title: How to decide on stent insertion or surgery in colorectal obstruction?
abstract: Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers in western society and malignant obstruction of the colon accounts for 8%-29% of all large bowel obstructions. Conventional treatment of these patients with malignant obstruction requiring urgent surgery is associated with a greater physiological insult on already nutritionally replete patients. Of late the utility of colonic stents has offered an option in the management of these patients in both the palliative and bridge to surgery setting. This has been the subject of many reviews which highlight its efficacy, particulary in reducing ostomy rates, allowing quicker return to oral diet, minimising extended post-operative recovery as well as some quality of life benefits. The uncertainity in managing patients with malignant colonic obstructions has lead to a more cautious use of stenting technology as community equipoise exists. Decision making analysis has demonstrated that surgeons' favored the use of stents in the palliative setting preferentially when compared to the curative setting where surgery was preferred. We aim to review the literature regarding the use of stent or surgery in colorectal obstruction, and then provide a discourse with regards to the approach in synthesising the data and applying it when deciding the appropriate application of stent or surgery in colorectal obstruction.
authors: Assad Zahid, Christopher John Young, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia.
authors: Assad
authors: A
authors: Zahid
authors: Assad Zahid, Christopher John Young, Department of Colorectal Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia.
authors: Christopher John
authors: CJ
authors: Young
keywords: Colorectal cancer; Large bowel obstruction; Radiology; Self-expanding metallic stent; Stenting; Surgery