title: Of Disasters and Dragon Kings: A Statistical Analysis of Nuclear Power Incidents and Accidents.
abstract: We perform a statistical study of risk in nuclear energy systems. This study provides and analyzes a data set that is twice the size of the previous best data set on nuclear incidents and accidents, comparing three measures of severity: the industry standard International Nuclear Event Scale, the Nuclear Accident Magnitude Scale of radiation release, and cost in U.S. dollars. The rate of nuclear accidents with cost above 20 MM 2013 USD, per reactor per year, has decreased from the 1970s until the present time. Along the way, the rate dropped significantly after Chernobyl (April 1986) and is expected to be roughly stable around a level of 0.003, suggesting an average of just over one event per year across the current global fleet. The distribution of costs appears to have changed following the Three Mile Island major accident (March 1979). The median cost became approximately 3.5 times smaller, but an extremely heavy tail emerged, being well described by a Pareto distribution with parameter α = 0.5-0.6. For instance, the cost of the two largest events, Chernobyl and Fukushima (March 2011), is equal to nearly five times the sum of the 173 other events. We also document a significant runaway disaster regime in both radiation release and cost data, which we associate with the "dragon-king" phenomenon. Since the major accident at Fukushima (March 2011) occurred recently, we are unable to quantify an impact of the industry response to this disaster. Excluding such improvements, in terms of costs, our range of models suggests that there is presently a 50% chance that (i) a Fukushima event (or larger) occurs every 60-150 years, and (ii) that a Three Mile Island event (or larger) occurs every 10-20 years. Further-even assuming that it is no longer possible to suffer an event more costly than Chernobyl or Fukushima-the expected annual cost and its standard error bracket the cost of a new plant. This highlights the importance of improvements not only immediately following Fukushima, but also deeper improvements to effectively exclude the possibility of "dragon-king" disasters. Finally, we find that the International Nuclear Event Scale (INES) is inconsistent in terms of both cost and radiation released. To be consistent with cost data, the Chernobyl and Fukushima disasters would need to have between an INES level of 10 and 11, rather than the maximum of 7.
authors.affiliation: ETH Zurich, Department of Management, Technology and Economics, Switzerland.
authors.forename: Spencer
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Wheatley
authors.affiliation: Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex, UK.|Center for Energy Technologies and Department of Business and Technology, Aarhus University, Denmark.
authors.forename: Benjamin
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Sovacool
authors.affiliation: ETH Zurich, Department of Management, Technology and Economics, Switzerland.
authors.forename: Didier
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Sornette
mesh_terms: D002588:Cesium Radioisotopes / Q000032:analysis*; D047852:Chernobyl Nuclear Accident; D003627:Data Interpretation, Statistical; D004190:Disasters; D062406:Fukushima Nuclear Accident; D006801:Humans; D007564:Japan; D016014:Linear Models; D015233:Models, Statistical; D055848:Nuclear Power Plants; D011336:Probability; D011640:Public Policy; D011834:Radiation Monitoring; D012306:Risk; D013997:Time Factors
chemical_list: D002588:Cesium Radioisotopes
keywords: Nuclear incidents and accidents; quantitative risk analysis; safety analysis