title: The SOS Response Master Regulator LexA Regulates the Gene Transfer Agent of Rhodobacter capsulatus and Represses Transcription of the Signal Transduction Protein CckA.
abstract: The gene transfer agent of Rhodobacter capsulatus (RcGTA) is a genetic exchange element that combines central aspects of bacteriophage-mediated transduction and natural transformation. RcGTA particles resemble a small double-stranded DNA bacteriophage, package random ∼4-kb fragments of the producing cell genome, and are released from a subpopulation (<1%) of cells in a stationary-phase culture. RcGTA particles deliver this DNA to surrounding R. capsulatus cells, and the DNA is integrated into the recipient genome though a process that requires homologs of natural transformation genes and RecA-mediated homologous recombination. Here, we report the identification of the LexA repressor, the master regulator of the SOS response in many bacteria, as a regulator of RcGTA activity. Deletion of the lexA gene resulted in the abolition of detectable RcGTA production and an ∼10-fold reduction in recipient capability. A search for SOS box sequences in the R. capsulatus genome sequence identified a number of putative binding sites located 5' of typical SOS response coding sequences and also 5' of the RcGTA regulatory gene cckA, which encodes a hybrid histidine kinase homolog. Expression of cckA was increased >5-fold in the lexA mutant, and a lexA cckA double mutant was found to have the same phenotype as a ΔcckA single mutant in terms of RcGTA production. The data indicate that LexA is required for RcGTA production and maximal recipient capability and that the RcGTA-deficient phenotype of the lexA mutant is largely due to the overexpression of cckA.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  This work describes an unusual phenotype of a lexA mutant of the alphaproteobacterium Rhodobacter capsulatus in respect to the phage transduction-like genetic exchange carried out by the R. capsulatus gene transfer agent (RcGTA). Instead of the expected SOS response characteristic of prophage induction, this lexA mutation not only abolishes the production of RcGTA particles but also impairs the ability of cells to receive RcGTA-borne genes. The data show that, despite an apparent evolutionary relationship to lambdoid phages, the regulation of RcGTA gene expression differs radically.
authors.affiliation: Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
authors.forename: Kevin S
authors.initials: KS
authors.lastname: Kuchinski
authors.affiliation: Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
authors.forename: Cedric A
authors.initials: CA
authors.lastname: Brimacombe
authors.affiliation: Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
authors.forename: Alexander B
authors.initials: AB
authors.lastname: Westbye
authors.affiliation: Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
authors.forename: Hao
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Ding
authors.affiliation: Department of Microbiology and Immunology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada j.beatty@ubc.ca.
authors.forename: J Thomas
authors.initials: JT
authors.lastname: Beatty
mesh_terms: D001426:Bacterial Proteins / Q000235:genetics / Q000378:metabolism*; D001483:Base Sequence; D015964:Gene Expression Regulation, Bacterial / Q000502:physiology*; D008969:Molecular Sequence Data; D009154:Mutation; D010766:Phosphorylation; D016354:Rhodobacter capsulatus / Q000166:cytology / Q000235:genetics / Q000378:metabolism*; D013014:SOS Response, Genetics / Q000502:physiology*; D012697:Serine Endopeptidases / Q000235:genetics / Q000378:metabolism*; D015398:Signal Transduction / Q000502:physiology; D014158:Transcription, Genetic / Q000502:physiology*; D000099160:LexA Repressor Protein
chemical_list: D001426:Bacterial Proteins; D012697:Serine Endopeptidases; D000099160:LexA Repressor Protein
references.citation: Mol Microbiol. 2012 Jul;85(2):314-25
references.pmid: 22640804
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2007 Nov;31(6):637-56
references.pmid: 17883408
references.citation: Genome Announc. 2014 Feb 13;2(1):null
references.pmid: 24526637
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 1981 Nov;148(2):584-93
references.pmid: 7298578
references.citation: PLoS Pathog. 2013;9(11):e1003711
references.pmid: 24244154
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Jul;81(14):4490-4
references.pmid: 6087326
references.citation: Mutat Res. 1980 Apr;70(2):157-65
references.pmid: 7374657
references.citation: Mol Microbiol. 2012 Feb;83(4):759-74
references.pmid: 22211723
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 1975 Aug;123(2):651-7
references.pmid: 1150627
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jul 18;103(29):10935-40
references.pmid: 16829582
references.citation: Arch Microbiol. 2002 Sep;178(3):193-201
references.pmid: 12189420
references.citation: Mol Microbiol. 1998 Jun;28(5):991-1003
references.pmid: 9663685
references.citation: J Mol Biol. 1979 Jun 25;131(2):157-68
references.pmid: 490646
references.citation: J Biomed Biotechnol. 2002;2(2):66-74
references.pmid: 12488586
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(22):6617-26
references.pmid: 15604457
references.citation: Protein Expr Purif. 2010 Feb;69(2):137-46
references.pmid: 19706327
references.citation: J Mol Biol. 2016 Jan 29;428(2 Pt B):477-91
references.pmid: 26711507
references.citation: Methods Enzymol. 1983;91:95-119
references.pmid: 6855607
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 2009 Dec;191(24):7417-29
references.pmid: 19783630
references.citation: Arch Microbiol. 1975 Nov 7;105(3):217-24
references.pmid: 1190956
references.citation: Dev Cell. 2011 Mar 15;20(3):329-41
references.pmid: 21397844
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 2010 Jun;192(11):2701-10
references.pmid: 20363938
references.citation: PLoS Genet. 2011 Jun;7(6):e1002149
references.pmid: 21731505
references.citation: Mol Microbiol. 2005 Nov;58(3):810-23
references.pmid: 16238629
references.citation: Gene. 1988 Oct 15;70(1):191-7
references.pmid: 2853689
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 2000 Oct;182(19):5440-7
references.pmid: 10986247
references.citation: Science. 2006 Jul 7;313(5783):89-92
references.pmid: 16825569
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 2010 Jul;192(13):3545-6
references.pmid: 20418398
references.citation: Microbiology. 2001 Aug;147(Pt 8):2065-75
references.pmid: 11495985
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 1997 Mar;179(6):1931-9
references.pmid: 9068638
references.citation: Mol Microbiol. 2014 Jun;92(6):1260-78
references.pmid: 24784901
references.citation: Cell Mol Life Sci. 2009 Jan;66(1):82-93
references.pmid: 18726173
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 1989 Jan;171(1):473-82
references.pmid: 2492501
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 2002 Dec;184(23):6515-21
references.pmid: 12426339
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2012 Jun;331(1):53-62
references.pmid: 22443140
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 2013 Feb;195(4):696-707
references.pmid: 23204467
references.citation: BMC Syst Biol. 2010;4:52
references.pmid: 20426835
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 2013 Nov;195(22):5025-40
references.pmid: 23995641
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Mar;71(3):971-3
references.pmid: 4522805
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 1979 Apr;138(1):273-4
references.pmid: 374373
references.citation: BMC Biotechnol. 2011;11:92
references.pmid: 21992524
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43772
references.pmid: 22916305
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 2002 Nov;184(22):6235-49
references.pmid: 12399494
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 2015 Aug;197(16):2653-63
references.pmid: 26031909
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Jan 18;97(2):859-64
references.pmid: 10639170
references.citation: Mol Microbiol. 2013 Feb;87(4):802-17
references.pmid: 23279213
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Jun 25;99(13):8737-41
references.pmid: 12060704
references.citation: Nat Rev Microbiol. 2012 Jul;10(7):472-82
references.pmid: 22683880
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1999 Feb 1;171(1):37-42
references.pmid: 9987839