title: The burden of bowel preparations in patients undergoing elective colonoscopy.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  An adequate bowel preparation is an important quality measure for optimal colonoscopy.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  The aim of this article is to study the burden of bowel preparations by examining seven specific variables (hunger, taste, volume, sleep, social, work, and adverse events (AEs)).
  
  
  METHODS
  Ambulatory patients undergoing elective colonoscopy completed a questionnaire regarding their experience with the prescribed preparation. The seven study variables were graded using a numerical scale of 0-10 (best to worst). A score >6 was considered to indicate a significant impact and used as primary outcome. Patients were also asked to grade in descending order what they perceived as the worst aspect of the preparation.
  
  
  RESULTS
  A total of 216 patients completed the survey. Preparations consisted of split-dose sodium picosulfate (SPS) (n = 49), split-dose 4 l PEG ± menthol (n = 49), full-dose PEG (n = 68), and 2 l split-dose PEG + ascorbic acid (n = 50). Except for work and AEs, all variables were considered to have a negative impact by >20% of patients (range 20.4-34.2). SPS was superior to PEG regimens in taste (4.1% vs. 35.9%) and volume (0% vs. 44.9%) (p < 0.05 for both) but inferior for hunger (30.6% vs. 19.2%; p = 0.09). The addition of menthol to PEG significantly improved taste (22.4% vs. 41.5%; p = 0.02). Sleep disturbances were most common with SPS and least with split-dose PEG (30.6% vs. 17.4%; p < 0.05). Overall, patients ranked volume, taste, and hunger as most burdensome.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The burden of bowel preparation is substantial. An informed personalized choice of preparation may improve adherence, tolerability and colon cleansing.
authors.affiliation: Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
authors.forename: Ala I
authors.initials: AI
authors.lastname: Sharara
authors.affiliation: Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
authors.forename: Zeinab D
authors.initials: ZD
authors.lastname: El Reda
authors.affiliation: Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
authors.forename: Ali H
authors.initials: AH
authors.lastname: Harb
authors.affiliation: Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
authors.forename: Carla G
authors.initials: CG
authors.lastname: Abou Fadel
authors.affiliation: Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
authors.forename: Fayez S
authors.initials: FS
authors.lastname: Sarkis
authors.affiliation: Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
authors.forename: Jean M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Chalhoub
authors.affiliation: Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
authors.forename: Rachel
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Abou Mrad
keywords: Colonoscopy; acceptability; adherence; bowel preparation; quality of life; tolerability