title: Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a debilitating condition associated with degeneration of the spine with aging.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To evaluate the effectiveness of different types of surgery compared with different types of non-surgical interventions in adults with symptomatic LSS. Primary outcomes included quality of life, disability, function and pain. Also, to consider complication rates and side effects, and to evaluate short-, intermediate- and long-term outcomes (six months, six months to two years, five years or longer).
  
  
  METHODS
  We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, five other databases and two trials registries up to February 2015. We also screened reference lists and conference proceedings related to treatment of the spine.
  
  
  METHODS
  Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing surgical versus non-operative treatments in participants with lumbar spinal stenosis confirmed by clinical and imaging findings.
  
  
  METHODS
  For data collection and analysis, we followed methods guidelines of the Cochrane Back and Neck Review Group (Furlan 2009) and those provided in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Higgins 2011).
  
  
  RESULTS
  From the 12,966 citations screened, we assessed 26 full-text articles and included five RCTs (643 participants).Low-quality evidence from the meta-analysis performed on two trials using the Oswestry Disability Index (pain-related disability) to compare direct decompression with or without fusion versus multi-modal non-operative care showed no significant differences at six months (mean difference (MD) -3.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) -10.12 to 2.80) and at one year (MD -6.18, 95% CI -15.03 to 2.66). At 24 months, significant differences favoured decompression (MD -4.43, 95% CI -7.91 to -0.96). Low-quality evidence from one small study revealed no difference in pain outcomes between decompression and usual conservative care (bracing and exercise) at three months (risk ratio (RR) 1.38, 95% CI 0.22 to 8.59), four years (RR 7.50, 95% CI 1.00 to 56.48) and 10 years (RR 4.09, 95% CI 0.95 to 17.58).Low-quality evidence from one small study suggested no differences at six weeks in the Oswestry Disability Index for patients treated with minimally invasive mild decompression versus those treated with epidural steroid injections (MD 5.70, 95% CI 0.57 to 10.83; 38 participants). Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) results were better for epidural injection at six weeks (MD -0.60, 95% CI -0.92 to -0.28), and visual analogue scale (VAS) improvements were better in the mild decompression group (MD 2.40, 95% CI 1.92 to 2.88). At 12 weeks, many cross-overs prevented further analysis.Low-quality evidence from a single study including 191 participants favoured the interspinous spacer versus usual conservative treatment at six weeks, six months and one year for symptom severity and physical function.All remaining studies reported complications associated with surgery and conservative side effects of treatment: Two studies reported no major complications in the surgical group, and the other study reported complications in 10% and 24% of participants, including spinous process fracture, coronary ischaemia, respiratory distress, haematoma, stroke, risk of reoperation and death due to pulmonary oedema.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  We have very little confidence to conclude whether surgical treatment or a conservative approach is better for lumbar spinal stenosis, and we can provide no new recommendations to guide clinical practice. However, it should be noted that the rate of side effects ranged from 10% to 24% in surgical cases, and no side effects were reported for any conservative treatment. No clear benefits were observed with surgery versus non-surgical treatment. These findings suggest that clinicians should be very careful in informing patients about possible treatment options, especially given that conservative treatment options have resulted in no reported side effects. High-quality research is needed to compare surgical versus conservative care for individuals with lumbar spinal stenosis.
authors.affiliation: ISICO (Italian Scientific Spine Institute), Via Roberto Bellarmino 13/1, Milan, Italy, 20141.
authors.forename: Fabio
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Zaina
authors.forename: Christy
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Tomkins-Lane
authors.forename: Eugene
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Carragee
authors.forename: Stefano
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Negrini
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D001915:Braces; D019299:Decompression, Surgical / Q000009:adverse effects; D005081:Exercise Therapy; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007268:Injections, Epidural; D007796:Laminectomy; D008161:Lumbosacral Region; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010147:Pain Measurement; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; D013117:Spinal Cord Compression / Q000601:surgery; D013123:Spinal Fusion / Q000009:adverse effects; D013130:Spinal Stenosis / Q000601:surgery / Q000628:therapy*
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 May 1;37(10):E609-16
references.pmid: 22158059
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Mar 1;25(5):556-62
references.pmid: 10749631
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Jun 1;25(11):1424-35; discussion 1435-6
references.pmid: 10828926
