title: Causal Inference for Cross-Modal Action Selection: A Computational Study in a Decision Making Framework.
abstract: Animals try to make sense of sensory information from multiple modalities by categorizing them into perceptions of individual or multiple external objects or internal concepts. For example, the brain constructs sensory, spatial representations of the locations of visual and auditory stimuli in the visual and auditory cortices based on retinal and cochlear stimulations. Currently, it is not known how the brain compares the temporal and spatial features of these sensory representations to decide whether they originate from the same or separate sources in space. Here, we propose a computational model of how the brain might solve such a task. We reduce the visual and auditory information to time-varying, finite-dimensional signals. We introduce controlled, leaky integrators as working memory that retains the sensory information for the limited time-course of task implementation. We propose our model within an evidence-based, decision-making framework, where the alternative plan units are saliency maps of space. A spatiotemporal similarity measure, computed directly from the unimodal signals, is suggested as the criterion to infer common or separate causes. We provide simulations that (1) validate our model against behavioral, experimental results in tasks where the participants were asked to report common or separate causes for cross-modal stimuli presented with arbitrary spatial and temporal disparities. (2) Predict the behavior in novel experiments where stimuli have different combinations of spatial, temporal, and reliability features. (3) Illustrate the dynamics of the proposed internal system. These results confirm our spatiotemporal similarity measure as a viable criterion for causal inference, and our decision-making framework as a viable mechanism for target selection, which may be used by the brain in cross-modal situations. Further, we suggest that a similar approach can be extended to other cognitive problems where working memory is a limiting factor, such as target selection among higher numbers of stimuli and selections among other modality combinations.
authors.affiliation: Department of Biology and Neuroscience Graduate Diploma, York UniversityToronto, ON, Canada; Centre for Vision Research, York UniversityToronto, ON, Canada; Canadian Action and Perception NetworkToronto, ON, Canada; Department of Psychology, York UniversityToronto, ON, Canada.
authors.forename: Mehdi
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Daemi
authors.affiliation: Department of Biology and Neuroscience Graduate Diploma, York UniversityToronto, ON, Canada; Centre for Vision Research, York UniversityToronto, ON, Canada; Department of Psychology, York UniversityToronto, ON, Canada; School of Kinesiology and Health Sciences, York UniversityToronto, ON, Canada.
authors.forename: Laurence R
authors.initials: LR
authors.lastname: Harris
authors.affiliation: Department of Biology and Neuroscience Graduate Diploma, York UniversityToronto, ON, Canada; Centre for Vision Research, York UniversityToronto, ON, Canada; Canadian Action and Perception NetworkToronto, ON, Canada; Department of Psychology, York UniversityToronto, ON, Canada; School of Kinesiology and Health Sciences, York UniversityToronto, ON, Canada; NSERC Brain and Action Program, York UniversityToronto, Canada.
authors.forename: J Douglas
authors.initials: JD
authors.lastname: Crawford
keywords: causal inference; decision-making; multisensory integration; report of sameness; saliency map of space; spatiotemporal similarity; working memory