title: Patient-reported outcome measures for hip preservation surgery-a systematic review of the literature.
abstract: Hip preservation surgery is rapidly advancing and patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures are becoming an integral part of measuring treatment effectiveness. Traditionally the modified Harris hip score has been used as the main outcome measure. More recently, new PRO tools in the field have been developed. We performed a systematic review of the English literature from MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and SPORTDiscus databases to identify the PRO tools used in hip preservation surgery. Our aim was to critically appraise the quality of the questionnaire properties in order to recommend the most appropriate PRO tool for future use. Measurement properties of each PRO questionnaire were rated from excellent to poor, based on Terwee criteria and the results from the included studies. Six PRO tools were identified with description or comparison of their measurement properties in 10 articles. While, most recently developed PRO tools, the hip outcome score (HOS), the Copenhagen hip and groin outcome score (HAGOS) and the international hip outcome tool (iHOT-33) scored better than the others in their measurement properties, iHOT-33 scored the best of all the PRO tools and is recommended for future use in hip preservation surgery.
authors.affiliation: 1. Sport Medicine Centre, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.
authors.forename: N
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Ramisetty
authors.affiliation: 2. Health Sciences Centre, 3330 Hospital Dr, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada.
authors.forename: Y
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Kwon
authors.affiliation: 1. Sport Medicine Centre, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.
authors.forename: N
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Mohtadi