title: Skin Microbiome Surveys Are Strongly Influenced by Experimental Design.
abstract: Culture-independent studies to characterize skin microbiota are increasingly common, due in part to affordable and accessible sequencing and analysis platforms. Compared to culture-based techniques, DNA sequencing of the bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene or whole metagenome shotgun (WMS) sequencing provides more precise microbial community characterizations. Most widely used protocols were developed to characterize microbiota of other habitats (i.e., gastrointestinal) and have not been systematically compared for their utility in skin microbiome surveys. Here we establish a resource for the cutaneous research community to guide experimental design in characterizing skin microbiota. We compare two widely sequenced regions of the 16S rRNA gene to WMS sequencing for recapitulating skin microbiome community composition, diversity, and genetic functional enrichment. We show that WMS sequencing most accurately recapitulates microbial communities, but sequencing of hypervariable regions 1-3 of the 16S rRNA gene provides highly similar results. Sequencing of hypervariable region 4 poorly captures skin commensal microbiota, especially Propionibacterium. WMS sequencing, which is resource and cost intensive, provides evidence of a community's functional potential; however, metagenome predictions based on 16S rRNA sequence tags closely approximate WMS genetic functional profiles. This study highlights the importance of experimental design for downstream results in skin microbiome surveys.
authors.affiliation: Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
authors.forename: Jacquelyn S
authors.initials: JS
authors.lastname: Meisel
authors.affiliation: Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
authors.forename: Geoffrey D
authors.initials: GD
authors.lastname: Hannigan
authors.affiliation: Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
authors.forename: Amanda S
authors.initials: AS
authors.lastname: Tyldsley
authors.affiliation: Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
authors.forename: Adam J
authors.initials: AJ
authors.lastname: SanMiguel
authors.affiliation: Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
authors.forename: Brendan P
authors.initials: BP
authors.lastname: Hodkinson
authors.affiliation: Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
authors.forename: Qi
authors.initials: Q
authors.lastname: Zheng
authors.affiliation: Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. Electronic address: egrice@upenn.edu.
authors.forename: Elizabeth A
authors.initials: EA
authors.lastname: Grice
mesh_terms: D001419:Bacteria / Q000235:genetics*; D006801:Humans; D056186:Metagenomics / Q000379:methods*; D064307:Microbiota / Q000235:genetics*; D011786:Quality Control; D012333:RNA, Messenger / Q000235:genetics; D012107:Research Design; D017422:Sequence Analysis, DNA / Q000379:methods*; D012867:Skin / Q000382:microbiology*; D013210:Staphylococcus / Q000235:genetics; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D046509:Tissue Culture Techniques
chemical_list: D012333:RNA, Messenger
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39315
references.pmid: 22720093
references.citation: PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8(6):e1002358
references.pmid: 22719234
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e47075
references.pmid: 23071716
references.citation: Nat Commun. 2013;4:1431
references.pmid: 23385576
references.citation: Diabetes. 2013 Mar;62(3):923-30
references.pmid: 23139351
references.citation: FASEB J. 2013 Mar;27(3):1012-22
references.pmid: 23165986
references.citation: Mol Syst Biol. 2013;9:666
references.pmid: 23670539
references.citation: Nature. 2013 Jun 20;498(7454):367-70
references.pmid: 23698366
references.citation: J Invest Dermatol. 2013 Sep;133(9):2152-60
references.pmid: 23337890
references.citation: Nat Biotechnol. 2013 Sep;31(9):814-21
references.pmid: 23975157
references.citation: PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e76185
references.pmid: 24146837
references.citation: Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2013 Dec;3(12):a015362
references.pmid: 24296350
references.citation: PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e94249
references.pmid: 24722003
references.citation: BMC Biol. 2014;12:69
references.pmid: 25184604
references.citation: Nature. 2014 Oct 2;514(7520):59-64
references.pmid: 25279917
references.citation: BMC Biol. 2014;12:87
references.pmid: 25387460
references.citation: ISME J. 2014 Dec;8(12):2357-9
references.pmid: 25171332
references.citation: PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0132783
references.pmid: 26182345
references.citation: MBio. 2015;6(5):e01578-15
references.pmid: 26489866
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Jul;72(7):5069-72
references.pmid: 16820507
references.citation: J Microbiol Methods. 2007 May;69(2):330-9
references.pmid: 17391789
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Aug;73(16):5261-7
references.pmid: 17586664
references.citation: Science. 2009 May 29;324(5931):1190-2
references.pmid: 19478181
references.citation: Nat Methods. 2010 May;7(5):335-6
references.pmid: 20383131
references.citation: BMC Microbiol. 2010;10:206
references.pmid: 20673359
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2010 Oct 1;26(19):2460-1
references.pmid: 20709691
references.citation: BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11:538
references.pmid: 21034504
references.citation: Genome Res. 2011 Mar;21(3):494-504
references.pmid: 21212162
references.citation: PLoS One. 2011;6(3):e17288
references.pmid: 21408061
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Mar 15;108 Suppl 1:4516-22
references.pmid: 20534432
references.citation: Nature. 2012 Jun 14;486(7402):207-14
references.pmid: 22699609
references.citation: Nature. 2012 Jun 14;486(7402):215-21
references.pmid: 22699610
references.citation: Nat Methods. 2012 Aug;9(8):811-4
references.pmid: 22688413