title: When can stress facilitate divergence by altering time to flowering?
abstract: Stressors and heterogeneity are ubiquitous features of natural environments, and theory suggests that when environmental qualities alter flowering schedules through phenotypic plasticity, assortative mating can result that promotes evolutionary divergence. Therefore, it is important to determine whether common ecological stressors induce similar changes in flowering time. We review previous studies to determine whether two important stressors, water restriction and herbivory, induce consistent flowering time responses among species; for example, how often do water restriction and herbivory both delay flowering? We focus on the direction of change in flowering time, which affects the potential for divergence in heterogeneous environments. We also tested whether these stressors influenced time to flowering and nonphenology traits using Mimulus guttatus. The literature review suggests that water restriction has variable effects on flowering time, whereas herbivory delays flowering with exceptional consistency. In the Mimulus experiment, low water and herbivory advanced and delayed flowering, respectively. Overall, our results temper theoretical predictions for evolutionary divergence due to habitat-induced changes in flowering time; in particular, we discuss how accounting for variation in the direction of change in flowering time can either increase or decrease the potential for divergence. In addition, we caution against adaptive interpretations of stress-induced phenology shifts.
authors.affiliation: Department of Zoology University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia V6T 1Z4 Canada.
authors.forename: Crispin Y
authors.initials: CY
authors.lastname: Jordan
authors.affiliation: Department of Zoology University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia V6T 1Z4 Canada.
authors.forename: Dilara
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Ally
authors.affiliation: Department of Zoology University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia V6T 1Z4 Canada.
authors.forename: Kathryn A
authors.initials: KA
authors.lastname: Hodgins
keywords: Assortative mating; Mimulus guttatus; drought; flowering time; herbivory; local adaptation; phenology; phenotypic plasticity; water stress
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 1999 May;14(5):179-185
references.pmid: 10322530
references.citation: Evolution. 2000 Feb;54(1):93-111
references.pmid: 10937187
references.citation: Evolution. 2000 Jun;54(3):764-77
references.pmid: 10937251
references.citation: Evolution. 2002 Jan;56(1):22-30
references.pmid: 11913665
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Apr 7;269(1492):677-83
references.pmid: 11934358
references.citation: Plant J. 2002 Aug;31(3):279-92
references.pmid: 12164808
references.citation: Nature. 2003 Jan 16;421(6920):259-64
references.pmid: 12529641
references.citation: J Evol Biol. 2004 Sep;17(5):1121-31
references.pmid: 15312084
references.citation: Heredity (Edinb). 2005 Sep;95(3):235-42
references.pmid: 16077737
references.citation: New Phytol. 2006;169(2):243-50
references.pmid: 16411928
references.citation: Nature. 2006 May 11;441(7090):210-3
references.pmid: 16467788
references.citation: Heredity (Edinb). 2006 Jul;97(1):33-7
references.pmid: 16639420
references.citation: Ecology. 2006 Oct;87(10):2591-602
references.pmid: 17089667
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jan 23;104(4):1278-82
references.pmid: 17220273
references.citation: Evolution. 2006 Dec;60(12):2466-77
references.pmid: 17263109
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2007 Aug;22(8):432-9
references.pmid: 17573151
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2007 Jul;16(14):2910-21
references.pmid: 17614906
references.citation: J Evol Biol. 2008 Sep;21(5):1321-34
references.pmid: 18557796
references.citation: Genetics. 2008 Aug;179(4):2091-112
references.pmid: 18660541
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Dec 7;275(1652):2723-32
references.pmid: 18700202
references.citation: Am Nat. 1997 Jul;150(1):1-23
references.pmid: 18811273
references.citation: Heredity (Edinb). 2009 Mar;102(3):303-11
references.pmid: 19092760
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2009 Apr;21(4):1080-94
references.pmid: 19395683
references.citation: Am Nat. 1993 Feb;141(2):338-50
references.pmid: 19426086
references.citation: Evolution. 2009 Aug;63(8):2047-60
references.pmid: 19473385
references.citation: New Phytol. 2009 Aug;183(3):661-6
references.pmid: 19500267
references.citation: Oecologia. 2010 Jan;162(1):23-33
references.pmid: 19727827
references.citation: New Phytol. 2011 Apr;190(1):249-57
references.pmid: 21210818
references.citation: Am J Bot. 2004 Jun;91(6):825-36
references.pmid: 21653438
references.citation: Evolution. 2011 Jul;65(7):2123-9
references.pmid: 21729066
references.citation: Ann Bot. 2012 Feb;109(3):583-98
references.pmid: 21831854
references.citation: BMC Plant Biol. 2011 Nov 17;11:163
references.pmid: 22094046
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Feb 28;109(9):3412-5
references.pmid: 22334646
references.citation: BMC Evol Biol. 2012 Jun 08;12:79
references.pmid: 22681626
references.citation: Science. 2012 Oct 5;338(6103):113-6
references.pmid: 23042894
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2013 May 22;280(1763):20131043
references.pmid: 23698015
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jul 15;111(28):10371-6
references.pmid: 24958886
references.citation: Evolution. 1990 Sep;44(6):1424-1435
references.pmid: 28564312
references.citation: Evolution. 1987 Jul;41(4):760-771
references.pmid: 28564350
references.citation: Evolution. 1998 Dec;52(6):1583-1592
references.pmid: 28565335
references.citation: Evolution. 1999 Aug;53(4):1093-1104
references.pmid: 28565524