title: On the automaticity of relational stimulus processing.
abstract: While it is widely accepted that the semantic analysis of a stimulus can take place in an automatic fashion, it is typically assumed that non-automatic processes are required to process the relation of one stimulus relative to other stimuli. Nevertheless, there is evidence to support the idea that such relational stimulus processing can also take place under automaticity conditions. We examined this hypothesis further in four sequential priming experiments in which participants were asked to categorize target objects as larger or smaller than a reference object (i.e., a football or a car). Crucially, some primes were objects that were larger than the small reference object but smaller than the large reference object (e.g., a bike). Results showed that the impact of these primes upon target responding was dependent on the size of the reference object. When the size of the reference object was small, these primes facilitated responses towards large targets relative to small targets. Vice versa, when the size of the reference object was large, the same set of primes facilitated responses towards small targets relative to large targets. This result was obtained when the size of the reference object was manipulated block-wise (Experiments 1 and 3), trial-wise (Experiments 2 and 4), and even when the primes were presented near subjective recognition thresholds (Experiment 4). Taken together, our findings provide strong evidence for the hypothesis that complex relational stimulus processing can take place under automaticity conditions. A possible underlying mechanism is proposed.
authors.affiliation: Department of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, H. Dunantlaan 2, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. niclas.heider@ugent.be.
authors.forename: Niclas
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Heider
authors.affiliation: Department of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, H. Dunantlaan 2, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
authors.forename: Adriaan
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Spruyt
authors.affiliation: Department of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, H. Dunantlaan 2, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
authors.forename: Jan
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: De Houwer
mesh_terms: D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D060865:Repetition Priming; D012858:Size Perception; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2001 Feb;27(1):154-65
references.pmid: 11248930
references.citation: Annu Rev Psychol. 2003;54:297-327
references.pmid: 12172003
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2005 Sep;31(5):991-1000
references.pmid: 16248747
references.citation: J Abnorm Psychol. 2002 Nov;111(4):648-658
references.pmid: 12428778
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 1998 Sep;127(3):318-9
references.pmid: 9742719
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2013 Dec;25(12):2216-29
references.pmid: 23859642
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2003 Oct;29(5):937-48
references.pmid: 14585015
references.citation: Cogn Emot. 2014 Apr;28(3):560-9
references.pmid: 24083512
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005 Aug;31(4):762-77
references.pmid: 16131248
references.citation: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 Feb;50(2):229-38
references.pmid: 3701576
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 2006 Mar;132(2):297-326
references.pmid: 16536645
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Aug;16(4):648-53
references.pmid: 19648447
references.citation: Exp Psychol. 2007;54(1):44-53
references.pmid: 17341014
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2000 Mar;3(3):277-83
references.pmid: 10700261
references.citation: Nature. 1998 Oct 8;395(6702):597-600
references.pmid: 9783584
references.citation: PLoS One. 2015 Mar 24;10(3):e0121564
references.pmid: 25803444
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2011 Apr;15(4):152-9
references.pmid: 21376657
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Oct;18(10):1734-48
references.pmid: 17014377
references.citation: Exp Psychol. 2010;57(1):36-45
references.pmid: 20178962
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1990 Apr;97(2):253-70
references.pmid: 2186425
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000 Mar;26(2):441-55
references.pmid: 10764105
references.citation: Cognition. 2012 Jan;122(1):91-5
references.pmid: 21956000
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 2009 May;135(3):347-68
references.pmid: 19379018
references.citation: Conscious Cogn. 2002 Dec;11(4):528-45
references.pmid: 12470621
references.citation: Conscious Cogn. 2015 Sep;35:342-56
references.pmid: 25680827
references.citation: Exp Psychol. 2004;51(2):109-15
references.pmid: 15114903
references.citation: Q J Exp Psychol A. 2001 Aug;54(3):727-51
references.pmid: 11548032
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2010 Aug;139(3):464-89
references.pmid: 20677895
references.citation: Acta Psychol (Amst). 2005 Jun;119(2):159-87
references.pmid: 15877979
references.citation: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2002 Feb;13(1):27-39
references.pmid: 11867248
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 1998 Sep;127(3):286-303
references.pmid: 9742717
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Feb;14(1):118-25
references.pmid: 17546741
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 1993 Nov;114(3):510-32
references.pmid: 8272468
references.citation: Cognition. 2003 Jun;88(2):223-42
references.pmid: 12763320
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 2013 Sep;139(5):1062-89
references.pmid: 23339522
references.citation: Can J Exp Psychol. 2011 Jun;65(2):125-32
references.pmid: 21668095
references.citation: Cognition. 2001 Jul;80(3):215-29
references.pmid: 11274983
references.citation: Cognition. 2010 Sep;116(3):303-20
references.pmid: 20542262
references.citation: Q J Exp Psychol A. 2005 Aug;58(6):1043-63
references.pmid: 16194947
references.citation: Conscious Cogn. 2014 Jul;27:268-87
references.pmid: 24960432
references.citation: Br J Math Stat Psychol. 1998 Nov;51 ( Pt 2):253-67
references.pmid: 9854945
references.citation: Vision Res. 2002 Jan;42(1):107-23
references.pmid: 11804636
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2012 Dec;16(12):593-605
references.pmid: 23127330
references.citation: Conscious Cogn. 2010 Dec;19(4):999-1006
references.pmid: 20537925