title: Understanding Decision-Making in Specialized Domestic Violence Courts: Can Contemporary Theoretical Frameworks Help Guide These Decisions?
abstract: This study fills a gap in the literature by exploring the utility of contemporary courtroom theoretical frameworks-uncertainty avoidance, causal attribution, and focal concerns-for explaining decision-making in specialized domestic violence courts. Using data from two specialized domestic violence courts, this study explores the predictors of prosecutorial and judicial decision-making and the extent to which these factors are congruent with theoretical frameworks often used in studies of court processing. Findings suggest that these theoretical frameworks only partially help explain decision-making in the courts under study. A discussion of the findings and implications for future research is provided.
authors.affiliation: 1 University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV, USA.
authors.forename: Gillian M
authors.initials: GM
authors.lastname: Pinchevsky
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D003416:Criminal Law / Q000379:methods*; D003657:Decision Making; D017579:Domestic Violence / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007603:Jurisprudence; D008297:Male; D015144:Southeastern United States
keywords: courtroom decision-making; specialized domestic violence courts; theory