title: [Newborn Hearing Screening and Subsequent Diagnostic Evaluation: Analysis and Outcomes of 6,063 Infants Born in a Community Hospital].
abstract: A retrospective study was conducted to examine the implementation status of newborn hearing screening (NHS) of 6,063 infants born in a single community hospital in Japan between 2005 and 2013. An automated auditory brainstem response device was used for NHS and an auditory brainstem response was mainly used for further diagnostic evaluation. Although the participation rate in the NHS was 88.8% in 2013, increasing year by year, it failed to reach 100% probably because NHS is a charged option under the current Japanese healthcare system. Among 40 (0.66%) infants who finally failed their NHS, 34 were referred for subsequent diagnostic evaluation and the remaining 6 were lost to follow-up. Thirty-one of these 34 were diagnosed as having hearing impairment and 3 (0.05%) were identified as having normal hearing, which is considered as a false positive. Both the final referral rate and the hearing impairment rate were significantly higher in the high-risk than in the low-risk group. Compared to the previous national report, the rate of bilateral hearing impairment (0.33%) was significantly higher in this study. Ten (38.5%) out of 26 in the high-risk group were most often diagnosed with otitis media with effusion (OME), while 4 (50%) out of 8 in the low-risk group were diagnosed as having sensorineural hearing loss. Seven (35%) out of 20 with bilateral hearing impairment attained a normal hearing level at a median age of 18 months. Although the primary aim of NHS is early detection of congenital permanent hearing loss, OME is observed commonly in NHS-failed infants. It is therefore important to examine the middle ear status carefully as part of the diagnostic evaluation. Thirty-four infants underwent further diagnostic evaluation at a median age of 46 days, and hearing aids were given in 10 of them at a median age of 5.6 months without delay. Because high-risk patients often tend to be lost to follow-up, otolaryngologists have to give a detailed explanation to caregivers and to build a solid support system for children with hearing impairment.
authors.forename: Yasuko
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Tanaka
authors.forename: Hiroyuki
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Enomoto
authors.forename: Kentaro
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Takada
authors.forename: Maki
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Inoue
authors.forename: Noboru
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Ogawara
authors.forename: Masahiro
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Takahashi
authors.forename: Nobuhiko
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Oridate
mesh_terms: D002675:Child, Preschool; D005260:Female; D006311:Hearing Disorders / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000628:therapy; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D008297:Male; D015997:Neonatal Screening; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012307:Risk Factors; D016896:Treatment Outcome