Multiple-stage decisions in a marine central-place forager.
Air-breathing marine animals face a complex set of physical challenges associated with diving that affect the decisions of how to optimize feeding. Baleen whales (Mysticeti) have evolved bulk-filter feeding mechanisms to efficiently feed on dense prey patches. Baleen whales are central place foragers where oxygen at the surface represents the central place and depth acts as the distance to prey. Although hypothesized that baleen whales will target the densest prey patches anywhere in the water column, how depth and density interact to influence foraging behaviour is poorly understood. We used multi-sensor archival tags and active acoustics to quantify Antarctic humpback whale foraging behaviour relative to prey. Our analyses reveal multi-stage foraging decisions driven by both krill depth and density. During daylight hours when whales did not feed, krill were found in deep high-density patches. As krill migrated vertically into larger and less dense patches near the surface, whales began to forage. During foraging bouts, we found that feeding rates (number of feeding lunges per hour) were greatest when prey was shallowest, and feeding rates decreased with increasing dive depth. This strategy is consistent with previous models of how air-breathing diving animals optimize foraging efficiency. Thus, humpback whales forage mainly when prey is more broadly distributed and shallower, presumably to minimize diving and searching costs and to increase feeding rates overall and thus foraging efficiency. Using direct measurements of feeding behaviour from animal-borne tags and prey availability from echosounders, our study demonstrates a multi-stage foraging process in a central place forager that we suggest acts to optimize overall efficiency by maximizing net energy gain over time. These data reveal a previously unrecognized level of complexity in predator-prey interactions and underscores the need to simultaneously measure prey distribution in marine central place forager studies.
Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Marine Mammal Institute, Hatfield Marine Science Center , Oregon State University , Newport, OR , USA.
Ari S
AS
Friedlaender
Division of Marine Science and Conservation , Duke University Marine Laboratory , Beaufort, NC , USA.
David W
DW
Johnston
Division of Marine Science and Conservation , Duke University Marine Laboratory , Beaufort, NC , USA.
Reny B
RB
Tyson
Savannah State University , Savannah, GA , USA.
Amanda
A
Kaltenberg
Hopkins Marine Station, Department of Biology , Stanford University , Pacific Grove, CA , USA.
Jeremy A
JA
Goldbogen
Moss Landing Marine Laboratory , Moss Landing, CA , USA.
Alison K
AK
Stimpert
Division of Marine Science and Conservation , Duke University Marine Laboratory , Beaufort, NC , USA.
Corrie
C
Curtice
NOAA Environmental Research Division , Monterey, CA , USA.
Elliott L
EL
Hazen
Division of Marine Science and Conservation , Duke University Marine Laboratory , Beaufort, NC , USA.
Patrick N
PN
Halpin
Division of Marine Science and Conservation , Duke University Marine Laboratory , Beaufort, NC , USA.
Andrew J
AJ
Read
Division of Marine Science and Conservation , Duke University Marine Laboratory , Beaufort, NC , USA.
Douglas P
DP
Nowacek
diving; foraging decisions; predator–prey interactions