title: Learning environment: assessing resident experience.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Given their essential role in developing professional identity, academic institutions now require formal assessment of the learning environment (LE). We describe the experience of introducing a novel and practical tool in postgraduate programmes. The Learning Environment for Professionalism (LEP) survey, validated in the undergraduate setting, is relatively short, with 11 questions balanced for positive and negative professionalism behaviours. LEP is anonymous and focused on rotation setting, not an individual, and can be used on an iterative basis. We describe how we implemented the LEP, preliminary results, challenges encountered and suggestions for future application. Academic institutions now require formal assessment of the learning environment METHODS: The study was designed to test the feasibility of introducing the LEP in the postgraduate setting, and to establish the validity and the reliability of the survey. Residents in four programmes completed 187 ratings using LEP at the end of one of 11 rotations.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The resident response rate was 87 per cent. Programme and rotation ratings were similar but not identical. All items rated positively (favourably), but displays of altruism tended to have lower ratings (meaning less desirable behaviour was witnessed), as were ratings for derogatory comments (again meaning that less desirable behaviour was witnessed).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  We have shown that the LEP is a feasible and valid tool that can be implemented on an iterative basis to examine the LE. Two LEP questions in particular, regarding derogatory remarks and demonstrating altruism, recorded the lowest scores, and these areas deserve attention at our institution. Implementation in diverse programmes is planned at our teaching hospitals to further assess reliability. This work may influence other postgraduate programmes to introduce this assessment tool.
authors.affiliation: Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
authors.forename: Anna
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Byszewski
authors.affiliation: Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
authors.forename: Heather
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Lochnan
authors.affiliation: Department of Pediatric Oncology, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
authors.forename: Donna
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Johnston
authors.affiliation: Department of Innovation in Medical Education, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
authors.forename: Christine
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Seabrook
authors.affiliation: Department of Innovation in Medical Education, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
authors.forename: Timothy
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Wood
mesh_terms: D004777:Environment; D005240:Feasibility Studies; D006801:Humans; D007396:Internship and Residency; D007858:Learning; D010820:Physicians; D024382:Professional Role; D000068616:Professionalism; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D013663:Teaching