title: Impact of the Specific Extraction-Site Location on the Risk of Incisional Hernia After Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The impact of the specific incision used for specimen extraction during laparoscopic colorectal surgery on incisional hernia rates relative to other contributing factors remains unclear.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  This study aimed to assess the relationship between extraction-site location and incisional hernia after laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
  
  
  METHODS
  This was a retrospective cohort study (January 2000 through December 2011).
  
  
  METHODS
  The study was conducted at a high-volume, specialized colorectal surgery department.
  
  
  METHODS
  All of the patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal resection were identified from our prospectively maintained institutional database.
  
  
  METHODS
  Extraction-site and port-site incisional hernias clinically detected by physician or detected on CT scan were collected. Converted cases, defined as the use of a midline incision to perform the operation, were kept in the intent-to-treat analysis. Specific extraction-site groups were compared, and other relevant factors associated with incisional hernia rates were also evaluated with univariate and multivariate analyses.
  
  
  RESULTS
  A total of 2148 patients (54.0% with abdominal and 46.0% with pelvic operations) with a mean age of 51.7 ± 18.2 years (52% women) were reviewed. Used extraction sites were infraumbilical midline (23.7%), stoma site/right or left lower quadrant (15%), periumbilical midline (22.5%), and Pfannenstiel (29.6%) and midline converted (9.2%). Overall crude extraction site incisional hernia rate during a mean follow-up of 5.9 ± 3.0 years was 7.2% (n = 155). Extraction-site incisional hernia crude rates were highest after periumbilical midline (12.6%) and a midline incision used for conversion to open surgery (12.0%). Independent factors associated with extraction-site incisional hernia were any extraction sites compared with Pfannenstiel (periumbilical midline HR = 12.7; midline converted HR = 13.1; stoma site HR = 28.4; p < 0.001 for each), increased BMI (HR = 1.23; p = 0.002), synchronous port-site hernias (HR = 3.66; p < 0.001), and postoperative superficial surgical-site infection (HR = 2.11; p < 0.001).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This study was limited by its retrospective nature, incisional hernia diagnoses based on clinical examination, and heterogeneous surgical population.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Preferential extraction sites to minimize incisional hernia rates should be Pfannenstiel or incisions off the midline. Midline incisions should be avoided when possible.
authors.affiliation: Department of Colorectal Surgery, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
authors.forename: Cigdem
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Benlice
authors.forename: Luca
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Stocchi
authors.forename: Meagan M
authors.initials: MM
authors.lastname: Costedio
authors.forename: Emre
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Gorgun
authors.forename: Hermann
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Kessler
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D003082:Colectomy / Q000379:methods*; D017558:Elective Surgical Procedures; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D000069290:Incisional Hernia / Q000209:etiology*; D010535:Laparoscopy / Q000379:methods*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D015999:Multivariate Analysis; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care; D012007:Rectum / Q000601:surgery*; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012307:Risk Factors