title: Is Acropora palmata recovering? A case study in Los Roques National Park, Venezuela.
abstract: Eight years ago (2007), the distribution and status of Acropora palmata was quantified throughout Los Roques archipelago in Venezuela. The aim was to produce a baseline study for this species which combined population genetics with demographic data. The results highlighted that A. palmata had the potential to recover in at least 6 out of 10 sites surveyed. Recovery potential was assumed to be high at sites with a relatively high abundance of the coral, low disease prevalence, high genetic diversity, and high rates of sexual reproduction. However, as noted, Zubillaga et al. (2008) realized recovery was still strongly dependent on local and regional stressors. In 2014 (this study), the status of A. palmata was re-evaluated at Los Roques. We increased the number of sites from 10 in the original baseline study to 106. This allowed us to assess the population status throughout the entirety of the MPA. Furthermore, we also identified local threats that may have hindered population recovery. Here, we show that A. palmata now has a relatively restricted distribution throughout the park, only occurring in 15% of the sites surveyed. Large stands of old dead colonies were common throughout the archipelago; a result which demonstrates that this species has lost almost 50% of its original distribution over the past decades. The majority of corals recorded were large adults (∼2 m height), suggesting that these older colonies might be less susceptible or more resilient to local and global threats. However, 45% of these surviving colonies showed evidence of partial mortality and degradation of living tissues. Interestingly, the greatest increase in partial mortality occurred at sites with the lowest levels of protection ([Formula: see text]; df = 4, p < 0.05). This may suggest there is a positive role of small scale marine management in assisting reef recovery. We also recorded a significant reduction ([Formula: see text]; df = 8; p < 0.05) in the density of A. palmata in sites that had previously been categorized as having a high potential for recovery. One explanation for this continued decline may be due to the fact that over the past 10 years, two massive bleaching events have occurred throughout the Caribbean with records showing that Los Roques has experienced unprecedented declines in overall coral cover. We therefore conclude that although local protection could promote recovery, the impacts from global threats such as ocean warming may hamper the recovery of this threatened species.
authors.affiliation: Estudios Ambientales, Universidad Simón Bolívar , Caracas , Venezuela.
authors.forename: Aldo
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Croquer
authors.affiliation: Estudios Ambientales, Universidad Simón Bolívar , Caracas , Venezuela.
authors.forename: Francoise
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Cavada-Blanco
authors.affiliation: Biología de Organismos, Universidad Simón Bolivar , Caracas , Venezuela.
authors.forename: Ainhoa L
authors.initials: AL
authors.lastname: Zubillaga
authors.affiliation: Estudios Ambientales, Universidad Simón Bolívar , Caracas , Venezuela.
authors.forename: Esteban A
authors.initials: EA
authors.lastname: Agudo-Adriani
authors.affiliation: Environmental Sustainability Research Centre, College of Life and Natural Sciences, University of Derby , Derby , United Kingdom.
authors.forename: Michael
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Sweet
keywords: Acropora palmata; Los Roques; Recovery; Status; Surveys; Threats
references.citation: Science. 2003 Aug 15;301(5635):955-8
references.pmid: 12920296
references.citation: PLoS One. 2014 Apr 24;9(4):e96140
references.pmid: 24763319
references.citation: Science. 2001 Jul 27;293(5530):629-37
references.pmid: 11474098
references.citation: Science. 2003 Aug 15;301(5635):958-60
references.pmid: 12869698
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2010 Nov;25(11):633-42
references.pmid: 20800316
references.citation: Science. 2003 Aug 15;301(5635):929-33
references.pmid: 12920289
references.citation: J Exp Mar Bio Ecol. 2000 Aug 23;251(1):41-57
references.pmid: 10958900
references.citation: PLoS Biol. 2008 Feb;6(2):e54
references.pmid: 18303956
references.citation: Ecology. 2009 Oct;90(10):2859-67
references.pmid: 19886494
references.citation: Nature. 2014 Feb 13;506(7487):216-20
references.pmid: 24499817
references.citation: Environ Microbiol. 2002 Jun;4(6):318-26
references.pmid: 12071977
references.citation: Dis Aquat Organ. 2009 Nov 16;87(1-2):135-50
references.pmid: 20095248
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Jun 25;99(13):8725-30
references.pmid: 12077296
references.citation: Oecologia. 2008 Feb;155(1):169-77
references.pmid: 17972104
references.citation: Nature. 2004 Jun 24;429(6994):827-33
references.pmid: 15215854
references.citation: Mar Pollut Bull. 2005 Feb;50(2):125-46
references.pmid: 15737355
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 May 8;98(10):5411-8
references.pmid: 11344287
references.citation: PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e42884
references.pmid: 22952618
references.citation: Conserv Biol. 2007 Oct;21(5):1301-15
references.pmid: 17883495
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2006 Jul;9(7):818-26
references.pmid: 16796572