title: The 10 largest public and philanthropic funders of health research in the world: what they fund and how they distribute their funds.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Little is known about who the main public and philanthropic funders of health research are globally, what they fund and how they decide what gets funded. This study aims to identify the 10 largest public and philanthropic health research funding organizations in the world, to report on what they fund, and on how they distribute their funds.
  
  
  METHODS
  The world's key health research funding organizations were identified through a search strategy aimed at identifying different types of funding organizations. Organizations were ranked by their reported total annual health research expenditures. For the 10 largest funding organizations, data were collected on (1) funding amounts allocated towards 20 health areas, and (2) schemes employed for distributing funding (intramural/extramural, project/'people'/organizational and targeted/untargeted funding). Data collection consisted of a review of reports and websites and interviews with representatives of funding organizations. Data collection was challenging; data were often not reported or reported using different classification systems.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Overall, 55 key health research funding organizations were identified. The 10 largest funding organizations together funded research for $37.1 billion, constituting 40% of all public and philanthropic health research spending globally. The largest funder was the United States National Institutes of Health ($26.1 billion), followed by the European Commission ($3.7 billion), and the United Kingdom Medical Research Council ($1.3 billion). The largest philanthropic funder was the Wellcome Trust ($909.1 million), the largest funder of health research through official development assistance was USAID ($186.4 million), and the largest multilateral funder was the World Health Organization ($135.0 million). Funding distribution mechanisms and funding patterns varied substantially between the 10 largest funders.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  There is a need for increased transparency about who the main funders of health research are globally, what they fund and how they decide on what gets funded, and for improving the evidence base for various funding models. Data on organizations' funding patterns and funding distribution mechanisms are often not available, and when they are, they are reported using different classification systems. To start increasing transparency in health research funding, we have established www.healthresearchfunders.org that lists health research funding organizations worldwide and their health research expenditures.
authors.affiliation: Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. rviergever@research4health.org.
authors.forename: Roderik F
authors.initials: RF
authors.lastname: Viergever
authors.affiliation: Department of Metamedica, VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
authors.forename: Thom C C
authors.initials: TC
authors.lastname: Hendriks
mesh_terms: D035843:Biomedical Research / Q000191:economics* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D005381:Financing, Organized / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D005653:Fund Raising / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006801:Humans; D007391:International Cooperation