Color in Reference Production: The Role of Color Similarity and Color Codability.
It has often been observed that color is a highly preferred attribute for use in distinguishing descriptions, that is, referring expressions produced with the purpose of identifying an object within a visual scene. However, most of these observations were based on visual displays containing only colors that were maximally different in hue and for which the language of experimentation possessed basic color terms. The experiments described in this paper investigate whether speakers' preference for color is reduced if the color of the target referent is similar to that of the distractors. Because colors that look similar are often also harder to distinguish linguistically, we also examine the impact of the codability of color values. As a third factor, we investigate the salience of available alternative attributes and its impact on the use of color. The results of our experiments show that, while speakers are indeed less likely to use color when the colors in a display are similar, this effect is mostly due to the difficulty in naming similar colors. Color use for color with a basic color term is affected only when the colors of target and distractors are very similar (yet still distinguishable). The salience of our alternative attribute size, manipulated by varying the difference in size between target and distractors, had no impact on the use of color.
Department of Computing, Macquarie University.|Arria NLG.
Jette
J
Viethen
Department of Communication and Information Sciences, Tilburg University.
Thomas
T
van Vessem
Department of Communication and Information Sciences, Tilburg University.
Martijn
M
Goudbeek
Department of Communication and Information Sciences, Tilburg University.
Emiel
E
Krahmer
D000328:Adult; D003116:Color; D003118:Color Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007802:Language; D008297:Male; D011578:Psycholinguistics; D013060:Speech / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
Color; Communication; Distinguishing descriptions; Human experimentation; Language production; Psycholinguistics; Referring expressions