title: Targeted Cooperative Actions Shape Social Networks.
abstract: Individual acts of cooperation give rise to dynamic social networks. Traditionally, models for cooperation in structured populations are based on a separation of individual strategies and of population structure. Individuals adopt a strategy-typically cooperation or defection, which determines their behaviour toward their neighbours as defined by an interaction network. Here, we report a behavioural experiment that amalgamates strategies and structure to empirically investigate the dynamics of social networks. The action of paying a cost c to provide a benefit b is represented as a directed link point from the donor to the recipient. Participants can add and/or remove links to up to two recipients in each round. First, we show that dense networks emerge, where individuals are characterized by fairness: they receive to the same extent they provide. More specifically, we investigate how participants use information about the generosity and payoff of others to update their links. It turns out that aversion to payoff inequity was the most consistent update rule: adding links to individuals that are worse off and removing links to individuals that are better off. We then investigate the effect of direct reciprocation, showing that the possibility of direct reciprocation does not increase cooperation as compared to the treatment where participants are totally unaware of who is providing benefits to them.
authors.affiliation: Department of Mathematics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
authors.forename: Lucas
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Wardil
authors.affiliation: Department of Mathematics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
authors.forename: Christoph
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Hauert
mesh_terms: D003299:Cooperative Behavior; D005716:Game Theory; D006801:Humans; D060756:Social Networking; D012944:Social Support
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Apr 7;268(1468):761-9
references.pmid: 11321066
references.citation: Nature. 2015 Oct 15;526(7573):426-9
references.pmid: 26352469
references.citation: Nature. 1998 Jun 11;393(6685):573-7
references.pmid: 9634232
references.citation: Theor Popul Biol. 2006 May;69(3):243-52
references.pmid: 16427669
references.citation: Nature. 2006 May 25;441(7092):502-5
references.pmid: 16724065
references.citation: Science. 2006 Dec 8;314(5805):1560-3
references.pmid: 17158317
references.citation: Phys Rev Lett. 2006 Dec 22;97(25):258103
references.pmid: 17280398
references.citation: Science. 2009 Feb 13;323(5916):892-5
references.pmid: 19213908
references.citation: Biosystems. 2010 Feb;99(2):109-25
references.pmid: 19837129
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Feb 16;107(7):2962-6
references.pmid: 20142470
references.citation: PLoS One. 2010;5(11):e13749
references.pmid: 21103058
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Nov 29;108(48):19193-8
references.pmid: 22084103
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Aug 7;109(32):12922-6
references.pmid: 22773811
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Sep 4;109(36):14363-8
references.pmid: 22904193
references.citation: Behav Brain Sci. 2013 Feb;36(1):59-78
references.pmid: 23445574
references.citation: Nat Commun. 2013;4:2814
references.pmid: 24226079
references.citation: Sci Rep. 2014;4:4615
references.pmid: 24722557
references.citation: Sci Rep. 2014;4:5725
references.pmid: 25030202
references.citation: Science. 2014 Oct 17;346(6207):1251776
references.pmid: 25324394
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Dec 2;111(48):17093-8
references.pmid: 25404308
references.citation: Nature. 2003 Oct 23;425(6960):785-91
references.pmid: 14574401