title: Do urologists follow the golden rule? A global urolithiasis management study by the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The primary objective of this study was to compare surgical management options for various urolithiasis scenarios that urologists would choose for themselves vs. the options they would recommend for their patients. The secondary objective was to identify the common recommended treatments for upper urinary tract stones of various sizes and locations.
  
  
  METHODS
  Two surveys were sent by the Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES) to members of the Endourological Society. Standard demographic information was collected. The first survey asked the urologists to recommend treatment for urolithiasis in 10 different scenarios assuming that they were the patient with stone disease. The second survey, sent eight months later, asked urologists to recommend treatment for the same 10 scenarios for a theoretical patient. Only urologists who responded to the first and the second survey were included. Recommended treatment options were compared between the surveys. Agreement between the two scenarios was measured with Cohen's kappa. Surveys were conducted on the Internet using SurveyMonkey™. All statistical analyses were performed using R statistical program version 2.12.2.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The two surveys had response rates of 78% (160/205) and 84% (172/205), respectively with urologists from 38 countries. Median experience of respondents was seven years (range: 2-30). The majority of respondents, 117 (75%), were affiliated with academic hospitals. Recommended treatments for stone disease in different scenarios were not entirely consistent when the urologists considered themselves as the patients compared to the choice they might recommend for their patients. Cohen's kappa ranged from 0.292-0.534 for the different scenarios. Overall, shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) and ureteroscopy (URS) were the most commonly chosen treatment options, with medical expulsive therapy (MET) and laparoscopy being the least recommended by urologists for themselves, as well as for their patients.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Although urologists were not entirely consistent in their recommendations for stone treatment, they generally followed the "golden rule" and treated their patients as they would want to be treated. The most commonly recommended treatments for upper urinary tract stones were SWL and URS.
authors.affiliation: Department of Urology, Queen's University Kingston, ON, Canada;
authors.forename: Gregory
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Roberts
authors.affiliation: Department of Urology, AMC University Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
authors.forename: Dedan
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Opondo
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
authors.forename: Linda
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Nott
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
authors.forename: Hassan
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Razvi
authors.affiliation: Department of Urology, AMC University Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
authors.forename: Jean
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: de la Rosette
authors.affiliation: Department of Urology, Queen's University Kingston, ON, Canada;
authors.forename: Darren
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Beiko