Comparison of the Supreme and the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized controlled trial.
The single-use LMA Supreme (Teleflex, Inc., Wayne, PA, USA) and the LMA ProSeal (Teleflex, Inc., Wayne, PA, USA) laryngeal mask airway (LMA) have similar characteristics. To date, studies have not achieved a consensus regarding the oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) of the LMA Supreme and LMA ProSeal, and there is little information on their efficacy in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This study compared the safety and efficacy of the LMA Supreme and LMA ProSeal devices in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.



Eighty-four eligible consenting patients were randomly allocated to the LMA Supreme group or the LMA ProSeal group. Both groups received the standard anesthesia technique. The Supreme or ProSeal LMA was inserted, the cuff was inflated to 60 cmH2O, and the LMA position was confirmed. Anesthesia was maintained using propofol and 50% oxygen in air. A gastric tube was inserted through the drain tube of the LMA to deflate the stomach, and the first attempt success rate and insertion time were recorded. During surgery, the intra-abdominal pressure was maintained at 12 mmHg. The fiberoptic view of the larynx was determined by passing a flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope. The OLPs, success rate, insertion time, hemodynamic and respiratory parameters, and complications were recorded at different time points.



The mean OLP was significantly lower in the LMA Supreme group than in the LMA ProSeal group (24.9 ± 5.3 cmH2O vs. 28.4 ± 5.8 cmH2O; p < 0.01). The first attempt success rate and ease of insertion grading for LMA were higher in the Supreme group. The insertion time was lower in the Supreme group than in the ProSeal group (p < 0.01). The fiberoptic view was better with the ProSeal LMA. The hemodynamic and ventilatory parameters and postoperative sore throat were comparable in both groups.



The LMA ProSeal has a higher OLP than the LMA Supreme. The success rate of first attempt insertion and ease of insertion were better for the LMA Supreme group and the insertion time was lower in the LMA Supreme group. The Supreme and ProSeal LMAs were both effective for positive pressure ventilation in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Government Medical College and Hospital, Sector 32, Chandigarh, India. Electronic address: lkanand11@gmail.com.
Lakesh K
LK
Anand
Department of Anaesthesiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India.
Nitika
N
Goel
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Government Medical College and Hospital, Sector 32, Chandigarh, India.
Manpreet
M
Singh
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Government Medical College and Hospital, Sector 32, Chandigarh, India.
Dheeraj
D
Kapoor
D017081:Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic; D005336:Fiber Optic Technology; D006801:Humans; D017214:Laryngeal Masks; D010612:Pharyngitis; D011446:Prospective Studies
ProSeal; Supreme; laparoscopic cholecystectomy; laryngeal mask airway; oropharyngeal leak pressure