title: Evaluation of Scientific Outputs of Kashan University of Medical Sciences in Scopus Citation Database based on Scopus, ResearchGate, and Mendeley Scientometric Measures.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  It is essential to evaluate the impact of scientific publications through citation analysis in citation indexes. In addition, scientometric measures of social media also should be assessed. These measures include how many times the publications were read, viewed, and downloaded. The present study aimed to assess the scientific output of scholars at Kashan University of Medical Sciences by the end of March 2014 based on scientometric measures of Scopus, ResearchGate, and Mendeley.
  
  
  METHODS
  A survey method was used to study the articles published in Scopus journals by scholars at Kashan University of Medical Sciences by the end of March 2014. The required data were collected from Scopus, ResearchGate, and Mendeley. The data were analyzed with descriptive statistics. Also, the Spearman correlation was used between the number of views of articles in ResearchGate with citation number of the articles in Scopus and reading frequency of the articles in Mendeley with citation number in Scopus were examined using the Spearman correlation in SPSS 16.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Five-hundred and thirty-three articles were indexed in the Scopus Citation Database by the end of March 2014. Collectively, those articles were cited 1,315 times. The articles were covered by ResearchGate (74%) more than Mendeley (44%). In addition, 98% of the articles indexed in ResearchGate and 92% of the articles indexed in Mendeley were viewed at least once. The results showed that there was a positive correlation between the number of views of the articles in ResearchGate and Mendeley and the number of citations of the articles in Scopus.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Coverage and the number of visitors were higher in ResearchGate than in Mendeley. The increase in the number of views of articles in ResearchGate and Mendeley also increased the number of citations of the papers. Social networks, such as ResearchGate and Mendeley, also can be used as tools for the evaluation of academics and scholars based on the scientific research they have conducted.
authors.affiliation: Health Information Management Research Center, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran; Ph.D. Student of Knowledge & Information Science, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
authors.forename: Zahra
authors.initials: Z
authors.lastname: Batooli
authors.affiliation: Ph.D. of Library and Information Sciences, Health Information Management Research Center, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran.
authors.forename: Somaye Nadi
authors.initials: SN
authors.lastname: Ravandi
authors.affiliation: Faculty Member, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran.
authors.forename: Mohammad Sabahi
authors.initials: MS
authors.lastname: Bidgoli
keywords: Mendeley; ResearchGate; Scopus; publications; research; scientometric; social media