title: Neural representation of object-specific attentional priority.
abstract: Humans can flexibly select locations, features, or objects in a visual scene for prioritized processing. Although it is relatively straightforward to manipulate location- and feature-based attention, it is difficult to isolate object-based selection. Because objects are always composed of features, studies of object-based selection can often be interpreted as the selection of a combination of locations and features. Here we examined the neural representation of attentional priority in a paradigm that isolated object-based selection. Participants viewed two superimposed gratings that continuously changed their color, orientation, and spatial frequency, such that the gratings traversed the same exact feature values within a trial. Participants were cued at the beginning of each trial to attend to one or the other grating to detect a brief luminance increment, while their brain activity was measured with fMRI. Using multi-voxel pattern analysis, we were able to decode the attended grating in a set of frontoparietal areas, including anterior intraparietal sulcus (IPS), frontal eye field (FEF), and inferior frontal junction (IFJ). Thus, a perceptually varying object can be represented by patterned neural activity in these frontoparietal areas. We suggest that these areas can encode attentional priority for abstract, high-level objects independent of their locations and features.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA; Neuroscience Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA. Electronic address: tsliu@msu.edu.
authors.forename: Taosheng
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Liu
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology*; D001921:Brain / Q000502:physiology*; D001931:Brain Mapping; D003463:Cues; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008297:Male; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology*
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2004 Jan;91(1):152-62
references.pmid: 13679398
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 1984 Dec;113(4):501-17
references.pmid: 6240521
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2011 May;14(5):656-61
references.pmid: 21441920
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2004 Dec;14(12):1346-57
references.pmid: 15166105
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2014 Sep;17(9):1255-62
references.pmid: 25108910
references.citation: Annu Rev Neurosci. 2004;27:611-47
references.pmid: 15217345
references.citation: Annu Rev Neurosci. 1995;18:193-222
references.pmid: 7605061
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 1993 Mar-Apr;3(2):79-94
references.pmid: 8490322
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2005 Nov 15;28(3):635-62
references.pmid: 16172003
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 Mar;3(3):201-15
references.pmid: 11994752
references.citation: Spat Vis. 1988;3(3):179-97
references.pmid: 3153671
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2013 Aug 15;77:157-65
references.pmid: 23558095
references.citation: Vision Res. 2004 Mar;44(6):621-42
references.pmid: 14693189
references.citation: Science. 2014 Apr 25;344(6182):424-7
references.pmid: 24763592
references.citation: Nature. 2003 Jan 23;421(6921):370-3
references.pmid: 12540901
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2005 May;8(5):679-85
references.pmid: 15852014
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 1997 Mar;7(2):181-92
references.pmid: 9087826
references.citation: Magn Reson Med. 2000 May;43(5):705-15
references.pmid: 10800036
references.citation: Neuron. 2007 Oct 25;56(2):366-83
references.pmid: 17964252
references.citation: Science. 2008 Jul 18;321(5887):414-7
references.pmid: 18635806
references.citation: Science. 2001 Jan 12;291(5502):312-6
references.pmid: 11209083
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Mar 19;93(6):2382-6
references.pmid: 8637882
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2010 Apr;14(4):172-9
references.pmid: 20171926
references.citation: Neuron. 2008 May 8;58(3):306-24
references.pmid: 18466742
references.citation: Annu Rev Neurosci. 2000;23:315-41
references.pmid: 10845067
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2015 Apr;25(4):1080-92
references.pmid: 24217991
references.citation: Nature. 2006 Sep 7;443(7107):85-8
references.pmid: 16936716
references.citation: Neuron. 2005 Aug 18;47(4):607-20
references.pmid: 16102542
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2011 Mar 23;31(12):4484-95
references.pmid: 21430149
references.citation: Annu Rev Neurosci. 2010;33:1-21
references.pmid: 20192813
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2012 Oct;50(12):2916-25
references.pmid: 22963835
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 1994 Jun;1(2):202-38
references.pmid: 24203471
references.citation: Vision Res. 2011 Jul 1;51(13):1484-525
references.pmid: 21549742
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2013 Oct 16;33(42):16606-16
references.pmid: 24133264
references.citation: Science. 1995 May 12;268(5212):889-93
references.pmid: 7754376
references.citation: Cognition. 2001 Jun;80(1-2):1-46
references.pmid: 11245838
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 1992 Apr;24(2):175-219
references.pmid: 1582172
references.citation: Neuron. 2007 Jul 19;55(2):301-12
references.pmid: 17640530
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2005 Aug;8(8):1102-9
references.pmid: 16025108
references.citation: Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91
references.pmid: 17695343
references.citation: Nature. 2000 Nov 9;408(6809):196-9
references.pmid: 11089972
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2006 Jun 6;16(11):1096-102
references.pmid: 16753563
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Mar 7;103(10):3863-8
references.pmid: 16537458
references.citation: Nature. 1999 Oct 7;401(6753):584-7
references.pmid: 10524624