title: Comparison of the Mammography, Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography and Ultrasonography in a Group of 116 patients.
abstract: Mammography (MG) is the gold-standard in breast cancer detection - the only method documented to reduce breast cancer mortality. Breast ultrasound (US) has been shown to increase sensitivity to breast cancers in screening women with dense breasts. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) is a novel technique intensively developed in the last few years. The goal of this study was to compare the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of MG, US and CESM in detecting malignant breast lesions. The study included 116 patients. All patients were symptomatic and underwent MG, US and CESM. A radiologist with 20 years of experience in US and MG breast imaging and 1 year of experience in CESM reviewed images acquired in each of the three modalities separately, within an interval of 14-30 days. All identified lesions were confirmed at core biopsy. BI-RADS classifications on US, MG and CESM were compared to histopathology. MG, CESM and US were compared among 116 patients with 137 lesions encountered. Sensitivity of CESM was 100%, significantly higher than that of MG (90%, p<0.004) or US (92%, p<0.01). CESM accuracy was 78%, also higher than MG (69%, p<0.004) and US (70%, p=0.03). There was no statistically significant difference between AUCs for CESM and US (both 0.83). The AUCs of both US and CESM, however, were significantly larger than that of MG (p<0.0004 for each). CESM permitted better detection of malignant lesions than both MG and US, read individually. CESM found lesion enhancement in some benign lesions, as well, yielding a rate of false-positive diagnoses similar to that of MG and US.
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiology, Center of Oncology, Cracow Branch, Cracow, Poland.
authors.forename: Elzbieta
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Luczyńska
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiology, Center of Oncology, Cracow Branch, Cracow, Poland sylwia.heinze-paluchowska@ifj.edu.pl.
authors.forename: Sylwia
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Heinze
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiobiology, Center of Oncology, Cracow Branch, Cracow, Poland.
authors.forename: Agnieszka
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Adamczyk
authors.affiliation: Department of Patomorphology, Center of Oncology, Cracow Branch, Cracow, Poland.
authors.forename: Janusz
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Rys
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgical Oncology, Center of Oncology, Cracow Branch, Cracow, Poland.
authors.forename: Jerzy W
authors.initials: JW
authors.lastname: Mitus
authors.affiliation: Radiology Dept., University of Colorado-Denver, School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, U.S.A.
authors.forename: Edward
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Hendrick
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001940:Breast / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000473:pathology; D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000473:pathology; D003287:Contrast Media; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; D008327:Mammography / Q000379:methods*; D008875:Middle Aged; D016217:Ultrasonography, Mammary
chemical_list: D003287:Contrast Media
keywords: Breast cancer; contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM); mammography (MG); ultrasonography (US)