Can clinical prediction tools predict the need for computed tomography in blunt abdominal? A systematic review.
BACKGROUND
Blunt abdominal trauma is a common reason for admission to the Emergency Department. Early detection of injuries is an important goal but is often not straightforward as physical examination alone is not a good predictor of serious injury. Computed tomography (CT) has become the primary method for assessing the stable trauma patient. It has high sensitivity and specificity but there remains concern regarding the long term consequences of high doses of radiation. Therefore an accurate and reliable method of assessing which patients are at higher risk of injury and hence require a CT would be clinically useful. We perform a systematic review to investigate the use of clinical prediction tools (CPTs) for the identification of abdominal injuries in patients suffering blunt trauma.


METHODS
A literature search was performed using Medline, Embase, The Cochrane Library and NHS Evidence up to August 2014. English language, prospective and retrospective studies were included if they derived, validated or assessed a CPT, aimed at identifying intra-abdominal injuries or the need for intervention to treat an intra-abdominal after blunt trauma. Methodological quality was assessed using a 14 point scale. Performance was assessed predominantly by sensitivity.


RESULTS
Seven relevant studies were identified. All studies were derivative studies and no CPT was validated in a separate study. There were large differences in the study design, composition of the CPTs, the outcomes analysed and the methodological quality of the included studies. Sensitivities ranged from 86 to 100%. The highest performing CPT had a lower limit of the 95% CI of 95.8% and was of high methodological quality (11 of 14). Had this rule been applied to the population then 25.1% of patients would have avoided a CT scan.


CONCLUSIONS
Seven CPTs were identified of varying designs and methodological quality. All demonstrate relatively high sensitivity with some achieving very high sensitivity whilst still managing to reduce the number of CTs performed by a significant amount. Further studies are required to validate the results obtained by the highest performing CPTs before any firm recommendation can be used regarding their use in routine clinical practice.
University Hospital of North Midlands, UK; Queen Mary University of London and Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK. Electronic address: alsharples@yahoo.co.uk.
Alistair
A
Sharples
Queen Mary University of London and Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, London, UK.
Karim
K
Brohi
D000007:Abdominal Injuries / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000628:therapy; D000465:Algorithms; D003661:Decision Support Techniques; D004636:Emergency Service, Hospital; D006801:Humans; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D011379:Prognosis; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006113:United Kingdom; D014949:Wounds, Nonpenetrating / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000628:therapy
Blunt abdominal trauma; Clinical prediction tools; Computed tomography