title: Fusion Imaging to Support Endovascular Aneurysm Repair Using 3D-3D Registration.
abstract: To evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of fusion imaging (FI) during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR).
  
  
  
  FI was performed in 101 consecutive EVAR patients (median age 72 years; 93 men) using automatic registration of the preoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA) with an intraoperative noncontrast cone beam CT (nCBCT; 3D-3D registration). Operative landmarks defined on the CTA were then overlaid in 3 dimensions on fluoroscopy images. Accuracy was measured as the deviation of the position of the lowest renal artery between the FI and angiography. Factors potentially influencing accuracy (α angle, β angle, anesthesia, tortuosity index, neck calcification, neck length, CTA slice thickness, and conventional or sac sealing stent-graft) were analyzed in a multivariate linear regression model.
  
  
  
  Median procedure time for nCBCT was 3 minutes (range 2-20), with 4 minutes (range 0.4-15) for registration. An automatic registration tool was used successfully in 90 (89%) patients. Median craniocaudal deviation of the FI was 3 mm (range 0-15). Full accuracy (<1-mm deviation) was seen in 23 (23%) patients, 1- to 3-mm deviation in 23 (23%), 4- to 5-mm deviation in 22 (22%), and >5-mm deviation in 33 (33%). Caudal deviation potentially resulting in renal coverage was seen in 9 (9%). Lateral plus craniocaudal deviation was a median 5.8 mm (range 0-22). The position of the lowest renal artery compared to the FI was left and cranial in 62 (61%). Aneurysm morphology (β angle, p=0.04), CTA slice thickness (p=0.02), and the use of 2 stiff guidewires in endovascular aneurysm sealing (p=0.01) influenced the overlay accuracy.
  
  
  
  Fusion imaging can be integrated into a daily workflow adding little to the procedure time. Craniocaudal accuracy (<5 mm) was achieved in 68% of cases, allowing optimal C-arm and angiographic catheter positioning or cannulation of target vessels in most patients. However, the accuracy of FI does not allow a noncontrast EVAR procedure without confirmation of FI overlay by a minimal contrast injection or vessel cannulation.
authors.affiliation: Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany.
authors.forename: Christof J
authors.initials: CJ
authors.lastname: Schulz
authors.affiliation: Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany.
authors.forename: Matthias
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Schmitt
authors.affiliation: Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany.
authors.forename: Dittmar
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Böckler
authors.affiliation: Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany.
authors.forename: Philipp
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Geisbüsch
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D000783:Aneurysm / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000628:therapy*; D017544:Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal; D001027:Aortography; D019917:Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation; D057510:Endovascular Procedures; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D021621:Imaging, Three-Dimensional; D008297:Male; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed; D016896:Treatment Outcome
keywords: 3D imaging; 3D reconstructions; abdominal aortic aneurysm; computed tomography angiography; cone beam computed tomography; endovascular aneurysm repair; fluoroscopy; fusion imaging; image overlay; navigation