title: Like Hercules and the Hydra: Trade-offs and strategies in ecological model-building and experimental design.
abstract: Experimental ecologists often invoke trade-offs to describe the constraints they encounter when choosing between alternative experimental designs, such as between laboratory, field, and natural experiments. In making these claims, they tend to rely on Richard Levins' analysis of trade-offs in theoretical model-building. But does Levins' framework apply to experiments? In this paper, I focus this question on one desideratum widely invoked in the modelling literature: generality. Using the case of generality, I assess whether Levins-style treatments of modelling provide workable resources for assessing trade-offs in experimental design. I argue that, of four strategies modellers employ to increase generality, only one may be unproblematically applied to experimental design. Furthermore, modelling desiderata do not have obvious correlates in experimental design, and when we define these desiderata in a way that seem consistent with ecologists' usage, the trade-off framework falls apart. I conclude that a Levins-inspired framework for modelling does not provide the content for a similar approach to experimental practice; this does not, however, mean that it cannot provide the form.
authors.affiliation: Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Pittsburgh, 1017 Cathedral of Learning, 4200 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA. Electronic address: sai22@pitt.edu.
authors.forename: S Andrew
authors.initials: SA
authors.lastname: Inkpen
mesh_terms: D004463:Ecology / Q000379:methods*; D008954:Models, Biological; D012107:Research Design
keywords: Experimental ecology; Experimentation; Generality; Model-building; Richard Levins; Tradeoffs