title: Federal and Provincial Responsibilities to Implement Physician-Assisted Suicide.
abstract: In the most significant constitutional decision of the last generation, Carter v. Canada, the Supreme Court of Canada reversed itself and decided that it was possible for Parliament to enact safeguards that would be adequate to protect persons who are vulnerable in times of weakness, then proceeded to declare that Canadians were entitled to a s. 7 Charter right to physician-assisted death. David Baker and Gilbert Sharpe accepted the challenge issued by the Court and drafted a Bill to amend the Criminal Code in a manner they believed would strike a constitutional balance between providing access to the right declared by the Court and protecting the vulnerable. This article represents their attempt, along with co-author Rebeka Lauks, to explain many of the key provisions in their draft. Amongst the most noteworthy are their attempts to ensure that those choosing PAD are informed about quality of life, as well as treatment choices; to define vulnerability and to install safeguards adequate to protect persons while vulnerable; and finally a prior review process that would ensure both ready access to the Charter right declared by the Court and consistent and transparent application of the law. The authors have attempted to establish an alternative model to that currently in effect in the Benelux countries, which they regard as having been ineffective in achieving any of these objectives.
authors.forename: David
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Baker
authors.forename: Gilbert
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Sharpe
authors.forename: Rebeka
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Lauks
mesh_terms: D033161:Government Regulation; D006801:Humans; D012941:Social Responsibility; D017236:Suicide, Assisted / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D035862:Vulnerable Populations