title: Measuring afterschool program quality using setting-level observational approaches.
abstract: As the importance of afterschool hours for youth development is widely acknowledged, afterschool settings have recently received increasing attention as an important venue for youth interventions. A range of intervention programs have been in place, generally aiming at positive youth development through enhancing the quality of programs. A growing need has thus arisen for reliable and valid measures of afterschool quality. This study examined the extent to which the two observational tools, i.e., Caregiver Interaction Scales (CIS) and Promising Practices Rating Scales (PPRS), could serve as reliable and valid tools for assessing the various dimensions of afterschool setting quality. The study shows the potential promise of the instruments, on the one hand, and suggests future directions for improvement of measurement design and development of the field, on the other hand. In particular, our findings suggest the importance of addressing the effect of day-to-day fluctuations in observed afterschool quality.
authors.affiliation: The Pennsylvania State University.
authors.forename: Yoonkyung
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Oh
authors.affiliation: The Pennsylvania State University.
authors.forename: D Wayne
authors.initials: DW
authors.lastname: Osgood
authors.affiliation: The Pennsylvania State University.
authors.forename: Emilie Phillips
authors.initials: EP
authors.lastname: Smith
keywords: Afterschool Program Assessment; Caregiver Interaction Scale; Generalizability theory; Promising Practices Rating Scale; Reliability; Validity
references.citation: Am J Ment Defic. 1981 Sep;86(2):127-37
references.pmid: 7315877
references.citation: Am J Community Psychol. 2010 Jun;45(3-4):325-37
references.pmid: 20232243
references.citation: Am J Community Psychol. 2010 Jun;45(3-4):381-93
references.pmid: 20336364
references.citation: Am J Community Psychol. 2010 Jun;45(3-4):294-309
references.pmid: 20300825
references.citation: Am J Prev Med. 2003 May;24(4):323-31
references.pmid: 12726870
references.citation: J Early Adolesc. 2011 Feb 1;31(1):99-124
references.pmid: 21552353
references.citation: J Adolesc. 2000 Apr;23(2):113-27
references.pmid: 10831137
references.citation: Am J Community Psychol. 2010 Jun;45(3-4):350-7
references.pmid: 20300822
references.citation: New Dir Youth Dev. 2009 Spring;2009(121):89-108
references.pmid: 19358187
references.citation: Child Dev. 1999 May-Jun;70(3):756-67
references.pmid: 10368920
references.citation: Am J Community Psychol. 1996 Jun;24(3):365-87
references.pmid: 8864209
references.citation: Prev Sci. 2004 Dec;5(4):253-66
references.pmid: 15566051
references.citation: Am Psychol. 2000 Jan;55(1):170-83
references.pmid: 11392861
references.citation: Am J Community Psychol. 2002 Apr;30(2):157-97
references.pmid: 12002242
references.citation: Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012 Mar;44(3):450-7
references.pmid: 21814151