Innovative Medical Technology, Health Technology Assessment, and Health Policy: The Case of Remote Patient Monitoring of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices in South Korea.
In many developed countries with universal coverage healthcare systems, payers require new medical technologies to be assessed as safe, effective, and cost-effective through health technology assessment (HTA) before approval for reimbursement coverage and market access. However, in some cases, HTA is not the sole criterion for decision-making and other factors override the evidence. Remote patient monitoring (RPM) for cardiac implantable electronic devices, a novel technology recognized as safe, effective, and cost-effective, and the standard of care in many countries, is prohibited in South Korea. This peculiar situation is apparently due to deficiencies in healthcare policy and the delivery system and also to poor engagement between stakeholders. We propose that a higher level of engagement and trust between stakeholders needs to be developed, and healthcare providers should be involved in the early development of health policy, so that unnecessary barriers to access to useful medical technology are corrected, thereby allowing Koreans to enjoy the benefits available in other developed countries.
1 Seoul School of Integrated Sciences & Technologies , Seoul, South Korea .
Sang-Soo
SS
Lee
2 Principal, Value-Based Access Pty Ltd , Sydney, Australia .
Eugene
E
Salole
D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D017147:Defibrillators, Implantable; D006291:Health Policy; D006801:Humans; D018670:Monitoring, Ambulatory / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods*; D010138:Pacemaker, Artificial; D058998:Remote Sensing Technology / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods*; D056910:Republic of Korea; D013673:Technology Assessment, Biomedical
policy; technology; telehealth; telemedicine