title: Language and memory for object location.
abstract: In three experiments, we investigated the influence of two types of language on memory for object location: demonstratives (this, that) and possessives (my, your). Participants first read instructions containing demonstratives/possessives to place objects at different locations, and then had to recall those object locations (following object removal). Experiments 1 and 2 tested contrasting predictions of two possible accounts of language on object location memory: the Expectation Model (Coventry, Griffiths, & Hamilton, 2014) and the congruence account (Bonfiglioli, Finocchiaro, Gesierich, Rositani, & Vescovi, 2009). In Experiment 3, the role of attention allocation as a possible mechanism was investigated. Results across all three experiments show striking effects of language on object location memory, with the pattern of data supporting the Expectation Model. In this model, the expected location cued by language and the actual location are concatenated leading to (mis)memory for object location, consistent with models of predictive coding (Bar, 2009; Friston, 2003).
authors.affiliation: University of East Anglia, UK. Electronic address: h.gudde@uea.ac.uk.
authors.forename: Harmen B
authors.initials: HB
authors.lastname: Gudde
authors.affiliation: University of East Anglia, UK. Electronic address: k.coventry@uea.ac.uk.
authors.forename: Kenny R
authors.initials: KR
authors.lastname: Coventry
authors.affiliation: University of East Anglia, UK.
authors.forename: Paul E
authors.initials: PE
authors.lastname: Engelhardt
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention; D003463:Cues; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007802:Language; D008297:Male; D011939:Mental Recall; D008960:Models, Psychological; D013028:Space Perception; D055815:Young Adult
keywords: Memory; Object location; Peripersonal/extrapersonal space; Possessives; Spatial demonstratives