The effects of flow rate and concentration on nitrobenzene removal in abiotic and biotic zero-valent iron columns.
This study investigated the effects of varying nitrobenzene (NB) loadings via increasing flow rate or influent NB concentration mode on the removal efficiency in zero-valent iron (ZVI) columns sterilized (abiotic) or preloaded with acclimated microorganisms (biotic). It was shown that physical sequestration via adsorption/co-precipitation and reductive transformation of NB to aniline (AN) were the two major mechanisms for the NB removal in both abiotic and biotic ZVI columns. The NB removal efficiency decreased in both columns as the flow rate increased from 0.25 to 1.0mLmin(-1) whereas the AN recovery increased accordingly, with relatively high AN recovery observed at the flow rate of 1.0mLmin(-1). At the constant flow rate of 0.5mLmin(-1), increasing influent NB concentration from 80 to 400μmolL(-1) resulted in decreasing of the overall NB removal efficiency from 79.5 to 48.6% in the abiotic column and from 85.6 to 62.5% in the biotic column. The results also showed that the sequestration capacity and chemical reduction capacity were respectively 72% and 157.6% higher in the biotic column than in the abiotic column at the same tested hydraulic conditions and NB loadings. The optimal flow rates and influent NB concentrations were at 0.5mLmin(-1) and 80μmolL(-1) for the abiotic column and 2.0mLmin-1 and 240μmolL(-1) for the biotic column, respectively. This study indicated that microorganisms not only enhanced overall reduction of NB, but also facilitated NB sequestration within the porous media and that the optimal loading conditions for overall removal, sequestration, and reduction of NB may be different. Optimal operation conditions should be found for preferred sequestration or transformation (or both) of the target contaminants to meet different goals of groundwater remediation with the ZVI-PRB systems.
School of Environment and Energy, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, PR China; The Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Ecosystem Restoration in Industry Clusters, Ministry of Education, PR China; The Key Laboratory of Environmental Protection and Eco-Remediation of Guangdong Regular Higher Education Institutions, PR China; Guangdong Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Solid Waste Treatment and Recycling, PR China; Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej 40, DK-1871 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Weizhao
W
Yin
School of Environment and Energy, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, PR China; The Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Ecosystem Restoration in Industry Clusters, Ministry of Education, PR China; The Key Laboratory of Environmental Protection and Eco-Remediation of Guangdong Regular Higher Education Institutions, PR China; Guangdong Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Solid Waste Treatment and Recycling, PR China. Electronic address: jinhuawu@scut.edu.cn.
Jinhua
J
Wu
School of Environment and Energy, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, PR China; Department of Environmental Sciences, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, United States.
Weilin
W
Huang
School of Natural Resources and Environment, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, PR China.
Yongtao
Y
Li
School of Materials and Energy, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, PR China.
Gangbiao
G
Jiang
D000327:Adsorption; D052918:Environmental Restoration and Remediation / Q000379:methods; D060587:Groundwater; D007501:Iron / Q000737:chemistry; D009578:Nitrobenzenes / Q000032:analysis / Q000737:chemistry*; D014874:Water Pollutants, Chemical / Q000032:analysis / Q000737:chemistry*
D009578:Nitrobenzenes; D014874:Water Pollutants, Chemical; D007501:Iron
Biotic amendment; Nitrobenzene; Permeable reactive barrier; Zero-valent iron