Biomechanical Comparison of Parallel and Crossed Suture Repair for Longitudinal Meniscus Tears.
BACKGROUND
Longitudinal meniscus tears are commonly encountered in clinical practice. Meniscus repair devices have been previously tested and presented; however, prior studies have not evaluated repair construct designs head to head. This study compared a new-generation meniscus repair device, SpeedCinch, with a similar established device, Fast-Fix 360, and a parallel repair construct to a crossed construct. Both devices utilize self-adjusting No. 2-0 ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) and 2 polyether ether ketone (PEEK) anchors.


OBJECTIVE
Crossed suture repair constructs have higher failure loads and stiffness compared with simple parallel constructs. The newer repair device would exhibit similar performance to an established device.


METHODS
Controlled laboratory study.


METHODS
Sutures were placed in an open fashion into the body and posterior horn regions of the medial and lateral menisci in 16 cadaveric knees. Evaluation of 2 repair devices and 2 repair constructs created 4 groups: 2 parallel vertical sutures created with the Fast-Fix 360 (2PFF), 2 crossed vertical sutures created with the Fast-Fix 360 (2XFF), 2 parallel vertical sutures created with the SpeedCinch (2PSC), and 2 crossed vertical sutures created with the SpeedCinch (2XSC). After open placement of the repair construct, each meniscus was explanted and tested to failure on a uniaxial material testing machine. All data were checked for normality of distribution, and 1-way analysis of variance by ranks was chosen to evaluate for statistical significance of maximum failure load and stiffness between groups. Statistical significance was defined as P < .05.


RESULTS
The mean maximum failure loads ± 95% CI (range) were 89.6 ± 16.3 N (125.7-47.8 N) (2PFF), 72.1 ± 11.7 N (103.4-47.6 N) (2XFF), 71.9 ± 15.5 N (109.4-41.3 N) (2PSC), and 79.5 ± 25.4 N (119.1-30.9 N) (2XSC). Interconstruct comparison revealed no statistical difference between all 4 constructs regarding maximum failure loads (P = .49). Stiffness values were also similar, with no statistical difference on comparison (P = .28).


CONCLUSIONS
Both devices in the current study had similar failure load and stiffness when 2 vertical or 2 crossed sutures were tested in cadaveric human menisci.


CONCLUSIONS
Simple parallel vertical sutures perform similarly to crossed suture patterns at the time of implantation.
Andrews Research and Education Foundation, Gulf Breeze, Florida, USA.
Charles
C
Milchteim
Andrews Research and Education Foundation, Gulf Breeze, Florida, USA.
Eric A
EA
Branch
Andrews Research and Education Foundation, Gulf Breeze, Florida, USA.
Ty
T
Maughon
Andrews Research and Education Foundation, Gulf Breeze, Florida, USA.
Jay
J
Hughey
Andrews Research and Education Foundation, Gulf Breeze, Florida, USA.
Adam W
AW
Anz
failure load; longitudinal tear; meniscus; repair