title: [Clinical outcome of mid-term follow-up of anterior cervical non-fusion surgery versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for cervical spondylosis].
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes of artificial cervical disc replacement (Prodisc-C), dynamic cervical implant and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in the treatment of cervical spondylosis.
  
  
  METHODS
  From May 2011 to May 2013, a total of 44 cervical spondylosis patients that received cervical disc arthroplasty (Prodisc-C), dynamic cervical implant (DCI) or ACDF were retrospectively reviewed in Orthopedics Department, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University.The patients were divided into three groups by surgical methods.Parameters as gender, age, the operation time, blood loss and average hospital stay of three groups were compared.The patients were followed 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months postoperatively.Neck disability index (NDI), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) Score and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) were used to evaluate the clinical outcomes of the three groups.We also measured the cervical lordosis, range of motion of surgical segment and adjacent segment and height of disc at pre-op and post-op.
  
  
  RESULTS
  All the patients were got at least 24 months follow-up.The differences between postoperative JOA, NDI and VAS scores and preoperative scores were of statistical significance (P<0.05). There was no statistical difference in average hospital stay, JOA, NDI and VAS recovery rate (P>0.05) among three groups.But the operative time and intraoperative blood loss were statistically different (P<0.05). Compared the pre-and postoperative ROM of C2-7, operative, upper and lower levels of each group respectively, the difference between pre-and postoperative ROM of ACDF group were of statistically significant [(16.6±3.6)°, (22.3±4.6)°, (18.1±3.1)°, P<0.05], while was no statistically significant of non-fusion group(P>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between pre-and postoperative ROM of upper and lower levels among three groups (P>0.05), but had statistically difference in operative levels [(7.0±1.0) mm, (9.2±1.5) mm, (6.8±1.4) mm, P<0.05]. And there are no serious postoperative complications.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Two cervical non-fusion surgery and ACDF have received good clinical effects in the treatment of spondylotic myelopathy or radicular spondylosis.The artificial cervical disc replacement and dynamic cervical implant can not only recover cervical lordosis and keep the range of motion and stability of the surgical segment, but also reduce the incidence of compensatory motion at adjacent segments and will prevent from adjacent segment degeneration.
authors.affiliation: Orthopedics Department, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China.
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Guan
authors.forename: W L
authors.initials: WL
authors.lastname: Wang
authors.forename: Y
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Hai
authors.forename: Y Z
authors.initials: YZ
authors.lastname: Liu
authors.forename: X L
authors.initials: XL
authors.lastname: Chen
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Chen
mesh_terms: D001178:Arthroplasty; D002574:Cervical Vertebrae; D017586:Diskectomy; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D007403:Intervertebral Disc; D010147:Pain Measurement; D011184:Postoperative Period; D019736:Prostheses and Implants; D011859:Radiography; D016059:Range of Motion, Articular; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D013123:Spinal Fusion; D013128:Spinal Osteophytosis; D055009:Spondylosis; D059145:Total Disc Replacement; D016896:Treatment Outcome