title: Measuring the Quality of University Lectures: Development and Validation of the Instructional Skills Questionnaire (ISQ).
abstract: In higher education, student ratings are often used to evaluate and improve the quality of courses and professors' instructional skills. Unfortunately, student-rating questionnaires rarely generate specific feedback for professors to improve their instructional skills. The impact of student ratings on professors' instructional skills has proven to be low. This study concerns the psychometric properties of the Instructional Skills Questionnaire (ISQ), a new theory-based student-rating-of-teaching questionnaire with specific questions concerning lecturing skills. The ISQ is administered after a single lecture. This way, it serves as a formative feedback instrument for university professors during courses to assist them to improve and (re-) evaluate their skills if necessary. The ISQ contains seven dimensions of professors' instructional skills and three student (self perceived) learning outcomes. In this study, Dutch students in 75 courses rated three 90-minute lectures (T1, T2 and T3) of their respective professors using the ISQ. In total, 14,298 ISQ-forms were used to rate 225 lectures. The teacher level reliabilities of the seven dimensions were found to be good at each measurement occasion. In addition, confirmatory multilevel factor analysis confirmed a seven dimensional factor structure at the teacher level at each measurement occasion. Furthermore, specific teacher level factors significantly predicted students' (self-assessed) learning outcomes. These results partly supported the proposed theoretical framework on the relationship between the ISQ teaching dimensions and the student learning process, and provided evidence for the construct validity of the instrument. In sum, the ISQ is found to be a reliable and valid instrument, which can be used by professors and faculty development centers to assess and improve university teaching.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychological Methods, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
authors.forename: Mariska H
authors.initials: MH
authors.lastname: Knol
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychological Methods, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
authors.forename: Conor V
authors.initials: CV
authors.lastname: Dolan
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychological Methods, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
authors.forename: Gideon J
authors.initials: GJ
authors.lastname: Mellenbergh
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychological Methods, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
authors.forename: Han L J
authors.initials: HL
authors.lastname: van der Maas
mesh_terms: D005178:Faculty; D007858:Learning; D011361:Professional Competence; D011786:Quality Control; D013334:Students; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014495:Universities