title: Analyzing Two-Phase Single-Case Data with Non-overlap and Mean Difference Indices: Illustration, Software Tools, and Alternatives.
abstract: Two-phase single-case designs, including baseline evaluation followed by an intervention, represent the most clinically straightforward option for combining professional practice and research. However, unless they are part of a multiple-baseline schedule, such designs do not allow demonstrating a causal relation between the intervention and the behavior. Although the statistical options reviewed here cannot help overcoming this methodological limitation, we aim to make practitioners and applied researchers aware of the available appropriate options for extracting maximum information from the data. In the current paper, we suggest that the evaluation of behavioral change should include visual and quantitative analyses, complementing the substantive criteria regarding the practical importance of the behavioral change. Specifically, we emphasize the need to use structured criteria for visual analysis, such as the ones summarized in the What Works Clearinghouse Standards, especially if such criteria are complemented by visual aids, as illustrated here. For quantitative analysis, we focus on the non-overlap of all pairs and the slope and level change procedure, as they offer straightforward information and have shown reasonable performance. An illustration is provided of the use of these three pieces of information: visual, quantitative, and substantive. To make the use of visual and quantitative analysis feasible, open source software is referred to and demonstrated. In order to provide practitioners and applied researchers with a more complete guide, several analytical alternatives are commented on pointing out the situations (aims, data patterns) for which these are potentially useful.
authors.affiliation: Departamento de Metodología de las Ciencias del Comportamiento, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Barcelona Barcelona, Spain.
authors.forename: Rumen
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Manolov
authors.affiliation: Departamento de Metodología de las Ciencias del Comportamiento, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad de Barcelona Barcelona, Spain.
authors.forename: José L
authors.initials: JL
authors.lastname: Losada
authors.affiliation: Psicología Experimental, Universidad de SevillaSeville, Spain; Universidad Autónoma de ChileSantiago, Chile.
authors.forename: Salvador
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Chacón-Moscoso
authors.affiliation: Psicología Experimental, Universidad de Sevilla Seville, Spain.
authors.forename: Susana
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Sanduvete-Chaves
keywords: data analysis; guidelines; methodological quality; non-experimental; single-case
references.citation: J Appl Behav Anal. 1974 Winter;7(4):647-53
references.pmid: 16795486
references.citation: J Sch Psychol. 2014 Apr;52(2):243-8
references.pmid: 24606979
references.citation: Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2014;24(3-4):332-48
references.pmid: 24286346
references.citation: Psychol Methods. 2010 Jun;15(2):124-44
references.pmid: 20515235
references.citation: Behav Res Ther. 1993 Nov;31(8):781-8
references.pmid: 8257410
references.citation: Behav Modif. 2014 Nov;38(6):878-913
references.pmid: 25092718
references.citation: Behav Ther. 2011 Sep;42(3):349-63
references.pmid: 21658519
references.citation: J Consult Clin Psychol. 1999 Jun;67(3):283-4
references.pmid: 10369048
references.citation: Front Psychol. 2014 Aug 12;5:887
references.pmid: 25161643
references.citation: J Sch Psychol. 2016 Jun;56:133-42
references.pmid: 27268573
references.citation: Behav Res Methods. 2009 May;41(2):372-84
references.pmid: 19363177
references.citation: Behav Processes. 2001 May 3;54(1-3):137-154
references.pmid: 11369466
references.citation: Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2014;24(3-4):419-44
