title: Neurotechnological assessment of consciousness disorders: five ethical imperatives.
abstract: Disorders of consciousness (DOCs) cause great human suffering and material costs for society. Understanding of these disorders has advanced remarkably in recent years, but uncertainty remains with respect to the diagnostic criteria and standards of care. One of the most serious problems concerns misdiagnoses, their impact on medical decision-making, and on patients' well-being. Recent studies use neurotechnology to assess residual consciousness in DOC patients that traditional behavioral diagnostic criteria are unable to detect. The results show an urgent need to strengthen the development of new diagnostic tools and more refined diagnostic criteria. If residual consciousness may be inferred from robust and reproducible results from neurotechnological communication with DOC patients, this also raises ethical challenges. With reference to the moral notions of beneficence and fundamental rights, five ethical imperatives are here suggested in terms of diagnosis, communication, interpretation of subjective states, adaptation of living conditions, and care.
authors.affiliation: Professor of Philosophy, Centre for Research Ethics & Bioethics (CRB), Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
authors.forename: Kathinka
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Evers
mesh_terms: D020811:Biomedical Technology / Q000941:ethics* / Q000379:methods; D003244:Consciousness Disorders / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000523:psychology / Q000628:therapy*; D006801:Humans; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000941:ethics / Q000379:methods; D010147:Pain Measurement / Q000941:ethics / Q000379:methods; D057181:Pleasure
keywords: beneficence; consciousness disorder; diagnostic tool; ethical imperative; neurotechnological communication; pain; pleasure