title: Learning Linear Spatial-Numeric Associations Improves Accuracy of Memory for Numbers.
abstract: Memory for numbers improves with age and experience. One potential source of improvement is a logarithmic-to-linear shift in children's representations of magnitude. To test this, Kindergartners and second graders estimated the location of numbers on number lines and recalled numbers presented in vignettes (Study 1). Accuracy at number-line estimation predicted memory accuracy on a numerical recall task after controlling for the effect of age and ability to approximately order magnitudes (mapper status). To test more directly whether linear numeric magnitude representations caused improvements in memory, half of children were given feedback on their number-line estimates (Study 2). As expected, learning linear representations was again linked to memory for numerical information even after controlling for age and mapper status. These results suggest that linear representations of numerical magnitude may be a causal factor in development of numeric recall accuracy.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent OH, USA.
authors.forename: Clarissa A
authors.initials: CA
authors.lastname: Thompson
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus OH, USA.
authors.forename: John E
authors.initials: JE
authors.lastname: Opfer
keywords: development; linear representation; logarithmic representation; memory; numerical estimation
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2003 May;14(3):237-43
references.pmid: 12741747
references.citation: Child Dev. 2004 Mar-Apr;75(2):428-44
references.pmid: 15056197
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 2007 Nov;55(3):169-95
references.pmid: 17462620
references.citation: Science. 1974 Feb 8;183(4124):482-8
references.pmid: 17773029
references.citation: J Exp Child Psychol. 2008 Sep;101(1):20-51
references.pmid: 18381214
references.citation: Child Dev. 2008 May-Jun;79(3):788-804
references.pmid: 18489428
references.citation: Cognition. 2008 Sep;108(3):843-9
references.pmid: 18573491
references.citation: Child Dev. 2008 Jul-Aug;79(4):1016-31
references.pmid: 18717904
references.citation: Dev Psychol. 2010 Mar;46(2):545-51
references.pmid: 20210512
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2010 Sep;21(9):1274-81
references.pmid: 20644108
references.citation: Dev Sci. 2010 Sep 1;13(5):761-71
references.pmid: 20712742
references.citation: Child Dev. 2010 Nov-Dec;81(6):1768-86
references.pmid: 21077863
references.citation: Dev Sci. 2011 Jan;14(1):125-35
references.pmid: 21159094
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 2011 Jun;62(4):273-96
references.pmid: 21569877
references.citation: Dev Sci. 2011 Sep;14(5):1194-204; discussion 1205-6
references.pmid: 21884334
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 Feb;142(1):193-208
references.pmid: 22612768
references.citation: Percept Mot Skills. 1975 Jun;40(3):791-4
references.pmid: 241050
references.citation: Cognition. 2016 Apr;149:11-7
references.pmid: 26774104
references.citation: Psychol Clin. 1924 Dec;15(9):261-300
references.pmid: 28909904