title: Preperitoneal pelvic packing: Technique and outcomes.
abstract: Significant pelvic ring fractures are usually secondary to high-energy trauma, and when associated with other life-threatening injuries and hemodynamic instability, result in high mortality rates ranging from 40 to 60%. The major cause of death during the first 24 h after pelvic trauma is attributed to acute blood loss, with later mortality secondary to multisystem organ failure. In a majority of patients, the source of pelvic bleeding is from disruption of the presacral venous plexus and bony fracture sites, while arterial injury is present in only 10-15%. The optimal management algorithm for hemodynamically unstable patients with pelvic fractures remains controversial. The principles of care center on resuscitation, external stabilization of the pelvis, and hemorrhage control with angiography and embolization (AE) and/or preperitoneal pelvic packing (PPP). AE is effective in controlling arterial bleeding and its role in the management of hemodynamically unstable patients with pelvic fractures is supported by the EAST guidelines. However, since most patients suffer from venous bleeding, PPP can be an alternate life saving technique to control hemorrhage, especially if AE is not immediately available.
authors.affiliation: Rutgers University NJMS, Department of General Surgery, Residency Office, 185 South Orange Avenue, MSB G-512, Newark, NJ 07103, USA.
authors.forename: Dina M
authors.initials: DM
authors.lastname: Filiberto
authors.affiliation: Rutgers University NJMS, Department of General Surgery, Division of Trauma Surgery and Critical Care, 140 Bergen Street, Suite E 1625, Newark, NJ 07101, USA. Electronic address: foxad@rutgers.edu.
authors.forename: Adam D
authors.initials: AD
authors.lastname: Fox
keywords: Preperitoneal pelvic packing