title: Biomechanics of Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty:  Current Concepts.
abstract: The evolution of reverse shoulder arthroplasty has provided surgeons with new solutions for many complex shoulder problems. A primary goal of orthopaedics is the restoration or re-creation of functional anatomy to reduce pain and improve function, which can be accomplished by either repairing injured structures or replacing them as anatomically as possible. If reconstructible tissue is lacking or not available, which is seen in patients who have complex shoulder conditions such as an irreparable rotator cuff-deficient shoulder, cuff tear arthropathy, or severe glenoid bone loss, substantial problems may arise. Historically, hemiarthroplasty or glenoid grafting with total shoulder arthroplasty yielded inconsistent and unsatisfactory results. Underlying pathologies in patients who have an irreparable rotator cuff-deficient shoulder, cuff tear arthropathy, or severe glenoid bone loss can considerably alter the mechanical function of the shoulder and create treatment dilemmas that are difficult to overcome. A better biomechanical understanding of these pathologic adaptations has improved treatment options. In the past three decades, reverse total shoulder arthroplasty was developed to treat these complex shoulder conditions not by specifically re-creating the anatomy but by using the remaining functional tissue to improve shoulder balance. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty has achieved reliable improvements in both pain and function. Initial implant designs lacked scientific evidence to support the design rationale, and many implants failed because surgeons did not completely understand the forces involved or the pathology being treated. Implant function and clinical results will continue to improve as surgeons' biomechanical understanding of shoulder disease and reverse shoulder arthroplasty implants increases.
authors.affiliation: Orthopaedic Surgeon, Department of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Florida Orthopaedic Institute, Tampa, Florida.
authors.forename: Adam J
authors.initials: AJ
authors.lastname: Lorenzetti
authors.forename: Geoffrey P
authors.initials: GP
authors.lastname: Stone
authors.forename: Peter
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Simon
authors.forename: Mark A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Frankle
mesh_terms: D019643:Arthroplasty, Replacement / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D006801:Humans; D007592:Joint Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000209:etiology / Q000601:surgery*; D007595:Joint Prosthesis; D011474:Prosthesis Design; D016059:Range of Motion, Articular; D020127:Recovery of Function; D017006:Rotator Cuff / Q000601:surgery; D000070636:Rotator Cuff Injuries; D012785:Shoulder Joint / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000473:pathology / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery; D013708:Tendon Injuries / Q000601:surgery*; D016896:Treatment Outcome