references.pmid: 23957379
references.citation: Psychol Methods. 2012 Dec;17(4):510-50
references.pmid: 22845874
references.citation: Behav Modif. 2008 Nov;32(6):860-75
references.pmid: 18497425
references.citation: Multivariate Behav Res. 2015;50(2):162-83
references.pmid: 26609876
references.citation: J Consult Clin Psychol. 1991 Feb;59(1):12-9
references.pmid: 2002127
references.citation: Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2014;24(3-4):349-64
references.pmid: 24766443
references.citation: Behav Modif. 2010 May;34(3):195-218
references.pmid: 20234005
references.citation: Behav Modif. 2011 Jul;35(4):303-22
references.pmid: 21411481
references.citation: Multivariate Behav Res. 1985 Jan 1;20(1):27-44
references.pmid: 26776274
references.citation: Behav Modif. 2013 Jan;37(1):62-89
references.pmid: 22977266
references.citation: Psychol Methods. 2000 Mar;5(1):87-101
references.pmid: 10937324
references.citation: Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2015;25(5):637-62
references.pmid: 26214248
references.citation: Behav Modif. 2006 Sep;30(5):531-63
references.pmid: 16894229
references.citation: Am Psychol. 2006 May-Jun;61(4):271-85
references.pmid: 16719673
references.citation: J Sch Psychol. 2014 Apr;52(2):213-30
references.pmid: 24606976
references.citation: Behav Res Ther. 1993 Jul;31(6):621-31
references.pmid: 7880208
references.citation: J Appl Behav Anal. 1982 Fall;15(3):423-9
references.pmid: 7142062
references.citation: Behav Ther. 2011 Jun;42(2):284-99
references.pmid: 21496513
references.citation: Neuropsychol Rev. 2006 Dec;16(4):161-9
references.pmid: 17151940
references.citation: Behav Modif. 2014 Sep;38(5):665-704
references.pmid: 24902590
references.citation: J Sch Psychol. 2014 Apr;52(2):123-47
references.pmid: 24606972
references.citation: Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2014;24(3-4):445-63
references.pmid: 23883189
references.citation: Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2014;24(3-4):464-91
references.pmid: 24499350
references.citation: Front Psychol. 2013 Dec 06;4:911
references.pmid: 24367345
references.citation: NeuroRehabilitation. 2014 Jan 1;35(2):261-70
references.pmid: 24990031
references.citation: Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2014;24(3-4):492-506
references.pmid: 24641472
references.citation: J Sch Psychol. 2012 Oct;50(5):599-624
references.pmid: 23040759
references.citation: Behav Ther. 2006 Dec;37(4):326-38
references.pmid: 17071211
references.citation: J Consult Clin Psychol. 1999 Jun;67(3):332-9
references.pmid: 10369053
references.citation: J Appl Behav Anal. 2003 Fall;36(3):387-406
references.pmid: 14596583
references.citation: Behav Ther. 2009 Dec;40(4):357-67
references.pmid: 19892081
references.citation: Behav Modif. 2015 Jul;39(4):510-41
references.pmid: 25878161
references.citation: J Sch Psychol. 2014 Apr;52(2):191-211
references.pmid: 24606975
references.citation: Behav Res Methods. 2006 Aug;38(3):372-81
references.pmid: 17186746
references.citation: Cogn Behav Pract. 2009 Nov 1;16(4):468-477
references.pmid: 20428470
references.citation: Perspect Psychol Sci. 2012 Nov;7(6):528-30
references.pmid: 26168108
references.citation: Fam Process. 1985 Mar;24(1):69-77
references.pmid: 3987884
references.citation: Behav Modif. 2008 Nov;32(6):828-39
references.pmid: 18490266
references.citation: Front Psychol. 2014 Aug 12;5:771
references.pmid: 25161629
references.citation: Behav Ther. 2011 Sep;42(3):533-45
references.pmid: 21658534
references.citation: Ment Retard. 1990 Oct;28(5):283-90
references.pmid: 2147734
references.citation: J Consult Clin Psychol. 1978 Aug;46(4):629-42
references.pmid: 670512
references.citation: Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2013;23(5):619-38
references.pmid: 24050810
references.citation: J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2008 Jan;37(1):215-37
references.pmid: 18444059
references.citation: Span J Psychol. 2009 Nov;12(2):823-32
references.pmid: 19899683