title: Will the S.C.C.'s Decision on Physician-Assisted Death Apply to Persons Suffering from Severe Mental Illness?
abstract: In this article, the authors address the question of whether the Supreme Court of Canada's decision in Carter v. Canada leaves open the possibility that persons with severe, treatment-refractory mental illness may lawfully seek a physician-assisted death. If so, how will health care providers distinguish between suicidal ideation and intent that is a symptom of the pathology of a treatable mental illness, on the one hand; and suicidal ideation and intent that is, perhaps, a capable and thoughtful response to a "grievous and irremediable" condition, on the other hand? Mental illness is the most common risk factor for suicide. If physician-assisted death becomes an accepted practice in mental health care, how will that be reconciled with the well-established impetus in mental health care to prevent suicide? The authors consider the competing ethical values of beneficence and promoting patient autonomy, in the context of the recovery movement in mental health care.
authors.forename: Barbara
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Walker-Renshaw
authors.forename: Margot
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Finley
mesh_terms: D002170:Canada; D006801:Humans; D028642:Persons with Psychiatric Disorders; D017236:Suicide, Assisted / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*