title: Prevalence of clinically significant decisional conflict: an analysis of five studies on decision-making in primary care.
abstract: Unresolved clinically significant decisional conflict (CSDC) in patients following a consultation with health professionals is often the result of inadequate patient involvement in decision-making and may result in poor outcomes. We sought to identify the prevalence of CSDC in studies on decision-making in primary care and to explore its risk factors.
  
  
  
  We performed a secondary analysis of existing data sets from studies conducted in Primary Care Practice-Based Research Networks in Québec and Ontario, Canada.
  
  
  
  Eligible studies included a patient-reported measure on the 16-item Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) following a decision made with a healthcare professional with no study design restriction.
  
  
  
  CSDC was defined as a score ≥25/100 on the DCS. The prevalence of CSDC was stratified by sex; and patient-level logistic regression analysis was performed to explore its potential risk factors. Data sets of studies were analysed individually and qualitatively compared.
  
  
  
  5 projects conducted between 2003 and 2010 were included. They covered a range of decisions: prenatal genetic screening, antibiotics for acute respiratory infections and miscellaneous. Altogether, the 5 projects gathered data from encounters with a total of 1338 primary care patients (69% female; range of age 15-83). The prevalence of CSDC in patients varied across studies and ranged from 10.3% (95% CI 7.2% to 13.4%) to 31.1% (95% CI 26.6% to 35.6%). Across the 5 studies, risk factors of CSDC included being male, living alone and being 45 or older.
  
  
  
  Prevalence of CSDC in patients who had enrolled in studies conducted in primary care contexts was substantial and appeared to vary according to the type of decision as well as to patient characteristics such as sex, living arrangement and age. Patients presenting risk factors of CSDC should be offered tools to increase their involvement in decision-making.
authors.affiliation: CHU de Québec - Université Laval Research Centre, Québec City, Québec, Canada.
authors.forename: Philippe
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Thompson-Leduc
authors.affiliation: CHU de Québec - Université Laval Research Centre, Québec City, Québec, Canada.
authors.forename: Stéphane
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Turcotte
authors.affiliation: CHU de Québec - Université Laval Research Centre, Québec City, Québec, Canada Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Québec City, Québec, Canada.
authors.forename: Michel
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Labrecque
authors.affiliation: CHU de Québec - Université Laval Research Centre, Québec City, Québec, Canada Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Laval University, Québec City, Québec, Canada.
authors.forename: France
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Légaré
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D003220:Conflict, Psychological; D003657:Decision Making; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D016015:Logistic Models; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009864:Ontario; D010358:Patient Participation; D000071066:Patient Reported Outcome Measures; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D011320:Primary Health Care; D011792:Quebec; D012307:Risk Factors; D055815:Young Adult
keywords: Decisional conflict; PRIMARY CARE; shared decision making