title: Psychiatric classifications: validity and utility.
abstract: Despite historical assumptions to the contrary, there is little evidence that the majority of recognized mental disorders are separated by natural boundaries. Diagnostic categories defined by their clinical syndromes should be regarded as 'valid' only if they have been shown to be truly discrete entities. Most diagnostic concepts in psychiatry have not been demonstrated to be valid in this sense, though many possess 'utility' by virtue of the information they convey about presenting symptoms, outcome, treatment response and, in some instances, aetiology. While researchers in genetics, neurobiology and population epidemiology are increasingly more likely to adopt a continuum/dimensional view of the variation in symptomatology, clinicians prefer to hold on to the categorical approach embodied in current classifications such as ICD-10 and DSM-5. Both points of view have plausible justification in their respective contexts, but the way forward may be in their conceptual reconciliation.
authors.affiliation: Centre for Clinical Research in Neuropsychiatry, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, 6000, Australia.
authors.forename: Assen
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Jablensky
keywords: DSM; ICD; Psychiatric diagnosis; psychiatric classification; utility; validity
references.citation: Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1980 Jun;37(6):699-706
references.pmid: 7387341
references.citation: Encephale. 1979;5(5 Suppl):459-62
references.pmid: 548268
references.citation: Am J Psychiatry. 1995 Feb;152(2):161-2
references.pmid: 7840346
references.citation: Br J Psychiatry. 1998 Oct;173:312-9
references.pmid: 9926035
references.citation: Am J Psychiatry. 1970 Jan;126(7):983-7
references.pmid: 5409569
references.citation: Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1994 Jun;51(6):456-68
references.pmid: 8192548
references.citation: Schizophr Bull. 1988;14(2):217-22
references.pmid: 3201179
references.citation: Psychiatr Q. 1949 Apr;23(2):248-76
references.pmid: 18137714
references.citation: Psychol Med Monogr Suppl. 1992;20:1-97
references.pmid: 1565705
references.citation: Nat Genet. 2013 Sep;45(9):984-94
references.pmid: 23933821
references.citation: Lancet. 1996 Aug 31;348(9027):594-6
references.pmid: 8774576
references.citation: Nature. 2014 Jul 24;511(7510):421-7
references.pmid: 25056061
references.citation: Mol Psychiatry. 2013 Oct;18(10):1058-66
references.pmid: 23628988
references.citation: Am J Psychiatry. 2003 Jan;160(1):4-12
references.pmid: 12505793
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 2000 Nov;126(6):946-63
references.pmid: 11107884
references.citation: Lancet. 2013 Apr 20;381(9875):1371-1379
references.pmid: 23453885
references.citation: Schizophr Bull. 2013 Jul;39(4):923-32
references.pmid: 22589370
references.citation: Am J Psychiatry. 1994 Jun;151(6 Suppl):144-54
references.pmid: 8192190
references.citation: Schizophr Bull. 2007 Jul;33(4):905-11
references.pmid: 17551090