title: Impacts of nonstate, market-driven governance on Chilean forests.
abstract: Global markets for agricultural products, timber, and minerals are critically important drivers of deforestation. The supply chains driving land use change may also provide opportunities to halt deforestation. Market campaigns, moratoria, and certification schemes have been promoted as powerful tools to achieve conservation goals. Despite their promise, there have been few opportunities to rigorously quantify the ability of these nonstate, market-driven (NSMD) governance regimes to deliver conservation outcomes. This study analyzes the impacts of three NSMD governance systems that sought to end the conversion of natural forests to plantations in Chile at the start of the 21st century. Using a multilevel, panel dataset of land use changes in Chile, we identify the impact of participation within each of the governance regimes by implementing a series of matched difference-in-differences analyses. Taking advantage of the mosaic of different NSMD regimes adopted in Chile, we explore the relative effectiveness of different policies. NSMD governance regimes reduced deforestation on participating properties by 2-23%. The NSMD governance regimes we studied included collaborative and confrontational strategies between environmental and industry stakeholders. We find that the more collaborative governance systems studied achieved better environmental performance than more confrontational approaches. Whereas many government conservation programs have targeted regions with little likelihood of conversion, we demonstrate that NSMD governance has the potential to alter behavior on high-deforestation properties.
authors.affiliation: Emmett Interdisciplinary Program for Environment and Resources, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305; elambin@stanford.edu heilmayr@stanford.edu.
authors.forename: Robert
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Heilmayr
authors.affiliation: Georges Lemaître Centre for Earth and Climate Research, Earth and Life Institute, Université Catholique de Louvain, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium; School of Earth, Energy, and Environmental Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305; Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 elambin@stanford.edu heilmayr@stanford.edu.
authors.forename: Eric F
authors.initials: EF
authors.lastname: Lambin
mesh_terms: D002568:Certification / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000592:standards; D002677:Chile; D003132:Commerce; D003247:Conservation of Natural Resources / Q000191:economics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000639:trends; D058735:Environmental Policy / Q000191:economics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D016468:Forestry / Q000191:economics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000458:organization & administration* / Q000592:standards; D065928:Forests
keywords: certification; deforestation; program evaluation; supply chains; timber