title: Sublethal Toxicity Endpoints of Heavy Metals to the Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans.
abstract: Caenorhabditis elegans, a free-living nematode, is commonly used as a model organism in ecotoxicological studies. The current literatures have provided useful insight into the relative sensitivity of several endpoints, but few direct comparisons of multiple endpoints under a common set of experimental conditions. The objective of this study was to determine appropriate sublethal endpoints to develop an ecotoxicity screening and monitoring system. C. elegans was applied to explore the sublethal toxicity of four heavy metals (copper, zinc, cadmium and chromium). Two physiological endpoints (growth and reproduction), three behavioral endpoints (head thrash frequency, body bend frequency and feeding) and two enzymatic endpoints (acetylcholine esterase [AChE] and superoxide dismutase [SOD]) were selected for the assessment of heavy metal toxicity. The squared correlation coefficients (R2) between the responses observed and fitted by Logit function were higher than 0.90 and the RMSE were lower than 0.10, indicating a good significance statistically. There was no significant difference among the half effect concentration (EC50) endpoints in physiological and behavioral effects of the four heavy metals, indicating similar sensitivity of physiological and behavioral effects. AChE enzyme was more sensitive to copper, zinc, and cadmium than to other physiological and behavioral effects, and SOD enzyme was most sensitive to chromium. The EC50 of copper, zinc, and cadmium, to the AChE enzyme in the nematodes were 0.68 mg/L, 2.76 mg/L, and 0.92 mg/L respectively and the EC50 of chromium to the SOD enzyme in the nematode was 1.58 mg/L. The results of this study showed that there was a good concentration-response relationship between all four heavy metals and the sublethal toxicity effects to C. elegans. Considering these sublethal endpoints in terms of simplicity, accuracy, repeatability and costs of the experiments, feeding is the relatively ideal sublethal toxicity endpoint of heavy metals to C. elegans.
authors.affiliation: College of Resources and Environment, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450000, P.R. China.|College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, P.R. China.
authors.forename: Ying
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Jiang
authors.affiliation: School of Management Science and Engineering, Guangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanning, 530003, P.R. China.
authors.forename: Jiandong
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Chen
authors.affiliation: Soil and Fertilizer Bureau of Shandong Province, Jinan, 250100, P.R. China.
authors.forename: Yue
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Wu
authors.affiliation: College of Resources and Environment, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, 450000, P.R. China.
authors.forename: Qiang
authors.initials: Q
authors.lastname: Wang
authors.affiliation: College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, 210095, P.R. China.
authors.forename: Huixin
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Li
mesh_terms: D000110:Acetylcholinesterase / Q000378:metabolism; D000818:Animals; D002104:Cadmium / Q000633:toxicity*; D017173:Caenorhabditis elegans / Q000187:drug effects* / Q000502:physiology; D002857:Chromium / Q000633:toxicity*; D003300:Copper / Q000633:toxicity*; D004305:Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; D005247:Feeding Behavior / Q000187:drug effects*; D015801:Helminth Proteins / Q000037:antagonists & inhibitors / Q000378:metabolism; D007928:Lethal Dose 50; D009068:Movement; D012098:Reproduction / Q000187:drug effects; D013482:Superoxide Dismutase / Q000037:antagonists & inhibitors / Q000378:metabolism; D015032:Zinc / Q000633:toxicity*
chemical_list: D015801:Helminth Proteins; D002104:Cadmium; D002857:Chromium; D003300:Copper; D013482:Superoxide Dismutase; D000110:Acetylcholinesterase; D015032:Zinc
references.citation: Ecotoxicology. 2009 Apr;18(3):325-33
references.pmid: 19067159
references.citation: FASEB J. 2001 Mar;15(3):627-34
references.pmid: 11259381
references.citation: Free Radic Biol Med. 2011 Oct 15;51(8):1575-82
references.pmid: 21839827
references.citation: Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2013 Aug;94:73-9
references.pmid: 23721856
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Mar;76(3):1333-7
references.pmid: 286315
references.citation: Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2011 Sep;32(2):175-84
references.pmid: 21843797
references.citation: Toxicology. 2007 Jul 31;237(1-3):126-33
references.pmid: 17604895
references.citation: Environ Toxicol Chem. 2003 May;22(5):1100-6
references.pmid: 12729220
references.citation: Genetics. 1974 May;77(1):71-94
references.pmid: 4366476
references.citation: Toxicol Ind Health. 1990 May-Jul;6(3-4):425-40
references.pmid: 2237928
references.citation: Bull Environ Contam Toxicol. 2003 Sep;71(3):489-96
references.pmid: 14567574
references.citation: J Environ Sci Health B. 1990 Feb;25(1):1-29
references.pmid: 2187918
references.citation: Toxicol Sci. 2008 Apr;102(2):345-51
references.pmid: 17728284
references.citation: Toxicol Sci. 2008 Nov;106(1):5-28
references.pmid: 18566021
references.citation: Aging (Albany NY). 2011 Aug;3(8):733-53
references.pmid: 21937765
references.citation: Environ Toxicol Chem. 2003 Nov;22(11):2768-74
references.pmid: 14587920
references.citation: Aquat Toxicol. 2006 Jan 5;76(1):46-58
references.pmid: 16249038
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Nov 10;95(23):13935-40
references.pmid: 9811904
references.citation: Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007 May 25;357(1):200-5
references.pmid: 17418813
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Oct 1;90(19):8905-9
references.pmid: 8415630
references.citation: J Mol Biol. 2004 Aug 20;341(4):951-59
references.pmid: 15328611
references.citation: Environ Toxicol Chem. 2001 Apr;20(4):833-8
references.pmid: 11345460
references.citation: Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2007 Mar;66(3):378-83
references.pmid: 16618507
references.citation: J Exp Zool. 1999 Jul 1;284(2):147-57
references.pmid: 10404644
references.citation: J Nematol. 1993 Dec;25(4):573-7
references.pmid: 19279811
references.citation: Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2007 Nov;24(3):223-30
references.pmid: 21783815
references.citation: Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2008 Apr;54(3):447-53
references.pmid: 17932710
references.citation: J Neurobiol. 2003 Aug;56(2):178-97
references.pmid: 12838583
references.citation: Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2009 Nov;28(3):459-64
references.pmid: 21784043
references.citation: J Toxicol Environ Health A. 1999 Dec 10;58(7):451-62
references.pmid: 10616193
references.citation: Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005 Aug 30;1725(1):81-92
references.pmid: 16023296
references.citation: Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2010 Jul;73(5):1057-62
references.pmid: 20417559
references.citation: Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2008 Oct;71(2):483-9
references.pmid: 18187192
references.citation: Toxicol Sci. 2004 Oct;81(2):518-27
references.pmid: 15254339
references.citation: J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 2009 Jan-Feb;23(1):9-17
references.pmid: 19202558