title: How to report professional practice in nursing? A scoping review.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Nursing professional practice in different contexts of care has been widely described in evidence-based literature. Currently, there is no consensus on a common structure for these descriptions. Understanding and comparing similar practices is made difficult by the varying nature of descriptions provided in scientific literature.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  1) to report research methods found in the scientific literature that were used to describe the practice of different health professionals; 2) to report on the main concepts used to describe the practice of these health professionals; 3) to propose a structure for the description of the practice in nursing.
  
  
  METHODS
  A scoping review following a five-stage approach: 1) identifying the research question; 2) identifying relevant studies; 3) selecting studies; 4) charting data; 5) reporting results. The Medline, CINAHL, psychARTICLES, psyCRITIQUES, psycEXTRA, Psychology and Behavioral Science Collection and psycINFO databases were searched. Each study was analyzed and extracted data were classified by categories and structures used to describe the health professional practices.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Forty-nine studies were included. In these studies, quantitative, qualitative or mixed methods were used to describe professional practice in different health disciplines. Three major concepts were reported most frequently in describing professional practice: roles, domains and activities. The concepts varied greatly among authors. We found that to define roles or to characterize a professional practice, activities must be described and organized on the basis of different domains.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  A promising structure for describing nursing professional practice is proposed by the authors of this review. The structure facilitates the accurate description of all domains and activities performed by nurses in different contexts of practice, and will contribute to the development of knowledge about nursing practice in different contexts based on shared concepts.
authors.affiliation: Faculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
authors.forename: Marie-Eve
authors.initials: ME
authors.lastname: Poitras
authors.affiliation: Département des sciences de la santé, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, Québec, Canada.
authors.forename: Maud-Christine
authors.initials: MC
authors.lastname: Chouinard
authors.affiliation: Faculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada ; Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux du Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean, Hôpital de Chicoutimi, 305, Saint-Vallier, Chicoutimi, G7H 5H6 Québec Canada.
authors.forename: Martin
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Fortin
authors.affiliation: Faculté de médecine et des sciences de la santé, Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada.
authors.forename: Frances
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Gallagher
keywords: Activity; Domain; Nursing; Professional practice; Role; Scoping review; Structure