 2002 Jun;68(3):251-7
references.pmid: 12152372
references.citation: Helv Chir Acta. 1992 Mar;58(5):697-703
references.pmid: 1592640
references.citation: Acta Orthop Scand. 2001 Jun;72(3):252-6
references.pmid: 11480600
references.citation: Injury. 1999 Jun;30(5):327-32
references.pmid: 10505125