references.citation: Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2003 Feb;14(1):77-101, vi-vii
references.pmid: 12622484
references.citation: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Aug 30;(8):CD010712
references.pmid: 23996271
references.citation: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Apr;93(4):647-53
references.pmid: 22365377
references.citation: Spine J. 2008 Mar-Apr;8(2):305-10
references.pmid: 18082461
references.citation: Joint Bone Spine. 2002 Oct;69(5):450-7
references.pmid: 12477228
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Dec 1;36(25):2197-210
references.pmid: 21912308
references.citation: Eur Spine J. 2004 Feb;13(1):22-31
references.pmid: 14685830
references.citation: J Clin Epidemiol. 1995 Nov;48(11):1369-78
references.pmid: 7490600
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Apr 15;30(8):936-43
references.pmid: 15834339
references.citation: JAMA. 2010 Apr 7;303(13):1309-10
references.pmid: 20371793
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Jun 15;25(12):1509-14
references.pmid: 10851099
references.citation: Ann Intern Med. 2015 Apr 7;162(7):465-73
references.pmid: 25844995
references.citation: Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2010 Aug;53(4):179-83
references.pmid: 21132610
references.citation: Pain Physician. 2007 Jul;10(4):547-58
references.pmid: 17660853
references.citation: J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2010;23(1):31-7
references.pmid: 20231787
references.citation: West J Med. 1993 Feb;158(2):171-7
references.pmid: 8434469
references.citation: BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011 Mar 03;12:57
references.pmid: 21371314
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2007 May 31;356(22):2257-70
references.pmid: 17538085
references.citation: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Jul;87(7):897-903
references.pmid: 16813774
references.citation: J Am Geriatr Soc. 1996 Mar;44(3):285-90
references.pmid: 8600197
references.citation: J Spinal Disord. 1998 Apr;11(2):110-5
references.pmid: 9588466
references.citation: Pain Pract. 2012 Jun;12(5):333-41
references.pmid: 22272730
references.citation: Eur Spine J. 2011 Jul;20(7):1174-81
references.pmid: 21240530
references.citation: Eur Spine J. 2014 Oct;23(10):2028-45
references.pmid: 25212440
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 May;458:90-3
references.pmid: 17308483
references.citation: Spine J. 2015 Apr 1;15(4):577-86
references.pmid: 25452012
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Aug 15;34(18):1929-41
references.pmid: 19680101
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2008 Feb 21;358(8):794-810
references.pmid: 18287602
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Aug 1;21(15):1787-94; discussion 1794-5
references.pmid: 8855463
references.citation: Yonsei Med J. 2014 May;55(3):779-84
references.pmid: 24719148
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1987 Jun;12(5):483-7
references.pmid: 2820066
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Nov 15;36(24):2061-8
references.pmid: 22048651
references.citation: J Spinal Disord Tech. 2002 Feb;15(1):39-46
references.pmid: 11891449
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Feb;443:198-207
references.pmid: 16462443
references.citation: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 May;53(5):785-92
references.pmid: 15877553
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jun 15;30(12):1351-8
references.pmid: 15959362
references.citation: JAMA. 2010 Jan 6;303(1):71-2
references.pmid: 20051574
references.citation: Eura Medicophys. 2006 Jun;42(2):151-70
references.pmid: 16767064
references.citation: J Clin Epidemiol. 2005 Dec;58(12):1233-40
references.pmid: 16291467
references.citation: Neurol Clin. 2007 May;25(2):407-18
references.pmid: 17445736
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Jun 15;35(14):1329-38
references.pmid: 20453723
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 Jun 1;19(11):1207-12; discussion 13
references.pmid: 8073311
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999 May 15;24(10):1043-7
references.pmid: 10332799
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Feb 1;36(3):219-29
references.pmid: 21124260
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Sep 15;36(20):E1335-51
references.pmid: 21311394
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Sep 1;21(17):2046-52
references.pmid: 8883210
references.citation: JAMA. 2010 Apr 7;303(13):1259-65
references.pmid: 20371784
references.citation: J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2012;25(3):177-85
references.pmid: 22935856
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Feb;443:139-46
references.pmid: 16462438
references.citation: Semin Neurol. 2002 Jun;22(2):157-66
references.pmid: 12524561
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Jun 15;28(12):1290-9
references.pmid: 12811274
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Nov 2;93(21):1979-86
references.pmid: 22048092
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Aug 1;21(15):1769-76
references.pmid: 8855461
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Aug;89(8):1872
references.pmid: 17671033
references.citation: Phys Ther. 2001 Jul;81(7):1296-306
references.pmid: 11444993
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Mar 15;28(6):616-20
references.pmid: 12642771
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Oct 15;34(22):2444-9
references.pmid: 19829259
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Jun 15;27(12):1361-72
references.pmid: 12065987
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Jan 1;32(1):1-8
references.pmid: 17202885