title: Application of discrete wavelet transform for analysis of genomic sequences of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
abstract: This paper highlights the potential of discrete wavelet transforms in the analysis and comparison of genomic sequences of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) with different resistance characteristics. Graphical representations of wavelet coefficients and statistical estimates of their parameters have been used to determine the extent of similarity between different sequences of MTB without the use of conventional methods such as Basic Local Alignment Search Tool. Based on the calculation of the energy of wavelet decomposition coefficients of complete genomic sequences, their broad classification of the type of resistance can be done. All the given genomic sequences can be grouped into two broad categories wherein the drug resistant and drug susceptible sequences form one group while the multidrug resistant and extensive drug resistant sequences form the other group. This method of segregation of the sequences is faster than conventional laboratory methods which require 3-4 weeks of culture of sputum samples. Thus the proposed method can be used as a tool to enhance clinical diagnostic investigations in near real-time.
authors.affiliation: Department of Electrical Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Kurukshetra, Haryana 136119 India.
authors.forename: Shiwani
authors.identifier: 0000-0002-0920-5091
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Saini
authors.affiliation: Department of Electrical Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Kurukshetra, Haryana 136119 India.
authors.forename: Lillie
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Dewan
keywords: Discrete wavelet transform; Genomic sequences; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Signal analysis
references.citation: Nat Rev Microbiol. 2013 Aug;11(8):574-85
references.pmid: 24020074
references.citation: Nature. 1998 Jun 11;393(6685):537-44
references.pmid: 9634230
references.citation: J Comput Biol. 2006 Sep;13(7):1289-98
references.pmid: 17037959
references.citation: Archaea. 2005 May;1(5):335-46
references.pmid: 15876567
references.citation: Phys Rev Lett. 1992 Jun 22;68(25):3805-3808
references.pmid: 10045801
references.citation: BMC Infect Dis. 2005 Jul 28;5:62
references.pmid: 16050959
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2003 Jan;19(1):2-9
references.pmid: 12499286
references.citation: Genomics. 2011 Sep;98(3):155-63
references.pmid: 21672622
references.citation: PLoS Med. 2013;10(2):e1001387
references.pmid: 23424287
references.citation: J Clin Microbiol. 2015 Jul;53(7):2230-7
references.pmid: 25972414
references.citation: Elife. 2015 Mar 03;4:null
references.pmid: 25732036
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2000 Dec;16(12):1073-81
references.pmid: 11159326
references.citation: Lancet Infect Dis. 2015 Oct;15(10):1124-5
references.pmid: 26116184
references.citation: Biometrics. 2010 Sep;66(3):684-93
references.pmid: 19817738
references.citation: BMC Genomics. 2003 May 5;4(1):17
references.pmid: 12732098
references.citation: BMC Bioinformatics. 2011 May 11;12:146
references.pmid: 21569311
references.citation: Clin Microbiol Rev. 2015 Apr;28(2):523-39
references.pmid: 25810419
references.citation: Genome Res. 2009 Jul;19(7):1153-64
references.pmid: 19502380
references.citation: PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e56577
references.pmid: 23437175
references.citation: Lancet Infect Dis. 2015 Oct;15(10):1193-202
references.pmid: 26116186
references.citation: J Theor Biol. 2000 Oct 7;206(3):323-6
references.pmid: 10988018
references.citation: Eur Respir J. 2008 Nov;32(5):1165-74
references.pmid: 18614561
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2003 Mar 22;19(5):593-9
references.pmid: 12651717