title: Interventions to Correct Misinformation About Tobacco Products.
abstract: In 2006, the U.S. District Court held that tobacco companies had "falsely and fraudulently" denied: tobacco causes lung cancer; environmental smoke endangers children's respiratory systems; nicotine is highly addictive; low tar cigarettes were less harmful when they were not; they marketed to children; they manipulated nicotine delivery to enhance addiction; and they concealed and destroyed evidence to prevent accurate public knowledge. The courts required the tobacco companies to repair this misinformation. Several studies evaluated types of corrective statements (CS). We argue that most CS proposed ("simple CS's") will fall prey to "belief echoes" leaving affective remnants of the misinformation untouched while correcting underlying knowledge. Alternative forms for CS ("enhanced CS's") are proposed that include narrative forms, causal linkage, and emotional links to the receiver.
authors.affiliation: Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, U.S.
authors.forename: Joseph N
authors.initials: JN
authors.lastname: Cappella
authors.affiliation: Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, U.S.
authors.forename: Erin
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Maloney
authors.affiliation: Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, U.S.
authors.forename: Yotam
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Ophir
authors.affiliation: Centre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Cancer Council Victoria, Melbourne, Australia.
authors.forename: Emily
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Brennan
keywords: belief echoes; corrective statements; emotion; misinformation; narrative; tobacco