title: Sperm, Clinics, and Parenthood.
abstract: In this article I examine a recent approach to regulating assisted reproduction, whereby use of some kind of medical intervention 'triggers' laws governing legal parenthood that are more favourable to intending parents and sperm providers. I argue that although perhaps an improvement on the previous legal framework, these laws are problematic for three important reasons. First, they are prone to violating parental rights and unjustly imposing substantial burdens on individuals. Second, they are discriminatory. Third, even if we take a pragmatic approach to the question of parenthood in these cases, these laws fail to properly consider the welfare interests of children. Finally, I conclude by showing that my argument does not entail adopting a laissez-fair attitude to conception using third-party sperm.
authors: r.brandt@lancaster.ac.uk.
authors: Reuven
authors: R
authors: Brandt
mesh_terms: D028663:Ethical Theory; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D028681:Moral Obligations; D010287:Parent-Child Relations; D010290:Parents; D012098:Reproduction / Q000941:ethics*; D012941:Social Responsibility; D013094:Spermatozoa; D014019:Tissue Donors / Q000941:ethics*
keywords: HFE Act; gamete donation; parenthood; reproductive ethics; sperm donation