title: A potential mate influences reproductive development in female, but not male, pine siskins.
abstract: The role of photoperiod in avian reproductive timing has been well studied, and we are increasingly recognizing the roles of other environmental cues such as social cues. However, few studies have evaluated the extent to which males and females of the same species respond similarly to the same type of cue. Moreover, previous studies have rarely examined how variation in the quality or nature of a given social cue might modulate its effect. Here, we examine the sensitivity of male and female pine siskins (Spinus pinus) to a potential mate as a stimulatory cue for gonadal recrudescence, and we investigate whether variation in the relationship between a bird and its potential mate modulates the effect of that potential mate. Birds were initially housed without opposite sex birds on a 12L:12D photoperiod with ad libitum food. After gonadal recrudescence had begun males and females were randomly paired with an opposite sex bird or housed alone. An additional group of males was paired with estradiol-implanted females. In males, these social treatments had no effect on testis length, cloacal protuberance length, luteinizing hormone (LH) levels, or testosterone levels. In females, presence of a potential mate had a significant and positive effect on ovary score, defeathering of the brood patch, and LH levels. Among paired birds, the degree of affiliation within a pair corresponded to the extent of reproductive development in females, but not males. Thus, reproductive timing in females appears to be sensitive to both the presence of a potential mate and her relationship with him.
authors.affiliation: Department of Biology, Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles, CA 90045, USA. Electronic address: hwatts1@lmu.edu.
authors.forename: Heather E
authors.initials: HE
authors.lastname: Watts
authors.affiliation: Department of Biology, Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles, CA 90045, USA.
authors.forename: Bruce
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Edley
authors.affiliation: Department of Neurobiology, Physiology & Behavior, University of California, Davis 95616, USA.
authors.forename: Thomas P
authors.initials: TP
authors.lastname: Hahn
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D002988:Cloaca / Q000254:growth & development*; D005260:Female; D007986:Luteinizing Hormone / Q000097:blood*; D008297:Male; D010053:Ovary / Q000254:growth & development*; D010152:Pair Bond; D017440:Photoperiod; D012726:Sexual Behavior, Animal / Q000502:physiology*; D012931:Social Environment; D020308:Songbirds / Q000502:physiology*; D013737:Testis / Q000254:growth & development*; D013739:Testosterone / Q000097:blood*
chemical_list: D013739:Testosterone; D007986:Luteinizing Hormone
keywords: Affiliation; Birds; Breeding; Environmental cues; Luteinizing hormone; Pair formation; Reproductive timing; Sex differences; Social cues
references.citation: Horm Behav. 2008 Nov;54(5):669-75
references.pmid: 18706906
references.citation: Horm Behav. 1991 Jun;25(2):180-94
references.pmid: 2066079
references.citation: Comp Biochem Physiol A Comp Physiol. 1991;100(3):719-24
references.pmid: 1685980
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2006 Oct;209(Pt 19):3786-94
references.pmid: 16985195
references.citation: Horm Behav. 2008 Apr;53(4):567-72
references.pmid: 18295766
references.citation: Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1997 Jul;107(1):44-62
references.pmid: 9208305
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1998 Jul 15;18(14):5477-89
references.pmid: 9651228
references.citation: Horm Behav. 2000 May;37(3):179-89
references.pmid: 10868481
references.citation: Horm Behav. 2007 Jan;51(1):46-53
references.pmid: 16999958
references.citation: Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2008 Apr 1;156(2):385-94
references.pmid: 18295765
references.citation: Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2004 May 15;137(1):99-108
references.pmid: 15094340
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008 Jan 27;363(1490):231-46
references.pmid: 17638693
references.citation: Horm Behav. 2001 Sep;40(2):281-90
references.pmid: 11534993
references.citation: Anim Behav. 2000 Feb;59(2):371-378
references.pmid: 10675259
references.citation: Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2003 Apr;131(2):143-58
references.pmid: 12679091
references.citation: Endocrinology. 2015 Feb;156(2):694-706
references.pmid: 25490148
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Feb 22;272(1561):383-8
references.pmid: 15734692
references.citation: Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2012 Sep 1;178(2):259-64
references.pmid: 22569115
references.citation: Horm Behav. 2015 May;71:49-59
references.pmid: 25870020
references.citation: Science. 1976 May 7;192(4239):574-5
references.pmid: 17745657
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Nov 27;364(1534):3331-40
references.pmid: 19833645
references.citation: Science. 1970 Apr 24;168(3930):480-2
references.pmid: 17838128
references.citation: Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2003 Oct;28(7):916-31
references.pmid: 12892658
references.citation: Horm Behav. 1992 Sep;26(3):394-405
references.pmid: 1398558
references.citation: Am Nat. 2012 Feb;179(2):E55-69
references.pmid: 22218320
references.citation: J Exp Zool. 1976 Jul;197(1):81-7
references.pmid: 939963
references.citation: Nature. 1974 Jul 5;250(461):80-2
references.pmid: 4841590
references.citation: Stat Med. 2006 Feb 28;25(4):543-57
references.pmid: 16252269
references.citation: Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2008 Jul;157(3):207-16
references.pmid: 18558405
references.citation: Anim Behav. 1965 Oct;13(4):575-8
references.pmid: 5894177
references.citation: Horm Behav. 2004 Jan;45(1):64-70
references.pmid: 14733893
references.citation: Horm Behav. 2015 Nov;76:23-33
references.pmid: 25917863
references.citation: Horm Behav. 1986 Jun;20(2):222-34
references.pmid: 3721414
references.citation: J Comp Neurol. 2009 Nov 10;517(2):146-55
references.pmid: 19731303
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2005 Dec;208(Pt 24):4593-8
references.pmid: 16326941
references.citation: Science. 2005 Sep 30;309(5744):2210-2
references.pmid: 16195460