title: Intentional rounding: facilitators, benefits and barriers.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To describe the implementation, practice and sustainability of Intentional Rounding (IR) within two diverse settings (aged care and maternity).
  
  
  BACKGROUND
  The profile of patients in hospitals has changed over time, generally being more severe, placing heavy demands on nurses' time. Routine non-urgent care is often provided only when there is time. IR has been found to increase both patient and staff satisfaction, also resulting in improved patient outcomes such as reduced falls and call bell use. IR is also used as a time management tool for safe and reliable provision of routine care.
  
  
  METHODS
  This descriptive qualitative research study comprised of three focus groups in a metropolitan hospital.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Fifteen nurses participated in three focus groups. Seven main themes emerged from the thematic analysis of the verbatim transcripts: implementation and maintenance, how IR works, roles and responsibilities, context and environment, benefits, barriers and legal issues.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  IR was quickly incorporated into normal practice, with clinicians being able to describe the main concepts and practices. IR was seen as a management tool, facilitating accountability and continuity of management support being essential for sustainability. Clinicians reported increases in patient and staff satisfaction, and the opportunity to provide patient education. While patient type and acuity, ward layout and staff experience affected the practice of IR, the principles of IR are robust enough to allow for differences in the ward specialty and patient type. However, care must be taken when implementing IR to reduce the risk of alienating experienced staff. Incorporation of IR charts into the patient health care record is recommended.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Engaging all staff, encouraging ownership and stability of management are key factors in the successful implementation and maintenance of IR. IR is flexible and robust enough to accommodate different patient types and acuity.
authors.affiliation: Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
authors.forename: Kelli
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Flowers
authors.affiliation: Neurosurgery, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
authors.forename: Kylie
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Wright
authors.affiliation: Centre for Applied Nursing, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Affiliated with the Ingham Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
authors.forename: Rachel
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Langdon
authors.affiliation: Clinical Governance Unit, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
authors.forename: Maureen
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: McIlwrath
authors.affiliation: Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
authors.forename: Craig
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Wainwright
authors.affiliation: Faculty of Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Affiliated with the Ingham Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
authors.forename: Maree
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Johnson
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D005260:Female; D017144:Focus Groups; D005851:Geriatric Nursing; D006801:Humans; D007588:Job Satisfaction; D008875:Middle Aged; D009517:New South Wales; D009723:Nurse-Patient Relations; D009741:Nursing Staff, Hospital / Q000523:psychology*; D009773:Obstetric Nursing; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D057184:Practice Patterns, Nurses'; D011247:Pregnancy; D058996:Quality Improvement
keywords: intentional rounding; midwifery; nursing; patient safety; patient satisfaction