title: Paradidymis - Fact/Fiction and its Significance.
abstract: A 30-year old infertile male was admitted for microsurgical sub inguinal varicocelectomy. Intraoperatively, two tubular structures of the caliber of neighboring veins were noted. They were distinct from the vas, which was carefully preserved. Histopathology revealed varicose veins along with two convoluted tubular structures lined by ciliated pseudo-stratified epithelium. There was an incomplete thin muscle coat. The lumina were irregular and contained no spermatozoa (Fig. 1). These structures were identified as paradidymis based on the location in the cord and microscopic morphology. We have tried to analyze the medico-legal significance of these benign lesions in our every day practice.
authors.affiliation: Department of Urology, Apollo BGS Hospitals, Adichunchunagiri Road, Kuvempunagar, Mysore 570009, Karnataka, India.
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Raghavendran
authors.affiliation: Apollo BGS Hospitals, Mysore, Karnataka, India.
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Venugopal
authors.affiliation: Department of Urology, Apollo BGS Hospitals, Adichunchunagiri Road, Kuvempunagar, Mysore 570009, Karnataka, India.
authors.forename: V
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Ranjit
authors.affiliation: Department of Urology, Apollo BGS Hospitals, Adichunchunagiri Road, Kuvempunagar, Mysore 570009, Karnataka, India.
authors.forename: Vinay N
authors.initials: VN
authors.lastname: Kaushik
keywords: Mesonephric duct; Paradidymis; Testicular and epididymal appendages; Varicocele; Varicocelectomy; Vas deferens