title: Internal Versus External Fixation for the Treatment of Distal Radial Fractures: A Systematic Review of Overlapping Meta-Analyses.
abstract: Although a serious of meta-analyses have been published to compare the effects of internal versus external fixation (IF vs EF) for treating distal radial fractures (DRF), no consensus was obtained.B y performing a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses comparing IF versus EF for the treatment of distal radial fractures, we attempted to evaluate the methodology and reporting quality of these meta-analyses, interpret the source of discordant results, and therefore determine the dominant strategy for the treatment of distal radial fractures based on the best evidence currently. An electronic databases search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane library to retrieve meta-analyses comparing IF versus EF for treating DRF. Reference lists of relevant literatures were also screened manually to retrieve additional ones. Two investigators independently assessed the eligibility of retrieved articles using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. All characteristics as well as outcome variables including functional outcomes, range of motion, radiological results, and complication rates with relevant heterogeneity information presented in each included study were extracted. Heterogeneity was thought to be significant when I² > 50%. We adopted the Oxford Levels of Evidence and the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) Instrument to assess the methodological quality of every included study, and applied the Jadad decision algorithm to select studies with more likely reliable conclusions. A total of 8 studies met the inclusion criteria. The AMSTAR scores ranged from 5 to 9 with a median of 7.75. Following the Jadad algorithm, the meta-analyses with most reliable results can be selected based on the search strategies and application of selection. Finally, 2 meta-analyses with most RCTs and highest AMSTAR scores were selected in this systematic review of overlapping meta-analysis. The best available evidence suggested that compared with EF, IF was significantly associated with lower Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores, better rehabilitation of volar tilt and radial inclination, and lower infection rate at 1-year follow-up. Therefore, we could conclude that internal fixation is superior to external fixations for the treatment of distal radial fractures.
authors.affiliation: From the Department of Orthopedics (QZ, ZL, JL), Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong; Department of Orthopedics (FL, BW, DZ, JD, YH), Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong; and Department of Joint Surgery (ZX), Heze Municipal Hospital, Heze, Shandong, China.
authors.forename: Qingyu
authors.initials: Q
authors.lastname: Zhang
authors.forename: Fanxiao
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Liu
authors.forename: Zhenyun
authors.initials: Z
authors.lastname: Xiao
authors.forename: Zhenfeng
authors.initials: Z
authors.lastname: Li
authors.forename: Bomin
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Wang
authors.forename: Jinlei
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Dong
authors.forename: Yong
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Han
authors.forename: Dongsheng
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Zhou
authors.forename: Jianmin
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Li
mesh_terms: D000465:Algorithms; D003657:Decision Making; D005592:Fracture Fixation; D005593:Fracture Fixation, Internal; D006801:Humans; D011885:Radius Fractures / Q000601:surgery*