title: Towards a phronetic space for responsible research (and innovation).
abstract: The term Responsible Research and Innovation has recently gained currency, as it has been designated to be a key-term in the European research framework Horizon 2020. At the level of European research policy, Responsible Research and Innovation can be viewed as an attempt to reach a broader vision of research and innovation as a public good. The current academic debate may be fairly enriched by considering the role that phronesis may have for RRI. Specifically, in this paper we argue that the current debate might be fruitfully enriched by making a categorial shift. Such a categorial shift involves moving away from the temptation to interpret responsible research and innovation in a technocratic way towards a more pluralistic vision that is rooted in the idea of phronesis. In the present context phronesis points the attention to the cultivation and nurturement of the researcher's formation as a type of engagement with the actual practice of researching, a practice in which researchers (and other parties concerned) are called to apply judgment and exercise discretion in specific and often unique situations without the re-assuring viewpoint of the technician.
authors.affiliation: Institute of Education, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia. bardone@ut.ee.
authors.forename: Emanuele
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Bardone
authors.affiliation: Institute of Education, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
authors.forename: Marianne
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Lind
mesh_terms: D035843:Biomedical Research / Q000941:ethics*; D032984:Ethics, Research; D005060:Europe; D011050:Policy Making
keywords: Care; Inner goods; Phronesis; Responsibility; Responsible research and innovation; Science governance; Technocratism; Tinkering