Trainee caseload correlates with ERCP success rates but not with procedure-related complications: results from a prospective study (the QUASIE cohort).
OBJECTIVE
Endoscopy society guidelines recommend a minimum of 200 cases for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) trainees in order to ensure competency and quality standards. However, there are few data regarding procedure-related complication rates and added risk for patients during this learning process. We aimed to evaluate the correlation between trainee caseload and procedure- and patient-related outcomes in an ERCP training program, and to assess the risk factors for ERCP failure and complications.


METHODS
We conducted a prospective study of all procedures performed in the ERCP training program at Colentina Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania. Relevant data for each procedure (diagnosis, cannulation method, outcome, and complications during the following 30 days) as well as operator experience were documented. Univariable and multivariable analysis of the risk factors for ERCP failure and complications was done by analyzing the procedures completed by expert and trainee endoscopists during the study period.


RESULTS
The analysis included 534 ERCPs performed by 1 expert and 3 supervised trainees during a 12-month period. Technical success rates were comparable in the trainee and expert groups, and no statistically significant difference was found between the two groups with regard to procedure-related complications and mortality. The more experienced trainees had a better chance of successfully completing a procedure (odds ratio of 1.1 for each additional 10 ERCPs performed), but post-ERCP complications were unrelated to individual trainee caseloads on multivariable analysis.


CONCLUSIONS
The ERCP technical success rate increases with trainee experience, reflecting the learning curve of individual operators. However, the complication rates are similar across different levels of operator experience, indicating that ERCPs performed by supervised trainees imply no additional risk for patients.
Gastroenterology Department, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania.
Theodor
T
Voiosu
Gastroenterology Department, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania.
Andreea
A
Bengus
Gastroenterology Department, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania.
Andrei
A
Voiosu
Gastroenterology Department, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania.
Mihai
M
Rimbas
Gastroenterology Department, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania.
Alina
A
Zlate
Gastroenterology Department, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania.
Andrei
A
Haidar
Internal Medicine Department, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania.
Cristian
C
Baicus
Gastroenterology Department, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania.
Bogdan
B
Mateescu