title: Tissue growth constrained by extracellular matrix drives invagination during optic cup morphogenesis.
abstract: In the early embryo, the eyes form initially as relatively spherical optic vesicles (OVs) that protrude from both sides of the brain tube. Each OV grows until it contacts and adheres to the overlying surface ectoderm (SE) via an extracellular matrix (ECM) that is secreted by the SE and OV. The OV and SE then thicken and bend inward (invaginate) to create the optic cup (OC) and lens vesicle, respectively. While constriction of cell apices likely plays a role in SE invagination, the mechanisms that drive OV invagination are poorly understood. Here, we used experiments and computational modeling to explore the hypothesis that the ECM locally constrains the growing OV, forcing it to invaginate. In chick embryos, we examined the need for the ECM by (1) removing SE at different developmental stages and (2) exposing the embryo to collagenase. At relatively early stages of invagination (Hamburger-Hamilton stage HH14[Formula: see text]), removing the SE caused the curvature of the OV to reverse as it 'popped out' and became convex, but the OV remained concave at later stages (HH15) and invaginated further during subsequent culture. Disrupting the ECM had a similar effect, with the OV popping out at early to mid-stages of invagination (HH14[Formula: see text] to HH14[Formula: see text]). These results suggest that the ECM is required for the early stages but not the late stages of OV invagination. Microindentation tests indicate that the matrix is considerably stiffer than the cellular OV, and a finite-element model consisting of a growing spherical OV attached to a relatively stiff layer of ECM reproduced the observed behavior, as well as measured temporal changes in OV curvature, wall thickness, and invagination depth reasonably well. Results from our study also suggest that the OV grows relatively uniformly, while the ECM is stiffer toward the center of the optic vesicle. These results are consistent with our matrix-constraint hypothesis, providing new insight into the mechanics of OC (early retina) morphogenesis.
authors.affiliation: Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University, One Brookings Drive, Campus Box 1097, Saint Louis, MO, 63130-4899, USA. aoltean@go.wustl.edu.
authors.forename: Alina
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Oltean
authors.affiliation: Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University, Saint Louis, MO, 63130, USA.
authors.forename: Jie
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Huang
authors.affiliation: Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Washington University, Saint Louis, MO, 63130, USA.
authors.forename: David C
authors.initials: DC
authors.lastname: Beebe
authors.affiliation: Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University, One Brookings Drive, Campus Box 1097, Saint Louis, MO, 63130-4899, USA.
authors.forename: Larry A
authors.initials: LA
authors.lastname: Taber
mesh_terms: D000199:Actins / Q000378:metabolism; D000818:Animals; D049109:Cell Proliferation; D002642:Chick Embryo; D003198:Computer Simulation; D004475:Ectoderm / Q000378:metabolism; D005109:Extracellular Matrix / Q000378:metabolism*; D051379:Mice; D008954:Models, Biological; D009024:Morphogenesis; D009898:Optic Disk / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000196:embryology / Q000254:growth & development*; D013194:Staining and Labeling; D041623:Tomography, Optical Coherence
chemical_list: D000199:Actins
keywords: Biomechanics; Chick embryo; Computational models; Eye development; Retina development