title: Asymmetric intergroup bullying: The enactment and maintenance of societal inequality at work.
abstract: What does inequality mean for dysfunctional organizational behaviours, such as workplace bullying? This article argues that workplace bullying can be understood as a manifestation of intergroup dynamics originating beyond the organization. We introduce the construct of asymmetric intergroup bullying: the disproportionate mistreatment of members of low status groups, with the intended effect of enhancing the subordination of that group in society at large. Analysis of data from 38 interviews with public and private sector workers in Turkey depicts a pattern of asymmetric intergroup bullying, undertaken to achieve organizational and broader sociopolitical goals. Respondents reported bullying acts used to get rid of unwanted personnel, with the goal of avoiding severance pay, or of removing supporters of the former government from positions of political and economic influence. Bullying was also described as working towards the dominance of the sociocultural worldview of one political group over another. We discuss asymmetric intergroup bullying as one mechanism through which acute intergroup hierarchy in the broader society corrupts management practice and employee interactions, in turn exacerbating economic inequality along group lines.
authors.affiliation: Middlesex University, UK, s.soylu@mdx.ac.uk.
authors.forename: Soydan
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Soylu
authors.affiliation: Harvard University, USA, jsheehy@fas.harvard.edu.
authors.forename: Jennifer
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Sheehy-Skeffington
keywords: Turkey; bullying; inequality; intergroup relations; management; qualitative; social dominance theory; workplace
references.citation: J Occup Health Psychol. 2001 Jan;6(1):64-80
references.pmid: 11199258
references.citation: BMJ. 2003 Apr 12;326(7393):776-7
references.pmid: 12689952
references.citation: Scand J Psychol. 2007 Aug;48(4):313-9
references.pmid: 17669221
references.citation: J Appl Psychol. 2008 Jan;93(1):95-107
references.pmid: 18211138