title: Colleague and patient appraisal of consultant psychiatrists and the effects of patient detention on appraisal scores.
abstract: Aims and method This paper aims to review colleague and patient feedback from the 10-year period of the operation of the Royal College of Psychiatrists' 360-degree appraisal system, specifically: (1) examine the overall distribution of ratings; (2) examine the effect of working primarily with detained patients on patient feedback, represented by forensic psychiatrists; and (3) look for a relationship between colleague and patient ratings. Results Data were analysed for 977 participating psychiatrists. Both colleagues and patients rated psychiatrists overall with high scores. Less than 1% were identified as low scorers, although there was no relationship between those identified by colleagues or patients. Colleague and patient feedback scores varied little between subspecialties including forensic consultants. Clinical implications Psychiatrists in all subspecialties obtained high scores from colleagues and staff. Working with detained patients appeared to have little effect on patient ratings.
authors: Royal College of Psychiatrists' Centre for Quality Improvement, London, UK.
authors: Miranda
authors: M
authors: Heneghan
authors: Royal College of Psychiatrists' Centre for Quality Improvement, London, UK.
authors: Robert
authors: R
authors: Chaplin