title: Does positron emission tomography/computed tomography aid the diagnosis of prosthetic valve infective endocarditis?
abstract: A best evidence topic was constructed according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) aids the diagnosis of prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE)? A total of 107 publications were found using the reported search, of which 6 represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. The reported outcome of all studies was a final diagnosis of confirmed endocarditis on follow-up. All the six studies were non-randomized, single-centre, observational studies and thus represented level 3 evidence. The diagnostic capability of PET/CT for PVE was compared with that of the modified Duke Criteria and echocardiography, and reported in terms of sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values. All studies demonstrated an increased sensitivity for the diagnosis of PVE when PET/CT was combined with the modified Duke Criteria on admission. A higher SUVmax on PET was found to be significantly associated with a confirmed diagnosis of endocarditis and an additional diagnostic benefit of PET/CT angiography over conventional PET/non-enhanced CT is reported due to improved anatomical resolution. However, PET/CT was found to be unreliable in the early postoperative period due to its inability to distinguish between infection and residual postoperative inflammatory changes. PET/CT was also found to be poor at diagnosing cases of native valve endocarditis. We conclude that PET/CT aids in the diagnosis of PVE when combined with the modified Duke Criteria on admission by increasing the diagnostic sensitivity. The diagnostic ability of PET/CT can be potentiated by the use of PET/CTA; however, its use may be unreliable in the early postoperative period or in native valve endocarditis.
authors.affiliation: Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK damiancharles.balmforth@bartshealth.nhs.uk.
authors.forename: Damian
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Balmforth
authors.affiliation: Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK.
authors.forename: Jacob
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Chacko
authors.affiliation: Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK.
authors.forename: Rakesh
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Uppal
mesh_terms: D001021:Aortic Valve / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000601:surgery*; D004696:Endocarditis / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000209:etiology; D006349:Heart Valve Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000601:surgery*; D006350:Heart Valve Prosthesis / Q000009:adverse effects*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D000072078:Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography / Q000379:methods*; D011475:Prosthesis Failure; D016459:Prosthesis-Related Infections / Q000150:complications / Q000175:diagnosis*; D015203:Reproducibility of Results
keywords: Infective endocarditis; Positron emission tomography/computed tomography; Valve surgery