title: Retinal nerve fiber layer reflectometry must consider directional reflectance.
abstract: Recent studies reveal that measurements of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) reflectance provide more sensitive detection of glaucomatous damage than RNFL thickness, but most do not consider directional reflectance of the RNFL, an important source of variability. This study quantitatively compared RNFL directional reflectance, represented by an angular spread function (ASF), measured at different scattering angles, different wavelengths and different distances from the optic nerve head (ONH) and for bundles with different thicknesses (T). An ASF was characterized by its amplitude (A) and width (W). Internal reflectance of a bundle was expressed as A/T. The study found that A varied significantly with scattering angle and wavelength and that A/T was different among bundles but constant along the same bundle, indicating that the internal structure of axons may vary among bundles but does not change with distance. This study also found that W was larger near the ONH and at longer wavelengths, but did not depend on scattering angle or T. Because a 4.3° change in incident angle can change reflected intensity by a factor of 2.7, accounting for directional reflectance should improve the accuracy and reproducibility of RNFL reflectance measurements.
authors.affiliation: Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miller School of Medicine University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA.
authors.forename: Xiang-Run
authors.initials: XR
authors.lastname: Huang
authors.affiliation: Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miller School of Medicine University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA.
authors.forename: Robert W
authors.initials: RW
authors.lastname: Knighton
authors.affiliation: Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miller School of Medicine University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA.
authors.forename: William J
authors.initials: WJ
authors.lastname: Feuer
authors.affiliation: Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miller School of Medicine University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA.
authors.forename: Jianzhong
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Qiao
keywords: (170.3660) Light propagation in tissues; (170.4470) Ophthalmology; (170.4580) Optical diagnostics for medicine; (170.6935) Tissue characterization
references.citation: Exp Eye Res. 2009 Jun;88(6):1107-14
references.pmid: 19450448
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004 Sep;45(9):3073-80
references.pmid: 15326123
references.citation: Arch Ophthalmol. 1995 May;113(5):586-96
references.pmid: 7748128
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Aug 24;52(9):6737-42
references.pmid: 21730345
references.citation: Appl Opt. 1997 Apr 1;36(10):2273-85
references.pmid: 18253203
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017 Apr 1;58(4):2118-2129
references.pmid: 28395028
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999 Mar;40(3):639-47
references.pmid: 10067967
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008 Mar;49(3):986-99
references.pmid: 18326722
references.citation: Biomed Opt Express. 2015 Feb 26;6(3):1030-54
references.pmid: 25798324
references.citation: Arch Ophthalmol. 2005 Apr;123(4):464-70
references.pmid: 15824218
references.citation: J Glaucoma. 1999 Feb;8(1):31-7
references.pmid: 10084272
references.citation: J Biomed Opt. 2004 Jan-Feb;9(1):121-5
references.pmid: 14715063
references.citation: J Glaucoma. 2000 Feb;9(1):56-62
references.pmid: 10708233
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Sep 12;53(10):6102-8
references.pmid: 22893674
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998 Nov;39(12):2304-20
references.pmid: 9804139
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008 Jan;49(1):255-61
references.pmid: 18172100
references.citation: Arch Ophthalmol. 2000 Aug;118(8):1044-7
references.pmid: 10922196
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 May 02;52(6):2879-88
references.pmid: 21245391
references.citation: Cell Health Cytoskelet. 2014;6:1-10
references.pmid: 28943757
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 Mar;57(3):1221-7
references.pmid: 26978028
references.citation: Cancer Res. 2009 Feb 1;69(3):1199-204
references.pmid: 19141640
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Dec;46(12):4588-93
references.pmid: 16303953
references.citation: Mol Vis. 2009 Dec 05;15:2578-98
references.pmid: 20011633
references.citation: Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 1995 Apr;6(2):89-95
references.pmid: 10150863
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Apr 30;53(4):2424-30
references.pmid: 22427540
references.citation: Science. 1991 Nov 22;254(5035):1178-81
references.pmid: 1957169
references.citation: Brain Res. 2004 Jul 9;1013(2):241-8
references.pmid: 15193534
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003 Jul;44(7):3005-10
references.pmid: 12824245
references.citation: J Glaucoma. 1995 Apr;4(2):117-23
references.pmid: 19920656
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992 Aug;33(9):2603-11
references.pmid: 1639607
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2008 Mar 12;28(11):2735-44
references.pmid: 18337403
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 Dec;47(12):5363-7
references.pmid: 17122125
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012 Jul 01;53(8):4380-95
references.pmid: 22570345
references.citation: J Biomed Opt. 2010 Jul-Aug;15(4):040504
references.pmid: 20799771
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1998 Jan;39(1):189-93
references.pmid: 9430561
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 Feb;51(2):980-90
references.pmid: 19815738
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Mar 18;52(3):1486-92
references.pmid: 21071737