title: Is One Trial Sufficient to Obtain Excellent Pressure Pain Threshold Reliability in the Low Back of Asymptomatic Individuals? A Test-Retest Study.
abstract: The assessment of pressure pain threshold (PPT) provides a quantitative value related to the mechanical sensitivity to pain of deep structures. Although excellent reliability of PPT has been reported in numerous anatomical locations, its absolute and relative reliability in the lower back region remains to be determined. Because of the high prevalence of low back pain in the general population and because low back pain is one of the leading causes of disability in industrialized countries, assessing pressure pain thresholds over the low back is particularly of interest. The purpose of this study study was (1) to evaluate the intra- and inter- absolute and relative reliability of PPT within 14 locations covering the low back region of asymptomatic individuals and (2) to determine the number of trial required to ensure reliable PPT measurements. Fifteen asymptomatic subjects were included in this study. PPTs were assessed among 14 anatomical locations in the low back region over two sessions separated by one hour interval. For the two sessions, three PPT assessments were performed on each location. Reliability was assessed computing intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimum detectable change (MDC) for all possible combinations between trials and sessions. Bland-Altman plots were also generated to assess potential bias in the dataset. Relative reliability for both intra- and inter- session was almost perfect with ICC ranged from 0.85 to 0.99. With respect to the intra-session, no statistical difference was reported for ICCs and SEM regardless of the conducted comparisons between trials. Conversely, for inter-session, ICCs and SEM values were significantly larger when two consecutive PPT measurements were used for data analysis. No significant difference was observed for the comparison between two consecutive measurements and three measurements. Excellent relative and absolute reliabilities were reported for both intra- and inter-session. Reliable measurements can be equally achieved when using the mean of two or three consecutive PPT measurements, as usually proposed in the literature, or with only the first one. Although reliability was almost perfect regardless of the conducted comparison between PPT assessments, our results suggest using two consecutive measurements to obtain higher short term absolute reliability.
authors: Univ. Grenoble-Alpes, EA AGEIS, Grenoble, France.|Physical Activity and Human Performance group-SMI, Dept. of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
authors: Romain
authors: R
authors: Balaguier
authors: Physical Activity and Human Performance group-SMI, Dept. of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
authors: Pascal
authors: P
authors: Madeleine
authors: Univ. Grenoble-Alpes, EA AGEIS, Grenoble, France.|Physical Activity and Human Performance group-SMI, Dept. of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.|Institut Universitaire de France, Paris, France.
authors: Nicolas
authors: N
authors: Vuillerme
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D017116:Low Back Pain; D008297:Male; D010147:Pain Measurement / Q000379:methods*; D017288:Pain Threshold; D011312:Pressure; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012107:Research Design