title: The Burden of Ventricular Arrhythmias Following Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.
abstract: Few innovations in medicine have so convincingly and expeditiously improved patient outcomes more than the development of the left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Where optimal pharmacotherapy once routinely failed those with end-stage disease, the LVAD now offers considerable hope for the growing advanced heart failure population. Despite improvements in mortality, however, mechanical circulatory support is not without its limitations. Those supported with an LVAD are at increased risk of several complications, including infection, bleeding, stroke and arrhythmic events. While once considered benign, ventricular arrhythmias in the LVAD patient are being increasingly recognised for their deleterious influence on patient morbidity and quality of life. In addition, the often multifactorial aetiology to these episodes makes treatment difficult and optimal therapeutic management controversial. Novel strategies are clearly needed to better predict, prevent, and eradicate these arrhythmias in order to allow future generations of heart failure patients to reap the full benefits of LVAD implantation.
authors.affiliation: Department of Internal Medicine, University of North Carolina.
authors.forename: Jan M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Griffin
authors.affiliation: Division of Cardiology, Center for Heart and Vascular Care, University of North Carolina, US.
authors.forename: Jason N
authors.initials: JN
authors.lastname: Katz
keywords: Ventricular assist device; treatment; ventricular arrhythmias
references.citation: Circulation. 1994 Nov;90(5):2534-9
references.pmid: 7955213
references.citation: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2012 Nov;35(11):1377-83
references.pmid: 22946711
references.citation: J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013 Feb;32(2):141-56
references.pmid: 23352390
references.citation: Heart Rhythm. 2010 Apr;7(4):466-71
references.pmid: 20178869
references.citation: J Card Fail. 2012 Feb;18(2):140-5
references.pmid: 22300782
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2005 Jan 20;352(3):225-37
references.pmid: 15659722
references.citation: ASAIO J. 2012 Mar-Apr;58(2):170-3
references.pmid: 22370689
references.citation: J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014 Jun;33(6):555-64
references.pmid: 24856259
references.citation: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013 Aug;6(4):668-74
references.pmid: 23873139
references.citation: J Card Fail. 2005 Apr;11(3):227-32
references.pmid: 15812752
references.citation: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 May 3;45(9):1428-34
references.pmid: 15862414
references.citation: J Heart Lung Transplant. 2007 Aug;26(8):819-25
references.pmid: 17692786
references.citation: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2012 May;35(5):e144-8
references.pmid: 21679198
references.citation: ASAIO J. 2007 Mar-Apr;53(2):152-8
references.pmid: 17413553
references.citation: J Heart Lung Transplant. 2009 Jul;28(7):733-5
references.pmid: 19560703
references.citation: J Heart Lung Transplant. 2009 Sep;28(9):863-9
references.pmid: 19716036
references.citation: ASAIO J. 2014 May-Jun;60(3):311-6
references.pmid: 24614361
references.citation: Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Oct;88(4):1162-70
references.pmid: 19766801
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2001 Nov 15;345(20):1435-43
references.pmid: 11794191
references.citation: Heart Rhythm. 2012 Jun;9(6):859-64
references.pmid: 22293139
references.citation: Am J Cardiol. 2007 Apr 15;99(8):1151-3
references.pmid: 17437746
references.citation: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Jun 25;61(25):2542-50
references.pmid: 23643502
references.citation: Prehosp Emerg Care. 2011 Oct-Dec;15(4):533-6
references.pmid: 21806468
references.citation: Eur J Heart Fail. 2010 Jun;12(6):593-9
references.pmid: 20406799
references.citation: Am Heart J. 2012 Sep;164(3):373-8
references.pmid: 22980304
references.citation: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2008 Oct;31(10):1246-52
references.pmid: 18811803