title: My indications for treatment of the adolescent varicocele (and why?).
abstract: What to do with the adolescent varicocele? With merging the information obtained from an extensive review of the literature with our own clinical research, I believe that we already have knowledge enough to say that the adolescent with a varicocele often is in the midst of a progressive disease process. Strong evidence already exists that well more than the majority of Tanner 5 boys with a varicocele and 20% asymmetry will already have abnormally low total motile sperm counts (TMCs) and likely abnormally low sperm concentration as well. There are now many studies in addition to common sense to support the value of % asymmetry as a marker of future abnormal sperm parameters. While we know that some boys at lower Tanner stages who present with asymmetry will have catch-up growth during adolescence, we also know that almost all boys with 15% asymmetry or greater in conjunction with a Doppler detected peak retrograde flow (PRF) of 38 cm/s or greater will end up with greater than 20% asymmetry on follow-up. There also are some boys of concern with less asymmetry but instead have small testes bilaterally, perhaps as a result of the left varicocele slowing the growth of the right testicle and/or an associated undetected or overlooked palpable right varicocele that is also negatively affecting the right testicle. Fortunately, we now have another marker available, i.e., total testicular volume (TTV), to assist in decision making for the adolescent falling into this scenario. Once markers are in place in an early Tanner stage boy with a varicocele that indicate that abnormal semen parameters will likely be present when a Tanner 5 stage of development is reached, there is no reason to wait until the child is older so that a semen analysis can be comfortably requested for the documentation. One argument in favor of waiting is that abnormal semen parameters in a Tanner 5 male usually are reversible. However, how do we know that once abnormal parameters are reversed they then will stay normal in a testicle that already has incurred damage. In other words, I feel it is best to operate once the indicators are in place. We do not want to be suddenly surprised when that individual when older has difficulty fathering a child at a time in life when surgery might be too late to resolve what has taken years to develop. Within this manuscript I will try to document my reasons for the aforementioned rationale.
authors.affiliation: Department of Urology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA.
authors.forename: Kenneth I
authors.initials: KI
authors.lastname: Glassberg
keywords: Pediatrics; adolescent varicocele; infertility; paternity; testicular ultrasound
references.citation: Andrology. 2013 Nov;1(6):936-42
references.pmid: 24124170
references.citation: J Urol. 1980 Dec;124(6):833-9
references.pmid: 7441834
references.citation: Urology. 2006 Dec;68(6):1323-6
references.pmid: 17169654
references.citation: Pediatrics. 2004 Dec;114(6):1631-3
references.pmid: 15574626
references.citation: Fertil Steril. 1992 Jan;57(1):174-7
references.pmid: 1730313
references.citation: J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009 Apr;19 Suppl 1:S133-6
references.pmid: 19196091
references.citation: J Urol. 2009 Nov;182(5):2460-3
references.pmid: 19765758
references.citation: J Urol. 2007 Oct;178(4 Pt 2):1584-8
references.pmid: 17707046
references.citation: J Androl. 2007 Sep-Oct;28(5):727-33
references.pmid: 17494098
references.citation: J Urol. 1999 Jan;161(1):117-21
references.pmid: 10037382
references.citation: J Urol. 1995 Mar;153(3 Pt 1):704-5
references.pmid: 7861514
references.citation: J Urol. 2010 Feb;183(2):731-4
references.pmid: 20022048
references.citation: Nat Rev Urol. 2012 Mar 27;9(5):247-57
references.pmid: 22450604
references.citation: J Urol. 1992 Dec;148(6):1808-11
references.pmid: 1433614
references.citation: Fertil Steril. 1993 Mar;59(3):613-6
references.pmid: 8458466
references.citation: J Pediatr Urol. 2013 Dec;9(6 Pt B):1018-22
references.pmid: 23523423
references.citation: J Urol. 2009 Jun;181(6):2717-22; discussion 2723
references.pmid: 19375756
references.citation: J Urol. 1987 Mar;137(3):475-6
references.pmid: 3820376
references.citation: Asian J Androl. 2005 Mar;7(1):77-80
references.pmid: 15685356
references.citation: Pediatr Surg Int. 2008 Jun;24(6):727-30
references.pmid: 18421464
references.citation: J Urol. 2002 Aug;168(2):731-4
references.pmid: 12131361
references.citation: J Urol. 1992 Aug;148(2 Pt 2):694-6
references.pmid: 1640548
references.citation: J Urol. 2013 May;189(5):1897-901
references.pmid: 23154205
references.citation: J Pediatr Surg. 2000 Aug;35(8):1222-5
references.pmid: 10945699
references.citation: J Urol. 2008 Sep;180(3):1111-4; discussion 1114-5
references.pmid: 18639288
references.citation: Urology. 2012 Jan;79(1):128-32
references.pmid: 22055689
references.citation: Urology. 2011 May;77(5):1194-8
references.pmid: 21256543
references.citation: BJU Int. 2006 Jun;97(6):1291-7
references.pmid: 16686728
references.citation: J Urol. 2008 Jul;180(1):326-30; discussion 330-1
references.pmid: 18501381
references.citation: J Urol. 1997 Sep;158(3 Pt 2):1128-32
references.pmid: 9258155
references.citation: BJU Int. 2001 Apr;87(6):494-8
references.pmid: 11298041
references.citation: J Pediatr Surg. 2012 Feb;47(2):383-5
references.pmid: 22325396
references.citation: J Urol. 2005 May;173(5):1751-4
references.pmid: 15821575
references.citation: Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2013 Apr;17(8):1060-3
references.pmid: 23661519
references.citation: J Urol. 2013 May;189(5):1626-7
references.pmid: 23485504
references.citation: J Pediatr Surg. 2001 Oct;36(10 ):1546-50
references.pmid: 11584406
references.citation: Urology. 2007 Jan;69(1):152-7
references.pmid: 17270639
references.citation: Urology. 1993 Nov;42(5):541-3
references.pmid: 8236597
references.citation: BJU Int. 2001 Apr;87(6):499-501
references.pmid: 11298042
references.citation: J Urol. 1977 Feb;117(2):175-6
references.pmid: 833961
references.citation: J Pediatr Urol. 2009 Feb;5(1):37-41
references.pmid: 18805058
references.citation: Fertil Steril. 2008 Nov;90(5):1769-73
references.pmid: 18166185
references.citation: J Urol. 2008 Oct;180(4 Suppl):1653-6; discussion 1656
references.pmid: 18715592
references.citation: Fertil Steril. 1991 Oct;56(4):731-6
references.pmid: 1915950
references.citation: J Urol. 2008 Oct;180(4 Suppl):1657-9; discussion 1659-60
references.pmid: 18708215
references.citation: J Urol. 2014 May;191(5):1401-6
references.pmid: 24231835