title: Acetabular Labral Debridement/Segmental Resection Versus Reconstruction in the Comprehensive Treatment of Symptomatic Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Systematic Review.
abstract: To perform a systematic review comparing outcomes of labral debridement/segmental resection with labral reconstruction as part of a comprehensive treatment strategy for femoroacetabular impingement.
  
  
  
  A systematic review was conducted according to established PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines using defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The study groups were divided into labral debridement/segmental resection (group 1) and labral reconstruction (group 2). Multiple search engines were queried (PubMed, Medline) for this analysis.
  
  
  
  After an exhaustive search of the available literature, 20 publications were included. Twelve studies explored outcomes after labral debridement/resection in a total of 400 hips, whereas 7 studies reported on outcomes after labral reconstruction in a total of 275 hips. One additional matched-pair control study compared labral resection (22 hips) with reconstruction (11 hips). The surgical intervention was a revision in 0% to 100% for group 1 versus 5% to 55% for group 2. A direct anterior approach was not performed in group 2, and cam-type impingement appeared to make up a larger percentage of group 1. The Tönnis grade ranged from 0 to 1 for group 1 versus 0.3 to 1.1 for group 2. Joint replacements were performed in 0% to 30% and 0% to 25%, respectively. The modified Harris Hip Score was the most widely used patient-reported outcome measure and suggested that labral reconstruction was not inferior to labral debridement/segmental resection.
  
  
  
  Clinical outcomes after labral debridement/segmental resection versus labral reconstruction were found to be comparable. In the setting of unsalvageable labral pathology, labral reconstruction was used more frequently as a revision option whereas debridement may be more commonly used in the index setting.
  
  
  
  Level IV, systematic review of Level I, III, and IV studies.
authors.affiliation: Hip Unit, Orthopaedic Department, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland. Electronic address: dr_forster@icloud.com.
authors.forename: Csaba
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Forster-Horvath
authors.affiliation: University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
authors.forename: Noah
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: von Rotz
authors.affiliation: Sports Medicine and Hip Preservation, University of Rochester Department of Orthopaedics, Rochester, New York, U.S.A.
authors.forename: Brian D
authors.initials: BD
authors.lastname: Giordano
authors.affiliation: American Hip Institute, Westmont, Illinois, U.S.A.; Hinsdale Orthopaedics, Westmont, Illinois, U.S.A.
authors.forename: Benjamin G
authors.initials: BG
authors.lastname: Domb
mesh_terms: D001182:Arthroscopy; D002358:Cartilage, Articular / Q000473:pathology; D003646:Debridement; D057925:Femoracetabular Impingement / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*; D006621:Hip Joint / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*; D006801:Humans; D012086:Reoperation; D016896:Treatment Outcome