title: What Do Contrast Threshold Equivalent Noise Studies Actually Measure? Noise vs. Nonlinearity in Different Masking Paradigms.
abstract: The internal noise present in a linear system can be quantified by the equivalent noise method. By measuring the effect that applying external noise to the system's input has on its output one can estimate the variance of this internal noise. By applying this simple "linear amplifier" model to the human visual system, one can entirely explain an observer's detection performance by a combination of the internal noise variance and their efficiency relative to an ideal observer. Studies using this method rely on two crucial factors: firstly that the external noise in their stimuli behaves like the visual system's internal noise in the dimension of interest, and secondly that the assumptions underlying their model are correct (e.g. linearity). Here we explore the effects of these two factors while applying the equivalent noise method to investigate the contrast sensitivity function (CSF). We compare the results at 0.5 and 6 c/deg from the equivalent noise method against those we would expect based on pedestal masking data collected from the same observers. We find that the loss of sensitivity with increasing spatial frequency results from changes in the saturation constant of the gain control nonlinearity, and that this only masquerades as a change in internal noise under the equivalent noise method. Part of the effect we find can be attributed to the optical transfer function of the eye. The remainder can be explained by either changes in effective input gain, divisive suppression, or a combination of the two. Given these effects the efficiency of our observers approaches the ideal level. We show the importance of considering these factors in equivalent noise studies.
authors.affiliation: McGill Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
authors.forename: Alex S
authors.initials: AS
authors.lastname: Baldwin
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of York, York, England.
authors.forename: Daniel H
authors.initials: DH
authors.lastname: Baker
authors.affiliation: McGill Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
authors.forename: Robert F
authors.initials: RF
authors.lastname: Hess
mesh_terms: D000465:Algorithms; D015350:Contrast Sensitivity; D006801:Humans; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D009622:Noise; D010470:Perceptual Masking; D012684:Sensory Thresholds