title: A conserved pattern in plant-mediated interactions between herbivores.
abstract: Plant-mediated interactions between herbivores are important determinants of community structure and plant performance in natural and agricultural systems. Current research suggests that the outcome of the interactions is determined by herbivore and plant identity, which may result in stochastic patterns that impede adaptive evolution and agricultural exploitation. However, few studies have systemically investigated specificity versus general patterns in a given plant system by varying the identity of all involved players. We investigated the influence of herbivore identity and plant genotype on the interaction between leaf-chewing and root-feeding herbivores in maize using a partial factorial design. We assessed the influence of leaf induction by oral secretions of six different chewing herbivores on the response of nine different maize genotypes and three different root feeders. Contrary to our expectations, we found a highly conserved pattern across all three dimensions of specificity: The majority of leaf herbivores elicited a negative behavioral response from the different root feeders in the large majority of tested plant genotypes. No facilitation was observed in any of the treatment combinations. However, the oral secretions of one leaf feeder and the responses of two maize genotypes did not elicit a response from a root-feeding herbivore. Together, these results suggest that plant-mediated interactions in the investigated system follow a general pattern, but that a degree of specificity is nevertheless present. Our study shows that within a given plant species, plant-mediated interactions between herbivores of the same feeding guild can be stable. This stability opens up the possibility of adaptations by associated organisms and suggests that plant-mediated interactions may contribute more strongly to evolutionary dynamics in terrestrial (agro)ecosystems than previously assumed.
authors.affiliation: Root Herbivore Interactions Group Department of Biochemistry Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology Hans-Knöll-Str. 2107745 Jena Germany; Institute of Insect Sciences Zhejiang University Zijingang Campus, Yuhangtang Road 866 Hangzhou 310058 China.
authors.forename: Jing
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Lu
authors.affiliation: Root Herbivore Interactions Group Department of Biochemistry Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology Hans-Knöll-Str. 2107745 Jena Germany; Institute of Plant Sciences University of Bern Altenbergrain 213013 Bern Switzerland.
authors.forename: Christelle A M
authors.initials: CA
authors.lastname: Robert
authors.affiliation: Institute of Insect Sciences Zhejiang University Zijingang Campus, Yuhangtang Road 866 Hangzhou 310058 China.
authors.forename: Yonggen
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Lou
authors.affiliation: Root Herbivore Interactions Group Department of Biochemistry Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology Hans-Knöll-Str. 2107745 Jena Germany; Institute of Plant Sciences University of Bern Altenbergrain 213013 Bern Switzerland.
authors.forename: Matthias
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Erb
keywords: Genetic variation; herbivory; indirect interactions; induced defense; plant resistance
references.citation: Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2008;59:41-66
references.pmid: 18031220
references.citation: Plant Cell Environ. 2013 Mar;36(3):621-39
references.pmid: 22913585
references.citation: Trends Plant Sci. 2008 Jun;13(6):264-72
references.pmid: 18487073
references.citation: Planta. 2010 Aug;232(3):719-29
references.pmid: 20563731
references.citation: Plant J. 2007 Jan;49(1):16-26
references.pmid: 17144894
references.citation: Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2010 May 1;12(3):512-7
references.pmid: 20522188
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2012 Jan;15(1):55-64
references.pmid: 22070646
references.citation: Ecology. 2012 Oct;93(10):2208-15
references.pmid: 23185882
references.citation: Trends Plant Sci. 2013 Mar;18(3):149-56
references.pmid: 22989699
references.citation: Plant J. 2011 Dec;68(5):901-11
references.pmid: 21838747
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2015 Dec;169(4):2884-94
references.pmid: 26430225
references.citation: Plant J. 2009 Jul;59(2):292-302
references.pmid: 19392694
references.citation: New Phytol. 2013 Dec;200(4):1234-46
references.pmid: 23914830
references.citation: Nat Genet. 2012 Jun 03;44(7):808-11
references.pmid: 22660546
references.citation: Plant Cell Environ. 2015 Jun;38(6):1081-93
references.pmid: 25293400
references.citation: Nat Commun. 2014 Sep 22;5:4851
references.pmid: 25241651
references.citation: J Econ Entomol. 2011 Feb;104(1):299-307
references.pmid: 21404871
references.citation: New Phytol. 2011 Jan;189(1):308-20
references.pmid: 20840610
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2008 Jul;17(14):3352-65
references.pmid: 18565114
references.citation: New Phytol. 2012 Jun;194(4):1061-9
references.pmid: 22486361
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35498
references.pmid: 22545111
references.citation: Oecologia. 2014 May;175(1):187-98
references.pmid: 24448700
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2008 Mar;146(3):852-8
references.pmid: 18316640
references.citation: Oecologia. 2013 Dec;173(4):1387-96
references.pmid: 23807734
references.citation: Oecologia. 2005 May;143(4):566-77
references.pmid: 15791425
references.citation: Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2008 Aug;11(4):457-63
references.pmid: 18657469
references.citation: Oecologia. 2007 May;152(2):257-64
references.pmid: 17334787
references.citation: Science. 2009 Aug 7;325(5941):737-40
references.pmid: 19661427
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2007 Oct;10 (10 ):926-36
references.pmid: 17845293
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2007 Oct;10(10):977-94
references.pmid: 17855811