Using systems thinking to support clinical system transformation.
Purpose - The British Columbia Ministry of Health's Clinical Care Management initiative was used as a case study to better understand large-scale change (LSC) within BC's health system. Using a complex system framework, the purpose of this paper is to examine mechanisms that enable and constrain the implementation of clinical guidelines across various clinical settings. Design/methodology/approach - Researchers applied a general model of complex adaptive systems plus two specific conceptual frameworks (realist evaluation and system dynamics mapping) to define and study enablers and constraints. Focus group sessions and interviews with clinicians, executives, managers and board members were validated through an online survey. Findings - The functional themes for managing large-scale clinical change included: creating a context to prepare clinicians for health system transformation initiatives; promoting shared clinical leadership; strengthening knowledge management, strategic communications and opportunities for networking; and clearing pathways through the complexity of a multilevel, dynamic system. Research limitations/implications - The action research methodology was designed to guide continuing improvement of implementation. A sample of initiatives was selected; it was not intended to compare and contrast facilitators and barriers across all initiatives and regions. Similarly, evaluating the results or process of guideline implementation was outside the scope; the methods were designed to enable conversations at multiple levels - policy, management and practice - about how to improve implementation. The study is best seen as a case study of LSC, offering a possible model for replication by others and a tool to shape further dialogue. Practical implications - Recommended action-oriented strategies included engaging local champions; supporting local adaptation for implementation of clinical guidelines; strengthening local teams to guide implementation; reducing change fatigue; ensuring adequate resources; providing consistent communication especially for front-line care providers; and supporting local teams to demonstrate the clinical value of the guidelines to their colleagues. Originality/value - Bringing a complex systems perspective to clinical guideline implementation resulted in a clear understanding of the challenges involved in LSC.
InSource Research Group, Coquitlam, Canada.
Allan
A
Best
InSource Research Group, Coquitlam, Canada.
Alex
A
Berland
InSource Research Group, Coquitlam, Canada.
Carol
C
Herbert
InSource Research Group, Coquitlam, Canada.
Jennifer
J
Bitz
Quality and Healthcare Improvement, BC Patient Safety & Quality Council, Vancouver, Canada.
Marlies W
MW
van Dijk
BC Patient Safety & Quality Council, Vancouver, Canada.
Christina
C
Krause
BC Patient Safety & Quality Council, Vancouver, Canada.
Douglas
D
Cochrane
InSource Research Group, Coquitlam, Canada.
Kevin
K
Noel
BC Patient Safety & Quality Council, Vancouver, Canada.
Julian
J
Marsden
BC Patient Safety & Quality Council, Vancouver, Canada.
Shari
S
McKeown
InSource Research Group, Coquitlam, Canada.
John
J
Millar
D002170:Canada; D003695:Delivery of Health Care; D004059:Diffusion of Innovation; D017144:Focus Groups; D017408:Guidelines as Topic; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D007857:Leadership; D036301:Qualitative Research
Clinical guidelines; Complex adaptive systems; Implementation; Knowledge translation; Large-scale change; Systems thinking