Genomic prediction of crossbred performance based on purebred Landrace and Yorkshire data using a dominance model.
In pig breeding, selection is usually carried out in purebred populations, although the final goal is to improve crossbred performance. Genomic selection can be used to select purebred parental lines for crossbred performance. Dominance is the likely genetic basis of heterosis and explicitly including dominance in the genomic selection model may be an advantage when selecting purebreds for crossbred performance. Our objectives were two-fold: (1) to compare the predictive ability of genomic prediction models with additive or additive plus dominance effects, when the validation criterion is crossbred performance; and (2) to compare the use of two pure line reference populations to a single combined reference population.



We used data on litter size in the first parity from two pure pig lines (Landrace and Yorkshire) and their reciprocal crosses. Training was performed (1) separately on pure Landrace (2085) and Yorkshire (2145) sows and (2) the two combined pure lines (4230), which were genotyped for 38 k single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Prediction accuracy was measured as the correlation between genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) of pure line boars and mean corrected crossbred-progeny performance, divided by the average accuracy of mean-progeny performance. We evaluated a model with additive effects only (MA) and a model with both additive and dominance effects (MAD). Two types of GEBV were computed: GEBV for purebred performance (GEBV) based on either the MA or MAD models, and GEBV for crossbred performance (GEBV-C) based on the MAD. GEBV-C were calculated based on SNP allele frequencies of genotyped animals in the opposite line.



Compared to MA, MAD improved prediction accuracy for both lines. For MAD, GEBV-C improved prediction accuracy compared to GEBV. For Landrace (Yorkshire) boars, prediction accuracies were equal to 0.11 (0.32) for GEBV based on MA, and 0.13 (0.34) and 0.14 (0.36) for GEBV and GEBV-C based on MAD, respectively. Combining animals from both lines into a single reference population yielded higher accuracies than training on each pure line separately. In conclusion, the use of a dominance model increased the accuracy of genomic predictions of crossbred performance based on purebred data.
Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Tjele, 8830, Denmark. hadi.esfandyari@mbg.au.dk.|Animal Breeding and Genomics Centre, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands. hadi.esfandyari@mbg.au.dk.
Hadi
H
Esfandyari
Animal Breeding and Genomics Centre, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Piter
P
Bijma
Danish Pig Research Centre, Seges, Axeltorv 3, 1609, Copenhagen V, Denmark.|School of Animal Biology, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia.
Mark
M
Henryon
Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Tjele, 8830, Denmark.
Ole Fredslund
OF
Christensen
Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Center for Quantitative Genetics and Genomics, Aarhus University, Tjele, 8830, Denmark.
Anders Christian
AC
Sørensen
D000818:Animals; D001947:Breeding; D003433:Crosses, Genetic; D005260:Female; D005787:Gene Frequency; D023281:Genomics; D005838:Genotype; D016014:Linear Models; D008297:Male; D008957:Models, Genetic; D010641:Phenotype; D020641:Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; D034421:Sus scrofa / Q000235:genetics*