title: Current Aspects of Fragility Fracture Repair.
abstract: Due to the demographic developments worldwide, fragility fractures represent an increasing problem for the public health system. The risk of developing osteoporosis increases with age and is relatively higher in women and in the Caucasian population. The stability of bone is reduced because of accentuation of the normal loss of bone mass in ageing, leading to an increased susceptibility to fracture with an increased rate of complications after surgical stabilization. Due to this, the orthopedic surgeon has to assess the quality of the bone during preoperative planning and select the implants and postoperative care accordingly to achieve the best. Over the last 10 years fixed locking implants have been introduced into clinical practice. These represent a new type of angle stable fixation devices that address the mechanical instability between bone and implant. The novel problems associated with this device are due to higher cut-out rates when the bone structure is altered and mass is reduced. The developments in joint replacement have also resulted in longer standing times and lower complication rates with immediate fullweight-bearing after implantation. However, to date, little is known about the mechanisms of fracture healing in osteoporosis or fragility fractures. One future approach may be in supporting biological fracture healing by regenerative therapies using growth hormones and/or (stem) cells. The most frequent initial clinical symptom of osteoporosis is a fracture without a relevant trauma. At this stage, the trauma surgeon should initiate diagnostic procedures, treatment of osteoporosis and tertiary prevention according to the European guidelines. Ultimately, all female patients older than 50 years and all male patients older than 60 years with fractures should be assessed and treated for bone quality. Orthogeriatric specialists or interdisciplinary orthogeriatric teams should initiate a specific surgical treatment followed by early rehabilitation in order to allow the elderly patient to return to daily living as soon as possible.
authors.affiliation: Department of Trauma Surgery, Klinikum Innenstadt, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU), Nussbaumstr. 20, 80336, Munich, Germany. stefan.grote@med.uni-muenchen.de.
authors.forename: Stefan
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Grote
authors.forename: Wolfgang
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Boecker
authors.forename: Wolf
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Mutschler
authors.affiliation: Department of Trauma Surgery, Klinikum Innenstadt, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU), Munich, Germany. matthias.schieker@med.uni-muenchen.de.|Department of Trauma Surgery, Klinikum Innenstadt, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU), Nussbaumstr. 20, 80336, Munich, Germany. matthias.schieker@med.uni-muenchen.de.
authors.forename: Matthias
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Schieker
keywords: Fixed angle implants; Fracture fixation; Fragility fracture; Orthogeriatric; Osteoporosis
references.citation: BMJ. 2008 Jun 7;336(7656):1261-2
references.pmid: 18535035
references.citation: J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009 Jan-Feb;18(1):3-12
references.pmid: 18823799
references.citation: Osteoporos Int. 1997;7(4):390-406
references.pmid: 9373575
references.citation: Osteoporos Int. 2005 Mar;16 Suppl 2:S120-8
references.pmid: 15654580
references.citation: Injury. 2008 Sep;39 Suppl 2:S9-20
references.pmid: 18804579
references.citation: JAMA. 2004 Aug 18;292(7):837-46
references.pmid: 15315998
references.citation: New Microbiol. 2008 Apr;31(2):155-64
references.pmid: 18623979
references.citation: Osteoporos Int. 2005 Mar;16 Suppl 2:S93-S102
references.pmid: 15502962
references.citation: J Orthop Trauma. 2008 Sep;22(8 Suppl):S106-15
references.pmid: 18753886
references.citation: J Orthop Trauma. 2008 Sep;22(8 Suppl):S79-82
references.pmid: 18753894
references.citation: Osteoporos Int. 2007 Jan;18(1):77-84
references.pmid: 17048064
references.citation: Internist (Berl). 2007 Oct;48(10):1101-17
references.pmid: 17882394
references.citation: Unfallchirurg. 2006 May;109 (5):391-9; quiz 400
references.pmid: 16705427
references.citation: Osteoporos Int. 2005 Mar;16 Suppl 2:S54-64
references.pmid: 15536538
references.citation: Clin Rheum Dis. 1986 Apr;12(1):49-70
references.pmid: 3522086
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006 Oct;88(10):1272-8
references.pmid: 17012413
references.citation: Tissue Eng. 2006 Jul;12(7):1753-61
references.pmid: 16889506
references.citation: Chirurg. 2005 Feb;76(2):139-50
references.pmid: 15568128
references.citation: Am J Med. 1997 Aug 18;103(2A):12S-17S; discussion 17S-19S
references.pmid: 9302893
references.citation: Osteoporos Int. 2008 Apr;19(4):399-428
references.pmid: 18266020
references.citation: Osteoporos Int. 2005 Mar;16 Suppl 2:S3-7
references.pmid: 15365697
references.citation: Bone. 2008 Aug;43(2):343-7
references.pmid: 18544475
references.citation: Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2006 Nov;114(10):611-22
references.pmid: 17252642
references.citation: Injury. 2007 Mar;38 Suppl 1:S90-9
references.pmid: 17383490
references.citation: J Orthop Trauma. 2002 May;16(5):311-6
references.pmid: 11972073
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Feb;90 Suppl 1:43-7
references.pmid: 18292356
references.citation: J Bone Miner Res. 2007 Jun;22(6):781-8
references.pmid: 17352657
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Feb;90 Suppl 1:85-91
references.pmid: 18292362
references.citation: Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2002 Summer;18(3):597-610
references.pmid: 12391952
references.citation: Unfallchirurg. 2006 Sep;109 (9):715-32
references.pmid: 16941096
references.citation: Bone. 1992;13 Suppl 1:S7-15
references.pmid: 1581122
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 1;357(18):1799-809
references.pmid: 17878149
references.citation: J Bone Miner Res. 2003 Dec;18(12):2200-5
references.pmid: 14672355