title: Effect of Adding McKenzie Syndrome, Centralization, Directional Preference, and Psychosocial Classification Variables to a Risk-Adjusted Model Predicting Functional Status Outcomes for Patients With Lumbar Impairments.
abstract: Study Design Retrospective cohort. Background Patient-classification subgroupings may be important prognostic factors explaining outcomes. Objectives To determine effects of adding classification variables (McKenzie syndrome and pain patterns, including centralization and directional preference; Symptom Checklist Back Pain Prediction Model [SCL BPPM]; and the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire subscales of work and physical activity) to a baseline risk-adjusted model predicting functional status (FS) outcomes. Methods Consecutive patients completed a battery of questionnaires that gathered information on 11 risk-adjustment variables. Physical therapists trained in Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy methods classified each patient by McKenzie syndromes and pain pattern. Functional status was assessed at discharge by patient-reported outcomes. Only patients with complete data were included. Risk of selection bias was assessed. Prediction of discharge FS was assessed using linear stepwise regression models, allowing 13 variables to enter the model. Significant variables were retained in subsequent models. Model power (R(2)) and beta coefficients for model variables were estimated. Results Two thousand sixty-six patients with lumbar impairments were evaluated. Of those, 994 (48%), 10 (<1%), and 601 (29%) were excluded due to incomplete psychosocial data, McKenzie classification data, and missing FS at discharge, respectively. The final sample for analyses was 723 (35%). Overall R(2) for the baseline prediction FS model was 0.40. Adding classification variables to the baseline model did not result in significant increases in R(2). McKenzie syndrome or pain pattern explained 2.8% and 3.0% of the variance, respectively. When pain pattern and SCL BPPM were added simultaneously, overall model R(2) increased to 0.44. Although none of these increases in R(2) were significant, some classification variables were stronger predictors compared with some other variables included in the baseline model. Conclusion The small added prognostic capabilities identified when combining McKenzie or pain-pattern classifications with the SCL BPPM classification did not significantly improve prediction of FS outcomes in this study. Additional research is warranted to investigate the importance of classification variables compared with those used in the baseline model to maximize predictive power. Level of Evidence Prognosis, level 4. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2016;46(9):726-741. Epub 31 Jul 2016. doi:10.2519/jospt.2016.6266.
authors.forename: Mark W
authors.initials: MW
authors.lastname: Werneke
authors.forename: Susan
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Edmond
authors.forename: Daniel
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Deutscher
authors.forename: Jason
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Ward
authors.forename: David
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Grigsby
authors.forename: Michelle
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Young
authors.forename: Troy
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: McGill
authors.forename: Brian
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: McClenahan
authors.forename: Jon
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Weinberg
authors.forename: Amy L
authors.initials: AL
authors.lastname: Davidow
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000367:Age Factors; D000368:Aged; D005081:Exercise Therapy / Q000523:psychology; D005239:Fear; D005260:Female; D007722:Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; D006801:Humans; D016013:Likelihood Functions; D016015:Logistic Models; D017116:Low Back Pain / Q000145:classification* / Q000523:psychology; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D010147:Pain Measurement / Q000523:psychology; D026741:Physical Therapy Modalities; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D020379:Risk Adjustment / Q000145:classification / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D013122:Spinal Diseases / Q000145:classification* / Q000523:psychology; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D063189:Symptom Assessment / Q000379:methods; D013577:Syndrome; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D055815:Young Adult
keywords: McKenzie syndromes; centralization; classification; directional preference; functional status; lumbar spine; outcomes; prognosis; psychosocial