title: NEAT: a framework for building fully automated NGS pipelines and analyses.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The analysis of next generation sequencing (NGS) has become a standard task for many laboratories in the life sciences. Though there exists several tools to support users in the manipulation of such datasets on various levels, few are built on the basis of vertical integration. Here, we present the NExt generation Analysis Toolbox (NEAT) that allows non-expert users including wet-lab scientists to comprehensively build, run and analyze NGS data through double-clickable executables without the need of any programming experience.
  
  
  RESULTS
  In comparison to many publicly available tools including Galaxy, NEAT provides three main advantages: (1) Through the development of double-clickable executables, NEAT is efficient (completes within <24 hours), easy to implement and intuitive; (2) Storage space, maximum number of job submissions, wall time and cluster-specific parameters can be customized as NEAT is run on the institution's cluster; (3) NEAT allows users to visualize and summarize NGS data rapidly and efficiently using various built-in exploratory data analysis tools including metagenomic and differentially expressed gene analysis. To simplify the control of the workflow, NEAT projects are built around a unique and centralized file containing sample names, replicates, conditions, antibodies, alignment-, filtering- and peak calling parameters as well as cluster-specific paths and settings. Moreover, the small-sized files produced by NEAT allow users to easily manipulate, consolidate and share datasets from different users and institutions.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  NEAT provides biologists and bioinformaticians with a robust, efficient and comprehensive tool for the analysis of massive NGS datasets. Frameworks such as NEAT not only allow novice users to overcome the increasing number of technical hurdles due to the complexity of manipulating large datasets, but provide more advance users with tools that ensure high reproducibility standards in the NGS era. NEAT is publically available at https://github.com/pschorderet/NEAT.
authors.affiliation: Department of Molecular Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. patrick.schorderet@molbio.mgh.harvard.edu.|Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. patrick.schorderet@molbio.mgh.harvard.edu.
authors.forename: Patrick
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Schorderet
mesh_terms: D019295:Computational Biology / Q000379:methods*; D057225:Data Mining; D015894:Genome, Human; D023281:Genomics / Q000379:methods*; D059014:High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D056186:Metagenomics; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012984:Software; D059467:Transcriptome; D057188:Workflow
references.citation: Nat Biotechnol. 2008 Dec;26(12):1351-9
references.pmid: 19029915
references.citation: Cell Rep. 2014 Nov 6;9(3):1163-70
references.pmid: 25437568
references.citation: Genome Biol. 2010;11(8):R86
references.pmid: 20738864
references.citation: Genome Biol. 2010;11(5):207
references.pmid: 20441614
references.citation: BMC Bioinformatics. 2009;10:48
references.pmid: 19192299
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2011 Nov 1;27(21):2987-93
references.pmid: 21903627
references.citation: Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2015 Jan 1;4(1):50-58
references.pmid: 25566414
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2009 May 1;25(9):1105-11
references.pmid: 19289445
references.citation: Genome Res. 2002 Jun;12(6):996-1006
references.pmid: 12045153
references.citation: Brief Bioinform. 2013 Mar;14(2):178-92
references.pmid: 22517427
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2009 Aug 15;25(16):2078-9
references.pmid: 19505943
references.citation: Genome Biol. 2004;5(10):R80
references.pmid: 15461798
references.citation: Genome Biol. 2008;9(9):R137
references.pmid: 18798982
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Jan;41(Database issue):D48-55
references.pmid: 23203987
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2010 Mar 15;26(6):841-2
references.pmid: 20110278
references.citation: Nat Biotechnol. 2011 Jan;29(1):24-6
references.pmid: 21221095
references.citation: Genome Biol. 2009;10(3):R25
references.pmid: 19261174
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 2011 Jan;39(Database issue):D871-5
references.pmid: 21037257
references.citation: Nature. 2009 Jun 18;459(7249):927-30
references.pmid: 19536255
references.citation: Genome Res. 2005 Oct;15(10):1451-5
references.pmid: 16169926
references.citation: Brief Bioinform. 2013 Mar;14(2):144-61
references.pmid: 22908213
references.citation: Nat Methods. 2012 Nov;9(11):1046
references.pmid: 23281567
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2009 Jul 15;25(14):1754-60
references.pmid: 19451168
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 2012 Jan;40(Database issue):D54-6
references.pmid: 22009675
references.citation: Genome Biol. 2011;12(8):125
references.pmid: 21867570
references.citation: PLoS Comput Biol. 2007 Mar 23;3(3):e39
references.pmid: 17381235
references.citation: PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e85879
references.pmid: 24475057