title: Are Private Interests Clouding the Peer-Review Process of the WHO Bulletin? A Case Study.
abstract: Readers' trust on the medical literature has been eroded, and journal editors and some editorial boards are taking measures to ensure that authors fully and accurately report research findings and disclose conflicts of interest. This article describes a case study in which the papers editor of the World Health Organization (WHO) Bulletin influenced the content of an article that had been approved by the external reviewers. The editor objected to the publication of the large price differentials of the new molecular entities (NMEs) across the Latin American countries where they had been tested and the limited added therapeutic value of the NMEs that had been assessed by independent drug bulletins. This article summarizes the exchanges with WHO staff and posits the hypothesis that the WHO Bulletin might be affected by the shifts in WHO financing. Several authors have raised concern about the impact of financial conflicts of interest in WHO activities in the field of nutrition, intellectual property, and in the emergency response to the flu pandemic. Moreover, it has been reported that powerful WHO contributors pressured WHO into revising its publication policy. This is the first time that authors question if these conflicts of interest are also affecting the editorial independence of the WHO Bulletin.
authors.affiliation: a Management Policy and Community Health, School of Public Health , University of Texas , El Paso , Texas , USA.
authors.forename: Nuria
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Homedes
authors.affiliation: b Department of Sociology , University of Texas at Austin , Austin , Texas , USA.
authors.forename: Antonio
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Ugalde
mesh_terms: D035843:Biomedical Research / Q000941:ethics / Q000458:organization & administration; D016265:Conflict of Interest; D004345:Drug Industry / Q000941:ethics / Q000458:organization & administration; D035081:Editorial Policies; D006801:Humans; D019982:Organizational Case Studies; D010380:Peer Review / Q000379:methods*; D011643:Publishing / Q000941:ethics / Q000458:organization & administration* / Q000592:standards; D014944:World Health Organization
keywords: Clinical trials; WHO; ethics; pharmaceutical industry; publication bias