title: A Systematic Assessment of Smartphone Tools for Suicide Prevention.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Suicide is a leading cause of death globally, and there has been a rapid growth in the use of new technologies such as mobile health applications (apps) to help identify and support those at risk. However, it is not known whether these apps are evidence-based, or indeed contain potentially harmful content. This review examines the concordance of features in publicly available apps with current scientific evidence of effective suicide prevention strategies.
  
  
  METHODS
  Apps referring to suicide or deliberate self-harm (DSH) were identified on the Android and iOS app stores. Systematic review methodology was employed to screen and review app content. App features were labelled using a coding scheme that reflected the broad range of evidence-based medical and population-based suicide prevention interventions. Best-practice for suicide prevention was based upon a World Health Organization report and supplemented by other reviews of the literature.
  
  
  RESULTS
  One hundred and twenty-three apps referring to suicide were identified and downloaded for full review, 49 of which were found to contain at least one interactive suicide prevention feature. Most apps focused on obtaining support from friends and family (n = 27) and safety planning (n = 14). Of the different suicide prevention strategies contained within the apps, the strongest evidence in the literature was found for facilitating access to crisis support (n = 13). All reviewed apps contained at least one strategy that was broadly consistent with the evidence base or best-practice guidelines. Apps tended to focus on a single suicide prevention strategy (mean = 1.1), although safety plan apps provided the opportunity to provide a greater number of techniques (mean = 3.9). Potentially harmful content, such as listing lethal access to means or encouraging risky behaviour in a crisis, was also identified.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Many suicide prevention apps are available, some of which provide elements of best practice, but none that provide comprehensive evidence-based support. Apps with potentially harmful content were also identified. Despite the number of apps available, and their varied purposes, there is a clear need to develop useful, pragmatic, and multifaceted mobile resources for this population. Clinicians should be wary in recommending apps, especially as potentially harmful content can be presented as helpful. Currently safety plan apps are the most comprehensive and evidence-informed, for example, "Safety Net" and "Mood-Tools--Depression Aid".
authors.affiliation: Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
authors.forename: Mark Erik
authors.initials: ME
authors.lastname: Larsen
authors.affiliation: Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.|School of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
authors.forename: Jennifer
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Nicholas
authors.affiliation: Black Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
authors.forename: Helen
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Christensen
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D063731:Mobile Applications; D012648:Self Care / Q000379:methods; D000068997:Smartphone; D013405:Suicide / Q000523:psychology; D017216:Telemedicine / Q000379:methods*; D000092864:Suicide Prevention