title: The Differential Outcomes Effect in Pigeons (Columba livia): Is It Truly Anticipatory?
abstract: We used delay-interval interference to investigate the nature of the differential outcomes effect (DOE) in pigeons. Birds were trained on a delayed matching-to-sample (DMS) task under either common outcome or differential outcome conditions, and then presented with visual interference during the delay period. Consistent with previous literature, the common outcomes birds were slower to learn the DMS task than the differential outcomes birds. The common outcome birds were also more impaired by the visual interference than the differential outcomes birds. Our findings are consistent with the view that the birds trained with common outcomes were likely remembering the sample stimulus during the delay period, and hence were disrupted by the visual interference, whereas the birds trained with differential outcomes were likely relying on the different emotional reactions elicited by the different outcomes to guide their choice behaviour, and hence were less affected by the visual interference. Our findings suggest that the DOE is not truly evidence of anticipatory mediation of short-term retention in pigeons, but rather emotionally driven decision making, which is not truly anticipatory in nature.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
authors.forename: Marijn
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Kouwenhoven
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
authors.forename: Michael
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Colombo
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D003071:Cognition; D010856:Columbidae / Q000502:physiology*; D004193:Discrimination Learning; D011897:Random Allocation; D014796:Visual Perception