Proposition of a Classification of Adult Patients with Hemiparesis in Chronic Phase.
BACKGROUND
Patients who have developed hemiparesis as a result of a central nervous system lesion, often experience reduced walking capacity and worse gait quality. Although clinically, similar gait patterns have been observed, presently, no clinically driven classification has been validated to group these patients' gait abnormalities at the level of the hip, knee and ankle joints. This study has thus intended to put forward a new gait classification for adult patients with hemiparesis in chronic phase, and to validate its discriminatory capacity.


RESULTS
Twenty-six patients with hemiparesis were included in this observational study. Following a clinical examination, a clinical gait analysis, complemented by a video analysis, was performed whereby participants were requested to walk spontaneously on a 10m walkway. A patient's classification was established from clinical examination data and video analysis. This classification was made up of three groups, including two sub-groups, defined with key abnormalities observed whilst walking. Statistical analysis was achieved on the basis of 25 parameters resulting from the clinical gait analysis in order to assess the discriminatory characteristic of the classification as displayed by the walking speed and kinematic parameters. Results revealed that the parameters related to the discriminant criteria of the proposed classification were all significantly different between groups and subgroups. More generally, nearly two thirds of the 25 parameters showed significant differences (p<0.05) between the groups and sub-groups. However, prior to being fully validated, this classification must still be tested on a larger number of patients, and the repeatability of inter-operator measures must be assessed.


CONCLUSIONS
This classification enables patients to be grouped on the basis of key abnormalities observed whilst walking and has the advantage of being able to be used in clinical routines without necessitating complex apparatus. In the midterm, this classification may allow a decision-tree of therapies to be developed on the basis of the group in which the patient has been categorised.
CNRFR - Rehazenter, Laboratoire d'Analyse du Mouvement et de la Posture, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Frédéric
F
Chantraine
CNRFR - Rehazenter, Laboratoire d'Analyse du Mouvement et de la Posture, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Paul
P
Filipetti
CNRFR - Rehazenter, Laboratoire d'Analyse du Mouvement et de la Posture, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Céline
C
Schreiber
CNRFR - Rehazenter, Laboratoire d'Analyse du Mouvement et de la Posture, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Angélique
A
Remacle
CNRFR - Rehazenter, Laboratoire d'Analyse du Mouvement et de la Posture, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Elisabeth
E
Kolanowski
CNRFR - Rehazenter, Laboratoire d'Analyse du Mouvement et de la Posture, Luxembourg, Luxembourg.
Florent
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6479-1911
F
Moissenet
D000328:Adult; D005260:Female; D020233:Gait Disorders, Neurologic / Q000209:etiology / Q000503:physiopathology*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010291:Paresis / Q000145:classification* / Q000503:physiopathology; D014741:Video Recording; D000070857:Walk Test; D016138:Walking