To publish and perish: A Faustian bargain or a Hobson's choice.
As a matter of career choice, doctors have to choose between becoming an 'academic' or a 'practitioner.' To conduct research and publish articles in scientific journals is compulsory for the academic professional and mostly optional for the latter. The Medical Council of India has revised the eligibility qualifications for medical teachers over the past decade, and has now come out with regulations for streamlining the process of promotion by focusing on scientific papers, apart from clarifying on required experience and qualifications. 'Predatory publishers' are proliferating across the world, exploiting the reach of the Internet, and are enticing naïve professionals to publish their research work with them. The pitfalls of paid publishing in such journals may tarnish upcoming careers if doctors are not cautious. For a price, there are many publishers who will process articles without even rudimentary peer review; and for the sake of padding up of the resume, this Faustian bargain may eventually prove detrimental to authors, and thus with their professional credibility at stake, may prove to be a Hobson's choice. It is suggested for authors to make a wise choice and a correct decision when selecting a journal to submit their manuscripts.
Associate Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune 411040, India.
M P
MP
Cariappa
Executive Editor, Medical Journal Armed Forces India, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune 411040, India; Associate Professor, Department of Paediatrics, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune 411040, India.
S S
SS
Dalal
Associate Professor, Department of Psychiatry, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune 411040, India.
Kaushik
K
Chatterjee
Eligibility qualification; Medical teachership; Predatory publishing