title: How social interactions affect emotional memory accuracy: Evidence from collaborative retrieval and social contagion paradigms.
abstract: In daily life, emotional events are often discussed with others. The influence of these social interactions on the veracity of emotional memories has rarely been investigated. The authors (Choi, Kensinger, & Rajaram Memory and Cognition, 41, 403-415, 2013) previously demonstrated that when the categorical relatedness of information is controlled, emotional items are more accurately remembered than neutral items. The present study examined whether emotion would continue to improve the accuracy of memory when individuals discussed the emotional and neutral events with others. Two different paradigms involving social influences were used to investigate this question and compare evidence. In both paradigms, participants studied stimuli that were grouped into conceptual categories of positive (e.g., celebration), negative (e.g., funeral), or neutral (e.g., astronomy) valence. After a 48-hour delay, recognition memory was tested for studied items and categorically related lures. In the first paradigm, recognition accuracy was compared when memory was tested individually or in a collaborative triad. In the second paradigm, recognition accuracy was compared when a prior retrieval session had occurred individually or with a confederate who supplied categorically related lures. In both of these paradigms, emotional stimuli were remembered more accurately than were neutral stimuli, and this pattern was preserved when social interaction occurred. In fact, in the first paradigm, there was a trend for collaboration to increase the beneficial effect of emotion on memory accuracy, and in the second paradigm, emotional lures were significantly less susceptible to the "social contagion" effect. Together, these results demonstrate that emotional memories can be more accurate than nonemotional ones even when events are discussed with others (Experiment 1) and even when that discussion introduces misinformation (Experiment 2).
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Boston College, McGuinn Hall Rm. 300, 140 Commonwealth Avenue., Chestnut Hill, MA, 02467, USA. Elizabeth.kensinger@bc.edu.
authors.forename: Elizabeth A
authors.initials: EA
authors.lastname: Kensinger
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology|, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
authors.forename: Hae-Yoon
authors.initials: HY
authors.lastname: Choi
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Boston College, McGuinn Hall Rm. 300, 140 Commonwealth Avenue., Chestnut Hill, MA, 02467, USA.
authors.forename: Brendan D
authors.initials: BD
authors.lastname: Murray
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology|, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
authors.forename: Suparna
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Rajaram
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D004644:Emotions / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D011939:Mental Recall / Q000502:physiology*; D021641:Recognition, Psychology / Q000502:physiology*; D012938:Social Perception; D055815:Young Adult
keywords: Emotion; False memory; Recognition; Social influences; Valence