title: Comparison of ocular biometry measurements by applanation and immersion A-scan techniques.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The study compared ocular biometry values using applanation and immersion techniques to determine the most applicable method for our tertiary training centre where personnel with different levels of experience and expertise in biometry take measurements used in calculation of required intraocular lens before cataract surgery.
  
  
  METHODS
  The study was a prospective cross-sectional comparative study of different techniques of ocular biometry from diagnostic equipment (biometry probe 10 MHz Sonomed(®) A-scan (PACSCAN 300A, USA). Measurement variables were obtained among children and adults undergoing cataract surgery. Scleral (Prager) shell was used for the immersion technique followed by the contact technique by the same examiner.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The biometry values of 92 eyes of 92 adult were taken. Their ages ranged from 18 to 95 years with a mean of 64.7 (SD ± 12.9) years. There were 55 (59.8%) males and 37 (40.2%) females, with a male to female ratio of 1.5:1. Average axial length (22.0-24.4 mm) eyes were the most common eyes measured in 75 (81.5%) of the cases. The means of the axial lengths biometry values with immersion and contact technique were 23.66(±1.36) and 23.46 mm (±1.46); the axial length differences was 0.2 ± 0.26 mm (range 0.0-0.94 mm) and statistically significant (95% CI of the Difference 0.15 to 0.26, p = 0.000). The Standard deviation SD (mm) of Individual Eye Axial Length showed a mean of 0.03 ± 0.04 (0.0-0.3) mm for immersion and for contact technique 0.14 ± 0.12(0.0-0.6)mm.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  There was a significant difference in ocular biometry measurement with the contact and immersion ultrasound techniques. The immersion technique had better repeatability, thus it is ideal in a training hospital setting in a typical in sub-Saharan Africa who have limited resources to employ a dedicated person to do biometry; and where the different operators of A-scan machines have different levels of experience and expertise.
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiology, University of Ilorin, Nigeria; Department of Ophthalmology, University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, Nigeria.
authors.forename: Dupe S
authors.initials: DS
authors.lastname: Ademola-Popoola
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiology, University of Ilorin, Nigeria.
authors.forename: Donald A
authors.initials: DA
authors.lastname: Nzeh
authors.affiliation: Department of Ophthalmology, University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, Nigeria.
authors.forename: Sadiat E
authors.initials: SE
authors.lastname: Saka
authors.affiliation: Department of Ophthalmology, University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, Nigeria.
authors.forename: Lateefat B
authors.initials: LB
authors.lastname: Olokoba
authors.affiliation: Department of Ophthalmology, University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, Nigeria.
authors.forename: Tokunbo S
authors.initials: TS
authors.lastname: Obajolowo
keywords: Adults; Applanation; Immersion; Ocular biometry; Techniques; Training