title: Impact of mash feeding versus pellets on propionic/butyric acid levels and on total load in the gastrointestinal tract of growing pigs.
abstract: Feed characteristics may influence the bacterial community composition and metabolic activities in the pig gastrointestinal tract, known to be associated with positive effects on the gut. Use of mash feed is associated with reduced excretion, but little is known of its effect on the population or of the mechanism of action. Our objectives were to assess the effect of feed texture combined with feed particle size on VFA profiles and levels, total count, and the presence of genes encoding virulence factors of pathogenic strains in the digestive tract along with their impact on pig performance of fattening pigs. Pigs ( = 840) on a commercial farm received mash or pellet diets of different particle sizes during the fattening period. Caecal and colon contents from 164 pigs were sampled at the slaughterhouse for enumeration of by quantitative PCR (qPCR) and for VFA quantification by capillary gas chromatography. The gene was used to enumerate total . Improved pig performances associated with pellet texture and a 500-μm size were observed. Caecal ( = 0.02) and colon ( < 0.01) propionic acid concentrations were lower for pigs receiving pellet rather than mash feed. Similarly, caecal ( = 0.01) and colon ( < 0.001) butyric acid concentrations were also lower for pigs receiving pellet rather than mash feed, as determined by capillary gas chromatography. Moreover, caecal ( = 0.03) and colon ( < 0.001) butyric acid concentrations were higher for pigs receiving a feed with a 1,250-μm particle size rather than a 500-μm particle size. On the other hand, total caecal and colon levels were higher for pigs receiving pellet feed than for those receiving mash feed. For total enumeration, caecal ( < 0.01) and colon ( < 0.01) gene copies were higher for pigs receiving pellet rather than mash feed. No effect of particle size on fatty acid concentrations or on numbers was observed. Virulence gene quantification revealed no trend. Taken together, results showed that mash feed is associated with lower growth performance but with favorable intestinal changes linked to VFA levels and reduction in the intestine.
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Longpré
authors.forename: J M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Fairbrother
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Fravalo
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Arsenault
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: LeBel
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Laplante
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Surprenant
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Massé
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Letellier
mesh_terms: D000821:Animal Feed / Q000032:analysis*; D000824:Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena; D000818:Animals; D020148:Butyric Acid / Q000737:chemistry*; D004032:Diet / Q000662:veterinary; D005766:Gastrointestinal Contents / Q000737:chemistry*; D041981:Gastrointestinal Tract / Q000737:chemistry*; D010316:Particle Size; D011422:Propionates / Q000737:chemistry*; D013552:Swine / Q000254:growth & development*
chemical_list: D011422:Propionates; D020148:Butyric Acid; C029658:propionic acid