title: Long-term follow-up for different varicose vein therapies: is surgery still the best?
abstract: Management of varicose vein disease has changed drastically over the past decades. Since its introduction in vein practice, surgery has gone through several stages of evolution until the method of ligation with stripping eventually became and remained the standard for a long time. It was found to be effective at treating the condition and, indications of its beneficial impact on patients' quality of life soon also became evident. However, being associated with significant morbidity, surgery gradually fell out of favour, especially, once the newer endovenous techniques were launched around the turn of the century. These endothermal methods allowed procedures to be carried out under local anaesthetic as day case interventions, often with a similar or even better effect on occlusion rates and quality of life. In addition, there is mounting evidence that these newer techniques might be more cost-effective. This review evaluates surgical treatment of varicose veins compared to endovenous methods and also assesses its place in current phlebological practice.
authors.affiliation: Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK.
authors.forename: Roshan
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Bootun
authors.affiliation: Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK a.h.davies@imperial.ac.uk.
authors.forename: Alun H
authors.initials: AH
authors.lastname: Davies
mesh_terms: D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D006979:Hyperthermia, Induced / Q000379:methods*; D011788:Quality of Life; D013997:Time Factors; D014648:Varicose Veins / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000628:therapy*
keywords: Varicose vein; surgery