title: Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Robotic-Assisted Surgery with Traditional Laparotomy for Rectal Cancer-Indian Study.
abstract: Rectal cancer is one of the common cancers in India. Surgical management is the mainstay of initial treatment for majority of patients. Minimally invasive surgery has gained acceptance for the surgical treatment of rectal cancer because, compared with laparotomy, it is associated with fewer complications, shorter hospitalization, and faster recovery. The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety, feasibility, technique, and outcomes (postoperative, oncological, and functional) of robotic-assisted rectal surgery in comparison with open surgery in the Indian population. A prospective randomized study was undertaken from August 2011 to December 2012. Fifty patients who presented with rectal carcinoma were randomized to either robotic arm (RA) or open arm (OA) group. Both groups were matched for clinical stage and operation type. Technique and feasibility of robotic-assisted surgery in terms of operating time, estimated blood loss, margins status, total number of lymph nodes retrieved, hospital stay, conversion to open procedure, complications, and functional outcomes were analyzed. The mean operative time was significantly longer in the RA than in the OA group (310 vs 246 min, P < 0.001) but was significantly reduced in the latter part of the robotic-assisted patients compared with the initial patients. The mean estimated blood loss was significantly less in the RA compared with the OA group (165.14 vs 406.04 ml, P < 0.001). None of the patients had margin positivity. The mean distal resection margin was significantly longer in the RA than in the OA group (3.6 vs 2.4 cm, P < 0.001). A total of 100 % of patients in the RA group had complete mesorectal excision while two patients in the OA group had incomplete mesorectal excision. The average number of retrieved lymph nodes was adequate for accurate staging. The number of lymph nodes removed by robotic method is slightly higher than the open method (16.88 vs 15.20) but with no statistical significance. Conversion rate was nil. The mean hospital stay was significantly shorter in the RA group (7.52 vs 13.24 days, P < 0.001). Postoperative and functional outcomes were comparable between the two groups. Robotic-assisted surgery is an emerging technique in our country. Robotic-assisted rectal cancer surgery is safe with low conversion rates and acceptable morbidity and is oncologically feasible.
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgical Oncology, Manipal Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Manipal Hospital, # 98 HAL Airport Road, Bangalore, 560017 India.
authors.forename: S P
authors.initials: SP
authors.lastname: Somashekhar
authors.affiliation: No. 8, Second Anjaneya Temple Street, Seshadripurum, Bangalore, 560020 India.
authors.forename: K R
authors.initials: KR
authors.lastname: Ashwin
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgical Oncology, Manipal Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Manipal Hospital, # 98 HAL Airport Road, Bangalore, 560017 India.
authors.forename: Jaka
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Rajashekhar
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgical Oncology, Manipal Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Manipal Hospital, # 98 HAL Airport Road, Bangalore, 560017 India.
authors.forename: Shabber
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Zaveri
keywords: India; Minimally invasive surgery; Rectal cancer; Robotic surgery