title: No space left for intravenous thrombolysis in acute stroke: CONS.
abstract: Recent successful clinical trials of endovascular thrombectomy for large artery ischaemic stroke have established the value of this treatment modality as an adjunct to intravenous thrombolysis, not as an alternative: thrombectomy delivery was undertaken in the context of highly efficient networks for acute thrombolysis delivery and the great majority of patients received IV thrombolytic drug treatment. Even for the minority of acute stroke patients for whom thrombectomy is potentially relevant, access will be limited by geography and service infrastructure. Developments in intravenous thrombolysis in the near future will likely produce safer and more effective intravenous treatments. Intravenous thrombolysis will remain the first line of treatment for the great majority of acute stroke patients.
authors.affiliation: Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, University of Glasgow, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, Glasgow, G51 4TF, UK. keith.muir@glasgow.ac.uk.
authors.forename: Keith
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Muir
mesh_terms: D057510:Endovascular Procedures / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards; D005343:Fibrinolytic Agents / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000494:pharmacology / Q000627:therapeutic use; D006801:Humans; D007262:Infusions, Intravenous / Q000592:standards*; D020521:Stroke / Q000188:drug therapy*; D015912:Thrombolytic Therapy / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards; D016896:Treatment Outcome
chemical_list: D005343:Fibrinolytic Agents
keywords: Cerebrovascular disease; Endovascular treatment; Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator; Stroke; Thrombectomy; Thrombolysis