title: Two different mechanisms for the detection of stimulus omission.
abstract: Although we can detect slight changes in musical rhythm, the underlying neural mechanism remains elusive. Here we show that two distinct mechanisms are automatically selected depending on the speed of the rhythm. When human subjects detected a single omission of isochronous repetitive auditory stimuli, reaction time strongly depended on the stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) for shorter SOAs (<250 ms), but was almost constant for longer SOAs. For shorter SOAs, subjects were unable to detect stimulus omission when either monaural stimuli or those in different frequencies were randomly presented. In contrast, for longer SOAs, reaction time increased when different tempos were presented simultaneously to different ears. These results suggest that depending on the speed of rhythms, the brain may use either temporal grouping of discrete sounds or temporal prediction of upcoming stimuli to detect the absence of a regular stimulus. Because we also found a similar relationship between reaction time and SOA for both visual and tactile stimuli, dual detection strategies could be generalized to other sensory modalities.
authors: Department of Physiology, Hokkaido University School of Medicine, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan.|Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
authors: Shogo
authors: S
authors: Ohmae
authors: Department of Physiology, Hokkaido University School of Medicine, Sapporo 060-8638, Japan.
authors: Masaki
authors: M
authors: Tanaka
mesh_terms: D000161:Acoustic Stimulation / Q000379:methods*; D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D005072:Evoked Potentials, Auditory; D006801:Humans; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult