title: Gene Tree Affects Inference of Sites Under Selection by the Branch-Site Test of Positive Selection.
abstract: The branch-site test of positive selection is a standard approach to detect past episodic positive selection in a priori-specified branches of a gene phylogeny. Here, we ask if differences in the topology of the gene tree have any influence on the ability to infer positively selected sites. Using simulated sequences, we compare the results obtained for true and rearranged topologies. We find a strong relationship between "conflicting branch length," which occurs when the set of sequences that experiences selection for a given topology and foreground is changed, and the ability to predict positively selected sites. Moreover, by reanalyzing a previously published data set, we show that the choice of a gene tree also affects the results obtained for real-world sequences. This is the first study to demonstrate that tree topology has a clear effect on the inference of positive selection. We conclude that the choice of a gene tree is an important factor for the branch-site analysis of positive selection.
authors.affiliation: Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras, Portugal.; Programa de Doutoramento em Biologia Computational (PDBC), Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras, Portugal.
authors.forename: Yoan
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Diekmann
authors.affiliation: Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras, Portugal.
authors.forename: José B
authors.initials: JB
authors.lastname: Pereira-Leal
keywords: PAML; branch-site test; dN/dS; molecular evolution; positive selection
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2005 Dec;22(12):2472-9
references.pmid: 16107592
references.citation: Genetics. 2000 May;155(1):431-49
references.pmid: 10790415
references.citation: PLoS Comput Biol. 2013;9(3):e1002929
references.pmid: 23505347
references.citation: Syst Biol. 2012 May;61(3):539-42
references.pmid: 22357727
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 1994 Sep;11(5):725-36
references.pmid: 7968486
references.citation: PLoS Biol. 2012;10(12):e1001446
references.pmid: 23239941
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2013 Jul;30(7):1675-86
references.pmid: 23558341
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2013 Mar;30(3):627-41
references.pmid: 23180579
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2010 Oct;27(10):2257-67
references.pmid: 20447933
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2012 Jan;29(1):1-5
references.pmid: 21772063
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2007 Aug;24(8):1586-91
references.pmid: 17483113
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2013 Mar;30(3):642-53
references.pmid: 23144040
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2002 Jun;19(6):908-17
references.pmid: 12032247
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2005 Apr;22(4):1107-18
references.pmid: 15689528
references.citation: Genome Res. 2009 Feb;19(2):327-35
references.pmid: 19029536
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2009 Aug;26(8):1879-88
references.pmid: 19423664
references.citation: Nat Genet. 2011 May;43(5):491-8
references.pmid: 21478889
references.citation: Syst Biol. 2003 Oct;52(5):696-704
references.pmid: 14530136
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2011 Nov;28(11):3033-43
references.pmid: 21670087
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 Jul 1;34(Web Server issue):W609-12
references.pmid: 16845082
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2012 Apr;29(4):1125-39
references.pmid: 22049066
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2011 Mar;28(3):1217-28
references.pmid: 21087944
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2009 Jun 1;25(11):1422-3
references.pmid: 19304878
references.citation: BMC Bioinformatics. 2010 Jan 13;11:24
references.pmid: 20070885
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Mar 1;102(9):3179-80
references.pmid: 15728394
references.citation: Mol Biol Evol. 2002 Jun;19(6):950-8
references.pmid: 12032251