title: Fast Versus Slow Recruitment Maneuver at Different Degrees of Acute Lung Inflammation Induced by Experimental Sepsis.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Large tidal volume (VT) breaths or "recruitment maneuvers" (RMs) are used commonly to open collapsed lungs, but their effectiveness may depend on how the RM is delivered. We hypothesized that a stepped approach to RM delivery ("slow" RM) compared with a nonstepped ("fast" RM), when followed by decremental positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration to lowest dynamic elastance, would (1) yield a more homogeneous inflation of the lungs, thus reducing the PEEP obtained during post-RM titration; (2) produce less lung morphofunctional injury, regardless of the severity of sepsis-induced acute lung inflammation; and (3) result in less biological damage in severe, but not in moderate, acute lung inflammation.
  
  
  METHODS
  Sepsis was induced by cecal ligation and puncture surgery in 51 Wistar rats. After 48 hours, animals were anesthetized, mechanically ventilated (VT = 6 mL/kg), and stratified by PO2/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio into moderate (≥300) and severe (<300) acute lung inflammation groups. Each group was then subdivided randomly into 3 subgroups: (1) nonrecruited; (2) RM with continuous positive airway pressure (30 cm H2O for 30 seconds; CPAPRM or fast RM); and (3) RM with stepwise airway pressure increase (5 cm H2O/step, 8.5 seconds/step, 6 steps, 51 seconds; STEPRM or slow RM), with a maximum pressure hold for 10 seconds. All animals underwent decremental PEEP titration to determine the level of PEEP required to optimize dynamic compliance after RM and were then ventilated for 60 minutes with VT = 6 mL/kg, respiratory rate = 80 bpm, fraction of inspired oxygen = 0.4, and the newly adjusted PEEP for each animal. Respiratory mechanics, hemodynamics, and arterial blood gases were measured before and at the end of 60-minute mechanical ventilation. Lung histology and biological markers of inflammation and damage inflicted to endothelial cells were evaluated at the end of the 60-minute mechanical ventilation.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Respiratory system mean airway pressure was lower in STEPRM than that in CPAPRM. The total RM time was greater, and the RM rise angle was lower in STEPRM than that in CPAPRM. In both moderate and severe acute lung inflammation groups, STEPRM reduced total diffuse alveolar damage score compared with the score in nonrecruited rats. In moderate acute lung inflammation, STEPRM rats compared with CPAPRM rats had less endothelial cell damage and angiopoietin (Ang)-2 expression. In severe acute lung inflammation, STEPRM compared with CPAPRM reduced hyperinflation, endothelial cell damage, Ang-2, and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 expressions. RM rise angle correlated with Ang-2 expression.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Compared with CPAPRM, STEPRM reduced biological markers associated with endothelial cell damage and ultrastructural endothelial cell injury in both moderate and severe sepsis-induced acute lung inflammation.
authors.affiliation: From the *Laboratory of Pulmonary Investigation, Carlos Chagas Filho Biophysics Institute, †Laboratory of Experimental Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, and ‡Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Carlos Chagas Filho Biophysics Institute, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; §Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; ‖Rio de Janeiro Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; ¶Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis/Regions Hospital, Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, St Paul, Minnesota; #Pulmonary Engineering Group, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Therapy, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; and **IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
authors.forename: Raquel S
authors.initials: RS
authors.lastname: Santos
authors.forename: Lillian
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Moraes
authors.forename: Cynthia S
authors.initials: CS
authors.lastname: Samary
authors.forename: Cíntia L
authors.initials: CL
authors.lastname: Santos
authors.forename: Maíra B A
authors.initials: MB
authors.lastname: Ramos
authors.forename: Ana P
authors.initials: AP
authors.lastname: Vasconcellos
authors.forename: Lucas F
authors.initials: LF
authors.lastname: Horta
authors.forename: Marcelo M
authors.initials: MM
authors.lastname: Morales
authors.forename: Vera L
authors.initials: VL
authors.lastname: Capelozzi
authors.forename: Cristiane S N B
authors.initials: CS
authors.lastname: Garcia
authors.forename: John J
authors.initials: JJ
authors.lastname: Marini
authors.forename: Marcelo
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Gama de Abreu
authors.forename: Paolo
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Pelosi
authors.forename: Pedro L
authors.initials: PL
authors.lastname: Silva
authors.forename: Patricia R M
authors.initials: PR
authors.lastname: Rocco
mesh_terms: D000208:Acute Disease; D000818:Animals; D008297:Male; D011014:Pneumonia / Q000209:etiology* / Q000378:metabolism / Q000473:pathology*; D011175:Positive-Pressure Respiration / Q000009:adverse effects; D051381:Rats; D017208:Rats, Wistar; D011999:Recruitment, Neurophysiological; D012121:Respiration, Artificial / Q000009:adverse effects; D018805:Sepsis / Q000150:complications* / Q000378:metabolism / Q000473:pathology*