title: Policy impacts of ecosystem services knowledge.
abstract: Research about ecosystem services (ES) often aims to generate knowledge that influences policies and institutions for conservation and human development. However, we have limited understanding of how decision-makers use ES knowledge or what factors facilitate use. Here we address this gap and report on, to our knowledge, the first quantitative analysis of the factors and conditions that explain the policy impact of ES knowledge. We analyze a global sample of cases where similar ES knowledge was generated and applied to decision-making. We first test whether attributes of ES knowledge themselves predict different measures of impact on decisions. We find that legitimacy of knowledge is more often associated with impact than either the credibility or salience of the knowledge. We also examine whether predictor variables related to the science-to-policy process and the contextual conditions of a case are significant in predicting impact. Our findings indicate that, although many factors are important, attributes of the knowledge and aspects of the science-to-policy process that enhance legitimacy best explain the impact of ES science on decision-making. Our results are consistent with both theory and previous qualitative assessments in suggesting that the attributes and perceptions of scientific knowledge and process within which knowledge is coproduced are important determinants of whether that knowledge leads to action.
authors.affiliation: Gund Institute for Ecological Economics, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405; Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405; sposner@uvm.edu.
authors.forename: Stephen M
authors.initials: SM
authors.lastname: Posner
authors.affiliation: WWF-UK, Washington, DC 20037; The Natural Capital Project, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305; WWF-UK, The Living Planet Centre, Surrey GU21 4LL, United Kingdom.
authors.forename: Emily
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: McKenzie
authors.affiliation: Gund Institute for Ecological Economics, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405; Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405;
authors.forename: Taylor H
authors.initials: TH
authors.lastname: Ricketts
mesh_terms: D003247:Conservation of Natural Resources; D017753:Ecosystem
keywords: boundary organizations; conservation; ecosystem services; knowledge systems; science policy interface
references.citation: Conserv Biol. 2008 Jun;22(3):610-7
references.pmid: 18477033
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Jul 15;105(28):9455-6
references.pmid: 18621697
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010 Jan;1185:54-78
references.pmid: 20146762
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Apr 26;113(17):4579-84
references.pmid: 19887640
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Aug 23;108(34):13913-8
references.pmid: 21873177
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005 Feb 28;360(1454):471-7
references.pmid: 15814358
references.citation: J Environ Manage. 2013 Apr 15;119:208-19
references.pmid: 23500023
references.citation: Conserv Biol. 2013 Aug;27(4):669-78
references.pmid: 23574343
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Jun 16;112(24):7390-5
references.pmid: 26082545
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Mar 29;108(13):5308-12
references.pmid: 21402916
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jul 8;100(14):8086-91
references.pmid: 12777623
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011;6(11):e27537
references.pmid: 22110667