title: Comparison of National Board of Chiropractic Examiners part I examination scores between tutors and tutees at a chiropractic college.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  This study compared National Board of Chiropractic Examiners part I test scores between students who did and did not serve as tutors on the subject matter.
  
  
  METHODS
  Students who had a prior grade point average of 3.45 or above on a 4.0 scale just before taking part I of the board exams were eligible to participate. A 2-sample t-test was used to ascertain the difference in the mean scores on part I between the tutor group (n = 28) and nontutor (n = 29) group.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Scores were higher in all subjects for the tutor group compared to the nontutor group and the differences were statistically significant (p < .01) with large effect sizes.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The tutors in this study performed better on part I of the board examination compared to nontutors, suggesting that tutoring results in an academic benefit for tutors themselves.
authors.forename: Amilliah W
authors.initials: AW
authors.lastname: Kenya
authors.forename: John F
authors.initials: JF
authors.lastname: Hart
authors.forename: Charles K
authors.initials: CK
authors.lastname: Vuyiya
keywords: Academic Training; Chiropractic; Competency Based Education; Education