title: Nucleus Accumbens Core and Shell Differentially Encode Reward-Associated Cues after Reinforcer Devaluation.
abstract: Nucleus accumbens (NAc) neurons encode features of stimulus learning and action selection associated with rewards. The NAc is necessary for using information about expected outcome values to guide behavior after reinforcer devaluation. Evidence suggests that core and shell subregions may play dissociable roles in guiding motivated behavior. Here, we recorded neural activity in the NAc core and shell during training and performance of a reinforcer devaluation task. Long-Evans male rats were trained that presses on a lever under an illuminated cue light delivered a flavored sucrose reward. On subsequent test days, each rat was given free access to one of two distinctly flavored foods to consume to satiation and were then immediately tested on the lever pressing task under extinction conditions. Rats decreased pressing on the test day when the reinforcer earned during training was the sated flavor (devalued) compared with the test day when the reinforcer was not the sated flavor (nondevalued), demonstrating evidence of outcome-selective devaluation. Cue-selective encoding during training by NAc core (but not shell) neurons reliably predicted subsequent behavioral performance; that is, the greater the percentage of neurons that responded to the cue, the better the rats suppressed responding after devaluation. In contrast, NAc shell (but not core) neurons significantly decreased cue-selective encoding in the devalued condition compared with the nondevalued condition. These data reveal that NAc core and shell neurons encode information differentially about outcome-specific cues after reinforcer devaluation that are related to behavioral performance and outcome value, respectively.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Many neuropsychiatric disorders are marked by impairments in behavioral flexibility. Although the nucleus accumbens (NAc) is required for behavioral flexibility, it is not known how NAc neurons encode this information. Here, we recorded NAc neurons during a training session in which rats learned that a cue predicted a specific reward and during a test session when that reward value was changed. Although encoding in the core during training predicted the ability of rats to change behavior after the reward value was altered, the NAc shell encoded information about the change in reward value during the test session. These findings suggest differential roles of the core and shell in behavioral flexibility.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599.
authors.forename: Elizabeth A
authors.initials: EA
authors.lastname: West
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599 rcarelli@unc.edu.
authors.forename: Regina M
authors.initials: RM
authors.lastname: Carelli
mesh_terms: D000200:Action Potentials / Q000502:physiology; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D000818:Animals; D003216:Conditioning, Operant / Q000502:physiology; D003463:Cues; D008297:Male; D009433:Neural Inhibition / Q000502:physiology; D009474:Neurons / Q000502:physiology*; D009714:Nucleus Accumbens / Q000166:cytology / Q000502:physiology*; D051381:Rats; D020318:Rats, Long-Evans; D012201:Reward
keywords: accumbens; behavior; devaluation; electrophysiology; motivation; rat
references.citation: Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2014 Feb;108:22-7
references.pmid: 23770491
references.citation: Brain Res. 2002 Mar 8;929(2):226-35
references.pmid: 11864628
references.citation: Neuroscience. 2010 Sep 1;169(3):1186-98
references.pmid: 20570714
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2011 Oct 19;31(42):15128-35
references.pmid: 22016546
references.citation: Front Syst Neurosci. 2015 Jun 15;9:90
references.pmid: 26124708
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2012 Jan 22;15(3):358-66
references.pmid: 22267164
references.citation: Eur J Neurosci. 2012 Aug;36(4):2521-32
references.pmid: 22780554
references.citation: Behav Neurosci. 2005 Feb;119(1):317-22
references.pmid: 15727536
references.citation: Synapse. 2000 Mar 1;35(3):238-42
references.pmid: 10657032
references.citation: Eur J Neurosci. 2011 Jan;33(2):308-21
references.pmid: 21198983
references.citation: Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2003 Oct;27(6):555-79
references.pmid: 14599436
references.citation: Eur J Neurosci. 2004 Jan;19(1):181-9
references.pmid: 14750976
references.citation: Front Biosci (Elite Ed). 2013 Jan 01;5(1):273-88
references.pmid: 23276989
references.citation: Eur J Neurosci. 2009 Aug;30(3):464-71
references.pmid: 19614748
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2014 Oct 15;34(42):14147-62
references.pmid: 25319709
references.citation: Brain Res. 2001 Jul 13;907(1-2):156-61
references.pmid: 11430899
references.citation: Neuron. 2013 Jul 24;79(2):361-74
references.pmid: 23810540
references.citation: Neuron. 2003 May 22;38(4):625-36
references.pmid: 12765613
references.citation: Eur J Neurosci. 2011 Jun;33(12):2274-87
references.pmid: 21507084
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2006 Jan 4;26(1):217-22
references.pmid: 16399690
references.citation: Learn Mem. 2010 Oct 22;17(11):539-46
references.pmid: 20971936
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2007 Aug 1;27(31):8166-9
references.pmid: 17670960
references.citation: Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013 Nov;37(9 Pt A):1932-45
references.pmid: 23220696
references.citation: Brain Res. 1986 Mar 12;368(1):79-86
references.pmid: 3955366
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2011 Oct 30;14(12):1590-7
references.pmid: 22037501
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2010 Mar 31;30(13):4746-56
references.pmid: 20357125
references.citation: J Neurosci Methods. 1980 Dec;3(2):129-49
references.pmid: 6110810
references.citation: Neuropharmacology. 2004;47 Suppl 1:180-9
references.pmid: 15464136
references.citation: Neuroscience. 2005;136(4):1049-71
references.pmid: 16226842
references.citation: Behav Neurosci. 2012 Aug;126(4):563-74
references.pmid: 22845705
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2008 Dec;11(12):1376-7
references.pmid: 18978779
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2009 Oct 21;29(42):13365-76
references.pmid: 19846724
references.citation: Biol Psychiatry. 2014 Jan 15;75(2):156-64
references.pmid: 24035479
references.citation: Learn Mem. 2007 Aug 29;14(9):581-9
references.pmid: 17761543
references.citation: Biol Psychiatry. 2015 May 15;77(10):903-911
references.pmid: 25541492
references.citation: Neurosci Lett. 2008 Feb 13;432(1):40-5
references.pmid: 18248891
references.citation: Biol Psychiatry. 2014 May 15;75(10):807-816
references.pmid: 24143880
references.citation: Behav Brain Res. 2002 Dec 2;137(1-2):149-63
references.pmid: 12445721
references.citation: Brain Res Bull. 1982 Jul-Dec;9(1-6):321-53
references.pmid: 6816390
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2001 May 1;21(9):3251-60
references.pmid: 11312310
references.citation: Prog Neurobiol. 1980;14(2-3):69-97
references.pmid: 6999537
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2007 Mar 28;27(13):3535-9
references.pmid: 17392469
references.citation: Addiction. 2004 Dec;99(12):1491-502
references.pmid: 15585037
references.citation: Front Integr Neurosci. 2010 Oct 20;4:126
references.pmid: 21088698
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1995 Oct;15(10):6779-88
references.pmid: 7472436
references.citation: Brain Res. 2000 Jun 2;866(1-2):44-54
references.pmid: 10825479
references.citation: Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2004 Jan;27(8):765-76
references.pmid: 15019426
references.citation: Neuron. 2008 Aug 28;59(4):648-61
references.pmid: 18760700
references.citation: Behav Brain Res. 1997 Dec;89(1-2):107-13
references.pmid: 9475619
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2011 Aug 17;31(33):11786-94
references.pmid: 21849539
references.citation: Neuroscientist. 2007 Apr;13(2):148-59
references.pmid: 17404375
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007 Dec;1121:273-96
references.pmid: 17846154
references.citation: Eur J Neurosci. 2010 Nov;32(10):1735-43
references.pmid: 21044174
references.citation: Neuron. 2008 Mar 13;57(5):774-85
references.pmid: 18341996
references.citation: Nat Commun. 2013;4:2264
references.pmid: 23921250
references.citation: Behav Brain Res. 2013 Jun 1;246:10-4
references.pmid: 23458741
references.citation: Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2011 Mar;11(1):97-112
references.pmid: 21264647
references.citation: Eur J Neurosci. 2014 Jun;39(11):1891-902
references.pmid: 24690012
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2011 May 4;31(18):6820-30
references.pmid: 21543612
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2015 Aug 19;35(33):11572-82
references.pmid: 26290234
references.citation: J Neurosci Methods. 2011 Jan 15;194(2):297-304
references.pmid: 21093482
references.citation: Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2010 Feb;93(2):283-90
references.pmid: 19931626
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2007 Aug;10(8):1020-8
references.pmid: 17603481
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2011 Sep 28;31(39):13860-9
references.pmid: 21957248
references.citation: Eur J Neurosci. 2006 Mar;23(5):1341-51
references.pmid: 16553795
references.citation: Neuron. 2013 Jun 5;78(5):910-22
references.pmid: 23764290
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2003 Dec 3;23(35):11078-84
references.pmid: 14657165
references.citation: Neuropharmacology. 2014 Jan;76 Pt B:407-15
references.pmid: 23752095
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2005 Aug 24;25(34):7763-70
references.pmid: 16120777