title: Simulations of a Vibrissa Slipping along a Straight Edge and an Analysis of Frictional Effects during Whisking.
abstract: During tactile exploration, rats sweep their whiskers against objects in a motion called whisking. Here, we investigate how a whisker slips along an object's edge and how friction affects the resulting tactile signals. First, a frictionless model is developed to simulate whisker slip along a straight edge and compared with a previous model that incorporates friction but cannot simulate slip. Results of both models are compared to behavioral data obtained as a rat whisked against a smooth, stainless steel peg. As expected, the frictionless model predicts larger magnitudes of vertical slip than observed experimentally. The frictionless model also predicts forces and moments at the whisker base that are smaller and have a different direction than those predicted by the model with friction. Estimates for the friction coefficient yielded values near 0.48 (whisker/stainless steel). The present work provides the first assessments of the effects of friction on the mechanical signals received by the follicle during active whisking. It also demonstrates a proof-of-principle approach for reducing whisker tracking requirements during experiments and demonstrates the feasibility of simulating a full array of vibrissae whisking against a peg.
authors.forename: Lucie A
authors.initials: LA
authors.lastname: Huet
authors.forename: Mitra J Z
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Hartmann
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D017276:Friction / Q000502:physiology; D008954:Models, Biological; D051381:Rats; D020318:Rats, Long-Evans; D014110:Touch / Q000502:physiology*; D014738:Vibrissae / Q000294:innervation* / Q000502:physiology
references.citation: Acta Biomater. 2015 Jul;21:132-41
references.pmid: 25839121
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2007 Oct;98(4):2439-55
references.pmid: 17553946
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2006 Oct 11;26(41):10548-57
references.pmid: 17035540
references.citation: Somatosens Mot Res. 1990;7(1):47-65
references.pmid: 2330787
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2012 May;107(9):2298-312
references.pmid: 22298834
references.citation: PLoS Comput Biol. 2016 Jan 08;12(1):e1004109
references.pmid: 26745501
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1985 Sep;54(3):615-35
references.pmid: 4045540
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2013 Apr 17;33(16):6726-41
references.pmid: 23595731
references.citation: Somatosens Mot Res. 2002;19(4):341-6
references.pmid: 12590835
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2003 Jan;89(1):104-17
references.pmid: 12522163
references.citation: PLoS One. 2010 Jan 20;5(1):e8806
references.pmid: 20098714
references.citation: PLoS Comput Biol. 2011 Apr;7(4):e1001120
references.pmid: 21490724
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2010 Feb 3;30(5):1947-67
references.pmid: 20130203
references.citation: Neuron. 2008 Jul 10;59(1):35-42
references.pmid: 18614027
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2015 Jun 1;113(10):3511-8
references.pmid: 25867739
references.citation: Nature. 2006 Oct 5;443(7111):525
references.pmid: 17024083
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2004 Jul;92(1):665-8
references.pmid: 14999053
references.citation: PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8(7):e1002591
references.pmid: 22792058
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1978 May;41(3):798-820
references.pmid: 660231
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2015 Aug;218(Pt 16):2551-62
references.pmid: 26290591
references.citation: Biol Bull. 2003 Aug;205(1):36-46
references.pmid: 12917220
references.citation: J Biomech. 2011 Nov 10;44(16):2775-81
references.pmid: 21993474
references.citation: Elife. 2013 Nov 19;2:e01350
references.pmid: 24252879
references.citation: J Exp Biol. 2014 Sep 15;217(Pt 18):3365-76
references.pmid: 25232200