title: Learner Perspectives of a Surgical Educators Faculty Development Program Regarding Value and Effectiveness: A Qualitative Study.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The BaylorScott & White Health Division of Plastic Surgery began a faculty development program designed to train clinicians to be better educators. The program consisted of presession reading, 11 small group didactic sessions, and individually chosen educational projects. Cross-discipline collaboration was pursued by enrolling faculty and students from diverse departments. Department chair permission was required for participation. The purpose of this qualitative study was to explore learner perspectives of the Surgical Educators Program.
  
  
  METHODS
  Fourteen physicians completed the Surgical Educators Program. Focus groups were held with the learners who completed the 2011 and 2012 programs 6 months after completion. The groups were moderated by an educational faculty member who was not involved in any aspect of the course. Questions were designed to elicit the components of the course curriculum of significance to the learners. Narrative data were digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim, and the investigators performed independent content analyses to identify themes. The data were thematically coded and summarized using calculation of frequencies.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Thirteen learners participated in the focus groups. Three main themes were identified. First, the program increased the participants' knowledge and practice of medical education. Second, the structure of the program was a key contributor to the outcomes. Third, the program produced a community of practice.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This study suggests that a faculty development program comprising a diverse group of physicians consisting of readings, guided small group sessions, and a mandatory project can train plastic surgical faculty to become better surgical educators within the constraints of a busy clinical practice.
authors.affiliation: Temple, Texas From the Division of Plastic Surgery, the Division of Hematology & Oncology, and the Department of Medical Education, BaylorScott & White Health, Texas A&M Health Science Center.
authors.forename: Robert A
authors.initials: RA
authors.lastname: Weber
authors.forename: Christian T
authors.initials: CT
authors.lastname: Cable
authors.forename: Hania
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Wehbe-Janek
mesh_terms: D003479:Curriculum; D004502:Education, Medical, Continuing / Q000458:organization & administration*; D005180:Faculty, Medical / Q000458:organization & administration*; D005260:Female; D017144:Focus Groups; D013502:General Surgery / Q000193:education; D006801:Humans; D007858:Learning; D008297:Male; D016730:Program Development; D015397:Program Evaluation; D036301:Qualitative Research; D011786:Quality Control; D066231:Surgeons / Q000193:education*; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires
references.citation: Wilkerson L, Irby DM. Strategies for improving teaching practices: A comprehensive approach to faculty development. Acad Med. 1998;73:387–396
references.citation: Weber RA, Armstrong EG. Teaching plastic surgeons how to be better teachers. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:1191–1197
references.citation: Steinert Y, Mann K, Centeno A, et al. A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to improve teaching effectiveness in medical education: BEME Guide No. 8. Med Teach. 2006;28:497–526
references.citation: Cable C, Knab M, Tham KY, Navedo DD, Armstrong E. Why are you here? Needs analysis of an interprofessional health-education graduate degree program. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2014;5:83–88
references.citation: Armstrong EG, Barsion SJ. Using an outcomes-logic-model approach to evaluate a faculty development program for medical educators. Acad Med. 2006;81:483–488
references.citation: Ranmuthugala G, Plumb JJ, Cunningham FC, Georgiou A, Westbrook JI, Braithwaite J. How and why are communities of practice established in the healthcare sector? A systematic review of the literature. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011;11:273–289