title: Novel Luminex Assay for Telomere Repeat Mass Does Not Show Well Position Effects Like qPCR.
abstract: Telomere length is a potential biomarker of aging and risk for age-related diseases. For measurement of relative telomere repeat mass (TRM), qPCR is typically used primarily due to its low cost and low DNA input. But the position of the sample on a plate often impacts the qPCR-based TRM measurement. Recently we developed a novel, probe-based Luminex assay for TRM that requires ~50ng DNA and involves no DNA amplification. Here we report, for the first time, a comparison among TRM measurements obtained from (a) two singleplex qPCR assays (using two different primer sets), (b) a multiplex qPCR assay, and (c) our novel Luminex assay. Our comparison is focused on characterizing the effects of sample positioning on TRM measurement. For qPCR, DNA samples from two individuals (K and F) were placed in 48 wells of a 96-well plate. For each singleplex qPCR assay, we used two plates (one for Telomere and one for Reference gene). For the multiplex qPCR and the Luminex assay, the telomere and the reference genes were assayed from the same well. The coefficient of variation (CV) of the TRM for Luminex (7.2 to 8.4%) was consistently lower than singleplex qPCR (11.4 to 14.9%) and multiplex qPCR (19.7 to 24.3%). In all three qPCR assays the DNA samples in the left- and right-most columns showed significantly lower TRM than the samples towards the center, which was not the case for the Luminex assay (p = 0.83). For singleplex qPCR, 30.5% of the variation in TL was explained by column-to-column variation and 0.82 to 27.9% was explained by sample-to-sample variation. In contrast, only 5.8% of the variation in TRM for the Luminex assay was explained by column-to column variation and 50.4% was explained by sample-to-sample variation. Our novel Luminex assay for TRM had good precision and did not show the well position effects of the sample that were seen in all three of the qPCR assays that were tested.
authors.affiliation: Department of Public Health Sciences, Biological Science Division, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
authors.forename: Muhammad G
authors.identifier: 0000-0001-9784-6958
authors.initials: MG
authors.lastname: Kibriya
authors.affiliation: Department of Public Health Sciences, Biological Science Division, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
authors.forename: Farzana
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Jasmine
authors.affiliation: Department of Public Health Sciences, Biological Science Division, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
authors.forename: Shantanu
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Roy
authors.affiliation: Department of Public Health Sciences, Biological Science Division, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
authors.forename: Habibul
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Ahsan
authors.affiliation: Department of Public Health Sciences, Biological Science Division, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
authors.forename: Brandon L
authors.initials: BL
authors.lastname: Pierce
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D060888:Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards; D012091:Repetitive Sequences, Nucleic Acid; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D016615:Telomere / Q000235:genetics*