title: Revisiting the global effect and inhibition of return.
abstract: Saccades toward previously cued locations have longer latencies than saccades toward other locations, a phenomenon known as inhibition of return (IOR). Watanabe (Exp Brain Res 138:330-342. doi: 10.1007/s002210100709 , 2001) combined IOR with the global effect (where saccade landing points fall in between neighboring objects) to investigate whether IOR can also have a spatial component. When one of two neighboring targets was cued, there was a clear bias away from the cued location. In a condition where both targets were cued, it appeared that the global effect magnitude was similar to the condition without any cues. However, as the latencies in the double cue condition were shorter compared to the no cue condition, it is still an open question whether these results are representative for IOR. Considering the double cue condition can provide valuable insight into the interaction of the mechanisms underlying the two phenomena, here, we revisit this condition in an adapted paradigm. Our paradigm does result in longer latencies for the cued locations, and we find that the magnitude of the global effect is reduced significantly. Unexpectedly, this holds even when only including saccades with the same latencies for both conditions. Thus, the increased latencies associated with IOR cannot directly explain the reduction in global effect. The global effect reduction can likely best be seen as either a result of short-term depression of exogenous visual signals or a result of IOR established at the center of gravity of cues.
authors.affiliation: Division of Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. vriesdejelmer@gmail.com.
authors.forename: Jelmer P
authors.initials: JP
authors.lastname: De Vries
authors.affiliation: Division of Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
authors.forename: Stefan
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Van der Stigchel
authors.affiliation: Division of Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
authors.forename: Ignace T C
authors.initials: IT
authors.lastname: Hooge
authors.affiliation: Division of Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.|School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
authors.forename: Frans A J
authors.initials: FA
authors.lastname: Verstraten
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007266:Inhibition, Psychological; D008297:Male; D009483:Neuropsychological Tests; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual / Q000502:physiology; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D011597:Psychomotor Performance; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology*; D012438:Saccades; D013028:Space Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
keywords: Global effect; Inhibition of return; Motor attraction; Saccade averaging; Saccadic landing points; Visual selection