title: High richness of ectomycorrhizal fungi and low host specificity in a coastal sand dune ecosystem revealed by network analysis.
abstract: Ectomycorrhizal (EM) fungi are ubiquitous in temperate and boreal forests, comprising over 20,000 species forming root symbiotic associations with Pinaceae and woody angiosperms. As much as 100 different EM fungal species can coexist and interact with the same tree species, forming complex multispecies networks in soils. The degree of host specificity and structural properties of these interaction networks (e.g., nestedness and modularity) may influence plant and fungal community assembly and species coexistence, yet their structure has been little studied in northern coniferous forests, where trees depend on EM fungi for nutrient acquisition. We used high-throughput sequencing to characterize the composition and diversity of bulk soil and root-associated fungal communities in four co-occurring Pinaceae in a relic foredune plain located at Îles de la Madeleine, Québec, Canada. We found high EM fungal richness across the four hosts, with a total of 200 EM operational taxonomic units (OTUs), mainly belonging to the Agaricomycetes. Network analysis revealed an antinested pattern in both bulk soil and roots EM fungal communities. However, there was no detectable modularity (i.e., subgroups of interacting species) in the interaction networks, indicating a low level of specificity in these EM associations. In addition, there were no differences in EM fungal OTU richness or community structure among the four tree species. Limited shared resources and competitive exclusion typically restrict the number of taxa coexisting within the same niche. As such, our finding of high EM fungal richness and low host specificity highlights the need for further studies to determine the mechanisms enabling such a large number of EM fungal species to coexist locally on the same hosts.
authors.affiliation: Département de Sciences Biologiques Institut de Recherche en Biologie Végétale Université de Montréal 4101 Sherbrooke Est Montréal Québec Canada H1X 2B2.
authors.forename: Alice
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Roy-Bolduc
authors.affiliation: Département de Sciences Biologiques Institut de Recherche en Biologie Végétale Université de Montréal 4101 Sherbrooke Est Montréal Québec Canada H1X 2B2.
authors.forename: Etienne
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Laliberté
authors.affiliation: Département de Sciences Biologiques Institut de Recherche en Biologie Végétale Université de Montréal 4101 Sherbrooke Est Montréal Québec Canada H1X 2B2.
authors.forename: Mohamed
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Hijri
keywords: 454 sequencing; coastal sand dunes; ectomycorrhizal fungal community; host preference; network analysis; plant–fungal interactions
references.citation: Ecology. 2012 Dec;93(12):2533-47
references.pmid: 23431585
references.citation: Nature. 2008 May 1;453(7191):98-101
references.pmid: 18451861
references.citation: Nature. 2009 Apr 23;458(7241):1018-20
references.pmid: 19396144
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Aug 5;100(16):9383-7
references.pmid: 12881488
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2001 Aug;10(8):1855-71
references.pmid: 11555231
references.citation: New Phytol. 2015 May;206(3):1127-34
references.pmid: 25614926
references.citation: Mycorrhiza. 2013 Nov;23(8):641-53
references.pmid: 23702643
references.citation: New Phytol. 2012 Apr;194(2):536-47
references.pmid: 22269207
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2002 Mar;11(3):571-81
references.pmid: 11928709
references.citation: New Phytol. 2009;182(2):295-9
references.pmid: 19302178
references.citation: Genome Res. 2003 Nov;13(11):2498-504
references.pmid: 14597658
references.citation: New Phytol. 2009 Nov;184(3):657-67
references.pmid: 19761493
references.citation: J Theor Biol. 2007 Nov 21;249(2):307-13
references.pmid: 17897679
references.citation: New Phytol. 2012 Apr;194(2):307-12
references.pmid: 22269121
references.citation: New Phytol. 2011 Jul;191(2):314-8
references.pmid: 21557749
references.citation: Nature. 2005 Feb 24;433(7028):895-900
references.pmid: 15729348
references.citation: Mycorrhiza. 2006 May;16(3):197-206
references.pmid: 16518613
references.citation: Mycorrhiza. 2005 Sep;15(6):393-403
references.pmid: 16021480
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2012 Dec;82(3):666-77
references.pmid: 22738186
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Mar 1;108(9):3648-52
references.pmid: 21307311
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2015 Aug;18(8):807-16
references.pmid: 26032408
references.citation: Ecology. 2009 Dec;90(12):3566-74
references.pmid: 20120823
references.citation: Nat Methods. 2010 May;7(5):335-6
references.pmid: 20383131
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2009 Aug;69(2):274-87
references.pmid: 19508503
references.citation: New Phytol. 2013 Jun;198(4):1228-38
references.pmid: 23496225
references.citation: F1000Res. 2014 Aug 06;3:185
references.pmid: 25485095
references.citation: BMC Bioinformatics. 2012 May 30;13:113
references.pmid: 22646978
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2011 Jan;14(1):19-28
references.pmid: 21070562
references.citation: New Phytol. 2013 Aug;199(3):822-31
references.pmid: 23692134
references.citation: New Phytol. 2007;174(2):430-40
references.pmid: 17388905
references.citation: Environ Microbiol Rep. 2015 Dec;7(6):839-48
references.pmid: 26109372
references.citation: Science. 2010 Aug 13;329(5993):853-6
references.pmid: 20705861
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2010 Oct 1;26(19):2460-1
references.pmid: 20709691
references.citation: ISME J. 2014 Feb;8(2):331-43
references.pmid: 23985744
references.citation: New Phytol. 2008;178(1):167-76
references.pmid: 18194145
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009 Dec;75(23):7537-41
references.pmid: 19801464
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2013 Nov;22(21):5271-7
references.pmid: 24112409
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2007 Nov;62(2):142-60
references.pmid: 17892477
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000 Nov;66(11):4988-91
references.pmid: 11055953
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 1993 Apr;2(2):113-8
references.pmid: 8180733
references.citation: New Phytol. 2005 Jan;165(1):295-304
references.pmid: 15720641
references.citation: New Phytol. 2015 Mar;205(4):1406-23
references.pmid: 25639293
references.citation: Science. 2014 Nov 28;346(6213):1256688
references.pmid: 25430773
references.citation: ISME J. 2010 Apr;4(4):465-71
references.pmid: 19956273
references.citation: J Anim Ecol. 2010 Jul;79(4):811-7
references.pmid: 20374411