title: Time to Say Goodbye to the 16 EPA PAHs? Toward an Up-to-Date Use of PACs for Environmental Purposes.
abstract: The 16 EPA PAHs have played an exceptionally large role above all in environmental and analytical sciences in the last 40 years, but now there are good reasons to question their utility in many circumstances even though their use is so established and comfortable. Here we review the reasons why the list has been so successful and why sometimes it is seen as less relevant. Three groups of polycyclic aromatic compounds (PAC) are missing: larger and highly relevant PAHs, alkylated PACs, and compounds containing heteroatoms. Attempts to improve the situation for certain matrixes are known and here: (1) an updated list of PAHs (including the 16 EPA PAHs) for the evaluation of the toxicity in the environment (40 EnvPAHs); (2) a list of 23 NSO-heterocyclic compounds and 6 heterocyclic metabolites; and (3) lists of 10 oxy-PAHs and 10 nitro-PAHs are proposed for practical use in the future. A discussion in the scientific community about these lists is invited. Although the state of knowledge has improved dramatically since the introduction of the 16 EPA PAHs in the 1970s, this summary also shows that more research is needed about the toxicity, occurrence in the environment and chemical analysis, particularly of alkylated PAHs, higher molecular weight PAHs and substituted PACs such as amino-PAHs, cyano-PAHs, etc.. We also suggest that a long overdue discussion of an update of regulatory environmental PAH analysis is initiated.
authors.affiliation: Institute of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, University of Muenster , Muenster , Germany.
authors.forename: Jan T
authors.initials: JT
authors.lastname: Andersson
authors.affiliation: Institute of Geology and Palaeontology - Applied Geology, University of Muenster , Muenster , Germany.
authors.forename: Christine
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Achten
references.citation: Environ Sci Technol. 2007 Apr 15;41(8):2861-7
references.pmid: 17533850
references.citation: J Sep Sci. 2004 Jan;27(1-2):78-88
references.pmid: 15335062
references.citation: Environ Sci Technol. 2009 Nov 1;43(21):8119-25
references.pmid: 19924932
references.citation: IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 1995;63:33-477
references.pmid: 9139128
references.citation: Environ Sci Technol. 2012 Mar 20;46(6):3326-34
references.pmid: 22352997
references.citation: Environ Sci Technol. 2012 Oct 16;46(20):11475-6; discussion 11477-8
references.pmid: 22973967
references.citation: Environ Toxicol Chem. 2003 Jul;22(7):1413-20
references.pmid: 12836964
references.citation: J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 1999 Nov-Dec;39(6):1094-104
references.pmid: 10614026
references.citation: Chemosphere. 2013 Jan;90(2):521-6
references.pmid: 22967931
references.citation: Chemosphere. 2012 Sep;89(3):205-12
references.pmid: 22560701
references.citation: Fresenius J Anal Chem. 2001 Dec;371(7):966-74
references.pmid: 11769809
references.citation: Environ Toxicol Chem. 2002 Jul;21(7):1438-50
references.pmid: 12109744
references.citation: Sci Total Environ. 2012 Aug 15;432:97-102
references.pmid: 22728296
references.citation: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2013 Dec;20(12):8511-20
references.pmid: 23666634
references.citation: Anal Bioanal Chem. 2006 Jan;384(2):438-47
references.pmid: 16333601
references.citation: Sci Total Environ. 2014 Oct 1;494-495:320-8
references.pmid: 25063955
references.citation: Anal Chem. 2003 Jan 15;75(2):234-46
references.pmid: 12553757
references.citation: Environ Sci Technol. 2012 Apr 3;46(7):3935-42
references.pmid: 22428566
references.citation: J Chromatogr A. 2012 Sep 21;1256:222-31
references.pmid: 22883158
references.citation: Environ Sci Technol. 2007 Feb 1;41(3):731-7
references.pmid: 17328176
references.citation: Environ Sci Technol. 2003 Jul 15;37(14):3062-70
references.pmid: 12901651
references.citation: Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 1986 May;15(3):241-9
references.pmid: 3524477
references.citation: Environ Sci Technol. 2001 May 15;35(10):1943-52
references.pmid: 11393972
references.citation: Polycycl Aromat Compd. 2015 Mar 15;35(2-4):177-186
references.pmid: 26823644
references.citation: IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 2010;92:1-853
references.pmid: 21141735
references.citation: IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 2013;103:9-303
references.pmid: 24791350
references.citation: Anal Chem. 1988 Apr 1;60(7):630-7
references.pmid: 3382016
references.citation: Chemosphere. 2000 Oct;41(7):989-99
references.pmid: 10879816
references.citation: Ambio. 2007 Sep;36(6):475-85
references.pmid: 17985702
references.citation: J Environ Monit. 2011 Sep;13(9):2568-74
references.pmid: 21789327
references.citation: Environ Toxicol Chem. 2006 Jan;25(1):287-96
references.pmid: 16494254
references.citation: Sci Total Environ. 2013 Mar 1;447:80-9
references.pmid: 23376519
references.citation: J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 1995 Jul;6(7):597-607
references.pmid: 24214357
references.citation: Polycycl Aromat Compd. 2015 Mar 15;35(2-4):248-284
references.pmid: 26681897
references.citation: Environ Sci Technol. 2013 Oct 15;47(20):11766-75
references.pmid: 24024738
references.citation: Int J Cancer. 1979 Feb;23(2):201-8
references.pmid: 761942
references.citation: Anal Bioanal Chem. 2008 Jul;391(6):2235-48
references.pmid: 18521577
references.citation: Anal Chem. 2012 Mar 6;84(5):2245-52
references.pmid: 22339202