title: Evaluation of conventional imaging performance in a research whole-body CT system with a photon-counting detector array.
abstract: This study evaluated the conventional imaging performance of a research whole-body photon-counting CT system and investigated its feasibility for imaging using clinically realistic levels of x-ray photon flux. This research system was built on the platform of a 2nd generation dual-source CT system: one source coupled to an energy integrating detector (EID) and the other coupled to a photon-counting detector (PCD). Phantom studies were conducted to measure CT number accuracy and uniformity for water, CT number energy dependency for high-Z materials, spatial resolution, noise, and contrast-to-noise ratio. The results from the EID and PCD subsystems were compared. The impact of high photon flux, such as pulse pile-up, was assessed by studying the noise-to-tube-current relationship using a neonate water phantom and high x-ray photon flux. Finally, clinical feasibility of the PCD subsystem was investigated using anthropomorphic phantoms, a cadaveric head, and a whole-body cadaver, which were scanned at dose levels equivalent to or higher than those used clinically. Phantom measurements demonstrated that the PCD subsystem provided comparable image quality to the EID subsystem, except that the PCD subsystem provided slightly better longitudinal spatial resolution and about 25% improvement in contrast-to-noise ratio for iodine. The impact of high photon flux was found to be negligible for the PCD subsystem: only subtle high-flux effects were noticed for tube currents higher than 300 mA in images of the neonate water phantom. Results of the anthropomorphic phantom and cadaver scans demonstrated comparable image quality between the EID and PCD subsystems. There were no noticeable ring, streaking, or cupping/capping artifacts in the PCD images. In addition, the PCD subsystem provided spectral information. Our experiments demonstrated that the research whole-body photon-counting CT system is capable of providing clinical image quality at clinically realistic levels of x-ray photon flux.
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic; Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, USA.
authors.forename: Zhicong
authors.initials: Z
authors.lastname: Yu
authors.forename: Shuai
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Leng
authors.forename: Steven M
authors.initials: SM
authors.lastname: Jorgensen
authors.forename: Zhoubo
authors.initials: Z
authors.lastname: Li
authors.forename: Ralf
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Gutjahr
authors.forename: Baiyu
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Chen
authors.forename: Ahmed F
authors.initials: AF
authors.lastname: Halaweish
authors.forename: Steffen
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Kappler
authors.forename: Lifeng
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Yu
authors.forename: Erik L
authors.initials: EL
authors.lastname: Ritman
authors.forename: Cynthia H
authors.initials: CH
authors.lastname: McCollough
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D019047:Phantoms, Imaging; D017785:Photons; D011874:Radiometry / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D014965:X-Rays
references.citation: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2014 Feb;61(2):246-53
references.pmid: 23996533
references.citation: Med Phys. 2013 May;40(5):051905
references.pmid: 23635275
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 2012 Mar 21;57(6):1595-615
references.pmid: 22398007
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 2011 Apr 7;56(7):1905-30
references.pmid: 21364268
references.citation: Med Phys. 2015 Jul;42(7):4349-66
references.pmid: 26133632
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 2014 Nov 21;59(22):6709-27
references.pmid: 25327497
references.citation: Radiology. 2015 Sep;276(3):637-53
references.pmid: 26302388
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 2008 Aug 7;53(15):4031-47
references.pmid: 18612175
references.citation: IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2009;56(3):535-542
references.pmid: 19920884
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 2008 Mar 7;53(5):1475-95
references.pmid: 18296774
references.citation: Br J Radiol. 1973 Dec;46(552):1016-22
references.pmid: 4757352
references.citation: Med Phys. 2005 Aug;32(8):2536-47
references.pmid: 16193784
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 1976 Sep;21(5):733-44
references.pmid: 967922
references.citation: Med Phys. 2009 Nov;36(11):5107-19
references.pmid: 19994521
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 2008 Oct 21;53(20):5595-613
references.pmid: 18799830
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Nov;199(5 Suppl):S3-8
references.pmid: 23097165
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 2015 Feb 21;60(4):1583-600
references.pmid: 25615511
references.citation: Med Phys. 2004 Sep;31(9):2423-42
references.pmid: 15487722
references.citation: Eur Radiol. 2006 Feb;16(2):256-68
references.pmid: 16341833
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 2015 Mar 21;60(6):2453-74
references.pmid: 25739788
references.citation: Med Phys. 2002 Nov;29(11):2655-71
references.pmid: 12462733
references.citation: Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2015;9412:null
references.pmid: 26097280
references.citation: Med Phys. 2013 Oct;40(10):100901
references.pmid: 24089889
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 2014 Oct 21;59(20):6195-213
references.pmid: 25255737
references.citation: Med Phys. 2011 Jul;38(7):4265-75
references.pmid: 21859028
references.citation: Med Phys. 2004 Sep;31(9):2699-706
references.pmid: 15487753
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 2004 Jun 7;49(11):2209-18
references.pmid: 15248573
references.citation: Med Phys. 2000 Aug;27(8):1915-9
references.pmid: 10984237