title: Peer Review and Surgical Innovation: Robotic Surgery and Its Hurdles.
abstract: The peer review processes as outlined in the Health Care Quality Improvement Act (HCQIA) is meant ensure quality standard of care through a self-policing mechanism by the medical community. This process grants immunity for people filing a peer review, which is meant to protect whistleblowers. However, it also creates a loophole that can be used maliciously to hinder competition. This is accentuated when surgeons are integrating new technologies, such as robotic surgery, into their practice. With more than 2000 da Vinci robots in use and more than 300 new units being shipped each year, robotic surgery has become a mainstay in the surgical field. The applications for robots continue to expand as surgeons discover their expanding capability. We need a better peer review process. That ensures the peer review is void of competitive bias. Peer reviewers need to be familiar with the procedure and the technology. The current process could stymie innovation in the name of competition.
authors: Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Room A-110, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
authors: Dinesh
authors: D
authors: Vyas
authors: Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Room A-110, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.
authors: Sean
authors: S
authors: Cronin
keywords: Health Care Quality Improvement Act (HCQIA); Peer Review; Robotic Surgery