title: [Periprosthetic humeral fractures: Strategies and techniques for osteosynthesis].
abstract: The prevalence of periprosthetic humeral fractures (PHF) is currently low and accounts for 0.6-2.4%. Due to an increase in the rate of primary implantations a quantitative increase of PHF is to be expected in the near future. The majority of PHF occur intraoperatively during implantation with an increased risk for cementless stems and when performing total arthroplasty. Additional risk factors are in particular female gender and the severity of comorbidities. In contrast, postoperative PHF mostly due to low-energy falls, have a prevalence between 0.6% and 0.9% and are significantly less common. The prognosis and functional outcome following revision by open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) essentially depend on a thorough assessment of the indications for revision surgery, the operative treatment and the pretraumatic functional condition of the affected shoulder. In the armamentarium of periprosthetic ORIF of the humerus cerclage systems and locking implants as well as a combination of both play a central role. In comminuted fractures with extensive defect zones, severely thinned cortex or extensive osteolysis a biological augmentation of the ORIF should be considered. In this context when the indications are correctly interpreted, especially in the case of a stable anchored stem, various groups have reported that a high bony union rate can be achieved. As the treatment of PHF is complex it should be performed in dedicated centers in order to adequately address potential comorbidities, especially in the elderly population.
authors.affiliation: Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfallchirurgie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaningerstrasse 22, 81675, München, Deutschland. Chlodwig.Kirchhoff@mri.tum.de.
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Kirchhoff
authors.affiliation: Krankenhaus Agatharied, Hausham, Deutschland.
authors.forename: U
authors.initials: U
authors.lastname: Brunner
authors.affiliation: Klinik und Poliklinik für Unfallchirurgie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaningerstrasse 22, 81675, München, Deutschland.
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Biberthaler
mesh_terms: D000072228:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods; D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine; D005593:Fracture Fixation, Internal / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D057068:Periprosthetic Fractures / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000601:surgery*; D011300:Preoperative Care / Q000379:methods; D012086:Reoperation / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods; D012784:Shoulder Fractures / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000601:surgery*; D000072227:Shoulder Prosthesis; D016896:Treatment Outcome
keywords: Classification; Complication; Osteoporosis; Risk factors; Shoulder arthroplasty