title: Systematic Review of Health-Related Work Outcome Measures and Quality Criteria-Based Evaluations of Their Psychometric Properties.
abstract: To examine the state of psychometric validation in the health-related work outcome literature.
  
  
  
  We searched PubMed, PubMed Central, CINAHL, Embase (plus Embase Classic), and PsycINFO from inception to January 2016 using the following search terms: stroke, multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, spinal cord injury, brain injury, musculoskeletal disease, work, absenteeism, presenteeism, occupation, employment, job, outcome measure, assessment, work capacity evaluation, scale, and questionnaire.
  
  
  
  From the 22,676 retrieved abstracts, 597 outcome measures were identified. Inclusion was based on content analysis. There were 95 health-related work outcome measures retained; of these, 2 were treated as outliers and therefore are discussed separately. All 6 authors individually organized the 93 remaining scales based on their content.
  
  
  
  A follow-up search using the same sources, and time period, with the name of the outcome measures and the terms psychometric, reliability, validity, and responsiveness, identified 263 unique classical test theory psychometric property datasets for the 93 tools. An assessment criterion for psychometric properties was applied to each article, and where consensus was not achieved, the rating delivered by most of the assessors was reported.
  
  
  
  Of the articles reported, 18 reporting psychometric data were not accessible and therefore could not be assessed. There were 39 that scored <20% of the maximum achievable score, 106 scored between 20% and 40%, 82 scored between 40% and 60%, 15 scored between 60% and 80%, and only 1 scored >80%. The 3 outcome measures associated with the highest scoring datasets were the Sheehan Disability Scale, the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire, and the assessment of the Subjective Handicap of Epilepsy. Finally, only 2 psychometric validation datasets reported the complete set of baseline psychometric properties.
  
  
  
  This systematic review highlights the current limitations of the health-related work outcome measure literature, including the limited number of robust tools available.
authors.affiliation: University College London Medical School, London, UK; Therapy and Rehabilitation Services, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK.
authors.forename: Bilal Akhter
authors.initials: BA
authors.lastname: Mateen
authors.affiliation: Therapy and Rehabilitation Services, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK.
authors.forename: Catherine
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Doogan
authors.affiliation: Therapy and Rehabilitation Services, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK.
authors.forename: Kate
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Hayward
authors.affiliation: Therapy and Rehabilitation Services, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK.
authors.forename: Susan
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Hourihan
authors.affiliation: Therapy and Rehabilitation Services, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK.
authors.forename: Joanne
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Hurford
authors.affiliation: Therapy and Rehabilitation Services, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK; Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK. Electronic address: D.Playford@ion.ucl.ac.uk.
authors.forename: E Diane
authors.initials: ED
authors.lastname: Playford
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D009140:Musculoskeletal Diseases / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D009422:Nervous System Diseases / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care; D026741:Physical Therapy Modalities / Q000592:standards*; D011594:Psychometrics; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D014938:Work Capacity Evaluation
keywords: Psychometrics; Rehabilitation; Rehabilitation, vocational; Reproducibility of results