title: The Latent Structure of Dictionaries.
abstract: How many words-and which ones-are sufficient to define all other words? When dictionaries are analyzed as directed graphs with links from defining words to defined words, they reveal a latent structure. Recursively removing all words that are reachable by definition but that do not define any further words reduces the dictionary to a Kernel of about 10% of its size. This is still not the smallest number of words that can define all the rest. About 75% of the Kernel turns out to be its Core, a "Strongly Connected Subset" of words with a definitional path to and from any pair of its words and no word's definition depending on a word outside the set. But the Core cannot define all the rest of the dictionary. The 25% of the Kernel surrounding the Core consists of small strongly connected subsets of words: the Satellites. The size of the smallest set of words that can define all the rest-the graph's "minimum feedback vertex set" or MinSet-is about 1% of the dictionary, about 15% of the Kernel, and part-Core/part-Satellite. But every dictionary has a huge number of MinSets. The Core words are learned earlier, more frequent, and less concrete than the Satellites, which are in turn learned earlier, more frequent, but more concrete than the rest of the Dictionary. In principle, only one MinSet's words would need to be grounded through the sensorimotor capacity to recognize and categorize their referents. In a dual-code sensorimotor/symbolic model of the mental lexicon, the symbolic code could do all the rest through recombinatory definition.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Quebec at Montreal.|School of Psychology, University of Ottawa.
authors.forename: Philippe
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Vincent-Lamarre
authors.affiliation: Department of Computer Science, University of Quebec at Montreal.
authors.forename: Alexandre Blondin
authors.initials: AB
authors.lastname: Massé
authors.affiliation: Department of Linguistics, University of São Paulo.
authors.forename: Marcos
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Lopes
authors.affiliation: Department of Computer Science, University of Quebec at Montreal.
authors.forename: Mélanie
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Lord
authors.affiliation: Department of Computer Science, University of Quebec at Montreal.
authors.forename: Odile
authors.initials: O
authors.lastname: Marcotte
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Quebec at Montreal.|Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton.
authors.forename: Stevan
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Harnad
mesh_terms: D004014:Dictionaries as Topic; D006801:Humans; D007858:Learning; D012660:Semantics
keywords: Categorization; Dictionary definition; Dual coding; Graph theory; Lexical semantics; Meaning; Mental lexicon; Symbol grounding