title: Comparing the performance of FOCE and different expectation-maximization methods in handling complex population physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models.
abstract: For the purpose of population pharmacometric modeling, a variety of mathematic algorithms are implemented in major modeling software packages to facilitate the maximum likelihood modeling, such as FO, FOCE, Laplace, ITS and EM. These methods are all designed to estimate the set of parameters that maximize the joint likelihood of observations in a given problem. While FOCE is still currently the most widely used method in population modeling, EM methods are getting more popular as the current-generation methods of choice because of their robustness with more complex models and sparse data structures. There are several versions of EM method implementation that are available in public modeling software packages. Although there have been several studies and reviews comparing the performance of different methods in handling relatively simple models, there has not been a dedicated study to compare different versions of EM algorithms in solving complex PBPK models. This study took everolimus as a model drug and simulated PK data based on published results. Three most popular EM methods (SAEM, IMP and QRPEM) and FOCE (as a benchmark reference) were evaluated for their estimation accuracy and converging speed when solving models of increased complexity. Both sparse and rich sampling data structure were tested. We concluded that FOCE was superior to EM methods for simple structured models. For more complex models and/ or sparse data, EM methods are much more robust. While the estimation accuracy was very close across EM methods, the general ranking of speed (fastest to slowest) was: QRPEM, IMP and SAEM. IMP gave the most realistic estimation of parameter standard errors, while under- and over- estimation of standard errors were observed in SAEM and QRPEM methods.
authors.affiliation: Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Utah, 295 Chipeta Way, Rm 1S010, Salt Lake City, UT, 84102, USA. xiaoxi.liu@hsc.utah.edu.
authors.forename: Xiaoxi
authors.initials: X
authors.lastname: Liu
authors.affiliation: Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Utah, 295 Chipeta Way, Rm 1S010, Salt Lake City, UT, 84102, USA.
authors.forename: Yuhuan
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Wang
mesh_terms: D000465:Algorithms; D019985:Benchmarking; D003198:Computer Simulation; D000068338:Everolimus / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000493:pharmacokinetics; D006801:Humans; D016013:Likelihood Functions; D008954:Models, Biological; D009928:Organ Specificity; D004364:Pharmaceutical Preparations / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000378:metabolism*; D010599:Pharmacokinetics; D010829:Physiological Phenomena; D014018:Tissue Distribution
chemical_list: D004364:Pharmaceutical Preparations; D000068338:Everolimus
keywords: Algorithm; Everolimus; Expectation-maximization methods; FOCE; Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling; Sparse data