title: Strength Measurements in Acute Hamstring Injuries: Intertester Reliability and Prognostic Value of Handheld Dynamometry.
abstract: Study Design Cohort study, repeated measures. Background Although hamstring strength measurements are used for assessing prognosis and monitoring recovery after hamstring injury, their actual clinical relevance has not been established. Handheld dynamometry (HHD) is a commonly used method of measuring muscle strength. The reliability of HHD has not been determined in athletes with acute hamstring injuries. Objectives To determine the intertester reliability and the prognostic value of hamstring HHD strength measurement in acute hamstring injuries. Methods We measured knee flexion strength with HHD in 75 athletes at 2 visits, at baseline (within 5 days of hamstring injury) and follow-up (5 to 7 days after the baseline measurement). We assessed isometric hamstring strength in 15° and 90° of knee flexion. Reliability analysis testing was performed by 2 testers independently at the follow-up visit. We recorded the time needed to return to play (RTP) up to 6 months following baseline. Results The intraclass correlation coefficients of the strength measurements in injured hamstrings were between 0.75 and 0.83. There was a statistically significant but weak correlation between the time to RTP and the strength deficit at 15° of knee flexion measured at baseline (Spearman r = 0.25, P = .045) and at the follow-up visit (Spearman r = 0.26, P = .034). Up to 7% of the variance in time to RTP is explained by this strength deficit. None of the other strength variables were significantly correlated with time to RTP. Conclusion Hamstring strength can be reliably measured with HHD in athletes with acute hamstring injuries. The prognostic value of strength measurements is limited, as there is only a weak association between the time to RTP and hamstring strength deficit after acute injury. Level of Evidence Prognosis, level 4. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2016;46(8):689-696. Epub 12 May 2016. doi:10.2519/jospt.2016.6363.
authors.forename: Gustaaf
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Reurink
authors.forename: Gert Jan
authors.initials: GJ
authors.lastname: Goudswaard
authors.forename: Maarten H
authors.initials: MH
authors.lastname: Moen
authors.forename: Johannes L
authors.initials: JL
authors.lastname: Tol
authors.forename: Jan A N
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Verhaar
authors.forename: Adam
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Weir
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D056352:Athletes; D015331:Cohort Studies; D005260:Female; D000070633:Hamstring Muscles / Q000293:injuries* / Q000503:physiopathology; D006801:Humans; D007719:Knee Joint / Q000502:physiology*; D007869:Leg Injuries / Q000175:diagnosis; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D053580:Muscle Strength / Q000502:physiology*; D053581:Muscle Strength Dynamometer / Q000592:standards*; D015588:Observer Variation; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D000068958:Return to Sport; D013708:Tendon Injuries / Q000175:diagnosis*; D013997:Time Factors; D055815:Young Adult
keywords: muscle; prognosis; reproducibility; return to play