One registration multi-atlas-based pseudo-CT generation for attenuation correction in PET/MRI.
OBJECTIVE
The outcome of a detailed assessment of various strategies for atlas-based whole-body bone segmentation from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was exploited to select the optimal parameters and setting, with the aim of proposing a novel one-registration multi-atlas (ORMA) pseudo-CT generation approach.


METHODS
The proposed approach consists of only one online registration between the target and reference images, regardless of the number of atlas images (N), while for the remaining atlas images, the pre-computed transformation matrices to the reference image are used to align them to the target image. The performance characteristics of the proposed method were evaluated and compared with conventional atlas-based attenuation map generation strategies (direct registration of the entire atlas images followed by voxel-wise weighting (VWW) and arithmetic averaging atlas fusion). To this end, four different positron emission tomography (PET) attenuation maps were generated via arithmetic averaging and VWW scheme using both direct registration and ORMA approaches as well as the 3-class attenuation map obtained from the Philips Ingenuity TF PET/MRI scanner commonly used in the clinical setting. The evaluation was performed based on the accuracy of extracted whole-body bones by the different attenuation maps and by quantitative analysis of resulting PET images compared to CT-based attenuation-corrected PET images serving as reference.


RESULTS
The comparison of validation metrics regarding the accuracy of extracted bone using the different techniques demonstrated the superiority of the VWW atlas fusion algorithm achieving a Dice similarity measure of 0.82 ± 0.04 compared to arithmetic averaging atlas fusion (0.60 ± 0.02), which uses conventional direct registration. Application of the ORMA approach modestly compromised the accuracy, yielding a Dice similarity measure of 0.76 ± 0.05 for ORMA-VWW and 0.55 ± 0.03 for ORMA-averaging. The results of quantitative PET analysis followed the same trend with less significant differences in terms of SUV bias, whereas massive improvements were observed compared to PET images corrected for attenuation using the 3-class attenuation map. The maximum absolute bias achieved by VWW and VWW-ORMA methods was 06.4 ± 5.5 in the lung and 07.9 ± 4.8 in the bone, respectively.


CONCLUSIONS
The proposed algorithm is capable of generating decent attenuation maps. The quantitative analysis revealed a good correlation between PET images corrected for attenuation using the proposed pseudo-CT generation approach and the corresponding CT images. The computational time is reduced by a factor of 1/N at the expense of a modest decrease in quantitative accuracy, thus allowing us to achieve a reasonable compromise between computing time and quantitative performance.
Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospital, CH-1211, Geneva 4, Switzerland.
Hossein
H
Arabi
Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospital, CH-1211, Geneva 4, Switzerland. habib.zaidi@hcuge.ch.|Geneva Neuroscience Center, Geneva University, CH-1205, Geneva, Switzerland. habib.zaidi@hcuge.ch.|Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9700 RB, Groningen, Netherlands. habib.zaidi@hcuge.ch.|Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, DK-500, Odense, Denmark. habib.zaidi@hcuge.ch.
Habib
H
Zaidi
D000368:Aged; D000465:Algorithms; D016477:Artifacts; D001842:Bone and Bones / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007089:Image Enhancement / Q000379:methods; D007090:Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000379:methods*; D008297:Male; D064847:Multimodal Imaging / Q000379:methods; D010363:Pattern Recognition, Automated / Q000379:methods; D049268:Positron-Emission Tomography / Q000379:methods*; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D013382:Subtraction Technique; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Q000379:methods*; D051598:Whole Body Imaging / Q000379:methods
Atlas; Attenuation correction; Attenuation map; Hybrid imaging; PET/MRI