Barriers and facilitators for implementing a new screening tool in an emergency department: A qualitative study applying the Theoretical Domains Framework.
OBJECTIVE
The aim was to identify the factors that were perceived as most important as facilitators or barriers to the introduction and intended use of a new tool in the emergency department among nurses and a geriatric team.


BACKGROUND
A high incidence of functional decline after hospitalisation for acute medical illness has been shown in the oldest patients and those who are physically frail. In Denmark, more than 35% of older medical patients acutely admitted to the emergency department are readmitted within 90 days after discharge. A new screening tool for use in the emergency department aiming to identify patients at particularly high risk of functional decline and readmission was developed.


METHODS
Qualitative study based on semistructured interviews with nurses and a geriatric team in the emergency department and semistructured single interviews with their managers.


METHODS
The Theoretical Domains Framework guided data collection and analysis. Content analysis was performed whereby new themes and themes already existing within each domain were described.


RESULTS
Six predominant domains were identified: (1) professional role and identity; (2) beliefs about consequences; (3) goals; (4) knowledge; (5) optimism and (6) environmental context and resources. The content analysis identified three themes, each containing two subthemes. The themes were professional role and identity, beliefs about consequences and preconditions for a successful implementation.


CONCLUSIONS
Two different cultures were identified in the emergency department. These cultures applied to different professional roles and identity, different actions and sense making and identified how barriers and facilitators linked to the new screening tool were perceived.


CONCLUSIONS
The results show that different cultures exist in the same local context and influence the perception of barriers and facilitators differently. These cultures must be identified and addressed when implementation is planned.
Optimed, Clinical Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark. jeanette.wassar.kirk@regionh.dk.|Department of Development and Quality, University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark. jeanette.wassar.kirk@regionh.dk.|Department of Education, Aarhus University, Emdrup, Denmark. jeanette.wassar.kirk@regionh.dk.
Jeanette W
JW
Kirk
Optimed, Clinical Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Ditte M
DM
Sivertsen
Optimed, Clinical Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.|Section of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Janne
J
Petersen
Division of Community Medicine, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Per
P
Nilsen
Optimed, Clinical Research Centre, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark.
Helle V
HV
Petersen
D000368:Aged; D003144:Communication Barriers; D003718:Denmark; D004630:Emergencies / Q000451:nursing*; D004636:Emergency Service, Hospital; D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine; D005260:Female; D017144:Focus Groups; D015577:Geriatric Assessment; D006299:Health Services for the Aged; D006801:Humans; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D008297:Male; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D009730:Nursing Assessment; D012720:Severity of Illness Index
Theoretical Domains Framework; acute care; content analysis; culture; implementation; nurses; screening tool