title: The Misfortunes of Moral Enhancement.
abstract: In Unfit for the Future, Ingmar Persson and Julian Savulescu present a sophisticated argument in defense of the imperative of moral enhancement. They claim that without moral enhancement, the future of humanity is seriously compromised. The possibility of ultimate harm, caused by a dreadful terrorist attack or by a final unpreventable escalation of the present environmental crisis aggravated by the availability of cognitive enhancement, makes moral enhancement a top priority. It may be considered optimistic to think that our present moral capabilities can be successfully improved by means of moral education, moral persuasion, and fear of punishment. So, without moral enhancement, drastic restrictions on human freedom would become the only alternative to prevent those dramatic potential outcomes. In this article, I will try to show that we still have reason to be less pessimistic and that Persson & Savulescu's arguments are fortunately unconvincing.
authors.affiliation: University of Vale do Rio dos Sinos (Unisinos), São Leopoldo, Brazil mazevedogtalk@gmail.com.
authors.forename: Marco Antonio
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Azevedo
mesh_terms: D026688:Bioethical Issues; D005610:Freedom; D006806:Human Rights; D006801:Humans; D007114:Immunization / Q000941:ethics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D035863:Moral Development; D009014:Morals; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D010686:Philosophy, Medical; D012941:Social Responsibility
keywords: Ingmar Persson; Julian Savulescu; cognitive enhancement; environmental crisis; moral enhancement