title: Characterizing neuropathic pain profiles: enriching interpretation of painDETECT.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To psychometrically evaluate painDETECT, a patient-reported screening questionnaire for neuropathic pain (NeP), for discriminating among sensory pain symptoms (burning, tingling/prickling, light touching, sudden pain attacks/electric shock-type pain, cold/heat, numbness, and slight pressure).
  
  
  METHODS
  The seven-item version of painDETECT provides an overall score that targets only sensory symptoms, while the nine-item version adds responses on two items to the overall score, covering pain course pattern and pain radiation. Both versions have relevance in terms of characterizing broad NeP. The nine- and seven-item versions of painDETECT were administered to subjects with confirmed NeP across six conditions identified during office visits to US community-based physicians. Responses on the sensory symptom items were dichotomized into "at least moderate" (ie, moderate, strongly, very strongly) relative to the combined other responses (never, hardly noticed, slightly). Logistic regression of dichotomized variables on the total painDETECT score provided probabilities of experiencing each symptom across the range of painDETECT scores.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Both painDETECT versions discriminated among the symptoms with similar probabilities across the score ranges. Using these data, the probability of moderately experiencing each pain sensory item was estimated for a particular score, providing a pain profile. Additionally, the likelihood of experiencing each sensation was determined for a discrete increase in score, ie, the odds of at least a moderate sensation of burning (versus less than a moderate sensation) was 1.29 for a 1-point increase, 3.52 for a 5-point increase, and 12.42 for every 10-point increase in the nine-item painDETECT score.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  painDETECT differentiates pain profiles across the range of scores such that, for a particular score, the probability of experiencing at least a moderate sensation of each symptom was determined and compared. These results can help characterize NeP symptomatology, enrich interpretation of painDETECT scores, and provide a basis for individualizing NeP management.
authors.affiliation: Pfizer Inc, Groton, CT, USA.
authors.forename: Joseph C
authors.initials: JC
authors.lastname: Cappelleri
authors.affiliation: Eliassen Group, New London, CT, USA.
authors.forename: Vijaya
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Koduru
authors.affiliation: Outcomes Research Consultant, New York, NY, USA.
authors.forename: E Jay
authors.initials: EJ
authors.lastname: Bienen
authors.affiliation: Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA.
authors.forename: Alesia
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Sadosky
keywords: interpretation; neuropathic pain; pain profile; painDETECT; patient-reported outcomes; sensory symptoms