title: Motor learning and cross-limb transfer rely upon distinct neural adaptation processes.
abstract: Performance benefits conferred in the untrained limb after unilateral motor practice are termed cross-limb transfer. Although the effect is robust, the neural mechanisms remain incompletely understood. In this study we used noninvasive brain stimulation to reveal that the neural adaptations that mediate motor learning in the trained limb are distinct from those that underlie cross-limb transfer to the opposite limb. Thirty-six participants practiced a ballistic motor task with their right index finger (150 trials), followed by intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) applied to the trained (contralateral) primary motor cortex (cM1 group), the untrained (ipsilateral) M1 (iM1 group), or the vertex (sham group). After stimulation, another 150 training trials were undertaken. Motor performance and corticospinal excitability were assessed before motor training, pre- and post-iTBS, and after the second training bout. For all groups, training significantly increased performance and excitability of the trained hand, and performance, but not excitability, of the untrained hand, indicating transfer at the level of task performance. The typical facilitatory effect of iTBS on MEPs was reversed for cM1, suggesting homeostatic metaplasticity, and prior performance gains in the trained hand were degraded, suggesting that iTBS interfered with learning. In stark contrast, iM1 iTBS facilitated both performance and excitability for the untrained hand. Importantly, the effects of cM1 and iM1 iTBS on behavior were exclusive to the hand contralateral to stimulation, suggesting that adaptations within the untrained M1 contribute to cross-limb transfer. However, the neural processes that mediate learning in the trained hemisphere vs. transfer in the untrained hemisphere appear distinct.
authors.affiliation: Human Motor Control Laboratory, School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Australia; Sport & Exercise Psychology Unit, Department of Sport Science, University of Rostock, Germany; tino.stoeckel@uni-rostock.de.
authors.forename: Tino
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Stöckel
authors.affiliation: Centre for Sensorimotor Performance, School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia;
authors.forename: Timothy J
authors.initials: TJ
authors.lastname: Carroll
authors.affiliation: Human Motor Control Laboratory, School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Australia; Research Institute for Sports and Exercise Sciences, Faculty of Science, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom; and.
authors.forename: Jeffery J
authors.initials: JJ
authors.lastname: Summers
authors.affiliation: Sensorimotor Neuroscience and Ageing Research Laboratory, School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Australia.
authors.forename: Mark R
authors.initials: MR
authors.lastname: Hinder
mesh_terms: D000222:Adaptation, Physiological / Q000502:physiology*; D000328:Adult; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D004576:Electromyography; D019054:Evoked Potentials, Motor / Q000502:physiology*; D005121:Extremities / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D007839:Functional Laterality; D006801:Humans; D007858:Learning / Q000502:physiology*; D008297:Male; D009044:Motor Cortex / Q000502:physiology*; D011597:Psychomotor Performance; D012044:Regression Analysis; D050781:Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation; D014163:Transfer, Psychology / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
keywords: ballistic motor learning; corticospinal excitability; interlimb transfer; motor performance; noninvasive brain stimulation