title: Contribution of Embodiment to Solving the Riddle of Infantile Amnesia.
abstract: At least since the late nineteenth century, researchers have sought an explanation for infantile amnesia (IA)-the lack of autobiographical memories dating from early childhood-and childhood amnesia (CA), faster forgetting of events up until the age of about seven. Evidence suggests that IA occurs across altricial species, and a number of studies using animal models have converged on the hypothesis that maturation of the hippocampus is an important factor. But why does the hippocampus mature at one time and not another, and how does that maturation relate to memory? Our hypothesis is rooted in theories of embodied cognition, and it provides an explanation both for hippocampal development and the end of IA. Specifically, the onset of locomotion prompts the alignment of hippocampal place cells and grid cells to the environment, which in turn facilitates the ontogeny of long-term episodic memory and the end of IA. That is, because the animal can now reliably discriminate locations, location becomes a stable cue for memories. Furthermore, as the mode of human locomotion shifts from crawling to walking, there is an additional shift in the alignment of the hippocampus that marks the beginning of adult-like episodic memory and the end of CA. Finally, given a reduction in self-locomotion and exploration with aging, the hypothesis suggests a partial explanation for cognitive decline with aging.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, TempeAZ, USA; Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, MadisonWI, USA.
authors.forename: Arthur M
authors.initials: AM
authors.lastname: Glenberg
authors.affiliation: Simpson College, Indianola IA, USA.
authors.forename: Justin
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Hayes
keywords: aging; childhood amnesia; embodiment; infantile amnesia; locomotion; memory
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2004 Apr;111(2):486-511
references.pmid: 15065919
references.citation: Cognition. 2005 May;96(1):B1-11
references.pmid: 15833301
references.citation: Nature. 2005 Aug 11;436(7052):801-6
references.pmid: 15965463
references.citation: Am J Prev Med. 2012 Feb;42(2):109-19
references.pmid: 22261206
references.citation: J Exp Child Psychol. 2012 Dec;113(4):510-22
references.pmid: 23010356
references.citation: Dev Sci. 2007 Mar;10(2):183-9
references.pmid: 17286842
references.citation: Dev Sci. 2014 Sep;17(5):743-56
references.pmid: 24628962
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1997 Jul;104(3):499-523
references.pmid: 9243962
references.citation: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2006 Apr;16(2):179-90
references.pmid: 16564688
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2015 Oct 5;25(19):2493-502
references.pmid: 26387719
references.citation: Prog Neurobiol. 1998 Jun;55(3):225-56
references.pmid: 9643555
references.citation: Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1997;62(3):I-VI, 1-158
references.pmid: 9394468
references.citation: Biol Cybern. 2014 Apr;108(2):133-43
references.pmid: 24577877
references.citation: Nature. 1996 May 23;381(6580):283
references.pmid: 8692265
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2013 Jul 1;24(7):1361-7
references.pmid: 23722981
references.citation: Infancy. 2000 Apr;1(2):149-219
references.pmid: 32680291
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 2015 Apr;122(2):204-31
references.pmid: 25844874
references.citation: Child Dev Perspect. 2014 Dec 2;8(4):187-192
references.pmid: 25774213
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Nov 3;112(44):13531-6
references.pmid: 26460030
references.citation: Cogn Sci. 2005 Jul 8;29(4):665-79
references.pmid: 21702789
references.citation: Child Dev. 2015 Nov-Dec;86(6):1710-8
references.pmid: 26459750
references.citation: Dev Sci. 2012 Jan;15(1):43-53
references.pmid: 22251291