title: Taking Seriously Ingroup Self-Evaluation, Meta-Prejudice, and Prejudice in Analyzing Interreligious Relations.
abstract: The present study aims to understand the conditions where prejudice can be predicted by ingroup and outgroup meta-prejudice. The data collecting was disseminated toward Muslim and Christian participants (N = 362) living in Maumere, Flores Island, Indonesia. In Flores, Christianity is the largest religion and Islam is the second. Across two samples, the effects of ingroup and outgroup meta-prejudice on prejudice were found to be moderated by ingroup self-evaluation. It shows that at high level (but not low) of positive ingroup self-evaluation, ingroup and outgroup meta-prejudice were found to predict prejudice. The results suggest that it is important to consider how group members evaluate their own group and how group members think what others are thinking, in the study pertaining to intergroup relations.
authors.affiliation: Persada Indonesia University(Indonesia).
authors.forename: Idhamsyah Eka
authors.initials: IE
authors.lastname: Putra
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D002835:Christianity; D005260:Female; D006126:Group Processes; D006801:Humans; D007214:Indonesia / Q000208:ethnology; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D007514:Islam; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011287:Prejudice; D012069:Religion and Psychology; D012647:Self-Assessment; D055815:Young Adult
keywords: group evaluations; intergroup relations; meta-knowledge; prejudice