Biological and synthetic mesh use in breast reconstructive surgery: a literature review.
Mesh use in surgical breast reconstruction is becoming increasingly common; however, there is still no consensus on whether synthetic matrices or biological matrices produce the best outcomes. This review analyses these outcomes, namely the differences in aesthetic outcomes, cost, and the rates of the most commonly reported complications.The results indicate that breast reconstruction with a synthetic matrix produces comparable aesthetic outcomes to a biological matrix, with lower costs and complication rates. The individual results for complication rates show that biological matrixes are associated with lower infection rates and slightly lower capsular contracture, but higher haematoma rates, and slightly higher rates of skin necrosis and explantation--although many had post-op radiotherapy.The majority of the studies evaluated used biological matrices, and there are no randomised controlled trials directly comparing the two types of meshes; definite conclusions cannot be drawn from the available evidence. The authors suggest that a randomised controlled trial comparing these outcomes in synthetic and biological matrix use is needed.
Medway Maritime Hospital , Gillingham, Kent, UK. hughloganellis@cantab.net.
Hugh
H
Logan Ellis
King's College London University, London, UK.
Oluwatosin
O
Asaolu
King's College London University, London, UK.
Vivien
V
Nebo
Medway Maritime Hospital , Gillingham, Kent, UK.
Abdul
A
Kasem
D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000601:surgery*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D016462:Mammaplasty / Q000379:methods*; D013526:Surgical Mesh / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*
Aesthetic outcomes; Biological; Breast reconstruction; Complications; Cost; Matrix; Mesh; Synthetic