Performance profile of NCAA Division I men's basketball games and training sessions.
This study aimed to analyse live and stoppage time phases, their ratio, and action played on half and full court in college basketball games. Differences were assessed for the entire games and between halves. Moreover, differences of the live/stoppage time ratio were analysed between games and game-based conditioning drills. Ten games as well as fifteen defensive, fourteen offensive and six scrimmage-type drills of the same division I men's college team (13 players) were analysed using time-motion analysis technique. Live and stoppage time were classified in five classes of duration: 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, >80 seconds. Half court actions started and finished in the same half court. Full court actions were classified as transfer (TR) phases when at least 3 teammates crossed the mid-court line. TR phases were then classified in 5 classes of frequency: 1TR, 2TR, 3TR, 4TR, and >4TR. The results revealed no statistically significant differences between games or between halves for the considered parameters. The only significant difference was observed for live/stoppage time ratio between halves (p<0.001). Furthermore, a significant difference of the live/stoppage ratio was found between games and game-based drills (p<0.01). Post-hoc analysis demonstrated significant differences of scrimmage-type drills in comparison to games, and defensive and offensive drills (p<0.05), whereas no differences emerged for the other pairwise comparisons. The absence of differences between games in the analysed parameters might be important to characterize the model of performance in division I men's college games. Furthermore, these results encourage coaches to use game-based conditioning drills to replicate the LT/ST ratio documented during games.
Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome Foro Italico, Rome, Italy; Department of Biology, University of Portland, Portland, OR.
D
D
Conte
Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome Foro Italico, Rome, Italy.
A
A
Tessitore
Department of Biology, University of Portland, Portland, OR.
K
K
Smiley
Department of Biology, University of Portland, Portland, OR.
C
C
Thomas
Department of Biology, University of Portland, Portland, OR.
T G
TG
Favero
Game performance; Game-based conditioning; Live/stoppage time ratio; Match analysis; Small-sided games