Electronic capture of patient-reported and clinician-reported outcome measures in an elective orthopaedic setting: a retrospective cohort analysis.
To determine whether an entirely electronic system can be used to capture both patient-reported outcomes (electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures, ePROMs) as well as clinician-validated diagnostic and complexity data in an elective surgical orthopaedic outpatient setting. To examine patients' experience of this system and factors impacting their experience.



Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data.



Single centre series. Outpatient clinics at an elective foot and ankle unit in the UK.



All new adult patients attending elective orthopaedic outpatient clinics over a 32-month period.



All patients were invited to complete ePROMs prior to attending their outpatient appointment. At their appointment, those patients who had not completed ePROMs were offered the opportunity to complete it on a tablet device with technical support. Matched diagnostic and complexity data were captured by the treating consultant during the appointment.



Capture rates of patient-reported and clinician-reported data. All information and technology (IT) failures, language and disability barriers were captured. Patients were asked to rate their experience of using ePROMs. The scoring systems used included EQ-5D-5L, the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOxFQ) and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score.



Out of 2534 new patients, 2176 (85.9%) completed ePROMs, of whom 1090 (50.09%) completed ePROMs at home/work prior to their appointment. 31.5% used a mobile (smartphone/tablet) device. Clinician-reported data were captured on 2491 patients (98.3%). The mean patient experience score of using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) was 8.55±1.85 out of 10 and 666 patients (30.61%) left comments. Of patients leaving comments, 214 (32.13%) felt ePROMs did not adequately capture their symptoms and these patients had significantly lower patient experience scores (p<0.001).



This study demonstrates the successful implementation of technology into a service improvement programme. Excellent capture rates of ePROMs and clinician-validated diagnostic data can be achieved within a National Health Service setting.
Foot and Ankle Unit, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK.
Karan
K
Malhotra
Foot and Ankle Unit, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK.
Olatunbosun
O
Buraimoh
Foot and Ankle Unit, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK.
James
J
Thornton
Foot and Ankle Unit, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK.
Nicholas
N
Cullen
Foot and Ankle Unit, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK.
Dishan
D
Singh
Foot and Ankle Unit, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK.
Andrew J
AJ
Goldberg
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D003195:Computer Communication Networks / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D017558:Elective Surgical Procedures; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009985:Orthopedics / Q000379:methods*; D000071066:Patient Reported Outcome Measures; D017060:Patient Satisfaction / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011788:Quality of Life / Q000523:psychology*; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D006113:United Kingdom; D055815:Young Adult
AUDIT; Electronic Patient Records; PROMS; Patient reported outcome measures