title: Assessing the uniqueness of language: Animal grammatical abilities take center stage.
abstract: Questions related to the uniqueness of language can only be addressed properly by referring to sound knowledge of the relevant cognitive abilities of nonhuman animals. A key question concerns the nature and extent of animal rule-learning abilities. I discuss two approaches used to assess these abilities. One is comparing the structures of animal vocalizations to linguistic ones, and another is addressing the grammatical rule- and pattern-learning abilities of animals through experiments using artificial grammars. Neither of these approaches has so far provided unambiguous evidence of advanced animal abilities. However, when we consider how animal vocalizations are analyzed, the types of stimuli and tasks that are used in artificial grammar learning experiments, the limited number of species examined, and the groups to which these belong, I argue that the currently available evidence is insufficient to arrive at firm conclusions concerning the limitations of animal grammatical abilities. As a consequence, the gap between human linguistic rule-learning abilities and those of nonhuman animals may be smaller and less clear than is currently assumed. This means that it is still an open question whether a difference in the rule-learning and rule abstraction abilities between animals and humans played the key role in the evolution of language.
authors.affiliation: Behavioural Biology, Institute of Biology Leiden and Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden University, P.O. Box 9505, 2300 RA, Leiden, The Netherlands. c.j.ten.cate@biology.leidenuniv.nl.
authors.forename: Carel
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Ten Cate
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D003071:Cognition; D006801:Humans; D007802:Language; D007858:Learning; D008037:Linguistics; D014828:Vocalization, Animal
keywords: Animal cognition; Animal vocalizations; Artificial grammar learning; Comparative cognition; Language evolution