title: What lessons can be learned from testicular histology in undescended testes?
abstract: Over the last 40-50 years studies involving thousands of testicular biopsies in boys with cryptorchidism have contributed to our knowledge of testicular histopathology and our understanding of the effects of cryptorchidism on the normal development of the germinal epithelium. Growth and maturation of germ cells and Leydig cells are crucial to allow boys to reach normal fertility potential. The following aberrations in testicular development are seen in cryptorchid testes: a decrease in total germ cell numbers, failure of fetal gonocytes (stem cells) to transform into adult dark (Ad) spermatogonia, failure for Ad spermatogonia to mature into primary spermatocytes, Leydig cell hypoplasia, and testicular fibrosis. All of these findings have been found to have a strong negative correlation with a boy's age at the time of orchidopexy. Some of these findings have prognostic significance in regards to fertility potential especially when coupled with key clinical findings such as hormonal findings, age at orchidopexy, testicle size, laterality and location of cryptorchid testes. This review focuses on key lessons learned from testicular histology in cryptorchid testes.
authors.affiliation: 1 Urology Associates of Central Missouri, Columbia, MO 65201, USA ; 2 Department of Surgery, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, USA.
authors.forename: Clay W
authors.initials: CW
authors.lastname: Mechlin
authors.affiliation: 1 Urology Associates of Central Missouri, Columbia, MO 65201, USA ; 2 Department of Surgery, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, USA.
authors.forename: Barry A
authors.initials: BA
authors.lastname: Kogan
keywords: Cryptorchidism; adult dark spermatogonia (Ad spermatogonia); fertility; fibrosis; gonocytes; histology; testicular biopsy
references.citation: Horm Res. 2001;55(1):11-7
references.pmid: 11423736
references.citation: Horm Res. 2001;55(1):6-10
references.pmid: 11423735
references.citation: J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1976 Apr;42(4):679-86
references.pmid: 1262442
references.citation: J Urol. 1986 Jul;136(1 Pt 2):274-6
references.pmid: 2873260
references.citation: BJU Int. 2007 Nov;100(5):1147-9; discussion 1149
references.pmid: 17662083
references.citation: J Urol. 1991 Aug;146(2 ( Pt 2)):624-6
references.pmid: 1677687
references.citation: Eur J Pediatr. 1987;146 Suppl 2:S2-5
references.pmid: 2891513
references.citation: J Urol. 2003 Feb;169(2):659-62
references.pmid: 12544338
references.citation: Int J Urol. 2007 Jul;14(7):616-21
references.pmid: 17645605
references.citation: J Urol. 2013 Oct;190(4 Suppl):1566-71
references.pmid: 23357211
references.citation: BJU Int. 2008 Jun;101(11):1441-5
references.pmid: 18218059
references.citation: J Clin Invest. 1974 Mar;53(3):819-28
references.pmid: 4812441
references.citation: J Urol. 2009 Aug;182(2):704-9
references.pmid: 19539332
references.citation: Eur J Pediatr. 1993;152 Suppl 2:S11-4
references.pmid: 8101802
references.citation: Horm Res. 2001;55(1):21-7
references.pmid: 11423738
references.citation: J Urol. 1989 Aug;142(2 Pt 2):546-8; discussion 572
references.pmid: 2568502
references.citation: J Urol. 2012 Oct;188(4 Suppl):1429-35
references.pmid: 22906677