title: IRB reliance: An informatics approach.
abstract: Multi-site Institutional Review Board (IRB) review of clinical research projects is an important but complex and time-consuming activity that is hampered by disparate non-interoperable computer systems for management of IRB applications. This paper describes our work toward harmonizing the workflow and data model of IRB applications through the development of a software-as-a-service shared-IRB platform for five institutions in South Carolina. Several commonalities and differences were recognized across institutions and a core data model that included the data elements necessary for IRB applications across all institutions was identified. We extended and modified the system to support collaborative reviews of IRB proposals within routine workflows of participating IRBs. Overall about 80% of IRB application content was harmonized across all institutions, establishing the foundation for a streamlined cooperative review and reliance. Since going live in 2011, 49 applications that underwent cooperative reviews over a three year period were approved, with the majority involving 2 out of 5 institutions. We believe this effort will inform future work on a common IRB data model that will allow interoperability through a federated approach for sharing IRB reviews and decisions with the goal of promoting reliance across institutions in the translational research community at large.
authors.affiliation: Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA. Electronic address: jobeid@musc.edu.
authors.forename: Jihad S
authors.initials: JS
authors.lastname: Obeid
authors.affiliation: Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
authors.forename: Randall W
authors.initials: RW
authors.lastname: Alexander
authors.affiliation: Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
authors.forename: Stephanie M
authors.initials: SM
authors.lastname: Gentilin
authors.affiliation: Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
authors.forename: Brigette
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: White
authors.affiliation: University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
authors.forename: Christine B
authors.initials: CB
authors.lastname: Turley
authors.affiliation: Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
authors.forename: Kathleen T
authors.initials: KT
authors.lastname: Brady
authors.affiliation: Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
authors.forename: Leslie A
authors.initials: LA
authors.lastname: Lenert
mesh_terms: D003299:Cooperative Behavior; D028744:Ethics Committees, Research / Q000592:standards*; D033181:Information Dissemination / Q000379:methods; D008491:Medical Informatics Applications; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D015337:Multicenter Studies as Topic; D012984:Software; D013022:South Carolina; D057188:Workflow
keywords: Clinical research; Data model; IRB; Informatics; Reliance; Workflow
references.citation: J Nurs Scholarsh. 2004;36(3):260-4
references.pmid: 15495496
references.citation: Acad Med. 2012 Dec;87(12):1710-4
references.pmid: 23095928
references.citation: JAMA. 2003 Jul 16;290(3):360-6
references.pmid: 12865377
references.citation: Milbank Q. 2011 Dec;89(4):599-627
references.pmid: 22188349
references.citation: IRB. 2005 May-Jun;27(3):1-7
references.pmid: 16021793
references.citation: J Biomed Inform. 2015 Oct;57:88-99
references.pmid: 26188274
references.citation: Acad Emerg Med. 2001 Jun;8(6):636-41
references.pmid: 11388939
references.citation: J Biomed Inform. 2014 Dec;52:121-9
references.pmid: 24929181
references.citation: Nat Med. 2004 Dec;10(12):1283-8
references.pmid: 15580245
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2002 May 2;346(18):1405-8
references.pmid: 11986418