title: 2016 reflections on the favorable cost-benefit of lung cancer screening.
abstract: This article gives a basic background on the confusing and often politicized topic of cost-benefit analysis in healthcare, using lung cancer screening as a case study. The authors are actuaries who work with the insurance industry, where real-world data is used to produce audited financial figures; other disciplines which work with cost-benefit analysis include those academic disciplines where randomized controlled trials may be perceived as the gold standard of evidence. In recent years, the finance and academic sectors of healthcare have begun to converge, as academic disciplines have come to increasingly appreciate real-world data, and insurers increasingly appreciate classical evidence-based medicine. Nevertheless, the variation of results in cost-benefit analyses for particular treatments can be bewildering to medical experts unfamiliar with real-world healthcare financing.
authors.affiliation: Milliman Inc., One Pennsylvania Plaza, New York, USA.
authors.forename: Bruce
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Pyenson
authors.affiliation: Milliman Inc., One Pennsylvania Plaza, New York, USA.
authors.forename: Gabriela
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Dieguez
keywords: Cost-benefit; actuarial; cost-effectiveness; health economics; lung cancer screening