title: Evaluation of marginal fit and internal adaptation of zirconia copings fabricated by two CAD - CAM systems: An in vitro study.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Three main factors which determine the success of an All-ceramic restoration are esthetic value, resistance to fracture and third being the marginal fit. Marginal fit and internal adaptation are crucial factors in increasing the longevity of the restoration. Newer and economical CAD CAM systems have been introduced claiming better marginal fit and adaptation of All ceramic crowns. CAD CAM systems involves scanning of the die or the tooth preparation and milling of the restoration, which may have variations among the systems available.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  Our study intended to check the marginal fit and internal adaptation of commonly used CAD CAM systems namely CERAMILL and CEREC -In Lab MC XL.
  
  
  METHODS
  Two groups of typodont teeth (n = 10) were prepared using a standardized protocol to receive All ceramic copings. 10 samples of Group A were used for fabrication of copings using CERAMILL system and 10 samples of Group B were used for fabrication of copings using CEREC -In Lab MC XL system. They were then luted with glass ionomer cement under mild finger pressure. Samples were embedded in resin and sliced longitudinally. They were then viewed under stereomicroscope and readings were measured along 15 points using ImageScope software. The P value was set at 0.05 at 95% confidence interval with 80% power. The data were checked for normality and unpaired t-test was used to evaluate the results of the two groups.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The overall internal adaptation was 61.5 ± 5.2 μm for CERAMILL and 56.9 ± 5.7 μm for CEREC -In Lab MC XL (P < 0.05). The marginal fit for CERAMILL was 83 μm and for CEREC -In Lab MC XL was 68 μm (P < 0.05).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The marginal adaptation of CEREC -In Lab MC XL (68 μm) was found to be superior to CERAMILL (83 μm) (P < 0.05). Both the CEREC -In Lab MC XL and CERAMILL copings demonstrated internal adaptation and marginal fit within acceptable discrepancy range. When corroborating both the internal adaptation and marginal fit, CEREC -In Lab MC XL was found to be better than CERAMILL.
authors.affiliation: Department of Prosthodontics, Indira Gandhi Institute of Dental Sciences, Puducherry, India.
authors.forename: Balaji N
authors.initials: BN
authors.lastname: Rajan
authors.affiliation: Department of Prosthodontics, Indira Gandhi Institute of Dental Sciences, Puducherry, India.
authors.forename: Srinivasan
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Jayaraman
authors.affiliation: Department of Prosthodontics, Venkateswara Dental College and Hospital, Puducherry, India.
authors.forename: Baburajan
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Kandhasamy
authors.affiliation: Department of Prosthodontics, Indira Gandhi Institute of Dental Sciences, Puducherry, India.
authors.forename: Ilangkumaran
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Rajakumaran
keywords: All ceramic coping; CERAMILL CAD CAM; CEREC CAD CAM; internal adaptation; marginal fit