title: Developing and Evaluating Medical Humanities Problem-Based Learning Classes Facilitated by the Teaching Assistants Majored in the Liberal Arts: A Longitudinal Crossover Study.
abstract: Although medical humanities courses taught by teachers from nonmedical backgrounds are not unusual now, few studies have compared the outcome of medical humanities courses facilitated by physicians to that by teaching assistants majored in the liberal arts. The objectives of this study were to (1) analyze the satisfaction of medical students with medical humanities problem-based learning (PBL) classes facilitated by nonmedical teaching assistants (TAF) majored in the liberal arts, and those facilitated by the attending physicians (APF) and (2) examine the satisfaction of medical students with clinical medicine-related and clinical medicine-unrelated medical humanities PBL classes.A total of 123 medical students, randomly assigned to 16 groups, participated in this study. There were 16 classes in the course: 8 of them were TAF classes; and the others were APF classes. Each week, each group rotated from 1 subject of the 16 subjects of PBL to another subject. All of the 16 groups went through all the 16 subjects in the 2013 spring semester. We examined the medical students' satisfaction with each class, based on a rating score collected after each class was completed, using a scale from 0 (the lowest satisfaction) to 100 (the highest satisfaction). We also conducted multivariate linear regression analysis to examine the association between the independent variables and the students' satisfaction.Medical students were more satisfied with the TAF (91.35 ± 7.75) medical humanities PBL classes than APF (90.40 ± 8.42) medical humanities PBL classes (P = 0.01). Moreover, medical students were more satisfied with the clinical medicine-unrelated topics (92.00 ± 7.10) than the clinical medicine-related topics (90.36 ± 7.99) in the medical humanities PBL course (P = 0.01).This medical humanities PBL course, including nonmedical subjects and topics, and nonmedical teaching assistants from the liberal arts as class facilitators, was satisfactory. This pedagogical approach of student-centered, nonmedical topics, nonmedical facilitators, and small groups, which is associated with a deep approach to learning medical humanities, should be highly encouraged.
authors.affiliation: From the Department of Internal Medicine (F-YT, T-WK), National Taiwan University Hospital; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (J-YS), National Taiwan University Hospital; Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Bioethics (C-CW, T-SC, and Y-YC), National Taiwan University College of Medicine.
authors.forename: Fen-Yu
authors.initials: FY
authors.lastname: Tseng
authors.forename: Jeng-Yi
authors.initials: JY
authors.lastname: Shieh
authors.forename: Tze-Wah
authors.initials: TW
authors.lastname: Kao
authors.forename: Chau-Chung
authors.initials: CC
authors.lastname: Wu
authors.forename: Tzong-Shinn
authors.initials: TS
authors.lastname: Chu
authors.forename: Yen-Yuan
authors.initials: YY
authors.lastname: Chen
mesh_terms: D018592:Cross-Over Studies; D004501:Education, Medical / Q000379:methods; D005180:Faculty, Medical; D005260:Female; D006809:Humanities / Q000193:education*; D006801:Humans; D008137:Longitudinal Studies; D008297:Male; D010549:Personal Satisfaction; D018794:Problem-Based Learning / Q000379:methods; D011446:Prospective Studies; D013337:Students, Medical