title: Pharmacokinetics of a nanocrystal-containing megestrol acetate formulation: a single-dose, randomized, open-label, 2-part, 2-period crossover study in healthy Korean subjects.
abstract: <u>
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  </u> The conventional suspension of megestrol acetate contains micronized megestrol acetate, which was recently discovered to have a disadvantage of decreasing bioavailability when taken in a fasting state. Since megestrol acetate is taken to increase appetite, this property becomes a discouraging factor. To improve upon this, an advanced formulation was developed using a nanocrystal drug-delivery system. This study was conducted to compare the safety and pharmacokinetic characteristics between the conventional formulation of megestrol acetate and a generic version of the advanced formulation containing nanocrystals. <u>
  
  
  METHODS
  </u> This was a randomized, open-label, 2-period, 2-treatment, crossover, single-dose, 2-part study (part 1 fasting and part 2 fed), conducted in healthy males aged between 20 and 50 years with weight within ± 20% of ideal body weight having no congenital abnormalities or chronic diseases. Different subjects were used in part 1 and part 2, but subjects received a single dose of the reference and test drugs separated by a 14-day washout period. Blood sampling was performed up to 120 hours after dosing using a pre-specified sampling time scheme. Primary pharmacokinetic parameters were C<sub>max</sub> and AUC<sub>last</sub> of the test and reference formulations of megestrol acetate. Bioequivalence evaluation was based on the standard criterion of 80 - 125% for the 90% confidence interval of geometric mean ratios of test to reference drugs calculated for the pharmacokinetic parameters. To monitor adverse events, both subject interviews and physical examinations were done on a regular time basis. <u>
  
  
  RESULTS
  </u> 80 subjects (n = 40 each part) were enrolled, and 79 completed the study. The 90% CIs of the geometric mean ratios of C<sub>max</sub> and AUC<sub>last</sub> were 4.4625 - 5.6018 and 1.3602 - 1.6418, respectively, for part 1, and 0.9793 - 1.1327 and 0.7721 - 0.8431, respectively, for part 2. No significant difference was discovered in the incidence of adverse events (AEs) when test and reference treated groups were compared. <u>
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  </u> Our findings suggest that the test formulation of megestrol-acetate-containing nanocrystals is better absorbed and has higher bioavailability compared to the reference formulation in a fasting state. This should allow for a lower dose and better patient compliance.<br /> <br /> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02446353.
authors.forename: Dong Woo
authors.initials: DW
authors.lastname: Chae
authors.forename: Hankil
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Son
authors.forename: Jinju
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Guk
authors.forename: Changhun
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Park
authors.forename: Kyungsoo
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Park
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D019167:Appetite Stimulants / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000493:pharmacokinetics*; D019540:Area Under Curve; D044466:Asian People; D001682:Biological Availability; D018592:Cross-Over Studies; D016503:Drug Delivery Systems; D016568:Drugs, Generic / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000493:pharmacokinetics*; D005215:Fasting; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D019290:Megestrol Acetate / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000493:pharmacokinetics*; D008875:Middle Aged; D053758:Nanoparticles; D013810:Therapeutic Equivalency; D055815:Young Adult
chemical_list: D019167:Appetite Stimulants; D016568:Drugs, Generic; D019290:Megestrol Acetate