title: Preoperative planning of left-sided valve surgery with 3D computed tomography reconstruction models: sternotomy or a minimally invasive approach?
abstract: With the emergence of a new concept aimed at individualization of patient care, the focus will shift from whether a minimally invasive procedure is better than conventional treatment, to the question of which patients will benefit most from which technique? The superiority of minimally invasive valve surgery (MIVS) has not yet been proved. We believe that through better patient selection advantages of this technique can become more pronounced. In our current study, we evaluate the feasibility of 3D computed tomography (CT) imaging reconstruction in the preoperative planning of patients referred for MIVS.
  
  
  
  We retrospectively analysed all consecutive patients who were referred for minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIMVS) and minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MIAVR) to a single surgeon in a tertiary referral centre for MIVS between March 2014 and 2015. Prospective preoperative planning was done for all patients and was based on evaluations by a multidisciplinary heart-team, an echocardiography, conventional CT images and 3D CT reconstruction models.
  
  
  
  A total of 39 patients were included in our study; 16 for mitral valve surgery (MVS) and 23 patients for aortic valve replacement (AVR). Eleven patients (69%) within the MVS group underwent MIMVS. Five patients (31%) underwent conventional MVS. Findings leading to exclusion for MIMVS were a tortuous or slender femoro-iliac tract, calcification of the aortic bifurcation, aortic elongation and pericardial calcifications. Furthermore, 2 patients had a change of operative strategy based on preoperative planning. Seventeen (74%) patients in the AVR group underwent MIAVR. Six patients (26%) underwent conventional AVR. Indications for conventional AVR instead of MIAVR were an elongated ascending aorta, ascending aortic calcification and ascending aortic dilatation. One patient (6%) in the MIAVR group was converted to a sternotomy due to excessive intraoperative bleeding. Two mortalities were reported during conventional MVS. There were no mortalities reported in the MIMVS, MIAVR or conventional AVR group.
  
  
  
  Preoperative planning of minimally invasive left-sided valve surgery with 3D CT reconstruction models is a useful and feasible method to determine operative strategy and exclude patients ineligible for a minimally invasive approach, thus potentially preventing complications.
authors.affiliation: Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands.
authors.forename: Samuel
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Heuts
authors.affiliation: Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands.
authors.forename: Jos G
authors.initials: JG
authors.lastname: Maessen
authors.affiliation: Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands peyman.sardarinia@mumc.nl.
authors.forename: Peyman
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Sardari Nia
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001021:Aortic Valve / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000601:surgery; D005260:Female; D006349:Heart Valve Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000601:surgery*; D006350:Heart Valve Prosthesis; D019918:Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D021621:Imaging, Three-Dimensional; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D019060:Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures / Q000379:methods*; D008943:Mitral Valve / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000601:surgery; D011300:Preoperative Care / Q000379:methods*; D011446:Prospective Studies; D056346:Sternotomy / Q000379:methods*; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Q000379:methods*; D016896:Treatment Outcome
keywords: 3D imaging; Aortic valve; Minimally invasive surgery; Mitral valve; Preoperative planning
references.citation: Ann Thorac Surg. 2002 Feb;73(2):460-5; discussion 465-6
references.pmid: 11845860
references.citation: Circulation. 2003 Aug 5;108(5):628-35
references.pmid: 12900496
references.citation: Ann Thorac Surg. 2006 May;81(5):1599-604
references.pmid: 16631641
references.citation: Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 May;85(5):1544-9; discussion 1549-50
references.pmid: 18442535
references.citation: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008 Nov;34(5):943-52
references.pmid: 18829343
references.citation: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Mar;137(3):670-679.e5
references.pmid: 19258087
references.citation: Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Dec;88(6):1851-6
references.pmid: 19932248
references.citation: Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1991;5(3):137-43
references.pmid: 2025439
references.citation: Eur Heart J. 2010 Nov;31(22):2727-40
references.pmid: 20797981
references.citation: Nat Genet. 2011 Feb;43(2):121-6
references.pmid: 21217753
references.citation: Circulation. 2013 Jul 30;128(5):483-91
references.pmid: 23804253
references.citation: Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 Nov;2(6):733-8
references.pmid: 24349974
references.citation: Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Jan;4(1):62-6
references.pmid: 25694979
references.citation: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995 May;109(5):885-90; discussion 890-1
references.pmid: 7739248
references.citation: Ann Thorac Surg. 1996 Nov;62(5):1542-4
references.pmid: 8893611
references.citation: Ann Surg. 1997 Oct;226(4):421-6; discussion 427-8
references.pmid: 9351710