title: Positive Pacing Strategies Are Utilized by Elite Male and Female Para-cyclists in Short Time Trials in the Velodrome.
abstract: In para-cycling, competitors are classed based on functional impairment resulting in cyclists with neurological and locomotor impairments competing against each other. In Paralympic competition, classes are combined by using a factoring adjustment to race times to produce the overall medallists. Pacing in short-duration track cycling events is proposed to utilize an "all-out" strategy in able-bodied competition. However, pacing in para-cycling may vary depending on the level of impairment. Analysis of the pacing strategies employed by different classification groups may offer scope for optimal performance; therefore, this study investigated the pacing strategy adopted during the 1-km time trial (TT) and 500-m TT in elite C1 to C3 para-cyclists and able-bodied cyclists. Total times and intermediate split times (125-m intervals; measured to 0.001 s) were obtained from the C1-C3 men's 1-km TT (n = 28) and women's 500-m TT (n = 9) from the 2012 Paralympic Games and the men's 1-km TT (n = 19) and women's 500-m TT (n = 12) from the 2013 UCI World Track Championships from publically available video. Split times were expressed as actual time, factored time (for the para-cyclists) and as a percentage of total time. A two-way analysis of variance was used to investigate differences in split times between the different classifications and the able-bodied cyclists in the men's 1-km TT and between the para-cyclists and able-bodied cyclists in the women's 500-m TT. The importance of position at the first split was investigated with Kendall's Tau-b correlation. The first 125-m split time was the slowest for all cyclists, representing the acceleration phase from a standing start. C2 cyclists were slowest at this 125-m split, probably due to a combination of remaining seated in this acceleration phase and a high proportion of cyclists in this group being trans-femoral amputees. Not all cyclists used aero-bars, preferring to use drop, flat or bullhorn handlebars. Split times increased in the later stages of the race, demonstrating a positive pacing strategy. In the shorter women's 500-m TT, rank at the first split was more strongly correlated with final position than in the longer men's 1-km TT. In conclusion, a positive pacing strategy was adopted by the different para-cycling classes.
authors.affiliation: School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham Birmingham, UK.
authors.forename: Rachel L
authors.initials: RL
authors.lastname: Wright
keywords: Paralympic; cycling; pacing; para-cycling; performance; time trial; velodrome
references.citation: Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2009 Jun;4(2):195-205
references.pmid: 19567923
references.citation: Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2007 Mar;2(1):22-33
references.pmid: 19255452
references.citation: Can J Sport Sci. 1988 Dec;13(4):208-13
references.pmid: 3219668
references.citation: Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Jan;94(1):28-37
references.pmid: 24919082
references.citation: Eur J Appl Physiol. 2002 Nov;88(1-2):152-7
references.pmid: 12436284
references.citation: Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011 Mar;43(3):457-67
references.pmid: 20689463
references.citation: Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007 Apr;39(4):709-15
references.pmid: 17414810
references.citation: J Sports Sci. 2003 Sep;21(9):767-87
references.pmid: 14579871
references.citation: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997 Apr;78(4):385-92
references.pmid: 9111458
references.citation: Sports Med. 2008;38(3):239-52
references.pmid: 18278984
references.citation: Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2014 Mar;9(2):362-4
references.pmid: 23921156
references.citation: J Appl Physiol (1985). 2011 May;110(5):1248-55
references.pmid: 21330612
references.citation: Br J Sports Med. 2011 Feb;45(2):114-9
references.pmid: 19679576
references.citation: J Sports Sci. 2015;33(16):1730-7
references.pmid: 25658151
references.citation: Front Physiol. 2012 Aug 15;3:327
references.pmid: 22934075
references.citation: J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2005 Sep;45(3):277-83
references.pmid: 16230977
references.citation: Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000 Oct;32(10):1737-42
references.pmid: 11039646
references.citation: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2008 Feb;23(2):248-51
references.pmid: 17950505
references.citation: Sports Med. 2007;37(8):647-67
references.pmid: 17645369
references.citation: Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2016 May;26(5):528-34
references.pmid: 25996563
references.citation: Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2016 Jan;11(1):122-9
references.pmid: 26062042
references.citation: J Rehabil Med. 2012 Nov;44(11):932-8
references.pmid: 23060306
references.citation: Neurosci Lett. 2014 Jul 25;576:11-6
references.pmid: 24861507
references.citation: Int J Sports Med. 2004 Apr;25(3):198-204
references.pmid: 15088244
references.citation: Funct Neurol. 2004 Oct-Dec;19(4):233-8
references.pmid: 15776791
references.citation: Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2015 Nov;10(8):1015-22
references.pmid: 25756313
references.citation: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2006 Nov;291(5):R1457-64
references.pmid: 16840656
references.citation: J Sci Med Sport. 1999 Oct;2(3):266-77
references.pmid: 10668763
references.citation: Int J Sports Med. 1992 Aug;13(6):447-51
references.pmid: 1428374