title: Improving outcomes in total knee arthroplasty-do navigation or customized implants have a role?
abstract: Modern total knee arthroplasty is effective at treating the pain and disability associated with osteoarthritis. The number of total knee replacements done in the USA continues to increase. Despite the great care taken during all of these procedures, some patients remain dissatisfied with their outcome. While this dissatisfaction is likely multifactorial, malalignment of the prosthetic components is a major cause of postoperative complications. A neutral mechanical axis plus or minus 3° is felt to have a positive impact on the survivorship of the prosthesis. Conventional instrumentation has been shown to have a significant number of total knee replacements that lie well outside a neutral coronal alignment. With that in mind, significant effort has been placed into the development of technology to improve the overall alignment of the prosthesis. In order to reduce the number of outliers, several companies have developed cost-effective systems to aid the surgeon in achieving a more predictably aligned prosthesis in all three planes. We will review the literature that is available regarding several of these tools to examine if navigation or custom guides improve outcomes in total knee arthroplasty. Our review supports that while both navigation and custom implants guides seem to be a cost effective way to achieve a predictable mechanical alignment of a total knee prosthesis therefore reducing the number of outliers, the cost may be increased operative times with no perceived difference in patient satisfaction with navigation custom guides.
authors.affiliation: Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, USA. mbeal@nm.org.
authors.forename: Matthew D
authors.initials: MD
authors.lastname: Beal
authors.affiliation: Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, USA.
authors.forename: Dimitri
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Delagramaticas
authors.affiliation: Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, USA.
authors.forename: David
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Fitz
mesh_terms: D019645:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee / Q000191:economics / Q000295:instrumentation*; D003365:Costs and Cost Analysis; D006801:Humans; D007720:Knee Prosthesis; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D061646:Operative Time; D020370:Osteoarthritis, Knee / Q000191:economics / Q000601:surgery*; D010347:Patient Care Planning / Q000191:economics; D019990:Perioperative Care / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods; D011474:Prosthesis Design; D025321:Surgery, Computer-Assisted / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed; D016896:Treatment Outcome