title: Consistent Treatment of Variables and Causation Poses a Challenge for Behavioral Research Methods: A Commentary on Nesselroade and Molenaar (2016).
abstract: Nesselroade and Molenaar presented the ideographic filter as a proposal for analyzing lawful regularities in behavioral research. The proposal highlights an inconsistency that poses a challenge for behavioral research more generally. One can distinguish a broadly Humean approach from a broadly non-Humean approach as they relate to variables and to causation. Nesselroade and Molenaar rejected a Humean approach to latent variables that characterizes them as nothing more than summaries of their manifest indicators. By contrast, they tacitly accepted a Humean approach to causes characterized as nothing more than summaries of their manifest causal effects. A non-Humean treatment of variables coupled with a Humean treatment of causation creates a theoretical tension within their proposal. For example, one can interpret the same model elements as simultaneously representing both variables and causes. Future refinement of the ideographic filter proposal to address this tension could follow any of a number of strategies.
authors.affiliation: a John Jay College of Criminal Justice of The City University of New York.
authors.forename: Keith A
authors.initials: KA
authors.lastname: Markus
mesh_terms: D035841:Behavioral Research; D035843:Biomedical Research; D015984:Causality; D036262:Empirical Research; D005544:Forecasting; D006801:Humans; D015233:Models, Statistical; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D009874:Operations Research; D012106:Research; D012107:Research Design; D012961:Sociology
keywords: Causal inference; causation; explanation; research design