title: Using the mouse to model human disease: increasing validity and reproducibility.
abstract: Experiments that use the mouse as a model for disease have recently come under scrutiny because of the repeated failure of data, particularly derived from preclinical studies, to be replicated or translated to humans. The usefulness of mouse models has been questioned because of irreproducibility and poor recapitulation of human conditions. Newer studies, however, point to bias in reporting results and improper data analysis as key factors that limit reproducibility and validity of preclinical mouse research. Inaccurate and incomplete descriptions of experimental conditions also contribute. Here, we provide guidance on best practice in mouse experimentation, focusing on appropriate selection and validation of the model, sources of variation and their influence on phenotypic outcomes, minimum requirements for control sets, and the importance of rigorous statistics. Our goal is to raise the standards in mouse disease modeling to enhance reproducibility, reliability and clinical translation of findings.
authors.affiliation: Hospital for Sick Children, The Peter Gilgan Centre for Research and Learning, SickKids Research Institute, 686 Bay St, 14.9716, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5G 0A4 monica.justice@sickkids.ca.
authors.forename: Monica J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Justice
authors.affiliation: Disease Models & Mechanisms, The Company of Biologists, Bidder Building, Station Road, Histon, Cambridge CB24 9LF, UK.
authors.forename: Paraminder
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Dhillon
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D006801:Humans; D051379:Mice; D004195:Disease Models, Animal
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Feb 26;110(9):3507-12
references.pmid: 23401516
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2012 Aug 1;32(31):10574-86
references.pmid: 22855807
references.citation: Dis Model Mech. 2013 Nov;6(6):1459-69
references.pmid: 23929941
references.citation: Nature. 2014 Jan 30;505(7485):612-3
references.pmid: 24482835
references.citation: Nature. 2014 Mar 27;507(7493):423-5
references.pmid: 24678540
references.citation: Genome Biol. 2013;14(7):R82
references.pmid: 23902802
references.citation: Brain Res. 2014 Oct 10;1584:59-72
references.pmid: 24141148
references.citation: Dis Model Mech. 2015 Jan;8(1):1-16
references.pmid: 25561744
references.citation: Nat Cell Biol. 2007 Sep;9(9):993-9
references.pmid: 17762889
references.citation: Nat Genet. 1997 May;16(1):19-27
references.pmid: 9140391
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jan 27;112(4):1167-72
references.pmid: 25092317
references.citation: Can Vet J. 2009 May;50(5):523-30
references.pmid: 19436640
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Nov 3;106(44):18809-14
references.pmid: 19833869
references.citation: PLoS Biol. 2010;8(6):e1000412
references.pmid: 20613859
references.citation: Dis Model Mech. 2013 Nov;6(6):1470-6
references.pmid: 23929940