Victim Injury and Social Distance: A National Test of a General Principle of Conflict.
Our inquiry focuses on why some violent offenses but not others result in injury to the victim. Building on existing theory nested in the paradigm of pure sociology, we propose and test a general principle of conflict: Victim injury varies directly with social distance. This principle predicts that offenders are more likely to harm victims with whom they are less well acquainted and less similar culturally. We test three hypotheses derived from this principle with data from the National Crime Victimization Survey and find little support for the theory. Rather, findings suggest exactly the opposite of that predicted: As social distance between offender and victim increases, the odds of victim injury decreases. Recommendations of additional research are made.
School of Public Affairs, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, USA.
Callie Marie
CM
Rennison
Scott
S
Jacques
Andrea
A
Allen
D000374:Aggression; D019548:Crime Victims / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007389:Internal-External Control; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D008297:Male; D012929:Psychological Distance; D012307:Risk Factors; D020377:Self Efficacy; D014947:Wounds and Injuries / Q000453:epidemiology*