title: Legal Professionals' Knowledge of Eyewitness Testimony in China: A Cross-Sectional Survey.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To examine legal professionals' knowledge of a wide range of factors that affect eyewitness accuracy in China.
  
  
  METHODS
  A total of 812 participants, including 210 judges, 244 prosecutors, 202 police officers, and 156 defense attorneys, were asked to respond to 12 statements about eyewitness testimony and 3 basic demographic questions (i.e., gender, age, and prior experience).
  
  
  RESULTS
  Although the judges and the defense attorneys had a somewhat higher number of correct responses than the other two groups, all groups showed limited knowledge of eyewitness testimony. In addition, the participants' responses to only four items (i.e., weapon focus, attitude and expectations, child suggestibility, and the impact of stress) were roughly unanimous within the four legal professional groups. Legal professionals' gender showed no significant correlations with their knowledge of eyewitness testimony. Prior experiences were significantly and negatively correlated with the item on the knowledge of forgetting curve among judges but positively correlated with two items (i.e., attitudes and exposure time) among defense attorneys and with 4 statements (i.e., the knowledge of attitudes and expectations, impact of stress, child witness accuracy, and exposure time) among prosecutors.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The findings suggest that knowledge of the factors that influence eyewitness accuracy must be more effectively communicated to legal professionals in the future.
authors.affiliation: College of Humanities and Law, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou, PRC.
authors.forename: Lina
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Jiang
authors.affiliation: Institute of Evidence Law and Forensic Science, China University of Politics Science and Law, Beijing, PRC.
authors.forename: Dahua
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Luo
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D002681:China; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007603:Jurisprudence; D019359:Knowledge; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: J Appl Psychol. 1996 Feb;81(1):64-75
references.pmid: 8907146
references.citation: Law Hum Behav. 2003 Oct;27(5):523-40
references.pmid: 14593796
references.citation: Science. 2005 Aug 5;309(5736):892-5
references.pmid: 16081727
references.citation: J Soc Psychol. 1998 Jun;138(3):323-30
references.pmid: 9577722
references.citation: Am Psychol. 2001 May;56(5):405-16
references.pmid: 11355363
references.citation: J Appl Psychol. 1989 Oct;74(5):722-7
references.pmid: 2793772
references.citation: Law Hum Behav. 2004 Dec;28(6):687-706
references.pmid: 15732653
references.citation: Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2006 Nov;7(2):45-75
references.pmid: 26158855
references.citation: Behav Sci Law. 2005;23(5):709-27
references.pmid: 16170786