title: Do supranational EU institutions make a difference? EU asylum law before and after 'communitarization'.
abstract: This article examines whether the empowerment of the European Union's (EU) supranational institutions has had an impact on the development of EU asylum. By systematically investigating EU asylum law before and after 'communitarization', it argues that its 'policy core' has maintained a high degree of continuity. An advocacy coalition under the leadership of the interior ministers managed to co-opt pivotal actors in the newly empowered European Commission and European Parliament. By contenting themselves with changes of secondary order, these EU institutions accepted and institutionalized the restrictive and weakly integrated core of EU asylum set by the Council in the first negotiation round. Their role and decisions were driven not only by the negotiation dynamics and political expediency, but also by new inter- and intra-institutional norms fostering consensual practices.
authors.forename: Ariadna
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Ripoll Servent
authors.forename: Florian
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Trauner
keywords: Advocacy coalitions; EU asylum; EU institutions; policy change; treaty reform