title: A Puzzle Unsolved: Failure to Observe Different Effects of God and Religion Primes on Intergroup Attitudes.
abstract: Religious priming has been found to have both positive and negative consequences, and recent research suggests that the activation of God-related and community-related religious cognitions may cause outgroup prosociality and outgroup derogation respectively. The present research sought to examine whether reminders of God and religion have different effects on attitudes towards ingroup and outgroup members. Over two studies, little evidence was found for different effects of these two types of religious primes. In study 1, individuals primed with the words "religion", "God" and a neutral control word evaluated both ingroup and outgroup members similarly, although a marginal tendency towards more negative evaluations of outgroup members by females exposed to religion primes was observed. In study 2, no significant differences in attitudes towards an outgroup member were observed between the God, religion, and neutral priming conditions. Furthermore, the gender effect observed in study 1 did not replicate in this second study. Possible explanations for these null effects are discussed.
authors.affiliation: UniSIM College, SIM University, Singapore, Singapore.
authors.forename: Jonathan E
authors.initials: JE
authors.lastname: Ramsay
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
authors.forename: Eddie M W
authors.initials: EM
authors.lastname: Tong
authors.affiliation: Division of Psychology, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore.
authors.forename: Joyce S
authors.initials: JS
authors.lastname: Pang
authors.affiliation: Centre for Applied Research, SIM University, Singapore, Singapore.
authors.forename: Avijit
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Chowdhury
mesh_terms: D001290:Attitude; D002016:Buddhism; D002835:Christianity; D004192:Discrimination, Psychological; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D008297:Male; D011287:Prejudice; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2010 Feb;14(1):126-39
references.pmid: 20018983
references.citation: Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2016 Feb;20(1):27-48
references.pmid: 25673322
references.citation: Eur J Soc Psychol. 2006;36(2):147-168
references.pmid: 19844598
references.citation: Science. 2007 Oct 26;318(5850):636-40
references.pmid: 17962562
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2007 Sep;18(9):803-9
references.pmid: 17760777
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Jun 22;278(1713):1858-63
references.pmid: 21106588
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Jun;82(6):878-902
references.pmid: 12051578
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2013 Jun;17(6):272-80
references.pmid: 23664451
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Jan;82(1):62-8
references.pmid: 11811635
references.citation: Science. 2003 Mar 7;299(5612):1534-9
references.pmid: 12624256
references.citation: Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2010 Feb;14(1):140-50
references.pmid: 20089848
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2006 Jun;62(11):2848-60
references.pmid: 16359765
references.citation: Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013 Nov;39(11):1471-83
references.pmid: 23969621
references.citation: Front Psychol. 2015 Sep 15;6:1365
references.pmid: 26441741
references.citation: PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e99447
references.pmid: 24992091
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Oct;91(4):652-61
references.pmid: 17014291
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1984 Dec;47(6):1191-205
references.pmid: 6527214
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2015 Dec;144(6):e94-104
references.pmid: 26168038
references.citation: Behav Brain Sci. 2010 Jun;33(2-3):61-83; discussion 83-135
references.pmid: 20550733