title: Energetic-environmental-economic assessment of the biogas system with three utilization pathways: Combined heat and power, biomethane and fuel cell.
abstract: A typical biogas system with three utilization pathways, i.e., biogas upgrading, biogas combined heat and power (CHP), biogas solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) were designed. It was assessed from the viewpoint of energy, environment and economy by using energy efficiency, green degree and net present value index respectively. The assessment considered the trade-off relationships among these indexes, which is more comprehensive than previous systematic evaluation work only included single or two of the pathway(s) by using one or two of the index(es). Assessment results indicated that biogas upgrading pathway has the highest systematic energy efficiency (46.5%) and shortest payback period (8.9year) with the green degree production is the lowest (9.29gd/day). While for biogas SOFC pathway, although the green degree production is the highest (21.77gd/day), the payback period is longer (14.5year) and the energy efficiency is 13.6% lower than the biogas upgrading pathway.
authors.affiliation: Beijing Key Laboratory of Ionic Liquids Clean Process, Key Laboratory of Green Process and Engineering, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
authors.forename: Bin
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Wu
authors.affiliation: Beijing Key Laboratory of Ionic Liquids Clean Process, Key Laboratory of Green Process and Engineering, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China. Electronic address: xpzhang@ipe.ac.cn.
authors.forename: Xiangping
authors.initials: X
authors.lastname: Zhang
authors.affiliation: Beijing Key Laboratory of Ionic Liquids Clean Process, Key Laboratory of Green Process and Engineering, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
authors.forename: Dawei
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Shang
authors.affiliation: Beijing Key Laboratory of Ionic Liquids Clean Process, Key Laboratory of Green Process and Engineering, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China; School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.
authors.forename: Di
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Bao
authors.affiliation: Beijing Key Laboratory of Ionic Liquids Clean Process, Key Laboratory of Green Process and Engineering, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
authors.forename: Suojiang
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Zhang
authors.affiliation: Guangzhou Institute of Energy Conversion, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China.
authors.forename: Tao
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Zheng
mesh_terms: D056804:Biofuels / Q000191:economics*; D001709:Biotechnology; D004777:Environment; D005740:Gases; D006358:Hot Temperature; D008697:Methane / Q000737:chemistry*; D015233:Models, Statistical
chemical_list: D056804:Biofuels; D005740:Gases; D008697:Methane
keywords: Biogas; Combined heat and power; Economic analysis; Energy efficiency; Fuel cell; Green degree