title: Information preferences for the evaluation of coastal development impacts on ecosystem services: A multi-criteria assessment in the Australian context.
abstract: Ecosystem based management requires the integration of various types of assessment indicators. Understanding stakeholders' information preferences is important, in selecting those indicators that best support management and policy. Both the preferences of decision-makers and the general public may matter, in democratic participatory management institutions. This paper presents a multi-criteria analysis aimed at quantifying the relative importance to these groups of economic, ecological and socio-economic indicators usually considered when managing ecosystem services in a coastal development context. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is applied within two nationwide surveys in Australia, and preferences of both the general public and decision-makers for these indicators are elicited and compared. Results show that, on average across both groups, the priority in assessing a generic coastal development project is for the ecological assessment of its impacts on marine biodiversity. Ecological assessment indicators are globally preferred to both economic and socio-economic indicators regardless of the nature of the impacts studied. These results are observed for a significantly larger proportion of decision-maker than general public respondents, questioning the extent to which the general public's preferences are well reflected in decision-making processes.
authors: Université de Bretagne Occidentale, UMR AMURE, Brest, France; CSIRO Wealth from Oceans Flagship, Marine and Atmospheric Research, Brisbane, Australia; School of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia. Electronic address: jean-baptistem@spc.int.
authors: Jean-Baptiste
authors: JB
authors: Marre
authors: CSIRO Wealth from Oceans Flagship, Marine and Atmospheric Research, Brisbane, Australia.
authors: Sean
authors: S
authors: Pascoe
authors: Ifremer, UMR M101, AMURE, Unité d'Économie Maritime, Brest, France; School of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
authors: Olivier
authors: O
authors: Thébaud
authors: Tasmanian School of Business and Economics, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
authors: Sarah
authors: S
authors: Jennings
authors: Université de Bretagne Occidentale, UMR AMURE, Brest, France.
authors: Jean
authors: J
authors: Boncoeur
authors: School of Economics and Finance, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
authors: Louisa
authors: L
authors: Coglan
mesh_terms: D001315:Australia; D044822:Biodiversity; D003247:Conservation of Natural Resources / Q000191:economics* / Q000379:methods*; D003657:Decision Making; D004463:Ecology; D017753:Ecosystem; D011640:Public Policy; D012959:Socioeconomic Factors
keywords: Analytic hierarchy process; Australia; Coastal development; Ecosystem services assessment; Information preferences; Multi-criteria analysis