title: Vesicoureteral reflux and bladder dysfunction.
abstract: The relationship between vesicoureteral reflux and bladder dysfunction is inseparable and has long been emphasized. However, the primary concern of all physicians treating patients with vesicoureteral reflux is the prevention of renal scarring and eventual deterioration of renal function. Bladder dysfunction, urinary tract infection and vesicoureteral reflux are the three important factors which are closely related to each other and contribute to the formation of renal scar. Especially, there is ongoing discussion regarding the role of bladder dysfunction in the prognosis of both medically and surgically treated vesicoureteral reflux. The effect of bladder dysfunction on VUR is mostly via inadequate sphincter relaxation during infancy which is closer to immature bladder dyscoordination rather than true dysfunction. But after toilet training, functional obstruction caused by voluntary sphincter constriction during voiding is responsible through elevation in bladder pressure, thus distorting the architecture of bladder and ureterovesical junction. Reports suggest that voiding phase abnormalities in lower urinary tract dysfunction contributes to lower spontaneous resolution rate of VUR. However, filling phase abnormalities such as involuntary detrusor contraction can also cause VUR even in the absence of dysfunctional voiding. With regards to the effect of bladder dysfunction on treatment, meta-analysis reveals that the cure rate of VUR following endoscopic treatment is less in children with bladder bowel dysfunction but there is no difference for open surgery. The pathophysiology of bladder dysfunction associated with UTI can be explained by the 'milk-back' of contaminated urine back into the bladder and significant residual urine resulting from functional outlet obstruction. In addition, involuntary detrusor contraction can decrease perfusion of the bladder mucosa thus decreasing mucosal immunity and creating a condition prone to UTI. In terms of renal scarring, dysfunctional voiding seems to be more closely related to renal damage in association with VUR than overactive bladder. However, studies show that UTI can induce renal scarring even without VUR present and urodynamic abnormalities are quite often detected in these cases. Whether reflux of sterile urine in bladder dysfunction can cause significant renal scarring, especially when intrarenal reflux is present remains controversial. Another issue that warrants further research is the direct relationship between bladder dysfunction and renal scarring, since some reports suggest that these two conditions share a common genotype. Recently some studies have suggest VUR as a causal factor of bladder dysfunction, supported by the fact that bladder dysfunction resolves after injection therapy of VUR. Further study with more objective evaluation of bladder dysfunction may be needed.
authors.affiliation: Department of Urology and Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
authors.forename: Hyeyoung
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Lee
authors.affiliation: Department of Urology and Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
authors.forename: Yong Seung
authors.initials: YS
authors.lastname: Lee
authors.affiliation: Department of Urology and Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
authors.forename: Young Jae
authors.initials: YJ
authors.lastname: Im
authors.affiliation: Department of Urology and Urological Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
authors.forename: Sang Won
authors.initials: SW
authors.lastname: Han
keywords: Vesicoureteral reflux; bladder dysfunction; urinary tract infection
references.citation: J Urol. 1985 Jun;133(6):1068-75
references.pmid: 2860250
references.citation: J Urol. 1987 Feb;137(2):240-4
references.pmid: 3806811
references.citation: J Urol. 2007 Mar;177(3):1124-8; discussion 1128-9
references.pmid: 17296428
references.citation: J Urol. 1985 Dec;134(6):1172-5
references.pmid: 4057410
references.citation: Pediatr Int. 2000 Aug;42(4):348-53
references.pmid: 10986863
references.citation: Br J Urol. 1998 May;81 Suppl 3:109-13
references.pmid: 9634033
references.citation: J Urol. 2010 Sep;184(3):1134-44
references.pmid: 20650499
references.citation: J Urol. 1989 Apr;141(4):916-7
references.pmid: 2564443
references.citation: J Pediatr. 2000 Jun;136(6):754-9
references.pmid: 10839872
references.citation: J Urol. 1988 Nov;140(5 Pt 2):1097-100
references.pmid: 3184282
references.citation: Br J Radiol. 1975;Suppl 13:1-26
references.pmid: 766885
references.citation: J Urol. 2010 Jul;184(1):298-304
references.pmid: 20488486
references.citation: Pediatr Nephrol. 1999 Aug;13(6):514-8
references.pmid: 10452281
references.citation: J Pediatr. 2007 Dec;151(6):581-4, 584.e1
references.pmid: 18035134
references.citation: Urology. 1994 May;43(5):708-12; discussion 712-3
references.pmid: 8165772
references.citation: Pediatr Nephrol. 2006 Sep;21(9):1281-4
references.pmid: 16791609
references.citation: J Urol. 1992 Nov;148(5 Pt 2):1703-5
references.pmid: 1433592
references.citation: J Urol. 1976 Nov;116(5):638-43
references.pmid: 978818
references.citation: Am Fam Physician. 1988 Jul;38(1):101-12
references.pmid: 3394597
references.citation: J Urol. 1998 Sep;160(3 Pt 2):1019-22
references.pmid: 9719268
references.citation: Pediatr Nephrol. 2004 Aug;19(8):853-7
references.pmid: 15179569
references.citation: J Urol. 1982 Sep;128(3):650-2
references.pmid: 7120583
references.citation: J Urol. 1983 Sep;130(3):602-6
references.pmid: 6411937
references.citation: Adv Urol. 2008;:815472
references.pmid: 19009037
references.citation: J Urol. 1990 Aug;144(2 Pt 2):537-40; discussion 545
references.pmid: 2374236
references.citation: BJU Int. 2001 Apr;87(6):581-4
references.pmid: 11298062
references.citation: J Urol. 1998 Nov;160(5):1823-5
references.pmid: 9783967
references.citation: Trans Am Assoc Genitourin Surg. 1972;64:116-21
references.pmid: 4654515
references.citation: Pediatrics. 1981 Mar;67(3):392-400
references.pmid: 7017578