title: The Impact of Distraction on Laparoscopic Skills in Veterinary Medical Students.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To investigate the impact of distraction on the performance of a simulator-based laparoscopic task in veterinary students.
  
  
  METHODS
  Prospective, randomized trial.
  
  
  METHODS
  Years 1-4 veterinary students (n=41).
  
  
  METHODS
  Participants repeated a simulated laparoscopic peg transfer task to eliminate any learning effects and were subsequently randomized to receive either a cognitive (double-digit addition questions, n=21) or sensory distraction (dogs barking and anesthesia monitor alerts, n=20). The laparoscopic task scores were compared between baseline and in the presence and absence of each distraction. The number of addition questions attempted, and the number of questions answered correctly in 1 minute were compared between baseline and during a concurrent laparoscopic task.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Baseline laparoscopic task scores were not significantly different between groups (P=.09). Laparoscopic task scores were significantly lower than baseline when performed with the cognitive distraction (P<.001) and significantly higher than baseline when performed with the sensory distraction (P=.005). Participants undergoing cognitive distraction attempted significantly fewer addition questions (P<.001) and answered significantly fewer addition questions correctly (P<.001) when a concurrent laparoscopic task was performed.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Cognitive distraction had a negative impact on the performance of a laparoscopic task in this cohort of veterinary students, whereas sensory distraction had a positive effect.
authors.affiliation: Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
authors.forename: Jessica J
authors.initials: JJ
authors.lastname: Kilkenny
authors.affiliation: Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
authors.forename: Victoria J
authors.initials: VJ
authors.lastname: Mrotz
authors.affiliation: Department of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
authors.forename: Deep K
authors.initials: DK
authors.lastname: Khosa
authors.affiliation: Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
authors.forename: Carolyn L
authors.initials: CL
authors.lastname: Kerr
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgery, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
authors.forename: John D
authors.initials: JD
authors.lastname: Denstedt
authors.affiliation: Department of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
authors.forename: Ameet
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Singh
mesh_terms: D001288:Attention; D002983:Clinical Competence; D003198:Computer Simulation; D010535:Laparoscopy / Q000193:education / Q000662:veterinary*; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011897:Random Allocation; D013334:Students