Human Rights Discourse in the Sustainable Development Agenda Avoids Obligations and Entitlements Comment on "Rights Language in the Sustainable Development Agenda: Has Right to Health Discourse and Norms Shaped Health Goals?".
Our commentary on Forman et al paper explores their thesis that right to health language can frame global health policy responses. We examined human rights discourse in the outcome documents from three 2015 United Nations (UN) summits and found rights-related terms are used in all three. However, a deeper examination of the discourse finds the documents do not convey the obligations and entitlements of human rights and international human rights law. The documents contain little that can be used to empower the participation of those already left behind and to hold States and the private sector to account for their human rights duties. This is especially worrying in a neoliberal era.
Francois-Xavier Bagnoud (FXB), Center for Health and Human Rights, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA.|School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Carmel
C
Williams
Department of Public Health, University of Otago Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
Alison
A
Blaiklock
D003247:Conservation of Natural Resources; D014943:Global Health; D006040:Goals; D006262:Health; D006291:Health Policy; D006806:Human Rights / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D006801:Humans; D007391:International Cooperation; D007802:Language; D014480:United Nations
Climate Change; Discourse Analysis; Human Rights; International Human Rights Law; Neoliberalism; Right to Health; Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)