title: The applicability of chemical alternatives assessment for engineered nanomaterials.
abstract: The use of alternatives assessment to substitute hazardous chemicals with inherently safer options is gaining momentum worldwide as a legislative and corporate strategy to minimize consumer, occupational, and environmental risks. Engineered nanomaterials represent an interesting case for alternatives assessment approaches, because they can be considered both emerging "chemicals" of concern, as well as potentially safer alternatives to hazardous chemicals. However, comparing the hazards of nanomaterials to traditional chemicals or to other nanomaterials is challenging, and critical elements in chemical hazard and exposure assessment may have to be fundamentally altered to sufficiently address nanomaterials. The aim of this paper is to assess the overall applicability of alternatives assessment methods for nanomaterials and to outline recommendations to enhance their use in this context. The present paper focuses on the adaptability of existing hazard and exposure assessment approaches to engineered nanomaterials as well as strategies to design inherently safer nanomaterials. We argue that alternatives assessment for nanomaterials is complicated by the sheer number of nanomaterials possible. As a result, the inclusion of new data tools that can efficiently and effectively evaluate nanomaterials as substitutes is needed to strengthen the alternatives assessment process. However, we conclude that with additional tools to enhance traditional hazard and exposure assessment modules of alternatives assessment, such as the use of mechanistic toxicity screens and control banding tools, alternatives assessment can be adapted to evaluate engineered nanomaterials as potential substitutes for chemicals of concern and to ensure safer nanomaterials are incorporated in the design of new products. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2017;13:177-187. © 2016 SETAC.
authors.affiliation: Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
authors.forename: Rune
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Hjorth
authors.affiliation: Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
authors.forename: Steffen Foss
authors.initials: SF
authors.lastname: Hansen
authors.affiliation: University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell Center for Sustainable Production, Lowell, Massachusetts, USA.
authors.forename: Molly
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Jacobs
authors.affiliation: University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell Center for Sustainable Production, Lowell, Massachusetts, USA.
authors.forename: Joel
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Tickner
authors.affiliation: University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell Center for Sustainable Production, Lowell, Massachusetts, USA.|University of Massachusetts Lowell, Massachusetts Toxics Use Reduction Institute, Lowell, Massachusetts, USA.
authors.forename: Michael
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Ellenbecker
authors.affiliation: Department of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
authors.forename: Anders
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Baun
mesh_terms: D062067:Chemical Safety; D055772:Green Chemistry Technology; D015386:Hazardous Substances / Q000633:toxicity*; D049329:Nanostructures / Q000633:toxicity*; D018570:Risk Assessment / Q000379:methods*
chemical_list: D015386:Hazardous Substances
keywords: Alternatives assessment; Decision making; Engineered nanomaterials; Hazard; Safety by design