title: Current perspectives on China's national essential medicine system: primary care provider and patient views.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The National Essential Medicine System (NEMS) is a new policy launched by the Chinese government in 2009. The effects of its introduction have been widely investigated. However, little research has focused on individual patients' perspectives. The purpose of this study was to examine current understanding and opinions of China's NEMS of primary care providers (PCPs) and patients.
  
  
  METHODS
  Providers (n = 134) and patients (n = 175) were examined based on self-completed questionnaire surveys conducted in 16 primary healthcare centers in Ningxia, northwestern China. Questions addressed the topics of: participants' socio-demographic characteristics; awareness of NEMS policies; perceptions of NEMS-related changes; satisfactions with NEMS.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The patients had a low awareness of NEMS while a majority of providers were familiar with NEMS. All participants were satisfied with the price and quality of essential medicines, but not satisfied with the quantity. Patients felt there had been a decrease in their total medical expenses per visit and improved pharmaceutical services. Most providers perceived no change in their personal or departmental income. The overall satisfaction rate related to NEMS among providers and patients was 92.54 and 93.31%, respectively. Overall there was a link between knowledge about NEMS and satisfaction with the program: patients who had greater knowledge of reimbursement policy, and the providers with greater knowledge of NEMS, reported higher satisfaction.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The findings revealed a high level of satisfaction towards NEMS among primary care providers and patients, which is a reflection of the improvements in the health care system. However, some patients' low awareness of NEMS should be paid attention to, as it could reduce their knowledge of essential medicines and hinder the full potential of NEMS.
authors.affiliation: Shandong Institute of Medicine and Health Information, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, 18877 Jingshi Lu, Jinan, Shandong Province, China.|State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Medical Sciences, University of Macau, Avenida da Universidade, Taipa, Macau, China.
authors.forename: Yan
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Song
authors.affiliation: State Key Laboratory of Quality Research in Chinese Medicine, Institute of Chinese Medical Sciences, University of Macau, Avenida da Universidade, Taipa, Macau, China. bianying@umac.mo.
authors.forename: Ying
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Bian
authors.affiliation: College of Management, Ningxia Medical University, 1160 Shengli Street, Yinchuan, Ningxia Province, China.
authors.forename: Lingui
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Li
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D002681:China; D003695:Delivery of Health Care; D018954:Drugs, Essential; D005260:Female; D007722:Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; D006282:Health Personnel / Q000523:psychology*; D006801:Humans; D007182:Income; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010361:Patients / Q000523:psychology*; D011320:Primary Health Care; D012456:Salaries and Fringe Benefits; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires
chemical_list: D018954:Drugs, Essential
references.citation: BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:507
references.pmid: 25344413
references.citation: J Pharm Policy Pract. 2014 Sep 17;7(1):12
references.pmid: 25317336
references.citation: J Med Econ. 2013;16(2):289-94
references.pmid: 23215958
references.citation: Health Aff (Millwood). 2012 May;31(5):1075-82
references.pmid: 22566449
references.citation: Health Policy. 2009 Apr;90(1):32-6
references.pmid: 18849089
references.citation: J Public Health Policy. 2011 Aug;32(3):305-19
references.pmid: 21614030
references.citation: Bull World Health Organ. 2002;80(11):913-4
references.pmid: 12481216
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2013 Sep;93:220-8
references.pmid: 23103350