title: The role of noninvasive testing and questionnaires in urethroplasty follow-up.
abstract: Urethroplasty is the preferred surgical approach for the management of urethral stricture disease. To date, no standard has been established to evaluate stricture recurrence after urethral reconstruction, though both invasive and non-invasive methods are used widely. In this article we review the role of noninvasive testing and questionnaires in urethral monitoring after urethroplasty.
authors.affiliation: Department of Urology, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
authors.forename: Gareth J
authors.initials: GJ
authors.lastname: Warren
authors.affiliation: Department of Urology, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
authors.forename: Bradley A
authors.initials: BA
authors.lastname: Erickson
keywords: Urethral stricture disease; outcomes; questionnaire; urethroplasty; uroflowmetry (UF)
references.citation: J Urol. 2008 Jun;179(6):2291-4; discussion 2294-5
references.pmid: 18423709
references.citation: Urology. 1995 Nov;46(5):697-706
references.pmid: 7495124
references.citation: Radiology. 2009 Jul;252(1):240-6
references.pmid: 19561259
references.citation: J Urol. 2006 Jul;176(1):22-8
references.pmid: 16753359
references.citation: Urology. 1996 May;47(5):658-63
references.pmid: 8650862
references.citation: J Urol. 2010 Oct;184(4):1386-90
references.pmid: 20727546
references.citation: J Urol. 2006 Jul;176(1):29-35
references.pmid: 16753360
references.citation: J Urol. 2006 Jan;175(1):213-6
references.pmid: 16406914
references.citation: Urology. 1997 Jan;49(1):46-9
references.pmid: 9000184
references.citation: Curr Opin Urol. 2010 Nov;20(6):495-9
references.pmid: 20625297
references.citation: J Urol. 2013 Oct;190(4):1292-7
references.pmid: 23583856
references.citation: J Urol. 1992 Nov;148(5):1549-57; discussion 1564
references.pmid: 1279218
references.citation: J Urol. 1998 Apr;159(4):1192-4
references.pmid: 9507830
references.citation: J Urol. 2011 Nov;186(5):1934-7
references.pmid: 21944128
references.citation: J Urol. 2013 Jan;189(1):182-8
references.pmid: 23174257
references.citation: Eur Urol. 2011 Jul;60(1):60-8
references.pmid: 21419566
references.citation: S Afr Med J. 2012 Mar 07;102(4):237-40
references.pmid: 22464506
references.citation: J Urol. 1998 Mar;159(3):873-4
references.pmid: 9474172
references.citation: Urology. 2013 Aug;82(2):471-5
references.pmid: 23896103
references.citation: J Urol. 2009 Oct;182(4):1266-70
references.pmid: 19683309
references.citation: Br J Urol. 1975 Oct;47(5):559-66
references.pmid: 1191927
references.citation: BJU Int. 2007 Mar;99(3):607-11
references.pmid: 17155967
references.citation: BMJ. 2010 Jan 18;340:c186
references.pmid: 20083546
references.citation: Urology. 2011 Jul;78(1):17-20
references.pmid: 21550646
references.citation: J Urol. 1988 Aug;140(2):316-7
references.pmid: 3398127
references.citation: Urology. 2014 Jul;84(1):213-6
references.pmid: 24837453
references.citation: Urology. 2014 Jan;83(1):220-4
references.pmid: 24231222
references.citation: Eur Urol. 2013 Nov;64(5):777-82
references.pmid: 23664422
references.citation: Br J Urol. 1994 Feb;73(2):155-9
references.pmid: 8131017
references.citation: J Urol. 2001 Dec;166(6):2273-6
references.pmid: 11696750
references.citation: J Urol. 1985 Mar;133(3):421-4
references.pmid: 2579251
references.citation: Urology. 2011 Sep;78(3):696-700
references.pmid: 21741691
references.citation: J Urol. 1992 Apr;147(4):1044-7
references.pmid: 1372659
references.citation: Urology. 2006 Feb;67(2):269-74
references.pmid: 16461076
references.citation: J Urol. 2002 Nov;168(5):2051-4
references.pmid: 12394706
references.citation: World J Urol. 2006 Aug;24(3):250-4
references.pmid: 16508787
references.citation: Handb Clin Neurol. 2013;110:209-20
references.pmid: 23312642
references.citation: J Urol. 2005 Oct;174(4 Pt 1):1317-21; discussion 1321-2; author reply 1322
references.pmid: 16145411