Selective toxin effects on faster and slower growing individuals in the formation of hormesis at the population level - A case study with Lactuca sativa and PCIB.
Natural plant populations have large phenotypic plasticity that enhances acclimation to local stress factors such as toxin exposures. While consequences of high toxin exposures are well addressed, effects of low-dose toxin exposures on plant populations are seldom investigated. In particular, the importance of 'selective low-dose toxicity' and hormesis, i.e. stimulatory effects, has not been studied simultaneously. Since selective toxicity can change the size distribution of populations, we assumed that hormesis alters the size distribution at the population level, and investigated whether and how these two low-dose phenomena coexist. The study was conducted with Lactuca sativa L. exposed to the auxin-inhibitor 2-(p-chlorophenoxy)-2-methylpropionic acid (PCIB) in vitro. In two separate experiments, L. sativa was exposed to 12 PCIB doses in 24 replicates (50 plants/replicate). Shoot/root growth responses at the population level were compared to the fast-growing (≥90% percentile) and the slow-growing subpopulations (≤10% percentile) by Mann-Whitney U testing and dose-response modelling. In the formation of pronounced PCIB hormesis at the population level, low-dose effects proved selective, but widely stimulatory which seems to counteract low-dose selective toxicity. The selectivity of hormesis was dose- and growth rate-dependent. Stimulation occurred at lower concentrations and stimulation percentage was higher among slow-growing individuals, but partly or entirely masked at the population level by moderate or negligible stimulation among the faster growing individuals. We conclude that the hormetic effect up to the maximum stimulation may be primarily facilitated by an increase in size of the most slow-growing individuals, while thereafter it seems that mainly the fast-growing individuals contributed to the observed hormesis at the population level. As size distribution within a population is related to survival, our study hints that selective effects on slow- and fast-growing individuals may change population dynamics, providing that similar effects can be repeated under field conditions.
University of Hohenheim, Hans-Ruthenberg Institute, Agroecology Unit, Garbenstraße 13, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany. Electronic address: regina.belz@uni-hohenheim.de.
Regina G
RG
Belz
University of Helsinki, Department of Environmental Sciences, Environmental Ecology Unit, Niemenkatu 73, 15140 Lahti, Finland. Electronic address: aki.sinkkonen@helsinki.fi.
Aki
A
Sinkkonen
D004785:Environmental Pollutants / Q000633:toxicity*; D059165:Hormesis / Q000187:drug effects*; D007210:Indoleacetic Acids / Q000037:antagonists & inhibitors*; D018545:Lactuca / Q000187:drug effects* / Q000254:growth & development; D018517:Plant Roots / Q000187:drug effects / Q000254:growth & development; D018520:Plant Shoots / Q000187:drug effects / Q000254:growth & development; D011897:Random Allocation
D004785:Environmental Pollutants; D007210:Indoleacetic Acids
Biphasic; Dose-response; Low toxin doses; Seedling growth; Selective toxicity; Size inequality