title: Four Common Simplifications of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis do not hold for River Rehabilitation.
abstract: River rehabilitation aims at alleviating negative effects of human impacts such as loss of biodiversity and reduction of ecosystem services. Such interventions entail difficult trade-offs between different ecological and often socio-economic objectives. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) is a very suitable approach that helps assessing the current ecological state and prioritizing river rehabilitation measures in a standardized way, based on stakeholder or expert preferences. Applications of MCDA in river rehabilitation projects are often simplified, i.e. using a limited number of objectives and indicators, assuming linear value functions, aggregating individual indicator assessments additively, and/or assuming risk neutrality of experts. Here, we demonstrate an implementation of MCDA expert preference assessments to river rehabilitation and provide ample material for other applications. To test whether the above simplifications reflect common expert opinion, we carried out very detailed interviews with five river ecologists and a hydraulic engineer. We defined essential objectives and measurable quality indicators (attributes), elicited the experts´ preferences for objectives on a standardized scale (value functions) and their risk attitude, and identified suitable aggregation methods. The experts recommended an extensive objectives hierarchy including between 54 and 93 essential objectives and between 37 to 61 essential attributes. For 81% of these, they defined non-linear value functions and in 76% recommended multiplicative aggregation. The experts were risk averse or risk prone (but never risk neutral), depending on the current ecological state of the river, and the experts´ personal importance of objectives. We conclude that the four commonly applied simplifications clearly do not reflect the opinion of river rehabilitation experts. The optimal level of model complexity, however, remains highly case-study specific depending on data and resource availability, the context, and the complexity of the decision problem.
authors.affiliation: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Eawag, Duebendorf, Switzerland.
authors.forename: Simone D
authors.initials: SD
authors.lastname: Langhans
authors.affiliation: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Eawag, Duebendorf, Switzerland.
authors.forename: Judit
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Lienert
mesh_terms: D000465:Algorithms; D044822:Biodiversity; D003661:Decision Support Techniques; D017753:Ecosystem; D006801:Humans; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D045483:Rivers