title: Intraoperative Predictors of Long-term Outcomes After Radiofrequency Endometrial Ablation.
abstract: To identify intraoperative predictors of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) failure after adjusting for clinical risk factors.
  
  
  
  A cohort study (Canadian Task Force II-2).
  
  
  
  An academic institution in the Upper Midwest.
  
  
  
  Data were retrospectively collected from medical records of women who underwent RFA and who had a postprocedure gynecologic assessment between April 1998 and December 2011.
  
  
  
  RFA.
  
  
  
  The primary outcome was RFA failure, which was defined as hysterectomy, repeat ablation, synechiolysis, or treatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue for postablation pain or bleeding. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to test the predictability of intraoperative variables on RFA failure with adjustment for baseline predictors. We created an RFA index to capture the procedure duration divided by the uterine surface area. One thousand one hundred seventy-eight women were eligible. The median age at ablation was 44 years (interquartile range, 40-48 years), and the median parity was 2 (interquartile range, 2-3). Dysmenorrhea and prior tubal ligation were reported in 37.1% and 37.2% of women, respectively. After adjustment for baseline characteristics, intraoperative predictors of failure were uterine sounding length >10.5 cm (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 2.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.31-5.05), uterine cavity length >6 cm (adjusted HR = 2.06; 95% CI, 1.30-3.27), uterine width >4.5 cm (adjusted HR = 2.06; 95% CI, 1.29-3.28), surface area >25 cm(2) (adjusted HR = 2.02; 95% CI, 1.26-3.23), procedure time <93 seconds (adjusted HR = 2.61; 95% CI, 1.25-5.47), and RFA index <3.6 (adjusted HR = 3.14; 95% CI, 1.70-5.77).
  
  
  
  Intraoperative parameters are predictive of long-term adverse outcomes of RFA independent of patient clinical characteristics. Uterine length, procedure duration, and RFA index are associated with unfavorable outcomes and thus could be used to optimize postprocedure patient counseling.
authors: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.
authors: Sherif A M
authors: SA
authors: Shazly
authors: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. Electronic address: famuyide.abimbola@mayo.edu.
authors: Abimbola O
authors: AO
authors: Famuyide
authors: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
authors: Sherif A
authors: SA
authors: El-Nashar
authors: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
authors: Daniel M
authors: DM
authors: Breitkopf
authors: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
authors: Matthew R
authors: MR
authors: Hopkins
authors: Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
authors: Shannon K
authors: SK
authors: Laughlin-Tommaso
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D017115:Catheter Ablation; D015331:Cohort Studies; D004412:Dysmenorrhea / Q000601:surgery; D055356:Endometrial Ablation Techniques / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007044:Hysterectomy / Q000379:methods*; D008595:Menorrhagia / Q000601:surgery*; D008875:Middle Aged; D016016:Proportional Hazards Models; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012307:Risk Factors
keywords: Endometrial ablation; Hysterectomy; NovaSure; Uterine bleeding