title: Distinguishing between acute appendicitis and appendiceal mucocele: is this possible preoperatively?
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Mucocele of the appendix is an infrequent event, characterized by a cystic dilatation of the lumen. It is often diagnosed clinically from signs and symptoms of acute appendicitis or, if it is asymptomatic, as an incidental finding during ultrasonography, computed tomography, or laparotomy.
  
  
  METHODS
  We evaluated the histological data of patients who were believed to have mucocele of the appendix. These patients (n = 23) were compared with sex- and age-matched control subjects (n = 79) with appendicitis.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The main reason for emergency surgery was lower right abdominal pain in 15 patients, and intestinal obstruction in three. Univariate analysis using sonography demonstrated that the larger appendiceal outer diameter was positively correlated with the diagnosis of appendiceal mucocele (p = 0.001) and the mean white blood cell count was negatively correlated (p = 0.023). In urine analysis, 41.7 % of the mucocele patients and 10 % of the appendicitis patients had microscopic hematuria, respectively (p = 0.019). An outer diameter of 10 mm or more was predictive of appendiceal mucocele diagnosis, with a sensitivity of 76.5 %, specificity of 81 %, positive predictive value of 76.5 %, and negative predictive value of 94.12 %. The overall diagnostic accuracy was 80.2 %. One point was given for the presence of each of these factors to develop a new score. The resulting area under the receiver operator characteristic curve was 0.855 (95 % CI 0.741-0.969) for the score. The histological examination of the specimens revealed mucocele in 15 cases, mucinous cystadenoma in seven cases and mucinous cystadenocarcinoma in one case. Twenty patients underwent appendectomy, and three patients were treated with right colectomy.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  A threshold 10-mm diameter of the appendix under compression is a useful preoperative measurement for differentiating between appendiceal mucocele and acute appendicitis. Microhematuria is simple test that can provide a significant role in supporting the clinical diagnosis of appendiceal mucocele in the emergency department.
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgery, Ankara Numune Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. mdbsaylam@yahoo.com.|Genel Cerrahi Kliniği, Ankara Numune Hastanesi, Talatpaşa Bulvarı, 06100, Altındağ, Ankara, Turkey. mdbsaylam@yahoo.com.
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Saylam
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgery, Ankara Numune Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. drguldogan@gmail.com.
authors.forename: C E
authors.initials: CE
authors.lastname: Güldoğan
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgery, Ankara Numune Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. farukcoskun@mynet.com.
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Coşkun
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgery, Ankara Numune Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. velivural1980@hotmail.com.
authors.forename: V
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Vural
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgery, Ankara Numune Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. bulentcomcali@hotmail.com.
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Çomçalı
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgery, Ankara Numune Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey. mesuttez@yahoo.com.
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Tez
keywords: Appendicitis; Microhematuria; Mucocele of the appendix; Score
references.citation: Yale J Biol Med. 2001 Jan-Feb;74(1):9-12
references.pmid: 11249237
references.citation: Br J Surg. 2004 Jan;91(1):28-37
references.pmid: 14716790
references.citation: Hinyokika Kiyo. 1985 Oct;31(10):1723-5
references.pmid: 4091121
references.citation: Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2012 Sep;94(6):395-401
references.pmid: 22943328
references.citation: JSLS. 1999 Jan-Mar;3(1):71-4
references.pmid: 10323174
references.citation: Abdom Imaging. 2003 Jan-Feb;28(1):15-8
references.pmid: 12483378
references.citation: Urology. 1991 Nov;38(5):432-6
references.pmid: 1949453
references.citation: JAMA. 1986 Jul 11;256(2):224-9
references.pmid: 3723707
references.citation: Urology. 2004 May;63(5):981-2
references.pmid: 15135001
references.citation: Int J Urol. 2001 Apr;8(4):196-8
references.pmid: 11260355
references.citation: Br J Urol. 1989 Feb;63(2):218-9
references.pmid: 2702418
references.citation: World J Gastroenterol. 2005 Aug 14;11(30):4761-3
references.pmid: 16094726
references.citation: World J Surg. 2007 Mar;31(3):542-8
references.pmid: 17318706
references.citation: Am J Emerg Med. 2006 Nov;24(7):801-5
references.pmid: 17098100
references.citation: Radiology. 2004 Feb;230(2):472-8
references.pmid: 14688403
references.citation: Am J Epidemiol. 1990 Nov;132(5):910-25
references.pmid: 2239906
references.citation: Abdom Imaging. 1998 May-Jun;23 (3):292-6
references.pmid: 9569300
references.citation: Br J Urol. 1998 Sep;82(3):444-5
references.pmid: 9772888
references.citation: Br J Surg. 1998 Oct;85(10):1332-9
references.pmid: 9782010