title: Qualitative Comparative Analysis: A Hybrid Method for Identifying Factors Associated with Program Effectiveness.
abstract: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) was developed over 25 years ago to bridge the qualitative and quantitative research gap. Upon searchingPubMedand theJournal of Mixed Methods Research, this review identified 30 original research studies that utilized QCA. Perceptions that QCA is complex and provides few relative advantages over other methods may be limiting QCA adoption. Thus, to overcome these perceptions, this article demonstrates how to perform QCA using data from fifteen institutions that implemented universal tumor screening (UTS) programs to identify patients at high risk for hereditary colorectal cancer. In this example, QCA revealed a combination of conditions unique to effective UTS programs. Results informed additional research and provided a model for improving patient follow-through after a positive screen.
authors.affiliation: Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
authors.forename: Deborah
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Cragun
authors.affiliation: Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
authors.forename: Tuya
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Pal
authors.affiliation: Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
authors.forename: Susan T
authors.initials: ST
authors.lastname: Vadaparampil
authors.affiliation: University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
authors.forename: Julie
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Baldwin
authors.affiliation: Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
authors.forename: Heather
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Hampel
authors.affiliation: University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
authors.forename: Rita D
authors.initials: RD
authors.lastname: DeBate
keywords: RE-AIM; configurational comparative method; cross-case comparison; effectiveness; evaluation