Effect of Aging on ERP Components of Cognitive Control.
As people age, their performance on tasks requiring cognitive control often declines. Such a decline is frequently explained as either a general or specific decline in cognitive functioning with age. In the context of hypotheses suggesting a general decline, it is often proposed that processing speed generally declines with age. A further hypothesis is that an age-related compensation mechanism is associated with a specific cognitive decline. One prominent theory is the compensation hypothesis, which proposes that deteriorated functions are compensated for by higher performing functions. In this study, we used event-related potentials (ERPs) in the context of a GO/NOGO task to examine the age-related changes observed during cognitive control in a large group of healthy subjects aged between 18 and 84 years. The main question we attempted to answer was whether we could find neurophysiological support for either a general decline in processing speed or a compensation strategy. The subjects performed a relatively demanding cued GO/NOGO task with similar omissions and reaction times across the five age groups. The ERP waves of cognitive control, such as N2, P3cue and CNV, were decomposed into latent components by means of a blind source separation method. Based on this decomposition, it was possible to more precisely delineate the different neurophysiological and psychological processes involved in cognitive control. These data support the processing speed hypothesis because the latencies of all cognitive control ERP components increased with age, by 8 ms per decade for the early components (<200 ms) and by 20 ms per decade for the late components. At the same time, the compensatory hypothesis of aging was also supported, as the amplitudes of the components localized in posterior brain areas decreased with age, while those localized in the prefrontal cortical areas increased with age in order to maintain performance on this simple task at a relatively stable level.
Norwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheim, Norway; Department of Neuropsychology, Andrzej Frycz-Modrzewski Krakow UniversityKrakow, Poland; Laboratory of Neurobiology of Action Programming, N.P. Bechtereva Institute of the Human Brain, Russian Academy of SciencesSt. Petersburg, Russia.
Juri
J
Kropotov
Laboratory of Neurobiology of Action Programming, N.P. Bechtereva Institute of the Human Brain, Russian Academy of Sciences St. Petersburg, Russia.
Valery
V
Ponomarev
Laboratory of Neurobiology of Action Programming, N.P. Bechtereva Institute of the Human Brain, Russian Academy of Sciences St. Petersburg, Russia.
Ekaterina P
EP
Tereshchenko
Brain and Trauma Foundation Grisons Chur, Switzerland.
Andreas
A
Müller
Department of Psychology, Division of Neuropsychology, University of ZurichChur, Switzerland; International Normal Aging and Plasticity Research Centre (INAPIC) ZurichChur, Switzerland; University Research Priority Program "Dynamics of Healthy Aging", University of ZurichChur, Switzerland.
Lutz
L
Jäncke
aging; blind source separation; cued GO/NOGO paradigm; event-related potentials; human; latent components; proactive cognitive control