title: A Critical Analysis of the 2012 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Provider Use and Payment Database.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  On April 9, 2014, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services released 10 million billing records of over 880,000 physicians and other health care providers and accounts for over $1 billion in Medicare payments distributed in 2012. This action was part of an effort to improve the transparency, accountability, and affordability of the U.S. health care system. This study was performed to mine this unprecedented data set to delineate patterns of billing and reimbursement for plastic surgeons.
  
  
  METHODS
  The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Provider Utilization and Payment Database was accessed to analyze 2012 plastic surgery claims data with respect to providers and beneficiaries, services, and reimbursements. Pivot tables and other methods were used by means of Microsoft Excel.
  
  
  RESULTS
  In 2012, a total of $133,472,772 was distributed to 3726 plastic surgery physician providers for 735 unique Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System codes for 1,399,404 procedure claims. Of specialty care, plastic surgery ranks twenty-sixth among 29 subspecialties for total Medicare payments. The average plastic surgeon was paid $35,821.58 by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services in 2012. Forty-six percent of plastic surgeons did not receive reimbursement for services from Medicare.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The release of an enormous amount of provider level claims data by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services may serve as a new tool for locating potential fraud, pinpointing needs, and assessing levels of growth in care. Plastic surgeons need to understand implications of changes to Medicare, which will likely affect patient mix, physician documentation, billing, coding, reimbursement, and active participation in quality reporting.
authors.affiliation: Lexington, Ky. From the Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky College of Medicine.
authors.forename: Krishna S
authors.initials: KS
authors.lastname: Vyas
authors.forename: William K
authors.initials: WK
authors.lastname: Snapp
authors.forename: Brian D
authors.initials: BD
authors.lastname: Rinker
authors.forename: Henry C
authors.initials: HC
authors.lastname: Vasconez
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D014487:Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. / Q000191:economics* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D016208:Databases, Factual; D005260:Female; D005102:Health Expenditures; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D014481:United States
references.citation: Brennan N, Conway PH, Tavenner M. The Medicare physician-data release: Context and rationale. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:99–101
references.citation: O’Gara PT. Caution advised: Medicare’s physician-payment data release. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:101–103
references.citation: Albornoz CR, Cordeiro PG, Mehrara BJ, et al. Economic implications of recent trends in U.S. immediate autologous breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;133:463–470
references.citation: Alderman AK, Atisha D, Streu R, et al. Patterns and correlates of postmastectomy breast reconstruction by U.S. plastic surgeons: Results from a national survey. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:1796–1803
references.citation: Sando IC, Chung KC, Kidwell KM, Kozlow JH, Malay S, Momoh AO. Comprehensive breast reconstruction in an academic surgical practice: An evaluation of the financial impact. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014;134:1131–1139
references.citation: Hu ES, Pusic AL, Waljee JF, et al. Patient-reported aesthetic satisfaction with breast reconstruction during the long-term survivorship period. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:1–8
references.citation: Yueh JH, Slavin SA, Adesiyun T, et al. Patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction: A comparative evaluation of DIEP, TRAM, latissimus flap, and implant techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:1585–1595
references.citation: Blumenthal D, Davis K, Guterman S. Medicare at 50: Origins and evolution. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:479–486
references.citation: Camp MC, Wong WW, Wong RY, Camp JS, Son AK, Gupta SC. Who is providing aesthetic surgery? A detailed examination of the geographic distribution and training backgrounds of cosmetic practitioners in Southern California. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:1257–1262
references.citation: Barr JS, Sinno S, Cimino M, Saadeh PB. Clinicians performing cosmetic surgery in the community: A nationwide analysis of physician certification. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135:92e–98e