title: An approach to scoring cursorial limb proportions in carnivorous dinosaurs and an attempt to account for allometry.
abstract: From an initial dataset of 53 theropod species, the general relationship between theropod lower-leg length and body mass is identified. After factoring out this allometric relationship, theropod hindlimb proportions are assessed irrespective of body mass. Cursorial-limb-proportion (CLP) scores derived for each of the considered theropod taxa offer a measure of the extent to which a particular species deviates in favour of higher or lower running speeds. Within the same theropod species, these CLP scores are found to be consistent across multiple adult specimens and across disparate ontogenetic stages. Early theropods are found to have low CLP scores, while the coelurosaurian tyrannosauroids and compsognathids are found to have high CLP scores. Among deinonychosaurs, troodontids have consistently high CLP scores, while many dromaeosaur taxa, including Velociraptor and Deinonychus, have low CLP scores. This indicates that dromaeosaurs were not, overall, a particularly cursorily adapted group. Comparisons between the CLP scores of Tyrannosaurus and specimens referred to the controversial genus Nanotyrannus indicate a strong discrepancy in cursorial adaptations, which supports the legitimacy of Nanotyrannus and the previous suggestions of ecological partitioning between Nanotyrannus and the contemporaneous Tyrannosaurus.
authors.affiliation: Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
authors.forename: W Scott
authors.initials: WS
authors.lastname: Persons
authors.affiliation: Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
authors.forename: Philip J
authors.initials: PJ
authors.lastname: Currie
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001842:Bone and Bones / Q000033:anatomy & histology; D060435:Carnivory; D025061:Dinosaurs / Q000033:anatomy & histology* / Q000145:classification / Q000502:physiology; D005121:Extremities / Q000033:anatomy & histology*; D005580:Fossils; D010802:Phylogeny
references.citation: Nature. 2002 Feb 28;415(6875):1018-21
references.pmid: 11875567
references.citation: J Morphol. 2003 Feb;255(2):215-27
references.pmid: 12474267
references.citation: Nature. 2006 Mar 16;440(7082):292-4
references.pmid: 16541062
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Nov 7;274(1626):2711-6
references.pmid: 17711833
references.citation: Science. 1992 Nov 13;258(5085):1137-40
references.pmid: 17789086
references.citation: Anat Rec (Hoboken). 2011 Jan;294(1):119-31
references.pmid: 21157923
references.citation: BMC Biol. 2012 Jul 10;10:60
references.pmid: 22781121
references.citation: Naturwissenschaften. 2013 Feb;100(2):165-75
references.pmid: 23314810
references.citation: Nature. 2014 Nov 13;515(7526):257-60
references.pmid: 25337880
references.citation: Physiol Rev. 1989 Oct;69(4):1199-227
references.pmid: 2678167
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1977 Sep 30;299:146-60
references.pmid: 280197
references.citation: Evolution. 1996 Feb;50(1):331-340
references.pmid: 28568886
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 1985 Mar;115:283-92
references.pmid: 4031770
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 1983 Jul;105:147-71
references.pmid: 6619724
references.citation: Science. 1996 May 17;272(5264):986-91
references.pmid: 8662584