title: [Performance evaluation of two N95 filtering-facepiece respirators on decomposition products of sulfur hexafluoride].
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To assess the filtration efficiency of two N95 filtering-facepiece respirators (FFRs) for the decomposition products of sulfur hexafluoride (SF6).
  
  
  METHODS
  Two types of N95 FFRs (the particulate and the acid-proof respirators) were selected in this study. The decomposition products of SF6, including particles, hydrogen fluoride (HF) and sulfur dioxide (SO2) , were measured under experimental condition by using TSI PortaCount Plus, fluorine ion-selective electrodes and spectrophotometer separately. The filtration efficiency was then calculated and compared.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Both two models of N95 respirators had lowest filtration efficiency larger than 95% for particles under airflow ranged from 10 to 95 L/min. When exposed to different concentrations of HF (low: 0.00~1.99 mg/m(3), middle: 2.00~3.99 mg/m(3), high: >4 mg/m(3)) , the acid-proof N95 respirator was more effective than the particulate respirator (P<0.05) with a filtration efficiency of 98.83%, 99.08%, and 99.03% versus 48.44%, 45.71%, and 47.31%. For four SO2 concentration ranges (0.00~2.49 mg/m(3), 2.50~4.99 mg/m(3), 5.00~9.99 mg/m(3), and >10.00 mg/m(3)) , the acid-proof respirator showed a high filtration efficiency within exposure to 1.5 hours: 95.73%, 98.67%, 98.14%, and 97.78%, respectively, when exposure duration extended to 4 hours, the filtration efficiency of the acid-proof respirator decreased to 91.97%, 82.28%, 70.12%, and 58.56%, respectively.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Both the particulate and the acid-proof N95 FFRs met national standards on the particulate filtration efficiency. The acid-proof N95 respirator demonstrates to be more effective in filtering HF and SO2 than the particulate respirator. The filtration efficiency could decrease to an unsafe condition under longer exposure duration, timely replacement of respirator is recommended at the workplace.
authors: Key Laboratory of Environment and Health, Ministry of Education & Ministry of Environmental Protection, Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China.
authors: X C
authors: XC
authors: Zhu
authors: W
authors: W
authors: Lu
authors: X Q
authors: XQ
authors: Nie
authors: M
authors: M
authors: Zhou
authors: R B
authors: RB
authors: Zhang
authors: S X
authors: SX
authors: Qin
authors: W H
authors: WH
authors: Chen
mesh_terms: D005374:Filtration; D006858:Hydrofluoric Acid; D017736:Ion-Selective Electrodes; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D013458:Sulfur Dioxide; D013459:Sulfur Hexafluoride; D012122:Ventilators, Mechanical
chemical_list: D013458:Sulfur Dioxide; D006858:Hydrofluoric Acid; D013459:Sulfur Hexafluoride