Evaluation of RPE-Select: A Web-Based Respiratory Protective Equipment Selector Tool.
This article describes the evaluation of an open-access web-based respiratory protective equipment selector tool (RPE-Select, accessible at http://www.healthyworkinglives.com/rpe-selector). This tool is based on the principles of the COSHH-Essentials (C-E) control banding (CB) tool, which was developed for the exposure risk management of hazardous chemicals in the workplace by small and medium sized enterprises (SMEs) and general practice H&S professionals. RPE-Select can be used for identifying adequate and suitable RPE for dusts, fibres, mist (solvent, water, and oil based), sprays, volatile solids, fumes, gases, vapours, and actual or potential oxygen deficiency. It can be applied for substances and products with safety data sheets as well as for a large number of commonly encountered process-generated substances (PGS), such as poultry house dusts or welding fume. Potential international usability has been built-in by using the Hazard Statements developed for the Globally Harmonised System (GHS) and providing recommended RPE in picture form as well as with a written specification. Illustration helps to compensate for the variabilities in assigned protection factors across the world. RPE-Select uses easily understandable descriptions/explanations and an interactive stepwise flow for providing input/answers at each step. The output of the selection process is a report summarising the user input data and a selection of RPE, including types of filters where applicable, from which the user can select the appropriate one for each wearer. In addition, each report includes 'Dos' and 'Don'ts' for the recommended RPE. RPE-Select outcomes, based on up to 20 hypothetical use scenarios, were evaluated in comparison with other available RPE selection processes and tools, and by 32 independent users with a broad range of familiarities with industrial use scenarios in general and respiratory protection in particular. For scenarios involving substances having safety data sheets, 87% of RPE-Select outcomes resulted in a 'safe' RPE selection, while 98% 'safe' outcomes were achieved for scenarios involving process-generated substances. Reasons for the outliers were examined. User comments and opinions on the mechanics and usability of RPE-Select are also presented.
1.Health and Safety Laboratory, Harpur Hill, Buxton SK17 9JN, UK;
Nick
N
Vaughan
2.Health and Safety Executive, Redgrave Court, Merton Road, Bootle L20 7HS, UK; bob.rajan@hse.gsi.gov.uk.
Bob
B
Rajan-Sithamparanadarajah
3.NHS Health Scotland, Scottish Centre for Healthy Working Lives, Meridian Court, 5 Cadogan Street, Glasgow G2 6QE, UK.
Robert
R
Atkinson
D000395:Air Pollutants, Occupational / Q000009:adverse effects*; D015386:Hazardous Substances; D006801:Humans; D020407:Internet; D016273:Occupational Exposure / Q000517:prevention & control*; D016272:Occupational Health / Q000592:standards*; D012134:Respiratory Protective Devices / Q000592:standards*; D018570:Risk Assessment / Q000379:methods; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D017132:Workplace
D000395:Air Pollutants, Occupational; D015386:Hazardous Substances
RPE; breathing apparatus; confined spaces; filters; occupational hygiene models; respirator; respiratory protective equipment; selection; selector tool; user evaluation.