title: A systematic literature review on the ethics of palliative sedation: an update (2016).
abstract: Palliative sedation has been the subject of intensive debate since its first appearance in 1990. In a 2010 review of palliative sedation, the following areas were identified as lacking in consensus: inconsistent terminology, its use in nonphysical suffering, the ongoing experience of distress, and concern that the practice of palliative sedation may hasten death. This review looks at the literature over the past 6 years and provides an update on these outstanding concerns.
  
  
  
  Good clinical guidelines and policies are still required to address issues of emotional distress and waylay concerns that palliative sedation hastens death.
  
  
  
  The empirical evidence suggests some movement toward consensus on the practice of palliative sedation. However, a continued need exists for evidence-informed practice guidelines, education, and research to support the ethical practice of palliative sedation at the end of life. Until that time, clinicians are advised to adopt a framework or guideline that has been expert driven to ensure consistent and ethical use of palliative sedation at the end of life.
authors.affiliation: aDivision of Palliative Care, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto bEthics Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
authors.forename: Blair
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Henry
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D006993:Hypnotics and Sedatives / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D010166:Palliative Care / Q000941:ethics* / Q000379:methods* / Q000523:psychology; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic; D013315:Stress, Psychological / Q000523:psychology; D013727:Terminal Care / Q000941:ethics* / Q000379:methods* / Q000523:psychology; D009626:Terminology as Topic
chemical_list: D006993:Hypnotics and Sedatives