Response of macrophyte communities to flow regulation in mountain streams.
River macrophytes are widely used in freshwater ecosystem assessment because of their sensitivity to anthropogenic pressures, even if there are only a few studies that investigated how macrophytes respond to water regime alterations. In this study, we analyzed the effects of dams on river macrophyte communities through a comparison between upstream and downstream sides from 18 dams located in Alps and Apennines. A co-inertia analysis and a Mantel test were applied to assess if the analysis of environmental parameters could be effective in predicting macrophyte community structure. We analyzed morphological and physicochemical inter-site differences and tested the influence of dams on various aspects of community structure (composition, richness, diversity, dominance, coverage) using multivariate randomized block permutation procedure. Plant similarity between sites was evaluated at the level of phylum, and indicator species analysis was performed to identify the taxa most sensitive or tolerant to water regulation. We found that the overall environmental setting overwhelms the dam impact and that the influence of hydrological alteration became apparent when comparing upstream and downstream assemblages at the same dam. In particular, we found that most of taxa had a higher affinity with the downstream side and that in general, stream regulation increases plant richness and coverage, but reduces community evenness. Analyses based on higher taxonomic groups (phyla) demonstrated that this community can be effectively used in bioassessment even at phylum level analysis. In particular, we found that bryophytes, strictly linked with changes in substrate stability, show particular sensitivity to water regulation in mountain streams.
Department of Sciences, Roma Tre University, Rome, Italy. silverio.abati@uniroma3.it.
Silverio
S
Abati
Laboratory of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (SSPT- PROTER- BES), ENEA, Saluggia, VC, Italy.
Maria Rita
MR
Minciardi
Laboratory of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (SSPT- PROTER- BES), ENEA, Saluggia, VC, Italy.
Simone
S
Ciadamidaro
Department of Life, Health & Environmental Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.|CE3C/Azorean Biodiversity Group, University of Azores, Angra do Heroísmo, Portugal.
Simone
S
Fattorini
Department of Sciences, Roma Tre University, Rome, Italy.
Simona
S
Ceschin
D000531:Altitude; D044822:Biodiversity; D044002:Bryophyta / Q000145:classification / Q000254:growth & development; D000460:Chlorophyta / Q000145:classification / Q000254:growth & development; D000458:Cyanobacteria / Q000145:classification / Q000254:growth & development; D017753:Ecosystem; D004784:Environmental Monitoring / Q000379:methods*; D007558:Italy; D010944:Plants; D045483:Rivers / Q000737:chemistry*; D012624:Seaweed / Q000145:classification / Q000254:growth & development; D013557:Switzerland; D064028:Tracheophyta / Q000145:classification / Q000254:growth & development; D014872:Water Movements
Alpine streams; Aquatic plant; Bioassessment; Bryophytes; Dam impact; River flow regulation