title: Institutions of care, moral proximity and demoralisation: The case of the emergency department.
abstract: This article draws on concepts of morality and demoralisation to understand the problematic nature of relationships between staff and patients in public health services. The article uses data from a case study of a UK hospital Emergency Department to show how staff are tasked with the responsibility of treating and caring for patients, while at the same time their actions are shaped by the institutional concerns of accountability and resource management. The data extracts illustrate how such competing agendas create a tension for staff to manage and suggests that, as a consequence of this tension, staff participate in processes of 'effacement' that limit the presence of patients and families as a moral demand. The analysis from the Emergency Department case study suggests that demoralisation is an increasingly important lens through which to understand health-care institutions, where contemporary organisational cultures challenge the ethical quality of human interaction.
authors.affiliation: School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University , 10 Museum Place, Cathays, Cardiff CF10 3BG, UK . E-mail: hillmanae1@cardiff.ac.uk.
authors.forename: Alexandra
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Hillman
keywords: demoralisation; emergency medicine; institutions of care; moral proximity
references.citation: Sociol Health Illn. 2014 May;36(4):485-99
references.pmid: 24053721
references.citation: Br J Gen Pract. 2010 Nov;60(580):860-1
references.pmid: 21062563
references.citation: Nurs Stand. 2015 Jan 20;29(20):7
references.pmid: 25585720
references.citation: Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Apr;13(2):130-5
references.pmid: 15069221
references.citation: Nurse Educ Today. 2013 Mar;33(3):181-2
references.pmid: 23453264
references.citation: Nurs Inq. 2004 Dec;11(4):218-25
references.pmid: 15601410
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2003 Jun;56(11):2317-26
references.pmid: 12719184
references.citation: Sociol Health Illn. 2007 Mar;29(2):163-79
references.pmid: 17381811
references.citation: Med Anthropol Q. 1999 Jun;13(2):186-213
references.pmid: 10440029
references.citation: AJS. 1972 Mar;77(5):839-56
references.pmid: 5067535
references.citation: Sociol Health Illn. 1983 Jul;5(2):127-48
references.pmid: 10299179
references.citation: Sociol Health Illn. 2008 Apr;30(3):333-48
references.pmid: 18419693
references.citation: Sociol Health Illn. 2008 Apr;30(3):349-63
references.pmid: 18194357
references.citation: Sociol Health Illn. 2006 Mar;28(2):178-202
references.pmid: 16509952
references.citation: Sociol Health Illn. 1979 Jun;1(1):90-107
references.pmid: 10250394
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2014 Dec;123:210-6
references.pmid: 25043559
references.citation: J Health Serv Res Policy. 2012 Apr;17 Suppl 2:30-6
references.pmid: 22572714
references.citation: Sociol Health Illn. 2013 Jul;35(6):939-55
references.pmid: 23356787
references.citation: Sociol Health Illn. 2014 Jun;36(5):703-18
references.pmid: 24641087