title: The influence of tutor training for peer tutors in the dissection course on the learning behavior of students.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Student tutors in the dissection course are expected to meet high demands in their job, to fulfill these expectations they receive training. Combined tutor training is well accepted by tutors and tutees, however, it is not known how tutor training influences student learning. Deduced from the learning goals of the tutor training, a randomized, controlled, single-blinded study was set up with a quantitative cross-sectional analysis to compare student learning behavior.
  
  
  METHODS
  A total of 197 medical students, coached either by ten trained or ten untrained tutors, were enlisted in the study. To assess the students' learning behavior we employed the LIST questionnaire. A common factor analysis was calculated to extract dimensions. Factor scores of the extracted dimensions were calculated for both groups to estimate differences in learning behavior.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Factor analysis of the LIST questionnaire revealed eight factors explaining 47.57% of the overall variance. The eight factors comprise: deep learning, attention, learning organization, cooperative learning, time management, learning effort, superficial learning and learning environment. Comparing the factor scores of the extracted dimensions, students coached by trained tutors learned significantly more with their fellow students (factor score in cooperative learning 0.194 vs. -0.205, p<0.05), than students trained by untrained tutors. Students coached by trained tutors also tend to be better organized in their learning (factor score in learning organization 0.115 vs. -0.122, p=0.16).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The learning behavior of students coached by trained tutors differs from the learning behavior of students coached by untrained tutors. Students coached by trained tutors learn significantly more often in teams than their colleagues and are better organized.
authors.affiliation: Institute of Clinical Anatomy and Cell Analysis, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany. Electronic address: thomas.shiozawa@uni-tuebingen.de.
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Shiozawa
authors.affiliation: Institute of Clinical Anatomy and Cell Analysis, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany. Electronic address: bernhard.hirt@uni-tuebingen.de.
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Hirt
authors.affiliation: Competence Center for University Teaching in Medicine, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany. Electronic address: maria.lammerding@med.uni-tuebingen.de.
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Lammerding-Koeppel
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000715:Anatomy / Q000193:education*; D003479:Curriculum; D004210:Dissection / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D004311:Double-Blind Method; D004521:Educational Measurement / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D005178:Faculty / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D005260:Female; D005858:Germany; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010379:Peer Group; D013337:Students, Medical / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D000070260:Teacher Training / Q000379:methods / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D013663:Teaching; D055815:Young Adult
keywords: Dissection course; Medical education; Peer-teaching; Tutor training