title: Practice guidelines for program evaluation in community-based rehabilitation.
abstract: This paper proposes practice guidelines to evaluate community-based rehabilitation (CBR) programs.
  
  
  
  These were developed through a rigorous three-phase research process including a literature review on good practices in CBR program evaluation, a field study during which a South Africa CBR program was evaluated, and a Delphi study to generate consensus among a highly credible panel of CBR experts from a wide range of backgrounds and geographical areas.
  
  
  
  The 10 guidelines developed are summarized into a practice model highlighting key features of sound CBR program evaluation. They strongly indicate that sound CBR evaluations are those that give a voice and as much control as possible to the most affected groups, embrace the challenge of diversity, and foster use of evaluation processes and findings through a rigorous, collaborative and empowering approach.
  
  
  
  The practice guidelines should facilitate CBR evaluation decisions in respect to facilitating an evaluation process, using frameworks and designing methods. Implications for rehabilitation Ten practice guidelines provide guidance to facilitate sound community-based rehabilitation (CBR) program evaluation decisions. Key indications of good practice include: • being as participatory and empowering as possible; • ensuring that all, including the most affected, have a real opportunity to share their thoughts; • highly considering mixed methods and participatory tools; • adapting to fit evaluation context, local culture and language(s); • defining evaluation questions and reporting findings using shared CBR language when possible, which the framework offered may facilitate.
authors.affiliation: a Rehabilitation Department , Laval University , Quebec City , Canada.|b School of Rehabilitation , University of Ottawa , Ottawa , Canada.
authors.forename: Marie
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Grandisson
authors.affiliation: b School of Rehabilitation , University of Ottawa , Ottawa , Canada.
authors.forename: Michèle
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Hébert
authors.affiliation: b School of Rehabilitation , University of Ottawa , Ottawa , Canada.
authors.forename: Rachel
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Thibeault
mesh_terms: D003153:Community Health Services / Q000592:standards*; D032921:Consensus; D006233:Persons with Disabilities / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D006801:Humans; D015397:Program Evaluation / Q000592:standards*; D013019:South Africa; D014944:World Health Organization
keywords: Community-based rehabilitation; data collection methods; evaluation process; framework; inclusive community development; model