title: MetFrag relaunched: incorporating strategies beyond in silico fragmentation.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The in silico fragmenter MetFrag, launched in 2010, was one of the first approaches combining compound database searching and fragmentation prediction for small molecule identification from tandem mass spectrometry data. Since then many new approaches have evolved, as has MetFrag itself. This article details the latest developments to MetFrag and its use in small molecule identification since the original publication.
  
  
  RESULTS
  MetFrag has gone through algorithmic and scoring refinements. New features include the retrieval of reference, data source and patent information via ChemSpider and PubChem web services, as well as InChIKey filtering to reduce candidate redundancy due to stereoisomerism. Candidates can be filtered or scored differently based on criteria like occurence of certain elements and/or substructures prior to fragmentation, or presence in so-called "suspect lists". Retention time information can now be calculated either within MetFrag with a sufficient amount of user-provided retention times, or incorporated separately as "user-defined scores" to be included in candidate ranking. The changes to MetFrag were evaluated on the original dataset as well as a dataset of 473 merged high resolution tandem mass spectra (HR-MS/MS) and compared with another open source in silico fragmenter, CFM-ID. Using HR-MS/MS information only, MetFrag2.2 and CFM-ID had 30 and 43 Top 1 ranks, respectively, using PubChem as a database. Including reference and retention information in MetFrag2.2 improved this to 420 and 336 Top 1 ranks with ChemSpider and PubChem (89 and 71 %), respectively, and even up to 343 Top 1 ranks (PubChem) when combining with CFM-ID. The optimal parameters and weights were verified using three additional datasets of 824 merged HR-MS/MS spectra in total. Further examples are given to demonstrate flexibility of the enhanced features.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  In many cases additional information is available from the experimental context to add to small molecule identification, which is especially useful where the mass spectrum alone is not sufficient for candidate selection from a large number of candidates. The results achieved with MetFrag2.2 clearly show the benefit of considering this additional information. The new functions greatly enhance the chance of identification success and have been incorporated into a command line interface in a flexible way designed to be integrated into high throughput workflows. Feedback on the command line version of MetFrag2.2 available at http://c-ruttkies.github.io/MetFrag/ is welcome.
authors.affiliation: Leibniz Institute of Plant Biochemistry, Department of Stress and Developmental Biology, Weinberg 3, 06120 Halle, Germany.
authors.forename: Christoph
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Ruttkies
authors.affiliation: Eawag: Swiss Federal Institute for Aquatic Science and Technology, Überlandstrasse 133, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland.
authors.forename: Emma L
authors.initials: EL
authors.lastname: Schymanski
authors.affiliation: Leibniz Institute of Plant Biochemistry, Department of Stress and Developmental Biology, Weinberg 3, 06120 Halle, Germany ; R&D NMR Software, Bruker BioSpin GmbH, Silberstreifen, 76287 Rheinstetten, Germany.
authors.forename: Sebastian
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Wolf
authors.affiliation: Eawag: Swiss Federal Institute for Aquatic Science and Technology, Überlandstrasse 133, 8600 Dübendorf, Switzerland ; Institute of Biogeochemistry and Pollutant Dynamics, ETH Zürich, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland.
authors.forename: Juliane
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Hollender
authors.affiliation: Leibniz Institute of Plant Biochemistry, Department of Stress and Developmental Biology, Weinberg 3, 06120 Halle, Germany.
authors.forename: Steffen
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Neumann
keywords: Compound identification; High resolution mass spectrometry; In silico fragmentation; Metabolomics; Structure elucidation
references.citation: Environ Sci Technol. 2014;48(3):1811-8
references.pmid: 24417318
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 Jan 1;34(Database issue):D354-7
references.pmid: 16381885
references.citation: BMC Bioinformatics. 2010 Mar 22;11:148
references.pmid: 20307295
references.citation: Curr Pharm Des. 2006;12(17):2111-20
references.pmid: 16796559
references.citation: J Pharm Sci. 2009 Mar;98(3):861-93
references.pmid: 18683876
references.citation: Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2012 Oct 30;26(20):2461-71
references.pmid: 22976213
references.citation: Talanta. 2015 Jul 1;139:143-9
references.pmid: 25882420
references.citation: J Mass Spectrom. 2013 Mar;48(3):291-8
references.pmid: 23494783
references.citation: J Chromatogr A. 2009 Jan 16;1216(3):510-9
references.pmid: 18771771
references.citation: Metabolomics. 2015;11(3):696-706
references.pmid: 25972771
references.citation: J Mass Spectrom. 2010 Jul;45(7):703-14
references.pmid: 20623627
references.citation: Anal Chem. 2013 Nov 5;85(21):10330-7
references.pmid: 24053138
references.citation: Metabolites. 2013 May 24;3(2):412-39
references.pmid: 24957999
references.citation: J Cheminform. 2013 Jan 24;5(1):7
references.pmid: 23343401
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Oct 13;112(41):12580-5
references.pmid: 26392543
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2012 Sep 15;28(18):2333-41
references.pmid: 22815355
references.citation: Anal Chem. 2006 Feb 1;78(3):779-87
references.pmid: 16448051
references.citation: Anal Chem. 2009 May 1;81(9):3608-17
references.pmid: 19323534
references.citation: Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2015 Aug 30;29(16):1521-9
references.pmid: 26212167
references.citation: Anal Chem. 2014 Nov 4;86(21):10724-31
references.pmid: 25263576
references.citation: Mass Spectrom (Tokyo). 2014;3(Spec Iss 2):S0039
references.pmid: 26819882
references.citation: J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2012 Jan;23(1):179-85
references.pmid: 22069037
references.citation: Mass Spectrom (Tokyo). 2014;3(Spec Iss 2):S0033
references.pmid: 26819876
references.citation: J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 2003 Mar-Apr;43(2):493-500
references.pmid: 12653513
references.citation: Anal Bioanal Chem. 2014 Nov;406(28):7323-35
references.pmid: 25258286
references.citation: J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2011 Feb;22(2):348-59
references.pmid: 21472594
references.citation: Environ Sci Technol. 2009 Sep 15;43(18):7039-46
references.pmid: 19806739
references.citation: Anal Chem. 2008 Jul 15;80(14):5574-82
references.pmid: 18547062
references.citation: J Mass Spectrom. 2013 Jan;48(1):89-99
references.pmid: 23303751
references.citation: Anal Chem. 2012 Sep 4;84(17):7274-82
references.pmid: 22803687
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Jan;41(Database issue):D801-7
references.pmid: 23161693
references.citation: Anal Bioanal Chem. 2015 Aug;407(21):6237-55
references.pmid: 25976391
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 2000 Jan 1;28(1):27-30
references.pmid: 10592173
references.citation: Environ Pollut. 2014 Jan;184:25-32
references.pmid: 24012788
references.citation: J Chem Inf Model. 2007 Nov-Dec;47(6):2140-8
references.pmid: 17985865
references.citation: Anal Chem. 2012 Apr 3;84(7):3287-95
references.pmid: 22414024
references.citation: J Chromatogr A. 2011 Nov 11;1218(45):8192-6
references.pmid: 21968343