Application of Fast-Track Recovery Protocols in Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Multiport Laparoscopic Surgery for Colon Resection.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study is to analyze whether fast-track (FT) recovery protocols can be applied to single-port laparoscopic surgery for colon resection, as they are in multiport laparoscopic surgery.


METHODS
Retrospective study comparing single-port laparoscopic surgery (SP-FT) versus multiport laparoscopic surgery (MP-FT) for colon resection, and the applicability of our FT recovery protocol in all patients between 2013 and 2014. Variables evaluated were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, tumor size, number of nodes, surgery performed, postoperative morbidity, and length of hospital stay.


RESULTS
A total of 83 patients (28 SP-FT group and 55 MP-FT group) underwent FT recovery. The median age was 62 (11-85) years in SP-FT group and 72 (57-84) in MP-FT group. ASA score showed no significant difference (P = .973). The surgical procedures performed were as follows: SP-FT group 20 right hemicolectomy, 5 left hemicolectomy, and 3 subtotal colectomy and MP-FT group were 26 right hemicolectomy, 28 left hemicolectomy, and 1 subtotal colectomy. Mean operative time (minutes) was shorter in SP-FT group (151 ± 47.9 versus 182 ± 50.7), but no significant difference was observed. Regarding the tumor size (SP-FT 4.2 [2-7] cm versus MP-FT 4 [3-12] cm) and postoperative morbidity Clavien-Dindo ≥2 (SP-FT 10 patients versus MP-FT 20 patients), there were no significant differences (P = .535; P = .383). The median length of hospital stay was statistically significant: SP-FT 4.5 (3-53) days versus MP-FT 7 (4-33) days (P = .005).


CONCLUSIONS
FT rehabilitation is safe and reproducible in single-port laparoscopic surgery for colon pathologies, with postoperative results comparable with conventional laparoscopic surgery.
Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hospital Universitario Mutua Terrassa , Barcelona, Spain .
Fernando
F
Pardo Aranda
Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hospital Universitario Mutua Terrassa , Barcelona, Spain .
Carlos
C
Maristany
Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hospital Universitario Mutua Terrassa , Barcelona, Spain .
Jose Antonio
JA
Pando
Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hospital Universitario Mutua Terrassa , Barcelona, Spain .
Arantxa
A
Muñoz-Duyos
Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hospital Universitario Mutua Terrassa , Barcelona, Spain .
Alberto
A
Navarro
Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hospital Universitario Mutua Terrassa , Barcelona, Spain .
Noelia
N
Puértolas
Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Hospital Universitario Mutua Terrassa , Barcelona, Spain .
Enrique Veloso
EV
Veloso
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D002648:Child; D003082:Colectomy / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods* / Q000534:rehabilitation; D003110:Colonic Neoplasms / Q000601:surgery*; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D010535:Laparoscopy / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods* / Q000534:rehabilitation; D007902:Length of Stay / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D061646:Operative Time; D011182:Postoperative Care / Q000379:methods*; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D055815:Young Adult