title: Is the Emotional Dog Blind to Its Choices?
abstract: Previous choice blindness studies showed that people sometimes fail to notice when their choice is changed. Subsequently, they are willing to provide reasons for the manipulated choice which is the opposite of the one they made just seconds ago. In the present study, participants first made binary judgments about the wrongness of described behaviors and then were shown an opposite answer during a second reading of some of the descriptions. Half of the participants saw the answer during the second presentation of the description and the other half saw it only after the presentation. Based on Haidt's Social intuitionist model, we hypothesized that participants in the latter group would be less likely to reconcile their intuition with the presented answer and thus they would be more likely to reject it. However, we found no difference between the groups.
authors.affiliation: 1 Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
authors.forename: Marek A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Vranka
authors.affiliation: 2 Department of Psychology, University of Würzburg, Germany.
authors.forename: Štěpán
authors.initials: Š
authors.lastname: Bahník
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000818:Animals; D002755:Choice Behavior; D004285:Dogs / Q000523:psychology*; D004644:Emotions; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D019545:Intuition; D007600:Judgment; D008297:Male; D008570:Memory, Short-Term; D013334:Students / Q000523:psychology*; D055815:Young Adult
keywords: choice blindness; dual-process models; intuition; moral judgment; rationalization; social intuitionist model