title: Long-Term Comparison of Posterior Chamber Phakic Intraocular Lens With and Without a Central Hole (Hole ICL and Conventional ICL) Implantation for Moderate to High Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism: Consort-Compliant Article.
abstract: The study shows a promising next-generation surgical option for the correction of moderate to high ametropia. Hole implantable collamer lens (ICL), STAAR Surgical, is a posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens with a central artificial hole. As yet, however, no long-term comparison of the clinical results of the implantation of ICLs with and without such a hole has hitherto been conducted. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial was carried out in order to compare the long-term clinical outcomes of the implantation, in such eyes, of ICLs with and without a central artificial hole.Examinations were conducted of the 64 eyes of 32 consecutive patients with spherical equivalents of -7.53 ± 2.39 diopters (D) (mean ± standard deviation) in whom implantation of a Hole ICL was performed in 1 eye, and that of a conventional ICL was carried out in the other, by randomized assignment. Before 1, 3, and 6 months, and 1, 3, and 5 years after surgery, the safety, efficacy, predictability, stability, intraocular pressure, endothelial cell density, and adverse events of the 2 surgical techniques were assessed and compared over time.The measurements of LogMAR uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity 5 years postoperatively were -0.17 ± 0.14 and -0.24 ± 0.08 in the Hole ICL group, and -0.16 ± 0.10 and -0.25 ± 0.08 in the conventional ICL group. In these 2 groups, 96% and 100% of eyes, respectively, were within 1.0 D of the targeted correction 5 years postoperatively. Manifest refraction changed by -0.17 ± 0.41 D and -0.10 ± 0.26 D occurred in from 1 month to 5 years in the Hole and conventional ICL groups, respectively. Only 1 eye (3.1%), which was in the conventional ICL group, developed an asymptomatic anterior subcapsular cataract.Both Hole and conventional ICLs corrected of ametropia successfully throughout the 5-year observation period. It appears likely that the presence of the central hole does not significantly affect these visual and refractive outcomes.
  
  
  BACKGROUND
  UMIN000018771.
authors.affiliation: From the Department of Ophthalmology, University of Kitasato School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.
authors.forename: Kimiya
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Shimizu
authors.forename: Kazutaka
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Kamiya
authors.forename: Akihito
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Igarashi
authors.forename: Hidenaga
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Kobashi
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001251:Astigmatism / Q000209:etiology / Q000601:surgery*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D019654:Lens Implantation, Intraocular; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009216:Myopia / Q000150:complications / Q000601:surgery*; D054120:Phakic Intraocular Lenses; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012720:Severity of Illness Index; D013997:Time Factors; D055815:Young Adult