title: High visual resolution matters in audiovisual speech perception, but only for some.
abstract: The basis for individual differences in the degree to which visual speech input enhances comprehension of acoustically degraded speech is largely unknown. Previous research indicates that fine facial detail is not critical for visual enhancement when auditory information is available; however, these studies did not examine individual differences in ability to make use of fine facial detail in relation to audiovisual speech perception ability. Here, we compare participants based on their ability to benefit from visual speech information in the presence of an auditory signal degraded with noise, modulating the resolution of the visual signal through low-pass spatial frequency filtering and monitoring gaze behavior. Participants who benefited most from the addition of visual information (high visual gain) were more adversely affected by the removal of high spatial frequency information, compared to participants with low visual gain, for materials with both poor and rich contextual cues (i.e., words and sentences, respectively). Differences as a function of gaze behavior between participants with the highest and lowest visual gains were observed only for words, with participants with the highest visual gain fixating longer on the mouth region. Our results indicate that the individual variance in audiovisual speech in noise performance can be accounted for, in part, by better use of fine facial detail information extracted from the visual signal and increased fixation on mouth regions for short stimuli. Thus, for some, audiovisual speech perception may suffer when the visual input (in addition to the auditory signal) is less than perfect.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Queen's University, Humphrey Hall, 62 Arch St, Kingston, Ontario, Canada, K7L 3N6. aalsius@gmail.com.
authors.forename: Agnès
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Alsius
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Queen's University, Humphrey Hall, 62 Arch St, Kingston, Ontario, Canada, K7L 3N6.
authors.forename: Rachel V
authors.initials: RV
authors.lastname: Wayne
authors.affiliation: Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
authors.forename: Martin
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Paré
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Queen's University, Humphrey Hall, 62 Arch St, Kingston, Ontario, Canada, K7L 3N6.|Centre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
authors.forename: Kevin G
authors.initials: KG
authors.lastname: Munhall
mesh_terms: D000161:Acoustic Stimulation / Q000379:methods*; D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D032882:Comprehension; D003463:Cues; D005260:Female; D005403:Fixation, Ocular; D006801:Humans; D007206:Individuality; D008297:Male; D009622:Noise; D010775:Photic Stimulation / Q000379:methods*; D065855:Spatial Processing; D013067:Speech Perception; D014796:Visual Perception; D055815:Young Adult
keywords: Audiovisual integration; Eye gaze; Spatial frequency; Speech perception; Speechreading skill