title: Ambiguity in Tactile Apparent Motion Perception.
abstract: In von Schiller's Stroboscopic Alternative Motion (SAM) stimulus two visually presented diagonal dot pairs, located on the corners of an imaginary rectangle, alternate with each other and induce either horizontal, vertical or, rarely, rotational motion percepts. SAM motion perception can be described by a psychometric function of the dot aspect ratio ("AR", i.e. the relation between vertical and horizontal dot distances). Further, with equal horizontal and vertical dot distances (AR = 1) perception is biased towards vertical motion. In a series of five experiments, we presented tactile SAM versions and studied the role of AR and of different reference frames for the perception of tactile apparent motion.
  
  
  
  We presented tactile SAM stimuli and varied the ARs, while participants reported the perceived motion directions. Pairs of vibration stimulators were attached to the participants' forearms and stimulator distances were varied within and between forearms. We compared straight and rotated forearm conditions with each other in order to disentangle the roles of exogenous and endogenous reference frames.
  
  
  
  Increasing the tactile SAM's AR biased perception towards vertical motion, but the effect was weak compared to the visual modality. We found no horizontal disambiguation, even for very small tactile ARs. A forearm rotation by 90° kept the vertical bias, even though it was now coupled with small ARs. A 45° rotation condition with crossed forearms, however, evoked a strong horizontal motion bias.
  
  
  
  Existing approaches to explain the visual SAM bias fail to explain the current tactile results. Particularly puzzling is the strong horizontal bias in the crossed-forearm conditions. In the case of tactile apparent motion, there seem to be no fixed priority rule for perceptual disambiguation. Rather the weighting of available evidence seems to depend on the degree of stimulus ambiguity, the current situation and on the perceptual strategy of the individual observer.
authors.affiliation: Institute for Frontier Areas of Psychology and Mental Health, Freiburg, Germany.|Eye Center, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.|Clinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.|Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
authors.forename: Emanuela
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Liaci
authors.affiliation: Eye Center, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.|Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
authors.forename: Michael
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Bach
authors.affiliation: Clinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.|Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
authors.forename: Ludger
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Tebartz van Elst
authors.affiliation: Eye Center, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.|Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
authors.forename: Sven P
authors.initials: SP
authors.lastname: Heinrich
authors.affiliation: Institute for Frontier Areas of Psychology and Mental Health, Freiburg, Germany.|Eye Center, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.|Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
authors.forename: Jürgen
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Kornmeier
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009039:Motion Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D055698:Touch Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult